View source for Finance:Electric car EPA fuel economy

<onlyinclude>The following table compares official EPA ratings for fuel economy ([[Physics:Miles per gallon gasoline equivalent|miles per gallon gasoline equivalent]], mpg-e, for [[Engineering:Plug-in electric vehicle|plug-in electric vehicle]]s) for series production all-electric passenger vehicles rated by the EPA {{as of|2016|11|lc=y}},<ref name=EPA2016MY/><ref name=EPA2017MY>{{cite web |url=https://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/pdfs/guides/FEG2017.pdf |title=Model Year 2017 Fuel Economy Guide - Electric vehicles & Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles |website=fueleconomy.gov |author=United States Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. Department of Energy |date=2016-11-16|accessdate=2016-11-19}} ''pp. 32–36''.</ref> versus EPA rated most fuel economic [[Engineering:Plug-in hybrid|plug-in hybrid]] with long distance range ([[Engineering:Chevrolet Volt (second generation)|Chevrolet Volt{{snd}} second generation]]), [[Engineering:Hybrid electric vehicle|gasoline-electric hybrid car]] ([[Engineering:Toyota Prius#Fourth generation (XW50; 2015)|Toyota Prius Eco - fourth generation]]),<ref name=EPAtopten>{{cite web|url=http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/topten.jsp|title=Fueleconomy.gov's Top Fuel Sippers (EPA Ratings, All Years)|publisher=fueleconomy.gov|author=U. S. Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. Department of Energy|date=2015-12-04|accessdate=2015-12-06}} ''Excludes all-electric vehicles. Click on the tab "Top Fuel Sippers (EPA Ratings, All Years)" - The 2016&nbsp;Volt has a combined fuel economy of 77&nbsp;mpg-e. The BMW i3 REx has a combined fuel economy of 88&nbsp;mpg-e, and ranks as the most efficient EPA-certified current year vehicle with a gasoline engine.''</ref><ref name=EPA2016Prius>{{cite web|url=http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/Find.do?action=sbs&id=35556&id=37163&id=37164|title=Compare Side-by-Side - 2015 Toyota Prius, 2016 Toyota Prius and 2016 Toyota Prius Eco|publisher=Fueleconomy.gov|author=U. S. Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. Department of Energy|date=2015-12-18|accessdate=2015-12-18}} ''The average 2016 vehicle gets 25&nbsp;mpg.''</ref><ref name=EPA2016Best>{{cite web|url=http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/best-worst.shtml|title=2016 Best and Worst Fuel Economy Vehicles - (excluding electric vehicles)|publisher=Fueleconomy.gov|author=U. S. Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. Department of Energy|date=2015-08-14|accessdate=2015-08-17}} ''See the tab "Cars excl. EVs" – The Prius c is the most fuel efficient in the compact class and the conventional Prius is the most fuel efficient in the midsize class, and both rank ahead of the most fuel efficient in any other clars.''</ref> and EPA's average new 2016 vehicle, which has a fuel economy of {{convert|25|mpgus|abbr=on}}.<ref name=EPA2016MY>{{cite web|url=https://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/pdfs/guides/FEG2016.pdf|title=Model Year 2016 Fuel Economy Guide - Electric vehicles & Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles |website=fueleconomy.gov |author=United States Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. Department of Energy|date=2015-12-18|accessdate=2015-12-18}} ''See pp. 27–28 for all-electric vehicles and pp. 30–31 for plug-in hybrid electric vehicles. The average 2016 vehicle gets 25&nbsp;mpg''</ref><ref name=EPAtopten/> Manufacturers test their own vehicles—usually pre-production prototypes—and report the results to EPA. EPA reviews the results and confirms about 15%–20% of them through their own tests at the National Vehicles and Fuel Emissions Laboratory.<ref name=manufacturer_test>{{cite web|url=https://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/how_tested.shtml|title=How Vehicles Are Tested |website=www.fueleconomy.gov |author=United States Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. Department of Energy}}</ref>
