Robinson projection

From HandWiki
Revision as of 17:30, 6 February 2024 by Steve2012 (talk | contribs) (over-write)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Short description: Pseudocylindrical compromise map projection
Robinson projection of the world
The Robinson projection with Tissot's indicatrix of deformation
Map of the world created by the Central Intelligence Agency, with standard parallels 38°N and 38°S

The Robinson projection is a map projection of a world map that shows the entire world at once. It was specifically created in an attempt to find a good compromise to the problem of readily showing the whole globe as a flat image.[1]

The Robinson projection was devised by Arthur H. Robinson in 1963 in response to an appeal from the Rand McNally company, which has used the projection in general-purpose world maps since that time. Robinson published details of the projection's construction in 1974. The National Geographic Society (NGS) began using the Robinson projection for general-purpose world maps in 1988, replacing the Van der Grinten projection.[2] In 1998, NGS abandoned the Robinson projection for that use in favor of the Winkel tripel projection, as the latter "reduces the distortion of land masses as they near the poles".[3][4]

Strengths and weaknesses

The Robinson projection is neither equal-area nor conformal, abandoning both for a compromise. The creator felt that this produced a better overall view than could be achieved by adhering to either. The meridians curve gently, avoiding extremes, but thereby stretch the poles into long lines instead of leaving them as points.[1]

Hence, distortion close to the poles is severe, but quickly declines to moderate levels moving away from them. The straight parallels imply severe angular distortion at the high latitudes toward the outer edges of the map – a fault inherent in any pseudocylindrical projection. However, at the time it was developed, the projection effectively met Rand McNally's goal to produce appealing depictions of the entire world.[5][6]

I decided to go about it backwards. … I started with a kind of artistic approach. I visualized the best-looking shapes and sizes. I worked with the variables until it got to the point where, if I changed one of them, it didn't get any better. Then I figured out the mathematical formula to produce that effect. Most mapmakers start with the mathematics.
—1988 New York Times article[1]

Formulation

The projection is defined by the table:[7][8][9]

Latitude X Y
1.0000 0.0000
0.9986 0.0620
10° 0.9954 0.1240
15° 0.9900 0.1860
20° 0.9822 0.2480
25° 0.9730 0.3100
30° 0.9600 0.3720
35° 0.9427 0.4340
40° 0.9216 0.4958
45° 0.8962 0.5571
50° 0.8679 0.6176
55° 0.8350 0.6769
60° 0.7986 0.7346
65° 0.7597 0.7903
70° 0.7186 0.8435
75° 0.6732 0.8936
80° 0.6213 0.9394
85° 0.5722 0.9761
90° 0.5322 1.0000

The table is indexed by latitude at 5-degree intervals; intermediate values are calculated using interpolation. Robinson did not specify any particular interpolation method, but it is reported that others used either Aitken interpolation (with polynomials of unknown degrees) or cubic splines while analyzing area deformation on the Robinson projection.[10] The X column is the ratio of the length of the parallel to the length of the equator; the Y column can be multiplied by 0.2536[11] to obtain the ratio of the distance of that parallel from the equator to the length of the equator.[7][9]

Coordinates of points on a map are computed as follows:[7][9]

[math]\displaystyle{ \begin{align} x &= 0.8487 \, R X (\lambda - \lambda_0), \\ y &= 1.3523 \, R Y, \end{align} }[/math] where R is the radius of the globe at the scale of the map, λ is the longitude of the point to plot, and λ0 is the central meridian chosen for the map (both λ and λ0 are expressed in radians).

Simple consequences of these formulas are:

  • With x computed as constant multiplier to the meridian across the entire parallel, meridians of longitude are thus equally spaced along the parallel.
  • With y having no dependency on longitude, parallels are straight horizontal lines.

Applications

The Central Intelligence Agency World Factbook uses the Robinson projection in its political and physical world maps.

The European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control recommends using the Robinson projection for mapping the whole world.[12]

See also

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 John Noble Wilford (October 25, 1988). "The Impossible Quest for the Perfect Map". The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/1988/10/25/science/the-impossible-quest-for-the-perfect-map.html?pagewanted=all&src=pm. 
  2. Snyder, John P. (1993). Flattening the Earth: 2000 Years of Map Projections. University of Chicago Press. p. 214. ISBN 0226767469. 
  3. "National Geographic Maps – Wall Maps – World Classic (Enlarged)". National Geographic Society. https://www.natgeomaps.com/re-world-classic-enlarged. "This map features the Winkel Tripel projection to reduce distortion of land masses as they near the poles." 
  4. "Selecting a Map Projection". National Geographic Society. https://www.nationalgeographic.org/media/selecting-map-projection/. 
  5. Myrna Oliver (November 17, 2004). "Arthur H. Robinson, 89; Cartographer Hailed for Map's Elliptical Design". Los Angeles Times. http://articles.latimes.com/2004/nov/17/local/me-robinson17. 
  6. New York Times News Service (November 16, 2004). "Arthur H. Robinson, 89 Geographer improved world map". Chicago Tribune. http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2004-11-16/news/0411160188_1_map-division-flat-map-arthur-h-robinson. 
  7. 7.0 7.1 7.2 Ipbuker, C. (July 2005). "A Computational Approach to the Robinson Projection". Survey Review 38 (297): 204–217. doi:10.1179/sre.2005.38.297.204. https://vdocuments.site/a-computational-approach-to-the-robinson-projection.html. Retrieved 2019-02-17. 
  8. "Table for Constructing the Robinson Projection". RadicalCartography.net. http://www.radicalcartography.net/projections/robinsontable.html. 
  9. 9.0 9.1 9.2 Snyder, John P.; Voxland, Philip M. (1989). An Album of Map Projections. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1453. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. pp. 82–83, 222–223. doi:10.3133/pp1453. http://pubs.usgs.gov/pp/1453/report.pdf. Retrieved 2022-02-04. 
  10. Richardson, Robert T. (1989). "Area deformation on the Robinson projection". The American Cartographer 16 (4): 294–296. doi:10.1559/152304089783813936. https://fdocuments.net/document/area-deformation-on-the-robinson-projection.html. 
  11. From the formulas below, this can be calculated as [math]\displaystyle{ \frac{1.3523}{0.8487 \cdot 2\pi} \approx 0.2536 }[/math].
  12. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. (2018). Guidelines for presentation of surveillance data: tables graphs maps.. LU: Publications Office. doi:10.2900/452488. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2900/452488. 

Further reading

  • Arthur H. Robinson (1974). "A New Map Projection: Its Development and Characteristics". In: International Yearbook of Cartography. Vol 14, 1974, pp. 145–155.
  • John B. Garver Jr. (1988). "New Perspective on the World". In: National Geographic, December 1988, pp. 911–913.
  • John P. Snyder (1993). Flattening The Earth—2000 Years of Map Projections, The University of Chicago Press. pp. 214–216.

External links