View source for Biography:Jürgen Habermas

{{Infobox philosopher
| name             = Jürgen Habermas
| image            = Habermas10 (14298469242).jpg
| caption          = Habermas in 2014
| birth_date       = {{Birth date and age|df=y|1929|6|18}}
| birth_place      = Gummersbach, Rhine Province, Prussia, Germany
| region           = [[Philosophy:Western philosophy|Western philosophy]]
| era              = [[Philosophy:Contemporary philosophy|Contemporary philosophy]]
| school_tradition = {{hlist| [[Philosophy:Continental philosophy|Continental philosophy]] | [[Philosophy:Critical theory|Critical theory]] | [[Neopragmatism]]<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.iep.utm.edu/pragmati/ |title=Pragmatism |website=iep.utm.edu|publisher=Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy}}</ref> }}
| education        = [[Organization:University of Bonn|University of Bonn]] (PhD)<br />[[Organization:University of Marburg|University of Marburg]] (Dr. phil. hab.)
| main_interests   = {{hlist| [[Philosophy:Epistemology|Epistemology]] | [[Social:Social theory|Social theory]] | Political theory | Philosophy of Law | [[Social:Rationalization (sociology)|Rationalization]] | [[Philosophy:Pragmatics|Pragmatics]] | [[Philosophy:Pragmatism|Pragmatism]] }}
| notable_ideas = {{plainlist}}
* [[Transhumanism#Debate|''Brave New World'' argument]]
* [[Social:Communicative action|Communicative action]]
* [[Philosophy:Communicative rationality|Communicative rationality]]
* [[Philosophy:Constitutional patriotism|Constitutional patriotism]]
* Criticism of left fascism
* [[Structuralism#Interpretations and general criticisms|Criticism of structuralism]]
* Criticism of subject-centered reason
* [[Social:Deliberative democracy|Deliberative democracy]]
* [[Philosophy:Discourse ethics|Discourse ethics]]
* The Enlightenment as an unfinished project
* [[Social:Instrumental and value-rational action|Instrumental and value-rational action]]
* Monological-dialogical ethics distinction<ref>Anders Bordum, "Immanuel Kant, Jürgen Habermas and the categorical imperative", ''Philosophy & Social Criticism'' '''31'''(7), 2005.</ref>
* [[Performative contradiction]]
* [[Philosophy:Postsecularism|Postsecularism]]
* Post-metaphysical philosophy
* [[Philosophy:Rational reconstruction|Rational reconstruction]]
* [[Social:Social system|System]]–[[Philosophy:Lifeworld|lifeworld]] distinction
* Structural transformation of the public sphere
* [[Philosophy:Universal pragmatics|Universal pragmatics]]
| signature = Jürgen Habermas signature.jpg
| influences       = {{hlist| [[Biography:Max Weber|Weber]] | [[Biography:Émile Durkheim|Durkheim]] | [[Biography:George Herbert Mead|Mead]] | [[Biography:Sigmund Freud|Freud]] | [[Biography:Karl Marx|Marx]]  | [[Biography:Wilhelm Dilthey|Dilthey]] | [[Biography:Talcott Parsons|Parsons]] | [[Biography:Immanuel Kant|Kant]] |[[Biography:Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph Schelling|Schelling]] | [[Biography:Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel|Hegel]] | [[Biography:Martin Heidegger|Heidegger]] | [[Biography:Jean Piaget|Piaget]] | [[Biography:Max Horkheimer|Horkheimer]] | [[Biography:Theodor W. Adorno|Adorno]] | [[Biography:Herbert Marcuse|Marcuse]] | [[Biography:Ludwig Wittgenstein|Wittgenstein]] | [[Biography:Charles Sanders Peirce|Peirce]] | [[Biography:J. L. Austin|Austin]] | Abendroth | [[Biography:Karl Bühler|Bühler]]<ref>Christian Damböck (ed.), ''Influences on the Aufbau'', Springer, 2015, p. 258.</ref> }}
| influenced       = {{hlist| Offe | [[Biography:Axel Honneth|Honneth]] | [[Biography:Thomas A. McCarthy|McCarthy]] | [[Biography:Hans-Hermann Hoppe|Hoppe]] | [[Biography:Seyla Benhabib|Benhabib]] | [[Biography:Nancy Fraser|Fraser]] | [[Biography:Michael Friedman (philosopher)|Friedman]] | [[Biography:Nikolas Kompridis|Kompridis]]}}
| spouse           = Ute Wesselhöft
}}

'''Jürgen Habermas''' ({{IPAc-en|UK|ˈ|h|ɑː|b|ər|m|æ|s}}, {{IPAc-en|US|-|m|ɑː|s}};<ref>[https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/habermas "Habermas"]. ''Collins English Dictionary''.</ref> {{IPA-de|ˈjʏʁɡn̩ ˈhaːbɐmaːs|lang}};<ref>Max Mangold and Dudenredaktion: ''Duden Aussprachewörterbuch.'' In: ''Der Duden in zwölf Bänden.'' Volume 6, 6th edition, Dudenverlag, Mannheim/Leipzig/Wien/Zürich 2005 {{ISBN|978-3-411-04066-7}}, "Jürgen" p. 446 and "Habermas" p. 383.</ref><ref>{{cite book|last1=Krech|first1=Eva-Maria|last2=Stock|first2=Eberhard|last3=Hirschfeld|first3=Ursula|last4=Anders|first4=Lutz Christian|title=Deutsches Aussprachewörterbuch|trans-title=German Pronunciation Dictionary|language=German|year=2009|publisher=Walter de Gruyter|location=Berlin|isbn=978-3-11-018202-6|pp=561, 629}}</ref> born 18 June 1929) is a German [[Biography:Philosopher|philosopher]] and [[Social:Sociologist|sociologist]] in the tradition of [[Philosophy:Critical theory|critical theory]] and [[Philosophy:Pragmatism|pragmatism]]. His work addresses [[Philosophy:Communicative rationality|communicative rationality]] and the [[Philosophy:Public sphere|public sphere]].

Associated with the [[Philosophy:Frankfurt School|Frankfurt School]], Habermas's work focuses on the foundations of [[Philosophy:Epistemology|epistemology]] and [[Social:Social theory|social theory]], the analysis of advanced capitalism and [[Social:Democracy|democracy]], the [[Philosophy:Rule of law|rule of law]] in a critical [[Social:Sociocultural evolution|social-evolutionary context]], albeit within the confines of the natural law tradition,<ref>Cf. Thomas Kupka, [https://www.jstor.org/stable/23999017?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents Jürgen Habermas' diskurstheoretische Reformulierung des klassischen Vernunftrechts], ''Kritische Justiz'' 27 (1994), pp. 461-469. The continuity with the natural law tradition was controversial at the time, see the reply by Habermas' PhD-student Klaus Günther, Diskurstheorie des Rechts oder liberales Naturrecht in diskurstheoretischem Gewande?, ''[https://www.jstor.org/stable/23999018?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents Kritische Justiz]'' 27 (1994), pp. 470-487.</ref> and contemporary politics, particularly German politics. Habermas's theoretical system is devoted to revealing the possibility of reason, emancipation, and rational-critical communication latent in modern institutions and in the human capacity to deliberate and pursue rational interests. Habermas is known for his work on the concept of [[Philosophy:Modernity|modernity]], particularly with respect to the discussions of [[Social:Rationalization (sociology)|rationalization]] originally set forth by [[Biography:Max Weber|Max Weber]]. He has been influenced by American pragmatism, [[Social:Action theory (sociology)|action theory]], and poststructuralism.