{| class="wikitable sortable" style="margin: 1em auto 1em auto"
! colspan="8" style="text-align:center; background:#cfc;"| {{align|right|{{smaller|[{{edit|Electric car operating cost}}]}}}} Comparison of fuel economy for all the electric cars rated by the EPA for the U.S. market {{as of|2016|11|lc=y}}<br>against EPA rated most fuel economic plug-in hybrid, hybrid electric vehicle and 2016 average gasoline-powered car in the U.S. <br><small>(Fuel economy as displayed in the Monroney label)<ref name=EPA2016MY/><ref name=EPA2017MY/><ref name=EPA2015MY>{{cite web|url=https://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/pdfs/guides/FEG2015.pdf|title=Model Year 2015 Fuel Economy Guide - Electric vehicles & Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles |website=fueleconomy.gov |author=United States Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. Department of Energy|date=2015-08-12|accessdate=2015-08-17}} ''pp. 31–34''.</ref></small>
|-
!! style="background-color:#cfc;" | Vehicle
!! style="background-color:#cfc;" | Model<br>year
!! style="background-color:#cfc;" data-sort-type="number" | EPA rated<br>Combined <br>fuel economy
!! style="background-color:#cfc;" data-sort-type="number" | EPA rated<br> City <br>fuel economy
!! style="background-color:#cfc;" data-sort-type="number" | EPA rated<br> Highway<br>fuel economy
!! style="background:#cfc;" | Notes
|-
|[[Engineering:Tesla Model 3|Tesla model 3 standard range]]<ref>{{Cite web|title=2020 Tesla Model 3 Standard Range Plus|url=https://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/Find.do?action=sbs&id=42278|access-date=2020-12-05|website=www.fueleconomy.gov}}</ref>
|2020
|141&nbsp;mpg-e<br>(24&nbsp;kW·h/100&nbsp;mi<br>(15&nbsp;kW·h/100&nbsp;km)
|148&nbsp;mpg-e<br>      (22.9&nbsp;kW·h/100&nbsp;mi <br>      {{convert|148|mpge|kWh/100 km|disp=out|abbr=}})
|132 mpg-e<br>       (25.6&nbsp;kW·h/100&nbsp;mi<br>      {{convert|132|mpge|kWh/100 km|disp=out|abbr=}})
|(1)
|- style="text-align:center;"
| style="text-align:left;" |Hyundai Ioniq Electric<ref name=EPA2017MY/><ref name=EPAIoniqEV>{{cite web |url=http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/Find.do?action=sbs&id=38431 |title=Compare Side-by-Side: 2017 Hyundai Ioniq Electric |website=fueleconomy.gov |author=United States Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. Department of Energy |date=2016-11-18 |accessdate=2016-11-19}}</ref> || 2017 || 136&nbsp;mpg-e<br>(25&nbsp;kW·h/100&nbsp;mi<br>{{convert|136|mpge|kWh/100 km|disp=out}})|| 150&nbsp;mpg-e<br>(22&nbsp;kW·h/100&nbsp;mi <br>{{convert|150|mpge|kWh/100 km|disp=out}}) ||122 mpg-e<br>(28&nbsp;kW·h/100&nbsp;mi<br>{{convert|122|mpge|kWh/100 km|disp=out}}) || style="text-align:left;" | (1) (4) 

|- style="text-align:center;"
| style="text-align:left;" |[[Engineering:BMW i3|BMW i3]] (60 [[Ampere hour|A·h]])<ref name=EPAi3A94/><ref name=EPAi3BEV>{{cite web|url=http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/Find.do?action=sbs&id=35207|title=Compare Side-by-Side: 2014 BMW i3 BEV|website=fueleconomy.gov |author=United States Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. Department of Energy|date=2015-12-04 |accessdate=2015-12-06}}</ref> || 2014/15/16 ||124&nbsp;mpg-e<br>(27&nbsp;kW·h/100&nbsp;mi<br>{{convert|124|mpge|kWh/100 km|disp=out}})||137&nbsp;mpg-e<br>(25&nbsp;kW·h/100&nbsp;mi <br>{{convert|137|mpge|kWh/100 km|disp=out}}) ||111 mpg-e<br>(30&nbsp;kW·h/100&nbsp;mi<br>{{convert|111|mpge|kWh/100 km|disp=out}}) || style="text-align:left;" | (1) (3) (4) (5)

|- style="text-align:center;"
| style="text-align:left;" |Scion iQ EV<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/Find.do?action=sbs&id=33307|title=2013 Scion iQ EV|publisher=Fueleconomy.gov|author=U. S. Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. Department of Energy|date=2015-12-04 |accessdate=2015-12-06}}</ref>|| 2013||121&nbsp;mpg-e<br>(28&nbsp;kW·h/100&nbsp;mi<br>{{convert|121|mpge|kWh/100 km|disp=out}})||138&nbsp;mpg-e<br>(24&nbsp;kW·h/100&nbsp;mi<br>{{convert|138|mpge|kWh/100 km|disp=out}}) ||105&nbsp;mpg-e<br>(32&nbsp;kW·h/100&nbsp;mi<br>{{convert|105|mpge|kWh/100 km|disp=out}}) || style="text-align:left;" |(1)

