Biology:Rufous hummingbird

From HandWiki
Revision as of 10:38, 11 February 2024 by NBrushPhys (talk | contribs) (correction)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Short description: Species of bird

Rufous hummingbird
Rufous Hummingbird, male 01.jpg
Male in hovering flight
CITES Appendix II (CITES)[2]
Scientific classification edit
Domain: Eukaryota
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Aves
Clade: Strisores
Order: Apodiformes
Family: Trochilidae
Genus: Selasphorus
Species:
S. rufus
Binomial name
Selasphorus rufus
(Gmelin, JF, 1788)
Distribution.selasphorus.rufus.png
  Summer, breeding range
  Winter range

The rufous hummingbird (Selasphorus rufus) is a small hummingbird, about 8 cm (3.1 in) long with a long, straight and slender bill. These birds are known for their extraordinary flight skills, flying 2,000 mi (3,200 km) during their migratory transits. It is one of nine species in the genus Selasphorus.

Taxonomy

The rufous hummingbird was formally described in 1788 by the German naturalist Johann Friedrich Gmelin in his revised and expanded edition of Carl Linnaeus's Systema Naturae. He placed it with all the other hummingbirds in the genus Trochilus and coined the binomial name Trochilus rufus.[3] Gmelin based his description on the ruff-necked hummingbird described by John Latham in 1782 and the ruffed honeysucker described by Thomas Pennant in 1785.[4][5]

The type locality given by Gmelin was Nootka Sound on the west coast of Vancouver Island in western Canada, although breeding was estimated to occur in northwestern North America and wintering in westcentral Mexico.[6] The rufous hummingbird is now placed with eight other species in the genus Selasphorus that was introduced in 1832 by the English naturalist William John Swainson.[7][8] The genus name combines the Ancient Greek selas meaning "light" or "flame" with -phoros meaning "-carrying". The specific epithet rufus is the Latin word for "red".[9] The species is considered as monotypic: no subspecies are recognized.[8]

Description

Perched male

The adult male has a white breast, rufous face, flanks and tail and an iridescent orange-red throat patch or gorget. Some males have some green on their back and/or crown. The female has green, white, and some iridescent orange feathers in the center of the throat, and a dark tail with white tips and rufous base.

The female is slightly larger than the male. Females and the rare green-backed males are extremely difficult to differentiate from Allen's hummingbird. The typical "notched" shape of the second rectrix (R2) is considered an important field mark to distinguish the adult male rufous hummingbird from the adult male Allen's hummingbird.[10] This is a typical-sized hummingbird, being a very small bird. It weighs 2–5 g (0.071–0.176 oz), measures 7–9 cm (2.8–3.5 in) long and spans 11 cm (4.3 in) across the wings.[11]

Distribution and habitat

Perched female

Western rufous hummingbirds migrate through the Rocky Mountains and nearby lowlands from May to September to take advantage of the wildflower season. They may stay in one local region for the entire summer, in which case the migrants (like breeding birds) often aggressively take-over and defend feeding locations. Most individuals winter in wooded areas in the Mexican state of Guerrero, traveling over 2,000 mi (3,200 km) by an overland route from their nearest summer home – a prodigious journey for a bird weighing only 3 to 4 grams (0.11 to 0.14 oz).[12]

Adult male rufous hummingbirds tend to migrate slightly earlier than females or young.[13] Since juveniles and females are essentially indistinguishable from Allen's hummingbird, unless confirmed by close inspection, eastern rufous migrants may be classified as "rufous/Allen's hummingbirds".[11]

Behavior and ecology

Food and feeding

Hovering female at currant flowers

They feed on nectar from flowers using a long extendable tongue or catch insects on the wing. These birds require frequent feeding while active during the day and become torpid at night to conserve energy. Because of their small size, they are vulnerable to insect-eating birds and animals.

Hovering and sexual dimorphism

A study that used digital imaging velocimetry to look at wing movements found that the rufous hummingbird supports its body weight during hovering primarily by wing downstrokes (75% of lift) rather than by upstrokes (25% of lift).[14][15][16] When hovering during fasting, rufous hummingbirds oxidize fatty acids to support metabolism and food energy requirements, but can rapidly switch to carbohydrate metabolism (within 40 minutes) after feeding on flower nectar.[17][18]

A juvenile male nectaring on Rocky Mountain beeplant in Wyoming

Both males and females are territorial; however, they defend different types of territories.[19] The more aggressive males fight to defend areas with dense flowers, pushing females into areas with more sparsely populated flowers.[19] Males generally have shorter wings than females, therefore their metabolic cost for hovering is higher. This allows males to beat their wings at high frequencies, giving them the ability to chase and attack other birds to defend their territory.[19] The metabolic cost of short wings is compensated for by the fact that these males do not need to waste energy foraging for food, because their defended territory provides plenty of sustenance.[20] Females on the other hand are not given access to the high concentration food sources, because the males fight them off.[19] Therefore, females generally defend larger territories, where flowers are more sparsely populated, forcing them to fly farther between food sources.[19] The metabolic cost of flying farther is compensated for with longer wings providing more efficient flight for females.[19] The differences in wing length demonstrate a distinct sexual dimorphism, allowing each sex to best exploit resources in an area.

