Engineering:Gas turbine

From HandWiki
Revision as of 16:15, 7 February 2024 by John Stpola (talk | contribs) (correction)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Short description: Type of internal and continuous combustion engine
Examples of gas turbine configurations: (1) turbojet, (2) turboprop, (3) turboshaft (shown as electric generator), (4) high-bypass turbofan, (5) low-bypass afterburning turbofan

A gas turbine or gas turbine engine, by its old name internal combustion turbine, is a type of continuous flow internal combustion engine.[1] The main parts common to all gas turbine engines form the power-producing part (known as the gas generator or core) and are, in the direction of flow:

Additional components have to be added to the gas generator to suit its application. Common to all is an air inlet but with different configurations to suit the requirements of marine use, land use or flight at speeds varying from stationary to supersonic. A propelling nozzle is added to produce thrust for flight. An extra turbine is added to drive a propeller (turboprop) or ducted fan (turbofan) to reduce fuel consumption (by increasing propulsive efficiency) at subsonic flight speeds. An extra turbine is also required to drive a helicopter rotor or land-vehicle transmission (turboshaft), marine propeller or electrical generator (power turbine). Greater thrust-to-weight ratio for flight is achieved with the addition of an afterburner.

The basic operation of the gas turbine is a Brayton cycle with air as the working fluid: atmospheric air flows through the compressor that brings it to higher pressure; energy is then added by spraying fuel into the air and igniting it so that the combustion generates a high-temperature flow; this high-temperature pressurized gas enters a turbine, producing a shaft work output in the process, used to drive the compressor; the unused energy comes out in the exhaust gases that can be repurposed for external work, such as directly producing thrust in a turbojet engine, or rotating a second, independent turbine (known as a power turbine) that can be connected to a fan, propeller, or electrical generator. The purpose of the gas turbine determines the design so that the most desirable split of energy between the thrust and the shaft work is achieved. The fourth step of the Brayton cycle (cooling of the working fluid) is omitted, as gas turbines are open systems that do not reuse the same air.

Gas turbines are used to power aircraft, trains, ships, electrical generators, pumps, gas compressors, and tanks.[2]


Timeline of development

Sketch of John Barber's gas turbine, from his patent
  • 50: Earliest records of Hero's engine (aeolipile). It most likely served no practical purpose, and was rather more of a curiosity; nonetheless, it demonstrated an important principle of physics that all modern turbine engines rely on.[3]
  • 1000: The "Trotting Horse Lamp" (Chinese: 走马灯, zŏumădēng) was used by the Chinese at lantern fairs as early as the Northern Song dynasty. When the lamp is lit, the heated airflow rises and drives an impeller with horse-riding figures attached on it, whose shadows are then projected onto the outer screen of the lantern.[4]
  • 1500: The Smoke jack was drawn by Leonardo da Vinci: Hot air from a fire rises through a single-stage axial turbine rotor mounted in the exhaust duct of the fireplace and turns the roasting spit by gear-chain connection.
  • 1791: A patent was given to John Barber, an Englishman, for the first true gas turbine. His invention had most of the elements present in the modern day gas turbines. The turbine was designed to power a horseless carriage.[5][6]
  • 1894: Sir Charles Parsons patented the idea of propelling a ship with a steam turbine, and built a demonstration vessel, the Turbinia, easily the fastest vessel afloat at the time.
  • 1899: Charles Gordon Curtis patented the first gas turbine engine in the US.[7]
  • 1900: Sanford Alexander Moss submitted a thesis on gas turbines. In 1903, Moss became an engineer for General Electric's Steam Turbine Department in Lynn, Massachusetts.[8] While there, he applied some of his concepts in the development of the turbocharger.[8]
  • 1903: A Norwegian, Ægidius Elling, built the first gas turbine that was able to produce more power than needed to run its own components, which was considered an achievement in a time when knowledge about aerodynamics was limited. Using rotary compressors and turbines it produced 11 hp.[9]
  • 1904: A gas turbine engine designed by Franz Stolze, based on his earlier 1873 patent application, is built and tested in Berlin. The Stolze gas turbine was too inefficient to sustain its own operation.[3]
  • 1906: The Armengaud-Lemale gas turbine tested in France. This was a relatively large machine which included 25 stage centrifugal compressor designed by Auguste Rateau and built by the Brown Boveri Company. The gas turbine could sustain its own air compression but was too inefficient to produce useful work.[3]
  • 1910: Holzwarth gas turbine (pulse combustion) achieved 150 kW (200 hp).[3]
  • 1920s The practical theory of gas flow through passages was developed into the more formal (and applicable to turbines) theory of gas flow past airfoils by A. A. Griffith resulting in the publishing in 1926 of An Aerodynamic Theory of Turbine Design. Working testbed designs of axial turbines suitable for driving a propeller were developed by the Royal Aeronautical Establishment.[10]
  • 1930: Having found no interest from the RAF for his idea, Frank Whittle patented[11] the design for a centrifugal gas turbine for jet propulsion. The first successful test run of his engine occurred in England in April 1937.[12]
  • 1932: The Brown Boveri Company of Switzerland starts selling axial compressor and turbine turbosets as part of the turbocharged steam generating Velox boiler. Following the gas turbine principle, the steam evaporation tubes are arranged within the gas turbine combustion chamber; the first Velox plant was erected in Mondeville, Calvados, France.[13]
  • 1936: The first constant flow industrial gas turbine is commissioned by the Brown Boveri Company and goes into service at Sun Oil's Marcus Hook refinery in Pennsylvania, US.[14]
  • 1937: Working proof-of-concept prototype turbojet engine runs in UK (Frank Whittle's) and Germany (Hans von Ohain's Heinkel HeS 1). Henry Tizard secures UK government funding for further development of Power Jets engine.[15]
  • 1939: The turbojet powered Heinkel He 178, the world's first jet aircraft, makes its first flight. The First 4 MW utility power generation gas turbine is built by the Brown Boveri Company for an emergency power station in Neuchâtel, Switzerland.[16]
  • 1944: The Junkers Jumo 004 engine enters full production, powering the first German military jets such as the Messerschmitt Me 262. This marks the beginning of the reign of gas turbines in the sky.
  • 1946: National Gas Turbine Establishment formed from Power Jets and the RAE turbine division to bring together Whittle and Hayne Constant's work.[17] In Beznau, Switzerland the first commercial reheated/recuperated unit generating 27 MW was commissioned.[18]
  • 1947: A Metropolitan Vickers G1 (Gatric) becomes the first marine gas turbine when it completes sea trials on the Royal Navy's M.G.B 2009 vessel. The Gatric was an aeroderivative gas turbine based on the Metropolitan Vickers F2 jet engine.[19][20]
  • 1995: Siemens becomes the first manufacturer of large electricity producing gas turbines to incorporate single crystal turbine blade technology into their production models, allowing higher operating temperatures and greater efficiency.[21]
  • 2011 Mitsubishi Heavy Industries tests the first >60% efficiency combined cycle gas turbine (the M501J) at its Takasago, Hyōgo, works.[22][23]

Theory of operation

The Brayton cycle

In an ideal gas turbine, gases undergo four thermodynamic processes: an isentropic compression, an isobaric (constant pressure) combustion, an isentropic expansion and heat rejection. Together, these make up the Brayton cycle, also known as the "constant pressure cycle".[24] It is distinguished from the Otto cycle, in that all the processes (compression, ignition combustion, exhaust), occur at the same time, continuously.[24]

In a real gas turbine, mechanical energy is changed irreversibly (due to internal friction and turbulence) into pressure and thermal energy when the gas is compressed (in either a centrifugal or axial compressor). Heat is added in the combustion chamber and the specific volume of the gas increases, accompanied by a slight loss in pressure. During expansion through the stator and rotor passages in the turbine, irreversible energy transformation once again occurs. Fresh air is taken in, in place of the heat rejection.

Air is taken in by a compressor, called a gas generator, with either an axial or centrifugal design, or a combination of the two.[24] This air is then ducted into the combustor section which can be of a annular, can, or can-annular design.[24] In the combustor section, roughly 70% of the air from the compressor is ducted around the combustor itself for cooling purposes.[24] The remaining roughly 30% the air is mixed with fuel and ignited by the already burning air-fuel mixture, which then expands producing power across the turbine.[24] This expansion of the mixture then leaves the combustor section and has its velocity increased across the turbine section to strike the turbine blades, spinning the disc they are attached to, thus creating useful power. Of the power produced, 60-70% is solely used to power the gas generator.[24] The remaining power is used to power what the engine is being used for, typically an aviation application, being thrust in a turbojet, driving the fan of a turbofan, rotor or accessory of a turboshaft, and gear reduction and propeller of a turboprop.[25][24]

If the engine has a power turbine added to drive an industrial generator or a helicopter rotor, the exit pressure will be as close to the entry pressure as possible with only enough energy left to overcome the pressure losses in the exhaust ducting and expel the exhaust. For a turboprop engine there will be a particular balance between propeller power and jet thrust which gives the most economical operation. In a turbojet engine only enough pressure and energy is extracted from the flow to drive the compressor and other components. The remaining high-pressure gases are accelerated through a nozzle to provide a jet to propel an aircraft.