==Biography==
{{Frankfurt School}}

Habermas was born in Gummersbach, Rhine Province, in 1929. He was born with a [[Medicine:Cleft lip and cleft palate|cleft palate]] and had corrective surgery twice during childhood.<ref>{{cite document|title=Disabling Democracy: How Disability Reconfigures Deliberative Democratic Norms|first1=Clifford|last1=Simplican|last2=Stacy|date=28 October 2017|publisher=|ssrn = 1451092}}</ref> Habermas argues that his speech disability made him think differently about the importance of deep dependence and of communication.<ref>Habermas, Jurgen. 2008. Between Naturalism and Religion: Philosophical Essays. (First chapter).</ref>

As a young teenager, he was profoundly affected by World War II. Until his graduation from gymnasium, Habermas lived in Gummersbach, near Cologne. His father, Ernst Habermas, was Executive director of the Cologne Chamber of Industry and Commerce, and was described by Habermas as a Nazi sympathizer and, from 1933, a member of the NSDAP. Habermas himself was a ''Jungvolkführer'', a leader of the German Jungvolk, which was a section of the Hitler Youth. He was brought up in a staunchly Protestant milieu, his grandfather being the director of the seminary in Gummersbach. He studied at the universities of Göttingen (1949/50), [[Organization:University of Zurich|Zurich]] (1950/51), and [[Organization:University of Bonn|Bonn]] (1951–54) and earned a doctorate in philosophy from Bonn in 1954 with a dissertation written on the conflict between the absolute and history in [[Biography:Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph Schelling|Schelling's]] thought, entitled, ''{{lang|de|Das Absolute und die Geschichte. Von der Zwiespältigkeit in Schellings Denken}}'' ("The Absolute and History: On the Schism in Schelling's Thought"). His dissertation committee included [[Biography:Erich Rothacker|Erich Rothacker]] and [[Biography:Oskar Becker|Oskar Becker]].<ref>{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/?id=IOLWAAAAMAAJ|title=Das Absolute und die Geschichte: von der Zwiespältigkeit in Schellings Denken|first=Jurgen|last=Habermas |date=1954|publisher=Gummers}}</ref>

From 1956 on, he studied philosophy and sociology under the critical theorists [[Biography:Max Horkheimer|Max Horkheimer]] and [[Biography:Theodor W. Adorno|Theodor W. Adorno]] at the [[Organization:Goethe University Frankfurt|Goethe University Frankfurt]]'s Institute for Social Research, but because of a rift between the two over his dissertation—Horkheimer had made unacceptable demands for revision—as well as his own belief that the [[Philosophy:Frankfurt School|Frankfurt School]] had become paralyzed with political skepticism and disdain for modern culture,<ref name=cjc352>Craig J. Calhoun, ''Contemporary Sociological Theory'', Wiley-Blackwell, 2002, p. 352. {{ISBN|0-631-21350-3}}.</ref> he finished his [[Social:Habilitation|habilitation]] in political science at the [[Organization:University of Marburg|University of Marburg]] under the Marxist Wolfgang Abendroth. His habilitation work was entitled ''{{lang|de|Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit. Untersuchungen zu einer Kategorie der bürgerlichen Gesellschaft}}'' (published in English translation in 1989 as ''The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society''). It is a detailed social history of the development of the bourgeois public sphere from its origins in the 18th century salons up to its transformation through the influence of capital-driven mass media. In 1961 he became a ''[[Social:Privatdozent|Privatdozent]]'' in Marburg, and—in a move that was highly unusual for the German academic scene of that time—he was offered the position of "extraordinary professor" (professor without chair) of philosophy at the University of Heidelberg (at the instigation of [[Biography:Hans-Georg Gadamer|Hans-Georg Gadamer]] and [[Biography:Karl Löwith|Karl Löwith]]) in 1962, which he accepted. In this same year he gained his first serious public attention, in Germany, with the publication of his habilitation. In 1964, strongly supported by Adorno, Habermas returned to Frankfurt to take over Horkheimer's chair in philosophy and sociology. The philosopher [[Biography:Albrecht Wellmer|Albrecht Wellmer]] was his assistant in Frankfurt from 1966 to 1970.

He accepted the position of Director of the Max Planck Institute for the Study of the Scientific-Technical World in Starnberg (near [[Place:Munich|Munich]]) in 1971, and worked there until 1983, two years after the publication of his magnum opus, ''The Theory of Communicative Action''. He was elected a Foreign Honorary Member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences in 1984.<ref name=AAAS>{{cite web|title=Book of Members, 1780&ndash;2010: Chapter H|url=http://www.amacad.org/publications/BookofMembers/ChapterH.pdf|publisher=American Academy of Arts and Sciences|accessdate=19 April 2011}}</ref>

Habermas then returned to his chair at Frankfurt and the directorship of the Institute for Social Research. Since retiring from Frankfurt in 1993, Habermas has continued to publish extensively. In 1986, he received the Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Prize of the {{lang|de|[[Organization:Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft|Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft]]}}, which is the highest honour awarded in German research. He also holds the position of "Permanent Visiting" Professor at [[Organization:Northwestern University|Northwestern University]] in Evanston, Illinois, and "Theodor Heuss Professor" at [[Organization:The New School|The New School]], {{wipe|New York City}}.

Habermas was awarded The Prince of Asturias Award in Social Sciences of 2003. Habermas was also the 2004 Kyoto Laureate<ref>[http://homepage.mac.com/gedavis/JH/Kyoto_lecture_Nov_2004.pdf Public space and political public sphere] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120204151440/http://homepage.mac.com/gedavis/JH/Kyoto_lecture_Nov_2004.pdf |date=2012-02-04 }} (pp. 2&ndash;4).</ref> in the Arts and Philosophy section. He traveled to San Diego and on 5 March 2005, as part of the University of San Diego's Kyoto Symposium, gave a speech entitled ''The Public Role of Religion in Secular Context'', regarding the evolution of [[Religion:Separation of church and state|separation of church and state]] from neutrality to intense [[Philosophy:Secularism|secularism]]. He received the 2005 Holberg International Memorial Prize (about €520,000). In 2007, Habermas was listed as the seventh most-cited author in the [[Social:Humanities|humanities]] (including the [[Social:Social science|social science]]s) by ''The Times Higher Education Guide'', ahead of Max Weber and behind [[Biography:Erving Goffman|Erving Goffman]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?storyCode=405956&sectioncode=26 |title=The most cited authors of books in the humanities |publisher=timeshighereducation.co.uk |date=2009-03-26 |accessdate=2009-11-16}}</ref>

Jürgen Habermas is the father of Rebekka Habermas, historian of German social and cultural history and professor of modern history at the University of Göttingen.

===Teacher and mentor===
Habermas is a famed teacher and mentor. Among his most prominent students were the pragmatic philosopher Herbert Schnädelbach (theorist of discourse distinction and rationality), the political sociologist Claus Offe (professor at the [[Organization:Hertie School of Governance|Hertie School of Governance]] in Berlin), the social philosopher Johann Arnason (professor at La Trobe University and chief editor of the journal ''[[Social:Thesis Eleven|Thesis Eleven]]''), the social philosopher Hans-Herbert Kögler (Chair of Philosophy at the [[Organization:University of North Florida|University of North Florida]]), the sociological theorist Hans Joas (professor at the [[Organization:University of Erfurt|University of Erfurt]] and at the [[Organization:University of Chicago|University of Chicago]]), the theorist of societal [[Biology:Evolution|evolution]] Klaus Eder, the social philosopher [[Biography:Axel Honneth|Axel Honneth]] (the current director of the Institute for Social Research), the political theorist David Rasmussen  (professor at Boston College and chief editor of the journal "Philosophy & Social Criticism"), the environmental ethicist [[Biography:Konrad Ott|Konrad Ott]], the anarcho-capitalist philosopher [[Biography:Hans-Hermann Hoppe|Hans-Hermann Hoppe]] (who came to reject much of Habermas's thought),<ref>Lew Rockwell, introduction to Hoppe's ''A Short History of Man'' (2015), Auburn, Mississippi: Mises Institute, p. 9.</ref> the American philosopher [[Biography:Thomas A. McCarthy|Thomas McCarthy]], the co-creator of mindful inquiry in social research Jeremy J. Shapiro, and the assassinated Serbian prime minister Zoran Đinđić.

