View source for Astronomy:Impact event

{{Short description|Collision of two astronomical objects}}
[[File:Impact event.jpg|thumb|upright=1.1|A major impact event releases the energy of several million nuclear weapons detonating simultaneously when an asteroid of only a few kilometers in diameter collides with a larger body such as the Earth ''(image: artist's impression)''.]]

An '''impact event''' is a [[Physics:Collision|collision]] between [[Astronomy:Astronomical object|astronomical object]]s causing measurable effects.<ref name="Rumpf 3433–3440">{{Cite journal|last1=Rumpf|first1=Clemens M.| last2=Lewis |first2=Hugh G.|last3=Atkinson|first3=Peter M.|date=2017-04-19|title=Asteroid impact effects and their immediate hazards for human populations|journal=Geophysical Research Letters| language=en| volume=44|issue=8|pages=3433–3440|doi=10.1002/2017gl073191|issn=0094-8276| arxiv=1703.07592 |bibcode=2017GeoRL..44.3433R|s2cid=34867206}}</ref> Impact events have physical consequences and have been found to regularly occur in [[Astronomy:Planetary system|planetary system]]s, though the most frequent involve [[Astronomy:Asteroid|asteroid]]s, [[Astronomy:Comet|comet]]s or [[Astronomy:Meteoroid|meteoroid]]s and have minimal effect. When large objects impact [[Astronomy:Terrestrial planet|terrestrial planet]]s such as the [[Astronomy:Earth|Earth]], there can be significant physical and biospheric consequences, as the impacting body is usually traveling at several kilometres a second (a minimum of {{cvt|11.2|km/s|mi/s}} for an Earth impacting body<ref>{{Cite web |last1=Koeberl |first1=Christian |last2=Sharpton |first2=Virgil L. |title=Terrestrial Impact Craters, Second Edition |url=https://www.lpi.usra.edu/publications/slidesets/craters/ |publisher=[[Organization:Lunar and Planetary Institute|Lunar and Planetary Institute]] |access-date=2024-01-27}}</ref>), though atmospheres mitigate many surface impacts through [[Astronomy:Atmospheric entry|atmospheric entry]]. [[Astronomy:Impact crater|Impact crater]]s and structures are dominant landforms on many of the [[Astronomy:Solar System|Solar System]]'s solid objects and present the strongest empirical evidence for their frequency and scale.

Impact events appear to have played a significant role in the [[Astronomy:Formation and evolution of the Solar System|evolution of the Solar System]] since its formation. Major impact events have significantly shaped Earth's history, and have been implicated in the formation of the Earth–Moon system. Impact events also appear to have played a significant role in the [[Biology:Evolutionary history of life|evolutionary history of life]]. Impacts may have helped deliver the building blocks for life (the [[Biology:Panspermia|panspermia]] theory relies on this premise). Impacts have been suggested as the [[Earth:Origin of water on Earth|origin of water on Earth]]. They have also been implicated in several mass extinctions. The prehistoric [[Earth:Chicxulub crater#Impact specifics|Chicxulub impact]], 66 million years ago, is believed to not only be the cause of the [[Earth:Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction event|Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction event]]<ref name="autogenerated76">{{cite journal|last1=Becker|first1=Luann |title=Repeated Blows |journal=Scientific American |volume=286 |issue=3 |date=2002 |pages=76–83 |doi=10.1038/scientificamerican0302-76 |pmid=11857903| bibcode = 2002SciAm.286c..76B}}</ref> but acceleration of the [[Biology:Evolution of mammals|evolution of mammals]] leading to their dominance and in turn, setting in place conditions for the eventual rise of [[Biology:Human|human]]s.<ref name="Hughes Berv Chester Sargis pp. 14540–14554">{{cite journal | last1=Hughes | first1=Jonathan J. | last2=Berv | first2=Jacob S. | last3=Chester | first3=Stephen G. B. | last4=Sargis | first4=Eric J. | last5=Field | first5=Daniel J. | title=Ecological selectivity and the evolution of mammalian substrate preference across the K–Pg boundary | journal=Ecology and Evolution | publisher=Wiley | volume=11 | issue=21 | date=2021-10-11 | issn=2045-7758 | doi=10.1002/ece3.8114 | pages=14540–14554| pmid=34765124 | pmc=8571592 | bibcode=2021EcoEv..1114540H }}</ref>

Throughout recorded history, hundreds of Earth impacts (and exploding [[Astronomy:Bolide|bolide]]s) have been reported, with some occurrences causing deaths, injuries, property damage, or other significant localised consequences.<ref>{{Citation|last=Lewis|first=John S.|title=Rain of Iron and Ice|publisher=Helix Books (Addison-Wesley)|date=1996|page=[https://archive.org/details/rainofironicever00lewi/page/236 236]|isbn=978-0201489507|url=https://archive.org/details/rainofironicever00lewi/page/236}}</ref> One of the best-known recorded events in modern times was the [[Physics:Tunguska event|Tunguska event]], which occurred in Siberia, Russia, in 1908. The 2013 [[Physics:Chelyabinsk meteor|Chelyabinsk meteor]] event is the only known such incident in modern times to result in numerous injuries. Its meteor is the largest recorded object to have encountered the Earth since the Tunguska event. The [[Astronomy:Comet Shoemaker–Levy 9|Comet Shoemaker–Levy 9]] impact provided the first direct observation of an extraterrestrial collision of Solar System objects, when the comet broke apart and collided with Jupiter in July 1994. An extrasolar impact was observed in 2013, when a massive terrestrial planet impact was detected around the star ID8 in the star cluster [[Astronomy:NGC 2547|NGC 2547]] by NASA's [[Astronomy:Spitzer Space Telescope|Spitzer Space Telescope]] and confirmed by ground observations.<ref name="space.com">{{Cite web|url=https://www.space.com/26975-giant-impact-debris-disk-sunlike-star.html|title=Smash! Aftermath of Colossal Impact Spotted Around Sunlike Star|first=Mike|last=Wall|date=August 28, 2014|website=Space.com}}</ref> Impact events have been a plot and background element in science fiction.

In April 2018, the [[Organization:B612 Foundation|B612 Foundation]] reported: "It's 100 percent certain we'll be hit [by a devastating asteroid], but we're not 100 percent certain when."<ref name="INQ-20180428">{{cite news |last=Homer |first=Aaron |title=Earth Will Be Hit by an Asteroid with 100 Percent Certainty, Says Space-Watching Group B612 – The group of scientists and former astronauts is devoted to defending the planet from a space apocalypse. |url=https://www.inquisitr.com/4881237/earth-will-be-hit-by-an-asteroid-with-100-percent-certainty-says-space-watching-group-b612/ |date=28 April 2018 |work=Inquisitr |access-date=28 April 2018 |archive-date=24 January 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200124092654/https://www.inquisitr.com/4881237/earth-will-be-hit-by-an-asteroid-with-100-percent-certainty-says-space-watching-group-b612/ |url-status=dead }}</ref> Also in 2018, physicist [[Biography:Stephen Hawking|Stephen Hawking]] considered in his final book ''Brief Answers to the Big Questions'' that an asteroid collision was the biggest threat to the planet.<ref name="WP-20181015">{{cite news |last=Stanley-Becker |first=Isaac |title=Stephen Hawking feared race of 'superhumans' able to manipulate their own DNA |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2018/10/15/stephen-hawking-feared-race-of-superhumans-able-to-manipulate-their-own-dna/ |date=15 October 2018 |newspaper={{wipe|The Washington Post}} |access-date=26 November 2018}}</ref><ref name="QZ-20181014">{{cite web |last=Haldevang |first=Max de |title=Stephen Hawking left us bold predictions on AI, superhumans, and aliens |url=https://qz.com/1423685/stephen-hawking-says-superhumans-will-take-over-ai-is-a-threat-and-humans-will-conquer-space/ |date=14 October 2018 |work=Quartz |access-date=26 November 2018}}</ref><ref name="NYT-20180618">{{cite news |last=Bogdan |first=Dennis |title=Comment – Better Way To Avoid Devastating Asteroids Needed? |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/14/science/asteroids-nasa-nathan-myhrvold.html#permid=27500228:27506217 |date=18 June 2018 |work={{wipe|The New York Times}} |access-date=26 November 2018}}</ref> In June 2018, the US National Science and Technology Council warned that America is unprepared for an asteroid impact event, and has developed and released the "National Near-Earth Object Preparedness Strategy Action Plan" to better prepare.<ref name="WH-20180621">{{cite web |author=Staff |title=National Near-Earth Object Preparedness Strategy Action Plan |url=https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/National-Near-Earth-Object-Preparedness-Strategy-and-Action-Plan-23-pages-1MB.pdf |date=21 June 2018 |via=National Archives |publisher=whitehouse.gov |access-date=22 June 2018 }}</ref><ref name="GIZ-20180621">{{cite news |last=Mandelbaum |first=Ryan F. |title=America Isn't Ready to Handle a Catastrophic Asteroid Impact, New Report Warns |url=https://gizmodo.com/america-isnt-ready-to-handle-a-catastrophic-asteroid-im-1827014709 |date=21 June 2018 |work=Gizmodo |access-date=22 June 2018}}</ref><ref name="ICARUS-220180522">{{cite journal |last=Myhrvold |first=Nathan |title=An empirical examination of WISE/NEOWISE asteroid analysis and results |date=22 May 2018 |journal=Icarus |volume=314 |pages=64–97 |doi=10.1016/j.icarus.2018.05.004 |bibcode=2018Icar..314...64M|doi-access=free }}</ref><ref name="NYT-20180614">{{cite news |last=Chang |first=Kenneth |title=Asteroids and Adversaries: Challenging What NASA Knows About Space Rocks – Two years ago, NASA dismissed and mocked an amateur's criticisms of its asteroids database. Now Nathan Myhrvold is back, and his papers have passed peer review. |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/14/science/asteroids-nasa-nathan-myhrvold.html |date=14 June 2018 |work={{wipe|The New York Times}} |access-date=22 June 2018}}</ref><ref name="NYT-20180614c">{{cite news |last=Chang |first=Kenneth |title=Asteroids and Adversaries: Challenging What NASA Knows About Space Rocks – Relevant Comments |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/14/science/asteroids-nasa-nathan-myhrvold.html#permid=27500228:27506217 |date=14 June 2018 |work={{wipe|The New York Times}} |access-date=22 June 2018 }}</ref> According to expert testimony in the United States Congress in 2013, [[Organization:NASA|NASA]] would require at least five years of preparation before [[Astronomy:Asteroid impact avoidance|a mission to intercept an asteroid]] could be launched.<ref name="US-Congress-20130410" /> On 26 September 2022, the [[Astronomy:Double Asteroid Redirection Test|Double Asteroid Redirection Test]] demonstrated the deflection of an asteroid.  It was the first such experiment to be carried out by humankind and was considered to be highly successful. The orbital period of the target body was changed by 32 minutes. The criterion for success was a change of more than 73 seconds.

== Impacts and the Earth ==
Major impact events have significantly shaped Earth's history, having been implicated in the formation of the Earth–Moon system, the [[Biology:Evolutionary history of life|evolutionary history of life]], the [[Earth:Origin of water on Earth|origin of water on Earth]], and several mass extinctions. Impact structures are the result of impact events on solid objects and, as the dominant landforms on many of the System's solid objects, present the most solid evidence of prehistoric events. Notable impact events include the hypothesized [[Astronomy:Late Heavy Bombardment|Late Heavy Bombardment]], which would have occurred early in the history of the Earth–Moon system, and the confirmed Chicxulub impact 66 million years ago, believed to be the cause of the [[Earth:Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction event|Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction event]].

=== Frequency and risk ===
{{Main|Astronomy:Asteroid impact avoidance}}
{{wide image|SmallAsteroidImpacts-Frequency-Bolide-20141114.jpg|500px|align-cap=center|Frequency of small asteroids roughly 1 to 20 meters in diameter impacting Earth's atmosphere.}}
[[File:Bolide.jpg|thumb|A bolide undergoing atmospheric entry]]

Small objects frequently collide with Earth. There is an inverse relationship between the size of the object and the frequency of such events. The lunar cratering record shows that the frequency of impacts decreases as approximately the [[Cube (algebra)|cube]] of the resulting crater's diameter, which is on average proportional to the diameter of the impactor.<ref name=ArvidsonEtAl79>{{Citation|last1=Crater Analysis Techniques Working Group|title=Standard Techniques for Presentation and Analysis of Crater Size-Frequency Data|journal=Icarus|volume=37|issue=2|pages=467–474|date=1979| postscript=.|bibcode=1979Icar...37..467C | doi = 10.1016/0019-1035(79)90009-5|last2=Arvidson| first2=R. E. |last3=Boyce|first3=J. |last4=Chapman|first4=C. |last5=Cintala|first5=M. |last6=Fulchignoni |first6=M.|last7=Moore|first7=H.|last8=Neukum|first8=G.|last9=Schultz |first9=P. |last10=Soderblom |first10=L.|last11=Strom|first11=R. |last12=Woronow |first12=A. |last13=Young|first13=R.|hdl=2060/19780014063|s2cid=118171810 |hdl-access=free}}</ref> Asteroids with a {{convert|1|km|mi|abbr=on}} diameter strike Earth every 500,000 years on average.<ref name="Paine 2002">{{Cite journal|last1=Paine|first1=Michael|last2=Peiser|first2=Benny|date=2002|title=The Frequency and Consequences of Cosmic Impacts Since the Demise of the Dinosaurs|url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265496068|journal=Bioastronomy 2002: Life Among the Stars}}</ref><ref name="types">{{Citation |first=Nick |last=Bostrom |date=March 2002 |url=http://www.nickbostrom.com/existential/risks.html |title=Existential Risks: Analyzing Human Extinction Scenarios and Related Hazards |journal=Journal of Evolution and Technology |volume=9}}</ref> Large collisions – with {{convert|5|km|mi|0|abbr=on}} objects – happen approximately once every twenty million years.<ref name="Earth-impact" /> The last known impact of an object of {{convert|10|km|mi|0|abbr=on}} or more in diameter was at the Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction event 66 million years ago.<ref name="UCB2013" />