The smaller the engine, the higher the rotation rate of the shaft must be to attain the required blade tip speed. Blade-tip speed determines the maximum pressure ratios that can be obtained by the turbine and the compressor. This, in turn, limits the maximum power and efficiency that can be obtained by the engine. In order for tip speed to remain constant, if the diameter of a rotor is reduced by half, the rotational speed must double. For example, large jet engines operate around 10,000–25,000 rpm, while micro turbines spin as fast as 500,000 rpm.[26]

Mechanically, gas turbines can be considerably less complex than Reciprocating engines. Simple turbines might have one main moving part, the compressor/shaft/turbine rotor assembly, with other moving parts in the fuel system. This, in turn, can translate into price. For instance, costing 10,000 ℛℳ for materials, the Jumo 004 proved cheaper than the Junkers 213 piston engine, which was 35,000 ℛℳ,[27] and needed only 375 hours of lower-skill labor to complete (including manufacture, assembly, and shipping), compared to 1,400 for the BMW 801.[28] This, however, also translated into poor efficiency and reliability. More advanced gas turbines (such as those found in modern jet engines or combined cycle power plants) may have 2 or 3 shafts (spools), hundreds of compressor and turbine blades, movable stator blades, and extensive external tubing for fuel, oil and air systems; they use temperature resistant alloys, and are made with tight specifications requiring precision manufacture. All this often makes the construction of a simple gas turbine more complicated than a piston engine.

Moreover, to reach optimum performance in modern gas turbine power plants the gas needs to be prepared to exact fuel specifications. Fuel gas conditioning systems treat the natural gas to reach the exact fuel specification prior to entering the turbine in terms of pressure, temperature, gas composition, and the related Wobbe index.

The primary advantage of a gas turbine engine is its power to weight ratio.[citation needed] Since significant useful work can be generated by a relatively lightweight engine, gas turbines are perfectly suited for aircraft propulsion.

Thrust bearings and journal bearings are a critical part of a design. They are hydrodynamic oil bearings or oil-cooled rolling-element bearings. Foil bearings are used in some small machines such as micro turbines[29] and also have strong potential for use in small gas turbines/auxiliary power units[30]

Creep

A major challenge facing turbine design, especially turbine blades, is reducing the creep that is induced by the high temperatures and stresses that are experienced during operation. Higher operating temperatures are continuously sought in order to increase efficiency, but come at the cost of higher creep rates. Several methods have therefore been employed in an attempt to achieve optimal performance while limiting creep, with the most successful ones being high performance coatings and single crystal superalloys.[31] These technologies work by limiting deformation that occurs by mechanisms that can be broadly classified as dislocation glide, dislocation climb and diffusional flow.

Protective coatings provide thermal insulation of the blade and offer oxidation and corrosion resistance. Thermal barrier coatings (TBCs) are often stabilized zirconium dioxide-based ceramics and oxidation/corrosion resistant coatings (bond coats) typically consist of aluminides or MCrAlY (where M is typically Fe and/or Cr) alloys. Using TBCs limits the temperature exposure of the superalloy substrate, thereby decreasing the diffusivity of the active species (typically vacancies) within the alloy and reducing dislocation and vacancy creep. It has been found that a coating of 1–200 μm can decrease blade temperatures by up to 200 °C (392 °F).[32] Bond coats are directly applied onto the surface of the substrate using pack carburization and serve the dual purpose of providing improved adherence for the TBC and oxidation resistance for the substrate. The Al from the bond coats forms Al2O3 on the TBC-bond coat interface which provides the oxidation resistance, but also results in the formation of an undesirable interdiffusion (ID) zone between itself and the substrate.[33] The oxidation resistance outweighs the drawbacks associated with the ID zone as it increases the lifetime of the blade and limits the efficiency losses caused by a buildup on the outside of the blades.[34]

Nickel-based superalloys boast improved strength and creep resistance due to their composition and resultant microstructure. The gamma (γ) FCC nickel is alloyed with aluminum and titanium in order to precipitate a uniform dispersion of the coherent Ni
3
(Al,Ti)
gamma-prime (γ') phases. The finely dispersed γ' precipitates impede dislocation motion and introduce a threshold stress, increasing the stress required for the onset of creep. Furthermore, γ' is an ordered L12 phase that makes it harder for dislocations to shear past it.[35] Further Refractory elements such as rhenium and ruthenium can be added in solid solution to improve creep strength. The addition of these elements reduces the diffusion of the gamma prime phase, thus preserving the fatigue resistance, strength, and creep resistance.[36] The development of single crystal superalloys has led to significant improvements in creep resistance as well. Due to the lack of grain boundaries, single crystals eliminate Coble creep and consequently deform by fewer modes – decreasing the creep rate.[37] Although single crystals have lower creep at high temperatures, they have significantly lower yield stresses at room temperature where strength is determined by the Hall-Petch relationship. Care needs to be taken in order to optimize the design parameters to limit high temperature creep while not decreasing low temperature yield strength.

Types

Jet engines

typical axial-flow gas turbine turbojet, the J85, sectioned for display. Flow is left to right, multistage compressor on left, combustion chambers center, two-stage turbine on right

Airbreathing jet engines are gas turbines optimized to produce thrust from the exhaust gases, or from ducted fans connected to the gas turbines.[38] Jet engines that produce thrust from the direct impulse of exhaust gases are often called turbojets. While still in service with many militaries and civilian operators, turbojets have mostly been phased out in favor of the turbofan engine due to the turbojet's low fuel efficiency, and high noise.[24] Those that generate thrust with the addition of a ducted fan are called turbofans or (rarely) fan-jets. These engines produce nearly 80% of their thrust by the ducted fan, which can be seen from the front of the engine. They come in two types, low-bypass turbofan and high bypass, the difference being the amount of air moved by the fan, called "bypass air". These engines offer the benefit of more thrust without extra fuel consumption.[24][25]

Gas turbines are also used in many liquid-fuel rockets, where gas turbines are used to power a turbopump to permit the use of lightweight, low-pressure tanks, reducing the empty weight of the rocket.

Turboprop engines

A turboprop engine is a turbine engine that drives an aircraft propeller using a reduction gear to translate high turbine section operating speed (often in the 10s of thousands) into low thousands necessary for efficient propeller operation. The benefit of using the turboprop engine is to take advantage of the turbine engines high power-to-weight ratio to drive a propeller, thus allowing a more powerful, but also smaller engine to be used.[25] Turboprop engines are used on a wide range of business aircraft such as the Pilatus PC-12, commuter aircraft such as the Beechcraft 1900, and small cargo aircraft such as the Cessna 208 Caravan or De Havilland Canada Dash 8, and large aircraft (typically military) such as the Airbus A400M transport, Lockheed AC-130 and the 60-year-old Tupolev Tu-95 strategic bomber. While military turboprop engines can vary, in the civilian market there are two primary engines to be found: the Pratt & Whitney Canada PT6, a free-turbine turboshaft engine, and the Honeywell TPE331, a fixed turbine engine (formerly designated as the Garrett AiResearch 331).

Aeroderivative gas turbines

An LM6000 in an electrical power plant application

Aeroderivative gas turbines are generally based on existing aircraft gas turbine engines and are smaller and lighter than industrial gas turbines.[39]

Aeroderivatives are used in electrical power generation due to their ability to be shut down and handle load changes more quickly than industrial machines.[40] They are also used in the marine industry to reduce weight. Common types include the General Electric LM2500, General Electric LM6000, and aeroderivative versions of the Pratt & Whitney PW4000 and Rolls-Royce RB211.[39]

Amateur gas turbines

Increasing numbers of gas turbines are being used or even constructed by amateurs.

In its most straightforward form, these are commercial turbines acquired through military surplus or scrapyard sales, then operated for display as part of the hobby of engine collecting.[41][42] In its most extreme form, amateurs have even rebuilt engines beyond professional repair and then used them to compete for the land speed record.

The simplest form of self-constructed gas turbine employs an automotive turbocharger as the core component. A combustion chamber is fabricated and plumbed between the compressor and turbine sections.[43]

More sophisticated turbojets are also built, where their thrust and light weight are sufficient to power large model aircraft.[44] The Schreckling design[44] constructs the entire engine from raw materials, including the fabrication of a centrifugal compressor wheel from plywood, epoxy and wrapped carbon fibre strands.

Several small companies now manufacture small turbines and parts for the amateur. Most turbojet-powered model aircraft are now using these commercial and semi-commercial microturbines, rather than a Schreckling-like home-build.[45]

Auxiliary power units

Small gas turbines are used as auxiliary power units (APUs) to supply auxiliary power to larger, mobile, machines such as an aircraft, and are a turboshaftdesign.[24] They supply:

  • compressed air for air cycle machine style air conditioning and ventilation,
  • compressed air start-up power for larger jet engines,
  • mechanical (shaft) power to a gearbox to drive shafted accessories, and
  • electrical, hydraulic and other power-transmission sources to consuming devices remote from the APU.