==Philosophy and sociology==
Habermas has constructed a comprehensive framework of philosophy and social theory drawing on a number of intellectual traditions:<ref name="Habermas, Jurgen 1981">Habermas, Jurgen (1981), ''Kleine Politische Schrifen I-IV'', pp. 500f.</ref>
* the German philosophical thought of [[Biography:Immanuel Kant|Immanuel Kant]], Friedrich Schelling, [[Biography:Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel|G. W. F. Hegel]], [[Biography:Wilhelm Dilthey|Wilhelm Dilthey]], [[Biography:Edmund Husserl|Edmund Husserl]] and [[Biography:Hans-Georg Gadamer|Hans-Georg Gadamer]]
* the [[Philosophy:Marxist philosophy|Marxian]] tradition—both the theory of [[Biography:Karl Marx|Karl Marx]] himself as well as the critical [[Social:Neo-Marxism|neo-Marxian]] theory of the [[Philosophy:Frankfurt School|Frankfurt School]], i.e. [[Biography:Max Horkheimer|Max Horkheimer]], Theodor Adorno and [[Biography:Herbert Marcuse|Herbert Marcuse]].<ref name="Habermas, Jurgen 1981"/>
* the sociological theories of [[Biography:Max Weber|Max Weber]], [[Biography:Émile Durkheim|Émile Durkheim]] and [[Biography:George Herbert Mead|George Herbert Mead]]
* the [[Philosophy:Linguistic philosophy|linguistic philosophy]] and [[Philosophy:Speech act|speech act]] theories of [[Biography:Ludwig Wittgenstein|Ludwig Wittgenstein]], [[Biography:J. L. Austin|J. L. Austin]], [[Biography:P. F. Strawson|P. F. Strawson]], [[Biography:Stephen Toulmin|Stephen Toulmin]] and [[Biography:John Searle|John Searle]]
* the developmental psychology of [[Biography:Jean Piaget|Jean Piaget]] and [[Biography:Lawrence Kohlberg|Lawrence Kohlberg]]
* the American pragmatist tradition of [[Biography:Charles Sanders Peirce|Charles Sanders Peirce]] and [[Biography:John Dewey|John Dewey]]
* the sociological [[Social:Social system|social systems theory]] of [[Biography:Talcott Parsons|Talcott Parsons]] and [[Biography:Niklas Luhmann|Niklas Luhmann]]
* Neo-Kantian thought<ref>Müller-Doohm, Stefan. Jürgen Habermas. Frankfurt, Suhrkamp, 2008 (Suhrkamp BasisBiographie, 38).</ref>

Jürgen Habermas considers his major contribution to be the development of the concept and theory of communicative reason or communicative rationality, which distinguishes itself from the [[Philosophy:Rationalism|rationalist tradition]], by locating [[Philosophy:Rationality|rationality]] in structures of interpersonal linguistic [[Biology:Communication|communication]] rather than in the structure of the [[Astronomy:Cosmos|cosmos]]. This social theory advances the goals of human emancipation, while maintaining an inclusive universalist [[Philosophy:Morality|moral]] framework. This framework rests on the argument called [[Philosophy:Universal pragmatics|universal pragmatics]]—that all speech acts have an inherent telos (the [[Social:Greek language|Greek]] word for "purpose")—the goal of mutual [[Philosophy:Understanding|understanding]], and that human beings possess the communicative competence to bring about such understanding. Habermas built the framework out of the speech-act philosophy of [[Biography:Ludwig Wittgenstein|Ludwig Wittgenstein]], [[Biography:J. L. Austin|J. L. Austin]] and [[Biography:John Searle|John Searle]], the sociological theory of the interactional constitution of mind and self of [[Biography:George Herbert Mead|George Herbert Mead]], the [[Philosophy:Moral development|theories of moral development]] of [[Biography:Jean Piaget|Jean Piaget]] and [[Biography:Lawrence Kohlberg|Lawrence Kohlberg]], and the [[Philosophy:Discourse ethics|discourse ethics]] of his Frankfurt colleague and fellow student [[Biography:Karl-Otto Apel|Karl-Otto Apel]].

Habermas's works resonate within the traditions of Kant and the Enlightenment and of [[Social:Democratic socialism|democratic socialism]] through his emphasis on the potential for transforming the world and arriving at a more humane, just, and egalitarian society through the realization of the human potential for reason, in part through discourse ethics. While Habermas has stated that the Enlightenment is an "unfinished project," he argues it should be corrected and complemented, not discarded.<ref name=cjc351>Calhoun (2002), p. 351.</ref> In this he distances himself from the Frankfurt School, criticizing it, as well as much of postmodernist thought, for excessive pessimism, [[Philosophy:Political radicalism|radicalism]], and exaggerations.<ref name=cjc351/>

Within sociology, Habermas's major contribution was the development of a comprehensive theory of societal evolution and modernization focusing on the difference between communicative rationality and rationalization on one hand and strategic / instrumental rationality and rationalization on the other. This includes a critique from a communicative standpoint of the differentiation-based [[Theory|theory]] of [[Social:Social system|social system]]s developed by [[Biography:Niklas Luhmann|Niklas Luhmann]], a student of [[Biography:Talcott Parsons|Talcott Parsons]].

His defence of modernity and [[Social:Civil society|civil society]] has been a source of inspiration to others, and is considered a major philosophical alternative to the varieties of poststructuralism. He has also offered an influential analysis of [[Finance:Late capitalism|late capitalism]].

Habermas perceives the rationalization, [[Philosophy:Humanism|humanization]] and [[Social:Democratization|democratization]] of society in terms of the institutionalization of the potential for rationality that is inherent in the [[Social:Communicative competence|communicative competence]] that is unique to the human species. Habermas contends that communicative competence has developed through the course of evolution, but in contemporary society it is often suppressed or weakened by the way in which major domains of social life, such as the [[Finance:Market (economics)|market]], the [[Earth:State (polity)|state]], and [[Organization:Organization|organization]]s, have been given over to or taken over by strategic/instrumental rationality, so that the logic of the system supplants that of the [[Philosophy:Lifeworld|lifeworld]].

===Reconstructive science===
Habermas introduces the concept of "reconstructive science" with a double purpose: to place the "general theory of society" between philosophy and social science and re-establish the rift between the "great theorization" and the "empirical research".
The model of "[[Philosophy:Rational reconstruction|rational reconstruction]]s" represents the main thread of the surveys about the "structures" of the world of life ("culture", "society" and "personality") and their respective "functions" (cultural reproductions, social integrations and socialization). For this purpose, the dialectics between "symbolic representation" of "the structures subordinated to all worlds of
life" ("internal relationships") and the "material reproduction" of the social systems in their complex ("external relationships" between social systems and environment) has to be considered.

This model finds an application, above all, in the "theory of the social evolution", starting from the reconstruction of the necessary conditions for a [[Biology:Phylogenetic tree|phylogeny]] of the socio-cultural life forms (the "hominization") until an analysis of the development of "social formations", which Habermas subdivides into primitive, traditional, modern and contemporary formations.
"This paper is an attempt, primarily, to formalize the model of "reconstruction of the logic of development" of "social formations" summed up by Habermas through the differentiation between vital world and social systems (and, within them, through the "rationalization of the world of life" and the "growth in complexity of the social systems"). Secondly, it tries to offer some methodological clarifications about the "explanation of the dynamics" of "historical processes" and, in particular, about the "theoretical meaning" of the evolutional theory's propositions.  Even if the German sociologist considers that the "ex-post rational reconstructions" and "the models system/environment" cannot have a complete "historiographical application", these certainly act as a general premise in the argumentative structure of the "historical explanation"".<ref name="Corchia">{{citation | first = Luca | last = Corchia | chapter = Explicative models of complexity. The reconstructions of social evolution for Jürgen Habermas | editor1-first = S | editor-last = Balbi | editor2-first = G | editor2-last = Scepi | editor3-first = G | editor3-last = Russolillo | editor4-first = A |display-editors = 3 | editor4-last = Stawinoga | chapter-url = http://www.jovene.it/articoli/details.php?nome=Catalogo&ID=38140&Tipo=listino&Oggetto=Novit%C3%A0 | title = Book of Short Abstracts | volume = 7th International Conference on Social Science Methodology&nbsp;– RC33&nbsp;– Logic and Methodology in Sociology | place = Napoli, IT | date = 1 September 2008 | publisher = Jovene Editore }}</ref>