|- style="text-align:center;"

| align=left|Chevrolet Bolt EV<ref name=EPABolt2017>{{cite web |url=http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/Find.do?action=sbs&id=38187 |title= Compare Side-by-Syde - 2017 Chevrolet Bolt |publisher=fueleconomy.gov |author=Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy, U.S. Department of Energy and U. S. Environmental Protection Agency and | date=2016-09-20 |accessdate=2016-09-20}}</ref> || 2017 ||119&nbsp;mpg-e<br>(28&nbsp;kW-h/100&nbsp;mi<br>{{convert|121|mpge|kWh/100 km|disp=out}})||128 mpg-e <br>({{convert|128|mpge|kWh/100 km|disp=out}})|| 110 mpg-e <br>({{convert|110|mpge|kWh/100 km|disp=out}}) ||

|- style="text-align:center;"
| style="text-align:left;" |[[Engineering:Chevrolet Spark EV|Chevrolet Spark EV]]<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/Find.do?action=sbs&id=33640|title=2014 Chvevrolet Spark EV|publisher=Fueleconomy.gov|author=U. S. Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. Department of Energy|date=2015-12-04 |accessdate=2015-12-06}}</ref>|| 2014/15/16 ||119 mpg-e<br>(28&nbsp;kW·h/100&nbsp;mi<br>{{convert|119|mpge|kWh/100&nbsp;km|disp=out}})||128 mpg-e<br>(26&nbsp;kW·h/100&nbsp;mi<br>{{convert|128|mpge|kWh/100 km|disp=out}}) ||109 mpg-e<br>(31&nbsp;kW·h/100&nbsp;mi<br>{{convert|109|mpge|kWh/100 km|disp=out}}) || style="text-align:left;" | (1)

|- style="text-align:center;"
| style="text-align:left;" |[[Engineering:BMW i3|BMW i3]] (94 [[Ampere hour|A·h]])<ref name=EPAi3A94>{{cite web |url=http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/Find.do?action=sbs&id=36030&id=37222&id=38229&id=38001 |title=Compare Side-by-Side: 2015 BMW i3 REX, 2016 BMW i3 REX, 2017 BMW i3 REX (94 Amp-hour battery), and 2017 BMW i3 BEV (94 Amp-hour battery)|website=fueleconomy.gov |author=United States Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. Department of Energy |date=2016-09-29 |accessdate=2016-09-30}}</ref> ||  2017 || 118 mpg-e<br>(29&nbsp;kW·h/100&nbsp;mi<br>{{convert|118|mpge|kWh/100 km|disp=out}})|| 129 mpg-e <br>({{convert|129|mpge|kWh/100 km|disp=out}})|| 106 mpg-e <br>({{convert|106|mpge|kWh/100 km|disp=out}}) || style="text-align:left;" | (1)

|- style="text-align:center;"
| style="text-align:left;" |Honda Fit EV<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/Find.do?action=sbs&id=33265|title=2013 Honda Fit EV|publisher=Fueleconomy.gov|author=U. S. Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. Department of Energy|date=2015-12-04|accessdate=2015-12-06}}</ref>|| 2013/14 ||118 mpg-e<br>(29&nbsp;kW·h/100&nbsp;mi<br>{{convert|118|mpge|kWh/100 km|disp=out}})||132 mpg-e<br>(26&nbsp;kW·h/100&nbsp;mi<br>{{convert|132|mpge|kWh/100 km|disp=out}}) ||105 mpg-e<br>(32&nbsp;kW·h/100&nbsp;mi<br>{{convert|105|mpge|kWh/100 km|disp=out}}) || style="text-align:left;" | (1)
|- style="text-align:center;"
| style="text-align:left;" |Fiat 500e<ref name=EPA500e>{{cite web|url=http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/Find.do?action=sbs&id=33396|title=2013 Fiat 500e|publisher=Fueleconomy.gov|author=U. S. Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. Department of Energy|date=2015-12-04|accessdate=2015-12-06}}</ref>|| 2013/14/15 ||116 mpg-e<br>(29&nbsp;kW·h/100&nbsp;mi<br>{{convert|116|mpge|kWh/100 km|disp=out}})||122 mpg-e<br>(28&nbsp;kW·h/100&nbsp;mi<br>{{convert|122|mpge|kWh/100 km|disp=out}}) ||108 mpg-e<br>(31&nbsp;kW·h/100&nbsp;mi<br>{{convert|108|mpge|kWh/100 km|disp=out}}) || style="text-align:left;" | (1)
|- style="text-align:center;"