Industrial gas turbines for power generation

Gateway Generating Station, a combined-cycle gas-fired power station in California, uses two GE 7F.04 combustion turbines to burn natural gas.
GE H series power generation gas turbine: in combined cycle configuration, its highest thermodynamic efficiency is 62.22%
See also: Gas-fired power plant

Industrial gas turbines differ from aeronautical designs in that the frames, bearings, and blading are of heavier construction. They are also much more closely integrated with the devices they power—often an electric generator—and the secondary-energy equipment that is used to recover residual energy (largely heat).

They range in size from portable mobile plants to large, complex systems weighing more than a hundred tonnes housed in purpose-built buildings. When the gas turbine is used solely for shaft power, its thermal efficiency is about 30%. However, it may be cheaper to buy electricity than to generate it. Therefore, many engines are used in CHP (Combined Heat and Power) configurations that can be small enough to be integrated into portable container configurations.

Gas turbines can be particularly efficient when waste heat from the turbine is recovered by a heat recovery steam generator (HRSG) to power a conventional steam turbine in a combined cycle configuration.[46] The 605 MW General Electric 9HA achieved a 62.22% efficiency rate with temperatures as high as 1,540 °C (2,800 °F).[47] For 2018, GE offers its 826 MW HA at over 64% efficiency in combined cycle due to advances in additive manufacturing and combustion breakthroughs, up from 63.7% in 2017 orders and on track to achieve 65% by the early 2020s.[48] In March 2018, GE Power achieved a 63.08% gross efficiency for its 7HA turbine.[49]

Aeroderivative gas turbines can also be used in combined cycles, leading to a higher efficiency, but it will not be as high as a specifically designed industrial gas turbine. They can also be run in a cogeneration configuration: the exhaust is used for space or water heating, or drives an absorption chiller for cooling the inlet air and increase the power output, technology known as turbine inlet air cooling.

Another significant advantage is their ability to be turned on and off within minutes, supplying power during peak, or unscheduled, demand. Since single cycle (gas turbine only) power plants are less efficient than combined cycle plants, they are usually used as peaking power plants, which operate anywhere from several hours per day to a few dozen hours per year—depending on the electricity demand and the generating capacity of the region. In areas with a shortage of base-load and load following power plant capacity or with low fuel costs, a gas turbine powerplant may regularly operate most hours of the day. A large single-cycle gas turbine typically produces 100 to 400 megawatts of electric power and has 35–40% thermodynamic efficiency.[50]

Industrial gas turbines for mechanical drive

Industrial gas turbines that are used solely for mechanical drive or used in collaboration with a recovery steam generator differ from power generating sets in that they are often smaller and feature a dual shaft design as opposed to a single shaft. The power range varies from 1 megawatt up to 50 megawatts.[citation needed] These engines are connected directly or via a gearbox to either a pump or compressor assembly. The majority of installations are used within the oil and gas industries. Mechanical drive applications increase efficiency by around 2%.

Oil and gas platforms require these engines to drive compressors to inject gas into the wells to force oil up via another bore, or to compress the gas for transportation. They are also often used to provide power for the platform. These platforms do not need to use the engine in collaboration with a CHP system due to getting the gas at an extremely reduced cost (often free from burn off gas). The same companies use pump sets to drive the fluids to land and across pipelines in various intervals.

Compressed air energy storage

Main page: Engineering:Compressed air energy storage

One modern development seeks to improve efficiency in another way, by separating the compressor and the turbine with a compressed air store. In a conventional turbine, up to half the generated power is used driving the compressor. In a compressed air energy storage configuration, power, perhaps from a wind farm or bought on the open market at a time of low demand and low price, is used to drive the compressor, and the compressed air released to operate the turbine when required.

Turboshaft engines

Main page: Engineering:Turboshaft

Turboshaft engines are used to drive compressors in gas pumping stations and natural gas liquefaction plants. They are also used in aviation to power all but the smallest modern helicopters, and function as an auxiliary power unit in large commercial aircraft. A primary shaft carries the compressor and its turbine which, together with a combustor, is called a Gas Generator. A separately spinning power-turbine is usually used to drive the rotor on helicopters. Allowing the gas generator and power turbine/rotor to spin at their own speeds allows more flexibility in their design.

Radial gas turbines

Main page: Engineering:Radial turbine

Scale jet engines

Scale jet engines are scaled down versions of this early full scale engine

Also known as miniature gas turbines or micro-jets.

With this in mind the pioneer of modern Micro-Jets, Kurt Schreckling, produced one of the world's first Micro-Turbines, the FD3/67.[44] This engine can produce up to 22 newtons of thrust, and can be built by most mechanically minded people with basic engineering tools, such as a metal lathe.[44]

Microturbines

Main page: Engineering:Microturbine

Evolved from piston engine turbochargers, aircraft APUs or small jet engines, microturbines are 25 to 500 kilowatt turbines the size of a refrigerator. Microturbines have around 15% efficiencies without a recuperator, 20 to 30% with one and they can reach 85% combined thermal-electrical efficiency in cogeneration.[51]

External combustion

Most gas turbines are internal combustion engines but it is also possible to manufacture an external combustion gas turbine which is, effectively, a turbine version of a hot air engine. Those systems are usually indicated as EFGT (Externally Fired Gas Turbine) or IFGT (Indirectly Fired Gas Turbine).

External combustion has been used for the purpose of using pulverized coal or finely ground biomass (such as sawdust) as a fuel. In the indirect system, a heat exchanger is used and only clean air with no combustion products travels through the power turbine. The thermal efficiency is lower in the indirect type of external combustion; however, the turbine blades are not subjected to combustion products and much lower quality (and therefore cheaper) fuels are able to be used.

When external combustion is used, it is possible to use exhaust air from the turbine as the primary combustion air. This effectively reduces global heat losses, although heat losses associated with the combustion exhaust remain inevitable.

Closed-cycle gas turbines based on helium or supercritical carbon dioxide also hold promise for use with future high temperature solar and nuclear power generation.

In surface vehicles

MAZ-7907, a transporter erector launcher with a turbine-electric transmission

Gas turbines are often used on ships, locomotives, helicopters, tanks, and to a lesser extent, on cars, buses, and motorcycles.

A key advantage of jets and turboprops for airplane propulsion – their superior performance at high altitude compared to piston engines, particularly naturally aspirated ones – is irrelevant in most automobile applications. Their power-to-weight advantage, though less critical than for aircraft, is still important.

Gas turbines offer a high-powered engine in a very small and light package. However, they are not as responsive and efficient as small piston engines over the wide range of RPMs and powers needed in vehicle applications. In series hybrid vehicles, as the driving electric motors are mechanically detached from the electricity generating engine, the responsiveness, poor performance at low speed and low efficiency at low output problems are much less important. The turbine can be run at optimum speed for its power output, and batteries and ultracapacitors can supply power as needed, with the engine cycled on and off to run it only at high efficiency. The emergence of the continuously variable transmission may also alleviate the responsiveness problem.

Turbines have historically been more expensive to produce than piston engines, though this is partly because piston engines have been mass-produced in huge quantities for decades, while small gas turbine engines are rarities; however, turbines are mass-produced in the closely related form of the turbocharger.

The turbocharger is basically a compact and simple free shaft radial gas turbine which is driven by the piston engine's exhaust gas. The centripetal turbine wheel drives a centrifugal compressor wheel through a common rotating shaft. This wheel supercharges the engine air intake to a degree that can be controlled by means of a wastegate or by dynamically modifying the turbine housing's geometry (as in a variable geometry turbocharger). It mainly serves as a power recovery device which converts a great deal of otherwise wasted thermal and kinetic energy into engine boost.

Turbo-compound engines (actually employed on some semi-trailer trucks) are fitted with blow down turbines which are similar in design and appearance to a turbocharger except for the turbine shaft being mechanically or hydraulically connected to the engine's crankshaft instead of to a centrifugal compressor, thus providing additional power instead of boost. While the turbocharger is a pressure turbine, a power recovery turbine is a velocity one.[citation needed]

Passenger road vehicles (cars, bikes, and buses)

A number of experiments have been conducted with gas turbine powered automobiles, the largest by Chrysler.[52][53] More recently, there has been some interest in the use of turbine engines for hybrid electric cars. For instance, a consortium led by micro gas turbine company Bladon Jets has secured investment from the Technology Strategy Board to develop an Ultra Lightweight Range Extender (ULRE) for next-generation electric vehicles. The objective of the consortium, which includes luxury car maker Jaguar Land Rover and leading electrical machine company SR Drives, is to produce the world's first commercially viable – and environmentally friendly – gas turbine generator designed specifically for automotive applications.[54]

The common turbocharger for gasoline or diesel engines is also a turbine derivative.