===The public sphere===
{{details|public sphere}}
In ''The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere,'' Habermas argues that prior to the 18th century, European culture had been dominated by a "representational" culture, where one party sought to "represent" itself on its audience by overwhelming its subjects.<ref name=Blanning26>Blanning, T. C. W. ''The French Revolution Class War or Culture Clash?'', New York: St. Martin's Press (1987), 2nd edition 1998, p. 26.</ref> As an example of "representational" culture, Habermas argued that Louis XIV's Palace of Versailles was meant to show the greatness of the French state and its King by overpowering the senses of visitors to the Palace.<ref name=Blanning26 /> Habermas identifies "representational" culture as corresponding to the feudal stage of development according to Marxist theory, arguing that the coming of the capitalist stage of development marked the appearance of ''Öffentlichkeit'' (the public sphere).<ref name="Blanning, T.C.W. pages 26-27">Blanning (1998), pp. 26–27.</ref> In the culture characterized by ''Öffentlichkeit'', there occurred a public space outside of the control by the state, where individuals exchanged views and knowledge.<ref name="Blanning, T.C.W. page 27">Blanning (1998), p. 27.</ref>

In Habermas's view, the growth in [[Biology:Newspaper|newspaper]]s, journals, reading clubs, Masonic lodges, and coffeehouses in 18th-century Europe, all in different ways, marked the gradual replacement of "representational" culture with ''Öffentlichkeit'' culture.<ref name="Blanning, T.C.W. page 27" /> Habermas argued that the essential characteristic of the ''Öffentlichkeit'' culture was its "critical" nature.<ref name="Blanning, T.C.W. page 27" /> Unlike "representational" culture where only one party was active and the other passive, the ''Öffentlichkeit'' culture was characterized by a dialogue as individuals either met in conversation, or exchanged views via the print media.<ref name="Blanning, T.C.W. page 27" /> Habermas maintains that as Britain was the most liberal country in Europe, the culture of the public sphere emerged there first around 1700, and the growth of ''Öffentlichkeit'' culture took place over most of the 18th century in Continental Europe.<ref name="Blanning, T.C.W. page 27" /> In his view, the {{wipe|French Revolution}} was in large part caused by the collapse of "representational" culture, and its replacement by ''Öffentlichkeit'' culture.<ref name="Blanning, T.C.W. page 27" /> Though Habermas's main concern in ''The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere'' was to expose what he regarded as the deceptive nature of free institutions in the West, his book had a major effect on the historiography of the French Revolution.<ref name="Blanning, T.C.W. pages 26-27" />

According to Habermas, a variety of factors resulted in the eventual decay of the public sphere, including the growth of a commercial [[Social:Mass media|mass media]], which turned the critical public into a passive consumer public; and the welfare state, which merged the state with society so thoroughly that the public sphere was squeezed out. It also turned the "public sphere" into a site of self-interested contestation for the resources of the state rather than a space for the development of a public-minded rational consensus.

His most known work to date, the ''Theory of Communicative Action'' (1981), is based on an adaptation of Talcott Parsons AGIL Paradigm. In this work, Habermas voiced criticism of the process of modernization, which he saw as inflexible direction forced through by economic and administrative rationalization.<ref name=cjc353>Calhoun (2002), p. 353.</ref> Habermas outlined how our everyday lives are penetrated by formal systems as parallel to development of the [[Social:Welfare state|welfare state]], [[Finance:Corporate capitalism|corporate capitalism]] and mass consumption.<ref name=cjc353/> These reinforcing trends rationalize public life.<ref name=cjc353/> Disfranchisement of citizens occurs as political parties and interest groups become rationalized and [[Social:Representative democracy|representative democracy]] replaces [[Social:Participatory democracy|participatory one]].<ref name=cjc353/> In consequence, boundaries between public and private, the individual and society, the [[Social:Social system|system]] and the lifeworld are deteriorating.<ref name=cjc353/> Democratic public life cannot develop where matters of public importance are not discussed by citizens.<ref name=cjc354>Calhoun (2002), p. 354.</ref> An "ideal speech situation"<ref>{{cite book |title=Democracy, Power and Legitimacy: The Critical Theory of Jürgen Habermas |last=Payrow Shabani |first=Omid A. |year=2003 |publisher=University of Toronto Press |isbn= 978-0-8020-8761-4 |page=49 |url=https://books.google.com/?id=tKDU3l3cq60C&pg=PA49}}</ref> requires participants to have the same capacities of discourse, social equality and their words are not confused by ideology or other errors.<ref name=cjc354/> In this version of the [[Philosophy:Consensus theory of truth|consensus theory of truth]] Habermas maintains that truth is what would be agreed upon in an ideal speech situation.

Habermas has expressed optimism about the possibility of the revival of the public sphere.<ref name=cjc355>Calhoun (2002), p. 355.</ref> He discerns a hope for the future where the representative democracy-reliant nation-state is replaced by a [[Social:Deliberative democracy|deliberative democracy]]-reliant political organism based on the equal rights and obligations of citizens.<ref name=cjc355/> In such a direct democracy-driven system, the activist public sphere is needed for debates on matters of public importance and as well as the mechanism for that discussion to affect the decision-making process.

==== Criticism ====
Several noted academics have provided various criticisms of Habermas's notions regarding the public sphere. John B. Thompson, a Professor of Sociology at the [[Organization:University of Cambridge|University of Cambridge]] and a fellow of [[Organization:Jesus College, Cambridge|Jesus College, Cambridge]],<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.jesus.cam.ac.uk/contacts/fellows/profiles/thompson.html|title=Jesus College website|website=cam.ac.uk|accessdate=28 October 2017|url-status=dead|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20080601125221/http://www.jesus.cam.ac.uk/contacts/fellows/profiles/thompson.html|archivedate=1 June 2008}}</ref> has claimed that Habermas's notion of the public sphere is antiquated due to the proliferation of mass-media communications.{{Citation needed|date=July 2018}}

Michael Schudson from the [[Organization:University of California, San Diego|University of California, San Diego]] argues more generally that a public sphere as a place of purely rational independent debate never existed.{{Citation needed|date=February 2012}}

[[Biography:Nancy Fraser|Nancy Fraser]], the Henry A. and Louise Loeb Professor of Political and Social Science and professor of philosophy at [[Organization:The New School|The New School]] in {{wipe|New York City}},<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.newschool.edu/nssr/faculty/?id=4e54-6b31-4d41-3d3d|title=Departments - The New School for Social Research (NSSR)|author=|date=|website=www.newschool.edu|accessdate=28 October 2017}}</ref> is a noted feminist critic of Habermas's work on the public sphere, arguing for the existence of multiple spheres and counterpublics.

==Habermas versus postmodernists==
Habermas offered some early criticisms in an essay, "Modernity versus Postmodernity" (1981), which has achieved wide recognition. In that essay, Habermas raises the issue of whether, in light of the failures of the twentieth century, we "should try to hold on to the ''intentions of the Enlightenment'', feeble as they may be, or should we declare the entire project of modernity a lost cause?"<ref name="Ritzer, George Pg. 567-568">Ritzer, George, ''Sociological Theory'', ''From Modern to Postmodern Social Theory (and Beyond)'', McGraw-Hill Higher Education, New York, New York, 2008, pp. 567&ndash;568.</ref> Habermas refuses to give up on the possibility of a rational, "scientific" understanding of the life-world.

Habermas has several main criticisms of [[Philosophy:Postmodernism|postmodernism]]:

# The postmodernists are equivocal about whether they are producing serious theory or literature;
# Habermas feels that the postmodernists are animated by normative sentiments but the nature of those sentiments remains concealed from the reader;
# Habermas accuses postmodernism of a totalizing perspective that fails "to differentiate phenomena and practices that occur within modern society";<ref name="Ritzer, George Pg. 567-568"/>
# Habermas asserts that postmodernists ignore that which Habermas finds absolutely central – namely, everyday life and its practices.