The energy released by an impactor depends on diameter, density, velocity, and angle.<ref name="Earth-impact" /> The diameter of most near-Earth asteroids that have not been studied by radar or infrared can generally only be estimated within about a factor of two, by basing it on the asteroid's brightness. The density is generally assumed, because the diameter and mass, from which density can be calculated, are also generally estimated. Due to Earth's escape velocity, the minimum impact velocity is 11 km/s with asteroid impacts averaging around 17&nbsp;km/s on the Earth.<ref name="Earth-impact" /> The most probable impact angle is 45 degrees.<ref name="Earth-impact" />

Impact conditions such as asteroid size and speed, but also density and impact angle determine the kinetic energy released in an impact event. The more energy is released, the more damage is likely to occur on the ground due to the environmental effects triggered by the impact. Such effects can be shock waves, heat radiation, the formation of craters with associated earthquakes, and tsunamis if bodies of water are hit. Human populations are vulnerable to these effects if they live within the affected zone.<ref name="Rumpf 3433–3440"/> Large seiche waves arising from earthquakes and large-scale deposit of debris can also occur within minutes of impact, thousands of kilometres from impact.<ref name=pnas1>[https://www.pnas.org/content/early/2019/03/27/1817407116 A seismically induced onshore surge deposit at the KPg boundary, North Dakota] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190404144219/https://www.pnas.org/content/early/2019/03/27/1817407116 |date=2019-04-04 }} – Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences – Robert DePalma ''et al.'', published 1 April 2019.<p>([https://www.pnas.org/content/pnas/early/2019/03/27/1817407116.full.pdf PDF direct link], [https://www.pnas.org/content/pnas/suppl/2019/03/27/1817407116.DCSupplemental/pnas.1817407116.sapp.pdf Supplementary published information])</p></ref>

==== Airbursts ====

{{Further|Astronomy:Meteor air burst}}

Stony asteroids with a diameter of {{convert|4|m|sp=us}} enter Earth's atmosphere about once a year.<ref name="Earth-impact" /> Asteroids with a diameter of 7 meters enter the atmosphere about every 5 years with as much [[Physics:Kinetic energy|kinetic energy]] as the atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima (approximately 16 kilotons of TNT), but the air burst is reduced to just 5 kilotons.<ref name="Earth-impact" /> These ordinarily explode in the [[Earth:Mesosphere|upper atmosphere]] and most or all of the solids are [[Physics:Evaporation|vaporized]].<ref>{{Citation|author = Clark R. Chapman & David Morrison|title = Impacts on the Earth by asteroids and comets: assessing the hazard|journal = Nature|volume =367|issue = 6458|pages=33–40|date=January 6, 1994|bibcode = 1994Natur.367...33C|doi = 10.1038/367033a0|last2 = Morrison|s2cid = 4305299|url = https://zenodo.org/record/1233151}}</ref> However, asteroids with a diameter of {{convert|20|m|abbr=on|lk=off}}, and which strike Earth approximately twice every century, produce more powerful airbursts. The 2013 Chelyabinsk meteor was estimated to be about 20 m in diameter with an airburst of around 500 kilotons, an explosion 30 times the Hiroshima bomb impact. Much larger objects may impact the solid earth and create a crater.

{| class="wikitable floatleft" style="text-align: center;"
|+Stony asteroid impacts that generate an airburst<ref name="Earth-impact" />
|-
! rowspan=2 | Impactor<br>diameter !! colspan=2 | [[Physics:Kinetic energy|Kinetic energy]] at !! rowspan=2 | Airburst<br>altitude !! rowspan=2 | Average<br>frequency<br>(years) !! rowspan=2 | Recorded fireballs<br>(CNEOS)<br>(1988-2018)
|-
! atmospheric<br>entry
! airburst
|-
| {{convert|4|m|abbr=on|lk=on}} || 3 [[Physics:TNT equivalent|kt]] || 0.75 kt || {{convert|42.5|km|ft||abbr=on|lk=on}} || 1.3 || 54
|-
| {{convert|7|m|abbr=on|lk=off}} || 16 kt || 5 kt || {{convert|36.3|km|ft||abbr=on|lk=off}} || 4.6 || 15
|-
| {{convert|10|m|abbr=on|lk=off}} || 47 kt || 19 kt || {{convert|31.9|km|ft||abbr=on|lk=off}} || 10 || 2
|-
| {{convert|15|m|abbr=on|lk=off}} || 159 kt || 82 kt || {{convert|26.4|km|ft||abbr=on|lk=off}} || 27 || '''1'''
|-
| {{convert|20|m|abbr=on|lk=off}} || 376 kt || 230 kt || {{convert|22.4|km|ft||abbr=on|lk=off}} || 60 || [[Physics:Chelyabinsk meteor|'''1''']]
|-
| {{convert|30|m|abbr=on|lk=off}} || 1.3 [[Physics:TNT equivalent|Mt]] || 930 kt || {{convert|16.5|km|ft||abbr=on|lk=off}} || 185 || 0
|-
| {{convert|50|m|abbr=on|lk=off}} || 5.9 Mt || 5.2 Mt || {{convert|8.7|km|ft||abbr=on|lk=off}} || 764 || 0
|-
| {{convert|70|m|abbr=on|lk=off}} || 16 Mt || 15.2 Mt || {{convert|3.6|km|ft||abbr=on|lk=off}} || 1,900 || 0
|-
| {{convert|85|m|abbr=on|lk=off}} || 29 Mt || 28 Mt || {{convert|0.58|km|ft||abbr=on|lk=off}} || 3,300 || 0
|-
! colspan=6 style="font-size: 0.9em; font-weight: normal; text-align: left; padding: 6px;"| Based on density of 2600&nbsp;kg/m<sup>3</sup>, speed of 17&nbsp;km/s, and an impact angle of 45°
|}

{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; float:left; margin-top:0;"
|+Stony asteroids that impact sedimentary rock and create a crater<ref name="Earth-impact" />
|-
! rowspan=2 | Impactor<br>diameter !! colspan=2 | [[Physics:Kinetic energy|Kinetic energy]] at !! rowspan=2 | [[Astronomy:Impact crater|Crater]]<br>diameter !! rowspan=2 | Frequency<br>(years)
|-
! [[Astronomy:Atmospheric entry|atmospheric<br>entry]]
! impact
|-
| {{convert|100|m|abbr=on|lk=on}} || 47 [[Physics:TNT equivalent|Mt]] || 3.4 Mt || {{convert|1.2|km|abbr=on|lk=on}} || 5,200
|-
| {{convert|130|m|abbr=on|lk=off}} || 103 Mt || 31.4 Mt || {{convert|2|km|abbr=on|lk=off}} || 11,000
|-
| {{convert|150|m|abbr=on|lk=off}} || 159 Mt || 71.5 Mt || {{convert|2.4|km|abbr=on|lk=off}} || 16,000
|-
| {{convert|200|m|abbr=on|lk=off}} || 376 Mt || 261 Mt || {{convert|3|km|abbr=on|lk=off}} || 36,000
|-
| {{convert|250|m|abbr=on|lk=off}} || 734 Mt || 598 Mt || {{convert|3.8|km|abbr=on|lk=off}} || 59,000
|-
| {{convert|300|m|abbr=on|lk=off}} || 1270 Mt || 1110 Mt || {{convert|4.6|km|abbr=on|lk=off}} || 73,000
|-
| {{convert|400|m|abbr=on|lk=off}} || 3010 Mt || 2800 Mt || {{convert|6|km|abbr=on|lk=off}} || 100,000
|-
| {{convert|700|m|abbr=on|lk=off}} || 16100 Mt || 15700 Mt || {{convert|10|km|abbr=on|lk=off}} || 190,000
|-
| {{convert|1000|m|abbr=on|lk=off}} || 47000 Mt || 46300 Mt || {{convert|13.6|km|abbr=on|lk=off}} || 440,000
|-
! colspan=5 style="font-size: 0.9em; font-weight: normal; text-align: left; padding: 6px;" | Based on [[Physics:Density|ρ]] = 2600&nbsp;kg/m<sup>3</sup>; [[Physics:Speed|v]] = 17&nbsp;km/s; and an angle of 45°
|}
{{clear|left}}

Objects with a diameter less than {{convert|1|m|ft|abbr=on}} are called meteoroids and seldom make it to the ground to become meteorites. An estimated 500 meteorites reach the surface each year, but only 5 or 6 of these typically create a [[Earth:Weather radar|weather radar]] signature with a strewn field large enough to be recovered and be made known to scientists.

The late Eugene Shoemaker of the U.S. Geological Survey estimated the rate of Earth impacts, concluding that an event about the size of the nuclear weapon that destroyed Hiroshima occurs about once a year.{{citation needed|date=December 2013}} Such events would seem to be spectacularly obvious, but they generally go unnoticed for a number of reasons: the majority of the Earth's surface is covered by water; a good portion of the land surface is uninhabited; and the explosions generally occur at relatively high altitude, resulting in a huge flash and thunderclap but no real damage.{{citation needed|date=December 2013}}

Although no human is known to have been killed directly by an impact{{Disputed inline|.22Although_no_human_is_known_to_have_been_killed_directly_by_an_impact.22_-_not_true|date=January 2017}}, over 1000 people were injured by the Chelyabinsk meteor airburst event over Russia in 2013.<ref>["Число пострадавших при падении метеорита приблизилось к 1500" (in Russian). РосБизнесКонсалтинг. Retrieved 25 February 2013.]</ref> In 2005 it was estimated that the chance of a single person born today dying due to an impact is around 1 in 200,000.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg18825221.900-the-word-torino-scale.html |title=The word: Torino scale |work=New Scientist |page=56 |date=25 October 2005}}</ref> The two to four-meter-sized asteroids {{mpl|2008 TC|3}}, {{mpl|2014 AA}}, [[Astronomy:2018 LA|2018 LA]], 2019 MO, [[Astronomy:2022 EB5|2022 EB5]], and the suspected artificial satellite [[Astronomy:WT1190F|WT1190F]] are the only known objects to be detected before impacting the Earth.<ref>[Roylance, Frank (2008-10-07). "Predicted meteor may have been sighted". MarylandWeather. Archived from the original on 10 October 2008. Retrieved 2008-10-08.]</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=The First Discovered Asteroid of 2014 Collides With The Earth – An Update |publisher=NASA/JPL |date=3 January 2014 |url=http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news182a.html |access-date=11 January 2014 |archive-date=11 February 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170211170917/http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news182a.html |url-status=dead }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/tools/sbdb_lookup.html#/?sstr=2022%20EB5&view=VOP |title=Small-Body Database Lookup |publisher=Ssd.jpl.nasa.gov |date= |accessdate=2022-03-16}}</ref>

=== Geological significance ===
Impacts have had, during the history of the Earth, a significant geological and climatic influence.<ref>French, B. M. (1998). Traces of catastrophe: A handbook of shock-metamorphic effects in terrestrial meteorite impact structures.</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Alvarez |first1=L.W. |last2=Alvarez |first2=W. |last3=Asaro |first3=F. |last4=Michel |first4=H. V. |year=1980 |title=Extraterrestrial cause for the Cretaceous–Tertiary extinction |journal=Science |volume=208 |issue=4448 |pages=1095–1108 |bibcode=1980Sci...208.1095A |doi=10.1126/science.208.4448.1095 |pmid=17783054|citeseerx=10.1.1.126.8496 |s2cid=16017767 }}</ref>

The [[Astronomy:Moon|Moon]]'s existence is widely attributed to a huge impact early in Earth's history.<ref name=nature412>{{cite journal|last1=Canup |first1=R. |last2=Asphaug |first2=E. |title=Origin of the Moon in a giant impact near the end of the Earth's formation |journal=Nature |volume=412 |pages=708–712 |date=2001 |doi=10.1038/35089010 |pmid=11507633 |issue=6848 |bibcode=2001Natur.412..708C |s2cid=4413525 |url=http://www.es.ucsc.edu/~rcoe/eart206/canup_Moon_Nature_01.pdf |access-date=2011-12-10 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100730135923/http://es.ucsc.edu/~rcoe/eart206/canup_Moon_Nature_01.pdf |archive-date=July 30, 2010 }}</ref> Impact events earlier in the [[Earth:History of Earth|history of Earth]] have been credited with creative as well as destructive events; it has been proposed that impacting comets delivered the Earth's water, and some have suggested that the origins of life may have been influenced by impacting objects by bringing organic chemicals or lifeforms to the Earth's surface, a theory known as [[Biology:Panspermia|exogenesis]].

[[File:Eugene Shoemaker.jpg|thumb|upright|Eugene Merle Shoemaker was first to prove that meteorite impacts have affected the Earth.]]

These modified views of Earth's history did not emerge until relatively recently, chiefly due to a lack of direct observations and the difficulty in recognizing the signs of an Earth impact because of erosion and weathering. Large-scale terrestrial impacts of the sort that produced the Barringer Crater, locally known as Meteor Crater, northeast of Flagstaff, Arizona, are rare. Instead, it was widely thought that cratering was the result of volcanism: the Barringer Crater, for example, was ascribed to a prehistoric volcanic explosion (not an unreasonable hypothesis, given that the volcanic [[Earth:San Francisco Peaks|San Francisco Peaks]] stand only {{convert|30|mi|km|order=flip|abbr=on|disp=or}} to the west). Similarly, the craters on the surface of the Moon were ascribed to volcanism.

It was not until 1903–1905 that the Barringer Crater was correctly identified as an impact crater, and it was not until as recently as 1963 that research by [[Biography:Eugene Merle Shoemaker|Eugene Merle Shoemaker]] conclusively proved this hypothesis. The findings of late 20th-century [[Astronomy:Space exploration|space exploration]] and the work of scientists such as Shoemaker demonstrated that impact cratering was by far the most widespread geological process at work on the Solar System's solid bodies. Every surveyed solid body in the Solar System was found to be cratered, and there was no reason to believe that the Earth had somehow escaped bombardment from space. In the last few decades of the 20th century, a large number of highly modified impact craters began to be identified. The first direct observation of a major impact event occurred in 1994: the collision of the comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 with [[Astronomy:Jupiter|Jupiter]].