Concept cars

The 1950 Rover JET1

The first serious investigation of using a gas turbine in cars was in 1946 when two engineers, Robert Kafka and Robert Engerstein of Carney Associates, a New York engineering firm, came up with the concept where a unique compact turbine engine design would provide power for a rear wheel drive car. After an article appeared in Popular Science, there was no further work, beyond the paper stage.[55]

Early concepts (1950s/60s)

In 1950, designer F.R. Bell and Chief Engineer Maurice Wilks from British car manufacturers Rover unveiled the first car powered with a gas turbine engine. The two-seater JET1 had the engine positioned behind the seats, air intake grilles on either side of the car, and exhaust outlets on the top of the tail. During tests, the car reached top speeds of 140 km/h (87 mph), at a turbine speed of 50,000 rpm. After being shown in the United Kingdom and the United States in 1950, JET1 was further developed, and was subjected to speed trials on the Jabbeke highway in Belgium in June 1952, where it exceeded 240 km/h (150 mph).[56] The car ran on petrol, paraffin (kerosene) or diesel oil, but fuel consumption problems proved insurmountable for a production car. JET1 is on display at the London Science Museum.

A French turbine-powered car, the SOCEMA-Grégoire, was displayed at the October 1952 Paris Auto Show. It was designed by the French engineer Jean-Albert Grégoire.[57]

GM Firebird I

The first turbine-powered car built in the US was the GM Firebird I which began evaluations in 1953. While photos of the Firebird I may suggest that the jet turbine's thrust propelled the car like an aircraft, the turbine actually drove the rear wheels. The Firebird I was never meant as a commercial passenger car and was built solely for testing & evaluation as well as public relation purposes.[58] Additional Firebird concept cars, each powered by gas turbines, were developed for the 1953, 1956 and 1959 Motorama auto shows. The GM Research gas turbine engine also was fitted to a series of transit buses, starting with the Turbo-Cruiser I of 1953.[59]

Engine compartment of a Chrysler 1963 Turbine car

Starting in 1954 with a modified Plymouth,[60] the American car manufacturer Chrysler demonstrated several prototype gas turbine-powered cars from the early 1950s through the early 1980s. Chrysler built fifty Chrysler Turbine Cars in 1963 and conducted the only consumer trial of gas turbine-powered cars.[61] Each of their turbines employed a unique rotating recuperator, referred to as a regenerator that increased efficiency.[60]

In 1954, Fiat unveiled a concept car with a turbine engine, called Fiat Turbina. This vehicle, looking like an aircraft with wheels, used a unique combination of both jet thrust and the engine driving the wheels. Speeds of 282 km/h (175 mph) were claimed.[62]

In the 1960s, Ford and GM also were developing gas turbine semi-trucks. Ford displayed the Big Red at the 1964 World's Fair.[63] With the trailer, it was 29 m (96 ft) long, 4.0 m (13 ft) high, and painted crimson red. It contained the Ford-developed gas turbine engine, with output power and torque of 450 kW (600 hp) and 1,160 N⋅m (855 lb⋅ft). The cab boasted a highway map of the continental U.S., a mini-kitchen, bathroom, and a TV for the co-driver. The fate of the truck was unknown for several decades, but it was rediscovered in early 2021 in private hands, having been restored to running order.[64][65] The Chevrolet division of GM built the Turbo Titan series of concept trucks with turbine motors as analogs of the Firebird concepts, including Turbo Titan I (c. 1959, shares GT-304 engine with Firebird II), Turbo Titan II (c. 1962, shares GT-305 engine with Firebird III), and Turbo Titan III (1965, GT-309 engine); in addition, the GM Bison gas turbine truck was shown at the 1964 World's Fair.[66]

Emissions and fuel economy (1970s/80s)

As a result of the U.S. Clean Air Act Amendments of 1970, research was funded into developing automotive gas turbine technology.[67] Design concepts and vehicles were conducted by Chrysler, General Motors, Ford (in collaboration with AiResearch), and American Motors (in conjunction with Williams Research).[68] Long-term tests were conducted to evaluate comparable cost efficiency.[69] Several AMC Hornets were powered by a small Williams regenerative gas turbine weighing 250 lb (113 kg) and producing 80 hp (60 kW; 81 PS) at 4450 rpm.[70][71][72]

In 1982, General Motors used an Oldsmobile Delta 88 powered by a gas turbine using pulverised coal dust. This was considered for the United States and the western world to reduce dependence on middle east oil at the time[73][74][75]

Toyota demonstrated several gas turbine powered concept cars, such as the Century gas turbine hybrid in 1975, the Sports 800 Gas Turbine Hybrid in 1979 and the GTV in 1985. No production vehicles were made. The GT24 engine was exhibited in 1977 without a vehicle.

Later development

In the early 1990s, Volvo introduced the Volvo ECC which was a gas turbine powered hybrid electric vehicle.[76]

In 1993 General Motors introduced the first commercial gas turbine powered hybrid vehicle—as a limited production run of the EV-1 series hybrid. A Williams International 40 kW turbine drove an alternator which powered the battery-electric powertrain. The turbine design included a recuperator. In 2006, GM went into the EcoJet concept car project with Jay Leno.

At the 2010 Paris Motor Show Jaguar demonstrated its Jaguar C-X75 concept car. This electrically powered supercar has a top speed of 204 mph (328 km/h) and can go from 0 to 62 mph (0 to 100 km/h) in 3.4 seconds. It uses Lithium-ion batteries to power four electric motors which combine to produce 780 bhp. It will travel 68 miles (109 km) on a single charge of the batteries, and uses a pair of Bladon Micro Gas Turbines to re-charge the batteries extending the range to 560 miles (900 km).[77]

Racing cars

The 1967 STP Oil Treatment Special on display at the Indianapolis Motor Speedway Hall of Fame Museum, with the Pratt & Whitney gas turbine shown
A 1968 Howmet TX, the only turbine-powered race car to have won a race

The first race car (in concept only) fitted with a turbine was in 1955 by a US Air Force group as a hobby project with a turbine loaned them by Boeing and a race car owned by Firestone Tire & Rubber company.[78] The first race car fitted with a turbine for the goal of actual racing was by Rover and the BRM Formula One team joined forces to produce the Rover-BRM, a gas turbine powered coupe, which entered the 1963 24 Hours of Le Mans, driven by Graham Hill and Richie Ginther. It averaged 107.8 mph (173.5 km/h) and had a top speed of 142 mph (229 km/h). American Ray Heppenstall joined Howmet Corporation and McKee Engineering together to develop their own gas turbine sports car in 1968, the Howmet TX, which ran several American and European events, including two wins, and also participated in the 1968 24 Hours of Le Mans. The cars used Continental gas turbines, which eventually set six FIA land speed records for turbine-powered cars.[79]

For open wheel racing, 1967's revolutionary STP-Paxton Turbocar fielded by racing and entrepreneurial legend Andy Granatelli and driven by Parnelli Jones nearly won the Indianapolis 500; the Pratt & Whitney ST6B-62 powered turbine car was almost a lap ahead of the second place car when a gearbox bearing failed just three laps from the finish line. The next year the STP Lotus 56 turbine car won the Indianapolis 500 pole position even though new rules restricted the air intake dramatically. In 1971 Team Lotus principal Colin Chapman introduced the Lotus 56B F1 car, powered by a Pratt & Whitney STN 6/76 gas turbine. Chapman had a reputation of building radical championship-winning cars, but had to abandon the project because there were too many problems with turbo lag.

Buses

General Motors fitted the GT-30x series of gas turbines (branded "Whirlfire") to several prototype buses in the 1950s and 1960s, including Turbo-Cruiser I (1953, GT-300); Turbo-Cruiser II (1964, GT-309); Turbo-Cruiser III (1968, GT-309); RTX (1968, GT-309); and RTS 3T (1972).[80]

The arrival of the Capstone Turbine has led to several hybrid bus designs, starting with HEV-1 by AVS of Chattanooga, Tennessee in 1999, and closely followed by Ebus and ISE Research in California, and DesignLine Corporation in New Zealand (and later the United States). AVS turbine hybrids were plagued with reliability and quality control problems, resulting in liquidation of AVS in 2003. The most successful design by Designline is now operated in 5 cities in 6 countries, with over 30 buses in operation worldwide, and order for several hundred being delivered to Baltimore, and New York City.

Brescia Italy is using serial hybrid buses powered by microturbines on routes through the historical sections of the city.[81]

Motorcycles

The MTT Turbine Superbike appeared in 2000 (hence the designation of Y2K Superbike by MTT) and is the first production motorcycle powered by a turbine engine – specifically, a Rolls-Royce Allison model 250 turboshaft engine, producing about 283 kW (380 bhp). Speed-tested to 365 km/h or 227 mph (according to some stories, the testing team ran out of road during the test), it holds the Guinness World Record for most powerful production motorcycle and most expensive production motorcycle, with a price tag of US$185,000.

Trains

Main page: Engineering:Gas turbine locomotive

Several locomotive classes have been powered by gas turbines, the most recent incarnation being Bombardier's JetTrain.