==Key dialogues==

===''Historikerstreit'' (Historians' Quarrel)===
Habermas is famous as a public intellectual as well as a scholar; most notably, in the 1980s he used the popular press to attack the German historians Ernst Nolte, Michael Stürmer, Klaus Hildebrand and Andreas Hillgruber. Habermas first expressed his views on the above-mentioned historians in the ''Die Zeit'' on 11 July 1986 in a ''feuilleton'' (a type of culture and arts opinion essay in German newspapers) entitled "A Kind of Settlement of Damages". Habermas criticized Nolte, Hildebrand, Stürmer and Hillgruber for "apologistic" history writing in regard to the Nazi era, and for seeking to "close Germany's opening to the West" that in Habermas's view had existed since 1945.<ref>Habermas, Jürgen, "A Kind of Settlement of Damages On Apologetic Tendencies In German History Writing", pp. 34&ndash;44 from ''Forever In the Shadow of Hitler?'' ed. Ernst Piper, Humanities Press, Atlantic Highlands, 1993, p. 43.</ref>

Habermas argued that Nolte, Stürmer, Hildebrand and Hillgruber had tried to detach Nazi rule and the [[Social:The Holocaust|Holocaust]] from the mainstream of German history, explain away Nazism as a reaction to Bolshevism, and partially rehabilitate the reputation of the Wehrmacht (German Army) during [[Social:World War II|World War II]]. Habermas wrote that Stürmer was trying to create a "vicarious religion" in German history which, together with the work of Hillgruber, glorifying the last days of the German Army on the Eastern Front, was intended to serve as a "kind of NATO philosophy colored with German nationalism".<ref>Habermas, Jürgen "A Kind of Settlement of Damages" pp. 34&ndash;44 from ''Forever In The Shadow of Hitler?'' ed. Piper (1993), pp. 42&ndash;43.</ref> About Hillgruber's statement that Adolf Hitler wanted to exterminate the Jews "because only such a 'racial revolution' could lend permanence to the world-power status of his ''Reich''", Habermas wrote: "Since Hillgruber does not use the verb in the subjunctive, one does not know whether the historian has adopted the perspective of the particulars this time too".<ref>Habermas, Jürgen "A Kind of Settlement of Damages" pp. 34&ndash;44 from ''Forever In The Shadow of Hitler?'' ed. Piper (1993), pp. 37&ndash;38.</ref>

Habermas wrote: "The unconditional opening of the Federal Republic to the political culture of the West is the greatest intellectual achievement of our postwar period; my generation should be especially proud of this. This event cannot and should not be stabilized by a kind of NATO philosophy colored with German nationalism. The opening of the Federal Republic has been achieved precisely by overcoming the ideology of Central Europe that our revisionists are trying to warm up for us with their geopolitical drumbeat about "the old geographically central position of the Germans in Europe" (Stürmer) and "the reconstruction of the destroyed European Center" (Hillgruber). The only patriotism that will not estrange us from the West is a constitutional patriotism."<ref>Habermas in Piper (1993) p. 43</ref>

The so-called ''Historikerstreit'' ("Historians' Quarrel") was not at all one-sided, because Habermas was himself attacked by scholars like Joachim Fest,<ref>Fest, Joachim, "Encumbered Remembrance: The Controversy about the Incomparability of National-Socialist Mass Crimes", pp. 63&ndash;71 & "Postscript, April 21, 1987", pp. 264&ndash;265 from ''Forever In The Shadow of Hitler?'' ed. Piper (1993), pp. 64&ndash;65.</ref> Hagen Schulze,<ref>Schulze, Hagen, "Questions We Have To Face: No Historical Stance without National Identity" pp. 93&ndash;97 from ''Forever In The Shadow of Hitler?'' ed. Piper (1993), p. 94.</ref> Horst Möller,<ref>Möller, Horst, "What May Not Be, Cannot Be: A Plea for Rendering Factual the Controversy about Recent History", pp. 216&ndash;221, ''Forever In The Shadow of Hitler?'' ed. Piper (1993), pp. 216&ndash;218.</ref> Imanuel Geiss<ref>Geiss, Imanuel, "On the ''Historikerstreit''", pp. 254&ndash;258 from ''Forever In The Shadow Of Hitler?'' ed. Piper (1993), p. 256.</ref> and Klaus Hildebrand.<ref>Hildebrand, Klaus, "The Age of Tyrants: History and Politics The Administrators of the Enlightenment, the Risk of Scholarship and the Preservation of a Worldview A Reply to Jürgen Habermas", pp. 50&ndash;55, & "He Who Wants To Escape the Abyss Will Have Sound It Very Precisely: Is the New German History Writing Revisionist?" pp. 188&ndash;195 from ''Forever In The Shadow of Hitler?'' ed. Piper (1993).</ref> In turn, Habermas was supported by historians such as Martin Broszat,<ref>Broszat, Martin, "Where the Roads Part: History Is Not A Suitable Substitute for a Religion of Nationalism", pp. 123&ndash;129, ''Forever In The Shadow of Hitler?'' ed. Piper (1993), p. 127.</ref> Eberhard Jäckel,<ref>Jäckel, Eberhard, "The Impoverished Practice of Insinuation: The Singular Aspect of National Socialist Crimes Cannot Be Denied", pp. 74&ndash;78 from ''Forever In The Shadow of Hitler?'' ed. Piper (1993), pp. 74&ndash;75.</ref> Hans Mommsen,<ref>Mommsen, Hans, "The New Historical Consciousness and the Relativizing of National Socialism", pp. 114&ndash;124 from ''Forever In The Shadow of Hitler?'' ed. Piper (1993), pp. 114&ndash;115.</ref> and Hans-Ulrich Wehler.<ref>Evans, Richard, ''In Hitler's Shadow'', New York: Pantheon Books, 1989, pp. 159&ndash;160.</ref>

===Habermas and Derrida===
Habermas and [[Biography:Jacques Derrida|Jacques Derrida]] engaged in a series of disputes beginning in the 1980s and culminating in a mutual understanding and friendship in the late 1990s that lasted until Derrida's death in 2004.<ref name="Derrida, J. Pp. 300-306">{{Citation |last=Derrida |first=J |title=Honesty of Thought |work=The Derrida-Habermas Reader |editor=Lasse Thomassen |place=Chicago Ill |publisher=The University of Chicago Press |year=2006 |page=302 |isbn=9780226796833}}</ref> They originally came in contact when Habermas invited Derrida to speak at The University of Frankfurt in 1984. The next year Habermas published "Beyond a Temporalized Philosophy of Origins: Derrida" in ''[[Philosophy:The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity|The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity]]'' in which he described Derrida's method as being unable to provide a foundation for social critique.<ref>Thomassen, L. "Introduction: Between Deconstruction and Rational Reconstruction" in ''The Derrida-Habermas Reader'', ed. Thomassen (2006), pp. 1&ndash;7. P.2.</ref> Derrida, citing Habermas as an example, remarked that, "those who have accused me of reducing philosophy to literature or logic to rhetoric ... have visibly and carefully avoided reading me".<ref>Derrida, J., "Is There a Philosophical Language?" in ''The Derrida-Habermas Reader'', ed. Thomassen (2006), pp. 35&ndash;45. P.37.</ref> After Derrida's final rebuttal in 1989 the two philosophers did not continue, but, as Derrida described it, groups in the academy "conducted a kind of 'war', in which we ourselves never took part, either personally or directly".<ref name="Derrida, J. Pp. 300-306"/>

At the end of the 1990s, Habermas approached Derrida at a party held at an American university where both were lecturing. They then met at Paris over dinner, and participated afterwards in many joint projects. In 2000 they held a joint seminar on problems of philosophy, right, ethics, and politics at the University of Frankfurt.<ref name="Derrida, J. Pp. 300-306"/> In December 2000, in Paris, Habermas gave a lecture entitled "How to answer the ethical question?" at the ''Judeities. Questions for Jacques Derrida'' conference organized by Joseph Cohen and Raphael Zagury-Orly. Following the lecture by Habermas, both thinkers engaged in a very heated debate on Heidegger and the possibility of Ethics. The conference volume was published at the Editions Galilée (Paris) in 2002, and subsequently in English at Fordham University Press (2007).