| style="text-align:left;" |Volkswagen e-Golf<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/Find.do?action=sbs&id=35849|title=2015 Volkswagen e-Golf|publisher=Fueleconomy.gov|author=U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. Department of Energy|date=2015-12-04|accessdate=2015-12-06}}</ref>|| 2015/16||116 mpg-e<br>(29&nbsp;kW·h/100&nbsp;mi<br>{{convert|116|mpge|kWh/100 km|disp=out}})|| {{convert|126|mpge|kWh/100 mi+kWh/100 km|abbr=on|disp=br()}} || {{convert|105|mpge|kWh/100 mi+kWh/100 km|abbr=on|disp=br()}} || style="text-align:left;" | (1)
|- style="text-align:center;"
| style="text-align:left;" |[[Engineering:Nissan Leaf|Nissan Leaf]] (24&nbsp;kW-h)<ref name=Leaf2013_16>{{cite web|url=http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/Find.do?action=sbs&id=37066&id=37067&id=34918&id=34699|title=Compare side by side: 2013 Nissan Leaf/2014 Nissan Leaf/2015 Nissan Leaf/2016 Nissan Leaf (24&nbsp;kW-hr battery pack)/2016 Nissan Leaf (30&nbsp;kW-hr battery pack)|publisher=Fueleconomy.gov|author=U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. Department of Energy|date=2015-12-04|accessdate=2015-12-06}}</ref>|| 2013/14/15/16 ||114 mpg-e<br>(30&nbsp;kW·h/100&nbsp;mi;<br>{{convert|114|mpge|kWh/100 km|disp=out}})||126 mpg-e<br>(27&nbsp;kW·h/100&nbsp;mi;<br>{{convert|126|mpge|kWh/100 km|disp=out}}) || 101 mpg-e<br>(33&nbsp;kW·h/100&nbsp;mi;<br>{{convert|101|mpge|kWh/100 km|disp=out}}) || style="text-align:left;" |(1) (6)
|- style="text-align:center;"
| style="text-align:left;" |[[Engineering:Mitsubishi i-MiEV|Mitsubishi i]]<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/evsbs.shtml|title=2011–12 Electric Vehicles- 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV|publisher=Fueleconomy.gov|author=U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. Department of Energy|date= 2015-12-04|accessdate=2015-12-06}}</ref> || 2012/13/14/16 ||112 mpg-e<br>(30&nbsp;kW·h/100&nbsp;mi;<br>{{convert|112|mpge|kWh/100 km|disp=out}})||126 mpg-e<br>(27&nbsp;kW·h/100&nbsp;mi;<br>{{convert|126|mpge|kWh/100 km|disp=out}}) || 99 mpg-e<br>(34&nbsp;kW·h/100&nbsp;mi;<br>{{convert|99|mpge|kWh/100 km|disp=out}}) || style="text-align:left;" | (1)
|- style="text-align:center;"
| style="text-align:left;" |[[Engineering:Nissan Leaf|Nissan Leaf]] (30&nbsp;kW-h)<ref name=Leaf2013_16/>|| 2016 ||112 mpg-e<br>(30&nbsp;kW·h/100&nbsp;mi;<br>{{convert|112|mpge|kWh/100 km|disp=out}})||{{convert|124|mpge|kWh/100 mi+kWh/100 km|abbr=on|disp=br()}} || {{convert|101|mpge|kWh/100 mi+kWh/100 km|abbr=on|disp=br()}} || style="text-align:left;" |(1) 
|- style="text-align:center;"
| style="text-align:left;" |Fiat 500e<ref name=EPA500e2016>{{cite web|url=http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/Find.do?action=sbs&id=37156|title=2016 Fiat 500e|publisher=Fueleconomy.gov|author=U. S. Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. Department of Energy|date=2015-12-04|accessdate=2015-12-06}}</ref>|| 2016 ||112 mpg-e<br>(30&nbsp;kW·h/100&nbsp;mi;<br>{{convert|112|mpge|kWh/100 km|disp=out}})||121 mpg-e<br>(28&nbsp;kW·h/100&nbsp;mi;<br>{{convert|121|mpge|kWh/100 km|disp=out}}) ||103 mpg-e<br>(33&nbsp;kW·h/100&nbsp;mi;<br>{{convert|103|mpge|kWh/100 km|disp=out}}) || style="text-align:left;" | (1)
|- style="text-align:center;"
| style="text-align:left;" |[[Engineering:Smart electric drive|Smart electric drive]]<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/Find.do?action=sbs&id=33306|title=2013 smart fortwo electric drive coupe|publisher=Fueleconomy.gov|author=U. S. Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. Department of Energy|date=2015-12-04|accessdate=2015-12-06}}</ref>|| 2013/14/15/16 ||107 mpg-e<br>(32&nbsp;kW·h/100&nbsp;mi;<br>{{convert|107|mpge|kWh/100 km|disp=out}})||122 mpg-e<br>(28&nbsp;kW·h/100&nbsp;mi;<br>{{convert|122|mpge|kWh/100 km|disp=out}}) ||93 mpg-e<br>(36&nbsp;kW·h/100&nbsp;mi;<br>{{convert|93|mpge|kWh/100 km|disp=out}}) || style="text-align:left;" | (1) (7)
|- style="text-align:center;"
