Euler's theorem

Short description: Theorem on modular exponentiation

In number theory, Euler's theorem (also known as the Fermat–Euler theorem or Euler's totient theorem) states that, if n and a are coprime positive integers, then [math]\displaystyle{ a^{\varphi(n)} }[/math] is congruent to [math]\displaystyle{ 1 }[/math] modulo n, where [math]\displaystyle{ \varphi }[/math] denotes Euler's totient function; that is

[math]\displaystyle{ a^{\varphi (n)} \equiv 1 \pmod{n}. }[/math]

In 1736, Leonhard Euler published a proof of Fermat's little theorem (stated by Fermat without proof), which is the restriction of Euler's theorem to the case where n is a prime number. Subsequently, Euler presented other proofs of the theorem, culminating with his paper of 1763, in which he proved a generalization to the case where n is not prime.

The converse of Euler's theorem is also true: if the above congruence is true, then [math]\displaystyle{ a }[/math] and [math]\displaystyle{ n }[/math] must be coprime.

The theorem is further generalized by some Carmichael's theorems.

The theorem may be used to easily reduce large powers modulo [math]\displaystyle{ n }[/math]. For example, consider finding the ones place decimal digit of [math]\displaystyle{ 7^{222} }[/math], i.e. [math]\displaystyle{ 7^{222} \pmod{10} }[/math]. The integers 7 and 10 are coprime, and [math]\displaystyle{ \varphi(10) = 4 }[/math]. So Euler's theorem yields [math]\displaystyle{ 7^4 \equiv 1 \pmod{10} }[/math], and we get [math]\displaystyle{ 7^{222} \equiv 7^{4 \times 55 + 2} \equiv (7^4)^{55} \times 7^2 \equiv 1^{55} \times 7^2 \equiv 49 \equiv 9 \pmod{10} }[/math].

In general, when reducing a power of [math]\displaystyle{ a }[/math] modulo [math]\displaystyle{ n }[/math] (where [math]\displaystyle{ a }[/math] and [math]\displaystyle{ n }[/math] are coprime), one needs to work modulo [math]\displaystyle{ \varphi(n) }[/math] in the exponent of [math]\displaystyle{ a }[/math]:

if [math]\displaystyle{ x \equiv y \pmod{\varphi(n)} }[/math], then [math]\displaystyle{ a^x \equiv a^y \pmod{n} }[/math].

Euler's theorem underlies the RSA cryptosystem, which is widely used in Internet communications. In this cryptosystem, Euler's theorem is used with n being a product of two large prime numbers, and the security of the system is based on the difficulty of factoring such an integer.

Proofs

1. Euler's theorem can be proven using concepts from the theory of groups: The residue classes modulo n that are coprime to n form a group under multiplication (see the article Multiplicative group of integers modulo n for details). The order of that group is φ(n). Lagrange's theorem states that the order of any subgroup of a finite group divides the order of the entire group, in this case φ(n). If a is any number coprime to n then a is in one of these residue classes, and its powers a, a², ... , a^k modulo n form a subgroup of the group of residue classes, with a^k ≡ 1 (mod n). Lagrange's theorem says k must divide φ(n), i.e. there is an integer M such that kM = φ(n). This then implies,

[math]\displaystyle{ a^{\varphi(n)} = a^{kM} = (a^{k})^M \equiv 1^M =1 \pmod{n}. }[/math]

2. There is also a direct proof: Let R = {x₁, x₂, ... , x_φ(n)} be a reduced residue system (mod n) and let a be any integer coprime to n. The proof hinges on the fundamental fact that multiplication by a permutes the x_i: in other words if ax_j ≡ ax_k (mod n) then j = k. (This law of cancellation is proved in the article Multiplicative group of integers modulo n.) That is, the sets R and aR = {ax₁, ax₂, ... , ax_φ(n)}, considered as sets of congruence classes (mod n), are identical (as sets—they may be listed in different orders), so the product of all the numbers in R is congruent (mod n) to the product of all the numbers in aR:

[math]\displaystyle{ \prod_{i=1}^{\varphi(n)} x_i \equiv \prod_{i=1}^{\varphi(n)} ax_i = a^{\varphi(n)}\prod_{i=1}^{\varphi(n)} x_i \pmod{n}, }[/math] and using the cancellation law to cancel each x_i gives Euler's theorem:

[math]\displaystyle{ a^{\varphi(n)}\equiv 1 \pmod{n}. }[/math]

See also

• Carmichael function
• Euler's criterion
• Fermat's little theorem
• Wilson's theorem

References

The Disquisitiones Arithmeticae has been translated from Gauss's Ciceronian Latin into English and German. The German edition includes all of his papers on number theory: all the proofs of quadratic reciprocity, the determination of the sign of the Gauss sum, the investigations into biquadratic reciprocity, and unpublished notes.

• Gauss, Carl Friedrich; Clarke, Arthur A. (translated into English) (1986), Disquisitiones Arithemeticae (Second, corrected edition), New York: Springer, ISBN 0-387-96254-9 
• Gauss, Carl Friedrich; Maser, H. (translated into German) (1965), Untersuchungen uber hohere Arithmetik (Disquisitiones Arithemeticae & other papers on number theory) (Second edition), New York: Chelsea, ISBN 0-8284-0191-8 
• Hardy, G. H.; Wright, E. M. (1980), An Introduction to the Theory of Numbers (Fifth edition), Oxford: Oxford University Press, ISBN 978-0-19-853171-5, https://archive.org/details/introductiontoth00hard 
• Ireland, Kenneth; Rosen, Michael (1990), A Classical Introduction to Modern Number Theory (Second edition), New York: Springer, ISBN 0-387-97329-X 
• Landau, Edmund (1966), Elementary Number Theory, New York: Chelsea 

External links

• Weisstein, Eric W.. "Euler's Totient Theorem". http://mathworld.wolfram.com/EulersTotientTheorem.html. 
• Euler-Fermat Theorem at PlanetMath