In the aftermath of the September 11 attacks, Derrida and Habermas laid out their individual opinions on 9/11 and the War on Terror in [[Biography:Giovanna Borradori|Giovanna Borradori]]'s ''Philosophy in a Time of Terror: Dialogues with Jürgen Habermas and Jacques Derrida''. In early 2003, both Habermas and Derrida were very active in opposing the coming Iraq War; in a manifesto that later became the book ''Old Europe, New Europe, Core Europe'', the two called for a tighter unification of the states of the [[Social:European Union|European Union]] in order to create a power capable of opposing American foreign policy. Derrida wrote a foreword expressing his unqualified subscription to Habermas's declaration of February 2003 ("February 15, or, What Binds Europeans Together: Plea for a Common Foreign Policy, Beginning in Core Europe") in the book, which was a reaction to the Bush administration's demands upon European nations for support in the coming Iraq War.<ref>Habermas, J. and Derrida, J. "February 15, Or What Binds Europeans Together: A Plea for a Common Foreign Policy, beginning in the Core of Europe" in ''The Derrida-Habermas Reader'', ed. Thomassen (2006), pp. 270&ndash;277. P. 302.</ref> Habermas has offered further context for this declaration in an interview.{{Citation needed|reason=Please provide or specify the interview|date=December 2018}}

=== Religious dialogue ===
Habermas's attitudes toward religion have changed throughout the years. Analyst Phillippe Portier identifies three phases in Habermas's attitude towards this social sphere: the first, in the decade of 1980, when the younger Jürgen, in the spirit of Marx, argued against religion seeing it as an "alienating reality" and "control tool"; the second phase, from the mid-1980s to the beginning of the 21st Century, when he stopped discussing it and, as a secular commentator, relegated it to matters of private life; and the third, from then until now, when Habermas has recognized the positive social role of religion.<ref>Sánchez, Rosalía. 2011. ''[http://www.elmundo.es/elmundo/2011/10/07/cultura/1317980044.html 'San' Jürgen Habermas]''. El Mundo. Access date: January 10, 2015</ref>

In an interview in 1999 Habermas had stated:

{{quote|For the normative self-understanding of modernity, [[Religion:Christianity|Christianity]] has functioned as more than just a precursor or catalyst. Universalistic [[Philosophy:Egalitarianism|egalitarianism]], from which sprang the ideals of freedom and a collective life in solidarity, the autonomous conduct of life and emancipation, the individual morality of conscience, human rights and democracy, is the direct legacy of the Judaic ethic of justice and the Christian ethic of love. This legacy, substantially unchanged, has been the object of a continual critical reappropriation and reinterpretation. Up to this very day there is no alternative to it. And in light of the current challenges of a post-national constellation, we must draw sustenance now, as in the past, from this substance. Everything else is idle postmodern talk.<ref>Habermas, Jurgen, ''Religion and Rationality: Essays on Reason, God, and Modernity'', ed. Eduardo Mendieta, MIT Press, 2002, p. 149. And Habermas, Jurgen, ''Time of Transitions'', Polity Press, 2006, pp. 150&ndash;151.</ref><ref>[http://www.firstprinciplesjournal.com/articles.aspx?article=1342&theme=home&page=4&loc=b&type=ctbf ''First Principles Journal&ndash; Recovering the Western Soul'', Wilfred M. McClay] (from IR 42:1, Spring 2007) &ndash; 01/01/09. Accessed: 2 December 2012.</ref><ref>[https://books.google.com/booksid=YRthfWwOoJMC&pg=PA48 ''Secularization and Cultural Criticism: Religion, Nation, and Modernity'', Vincent P. Pecora.].</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://habermas-rawls.blogspot.fi/2009/06/misquote-about-habermas-and.html|title=A misquote about Habermas and Christianity|author=|date=2009-06-08|website=habermas-rawls.blogspot.fi|accessdate=28 October 2017}}</ref>}}

The original German (from the Habermas Forum website) of the disputed quotation is:

{{quote|''Das Christentum ist für das normative Selbstverständnis der Moderne nicht nur eine Vorläufergestalt oder ein Katalysator gewesen. Der egalitäre Universalismus, aus dem die Ideen von Freiheit und solidarischem Zusammenleben, von autonomer Lebensführung und Emanzipation, von individueller Gewissensmoral, Menschenrechten und Demokratie entsprungen sind, ist unmittelbar ein Erbe der jüdischen Gerechtigkeits- und der christlichen Liebesethik. In der Substanz unverändert, ist dieses Erbe immer wieder kritisch angeeignet und neu interpretiert worden. Dazu gibt es bis heute keine Alternative. Auch angesichts der aktuellen Herausforderungen einer postnationalen Konstellation zehren wir nach wie vor von dieser Substanz. Alles andere ist postmodernes Gerede.''|author=Jürgen Habermas|source=''Zeit der Übergänge'' (2001), p.&nbsp;174f.}}

This statement has been misquoted in a number of articles and books, where Habermas instead is quoted for saying:

{{quote|Christianity, and nothing else, is the ultimate foundation of liberty, conscience, human rights, and democracy, the benchmarks of Western civilization. To this day, we have no other options. We continue to nourish ourselves from this source. Everything else is postmodern chatter.<ref>Ambrose Ih-Ren Mong. ''Dialogue Derailed: Joseph Ratzinger's War against Pluralist Theology''. Wipf and Stock Publishers. p. 279</ref>}}

In his book ''Zwischen Naturalismus und Religion'' (Between Naturalism and Religion, 2005), Habermas stated that the forces of religious strength, as a result of multiculturalism and immigration, are stronger than in previous decades, and, therefore, there is a need of tolerance which must be understood as a two-way street: secular people need to tolerate the role of religious people in the public square and vice versa.<ref>[http://www.resetdoc.org/EN/Habermas-Istanbul.php A “post-secular” society – what does that mean?] {{Webarchive |url= https://web.archive.org/web/20090329090452/http://www.resetdoc.org/EN/Habermas-Istanbul.php |date= 2009-03-29 }} by Jurgen Habermas, June 2008.</ref><ref>{{cite web |first= Javier |last=Espinosa |url= http://www.uclm.es/actividades0304/seminarios/spinoza/pdf/cuadernos/22.pdf |title=The religion in the public sphere. Habermas, Toland and Spinoza |archiveurl= https://web.archive.org/web/20160108181837/http://www.uclm.es/actividades0304/seminarios/spinoza/pdf/cuadernos/22.pdf |archivedate=2016-01-08 |publisher=Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha}}</ref>

In early 2007, Ignatius Press published a dialogue between Habermas and the then Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith of the Holy Office Joseph Ratzinger (elected as [[Biography:Pope Benedict XVI|Pope Benedict XVI]] in 2005), entitled ''The Dialectics of Secularization''. The dialogue took place on January 14, 2004 after an invitation to both thinkers by the Catholic Academy of Bavaria in Munich.<ref>{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/?id=ERzoAPsS9usC&lpg=PA7&dq=the+Dialectics+of+Secularization&pg=PP1#v=onepage&q=the+Dialectics+of+Secularization&f=false|title=Dialectics of Secularization: On Reason and Religion|first1=Benedikt XVI|last1=(Papst)|first2=Jürgen|last2=Habermas|date=28 October 2017|publisher=Ignatius Press|accessdate=28 October 2017|via=Google Books|isbn=9781586171667}}</ref> It addressed contemporary questions such as:
* Is a public culture of [[Philosophy:Reason|reason]] and ordered [[Philosophy:Liberty|liberty]] possible in our post-metaphysical age?
* Is philosophy permanently cut adrift from its grounding in [[Philosophy:Being|being]] and [[Social:Anthropology|anthropology]]?
* Does this decline of rationality signal an opportunity or a deep crisis for [[Religion:Religion|religion]] itself?