Based on crater formation rates determined from the Earth's closest celestial partner, the Moon, astrogeologists have determined that during the last 600 million years, the Earth has been struck by 60 objects of a diameter of {{convert|5|km|mi|0|abbr=on}} or more.<ref name="Paine 2002" /> The smallest of these impactors would leave a crater almost {{convert|100|km|mi|-1|abbr=on}} across. Only three confirmed craters from that time period with that size or greater have been found: [[Earth:Chicxulub crater|Chicxulub]], [[Earth:Popigai impact structure|Popigai]], and [[Earth:Manicouagan Reservoir|Manicouagan]], and all three have been suspected of being linked to extinction events<ref>{{cite web|title=Russia's Popigai Meteor Crash Linked to Mass Extinction
 |website=Live Science
 |url=http://www.livescience.com/46312-popigai-crater-linked-eocene-mass-extinction.html
 |date=June 13, 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|first=J.P.|last=Hodych|author2=G.R.Dunning
 |title=Did the Manicouagan impact trigger end-of-Triassic mass extinction?
 |journal=Geology|volume=20|issue=1|date=1992|pages=51.54|doi=10.1130/0091-7613(1992)020<0051:DTMITE>2.3.CO;2|bibcode = 1992Geo....20...51H}}</ref> though only Chicxulub, the largest of the three, has been consistently considered. The impact that caused [[Earth:Mistastin crater|Mistastin crater]] generated temperatures exceeding 2,370&nbsp;°C, the highest known to have occurred on the surface of the Earth.<ref name="Gizmodo 2017-09-17">{{cite news |last=Dvorsky |first=George
 |url=https://www.gizmodo.com.au/2017/09/the-hottest-known-temperature-on-earth-was-caused-by-an-ancient-asteroid-strike/
 |title=The Hottest Known Temperature On Earth Was Caused By An Ancient Asteroid Strike
 |language=en |work=Gizmodo |date=2017-09-17 |access-date=2017-09-17}}</ref>

Besides the direct effect of asteroid impacts on a planet's surface topography, global climate and life, recent studies have shown that several consecutive impacts might have an effect on the dynamo mechanism at a planet's core responsible for maintaining the magnetic field of the planet, and may have contributed to Mars' lack of current magnetic field.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.wired.com/2011/01/mars-dynamo-death/|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20131230034219/http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2011/01/mars-dynamo-death/|url-status=dead|title=Multiple Asteroid Strikes May Have Killed Mars's Magnetic Field|first=Lisa|last=Grossman|archivedate=December 30, 2013|via=www.wired.com}}</ref> An impact event may cause a [[Earth:Mantle plume|mantle plume]] (volcanism) at the [[Antipodal point|antipodal point]] of the impact.<ref name="Hagstrum 2005">{{Cite journal|last1=Hagstrum|first1=Jonathan T.|date=2005|title=Antipodal Hotspots and Bipolar Catastrophes: Were Oceanic Large-body Impacts the Cause?|url=http://www.mantleplumes.org/WebDocuments/Antip_hot.pdf|journal=[[Earth:Earth and Planetary Science Letters|Earth and Planetary Science Letters]]|volume=236|issue=1–2|pages=13–27|bibcode=2005E&PSL.236...13H|doi=10.1016/j.epsl.2005.02.020}}</ref> The Chicxulub impact may have increased volcanism at [[Earth:Mid-ocean ridge|mid-ocean ridge]]s <ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Byrnes|first1=Joseph S.|last2=Karlstrom|first2=Leif|date=February 2018|title=Anomalous K-Pg–aged seafloor attributed to impact-induced mid-ocean ridge magmatism|journal=Science Advances|language=en|volume=4|issue=2|pages=eaao2994|doi=10.1126/sciadv.aao2994|issn=2375-2548|pmc=5810608|pmid=29441360|bibcode=2018SciA....4.2994B}}</ref> and has been proposed to have triggered flood basalt volcanism at the [[Earth:Deccan Traps|Deccan Traps]].<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Richards|first1=Mark A.|last2=Alvarez|first2=Walter|last3=Self|first3=Stephen|last4=Karlstrom|first4=Leif|last5=Renne|first5=Paul R.|last6=Manga|first6=Michael|last7=Sprain|first7=Courtney J.|last8=Smit|first8=Jan|last9=Vanderkluysen|first9=Loÿc|last10=Gibson|first10=Sally A.|date=2015-11-01|title=Triggering of the largest Deccan eruptions by the Chicxulub impact|url=https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/gsabulletin/article-abstract/127/11-12/1507/126064/Triggering-of-the-largest-Deccan-eruptions-by-the|journal=GSA Bulletin|language=en|volume=127|issue=11–12|pages=1507–1520|doi=10.1130/B31167.1|bibcode=2015GSAB..127.1507R|s2cid=3463018 |issn=0016-7606}}</ref>

While numerous impact craters have been confirmed on land or in the shallow seas over continental shelves, no impact craters in the deep ocean have been widely accepted by the scientific community.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Dypvik|first1=Henning|last2=Burchell|first2=Mark|last3=Claeys|first3=Philippe|title=Impacts into Marine and Icy Environments: A Short Review in ''Cratering in Marine Environments and on Ice''}}</ref> Impacts of projectiles as large as one&nbsp;km in diameter are generally thought to explode before reaching the sea floor, but it is unknown what would happen if a much larger impactor struck the deep ocean. The lack of a crater, however, does not mean that an ocean impact would not have dangerous implications for humanity. Some scholars have argued that an impact event in an [[Earth:Ocean|ocean]] or [[Earth:Sea|sea]] may create a [[Physics:Megatsunami|megatsunami]], which can cause destruction both at sea and on land along the coast,<ref name=GaultEtAl79>{{cite journal|last1=Gault|first1=D. E.|last2=Sonnet|first2=C. P.|last3=Wedekind|first3=J. A.|title=Tsunami Generation by Pelagic Planetoid Impact|journal=Lunar and Planetary Science Conference Abstract|date=1979}}</ref> but this is disputed.<ref name=Melosh03>{{cite journal|last=Melosh|first=H. J.|title=Impact-generated tsunamis: An over-rated hazard|journal=Lunar and Planetary Science Conference Abstract|volume=34|page=2013|date=2003|bibcode=2003LPI....34.2013M}}</ref> The [[Earth:Eltanin impact|Eltanin impact]] into the [[Earth:Pacific Ocean|Pacific Ocean]] 2.5 Mya is thought to involve an object about {{convert|1|to|4|km}} across but remains craterless.

=== Biospheric effects ===
The effect of impact events on the biosphere has been the subject of scientific debate. Several theories of impact-related mass extinction have been developed. In the past 500 million years there have been five generally accepted <!-- there is some scientific disagreement over the number, so I have inserted the qualifier of common or "general acceptance" --> major mass extinctions that on average extinguished half of all [[Biology:Species|species]].<ref name="Keller"/> One of the largest mass extinctions to have affected life on Earth was the Permian-Triassic, which ended the [[Earth:Permian|Permian]] period 250 million years ago and killed off 90 percent of all species;<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/extinction/|title=extinction|website=math.ucr.edu}}</ref> life on Earth took 30 million years to recover.<ref name="SahneyBenton2008RecoveryFromProfoundExtinction">{{Citation |url= |author1=Sahney, S. |author2=Benton, M.J. |date=2008 |title=Recovery from the most profound mass extinction of all time |pmid=18198148 |journal=Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences |pmc=2596898 |doi=10.1098/rspb.2007.1370 |volume=275 |issue=1636 |pages=759–765 }}</ref> The cause of the Permian-Triassic extinction is still a matter of debate; the age and origin of proposed impact craters, i.e. the [[Earth:Bedout|Bedout]] High structure, hypothesized to be associated with it are still controversial.<ref name="Muller2005">{{cite journal | last1 = Müller | first1 = R.D. | last2 = Goncharov | first2 = A. | last3 = Kristi | first3 = A. | year = 2005 | title = Geophysical evaluation of the enigmatic Bedout basement high, offshore northwest Australia | journal = Earth and Planetary Science Letters | volume = 237 | issue = 1–2| pages = 265–284 | doi=10.1016/j.epsl.2005.06.014 | bibcode=2005E&PSL.237..264M}}</ref> The last such mass extinction led to the demise of the non-avian [[Biology:Dinosaur|dinosaur]]s and coincided with a large [[Astronomy:Meteorite|meteorite]] impact; this is the Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction event (also known as the K–T or K–Pg extinction event), which occurred 66 million years ago. There is no definitive evidence of impacts leading to the three other major mass extinctions.

In 1980, physicist [[Biography:Luis Walter Alvarez|Luis Alvarez]]; his son, geologist Walter Alvarez; and nuclear chemists Frank Asaro and Helen V. Michael from the [[Organization:University of California, Berkeley|University of California, Berkeley]] discovered unusually high concentrations of [[Chemistry:Iridium|iridium]] in a specific layer of rock [[Earth:Stratum|strata]] in the Earth's crust. Iridium is an element that is rare on Earth but relatively abundant in many meteorites. From the amount and distribution of iridium present in the 65-million-year-old "iridium layer", the Alvarez team later estimated that an asteroid of {{convert|10|to|14|km|mi|0|abbr=on}} must have collided with Earth. This iridium layer at the [[Earth:Cretaceous–Paleogene boundary|Cretaceous–Paleogene boundary]] has been found worldwide at 100 different sites. Multidirectionally [[Chemistry:Shocked quartz|shocked quartz]] (coesite), which is normally associated with large impact events<ref name=Fulgurite>{{cite journal|last1=Carter|first1=Elizabeth|last2=Pasek|first2=Matthew|last3=Smith|first3=Tim|last4=Kee|first4=Terence|last5=Hines|first5=Peter|last6=Howell|first6=G. M. Edwards|title=Rapid Raman mapping of a fulgurite (Paywall)|journal=Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry|date=August 2010|volume=397|issue=7|pages=2647–2658|doi=10.1007/s00216-010-3593-z|pmid=20229006|s2cid=23476732}}</ref> or atomic bomb explosions, has also been found in the same layer at more than 30 sites. [[Earth:Soot|Soot]] and ash at levels tens of thousands times normal levels were found with the above.

Anomalies in chromium isotopic ratios found within the K-T boundary layer strongly support the impact theory.<ref name="Shukolyukov1998">{{Citation | last1 = Shukolyukov | first1 = A. | last2 = Lugmair | first2 = G. W. | date = 1998 | title = Isotopic Evidence for the Cretaceous-Tertiary Impactor and Its Type | journal = Science | volume = 282 | issue = 5390| pages = 927–930 | doi = 10.1126/science.282.5390.927 | postscript = . | pmid=9794759 | bibcode=1998Sci...282..927S}}</ref> Chromium isotopic ratios are homogeneous within the earth, and therefore these isotopic anomalies exclude a volcanic origin, which has also been proposed as a cause for the iridium enrichment. Further, the chromium isotopic ratios measured in the K-T boundary are similar to the chromium isotopic ratios found in carbonaceous chondrites. Thus a probable candidate for the impactor is a carbonaceous asteroid, but a comet is also possible because comets are assumed to consist of material similar to carbonaceous chondrites.

Probably the most convincing evidence for a worldwide catastrophe was the discovery of the crater which has since been named Chicxulub Crater. This crater is centered on the Yucatán Peninsula of Mexico and was discovered by Tony Camargo and Glen Penfield while working as geophysicists for the Mexican oil company PEMEX.<ref>{{cite web|last=Penfield|first=December 2019 Glen|date=2019-12-01|title=Unlikely Impact|url=https://explorer.aapg.org/story/articleid/55293/unlikely-impact|access-date=2020-08-17|website=AAPG Explorer|language=en-US}}</ref> What they reported as a circular feature later turned out to be a crater estimated to be {{convert|180|km|mi|-1|abbr=on}} in diameter. This convinced the vast majority of scientists that this extinction resulted from a point event that is most probably an extraterrestrial impact and not from increased volcanism and climate change (which would spread its main effect over a much longer time period).

Although there is now general agreement that there was a huge impact at the end of the Cretaceous that led to the iridium enrichment of the K-T boundary layer, remnants have been found of other, smaller impacts, some nearing half the size of the Chicxulub crater, which did not result in any mass extinctions, and there is no clear linkage between an impact and any other incident of mass extinction.<ref name="Keller">{{cite journal | url=http://instruct.uwo.ca/earth-sci/083f/kellerkt.pdf | title=Impacts, volcanism and mass extinction: random coincidence or cause and effect? | author=Keller G. | journal=Australian Journal of Earth Sciences | date=2005 | volume=52 | issue=4–5 | pages=725–757 | doi=10.1080/08120090500170393|bibcode = 2005AuJES..52..725K | s2cid=39063747 }}</ref>

Paleontologists David M. Raup and Jack Sepkoski have proposed that an excess of extinction events occurs roughly every 26 million years (though many are relatively minor). This led physicist [[Biography:Richard A. Muller|Richard A. Muller]] to suggest that these extinctions could be due to a hypothetical companion star to the Sun called [[Astronomy:Nemesis (hypothetical star)|Nemesis]] periodically disrupting the orbits of comets in the [[Astronomy:Oort cloud|Oort cloud]], leading to a large increase in the number of comets reaching the inner Solar System where they might hit Earth. Physicist [[Biography:Adrian Melott|Adrian Melott]] and paleontologist Richard Bambach have more recently verified the Raup and Sepkoski finding, but argue that it is not consistent with the characteristics expected of a Nemesis-style periodicity.<ref>{{Citation|author = Adrian L. Melott & Richard K. Bambach|title = Nemesis Reconsidered|date=2010|journal = Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Letters|volume =407|issue = 1|pages=L99–L102|arxiv = 1007.0437 |bibcode = 2010MNRAS.407L..99M |doi = 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2010.00913.x |last2 = Bambach|s2cid = 7911150}}</ref>

=== Sociological and cultural effects ===

An impact event is commonly seen as a scenario that would bring about the end of civilization. In 2000, ''Discover'' magazine published a list of 20 possible sudden doomsday scenarios with an impact event listed as the most likely to occur.<ref>[http://discovermagazine.com/2000/oct/featworld "Twenty ways the world could end suddenly"]. ''Discover''.</ref>

A joint Pew Research Center/''Smithsonian'' survey from April 21 to 26, 2010 found that 31 percent of Americans believed that an asteroid will collide with Earth by 2050. A majority (61 percent) disagreed.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://people-press.org/reports/pdf/625.pdf|title=Public sees a future full of promise and peril|access-date=2014-07-11|archive-date=2011-02-04|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110204080409/http://people-press.org/reports/pdf/625.pdf|url-status=bot: unknown}}</ref>

===Earth impacts===
[[File:Artist's concept of collision at HD 172555.jpg|thumb|Artist's depiction of a collision between two planetary bodies. Such an impact between the Earth and a Mars-sized object likely formed the Moon.]]
In the early history of the Earth (about four billion years ago), bolide impacts were almost certainly common since the Solar System contained far more discrete bodies than at present. Such impacts could have included strikes by asteroids hundreds of kilometers in diameter, with explosions so powerful that they vaporized all the Earth's oceans. It was not until this heavy bombardment slackened that life appears to have begun to evolve on Earth.