Tanks

Marines from 1st Tank Battalion load a Honeywell AGT1500 multi-fuel turbine back into an M1 Abrams tank at Camp Coyote, Kuwait, February 2003

The Third Reich Wehrmacht Heer's development division, the Heereswaffenamt (Army Ordnance Board), studied a number of gas turbine engine designs for use in tanks starting in mid-1944. The first gas turbine engine design intended for use in armored fighting vehicle propulsion, the BMW 003-based GT 101, was meant for installation in the Panther tank.[82] Towards the end of the war, a Jagdtiger was fitted with one of the aforementioned gas turbines.[83]

The second use of a gas turbine in an armored fighting vehicle was in 1954 when a unit, PU2979, specifically developed for tanks by C. A. Parsons and Company, was installed and trialed in a British Conqueror tank.[84] The Stridsvagn 103 was developed in the 1950s and was the first mass-produced main battle tank to use a turbine engine, the Boeing T50. Since then, gas turbine engines have been used as auxiliary power units in some tanks and as main powerplants in Soviet/Russian T-80s and U.S. M1 Abrams tanks, among others. They are lighter and smaller than diesel engines at the same sustained power output but the models installed to date are less fuel efficient than the equivalent diesel, especially at idle, requiring more fuel to achieve the same combat range. Successive models of M1 have addressed this problem with battery packs or secondary generators to power the tank's systems while stationary, saving fuel by reducing the need to idle the main turbine. T-80s can mount three large external fuel drums to extend their range. Russia has stopped production of the T-80 in favor of the diesel-powered T-90 (based on the T-72), while Ukraine has developed the diesel-powered T-80UD and T-84 with nearly the power of the gas-turbine tank. The French Leclerc tank's diesel powerplant features the "Hyperbar" hybrid supercharging system, where the engine's turbocharger is completely replaced with a small gas turbine which also works as an assisted diesel exhaust turbocharger, enabling engine RPM-independent boost level control and a higher peak boost pressure to be reached (than with ordinary turbochargers). This system allows a smaller displacement and lighter engine to be used as the tank's power plant and effectively removes turbo lag. This special gas turbine/turbocharger can also work independently from the main engine as an ordinary APU.

A turbine is theoretically more reliable and easier to maintain than a piston engine since it has a simpler construction with fewer moving parts, but in practice, turbine parts experience a higher wear rate due to their higher working speeds. The turbine blades are highly sensitive to dust and fine sand so that in desert operations air filters have to be fitted and changed several times daily. An improperly fitted filter, or a bullet or shell fragment that punctures the filter, can damage the engine. Piston engines (especially if turbocharged) also need well-maintained filters, but they are more resilient if the filter does fail.

Like most modern diesel engines used in tanks, gas turbines are usually multi-fuel engines.

Marine applications

Main page: Engineering:Marine propulsion

Naval

The Gas turbine from MGB 2009

Gas turbines are used in many naval vessels, where they are valued for their high power-to-weight ratio and their ships' resulting acceleration and ability to get underway quickly.

The first gas-turbine-powered naval vessel was the Royal Navy's motor gunboat MGB 2009 (formerly MGB 509) converted in 1947. Metropolitan-Vickers fitted their F2/3 jet engine with a power turbine. The Steam Gun Boat Grey Goose was converted to Rolls-Royce gas turbines in 1952 and operated as such from 1953.[85] The Bold class Fast Patrol Boats Bold Pioneer and Bold Pathfinder built in 1953 were the first ships created specifically for gas turbine propulsion.[86]

The first large-scale, partially gas-turbine powered ships were the Royal Navy's Type 81 (Tribal class) frigates with combined steam and gas powerplants. The first, HMS Ashanti was commissioned in 1961.

The German Navy launched the first Köln-class frigate in 1961 with 2 Brown, Boveri & Cie gas turbines in the world's first combined diesel and gas propulsion system.

The Soviet Navy commissioned in 1962 the first of 25 Kashin-class destroyer with 4 gas turbines in combined gas and gas propulsion system. Those vessels used 4 M8E gas turbines, which generated 54,000–72,000 kW (72,000–96,000 hp). Those ships were the first large ships in the world to be powered solely by gas turbines.

Project 61 large ASW ship, Kashin-class destroyer

The Danish Navy had 6 Søløven-class torpedo boats (the export version of the British Brave class fast patrol boat) in service from 1965 to 1990, which had 3 Bristol Proteus (later RR Proteus) Marine Gas Turbines rated at 9,510 kW (12,750 shp) combined, plus two General Motors Diesel engines, rated at 340 kW (460 shp), for better fuel economy at slower speeds.[87] And they also produced 10 Willemoes Class Torpedo / Guided Missile boats (in service from 1974 to 2000) which had 3 Rolls-Royce Marine Proteus Gas Turbines also rated at 9,510 kW (12,750 shp), same as the Søløven-class boats, and 2 General Motors Diesel Engines, rated at 600 kW (800 shp), also for improved fuel economy at slow speeds.[88]

The Swedish Navy produced 6 Spica-class torpedo boats between 1966 and 1967 powered by 3 Bristol Siddeley Proteus 1282 turbines, each delivering 3,210 kW (4,300 shp). They were later joined by 12 upgraded Norrköping class ships, still with the same engines. With their aft torpedo tubes replaced by antishipping missiles they served as missile boats until the last was retired in 2005.[89]

The Finnish Navy commissioned two Turunmaa-class corvettes, Turunmaa and Karjala, in 1968. They were equipped with one 16,410 kW (22,000 shp) Rolls-Royce Olympus TM1 gas turbine and three Wärtsilä marine diesels for slower speeds. They were the fastest vessels in the Finnish Navy; they regularly achieved speeds of 35 knots, and 37.3 knots during sea trials. The Turunmaas were decommissioned in 2002. Karjala is today a museum ship in Turku, and Turunmaa serves as a floating machine shop and training ship for Satakunta Polytechnical College.

The next series of major naval vessels were the four Canadian Iroquois-class helicopter carrying destroyers first commissioned in 1972. They used 2 ft-4 main propulsion engines, 2 ft-12 cruise engines and 3 Solar Saturn 750 kW generators.

An LM2500 gas turbine on USS Ford

The first U.S. gas-turbine powered ship was the U.S. Coast Guard's Point Thatcher, a cutter commissioned in 1961 that was powered by two 750 kW (1,000 shp) turbines utilizing controllable-pitch propellers.[90] The larger Hamilton-class High Endurance Cutters, was the first class of larger cutters to utilize gas turbines, the first of which (USCGC Hamilton) was commissioned in 1967. Since then, they have powered the U.S. Navy's Oliver Hazard Perry-class frigates, Spruance and Arleigh Burke-class destroyers, and Ticonderoga-class guided missile cruisers. USS Makin Island, a modified Wasp-class amphibious assault ship, is to be the Navy's first amphibious assault ship powered by gas turbines. The marine gas turbine operates in a more corrosive atmosphere due to the presence of sea salt in air and fuel and use of cheaper fuels.

Civilian maritime

Up to the late 1940s, much of the progress on marine gas turbines all over the world took place in design offices and engine builder's workshops and development work was led by the British Royal Navy and other Navies. While interest in the gas turbine for marine purposes, both naval and mercantile, continued to increase, the lack of availability of the results of operating experience on early gas turbine projects limited the number of new ventures on seagoing commercial vessels being embarked upon.

In 1951, the Diesel-electric oil tanker Auris, 12,290 deadweight tonnage (DWT) was used to obtain operating experience with a main propulsion gas turbine under service conditions at sea and so became the first ocean-going merchant ship to be powered by a gas turbine. Built by Hawthorn Leslie at Hebburn-on-Tyne, UK, in accordance with plans and specifications drawn up by the Anglo-Saxon Petroleum Company and launched on the UK's Princess Elizabeth's 21st birthday in 1947, the ship was designed with an engine room layout that would allow for the experimental use of heavy fuel in one of its high-speed engines, as well as the future substitution of one of its diesel engines by a gas turbine.[91] The Auris operated commercially as a tanker for three-and-a-half years with a diesel-electric propulsion unit as originally commissioned, but in 1951 one of its four 824 kW (1,105 bhp) diesel engines – which were known as "Faith", "Hope", "Charity" and "Prudence" – was replaced by the world's first marine gas turbine engine, a 890 kW (1,200 bhp) open-cycle gas turbo-alternator built by British Thompson-Houston Company in Rugby. Following successful sea trials off the Northumbrian coast, the Auris set sail from Hebburn-on-Tyne in October 1951 bound for Port Arthur in the US and then Curacao in the southern Caribbean returning to Avonmouth after 44 days at sea, successfully completing her historic trans-Atlantic crossing. During this time at sea the gas turbine burnt diesel fuel and operated without an involuntary stop or mechanical difficulty of any kind. She subsequently visited Swansea, Hull, Rotterdam, Oslo and Southampton covering a total of 13,211 nautical miles. The Auris then had all of its power plants replaced with a 3,910 kW (5,250 shp) directly coupled gas turbine to become the first civilian ship to operate solely on gas turbine power.