In this debate a shift of Habermas became evident—in particular, his rethinking of the public role of religion. Habermas stated that he wrote as a "methodological atheist," which means that when doing philosophy or social science, he presumed nothing about particular religious beliefs. Yet while writing from this perspective his evolving position towards the role of religion in society led him to some challenging questions, and as a result conceding some ground in his dialogue with the future Pope, that would seem to have consequences which further complicated the positions he holds about a communicative rational solution to the problems of modernity. Habermas believes that even for self-identified [[Philosophy:Liberalism|liberal]] thinkers, "to exclude religious voices from the public square is highly [[Social:Illiberal democracy|illiberal]]."<ref>Pearson, Rodney. 2014. ''[http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2014/12/tis_the_season_to_reveal_what_atheists_really_want.html#ixzz3OPTyHKel ’Tis the Season to Reveal What Atheists Really Want]''. American Thinker. Access date: January 10, 2015</ref>

Though, in the first period of his career, he began as a skeptic of any social usefulness of religion, he now believes there is a social role and utilitarian [[Social:Moral|moral]] strength in religion, and notably, that there is a necessity of Judeochristian ethics in culture.<ref>Forum Libertas. 2006. ''[http://www.forumlibertas.com/frontend/forumlibertas/noticia.php?id_noticia=6908 Jürgen Habermas, pensador icono de la izquierda, reivindica el valor de la religión]''.</ref>

In addition, Habermas has popularized the concept of "[[Philosophy:Postsecularism|post-secular]]" society, to refer to current times in which the idea of modernity is perceived as unsuccessful and at times, morally failed, so that, rather than a stratification or separation, a new peaceful dialogue and coexistence between faith and reason must be sought in order to learn mutually.<ref>Buston, Fernando del. 2014. ''El Estado debe proteger a la religión''. El Comercio. Date access January 10, 2015: "Jürgen Habermas ha acuñado el término de postsecularidad.Se da por fallida la idea central de la modernidad de que la religión iba a desaparecer y se establece una nueva relación entre razón y religión. Habermas plantea que es necesario emprender un aprendizaje mutuo entre las sociedades modernas y las creencias, o entre razón secular y fe. Se inicia una nueva época de mutuas tolerancias. La razón no puede echar por la borda el potencial de sentido de las religiones y éstas deben traducir sus contenidos racionalmente."</ref>

===Socialist dialogue===
Habermas has sided with other 20th-century commentators on Marx such as [[Biography:Hannah Arendt|Hannah Arendt]] who have indicated concerns with the limits of totalitarian perspectives often associated with Marx's apparent over-estimation of the emancipatory potential of the forces of production. Arendt had presented this in her book ''The Origins of Totalitarianism'' and Habermas extends this critique in his writings on functional reductionism in the life-world in his ''Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason''. As Habermas states:

{{blockquote | …traditional Marxist analysis… today, when we use the means of the critique of political economy… can no longer make clear predictions: for that, one would still have to assume the autonomy of a self-reproducing economic system. I do not believe in such an autonomy. Precisely for this reason, the laws governing the economic system are no longer identical to the ones Marx analyzed. Of course, this does not mean that it would be wrong to analyze the mechanism which drives the economic system; but in order for the orthodox version of such an analysis to be valid, the influence of the political system would have to be ignored.<ref name="Habermas, Jurgen 1981" />}}

==Awards==
* 1974: Hegel Prize.
* 1976: Sigmund Freud Prize.
* 1980: Theodor W. Adorno Award.
* 1985: Geschwister-Scholl-Preis for his work, ''Die neue Unübersichtlichkeit''.
* 1986: Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Prize.
* 1987: The Sonning Prize awarded biennially for outstanding contributions to European culture
* 1995: Karl Jaspers Prize.
* 1999: Theodor Heuss Prize.
* 2001: Peace Prize of the German Book Trade.
* 2003: The Prince of Asturias Foundation in Social Sciences.
* 2004: Kyoto Prize in Arts and Philosophy (50 million Yen).
* 2005: Holberg International Memorial Prize of the Norwegian Ludvig Holberg Memorial Fund (520,000 Euro).
* 2006: Bruno Kreisky Award
* 2008: European Prize of Political Culture (Hans Ringier Foundation) at the Locarno Film Festival (50,000 Euro).
* 2010: Ulysses Medal, University College Dublin.
* 2011: [http://www.viktorfrankl.org/e/vf_announcement.html Viktor Frankl Award]
* 2012: [http://www.spd-hessen.de/html/25568/welcome/Georg-August-Zinn-Preis.html Georg-August-Zinn-Prize]
* 2012: Heinrich Heine Prize
* 2012: The Munich Culture Award
* 2013: Erasmus Prize.<ref>{{cite web|author= |url=https://www.knaw.nl/nl/actueel/agenda/the-future-of-democracy-with-jurgen-habermas |title=The future of democracy, with Jürgen Habermas |publisher=KNAW |date= |accessdate=6 November 2013}}</ref>
* 2015: Kluge Prize

==Major works==
{{Main|Philosophy:Jürgen Habermas bibliography}}
* ''The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere'' (1962) {{ISBN|0-262-58108-6}}
* ''Theory and Practice'' (1963)
* ''On the Logic of the Social Sciences'' (1967)
* ''Toward a Rational Society'' (1967)
* ''Technology and Science as Ideology'' (1968)
* ''Knowledge and Human Interests'' (1971, German 1968)
* ''Legitimation Crisis'' (1975)
* ''Communication and the Evolution of Society'' (1976)
* ''On the Pragmatics of Social Interaction'' (1976)
* ''The Theory of Communicative Action'' (1981)
* ''Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action'' (1983)
* ''Philosophical-Political Profiles'' (1983)
* ''[[Philosophy:The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity|The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity]]'' (1985)
* ''The New Conservatism'' (1985)
* ''The New Obscurity: The Crisis of the Welfare State'' (1986)
* ''Postmetaphysical Thinking'' (1988)
* ''Justification and Application'' (1991)
* ''Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy'' (1992)
* ''On the Pragmatics of Communication'' (1992)
* ''The Inclusion of the Other'' (1996)
* ''A Berlin Republic'' (1997, collection of interviews with Habermas)
* ''The Postnational Constellation'' (1998)
* ''Religion and Rationality: Essays on Reason, God, and Modernity'' (1998)
* ''Truth and Justification'' (1998)
* ''The Future of Human Nature'' (2003) {{ISBN|0-7456-2986-5}}
* ''Old Europe, New Europe, Core Europe'' (2005) {{ISBN|1-84467-018-X}}
* ''The Divided West'' (2006)
* ''The Dialectics of Secularization'' (2007, w/ Joseph Ratzinger)
* ''Between Naturalism and Religion: Philosophical Essays'' (2008)
* ''Europe. The Faltering Project'' (2009)
* ''The Crisis of the European Union'' (2012)
* ''This Too a History of Philosophy'' (2019)

==See also==

* The 2005 Global Intellectuals Poll
* ''Constellations''
* [[Philosophy:Foucault–Habermas debate|Foucault–Habermas debate]]
* [[Philosophy:Positivism dispute|Positivism dispute]]