====Precambrian====
The leading theory of the Moon's origin is the giant impact theory, which postulates that Earth was once hit by a [[Astronomy:Minor planet|planetoid]] the size of Mars; such a theory is able to explain the size and composition of the Moon, something not done by other theories of lunar formation.<ref>{{cite journal | title = Dynamics of Lunar Formation | author = Canup, Robin M. | journal = Annual Review of Astronomy & Astrophysics | volume = 42 | issue = 1 | pages = 441–475 | doi=10.1146/annurev.astro.41.082201.113457|bibcode = 2004ARA&A..42..441C | year = 2004 }}</ref>

According to the theory of the [[Astronomy:Late Heavy Bombardment|Late Heavy Bombardment]], there should have been 22,000 or more impact craters with diameters >20&nbsp;km (12&nbsp;mi), about 40 impact basins with diameters about 1,000&nbsp;km (620&nbsp;mi), and several impact basins with diameters about 5,000&nbsp;km (3,100&nbsp;mi). However, hundreds of millions of years of deformation at the Earth's crust pose significant challenges to conclusively identifying impacts from this period. Only two pieces of pristine lithosphere are believed to remain from this era: Kaapvaal Craton (in contemporary South Africa) and [[Earth:Pilbara Craton|Pilbara Craton]] (in contemporary Western Australia) to search within which may potentially reveal evidence in the form of physical craters. Other methods may be used to identify impacts from this period, for example, indirect gravitational or magnetic analysis of the mantle, but may prove inconclusive.

In 2021, evidence for a probable impact 3.46 billion-years ago at Pilbara Craton has been found in the form of a {{convert|150|km|mi}} crater created by the impact of a {{convert|10|km|mi}} asteroid (named "The Apex Asteroid") into the sea at a depth of {{convert|2.5|km|mi}} (near the site of [[Earth:Marble Bar, Western Australia|Marble Bar, Western Australia]]).<ref name="Ohmoto Graham Liu Tsukamoto p. ">{{citation | last1=Ohmoto | first1=Hiroshi | last2=Graham | first2=Uschi | last3=Liu | first3=Zi-Kui | last4=Tsukamoto | first4=Yuya | last5=Watanabe | first5=Yumiko | last6=Hamasaki | first6=Hiroshi | last7=Chorney | first7=Andrew | title=Discovery of a 3.46 billion-year-old impact crater in Western Australia | journal=Ess Open Archive ePrints | publisher=Wiley | date=2021-01-16 | volume=105 | doi=10.1002/essoar.10505838.1 | page=| bibcode=2021esoar.10505838O | s2cid=234265636 }}</ref> The event caused global tsunamis. It is also coincidental to some of the earliest evidence of life on Earth, fossilized [[Earth:Stromatolite|Stromatolite]]s.

Evidence of a massive impact, (named S2; "S" for Spherule),<ref name="WP-20231219">{{cite news |last=Achenbach |first=Joel |title=Giant space rock made Earth’s ocean boil but also helped early life |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/science/2023/12/19/early-earth-life-impacts-ocean/ |date=19 December 2023 |work={{wipe|The Washington Post}} |url-status=live |archiveurl=https://archive.today/20231219172301/https://www.washingtonpost.com/science/2023/12/19/early-earth-life-impacts-ocean/ |archivedate=19 December 2023 |accessdate=19 December 2023 }}</ref> in South Africa near a geological formation known as the Barberton Greenstone Belt was uncovered by scientists in 2014. They estimated the impact occurred at Kaapvaal Craton (South Africa) about 3.26 billion years ago and that the impactor was approximately {{convert|37|-|58|km|abbr=off|sp=us}} wide. The crater from this event, if it still exists, has not yet been found.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://news.agu.org/press-release/scientists-reconstruct-ancient-impact-that-dwarfs-dinosaur-extinction-blast/|title=Scientists reconstruct ancient impact that dwarfs dinosaur-extinction blast|website=AGU Newsroom}}</ref>

The [[Earth:Maniitsoq structure|Maniitsoq structure]], dated to around 3 billion years old (3 Ga), was once thought to be the result of an impact;<ref name="garde 2012">{{cite journal |last1=Garde |first1=Adam A. |last2=McDonald |first2=Iain |last3=Dyck |first3=Brendan |last4=Keulen |first4=Nynke |title=Searching for giant, ancient impact structures on Earth: The Mesoarchaean Maniitsoq structure, West Greenland |journal=Earth and Planetary Science Letters |date=July 2012 |volume=337–338 |pages=197–210 |doi=10.1016/j.epsl.2012.04.026|bibcode=2012E&PSL.337..197G }}</ref><ref name=":1">{{Cite journal|last=Wolf U. Reimold, Roger L. Gibson, Christian Koeberl|date=2013|title=Comment on "Searching for giant, ancient impact structures on Earth: The Mesoarchaean Maniitsoq structure, West Greenland" by Garde et al.|url=https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2013.04.014|journal=Earth and Planetary Science Letters|volume=369–370|pages=333–335|doi=10.1016/j.epsl.2013.04.014|via=Elsevier Science Direct}}</ref> however, follow-up studies have not confirmed its nature as an impact structure.<ref name=":1" /><ref name=":2">{{Cite journal|last=Wolf U. Reimold, Ludovic Ferrière, Alex Deutsch, Christian Koeberl|date=2014|title=Impact controversies: Impact recognition criteria and related issues|journal=Meteoritics and Planetary Science|volume=49|issue=5|pages=723–731|doi=10.1111/maps.12284|bibcode=2014M&PS...49..723R|s2cid=128625029|doi-access=free}}</ref><ref name=":3">{{Cite journal|last=C. L. Kirkland, C. Yakymchuk, J. Hollis, H. Heide-Jørgensen, M. Danišík|date=2018|title=Mesoarchean exhumation of the Akia terrane and a common Neoarchean tectonothermal history for West Greenland|journal=Precambrian Research|volume=314|pages=129–144|doi=10.1016/j.precamres.2018.06.004|bibcode=2018PreR..314..129K|s2cid=135213870|doi-access=free}}</ref><ref name=":5">{{Cite journal|last=N. J. Gardiner, C. L. Kirkland, J. Hollis, K. Szilas, A. Steenfelt, C. Yakymchuk, H. Heide-Jørgensen|date=2019|title=Building Mesoarchaean crust upon Eoarchaean roots: the Akia Terrane, West Greenland|journal=Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology|volume=174|issue=3|page=20|doi=10.1007/s00410-019-1554-x|bibcode=2019CoMP..174...20G|s2cid=134027320|doi-access=free|hdl=10023/18486|hdl-access=free}}</ref><ref name=":6">{{Cite journal|last=C. Yakymchuk, C. L. Kirkland, J. A. Hollis, J. Kendrick, N. J. Gardiner, K. Szilas|date=2020|title=Mesoarchean partial melting of mafic crust and tonalite production during high-T–low-P stagnant tectonism, Akia Terrane, West Greenland|journal=Precambrian Research|volume=339|page=105615|doi=10.1016/j.precamres.2020.105615|bibcode=2020PreR..33905615Y|s2cid=213973363|doi-access=free|hdl=10023/19439|hdl-access=free}}</ref><ref name=":4">{{Cite journal|last=Pedro Waterton, William R. Hyde, Jonas Tusch, Julie A. Hollis, Christopher L. Kirkland, Carson Kinney, Chris Yakymchuk, Nicholas J. Gardiner, David Zakharov, Hugo K. H. Olierook, Peter C. Lightfoot, Kristoffer Szilas|date=2020|title=Geodynamic Implications of Synchronous Norite and TTG Formation in the 3 Ga Maniitsoq Norite Belt, West Greenland|journal=Frontiers in Earth Science|volume=8|page=562062|doi=10.3389/feart.2020.562062|bibcode=2020FrEaS...8..406W|doi-access=free|hdl=10023/20744|hdl-access=free}}</ref> The Maniitsoq structure is not recognised as an impact structure by the [[Earth Impact Database]].<ref name=":9">{{cite web|title=Earth Impact Database|url=http://www.passc.net/EarthImpactDatabase/New%20website_05-2018/Index.html|access-date=2020-09-30|website=www.passc.net}}</ref>

In 2020, scientists discovered the world's oldest confirmed impact crater, the Yarrabubba crater, caused by an impact that occurred in [[Earth:Yilgarn Craton|Yilgarn Craton]] (what is now Western Australia), dated at more than 2.2 billion years ago with the impactor estimated to be around {{convert|7|km|mi}} wide.<ref name="NYT-20200121">{{cite news |last=Kornel |first=Katherine |title=Earth's Oldest Asteroid Impact Found in Australia – The cataclysm, which occurred roughly 2.2 billion years ago, might have catapulted the planet out of an ice age. |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/21/science/oldest-asteroid-impact-australia.html |date=21 January 2020 |work={{wipe|The New York Times}} |access-date=22 January 2020 }}</ref><ref name="NC-20200121">{{cite journal |author=Erikson, Timmons M. |display-authors=et al. |title=Precise radiometric age establishes Yarrabubba, Western Australia, as Earth's oldest recognised meteorite impact structure |date=21 January 2020 |journal=Nature Communications |volume=11 |issue=300 |page=300 |doi=10.1038/s41467-019-13985-7 |pmid=31964860 |pmc=6974607 |bibcode=2020NatCo..11..300E }}</ref><ref name=erickson>{{cite journal |author1=Erickson, T.M.|author2= Kirkland, C.L.|author3= Timms, N.E.|author4= Cavosie, A.J.|author5= Davison, T.M. |title=Precise radiometric age establishes Yarrabubba, Western Australia, as Earth's oldest recognised meteorite impact structure |journal=Nature Communications |date=21 Jan 2020 |volume=11 |issue=300 |page= 300|doi=10.1038/s41467-019-13985-7|pmid= 31964860|pmc= 6974607|bibcode=2020NatCo..11..300E }}</ref> It is believed that, at this time, the Earth was mostly or completely frozen, commonly called the [[Earth:Huronian glaciation|Huronian glaciation]].

The [[Earth:Vredefort impact structure|Vredefort impact event]], which occurred around 2 billion years ago in Kaapvaal Craton (what is now {{wipe|South Africa}}), caused the largest verified crater, a multi-ringed structure {{convert|160|-|300|km|mi|abbr=on|sigfig=1}} across, forming from an impactor approximately {{convert|10|–|15|km|abbr=on}} in diameter.<ref name="DB">{{Cite Earth Impact DB | name = Vredefort | access-date = 2008-12-30}}</ref><ref name="current record">{{cite web| title = Deep Impact – The Vredefort Dome| url=http://www.hartrao.ac.za/other/vredefort/vredefort.html| publisher= [[Astronomy:Hartebeesthoek Radio Astronomy Observatory|Hartebeesthoek Radio Astronomy Observatory]]| access-date = 2007-09-19| date = 2006-08-01}}</ref>

The [[Earth:Sudbury Basin|Sudbury impact event]] occurred on the [[Earth:Columbia (supercontinent)|Nuna supercontinent]] (now {{wipe|Canada}}) from a bolide approximately {{convert|10|-|15|km|mi|abbr=on}} in diameter approximately 1.849 billion years ago<ref name=Davis>{{cite journal|last=Davis| first= Donald W. | date= January 23, 2008| title= Sub-million-year age resolution of Precambrian igneous events by thermal extraction-thermal ionization mass spectrometer Pb dating of zircon: Application to crystallization of the Sudbury impact melt sheet| journal= Geology|  volume = 36| number = 5| pages= 383–386 |doi= 10.1130/G24502A.1| bibcode= 2008Geo....36..383D}}</ref> Debris from the event would have been scattered across the globe.