Breeding

Their primary breeding habitats are open areas, mountainsides and forest edges in western North America from southern Alaska through British Columbia and the Pacific Northwest to California ,[11] nesting further north (Alaska) than any other hummingbird. The female builds a nest in a protected location in a shrub or conifer. Males are promiscuous, mating with several females.[11]

Conservation status

In 2018, the rufous hummingbird was uplisted from least concern to near threatened on the IUCN Red List, on the basis that due to its reliance on insect prey during the wintering season, it will be heavily affected by the global decline in insect populations due to pesticides and intensified agriculture.[21] Due to climate change, many flowers that the rufous hummingbird feeds on during the breeding season have started blooming two weeks prior to the birds' arrival to their breeding locations, which may lead to rufous hummingbirds arriving too late to feed on them.[21]

Gallery

References

  1. BirdLife International (2020). "Selasphorus rufus". IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2020: e.T22688296A178595564. doi:10.2305/IUCN.UK.2020-3.RLTS.T22688296A178595564.en. https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/22688296/178595564. Retrieved 18 November 2021. 
  2. "Appendices | CITES". https://cites.org/eng/app/appendices.php. 
  3. Gmelin, Johann Friedrich (1788) (in Latin). Systema naturae per regna tria naturae : secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis. 1, Part 1 (13th ed.). Lipsiae [Leipzig]: Georg. Emanuel. Beer. p. 497. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/2897097. 
  4. Latham, John (1782). A General Synopsis of Birds. 1, Part 2. London: Printed for Benj. White. p. 785, Plate 35. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/33727441. 
  5. Pennant, Thomas (1785). Arctic Zoology. 2. London, United Kingdom: Printed by Henry Hughs. p. 290. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/32122058. 
  6. Peters, James Lee, ed (1945). Check-List of Birds of the World. 5. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. p. 141. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/14480152. 
  7. Swainson, William John; Richardson, J. (1831). Fauna boreali-americana, or, The zoology of the northern parts of British America. Part 2. The Birds. London: J. Murray. p. 324. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/41549739.  The title page bears the year 1831 but the volume did not appear until 1832.
  8. 8.0 8.1 Gill, Frank; Donsker, David; Rasmussen, Pamela, eds (January 2022). "Hummingbirds". IOC World Bird List Version 12.1. International Ornithologists' Union. http://www.worldbirdnames.org/bow/hummingbirds/. 
  9. Jobling, James A. (2010). The Helm Dictionary of Scientific Bird Names. London: Christopher Helm. pp. 352, 341. ISBN 978-1-4081-2501-4. 
  10. Pyle, Peter (1997). Identification Guide to North American Birds, Part I: Columbidae to Ploceidae. Steve N. G. Howell, Siobhan Ruck, Institute for Bird Populations, Point Reyes Bird Observatory. Bolinas, Calif.: Slate Creek Press. ISBN 0-9618940-2-4. OCLC 38593534. https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/38593534. 
  11. 11.0 11.1 11.2 11.3 "Rufous Hummingbird". All About Birds. Cornell Lab of Ornithology. http://www.allaboutbirds.org/guide/Rufous_Hummingbird/id. 
  12. "Rufous Hummingbird Migration: Temperature, Patterns and Timing". University of Wisconsin-Madison Arboretum. 2019. https://journeynorth.org/tm/humm/sl/17/article.html. 
  13. "Rufous Hummingbird" (in en). Audubon Guide to North American Birds. 2014-11-13. https://www.audubon.org/field-guide/bird/rufous-hummingbird. 
  14. "Master fliers of the bird kingdom". BBC. 27 June 2005. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/4124666.stm. 
  15. Shyy, W.; Aono, H.; Chimakurthi, S.K.; Trizila, P.; Kang, C.-K.; Cesnik, C.E.S.; Liu, H. (2010). "Recent progress in flapping wing aerodynamics and aeroelasticity". Progress in Aerospace Sciences (Elsevier BV) 46 (7): 284–327. doi:10.1016/j.paerosci.2010.01.001. ISSN 0376-0421. Bibcode2010PrAeS..46..284S. 
  16. "Aerodynamics of the hovering hummingbird". Nature 435 (7045): 1094–7. 2005. doi:10.1038/nature03647. PMID 15973407. Bibcode2005Natur.435.1094W. https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/bio_fac/37. 
  17. Lighton, John R. B. (2008). Measuring Metabolic Rates. Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195310610.001.0001. ISBN 978-0-19-531061-0. 
  18. "Oxidation rate and turnover of ingested sugar in hovering Anna's (Calypte anna) and rufous (Selasphorus rufus) hummingbirds". Journal of Experimental Biologists 210 (12): 2154–62. 2007. doi:10.1242/jeb.005363. PMID 17562889. 
  19. 19.0 19.1 19.2 19.3 19.4 19.5 Kodric-Brown, A.; Brown, J.H. (1978). "Influence of economics, interspecific competition, and sexual dimorphism on territoriality of migrant Rufous hummingbirds". Ecology 59 (2): 285–296. doi:10.2307/1936374. Bibcode1978Ecol...59..285K. 
  20. Feinsinger; Chaplin (1975). "On the relationship between wing disc loading and foraging strategy in hummingbirds". The American Naturalist 109 (966): 217–224. doi:10.1086/282988. 
  21. 21.0 21.1 BirdLife International (22 November 2018). "Red List update for birds" (in en-us). BirdLife. http://www.birdlife.org/sites/default/files/red_list_update_for_birds_-_two_iconic_species_saved_from_extinction_by_conservation_action.pdf. 

External links

Wikidata ☰ Q1190038 entry