==References==
{{reflist|30em}}

==Further reading==
* Gregg Daniel Miller, ''Mimesis and Reason: Habermas's Political Philosophy''. SUNY Press, 2011.
: {{smaller|A recent analysis which underscores the aesthetic power of intersubjective communication in Habermas's theory of communicative action.}}
* ''Jürgen Habermas: a philosophical—political profile'' by Marvin Rintala, Perspectives on Political Science, 2002-01-01
* ''Jürgen Habermas'' by [https://web.archive.org/web/20100611020903/http://www.lincolncenter.asu.edu/people_professor_matustik Martin Matuštík] (2001) {{ISBN|0-7425-0796-3}}
* Postnational identity: critical theory and existential philosophy in Habermas, Kierkegaard, and Havel by Martin Matuštík (1993) {{ISBN|0-89862-420-7}}
* [[Biography:Thomas A. McCarthy|Thomas McCarthy]], ''The Critical Theory of Jürgen Habermas'', MIT Press, 1978.
: {{smaller|A highly regarded interpretation in English of Habermas's earlier work, written just as Habermas was developing his full-fledged communication theory.}}
* [[Biography:Raymond Geuss|Raymond Geuss]], ''The Idea of a Critical Theory'', Cambridge University Press, 1981.
: {{smaller|A clear account of Habermas' early philosophical views.}}
* J.G. Finlayson, ''Habermas: A Very Short Introduction'', Oxford University Press, 2004.
: {{smaller|A recent, brief introduction to Habermas, focusing on his communication theory of society.}}
* Jane Braaten, [https://books.google.com/print?id=rxlg75uJrCMC ''Habermas's Critical Theory of Society''], State University of New York Press, 1991. {{ISBN|0-7914-0759-4}}
* Thomas Kupka, [https://www.jstor.org/stable/23999017?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents Jürgen Habermas' diskurstheoretische Reformulierung des klassischen Vernunftrechts], ''Kritische Justiz'' 27 (1994), pp.&nbsp;461–469
: {{smaller|Discussing Habermas' legal philosophy in the 1992 original German edition of ''Between Facts and Norms''.}}
* Andreas Dorschel: 'Handlungstypen und Kriterien. Zu Habermas' ''Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns''', in: ''Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung'' 44 (1990), nr. 2, pp. 220-252. A critical discussion of types of action in Habermas. In German.
* Erik Oddvar Eriksen and Jarle Weigard, ''Understanding Habermas: Communicative Action and Deliberative Democracy'', Continuum International Publishing, 2004 ({{ISBN|082647179X}}).
: {{smaller|A recent and comprehensive introduction to Habermas' mature theory and its political implications both national and global.}}
* Detlef Horster. ''Habermas: An Introduction''. Pennbridge, 1992 ({{ISBN|1-880055-01-5}})
* Martin Jay, ''Marxism and Totality: The Adventures of a Concept from Lukacs to Habermas'' (Chapter 9), University of California Press, 1986. ({{ISBN|0-520-05742-2}})
* Ernst Piper (ed.) ''"Historikerstreit": Die Dokumentation der Kontroverse um die Einzigartigkeit der nationalsozialistschen Judenvernichtung'', Munich: Piper, 1987, translated into English by James Knowlton and Truett Cates as ''Forever In The Shadow Of Hitler?: Original Documents Of the Historikerstreit, The Controversy Concerning The Singularity Of The Holocaust'', Atlantic Highlands, N.J.: Humanities Press, 1993 ({{ISBN|0391037846}}) {{smaller|Contains Habermas's essays from the ''Historikerstreit'' and the reactions of various scholars to his statements.}}
* Edgar, Andrew. ''The Philosophy of Habermas''. Мontreal, McGill-Queen's UP, 2005.
* Adams, Nicholas. ''Habermas & Theology''. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2006.
* Mike Sandbothe, ''Habermas, Pragmatism, and the Media'', Online publication: sandbothe.net 2008; German original in: Über Habermas. Gespräche mit Zeitgenossen, ed. by Michael Funken, Darmstadt: Primus, 2008.
* Müller-Doohm, Stefan. ''Jürgen Habermas''. Frankfurt, Suhrkamp, 2008 (Suhrkamp BasisBiographie, 38).
* ''Moderne Religion? Theologische und religionsphilosophische Reaktionen auf Jürgen Habermas''. Hrsg. v. Knut Wenzel und Thomas M. Schmidt. Freiburg, Herder, 2009.
* Luca Corchia, ''[https://books.google.com/books?id=-T14AQAAQBAJ&hl=it&source=gbs_navlinks_s Jürgen Habermas. A bibliography: works and studies (1952-2013): With an Introduction by Stefan Müller-Doohm]'', Arnus Edizioni - Il Campano, Pisa, 2013.
*{{cite book |last=Corchia  |first=Luca  |title=Jürgen Habermas. A Bibliography. 1. Works of Jürgen Habermas (1952-2018)|year=April 2018 |publisher=Department of Political Science, University of Pisa (Italy), 156 pp |url=https://www.academia.edu/38973021|ref=harv}}.
*{{cite book |last=Corchia  |first=Luca  |title=Jürgen Habermas. A bibliography. 2. Studies on Jürgen Habermas (1962-2015) |year=February 2016  |publisher=Department of Political Science, University of Pisa (Italy), 468 pp |url=https://www.academia.edu/22537303|ref=harv}}.
*Peter Koller, Christian Hiebaum, ''Jürgen Habermas: Faktizität und Geltung'', Walter de Gruyter	2016.

==External links==
* [http://www.iep.utm.edu/habermas/ Extensive article] in the [[Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy]]
* [http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/habermas/ Extensive article] in the [[Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy]]
* [http://www.signandsight.com/features/676.html ''Towards a United States of Europe''], by Jürgen Habermas, at signandsight.com, published March 27, 2006
* [http://www.signandsight.com/features/1349.html ''How to save the quality press?''] Habermas argues for state support for quality newspapers, at signandsight.com, published May 21, 2007
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20110618001410/http://www.helsinki.fi/~amkauppi/hablinks.html Habermas links collected by Antti Kauppinen (writings; interviews; bibliography; Habermas explained, discussed, reviewed; and other Habermas sites; ''updated 2004'')]
* [https://pages.gseis.ucla.edu/faculty/kellner/papers/habermas.htm Habermas, the Public Sphere, and Democracy: A Critical Intervention by Douglas Kellner]
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20070216033930/http://filer.case.edu/~ngb2/Authors/Habermas.html Jurgen Habermas, On Society and Politics]
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20080203161418/http://www.stanford.edu/dept/complit/cgi-bin/?q=node%2F222 Juergen Habermas gives Memorial Lecture] in honor of American Philosopher, [[Biography:Richard Rorty|Richard Rorty]] on November 2, 2007 5pm Cubberley Auditorium, at Stanford University. Transcript available [https://web.archive.org/web/20071104173604/http://www.telospress.com/main/index.php?main_page=news_article&article_id=204 here].
* [http://www.habermasforum.dk/ Habermas Forum] by Thomas Gregersen; updated bibliography, news and literature on Habermas
* [http://www.press.uchicago.edu/Misc/Chicago/066649.html Philosophy in a Time of Terror: Dialogues with Jürgen Habermas and Jacques Derrida]

{{s-start}}
{{s-ach|aw}}
{{s-bef|before=[[Biography:Norbert Elias|Norbert Elias]]}}
{{s-ttl|title=Theodor W. Adorno Award|years=1980}}
{{s-aft|after=[[Biography:Günther Anders|Günther Anders]]}}
{{s-bef|before=William Heinesen}}
{{s-ttl|title=Sonning Prize|years=1987}}
{{s-aft|after=Ingmar Bergman}}
{{s-bef|before=Anthony Giddens}}
{{s-ttl|title=Princess of Asturias Award<br />for Social Sciences|years=2003}}
{{s-aft|after=[[Biography:Paul Krugman|Paul Krugman]]}}
{{s-bef|before=Tamao Yoshida}}
{{s-ttl|title=Kyoto Prize in Arts and Philosophy|years=2004}}
{{s-aft|after=Nikolaus Harnoncourt}}
{{s-bef|before=[[Biography:Julia Kristeva|Julia Kristeva]]}}
{{s-ttl|title=Holberg Prize|years=2005}}
{{s-aft|after=Shmuel Eisenstadt}}
{{s-bef|before=[[Biography:Daniel Dennett|Daniel Dennett]]}}
{{s-ttl|title=Erasmus Prize|years=2013}}
{{s-aft|after=Frie Leysen}}
{{s-bef|before=Fernando Henrique Cardoso}}
{{s-ttl|title=Kluge Prize|years=2015|with=[[Biography:Charles Taylor (philosopher)|Charles Taylor]]}}
{{s-aft|after=Drew Gilpin Faust}}
{{s-end}}

{{continental philosophy}}
{{philosophy of science}}
{{Social and political philosophy}}
{{Jurisprudence}}
{{Critical theory}}
{{Kyoto Prize in Arts and Philosophy - Thought and Ethics}}


{{DEFAULTSORT:Habermas, Jurgen}}
[[Category:Atheist philosophers]]
[[Category:Communication theorists]]
[[Category:Contemporary philosophers]]
[[Category:Continental philosophers]]
[[Category:Cultural critics]]
[[Category:Epistemologists]]
[[Category:Metaphysicians]]
[[Category:Ontologists]]
[[Category:Philosophers of culture]]
[[Category:Philosophers of ethics and morality]]
[[Category:Philosophers of language]]
[[Category:Philosophers of logic]]
[[Category:Philosophers of mind]]
[[Category:Philosophers of science]]
[[Category:Philosophers of social science]]
[[Category:Political philosophers]]
[[Category:Rationality theorists]]
[[Category:Social critics]]
[[Category:Social philosophers]]
[[Category:Social philosophy]]

{{Sourceattribution|Jürgen Habermas|1}}