====Paleozoic and Mesozoic====
Two 10-kilometre sized asteroids are now believed to have struck Australia between 360 and 300 million years ago at the Western Warburton and [[Earth:East Warburton Basin|East Warburton Basin]]s, creating a 400-kilometre impact zone. According to evidence found in 2015, it is the largest ever recorded.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.australiangeographic.com.au/news/2015/03/worlds-largest-asteroid-impact-found-in-australia/|title=World's largest asteroid impact found in Australia|date=March 24, 2015|website=Australian Geographic}}</ref> A [[Earth:Diamantina River ring feature|third, possible impact]] was also identified in 2015 to the north, on the upper Diamantina River, also believed to have been caused by an asteroid 10&nbsp;km across about 300 million years ago, but further studies are needed to establish that this crustal anomaly was indeed the result of an impact event.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ga.gov.au/news-events/news/latest-news/potential-asteroid-impact-identified-in-western-queensland|title=Potential asteroid impact identified in western Queensland|publisher=Geoscience Australia|access-date=26 June 2016|date=2015-03-17}}</ref>

[[File:Chicxulub-animation.gif|thumb|An animation modelling the impact, and subsequent crater formation of the Chicxulub impact (University of Arizona, Space Imagery Center)]]
The prehistoric [[Earth:Chicxulub crater#Impact specifics|Chicxulub impact]], 66 million years ago, believed to be the cause of the Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction event, was caused by an asteroid estimated to be about {{convert|10|km|mi}} wide.<ref name="autogenerated76"/>

==== Paleogene ====
[[File:Hiawatha v45 scene1 4k 5mtopo.1760.tif|thumb|The Hiawatha impact crater in Greenland is buried under more than a kilometre of ice]]
Analysis of the Hiawatha Glacier reveals the presence of a 31&nbsp;km wide impact crater dated at 58 million years of age, less than 10 million years after the Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction event, scientists believe that the impactor was a metallic asteroid with a diameter in the order of 1.5 kilometres (0.9&nbsp;mi). The impact would have had global effects.<ref name="InitialStudy">{{cite journal|first=Kurt H. |last=Kjær |display-authors=et al |doi=10.1126/sciadv.aar8173|pmid=30443592 |pmc=6235527 |title=A large impact crater beneath Hiawatha Glacier in northwest Greenland|journal=Science Advances |volume=4 |issue=11 |pages=eaar8173 |date=November 2018 |bibcode=2018SciA....4.8173K }}</ref>

==== Pleistocene ====
{{Further|Earth:Pleistocene}}
[[File:Barringer Crater aerial photo by USGS.jpg|thumb|Aerial view of Barringer Crater in Arizona]]

Artifacts recovered with tektites from the 803,000-year-old [[Astronomy:Australasian strewnfield|Australasian strewnfield]] event in Asia link a ''[[Biology:Homo erectus|Homo erectus]]'' population to a significant meteorite impact and its aftermath.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://humanorigins.si.edu/evidence/behavior/stone-tools/early-stone-age-tools/handaxe-and-tektites-bose-china|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20141008080600/https://humanorigins.si.edu/evidence/behavior/handaxe-and-tektites-bose-china|url-status=dead|title=Handaxe and Tektites from Bose, China|archivedate=October 8, 2014|website=The Smithsonian Institution's Human Origins Program}}</ref><ref>{{cite news| url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/664967.stm | work=BBC News | title=Asia's oldest axe tools discovered | date=March 3, 2000}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal | doi=10.1146/annurev.anthro.33.070203.144024|title = Early Dispersals of Homo from Africa| journal=Annual Review of Anthropology| volume=33| pages=271–296|year = 2004|last1 = Antón|first1 = Susan C.| last2=Swisher, Iii| first2=Carl C.}}</ref> Significant examples of Pleistocene impacts include the Lonar crater lake in India, approximately 52,000 years old (though a study published in 2010 gives a much greater age), which now has a flourishing semi-tropical jungle around it.{{citation needed|date=February 2015}}
<!--The Younger Dryas impact hypothesis seems to be dead (2015) And, Younger Dryas is in Holocene, aka Modern Era --->

==== Holocene ====
{{Further|Earth:Holocene}}
The Rio Cuarto craters in Argentina were produced approximately 10,000 years ago, at the beginning of the Holocene. If proved to be impact craters, they would be the first impact of the Holocene.

The Campo del Cielo ("Field of Heaven") refers to an area bordering Argentina's Chaco Province where a group of iron meteorites were found, estimated as dating to 4,000–5,000 years ago. It first came to attention of Spanish authorities in 1576; in 2015, police arrested four alleged smugglers trying to steal more than a ton of protected meteorites.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://news.yahoo.com/four-arrested-argentina-smuggling-more-ton-meteorites-210404348.html|title=Four arrested in Argentina smuggling more than ton of meteorites|website=news.yahoo.com}}</ref> The Henbury craters in Australia (~5,000 years old) and [[Earth:Kaali crater|Kaali crater]]s in Estonia (~2,700 years old) were apparently produced by objects that broke up before impact.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://nt.gov.au/leisure/parks-reserves/find-a-park-to-visit/henbury-meteorites-conservation-reserve | title=Henbury Meteorites Conservation Reserve| date=2018-12-17}}</ref>{{citation needed|date=June 2018}}

Whitecourt crater in Alberta, Canada is estimated to be between 1,080 and 1,130 years old. The crater is approximately 36&nbsp;m (118&nbsp;ft) in diameter and 9&nbsp;m (30&nbsp;ft) deep, is heavily forested and was discovered in 2007 when a metal detector revealed fragments of meteoric iron scattered around the area.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.passc.net/EarthImpactDatabase/whitecourt.html |title=Whitecourt |access-date=2017-07-28 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170718105534/http://www.passc.net/EarthImpactDatabase/whitecourt.html |archive-date=2017-07-18 |url-status=dead }}</ref><ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.whitecourtstar.com/2012/07/03/whitecourt-crater-attracts-visitors | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160305210537/http://www.whitecourtstar.com/2012/07/03/whitecourt-crater-attracts-visitors | url-status=dead | archive-date=2016-03-05 | title=Whitecourt Star }}</ref>

A Chinese record states that 10,000 people were killed in the 1490 Qingyang event with the deaths caused by a hail of "falling stones"; some astronomers hypothesize that this may describe an actual meteorite fall, although they find the number of deaths implausible.<ref>{{Citation | last1 = Yau | first1 = K. | last2 = Weissman | first2 = P. | last3 = Yeomans | first3 = D. | title = Meteorite Falls in China and Some Related Human Casualty Events | journal = Meteoritics | volume = 29 | issue = 6| pages = 864–871 | postscript = . | doi=10.1111/j.1945-5100.1994.tb01101.x | bibcode=1994Metic..29..864Y| year = 1994 }}</ref>

Kamil Crater, discovered from [[Software:Google Earth|Google Earth]] image review in [[Place:Egypt|Egypt]], {{convert|45|m|ft|abbr=on}} in diameter and {{convert|10|m|ft|abbr=on}} deep, is thought to have been formed less than 3,500 years ago in a then-unpopulated region of western Egypt. It was found February 19, 2009 by V. de Michelle on a Google Earth image of the East Uweinat Desert, Egypt.<ref>USGS Meteoritical Society, Bulletin database, Gebel Kamil Crater ... http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meteor/metbull.php?code=52031</ref>

==== 20th-century impacts ====
[[File:Tunguska Ereignis.jpg|thumb|Trees knocked over by the [[Physics:Tunguska event|Tunguska blast]]]]

One of the best-known recorded impacts in modern times was the Tunguska event, which occurred in Siberia, Russia, in 1908.<ref>{{cite web|title=Tunguska event {{!}} Summary, Cause, & Facts|url=https://www.britannica.com/event/Tunguska-event|access-date=2021-09-25|website=Encyclopedia Britannica|language=en}}</ref> This incident involved an explosion that was probably caused by the airburst of an asteroid or comet {{convert|5|to|10|km|mi|abbr=on}} above the Earth's surface, felling an estimated 80 million trees over {{convert|2150|km2|mi2|0|abbr=on}}.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.bbc.com/earth/story/20160706-in-siberia-in-1908-a-huge-explosion-came-out-of-nowhere|title=In Siberia in 1908, a huge explosion came out of nowhere|last=Hogenboom|first=Melissa|access-date=2017-03-30}}</ref>

In February 1947, another large bolide impacted the Earth in the Sikhote-Alin Mountains, Primorye, Soviet Union. It was during daytime hours and was witnessed by many people, which allowed V. G. Fesenkov, then chairman of the meteorite committee of the USSR Academy of Science, to estimate the meteoroid's orbit before it encountered the Earth. Sikhote-Alin is a massive fall with the overall size of the [[Astronomy:Meteoroid|meteoroid]] estimated at {{convert|90000|kg|lb|abbr=on}}.  A more recent estimate by Tsvetkov (and others) puts the mass at around {{convert|100000|kg|lb|abbr=on}}.<ref name="metmag">{{cite journal |url=http://meteoritemag.uark.edu/604.htm |journal=Meteorite Magazine | date=February 1996 |title=Sikhote-Alin Revisited |first=Roy |last=Gallant |volume=2 |page=8 |bibcode=1996Met.....2....8G |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100612144717/http://meteoritemag.uark.edu/604.htm |archive-date=2010-06-12 |url-status=dead }}</ref> It was an iron meteorite belonging to the chemical group IIAB and with a coarse octahedrite structure. More than 70 [[Tonne|tonne]]s (metric tons) of material survived the collision.

A case of a human injured by a space rock occurred on November 30, 1954, in Sylacauga, Alabama.<ref>[http://imca.repetti.net/metinfo/metstruck.html Meteorite Hits Page] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090831183851/http://imca.repetti.net/metinfo/metstruck.html |date=August 31, 2009 }}</ref> There a {{convert|4|kg|lb|abbr=on}} stone chondrite crashed through a roof and hit Ann Hodges in her living room after it bounced off her radio. She was badly bruised by the fragments. Several persons have since claimed to have been struck by "meteorites" but no verifiable meteorites have resulted.

A small number of [[Astronomy:Meteorite fall|meteorite fall]]s have been observed with automated cameras and recovered following calculation of the impact point. The first was the Příbram meteorite, which fell in Czechoslovakia (now the Czech Republic) in 1959.<ref>{{Citation |last=Ceplecha |first=Z. |date=1961 |title=Multiple fall of Příbram meteorites photographed |journal=Bull. Astron. Inst. Czechoslovakia |volume=12 |pages=21–46 |bibcode=1961BAICz..12...21C }}</ref> In this case, two cameras used to photograph meteors captured images of the fireball. The images were used both to determine the location of the stones on the ground and, more significantly, to calculate for the first time an accurate orbit for a recovered meteorite.

Following the Příbram fall, other nations established automated observing programs aimed at studying infalling meteorites.<ref>Gritsevich, M.I. The Pribram, Lost City, Innisfree, and Neuschwanstein falls: An analysis of the atmospheric trajectories. Sol Syst Res 42, 372–390 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1134/S003809460805002X</ref> One of these was the [[Organization:Prairie Meteorite Network|Prairie Meteorite Network]], operated by the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory from 1963 to 1975 in the midwestern U.S. This program also observed a meteorite fall, the "Lost City" chondrite, allowing its recovery and a calculation of its orbit.<ref>{{Citation |last1=McCrosky |first1=R. E. |last2=Posen |first2=A. |last3=Schwartz |first3=G. |last4=Shao |first4=C. Y. |date=1971 |title=Lost City meteorite: Its recovery and a comparison with other fireballs |journal=J. Geophys. Res. |volume=76 |issue= 17|pages=4090–4108 |doi=10.1029/JB076i017p04090 |bibcode=1971JGR....76.4090M|hdl=2060/19710010847 |s2cid=140675097 |hdl-access=free }}</ref> Another program in Canada, the Meteorite Observation and Recovery Project, ran from 1971 to 1985. It too recovered a single meteorite, "Innisfree", in 1977.<ref>{{Citation |last1=Campbell-Brown |first1=M. D. |last2=Hildebrand |first2=A. |date=2005 |title=A new analysis of fireball data from the Meteorite Observation and Recovery Project (MORP) |journal=Earth, Moon, and Planets |volume=95 |issue=1–4 |pages=489–499 |doi=10.1007/s11038-005-0664-9 |bibcode = 2004EM&P...95..489C |s2cid=121255827 }}</ref> Finally, observations by the European Fireball Network, a descendant of the original Czech program that recovered Příbram, led to the discovery and orbit calculations for the Neuschwanstein meteorite in 2002.<ref>{{Citation |last1=Oberst |first1=J. |date=2004 |title=The multiple meteorite fall of Neuschwanstein: Circumstances of the event and meteorite search campaigns |journal=Meteoritics & Planetary Science |volume=39 |issue=10 |pages=1627–1641 |doi=10.1111/j.1945-5100.2004.tb00062.x |bibcode=2004M&PS...39.1627O |display-authors=2 |last2=Heinlein |first2=D. |last3=Spurný |first3=P.|doi-access=free }}</ref>

On August 10, 1972, a meteor which became known as the [[Astronomy:1972 Great Daylight Fireball|1972 Great Daylight Fireball]] was witnessed by many people as it moved north over the Rocky Mountains from the U.S. Southwest to Canada. It was filmed by a tourist at the Grand Teton National Park in Wyoming with an 8-millimeter color movie camera.<ref>{{YouTube|7M8LQ7_hWtE|Grand Teton Meteor Video}}</ref> In size range the object was roughly between a car and a house, and while it could have ended its life in a Hiroshima-sized blast, there was never any explosion. Analysis of the trajectory indicated that it never came much lower than {{convert|58|km|mi|0|abbr=on}} off the ground, and the conclusion was that it had grazed Earth's atmosphere for about 100 seconds, then skipped back out of the atmosphere to return to its orbit around the Sun.

Many impact events occur without being observed by anyone on the ground. Between 1975 and 1992, American missile [[Engineering:Early warning satellite|early warning satellite]]s picked up 136 major explosions in the upper atmosphere.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/astronomy/q0296.shtml|title= Collisions with Near Earth Objects|website=www.aerospaceweb.org}}</ref> In the November 21, 2002, edition of the journal ''Nature'', Peter Brown of the University of Western Ontario reported on his study of U.S. early warning satellite records for the preceding eight years. He identified 300 flashes caused by {{convert|1|to|10|m|ft|0|abbr=on}} meteors in that time period and estimated the rate of Tunguska-sized events as once in 400 years.<ref>[https://archive.today/20120910052024/http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewpr.html?pid=9865 Satellite Study Establishes Frequency of Megaton-sized Asteroid Impacts] (SpaceRef November 20, 2002)</ref> Eugene Shoemaker estimated that an event of such magnitude occurs about once every 300 years, though more recent analyses have suggested he may have overestimated by an order of magnitude.

In the dark morning hours of January 18, 2000, a [[Astronomy:Tagish Lake (meteorite)|fireball]] exploded over the city of Whitehorse, Yukon Territory at an altitude of about {{convert|26|km|mi|0|abbr=on}}, lighting up the night like day. The meteor that produced the fireball was estimated to be about {{convert|4.6|m|ft|abbr=on}} in diameter, with a weight of 180 tonnes. This blast was also featured on the Science Channel series ''Killer Asteroids'', with several witness reports from residents in Atlin, British Columbia.

==== 21st-century impacts ====
{{main|Astronomy:List of bolides}}
<!-- DDMMYYYY sequence Put 21st-c. discoveries of earlier earth impacts under appropriate heading  -->
On 7 June 2006, a meteor was observed striking Reisadalen in Nordreisa municipality in Troms County, Norway. Although initial witness reports stated that the resultant fireball was equivalent to the Hiroshima nuclear explosion, scientific analysis places the force of the blast at anywhere from 100 to 500 [[Tonne#Use of mass as proxy for energy|tonnes]] TNT equivalent, around three percent of Hiroshima's yield.<ref>[https://archive.today/20120629002618/http://skyandtelescope.com/news/article_1742_1.asp Norway Impact Gentler Than Atomic Bomb] (Sky & Telescope June 16, 2006)</ref>

On 15 September 2007, a chondritic meteor crashed near the village of Carancas in southeastern Peru near [[Earth:Lake Titicaca|Lake Titicaca]], leaving a water-filled hole and spewing gases across the surrounding area. Many residents became ill, apparently from the noxious gases shortly after the impact.