Despite the success of this early experimental voyage the gas turbine did not replace the diesel engine as the propulsion plant for large merchant ships. At constant cruising speeds the diesel engine simply had no peer in the vital area of fuel economy. The gas turbine did have more success in Royal Navy ships and the other naval fleets of the world where sudden and rapid changes of speed are required by warships in action.[92]

The United States Maritime Commission were looking for options to update WWII Liberty ships, and heavy-duty gas turbines were one of those selected. In 1956 the John Sergeant was lengthened and equipped with a General Electric 4,900 kW (6,600 shp) HD gas turbine with exhaust-gas regeneration, reduction gearing and a variable-pitch propeller. It operated for 9,700 hours using residual fuel (Bunker C) for 7,000 hours. Fuel efficiency was on a par with steam propulsion at 0.318 kg/kW (0.523 lb/hp) per hour,[93] and power output was higher than expected at 5,603 kW (7,514 shp) due to the ambient temperature of the North Sea route being lower than the design temperature of the gas turbine. This gave the ship a speed capability of 18 knots, up from 11 knots with the original power plant, and well in excess of the 15 knot targeted. The ship made its first transatlantic crossing with an average speed of 16.8 knots, in spite of some rough weather along the way. Suitable Bunker C fuel was only available at limited ports because the quality of the fuel was of a critical nature. The fuel oil also had to be treated on board to reduce contaminants and this was a labor-intensive process that was not suitable for automation at the time. Ultimately, the variable-pitch propeller, which was of a new and untested design, ended the trial, as three consecutive annual inspections revealed stress-cracking. This did not reflect poorly on the marine-propulsion gas-turbine concept though, and the trial was a success overall. The success of this trial opened the way for more development by GE on the use of HD gas turbines for marine use with heavy fuels.[94] The John Sergeant was scrapped in 1972 at Portsmouth PA.

Boeing Jetfoil 929-100-007 Urzela of TurboJET

Boeing launched its first passenger-carrying waterjet-propelled hydrofoil Boeing 929, in April 1974. Those ships were powered by two Allison 501-KF gas turbines.[95]

Between 1971 and 1981, Seatrain Lines operated a scheduled container service between ports on the eastern seaboard of the United States and ports in northwest Europe across the North Atlantic with four container ships of 26,000 tonnes DWT. Those ships were powered by twin Pratt & Whitney gas turbines of the FT 4 series. The four ships in the class were named Euroliner, Eurofreighter, Asialiner and Asiafreighter. Following the dramatic Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) price increases of the mid-1970s, operations were constrained by rising fuel costs. Some modification of the engine systems on those ships was undertaken to permit the burning of a lower grade of fuel (i.e., marine diesel). Reduction of fuel costs was successful using a different untested fuel in a marine gas turbine but maintenance costs increased with the fuel change. After 1981 the ships were sold and refitted with, what at the time, was more economical diesel-fueled engines but the increased engine size reduced cargo space.[citation needed]

The first passenger ferry to use a gas turbine was the GTS Finnjet, built in 1977 and powered by two Pratt & Whitney FT 4C-1 DLF turbines, generating 55,000 kW (74,000 shp) and propelling the ship to a speed of 31 knots. However, the Finnjet also illustrated the shortcomings of gas turbine propulsion in commercial craft, as high fuel prices made operating her unprofitable. After four years of service, additional diesel engines were installed on the ship to reduce running costs during the off-season. The Finnjet was also the first ship with a combined diesel-electric and gas propulsion. Another example of commercial use of gas turbines in a passenger ship is Stena Line's HSS class fastcraft ferries. HSS 1500-class Stena Explorer, Stena Voyager and Stena Discovery vessels use combined gas and gas setups of twin GE LM2500 plus GE LM1600 power for a total of 68,000 kW (91,000 shp). The slightly smaller HSS 900-class Stena Carisma, uses twin ABB–STAL GT35 turbines rated at 34,000 kW (46,000 shp) gross. The Stena Discovery was withdrawn from service in 2007, another victim of too high fuel costs.[citation needed]

In July 2000 the Millennium became the first cruise ship to be powered by both gas and steam turbines. The ship featured two General Electric LM2500 gas turbine generators whose exhaust heat was used to operate a steam turbine generator in a COGES (combined gas electric and steam) configuration. Propulsion was provided by two electrically driven Rolls-Royce Mermaid azimuth pods. The liner RMS Queen Mary 2 uses a combined diesel and gas configuration.[96]

In marine racing applications the 2010 C5000 Mystic catamaran Miss GEICO uses two Lycoming T-55 turbines for its power system.[citation needed]

Advances in technology

Gas turbine technology has steadily advanced since its inception and continues to evolve. Development is actively producing both smaller gas turbines and more powerful and efficient engines. Aiding in these advances are computer-based design (specifically computational fluid dynamics and finite element analysis) and the development of advanced materials: Base materials with superior high-temperature strength (e.g., single-crystal superalloys that exhibit yield strength anomaly) or thermal barrier coatings that protect the structural material from ever-higher temperatures. These advances allow higher compression ratios and turbine inlet temperatures, more efficient combustion and better cooling of engine parts.

Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) has contributed to substantial improvements in the performance and efficiency of gas turbine engine components through enhanced understanding of the complex viscous flow and heat transfer phenomena involved. For this reason, CFD is one of the key computational tools used in design and development of gas[97][98] turbine engines.

The simple-cycle efficiencies of early gas turbines were practically doubled by incorporating inter-cooling, regeneration (or recuperation), and reheating. These improvements, of course, come at the expense of increased initial and operation costs, and they cannot be justified unless the decrease in fuel costs offsets the increase in other costs. The relatively low fuel prices, the general desire in the industry to minimize installation costs, and the tremendous increase in the simple-cycle efficiency to about 40 percent left little desire for opting for these modifications.[99]

On the emissions side, the challenge is to increase turbine inlet temperatures while at the same time reducing peak flame temperature in order to achieve lower NOx emissions and meet the latest emission regulations. In May 2011, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries achieved a turbine inlet temperature of 1,600 °C on a 320 megawatt gas turbine, and 460 MW in gas turbine combined-cycle power generation applications in which gross thermal efficiency exceeds 60%.[100]

Compliant foil bearings were commercially introduced to gas turbines in the 1990s. These can withstand over a hundred thousand start/stop cycles and have eliminated the need for an oil system. The application of microelectronics and power switching technology have enabled the development of commercially viable electricity generation by microturbines for distribution and vehicle propulsion.

Advantages and disadvantages

The following are advantages and disadvantages of gas-turbine engines:[101]

Advantages include:

  • Very high power-to-weight ratio compared to reciprocating engines.
  • Smaller than most reciprocating engines of the same power rating.
  • Smooth rotation of the main shaft produces far less vibration than a reciprocating engine.
  • Fewer moving parts than reciprocating engines results in lower maintenance cost and higher reliability/availability over its service life.
  • Greater reliability, particularly in applications where sustained high power output is required.
  • Waste heat is dissipated almost entirely in the exhaust. This results in a high-temperature exhaust stream that is very usable for boiling water in a combined cycle, or for cogeneration.
  • Lower peak combustion pressures than reciprocating engines in general.
  • High shaft speeds in smaller "free turbine units", although larger gas turbines employed in power generation operate at synchronous speeds.
  • Low lubricating oil cost and consumption.
  • Can run on a wide variety of fuels.
  • Very low toxic emissions of CO and HC due to excess air, complete combustion and no "quench" of the flame on cold surfaces.

Disadvantages include:

  • Core engine costs can be high due to use of exotic materials.
  • Less efficient than reciprocating engines at idle speed.
  • Longer startup than reciprocating engines.
  • Less responsive to changes in power demand compared with reciprocating engines.
  • Characteristic whine can be hard to suppress.

Major manufacturers

Testing

British, German, other national and international test codes are used to standardize the procedures and definitions used to test gas turbines. Selection of the test code to be used is an agreement between the purchaser and the manufacturer, and has some significance to the design of the turbine and associated systems. In the United States, ASME has produced several performance test codes on gas turbines. This includes ASME PTC 22–2014. These ASME performance test codes have gained international recognition and acceptance for testing gas turbines. The single most important and differentiating characteristic of ASME performance test codes, including PTC 22, is that the test uncertainty of the measurement indicates the quality of the test and is not to be used as a commercial tolerance.