| style="text-align:left;" |[[Engineering:Kia Soul EV|Kia Soul EV]]<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/Find.do?action=sbs&id=35601|title=2015 Kia Soul Electric|publisher=Fueleconomy.gov|author=U. S. Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. Department of Energy|date=2015-12-04|accessdate=2015-12-06}}</ref> || 2015/16 ||105 mpg-e<br>(32&nbsp;kW·h/100&nbsp;mi;<br>{{convert|105|mpge|kWh/100 km|disp=out}})|| {{convert|120|mpge|kWh/100 mi+kWh/100 km|abbr=on|disp=br()}} || {{convert|92|mpge|kWh/100 mi+kWh/100 km|abbr=on|disp=br()}} || style="text-align:left;" | (1)
|- style="text-align:center;"
| style="text-align:left;" |Ford Focus Electric<ref>{{cite web|url= http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/Find.do?action=sbs&id=32278|title=2012 Ford Focus BEV|publisher=Fueleconomy.gov|author=U. S. Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. Department of Energy|date= 2015-12-04|accessdate=2015-12-06}}</ref>|| 2012/13/14/15/16 ||105 mpg-e<br>(32&nbsp;kW·h/100&nbsp;mi;<br>{{convert|105|mpge|kWh/100 km|disp=out}})||110 mpg-e<br>(31&nbsp;kW·h/100&nbsp;mi;<br>{{convert|110|mpge|kWh/100 km|disp=out}}) || 99 mpg-e<br>(34&nbsp;kW·h/100&nbsp;mi;<br>{{convert|99|mpge|kWh/100 km|disp=out}}) || style="text-align:left;" | (1)
|- style="text-align:center;"
| style="text-align:left;" |[[Engineering:Tesla Model 3|Tesla Model 3 Standard Range Plus]]<ref name=EPA2020MYSRP>{{cite web|url=https://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/noframes/42278.shtml|title=2020 Model 3 SR+|publisher=Fueleconomy.gov|author=U. S. Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. Department of Energy|date=2020-05-10|accessdate=2020-05-10}}</ref> || 2020||141 mpg-e<br>(24&nbsp;kW·h/100&nbsp;mi;<br>{{convert|141|mpge|kWh/100 km|disp=out}})||148 mpg-e<br>(23&nbsp;kW·h/100&nbsp;mi;<br>{{convert|148|mpge|kWh/100 km|disp=out}}) || 132 mpg-e<br>(25&nbsp;kW·h/100&nbsp;mi;<br>{{convert|132|mpge|kWh/100 km|disp=out}}) || style="text-align:left;" | (1)
|- style="text-align:center;"
| style="text-align:left;" |[[Engineering:Tesla Model 3|Tesla Model 3 Long Range AWD]]<ref name=EPA2020MYLRAWD>{{cite web|url=https://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/noframes/42275.shtml|title=2020 Model 3 LR AWD|publisher=Fueleconomy.gov|author=U. S. Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. Department of Energy|date=2020-05-10|accessdate=2020-05-10}}</ref> || 2020||121 mpg-e<br>(28&nbsp;kW·h/100&nbsp;mi;<br>{{convert|121|mpge|kWh/100 km|disp=out}})||124 mpg-e<br>(27&nbsp;kW·h/100&nbsp;mi;<br>{{convert|124|mpge|kWh/100 km|disp=out}}) || 116 mpg-e<br>(29&nbsp;kW·h/100&nbsp;mi;<br>{{convert|116|mpge|kWh/100 km|disp=out}}) || style="text-align:left;" | (1)
|- style="text-align:center;"
| style="text-align:left;" |[[Engineering:Tesla Model S|Tesla Model S AWD - 70D]]<ref name=EPA2016MY/><ref name=ModelS60_70_90/> || 2015/16||101 mpg-e<br>(33&nbsp;kW·h/100&nbsp;mi;<br>{{convert|101|mpge|kWh/100 km|disp=out}})||101 mpg-e<br>(33&nbsp;kW·h/100&nbsp;mi;<br>{{convert|101|mpge|kWh/100 km|disp=out}}) || 102 mpg-e<br>(33&nbsp;kW·h/100&nbsp;mi;<br>{{convert|102|mpge|kWh/100 km|disp=out}}) || style="text-align:left;" | (1)
|- style="text-align:center;"
| style="text-align:left;" |[[Engineering:Tesla Model S|Tesla Model S AWD - 85D]]<ref name=EPA2016MY/><ref name=EPAModelS2015>{{cite web|url=http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/Find.do?action=sbs&id=35980&id=36009&id=36008&id=35994|title=2015 Tesla Model S (85&nbsp;kW-hr battery pack); 2014 Tesla Model S AWD (85&nbsp;kW-hr battery pack); 2015 Tesla Model S AWD - 85D; and 2015 Tesla Model S AWD - P85D|publisher=Fueleconomy.gov|author=U. S. Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. Department of Energy|date=2015-12-04|accessdate=2015-12-06}}</ref> || 2015/16 || 100 mpg-e<br>(34&nbsp;kW·h/100&nbsp;mi;<br>{{convert|100|mpge|kWh/100 km|disp=out}}) || 95 mpg-e<br>(35&nbsp;kW·h/100&nbsp;mi;<br>{{convert|95|mpge|kWh/100 km|disp=out}}) || {{convert|106|mpge|kWh/100 mi+kWh/100km|abbr=on|disp=br()}} || style="text-align:left;" | (1) (8)
|- style="text-align:center;"