On 7 October 2008, an approximately 4 meter asteroid labeled {{mpl|2008 TC|3}} was tracked for 20 hours as it approached Earth and as it fell through the atmosphere and impacted in Sudan. This was the first time an object was detected before it reached the atmosphere and hundreds of pieces of the meteorite were recovered from the Nubian Desert.<ref>[https://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2009/03/meteorite/ First-Ever Asteroid Tracked From Space to Earth], Wired, March 25, 2009 {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140321060157/http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2009/03/meteorite/ |date=March 21, 2014 }}</ref>

[[File:Chelyabinsk meteor trace 15-02-2013.jpg|thumb|Trail left by the exploding Chelyabinsk meteor as it passed over the city.]]

On 15 February 2013, an asteroid entered Earth's atmosphere over {{wipe|Russia}} as a [[Astronomy:Bolide|fireball]] and exploded above the city of Chelyabinsk during its passage through the [[Place:Ural (region)|Ural Mountains region]] at 09:13 [[Yekaterinburg Time|YEKT]] (03:13 [[Physics:Coordinated Universal Time|UTC]]).<ref name=meteor>{{cite web|title=Russian Meteor|url=http://www.nasa.gov/topics/solarsystem/features/russianmeteor.html|publisher=NASA|access-date=15 February 2013|archive-date=18 February 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130218034325/http://www.nasa.gov/topics/solarsystem/features/russianmeteor.html|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2013/02/15/russia-meteorite/1921991/ |title=Meteor in central Russia injures at least 500 |work=[[Software:USA Today|USA Today]] |access-date=15 February 2013 |first1=Anna |last1=Arutunyan |first2=Marc |last2=Bennetts |date=15 February 2013}}</ref> The object's air burst occurred at an altitude between {{convert|30|and|50|km|mi|abbr=on}} above the ground,<ref>{{cite news |title=Meteor falls in Russia, 700 injured by blasts |url=http://bigstory.ap.org/article/meteorite-falls-russian-urals |agency=Associated Press |access-date=15 February 2013 |archive-date=18 February 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130218034039/http://bigstory.ap.org/article/meteorite-falls-russian-urals |url-status=dead }}</ref> and about 1,500 people were injured, mainly by broken window glass shattered by the shock wave. Two were reported in serious condition; however, there were no fatalities.<ref name="chelyabinsk">{{cite web |url=http://www.vesti.ru/doc.html?id=1033922|script-title=ru:Метеоритный дождь над Уралом: пострадали 1200 человек |language= ru |work= Vesti |date=15 February 2013|access-date=15 February 2013 | location = {{wipe|Russia}}}}</ref> Initially some 3,000 buildings in six cities across the region were reported damaged due to the explosion's shock wave, a figure which rose to over 7,200 in the following weeks.<ref>{{cite news|last=Marson|first=James|title=Meteorite Hits Russia, Causing Panic|url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424127887324162304578305163574597722?mod=WSJ_hpp_LEFTTopStories|newspaper=Wall Street Journal|access-date=15 February 2013|author2=Gautam Naik}}</ref><ref>{{cite magazine|last=Ewait|first=David|title=Exploding Meteorite Injures A Thousand People In Russia|url=https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidewalt/2013/02/15/exploding-meteorite-injures-a-thousand-people-in-russia/|magazine=Forbes|access-date=15 February 2013}}</ref> The Chelyabinsk meteor was estimated to have caused over $30 million in damage.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://in.reuters.com/article/russia-meteorite-idINDEE91E03320130215|title=Meteorite explodes over Russia, more than 1,000 injured|author=Andrey Kuzmin|work=Reuters|date=16 February 2013|access-date=16 February 2013|archive-date=6 March 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160306214917/http://in.reuters.com/article/russia-meteorite-idINDEE91E03320130215|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref name="RBTH-23513">{{cite news | url=http://rbth.ru/news/2013/03/05/meteorite-caused_emergency_situation_regime_over_in_chelyabinsk_region_23513.html | title=Meteorite-caused emergency situation regime over in Chelyabinsk region | work=Russia Beyond The Headlines | publisher=Rossiyskaya Gazeta | date=5 March 2013 | agency=Interfax | access-date=6 March 2013 | archive-date=23 June 2013 | archive-url=https://archive.today/20130623230931/http://rbth.ru/news/2013/03/05/meteorite-caused_emergency_situation_regime_over_in_chelyabinsk_region_23513.html | url-status=dead }}</ref> It is the largest recorded object to have encountered the Earth since the 1908 Tunguska event.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.economist.com/blogs/babbage/2013/02/asteroid-impacts?fsrc=nlw%7Cnewe%7C2-15-2013%7C5019506%7C37104620%7C|title=Asteroid impacts – How to avert Armageddon
 |newspaper=[[Finance:The Economist|The Economist]] |date=15 February 2013|access-date=16 February 2013}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/16/science/space/size-of-blast-and-number-of-injuries-are-seen-as-rare-for-a-rock-from-space.html?ref=science&_r=0|title=Size of Blast and Number of Injuries Are Seen as Rare for a Rock From Space|author=Kenneth Chang|work={{wipe|The New York Times}}|date=15 February 2013|access-date=16 February 2013}}</ref> The meteor is estimated to have an initial diameter of 17–20 metres and a mass of roughly 10,000 tonnes. On 16 October 2013, a team from Ural Federal University led by Victor Grokhovsky recovered a large fragment of the meteor from the bottom of Russia's Lake Chebarkul, about 80&nbsp;km west of the city.<ref>{{cite magazine|last=Beatty|first=J. Kelly|title=Russian Fireball Fragment Found|magazine=Australian Sky & Telescope|date=February–March 2014|page=12|issn=1832-0457}}</ref>

On 1 January 2014, a 3-meter (10 foot) asteroid, [[Astronomy:2014 AA|2014 AA]] was discovered by the [[Astronomy:Mount Lemmon Survey|Mount Lemmon Survey]] and observed over the next hour, and was soon found to be on a collision course with Earth. The exact location was uncertain, constrained to a line between Panama, the central Atlantic Ocean, The Gambia, and Ethiopia. Around roughly the time expected (2 January 3:06 UTC) an infrasound burst was detected near the center of the impact range, in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean.<ref name="Farnocchia2016">{{cite journal|title=The trajectory and atmospheric impact of asteroid 2014 AA|first1=Davide|last1=Farnocchia|first2=Steven R.|last2=Chesley|first3=Peter G.|last3=Brown|first4=Paul W.|last4=Chodas|date=1 August 2016|journal=Icarus|volume=274|pages=327–333|bibcode=2016Icar..274..327F|doi=10.1016/j.icarus.2016.02.056 }}</ref><ref name="Marcos2016">{{cite journal|title=Homing in for New Year: impact parameters and pre-impact orbital evolution of meteoroid 2014 AA|first1=C.|last1=de la Fuente Marcos|first2=R.|last2=de la Fuente Marcos|first3=P.|last3=Mialle|date=13 October 2016|journal=[[Physics:Astrophysics and Space Science|Astrophysics and Space Science]]|volume=361|issue=11|pages=358 (33 pp.)|arxiv=1610.01055|bibcode=2016Ap&SS.361..358D |doi=10.1007/s10509-016-2945-3|s2cid=119251345}}</ref> This marks the second time a natural object was identified prior to impacting earth after 2008 TC3.

Nearly two years later, on October 3, [[Astronomy:WT1190F|WT1190F]] was detected orbiting Earth on a highly eccentric orbit, taking it from well within the [[Astronomy:Geocentric orbit|Geocentric satellite ring]] to nearly twice the orbit of the Moon. It was estimated to be perturbed by the Moon onto a collision course with Earth on November 13. With over a month of observations, as well as precovery observations found dating back to 2009, it was found to be far less dense than a natural asteroid should be, suggesting that it was most likely an unidentified artificial satellite. As predicted, it fell over Sri Lanka at 6:18 UTC (11:48 local time). The sky in the region was very overcast, so only an airborne observation team was able to successfully observe it falling above the clouds. It is now thought to be a remnant of the [[Astronomy:Lunar Prospector|Lunar Prospector]] mission in 1998, and is the third time any previously unknown object – natural or artificial – was identified prior to impact.

On 22 January 2018, an object, A106fgF, was discovered by the [[Astronomy:Asteroid Terrestrial-impact Last Alert System|Asteroid Terrestrial-impact Last Alert System]] (ATLAS) and identified as having a small chance of impacting Earth later that day.<ref>[https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/mpml/conversations/messages/33680 Bill Gray MPML]{{dead link|date=December 2023|bot=medic}}{{cbignore|bot=medic}}</ref> As it was very dim, and only identified hours before its approach, no more than the initial 4 observations covering a 39-minute period were made of the object. It is unknown if it impacted Earth or not, but no fireball was detected in either infrared or infrasound, so if it did, it would have been very small, and likely near the eastern end of its potential impact area – in the western Pacific Ocean.

On 2 June 2018, the [[Astronomy:Mount Lemmon Survey|Mount Lemmon Survey]] detected {{mpl|2018 LA}} (ZLAF9B2), a small 2–5 meter asteroid which further observations soon found had an 85% chance of impacting Earth. Soon after the impact, a fireball report from Botswana arrived to the [[Organization:American Meteor Society|American Meteor Society]]. Further observations with ATLAS extended the observation arc from 1 hour to 4 hours and confirmed that the asteroid orbit indeed impacted Earth in southern Africa, fully closing the loop with the fireball report and making this the third natural object confirmed to impact Earth, and the second on land after {{mp|2008 TC|3}}.<ref name="orientation">{{cite journal
|last1=de la Fuente Marcos |first1=Carlos
|last2=de la Fuente Marcos |first2=Raúl
|date=18 June 2018
|title=On the Pre-impact Orbital Evolution of 2018 LA, Parent Body of the Bright Fireball Observed Over Botswana on 2018 June 2
|journal=[[Astronomy:Research Notes of the AAS|Research Notes of the AAS]]
|volume=2
|issue=2
|page=57
|arxiv=1806.05164
|bibcode=2018RNAAS...2...57D
|doi=10.3847/2515-5172/aacc71|s2cid=119325928
|doi-access=free
}}</ref><ref name="pre-impact2">{{cite journal
|last1=de la Fuente Marcos |first1=Carlos
|last2=de la Fuente Marcos |first2=Raúl
|date=26 July 2018
|title=Pre-airburst Orbital Evolution of Earth's Impactor 2018 LA: An Update
|journal=[[Astronomy:Research Notes of the AAS|Research Notes of the AAS]]
|volume=2
|issue=3
|page=131
|arxiv=1807.08322
|bibcode=2018RNAAS...2..131D
|doi=10.3847/2515-5172/aad551|s2cid=119208392
|doi-access=free
}}</ref><ref name="excess">{{cite journal |last1=de la Fuente Marcos |first1=C. |last2=de la Fuente Marcos | first2= R.|title=Waiting to make an impact: A probable excess of near-Earth asteroids in 2018 LA-like orbits |journal=Astronomy and Astrophysics |volume= 621|pages= A137|date=2019 |doi=10.1051/0004-6361/201834313
 |arxiv=1811.11845 |bibcode=2019A&A...621A.137D|s2cid=119538516 }}</ref>

On 8 March 2019, [[Organization:NASA|NASA]] announced the detection of a large airburst that occurred on 18 December 2018 at 11:48 local time off the eastern coast of the Kamchatka Peninsula. The Kamchatka superbolide is estimated to have had a mass of roughly 1600 tons, and a diameter of 9 to 14 meters depending on its density, making it the third largest asteroid to impact Earth since 1900, after the Chelyabinsk meteor and the Tunguska event. The fireball exploded in an airburst {{convert|25.6|km|mi}} above Earth's surface.

2019 MO, an approximately 4m asteroid, was detected by [[Astronomy:Asteroid Terrestrial-impact Last Alert System|ATLAS]] a few hours before it impacted the Caribbean Sea near Puerto Rico in June 2019.<ref>{{Cite web |date=25 June 2019 |title=Breakthrough: UH team successfully locates incoming asteroid |url=https://legacy.ifa.hawaii.edu/info/press-releases/ATLAS_2019MO/ |access-date=12 March 2023 |website=Institute for Astronomy – University of Hawaii}}</ref>

In 2023, a small meteorite is believed to have crashed through the roof of a home in Trenton, New Jersey. The metallic rock was approximately 4 inches by 6 inches and weighed 4 pounds. The item was seized by police and tested for radioactivity.<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://apnews.com/article/meteorite-hits-home-hopewell-new-jersey-fd8391f8c5daea1e596ed85ed3ae5a68 |title=Possible meteorite crashes into New Jersey home, no injuries |date=May 9, 2023 |publisher=AP News |access-date=May 10, 2023}}</ref> The object was later confirmed to be a meteorite by scientists at The College of New Jersey, as well as meteorite expert Jerry Delaney, who previously worked at Rutgers University and the American Museum of Natural History.<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://apnews.com/article/meteorite-hits-home-hopewell-new-jersey-91fecf2eb7e5ffb938bfb68920dc6011 |title=Experts: Metallic object that crashed into New Jersey home was a meteorite |date=May 11, 2023 |publisher=AP News |access-date=May 14, 2023}}</ref>

===== Asteroid impact prediction =====
{{main|Astronomy:Asteroid impact prediction}}

[[File:2018 LA-orbit.png|thumb|250px|[[Physics:Orbit|Orbit]] and positions of 2018 LA and Earth, 30 days before impact. The diagram illustrates how orbit data can be used to predict impacts well in advance. Note that in this particular instance the asteroid's orbit was not known until a few hours before impact. The diagram was constructed afterwards for illustration.]]