See also

References

  1. Wragg, David W. (1973). A Dictionary of Aviation (first ed.). Osprey. p. 141. ISBN 9780850451634. 
  2. Sonntag, Richard E.; Borgnakke, Claus (2006). Introduction to engineering thermodynamics (Second ed.). John Wiley. ISBN 9780471737599. 
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 Eckardt, Dietrich (2014). "3.2 Early Attempts with the Gas Turbine Principle" (in en). Gas Turbine Powerhouse. Oldenbourg Verlag Munchen. ISBN 9783486735710. 
  4. Zhang, B. (14 December 2014). Lu, Yongxiang. ed. A History of Chinese Science and Technology: Volume 3. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. pp. 308–310. ISBN 978-3662441626. https://books.google.com/books?id=Js_lBAAAQBAJ&pg=PA310. 
  5. "Massachusetts Institute of Technology Gas Turbine Lab". Web.mit.edu. 27 August 1939. http://web.mit.edu/aeroastro/labs/gtl/early_GT_history.html. 
  6. UK patent no. 1833 – Obtaining and Applying Motive Power, & c. A Method of Rising Inflammable Air for the Purposes of Procuring Motion, and Facilitating Metallurgical Operations
  7. "History – Biographies, Landmarks, Patents". ASME. 10 March 1905. http://www.asme.org/Communities/History/Resources/Curtis_Charles_Gordon.cfm. 
  8. 8.0 8.1 Leyes, p.231-232.
  9. Bakken, Lars E et al., p.83-88. "Centenary of the First Gas Turbine to Give Net Power Output: A Tribute to Ægidius Elling". ASME. 2004
  10. Armstrong, F.W (2020). "Farnborough and the Beginnings of Gas Turbine Propulsion". Journal of Aeronautical History (Royal Aeronautical Society). https://www.aerosociety.com/media/13850/paper-2020-02-armstrong-gas-turbines.pdf. 
  11. "Welcome to the Frank Whittle Website". http://www.frankwhittle.co.uk/content.php?act=viewDoc&docId=4&docFatherId=1&level=sub. 
  12. Kreith, Frank, ed (1998). The CRC Handbook of Mechanical Engineering (Second ed.). US: CRC Press. p. 222. ISBN 978-0-8493-9418-8. 
  13. "University of Bochum "In Touch Magazine 2005", p. 5". http://www.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/fem/pdf/in-touch-magazin2005.pdf. 
  14. Brun, Klaus; Kurz, Rainer (2019) (in en). Introduction to Gas Turbine Theory (4 ed.). Solar Turbines Incorporated. pp. 15. ISBN 978-0-578-48386-3. 
  15. John Golley. 1996. "Jet: Frank Whittle and the invention of the jet engine". ISBN:978-1-907472-00-8
  16. Eckardt, D. and Rufli, P. "Advanced Gas Turbine Technology – ABB/ BBC Historical Firsts", ASME J. Eng. Gas Turb. Power, 2002, p. 124, 542–549
  17. Giffard, Hermione (2016-10-10) (in en). Making Jet Engines in World War II: Britain, Germany, and the United States. University of Chicago Press. ISBN 978-0-226-38859-5. https://books.google.com/books?id=BWopDQAAQBAJ&q=%3A+national+gas+turbine+establishment+whittle+and+hayne+constant&pg=PA181. 
  18. Eckardt, D. "Gas Turbine Powerhouse". 2014. ISBN:978-3-11-035962-6
  19. "Post War Advances in Propulsion". The Times: p. 20. 15 June 1953. https://www.thetimes.co.uk/archive/article/1953-06-15/20/2.html?region=global#start%3D1953-06-14%26end%3D1953-06-15%26terms%3Dturbine%26back%3D/tto/archive/find/turbine/w:1953-06-14%7E1953-06-15/1%26next%3D/tto/archive/frame/goto/turbine/w:1953-06-14%7E1953-06-15/2. 
  20. Nunn, Robert H (25 February 1977). The Marine Gas Turbine-The UK Provides a Case Study in Technological Development (Report). US Office of Naval Research. pp. 5. https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a037686.pdf. 
  21. Langston, Lee S. (6 February 2017). "Each Blade a Single Crystal". American Scientist. https://www.americanscientist.org/article/each-blade-a-single-crystal. 
  22. Hada, Satoshi. "Test Results of the World's First 1,600C J-series Gas Turbine". https://www.mhi-global.com/company/technology/review/pdf/e491/e491018.pdf. 
  23. "Gas Turbines breaking the 60% efficiency barrier". 5 January 2010. http://www.cospp.com/articles/print/volume-11/issue-3/features/gas-turbines-breaking.html. 
  24. 24.00 24.01 24.02 24.03 24.04 24.05 24.06 24.07 24.08 24.09 24.10 8083 Aviation Maintenance Technician Handbook–Powerplant Volume 1. USA: Federal Aviation Administration. 2018. ISBN 978-0983865810. https://www.faa.gov/sites/faa.gov/files/regulations_policies/handbooks_manuals/aviation/FAA-H-8083-32-AMT-Powerplant-Vol-1.pdf. 
  25. 25.0 25.1 25.2 A&P Powerplant Textbook (3rd ed.). Jeppeson. 2011. ISBN 978-0884873389. 
  26. Waumans, T.; Vleugels, P.; Peirs, J.; Al-Bender, F.; Reynaerts, D. (2006). "Rotordynamic behaviour of a micro-turbine rotor on air bearings: modelling techniques and experimental verification, p. 182". ISMA. International Conference on Noise and Vibration Engineering. http://www.isma-isaac.be/publications/PMA_MOD_publications/ISMA2006/181-198.pdf. Retrieved 7 January 2013. 
  27. Christopher, John. The Race for Hitler's X-Planes (The Mill, Gloucestershire: History Press, 2013), p.74.
  28. Christopher, p.75.
  29. Nalepa, Krzysztof; Pietkiewicz2, Paweł; Żywica, Grzegorz (November 2009). "Development of the foil bearing technology". Technical Sciences 12: 229–240. doi:10.2478/v10022-009-0019-2. http://www.uwm.edu.pl/wnt/technicalsc/tech_12/B19.pdf. Retrieved 2022-03-01. 
  30. Agrawal, Giri L. (2 June 1997). "Foil Air/Gas Bearing Technology – An Overview". ASME 1997 International Gas Turbine and Aeroengine Congress and Exhibition. pp. V001T04A006. doi:10.1115/97-GT-347. ISBN 978-0-7918-7868-2. http://proceedings.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/proceeding.aspx?articleid=2088143. Retrieved 23 July 2018. 
  31. Hazel, Brian; Rigney, Joe; Gorman, Mark; Boutwell, Brett; Darolia, Ram (2008). "Superalloys 2008 (Eleventh International Symposium)". Superalloys. US: The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society. pp. 753–760. doi:10.7449/2008/Superalloys_2008_753_760. ISBN 978-0-87339-728-5. 
  32. "Coatings for turbine blades"
  33. A. W. James et al. "Gas turbines: operating conditions, components and material requirements"
  34. Tamarin, Y. Protective Coatings for Turbine Blades. 2002. ASM International. pp 3–5
  35. A. Nowotnik "Nickel-Based Superalloys"
  36. Latief, F. H.; Kakehi, K. (2013) "Effects of Re content and crystallographic orientation on creep behavior of aluminized Ni-based single crystal superalloys". Materials & Design 49 : 485–492
  37. Caron P., Khan T. "Evolution of Ni-based superalloys for single crystal gas turbine blade applications"
  38. Dick, Erik (2015). "Thrust Gas Turbines". Fundamentals of Turbomachines 109. 
  39. 39.0 39.1 Robb, Drew (December 1, 2017). "Aeroderivative gas turbines". Turbomachinery International Magazine. https://www.turbomachinerymag.com/aeroderivative-gas-turbines/. 
  40. Smith, R. P. (1996). "Power generation using high efficiency aeroderivative gas turbines". International Conference on Opportunities and Advances in International Electric Power Generation (Conf. Publ. No. 419). Durham, UK. pp. 104–110. doi:10.1049/cp:19960128. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/643453. 
  41. "Vulcan APU startup" (video). http://www.vb.n00bunlimited.net/vBTube.php?do=view&vidid=5iQRdBE3IS0. 
  42. "Bristol Siddeley Proteus". Internal Fire Museum of Power. 1999. http://www.internalfire.com/modules.php?name=Content&pa=showpage&pid=136. 
  43. "Jet Racer". Scrapheap Challenge. Season 6. UK. 2003. Retrieved 13 March 2016.
  44. 44.0 44.1 44.2 44.3 Schreckling, Kurt (1994). Gas Turbines for Model Aircraft. Traplet Publications. ISBN 978-0-9510589-1-6. 
  45. Kamps, Thomas (2005). Model Jet Engines. Traplet Publications. ISBN 978-1-900371-91-9. 
  46. Langston, Lee S. (July 2012). "Efficiency by the Numbers". http://memagazineblog.org/2012/07/01/efficiency-by-the-numbers/. 
  47. Kellner, Tomas (17 June 2016). "Here's Why The Latest Guinness World Record Will Keep France Lit Up Long After Soccer Fans Leave" (Press release). General Electric.
  48. "HA technology now available at industry-first 64 percent efficiency" (Press release). GE Power. 4 December 2017.
  49. "GE's HA Gas Turbine Delivers Second World Record for Efficiency" (Press release). GE Power. March 27, 2018.
  50. Ratliff, Phil; Garbett, Paul; Fischer, Willibald (September 2007). "The New Siemens Gas Turbine SGT5-8000H for More Customer Benefit". VGB PowerTech. Siemens Power Generation. http://www.energy.siemens.com/us/pool/hq/power-generation/gas-turbines/downloads/SGT5-8000H_benefits.pdf. 