| style="text-align:left;" |[[Engineering:Tesla Model S|Tesla Model S AWD - 90D]]<ref name=EPA2016MY/><ref name=ModelS60_70_90/> || 2015/16||100 mpg-e<br>(34&nbsp;kW·h/100&nbsp;mi;<br>{{convert|100|mpge|kWh/100 km|disp=out}})||95 mpg-e<br>(35&nbsp;kW·h/100&nbsp;mi;<br>{{convert|95|mpge|kWh/100 km|disp=out}}) || 106 mpg-e<br>(32&nbsp;kW·h/100&nbsp;mi;<br>{{convert|106|mpge|kWh/100 km|disp=out}}) || style="text-align:left;" | (1)
|- style="text-align:center;"
| style="text-align:left;" |[[Engineering:Tesla Model S|Tesla Model S (60&nbsp;kW·h)]]<ref name=EPA2016MY/><ref name=ModelS60_70_90>{{cite web|url= http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/Find.do?action=sbs&id=36017&id=36126&id=36786&id=36787|title=Compare Side-by-Side - 2015 Tesla Model S  60&nbsp;kW-hr/AWD - 70D/AWD - 90D/AWD - P90D|publisher=Fueleconomy.gov|author=U. S. Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. Department of Energy|date=2015-12-04|accessdate=2015-12-06}}</ref>|| 2014/15/16||95 mpg-e<br>(35&nbsp;kW·h/100&nbsp;mi;<br>{{convert|95|mpge|kWh/100 km|disp=out}})||94 mpg-e<br>(36&nbsp;kW·h/100&nbsp;mi;<br>{{convert|94|mpge|kWh/100 km|disp=out}}) || 97 mpg-e<br>(35&nbsp;kW·h/100&nbsp;mi;<br>{{convert|97|mpge|kWh/100 km|disp=out}}) || style="text-align:left;" | (1)
|- style="text-align:center;"
| style="text-align:left;" | [[Engineering:Tesla Model S|Tesla Model S AWD - P85D]]<ref name=EPA2016MY/><ref name=EPAModelS2015/>|| 2015/16 || 93 mpg-e<br>(36&nbsp;kW·h/100&nbsp;mi;<br>{{convert|93|mpge|kWh/100 km|disp=out}}) || 89 mpg-e<br>(38&nbsp;kW·h/100&nbsp;mi;<br>{{convert|89|mpge|kWh/100 km|disp=out}}) || {{convert|98|mpge|kWh/100 mi+kWh/100 km|abbr=on|disp=br()}} || style="text-align:left;" | (1) (8)
|- style="text-align:center;"
| style="text-align:left;" |[[Engineering:Tesla Model S|Tesla Model S AWD - P90D]]<ref name=EPA2016MY/><ref name=ModelS60_70_90/> || 2015/16||93 mpg-e<br>(36&nbsp;kW·h/100&nbsp;mi;<br>{{convert|93|mpge|kWh/100 km|disp=out}})||89 mpg-e<br>(38&nbsp;kW·h/100&nbsp;mi;<br>{{convert|89|mpge|kWh/100 km|disp=out}}) || 98 mpg-e<br>(35&nbsp;kW·h/100&nbsp;mi;<br>{{convert|98|mpge|kWh/100 km|disp=out}}) || style="text-align:left;" | (1)
|- style="text-align:center;"
| style="text-align:left;" |[[Engineering:Tesla Model X|Tesla Model X AWD – 90D]]<ref name=ModelX90EPA>{{cite web|url=http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/Find.do?action=sbs&id=36979&id=36980|title=2016 Tesla Model X AWD - 90D and P90D|author=U. S. Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. Department of Energy|date=2015-12-04|accessdate=2015-12-06}}</ref> || 2016|| 92 mpg-e<br>(34&nbsp;kW·h/100&nbsp;mi;<br>{{convert|92|mpge|kWh/100 km|disp=out}}) || 90 mpg-e<br>(37&nbsp;kW·h/100&nbsp;mi;<br>{{convert|90|mpge|kWh/100 km|disp=out}}) || 94 mpg-e<br>(32&nbsp;kW·h/100&nbsp;mi;<br>{{convert|94|mpge|kWh/100 km|disp=out}}) || style="text-align:left;" |(1)
|- style="text-align:center;"
| style="text-align:left;" |[[Engineering:Tesla Model X|Tesla Model X AWD – P90D]]<ref name=ModelX90EPA/> || 2016|| 89 mpg-e<br>(38&nbsp;kW·h/100&nbsp;mi;<br>{{convert|89|mpge|kWh/100 km|disp=out}})||89 mpg-e<br>(38&nbsp;kW·h/100&nbsp;mi;<br>{{convert|89|mpge|kWh/100 km|disp=out}}) || 90 mpg-e<br>(38&nbsp;kW·h/100&nbsp;mi;<br>{{convert|90|mpge|kWh/100 km|disp=out}}) || style="text-align:left;" |(1)
|- style="text-align:center;"
| style="text-align:left;" |[[Engineering:Tesla Model S|Tesla Model S]] (85&nbsp;kW·h)<ref>{{cite web|url= http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/Find.do?action=sbs&id=33368&id=34775&id=35980&id=35994|title=2012 Tesla Model S|publisher=Fueleconomy.gov|author=U. S. Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. Department of Energy|date=2015-12-04|accessdate=2015-12-06}}</ref> || 2012/13/14/15||89 mpg-e<br>(38&nbsp;kW·h/100&nbsp;mi;<br>{{convert|89|mpge|kWh/100 km|disp=out}})||88 mpg-e<br>(38&nbsp;kW·h/100&nbsp;mi;<br>{{convert|88|mpge|kWh/100 km|disp=out}}) || 90 mpg-e<br>(37&nbsp;kW·h/100&nbsp;mi;<br>{{convert|90|mpge|kWh/100 km|disp=out}}) || style="text-align:left;" | (1)