In the late 20th and early 21st century scientists put in place measures to detect Near Earth objects, and predict the dates and times of asteroids impacting Earth, along with the locations at which they will impact. The [[Organization:International Astronomical Union|International Astronomical Union]] [[Organization:Minor Planet Center|Minor Planet Center]] (MPC) is the global clearing house for information on asteroid orbits. [[Organization:NASA|NASA]]'s [[Astronomy:Sentry (monitoring system)|Sentry System]] continually scans the MPC catalog of known asteroids, analyzing their orbits for any possible future impacts.<ref>{{YouTube|id=53Js-_vo3mo|title=How Does NASA Spot a Near-Earth Asteroid?}}</ref> Currently none are predicted (the single highest probability impact currently listed is ~7 m asteroid {{mpl|2010 RF|12}}, which is due to pass earth in September 2095 with only a 5% predicted chance of impacting).<ref>{{cite web|title=Sentry: Earth Impact Monitoring|url=https://cneos.jpl.nasa.gov/sentry/|website=Jet Propulsion Laboratory|publisher=NASA|access-date=25 August 2018}}</ref>

Currently prediction is mainly based on cataloging asteroids years before they are due to impact. This works well for larger asteroids (> 1 [[Kilometre|km]] across) as they are easily seen from a long distance. Over 95% of them are already known and their [[Physics:Orbit|orbit]]s have been measured, so any future impacts can be predicted long before they are on their final approach to Earth. Smaller objects are too faint to observe except when they come very close and so most cannot be observed before their final approach. Current mechanisms for detecting asteroids on final approach rely on wide-field ground based telescopes, such as the ATLAS system. However, current telescopes only cover part of the Earth and even more importantly cannot detect asteroids on the day-side of the planet, which is why so few of the smaller asteroids that commonly impact Earth are detected during the few hours that they would be visible.<ref name="JPL-2017-SDT-Update">{{cite news
  |title      = Update to Determine the Feasibility of Enhancing the Search and Characterization of NEOs
  |work       = Near-Earth Object Science Definition Team Report 2017
  |publisher  = NASA
  |url        = https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/atoms/files/2017_neo_sdt_final_e-version.pdf
  |access-date = 7 July 2018}}</ref>
So far only four impact events have been successfully predicted, all from innocuous 2–5 m diameter asteroids and detected a few hours in advance.

{{wide image|SmallAsteroidImpacts-Frequency-Bolide-20141114.jpg|500px|align-cap=center|Ground based telescopes can only detect objects approaching on the night-side of the planet, away from the [[Astronomy:Sun|Sun]]. Roughly half of impacts occur on the day-side of the planet.}}

===Current response status===
{{main|Astronomy:Asteroid impact avoidance}}
In April 2018, the [[Organization:B612 Foundation|B612 Foundation]] reported "It's 100 per cent certain we’ll be hit [by a devastating asteroid], but we're not 100 per cent certain when."<ref name="INQ-20180428"/> Also in 2018, [[Physicist|physicist]] [[Biography:Stephen Hawking|Stephen Hawking]], in his final book ''Brief Answers to the Big Questions'', considered an asteroid collision to be the biggest threat to the planet.<ref name="WP-20181015"/><ref name="QZ-20181014"/><ref name="NYT-20180618"/> In June 2018, the US National Science and Technology Council warned that America is unprepared for an [[Astronomy:Asteroid impact avoidance|asteroid impact event]], and has developed and released the ''"[https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/National-Near-Earth-Object-Preparedness-Strategy-and-Action-Plan-23-pages-1MB.pdf National Near-Earth Object Preparedness Strategy Action Plan]"'' to better prepare.<ref name="WH-20180621"/><ref name="GIZ-20180621"/><ref name="ICARUS-220180522"/><ref name="NYT-20180614"/><ref name="NYT-20180614c"/> According to expert testimony in the United States Congress in 2013, [[Organization:NASA|NASA]] would require at least five years of preparation to launch a mission to intercept an asteroid.<ref name="US-Congress-20130410" />  The preferred method is to deflect rather than disrupt an asteroid.<ref name="PHYS-20190304">{{cite news |author=Johns Hopkins University
 |title=Asteroids are stronger, harder to destroy than previously thought
 |url=https://phys.org/news/2019-03-asteroids-stronger-harder-previously-thought.html
}}</ref><ref name="ICRS-20190315">{{cite journal |last1=El Mir |first1=Charles |last2=Ramesh |first2=KT |last3=Richardson |first3=Derek C.
 |title=A new hybrid framework for simulating hypervelocity asteroid impacts and gravitational reaccumulation
 |date=15 March 2019 |journal=Icarus |volume=321 |pages=1013–1025
 |doi= 10.1016/j.icarus.2018.12.032|bibcode=2019Icar..321.1013E|s2cid=127119234 }}</ref><ref name="NYT-20190308">{{cite news |last=Andrews |first=Robin George
 |title=If We Blow Up an Asteroid, It Might Put Itself Back Together – Despite what Hollywood tells us, stopping an asteroid from creating an extinction-level event by blowing it up may not work.
 |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/08/science/asteroids-nuclear-weapons.html
 |date=8 March 2019 |work={{wipe|The New York Times}} |access-date=9 March 2019}}</ref>

==Elsewhere in the Solar System==

===Evidence of massive past impact events===
[[Image:Aitken Kagu big.jpg|thumb|Topographical map of the South Pole–Aitken basin based on Kaguya data provides evidence of a massive impact event on the Moon some 4.3 billion years ago]]

Impact craters provide evidence of past impacts on other planets in the Solar System, including possible interplanetary terrestrial impacts. Without carbon dating, other points of reference are used to estimate the timing of these impact events. Mars provides some significant evidence of possible interplanetary collisions. The [[Astronomy:North Polar Basin (Mars)|North Polar Basin]] on Mars is speculated by some to be evidence for a planet-sized impact on the surface of Mars between 3.8 and 3.9 billion years ago, while [[Astronomy:Utopia Planitia|Utopia Planitia]] is the largest confirmed impact and [[Astronomy:Hellas Planitia|Hellas Planitia]] is the largest visible crater in the Solar System. The Moon provides similar evidence of massive impacts, with the [[Astronomy:South Pole–Aitken basin|South Pole–Aitken basin]] being the biggest. [[Astronomy:Mercury (planet)|Mercury]]'s Caloris Basin is another example of a crater formed by a massive impact event. Rheasilvia on [[Astronomy:4 Vesta|Vesta]] is an example of a crater formed by an impact capable of, based on ratio of impact to size, severely deforming a planetary-mass object. Impact craters on the [[Astronomy:Moons of Saturn|moons of Saturn]] such as Engelier and Gerin on Iapetus, Mamaldi on [[Astronomy:Rhea (moon)|Rhea]] and Odysseus on Tethys and Herschel on Mimas form significant surface features. Models developed in 2018 to explain the unusual spin of [[Astronomy:Uranus|Uranus]] support a long-held theory that this was caused by an oblique collision with a massive object twice the size of Earth.<ref name="KegerreisTeodoro2018">{{cite journal|last1=Kegerreis|first1=J. A.|last2=Teodoro|first2=L. F. A.|last3=Eke|first3=V. R.|last4=Massey|first4=R. J.|last5=Catling|first5=D. C.|last6=Fryer|first6=C. L.|last7=Korycansky|first7=D. G.|last8=Warren|first8=M. S.|last9=Zahnle|first9=K. J.|title=Consequences of Giant Impacts on Early Uranus for Rotation, Internal Structure, Debris, and Atmospheric Erosion|journal=The Astrophysical Journal|volume=861|issue=1|year=2018|page=52|issn=1538-4357|doi=10.3847/1538-4357/aac725|arxiv=1803.07083|bibcode=2018ApJ...861...52K|s2cid=54498331 |doi-access=free }}</ref>

===Observed events===

====Jupiter====
[[File:Impact site of fragment G.png|thumb|Comet Shoemaker-Levy 9's scar on Jupiter (dark area near Jupiter's limb)]]
{{Main|Astronomy:Impact events on Jupiter}}

[[Astronomy:Jupiter|Jupiter]] is the most massive planet in the [[Astronomy:Solar System|Solar System]], and because of its large mass it has a vast sphere of gravitational influence, the region of space where an [[Astronomy:Asteroid capture|asteroid capture]] can take place under favorable conditions.<ref>{{cite journal|first=G.A. |last=Chebotarev |title=Gravitational Spheres of the Major Planets, Moon and Sun |journal=Soviet Astronomy |volume=7 |page=620 |url= http://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1964SvA.....7..618C |year=1964|bibcode=1964SvA.....7..618C }}</ref>

Jupiter is able to capture [[Astronomy:Comet|comet]]s in orbit around the Sun with a certain frequency. In general, these comets travel some revolutions around the planet following unstable orbits as highly elliptical and perturbable by solar gravity. While some of them eventually recover a [[Astronomy:Heliocentric orbit|heliocentric orbit]], others crash on the planet or, more rarely, on its satellites.<ref>{{cite journal|last=Tancredi |first=G. |year=1990 |title=Temporary Satellite Capture and Orbital Evolution of Comet P/Helin-Roman-Crockett |journal=Astronomy and Astrophysics |volume=239 |issue=1–2 |bibcode=1990A&A...239..375T |pages=375–380 |url=http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1990A%26A...239..375T }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|last=Ohtsuka |first=Katsuhito|title=Quasi-Hilda Comet 147P/Kushida-Muramatsu: Another long temporary satellite capture by Jupiter |journal=Astronomy & Astrophysics |year=2008|volume=489|issue=3|page=1355|doi=10.1051/0004-6361:200810321|arxiv=0808.2277|bibcode=2008A&A...489.1355O|s2cid=14201751|url=http://www.arm.ac.uk/preprints/2008/531.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130226040659/http://www.arm.ac.uk/preprints/2008/531.pdf|url-status=dead |archive-date=2013-02-26 }}</ref>

In addition to the mass factor, its relative proximity to the inner solar system allows Jupiter to influence the distribution of minor bodies there. For a long time it was believed that these characteristics led the gas giant to expel from the system or to attract most of the wandering objects in its vicinity and, consequently, to determine a reduction in the number of potentially dangerous objects for the Earth. Subsequent dynamic studies have shown that in reality the situation is more complex: the presence of Jupiter, in fact, tends to reduce the frequency of impact on the Earth of objects coming from the [[Astronomy:Oort cloud|Oort cloud]],<ref>{{cite journal|url=http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010IJAsB...9....1H |title=Jupiter – friend or foe? III: the Oort cloud comets |first=J. |last=Horner |author2=Jones, B.W.; Chambers, J. |year=2010 |journal=International Journal of Astrobiology |volume=9 |number=1 |pages=1–10 |doi=10.1017/S1473550409990346 |arxiv=0911.4381 |bibcode=2010IJAsB...9....1H |s2cid=1103987 }}</ref> while it increases it in the case of asteroids<ref>{{cite journal |first=J. |last=Horner |author2=Jones, B.W. |title=Jupiter: Friend or foe? I: the asteroids |year=2008 |journal=International Journal of Astrobiology |volume=7 |number=3&4 |pages=251–261 |doi=10.1017/S1473550408004187 |arxiv=0806.2795 |bibcode=2008IJAsB...7..251H |s2cid=8870726 }}</ref> and short period comets.<ref>{{cite journal |first=J. |last=Horner |author2=Jones, B.W. |title=Jupiter – friend or foe? II: the Centaurs |year=2009 |journal=International Journal of Astrobiology |volume=8 |number=2 |pages=75–80 |doi=10.1017/S1473550408004357 |arxiv=0903.3305 |bibcode=2009IJAsB...8...75H |s2cid=8032181 |url=http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009IJAsB...8...75H }}</ref>

For this reason Jupiter is the planet of the Solar System characterized by the highest frequency of impacts, which justifies its reputation as the "sweeper" or "cosmic vacuum cleaner" of the Solar System.<ref name=Overbye>{{cite news |title=Jupiter: Our Cosmic Protector?|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/26/weekinreview/26overbye.html|author=Dennis Overbye|magazine=The New York Times|page=WK7|year=2009}}</ref> 2009 studies suggest an impact frequency of one every 50–350 years, for an object of 0.5–1&nbsp;km in diameter; impacts with smaller objects would occur more frequently. Another study estimated that comets {{convert|0.3|km|abbr=on}} in diameter impact the planet once in approximately 500 years and those {{convert|1.6|km|abbr=on}} in diameter do so just once in every 6,000 years.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Roulston |first1=M.S. |date=March 1997 |title=Impact Mechanics and Frequency of SL9-Type Events on Jupiter |journal=Icarus |volume=126 |issue=1 |pages=138–147 |doi=10.1006/icar.1996.5636 |last2=Ahrens |first2=T |bibcode=1997Icar..126..138R}}</ref>

In July 1994, [[Astronomy:Comet Shoemaker–Levy 9|Comet Shoemaker–Levy 9]] was a comet that broke apart and collided with Jupiter, providing the first direct observation of an extraterrestrial collision of Solar System objects.<ref name=NASA2005>{{cite web|url=http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary/comet.html |title=Comet Shoemaker–Levy 9 Collision with Jupiter |access-date=2008-08-26 |publisher=[[Astronomy:National Space Science Data Center|National Space Science Data Center]] |date=February 2005}}</ref> The event served as a "wake-up call", and astronomers responded by starting programs such as [[Astronomy:Lincoln Near-Earth Asteroid Research|Lincoln Near-Earth Asteroid Research]] (LINEAR), [[Organization:Near-Earth Asteroid Tracking|Near-Earth Asteroid Tracking]] (NEAT), Lowell Observatory Near-Earth Object Search (LONEOS) and several others which have drastically increased the rate of asteroid discovery.

The 2009 impact event happened on July 19 when a new black spot about the size of Earth was discovered in Jupiter's southern hemisphere by [[Astronomy:Amateur astronomy|amateur astronomer]] Anthony Wesley. Thermal infrared analysis showed it was warm and spectroscopic methods detected ammonia. [[Organization:Jet Propulsion Laboratory|JPL]] scientists confirmed that there was another impact event on Jupiter, probably involving a small undiscovered comet or other icy body.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.cnn.com/2009/TECH/space/07/21/jupiter.nasa.meteor.scar/index.html|title=Mystery impact leaves Earth-sized mark on Jupiter|publisher=CNN | date=July 21, 2009}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|last=Overbye|first=Dennis|title=All Eyepieces on Jupiter After a Big Impact|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/22/science/space/22jupiter.html?hpw|newspaper=New York Times|date=July 22, 2009}}</ref><ref>[https://www.theguardian.com/science/2009/jul/21/jupiter-scar-comet-asteroid-crash Amateur astronomer spots Earth-size scar on Jupiter], Guardian, July 21, 2009</ref> The impactor is estimated to have been about 200–500 meters in diameter.