  51. Capehart, Barney L. (22 December 2016). "Microturbines". Whole Building Design Guide (National Institute of Building Sciences). https://www.wbdg.org/resources/microturbines. 
  52. "History of Chrysler Corporation Gas Turbine Vehicles" published by the Engineering Section 1979
  53. "Chrysler Corp., Exner Concept Cars 1940 to 1961" undated, retrieved on 11 May 2008.
  54. Bladon Jets And Jaguar Land Rover Win Funding For Gas Turbine Electric Vehicle Project
  55. "Gas Turbines For Autos". Popular Science 146 (8): 121. May 1946. https://books.google.com/books?id=7SADAAAAMBAJ&q=popular+science+May+1946&pg=PA121. Retrieved 13 March 2016. 
  56. Bobbitt, Malcolm (2007). "III – Gas-Turbines and the Jet Era". Rover P4 Series (revised ed.). Dorchester, UK: Veloce Publishing. pp. 84–87. ISBN 978-1-903706-57-2. https://books.google.com/books?id=1sR68p5zDdsC&pg=PA71. Retrieved 17 October 2014. 
  57. Depreux, Stephane (February 2005). "Rétromobile 2005". Classics.com. http://www.classics.com/retro05.html. 
  58. "Gas Turbine Auto". Popular Mechanics 101 (3): 90. March 1954. https://books.google.com/books?id=nNwDAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA90. 
  59. Turunen, W.A.; Collman, J.S. (1966). "The General Motors Research GT-309 Gas Turbine Engine". Transactions. SAE Technical Paper Series (Society of Automotive Engineering) 74: 357–377. doi:10.4271/650714. 
  60. 60.0 60.1 "Turbo Plymouth Threatens Future of Standard". Popular Science 165 (1): 102. July 1954. https://books.google.com/books?id=zSADAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA102. Retrieved 13 March 2016. 
  61. "Chrysler turbine engines and cars". Allpar.com. http://www.allpar.com/mopar/turbine.html. 
  62. "Italy's Turbo Car Hits 175 m.p.h.". Popular Mechanics 165 (1): 120. July 1954. https://books.google.com/books?id=zSADAAAAMBAJ&pg=-PA20. Retrieved 13 March 2016. 
  63. Holderith, Peter (24 March 2021). "We Found Ford's Incredible Turbine-Powered Semi-Truck 'Big Red' That's Been Lost for Decades". The Drive. US. https://www.thedrive.com/news/37925/we-found-fords-incredible-turbine-powered-semi-truck-big-red-thats-been-lost-for-decades. 
  64. " Big Red " Experimental Gas Turbine Semi Truck 1964 New York World's Fair XD10344. Ford Motor Company. 1966. Archived from the original on 2021-10-30. Retrieved 4 September 2020 – via YouTube.
  65. Holderith, Peter (19 August 2020). "Ford's Giant Turbine Semi-Truck 'Big Red' Is Lost Somewhere in the American Southeast". The Drive. US. https://www.thedrive.com/news/35030/fords-giant-turbine-semi-truck-big-red-is-lost-somewhere-in-the-american-southeast. 
  66. Dnistran, Iulian (April 20, 2021). "The story of Turbo Titan - Chevy's long-lost gas turbine truck". TopSpeed. https://www.topspeed.com/cars/the-story-of-turbo-titan-chevy-s-long-lost-gas-turbine-truck-ar191562.html. 
  67. Linden, Lawrence H.; Kumar, Subramanyam; Samuelson, Paul R. (December 1977). Issues in Federally Supported Research on Advanced Automotive Power Systems. Division of Policy Research and Analysis, National Science Foundation. p. 49. 
  68. Linden, page 53.
  69. Verrelli, L. D.; Andary, C. J. (May 1972). "Exhaust Emission Analysis of the Williams Research Gas Turbine AMC Hornet". National Technical Information Service. PB218687. 
  70. Norbye, Jan P. (March 1971). "Tiny 80-HP gas turbine to power compact car". Popular Science 198 (3): 34. https://books.google.com/books?id=ogAAAAAAMBAJ&q=Tiny+80-HP+gas+turbine+to+power+compact+car&pg=PA34. Retrieved 13 March 2016. 
  71. Ludvigsen, Karl (November 1971). "Williams Turbine Takes the Road". Motor Trend 23 (11). 
  72. Norbye, Jan P.; Dunne, Jim (September 1973). "Gas turbine car: it's now or never". Popular Science 302 (3): 59. https://books.google.com/books?id=scA6lVmzQA8C&pg=PA56. 
  73. Roy, Rex (2 January 2009). "Coal in Your Stocking? Fuel up the Cadillac!". The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/04/automobiles/04COAL.html. 
  74. "This Oldsmobile was powered by a coal-burning turbine engine". 16 January 2017. https://www.autoweek.com/car-life/but-wait-theres-more/a1812701/oldsmobile-was-powered-coal-burning-turbine-engine/. 
  75. "GM made a coal-powered car in the 80s". 20 March 2018. https://drivemag.com/news/gm-made-a-coal-powered-car-in-the-80s. 
  76. "Article in Green Car". Greencar.com. 31 October 2007. http://www.greencarreports.com/. 
  77. Nagy, Chris (1 October 2010). "The Electric Cat: Jaguar C-X75 Concept Supercar". Automoblog.net. http://www.automoblog.net/2010/10/01/the-electric-cat-jaguar-c-x75-concept-supercar/. 
  78. "Turbine Drives Retired Racing Car". Popular Science: 89. June 1955. https://books.google.com/books?id=biYDAAAAMBAJ&q=popular+science+1930&pg=PA89. Retrieved 23 July 2018. 
  79. "The history of the Howmet TX turbine car of 1968, still the world's only turbine powered race winner". Pete Stowe Motorsport History. June 2006. http://website.lineone.net/~pete.stowe/pete_howmet.htm. 
  80. Brophy, Jim (June 2, 2018). "Bus Stop Classics: General Motors (GM) Turbo Cruiser I, II and III Urban Transit Coaches – Maverick (Top Gun), Your Bus is Here...". https://www.curbsideclassic.com/bus-stop-classic/bus-stop-classics-general-motors-gm-turbo-cruiser-i-ii-and-iii-urban-transit-coaches-maverick-top-gun-your-bus-is-here/. 
  81. "Serial Hybrid Busses for a Public Transport scheme in Brescia (Italy)". Draft.fgm-amor.at. http://draft.fgm-amor.at/altermotive/study_sheet.phtml?study_id=2866&lang1=en. 
  82. Kay, Antony L. (2002). German jet engine and gas turbine development 1930 – 1945. Airlife. ISBN 9781840372946. 
  83. Fletcher, David (2017). "Gas Turbine Jagdtiger". tankmuseum.org. https://tankmuseum.org/article/gas-turbine-jagdtiger. 
  84. Ogorkiewicz, Richard M. (1991). Technology of Tanks. Jane's Information Group. p. 259. ISBN 9780710605955. https://archive.org/details/Janes_Technology_of_Tanks_01. 
  85. Walsh, Philip P.; Fletcher, Paul (2004). Gas Turbine Performance (2nd ed.). John Wiley and Sons. p. 25. ISBN 978-0-632-06434-2. 
  86. "The first marine gas turbine, 1947". Scienceandsociety.co.uk. 23 April 2008. http://www.scienceandsociety.co.uk/results.asp?image=10421693. 
  87. Søløven class torpedoboat, 1965
  88. Willemoes class torpedo/guided missile boat, 1974
  89. Fast missile boat
  90. "US Coast Guard Historian's website, USCGC Point Thatcher (WPB-82314)". http://www.uscg.mil/history/webcutters/Point_Thatcher.pdf. 
  91. "Operation of a Marine Gas Turbine Under Sea Conditions". Journal of the American Society for Naval Engineers 66 (2): 457–466. 2009. doi:10.1111/j.1559-3584.1954.tb03976.x. 
  92. Future Ship Powering Options: Exploring alternative methods of ship propulsion. Royal Academy of Engineering Prince Philip House. 2013. ISBN 9781909327016. http://www.raeng.org.uk/publications/reports/future-ship-powering-options. 
  93. Naval Education and Training Program Development Center Introduction to Marine Gas Turbines (1978) Naval Education and Training Support Command, pp. 3.
  94. National Research Council (U.S.) Innovation in the Maritime Industry (1979) Maritime Transportation Research Board, pp. 127–131
  95. "Jetfoil/hydrofoil Historical Snapshot". Boeing. http://www.boeing.com/history/products/jetfoil-hydrofoil.page. 
  96. "GE – Aviation: GE Goes from Installation to Optimized Reliability for Cruise Ship Gas Turbine Installations". Geae.com. 16 March 2004. http://www.geae.com/aboutgeae/presscenter/marine/marine_20040316.html. 
  97. "CFD for Aero Engines". HCL Technologies. April 2011. http://www.hcltech.com/sites/default/files/CFD_for_Aero_Engines.pdf. 
  98. Chrystie, R; Burns, I; Kaminski, C (2013). "Temperature Response of an Acoustically Forced Turbulent Lean Premixed Flame: A Quantitative Experimental Determination". Combustion Science and Technology 185: 180–199. doi:10.1080/00102202.2012.714020. 
  99. Çengel, Yunus A.; Boles., Michael A. (2011). 9-8. Thermodynamics: An Engineering Approach (7th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill. p. 510. 
  100. "MHI Achieves 1,600 °C Turbine Inlet Temperature in Test Operation of World's Highest Thermal Efficiency "J-Series" Gas Turbine". Mitsubishi Heavy Industries. 26 May 2011. http://www.mhi.co.jp/en/news/story/1105261435.html. 
  101. Brain, Marshall (1 April 2000). "How Gas Turbine Engines Work". Science.howstuffworks.com. http://science.howstuffworks.com/turbine2.htm. 

Further reading

External links