|- style="text-align:center;"
| style="text-align:left;" |Mercedes-Benz B-Class Electric Drive<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/Find.do?action=sbs&id=36997&id=35960&id=35247|title=2014/2015/2016 Mercedes-Benz B-Class Electric Drive|publisher=Fueleconomy.gov|author=U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. Department of Energy|date=2015-12-04|accessdate=2015-12-06}}</ref> || 2014/15/16 ||84 mpg-e<br>(40&nbsp;kW·h/100&nbsp;mi;<br>{{convert|84|mpge|kWh/100 km|disp=out}})||85 mpg-e<br>(40&nbsp;kW·h/100&nbsp;mi;<br>{{convert|85|mpge|kWh/100 km|disp=out}})|| 83 mpg-e<br>(41&nbsp;kW·h/100&nbsp;mi;<br>{{convert|83|mpge|kWh/100 km|disp=out}}) || style="text-align:left;" | (1)
|- style="text-align:center;"
| style="text-align:left;" |[[Engineering:Toyota RAV4 EV#Second generation|Toyota RAV4 EV]]<ref>{{cite web|url= http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/Find.do?action=sbs&id=34425&id=33397&id=33308|title=2012/2013/2014 Toyota RAV4 EV|publisher=Fueleconomy.gov|author=U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. Department of Energy|date=2015-12-04|accessdate=2015-12-06}}</ref> || 2012/13/14 ||76 mpg-e<br>(44&nbsp;kW·h/100&nbsp;mi;<br>{{convert|76|mpge|kWh/100 km|disp=out}})||78 mpg-e<br>(43&nbsp;kW·h/100&nbsp;mi;<br>{{convert|78|mpge|kWh/100 km|disp=out}})|| 74 mpg-e<br>(46&nbsp;kW·h/100&nbsp;mi;<br>{{convert|74|mpge|kWh/100 km|disp=out}}) || style="text-align:left;" | (1)
|- style="text-align:center;"
| style="text-align:left;" |[[Engineering:BYD e6|BYD e6]]<ref name=EPA2016MY/><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/Find.do?action=sbs&id=36437&id=34859&id=34860|title=Compare Side-by-Side: 2012/13/14/15 BYD e6|publisher=Fueleconomy.gov|author=U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. Department of Energy|date=2015-12-04|accessdate=2015-12-06}}</ref> || 2012/13/14/15/16 ||63 mpg-e<br>(54&nbsp;kW·h/100&nbsp;mi;<br>{{convert|63|mpge|kWh/100 km|disp=out}})||61 mpg-e<br>(55&nbsp;kW·h/100&nbsp;mi;<br>{{convert|61|mpge|kWh/100 km|disp=out}})|| 65 mpg-e<br>(52&nbsp;kW·h/100&nbsp;mi;<br>{{convert|65|mpge|kWh/100 km|disp=out}} || style="text-align:left;" | (1)
|- style="text-align:center;"
| style="text-align:left; background:#f0f0ff;"|[[Engineering:Chevrolet Volt (second generation)|Second gen Chevrolet Volt]]<ref name=EPA2016MY/><ref name=Voltratings>{{cite web|url=http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/Find.do?action=sbs&id=36863&id=35246|title=Compare Side-by-Side - 2016/2015 Chevrolet Volt|publisher=Fueleconomy.gov|author=U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. Department of Energy|date=2015-12-04|accessdate=2015-12-06}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://insideevs.com/detailed-look-2016-chevrolet-volt-epa-ratings/|title=Detailed Look At 2016 Chevrolet Volt EPA Ratings|author=Eric Loveday|publisher=InsideEVs.com|date=2015-09-01|accessdate=2015-09-02}}</ref><br>[[Engineering:Plug-in hybrid|Plug-in hybrid]] (PHEV)<br> [[Engineering:Charge-depleting|Electricity only/ gasoline only]]||style=" background:#f0f0ff;" | 2016||style="background:#f0f0ff;" |106 mpg-e<br>(31&nbsp;kW·h/100&nbsp;mi;<br>{{convert|106|mpge|kWh/100 km|disp=out}})<br>42 mpg||style="background:#f0f0ff;" | 113 mpg-e<br>({{convert|113|mpge|kWh/100 mi|disp=out}};<br>{{convert|113|mpge|kWh/100 km|disp=out}})<br>43 mpg ||style="background:#f0f0ff;" |99 mpg-e<br>({{convert|99|mpge|kWh/100 mi|disp=out}};<br>{{convert|99|mpge|kWh/100 km|disp=out}})<br>42 mpg || style="text-align:left;" |  (1) (2) (9)
|- style="text-align:center;"
| style="text-align:left;background:#f0f0ff;" | 2016 [[Engineering:Toyota Prius#Fourth generation (XW50; 2015)|Toyota Prius Eco (4th gen)]]<ref name=EPA2016Prius/> <br> [[Engineering:Hybrid electric vehicle|Hybrid electric vehicle]] (HEV)<br> Gasoline-electric hybrid  ||   style="background:#f0f0ff;" | 2016||   style="background:#f0f0ff;" | 56 mpg||style="background:#f0f0ff;" | 58 mpg||  style="background:#f0f0ff;" | 53 mpg || style="text-align:left;" |  (2) (10)