Later minor impacts were observed by amateur astronomers in 2010, 2012, 2016, and 2017; one impact was observed by ''[[Engineering:Juno (spacecraft)|Juno]]'' in 2020.

====Other impacts====
[[File:Asteroid Collision Hubble.jpg|thumb|Hubble's Wide Field Camera 3 clearly shows the slow evolution of the debris coming from asteroid P/2010 A2, assumed to be due to a collision with a smaller asteroid.]]

In 1998, two comets were observed plunging toward the [[Astronomy:Sun|Sun]] in close succession. The first of these was on June 1 and the second the next day. A video of this, followed by a dramatic ejection of solar gas (unrelated to the impacts), can be found at the NASA<ref>{{cite web|url=https://sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov/hotshots/2000_02_07/|title=SOHO Hotshots|website=sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov|access-date=2019-01-23}}</ref> website. Both of these comets evaporated before coming into contact with the surface of the Sun. According to a theory by NASA [[Organization:Jet Propulsion Laboratory|Jet Propulsion Laboratory]] scientist Zdeněk Sekanina, the latest impactor to actually make contact with the Sun was the "supercomet" Howard-Koomen-Michels on August 30, 1979.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://home.earthlink.net/~tonyhoffman/SOHOfaq.htm#sunstrikers|title=A SOHO and Sungrazing Comet FAQ|website=home.earthlink.net|access-date=2019-01-23|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120805113942/http://home.earthlink.net/~tonyhoffman/SOHOfaq.htm#sunstrikers|archive-date=2012-08-05|url-status=dead}}{{self-published source|date=February 2017}}</ref>{{self-published inline|date=February 2017}} (See also sungrazer.)

In 2010, between January and May, [[Astronomy:Hubble Space Telescope|Hubble]]'s Wide Field Camera 3<ref>[http://www.spacetelescope.org/news/heic1016/ Hubble finds that a bizarre X-shaped intruder is linked to an unseen asteroid collision], www.spacetelescope.org October 13, 2010.</ref> took images of an unusual X shape originated in the aftermath of the collision between asteroid P/2010 A2 with a smaller [[Astronomy:Asteroid|asteroid]].

Around March 27, 2012, based on evidence, there were signs of an impact on [[Astronomy:Mars|Mars]]. Images from the [[Astronomy:Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter|Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter]] provide compelling evidence of the largest impact observed to date on Mars in the form of fresh craters, the largest measuring 48.5 by 43.5 meters. It is estimated to be caused by an impactor 3 to 5 meters long.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://mars.nasa.gov/news/nasa-mars-weathercam-helps-find-big-new-crater|title=NASA Mars Weathercam Helps Find Big New Crater|last=mars.nasa.gov|website=NASA's Mars Exploration Program|language=en|access-date=2019-01-23}}</ref>

On March 19, 2013, an impact occurred on the Moon that was visible from Earth, when a boulder-sized 30&nbsp;cm meteoroid slammed into the lunar surface at 90,000&nbsp;km/h (25&nbsp;km/s; 56,000&nbsp;mph) creating a 20-meter crater.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://blog.nationalgeographic.org/2013/05/17/nasa-announces-brightest-lunar-explosion-ever-recorded/|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181127131344/https://blog.nationalgeographic.org/2013/05/17/nasa-announces-brightest-lunar-explosion-ever-recorded/|url-status=dead|archive-date=November 27, 2018|title=NASA Announces Brightest Lunar Explosion Ever Recorded|date=2013-05-17|website=National Geographic Society Newsroom|language=en-US|access-date=2019-01-23}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.space.com/21259-moon-crash-meteor-impact-webcast.html|title=Moon Crash Scene Investigation Tonight: See Telescope Views of Meteorite Impact|last1=Kramer|first1=Miriam|last2=May 22|first2=Space com Staff Writer {{!}}|website=Space.com|access-date=2019-01-23|last3=ET|first3=2013 12:09pm|date=22 May 2013}}</ref> NASA has actively monitored lunar impacts since 2005,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.nasa.gov/centers/marshall/news/lunar/index.html|title=Lunar Impacts|last=Mohon|first=Lee|date=2017-02-13|website=NASA|access-date=2019-01-23|archive-date=2018-12-23|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181223031432/https://www.nasa.gov/centers/marshall/news/lunar/index.html|url-status=dead}}</ref> tracking hundreds of candidate events.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.nasa.gov/centers/marshall/pdf/155422main_ALAMO_lunar_impact_observations294.pdf|title=NASA Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC) – Automated Lunar and Meteor Observatory (ALaMO) – Candidate lunar impact observation database|access-date=2013-05-27|archive-date=2013-04-06|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130406093118/http://www.nasa.gov/centers/marshall/pdf/155422main_ALAMO_lunar_impact_observations294.pdf|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.nasa.gov/centers/marshall/pdf/155422main_ALAMO_lunar_impact_observations294.pdf|title=List of lunar impact events|last=Marshall|first=Spaceflight Center|access-date=2019-01-23|archive-date=2020-08-01|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200801205744/https://www.nasa.gov/centers/marshall/pdf/155422main_ALAMO_lunar_impact_observations294.pdf|url-status=dead}}</ref>

On 18 September 2021 an impact event on Mars formed a cluster of craters, the largest being 130m in diameter. On 24 December 2021 an impact created a 150m-wide crater. Debris was ejected up to 35&nbsp;km (19 miles) from the impact site.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Amos |first=Jonathan |date=27 October 2022 |title=Nasa space probes document big impacts on Mars |language=en-GB |work=BBC News |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-63418056 |access-date=28 October 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221028013508/https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-63418056 |archive-date=28 October 2022}}</ref>

==Extrasolar impacts==
[[File:PIA18469-AsteroidCollision-NearStarNGC2547-ID8-2013.jpg|thumb|left|Asteroid collision led to the building of planets near star NGC 2547-ID8 (artist concept).]]
Collisions between galaxies, or [[Astronomy:Galaxy merger|galaxy merger]]s, have been observed directly by space telescopes such as Hubble and Spitzer. However, collisions in planetary systems including stellar collisions, while long speculated, have only recently begun to be observed directly.

In 2013, an impact between minor planets was detected around the star NGC 2547 ID 8 by Spitzer and confirmed by ground observations. Computer modelling suggests that the impact involved large asteroids or [[Astronomy:Protoplanet|protoplanet]]s similar to the events believed to have led to the formation of terrestrial planets like the Earth.<ref name="space.com"/>

==See also==
{{div col}}
* {{annotated link|Astronomy:Asteroid capture}}
* {{annotated link|Astronomy:Asteroid impact avoidance}}
* {{annotated link|Organization:B612 Foundation}}
* {{annotated link|Earth Impact Database}}
* {{annotated link|Unsolved:Global catastrophic risk}}
* {{annotated link|Astronomy:Late Heavy Bombardment}}
* [[Astronomy:List of bolides|List of bolides]]
* [[Earth:List of impact craters on Earth|List of impact craters on Earth]]
* [[Earth:List of possible impact structures on Earth|List of possible impact structures on Earth]]
* {{annotated link|Astronomy:Meteor air burst}}
* {{annotated link|Astronomy:Near-Earth object}}
* {{annotated link|Astronomy:Near-Earth Object Camera}}
* {{annotated link|Palermo Technical Impact Hazard Scale}}
* {{annotated link|Astronomy:Pan-STARRS}}
* {{annotated link|Astronomy:Peak ring (crater)}}
* {{annotated link|Astronomy:Potentially hazardous object}}
* {{annotated link|Astronomy:Spaceguard}}
* {{annotated link|Astronomy:Torino scale}}, 0 to 10
{{div col end}}

==References==
{{reflist|30em
| refs =

<ref name="US-Congress-20130410">{{cite web |author=U.S.Congress |title=Threats From Space: a Review of U.S. Government Efforts to Track and mitigate Asteroids and Meteors (Part I and Part II) – Hearing Before the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology House of Representatives One Hundred Thirteenth Congress First Session |url=http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CHRG-113hhrg80552/pdf/CHRG-113hhrg80552.pdf |date=Spring 2013 |type=Hearings held 19 March 2013 and 10 April 2013 |page=147 |work=United States Congress |access-date=3 May 2014 }}</ref>

<ref name="Earth-impact">{{cite web
  |date=2010
  |title=Earth Impact Effects Program
  |publisher=Imperial College London / Purdue University
  |author1=Robert Marcus |author2=H. Jay Melosh |author3=Gareth Collins |url=http://impact.ese.ic.ac.uk/ImpactEffects/
  |access-date=2013-02-04}} (solution using 2600kg/m^3, 17km/s, 45 degrees)</ref>

<ref name="UCB2013">{{cite web
  |date=February 7, 2013
  |title=New evidence comet or asteroid impact was last straw for dinosaurs
  |publisher=UC Berkeley News Center
  |author=Robert Sanders
  |url=http://newscenter.berkeley.edu/2013/02/07/new-evidence-comet-or-asteroid-impact-was-last-straw-for-dinosaurs/
  |access-date=2013-02-11}}</ref>

<!-- <ref name="science">{{cite web
  |date=Jan 28, 2013
  |title=Record Setting Asteroid Flyby
  |publisher=NASA Science
  |url=https://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2013/28jan_2012da/
  |access-date=2013-01-29}}</ref>

<ref name="Tunguska">{{cite web
  |date=June 30, 2008
  |title=The Tunguska Impact – 100 Years Later
  |publisher=NASA Science News
  |author= Tony Phillips
  |url=https://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2008/30jun_tunguska/
  |access-date=2013-02-12}}</ref>
 -->
}}

==Further reading==
* {{Citation |last1=Alvarez |first1=L. W. |last2=Alvarez |first2=W. |last3=Asaro |first3=F. |last4=Michel |first4=H. V. |date=1980 |title=Extraterrestrial Cause for the Cretaceous-Tertiary Extinction |journal=Science |volume=208 |pmid=17783054 |issue=4448 |pages=1095–1108 |doi=10.1126/science.208.4448.1095 |bibcode = 1980Sci...208.1095A |citeseerx=10.1.1.126.8496 |s2cid=16017767 }}
* {{citation |last=Benton |first=Michael J. |title=When Life Nearly Died: The Greatest Mass Extinction of All Time |date=2003 |publisher=Thames and Hudson |location=New York |isbn=978-0500051160 |url=https://archive.org/details/whenlifenearlydi00bent }}
* {{cite journal |last1=Brown |first1=P. G. |last2=Assink |first2=J. D. |last3=Astiz |first3=L. |last4=Blaauw |first4=R. |last5=Boslough |first5=M. B. |last6=Borovička |first6=J. |last7=Brachet |first7=N. |last8=Brown |first8=D. |last9=Campbell-Brown |first9=M. |last10=Ceranna |first10=L. |last11=Cooke |first11=W. |last12=de Groot-Hedlin |first12=C. |last13=Drob |first13=D. P. |last14=Edwards |first14=W. |last15=Evers |first15=L. G. |last16=Garces |first16=M. |last17=Gill |first17=J. |last18=Hedlin |first18=M. |last19=Kingery |first19=A. |last20=Laske |first20=G. |last21=Le Pichon |first21=A. |last22=Mialle |first22=P. |last23=Moser |first23=D. E. |last24=Saffer |first24=A. |last25=Silber |first25=E. |last26=Smets |first26=P. |last27=Spalding |first27=R. E. |last28=Spurný |first28=P. |last29=Tagliaferri |first29=E. |last30=Uren |first30=D. |last31=Weryk |first31=R. J. |last32=Whitaker |first32=R. |last33=Krzeminski |first33=Z. |date=2013 |title=A 500-kiloton airburst over Chelyabinsk and an enhanced hazard from small impactors |journal=Nature |volume=503 |issue=7475 |pages=238–241 |bibcode=2013Natur.503..238B |doi=10.1038/nature12741 |display-authors=29 |pmid=24196713|hdl=10125/33201 |s2cid=4450349 |url=https://repository.tudelft.nl/islandora/object/uuid%3A02a22da9-f92f-4bec-bfb8-c3d9192a8ef5/datastream/OBJ/download |hdl-access=free }}
* {{Citation |last1=Smit |first1=J. |last2=Hertogen |first2=J. |date=1980 |title=An extraterrestrial event at the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary |journal=Nature |volume=285 |issue=5762 |pages=198–200 |doi=10.1038/285198a0 |bibcode = 1980Natur.285..198S |s2cid=4339429 }}
* {{Citation |last=Stone |first=R. |date=August 2008 |title=Target earth |newspaper=National Geographic Magazine |url= http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2008/08/earth-scars/stone-text |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20080718082921/http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2008/08/earth-scars/stone-text |url-status= dead |archive-date= July 18, 2008 }}
* {{cite journal |last1=Yau |first1=Kevin |last2=Weissman |first2=Paul |last3=Yeomans |first3=Donald |date=1994 |title=Meteorite falls in China and some related human casualty events |journal=Meteoritics |volume=29 |issue=6 |pages=864–871 |bibcode=1994Metic..29..864Y |issn=0026-1114 |doi=10.1111/j.1945-5100.1994.tb01101.x }}

==External links==
* [http://www.passc.net/EarthImpactDatabase/ Earth Impact Database]
*[https://impact.ese.ic.ac.uk/ImpactEarth/ImpactEffects/ Earth Impact Effects Program] Estimates crater size and other effects of a specified body colliding with Earth. 
* [http://craterexplorer.ca/alphabetical/ Exploring North American Impact Craters]

{{Modern impact events}}
{{Impact cratering on Earth}}
{{Navboxes|list=
{{Planetary defense}}
{{Doomsday}}
{{Natural disasters}}
}}

{{DEFAULTSORT:Impact Event}}
[[Category:Impact events| ]]
[[Category:Planetary science]]
[[Category:Astronomical events]]

{{Sourceattribution|Impact event}}