|- style="text-align:center;"
| style="text-align:left;background:#f0f0ff;" | Ford Fusion AWD A-S6 2.0L<ref name=EPA2016MY/><ref name=Avg2016/><br>Gasoline-powered<br>(Average new vehicle)|| style="background:#f0f0ff;" |2016||style="background:#f0f0ff;" | 25 mpg||style="background:#f0f0ff;" | 22&nbsp;mpg|| style="background:#f0f0ff;" | 31&nbsp;mpg || style="text-align:left;" |  (2) (11)
|-
!colspan="8" style="text-align:left; background:#cfc; font-weight: normal; font-size: small; padding-bottom: 6px;" |'''Notes: All estimated fuel economy based on {{convert|15,000|mi|km}} annual driving, 45% highway and 55% city'''<br>
(1) Conversion 1 gallon of gasoline=33.7&nbsp;kW·h.<br>
(2) The 2014 i3 REx is classified by EPA as a series [[Engineering:Plug-in hybrid|plug-in hybrid]], while for CARB is a [[Engineering:Range extender (vehicle)#CARB regulation|range-extended battery-electric vehicle]] (BEVx). The i3 REx is the most fuel economic EPA-certified current year vehicle with a gasoline engine with a combined gasoline/electricity rating of 88&nbsp;mpg-e, but its total range is limited to {{convert|150|mi|abbr=on}}.<ref name=EPAtopten/><ref name=EPAMost/><br>
(3) The 2014/16 BMW i3 (60 A·h) ranked as the most fuel economic EPA-certified vehicle of all fuel types considered in all years until MY 2016. It was surpassed by the 2017 Hyundai Ioniq Electric in November 2016.<ref name=EPAMost>{{cite web|url=http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/extremeMPG.jsp|title=Most Efficient EPA Certified Vehicles|publisher=fueleconomy.gov|author=U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. Department of Energy|date=2016-11-18 |accessdate=2016-11-19}} ''Current Model Year excludes all-electric vehicles.''</ref><br>
(4) The i3 REx has a combined fuel economy in all-electric mode of 117&nbsp;mpg-e (29&nbsp;kW·h/100&nbsp;mi; {{convert|117|mpge|kWh/100 km|0|disp=out}}).<ref name=EPAi3>{{cite web|url=http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/Find.do?action=sbs&id=35207&id=35279|title=Compare Side-by-Side: 2014&nbsp;BMW i3 BEV & 2014&nbsp;BMW i3 REx|website=fueleconomy.gov |author=United States Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. Department of Energy|date=2014-07-04 |accessdate=2014-07-26}}</ref><br>
(5) The 2016 [[Physics:Model year|model year]] Leaf correspond to the variant with the 24&nbsp;kW·h battery pack.<br>
(6) Ratings correspond to both convertible and coupe models.<br>
(7) Model with 85&nbsp;[[Kilowatt-hour|kW·h]] battery pack<br>
(8) Most fuel economic plug-in hybrid capable of long distance travel. The 2016&nbsp;Volt has a rating of 77&nbsp;mpg-e for combined gasoline/electricity operation.<ref name=EPAtopten/><br>
(9) Most fuel economic hybrid electric car.<ref name=EPA2016MY/><ref name=EPAtopten/>
(10) Other 2016 MY cars achieving {{convert|25|mpgus|abbr=on}} combined city/hwy include the [[Engineering:Honda Accord#Ninth generation (2013–present)|Honda Accord A-S6 3.5L]], [[Engineering:Toyota Camry (XV50)|Toyota Camry A-S6 3.5L]] and [[Engineering:Toyota RAV4#Fourth generation (XA40; 2013–present)|Toyota RAV4 A-S6 2.5L]].<ref name=EPA2016MY/><ref name=Avg2016>{{cite web|url=http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/Find.do?action=sbs&id=36157&id=36849&id=36798&id=37088|title=Compare Side-by-Side: 2016 Ford Fusion AWD, 2016 Honda Accord, 2016 Toyota Camry, and 2016 Toyota RAV4 AWD|website=fueleconomy.gov |author=United States Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. Department of Energy|date=2015-12-04|accessdate=2015-12-06}}</ref>
|} 
</onlyinclude>

ADAC also carried out consumption measurements.<ref>(de) [https://www.adac.de/rund-ums-fahrzeug/tests/elektromobilitaet/stromverbrauch-elektroautos-adac-test/ Electricity consumption - electric cars]</ref>
== See also ==
==References==
{{reflist}}


{{Sourceattribution|Electric car EPA fuel economy|1}}