View source for Medicine:Female genital mutilation

{{Short description|Ritual cutting or removal of some or all of the vulva}}
{{pp-semi-indef}}
{{Infobox
|image1      = [[File:Campaign road sign against female genital mutilation (cropped) 2.jpg|300px|alt=Billboard with surgical tools covered by a red X. Sign reads: STOP FEMALE CIRCUMCISION. IT IS DANGEROUS TO WOMEN'S HEALTH. FAMILY PLANNING ASSOCIATION OF UGANDA]]
|caption1    = Anti-FGM road sign near Kapchorwa, Uganda, 2004
|label2      = Definition
|data2       = "Partial or total removal of the external female genitalia or other injury to the female genital organs for non-medical reasons" ([[Organization:World Health Organization|WHO]], UNICEF, and UNFPA, 1997).<ref name=WHO2014>WHO 2014.</ref>
|label3      = Areas
|data3       = [[Earth:Africa|Africa]], [[Place:Southeast Asia|Southeast Asia]], [[Place:Middle East|Middle East]], and within communities from these areas<ref>UNICEF 2013, 5.</ref>
|label4      = Numbers
|data4       = Over 200 million women and girls in 27 African countries; Indonesia; [[Place:Iraqi Kurdistan|Iraqi Kurdistan]]; and Yemen (as of 2023)<ref name=UNICEF2023>{{cite web|url=https://data.unicef.org/topic/child-protection/female-genital-mutilation/ |title=Female genital mutilation (FGM)|work=UNICEF|access-date=July 5, 2023}}</ref><ref name=UNICEF2016>UNICEF 2016.</ref>
|label5      = Age
|data5       = Days after birth to puberty<ref name="UNICEF2013p50"/>
|label6      = Prevalence
|data6       = {{collapsed infobox section begin|Ages 15–49}}
|data7       = {{hlist|Somalia (98%)| Guinea (97%)| Djibouti (93%)| Sierra Leone (90%)| Mali (89%)| [[Place:Egypt|Egypt]] (87%)| Sudan (87%)| Eritrea (83%)| Burkina Faso (76%)|Gambia (75%)| Ethiopia (74%)| Mauritania (69%)| Liberia (50%)| Guinea-Bissau (45%)|Chad (44%)| Côte d'Ivoire (38%)| Nigeria (25%)| Senegal (25%)| Central African Republic (24%)| Kenya (21%)|Yemen (19%)| United Republic of Tanzania (10%)| Benin (9%)|
Iraq (8%)| Togo (5%)| Ghana (4%)| Niger (2%)| Uganda (1%) | Cameroon (1%)<ref name=UNICEF2016/>}}
{{collapsed infobox section end}}
{{collapsed infobox section begin|Ages 0–14}}
|data8       = {{hlist|Gambia (56%)| Mauritania (54%)| Indonesia (49%, 0–11) | Guinea (46%) |Eritrea (33%)| Sudan (32%) | Guinea-Bissau (30%)| Ethiopia (24%) | Nigeria (17%)|Yemen (15%)| [[Place:Egypt|Egypt]] (14%)| Burkina Faso (13%)| Sierra Leone (13%)| Senegal (13%)| Côte d'Ivoire (10%)| Kenya (3%)| Uganda (1%)| Central African Republic (1%)| Ghana (1%)| Togo (0.3%) | Benin (0.2%)<ref name=UNICEF2016/>}}
{{collapsed infobox section end}}
}}

'''Female genital mutilation''' ('''FGM''') (also known as '''female genital cutting''', '''female genital mutilation/cutting''' ('''FGM/C''') and '''female circumcision'''{{efn|[[Biography:Martha Nussbaum|Martha Nussbaum]] (''Sex and Social Justice'', 1999): "Although discussions sometimes use the terms 'female circumcision' and 'clitoridectomy', 'female genital mutilation' (FGM) is the standard generic term for all these procedures in the medical literature&nbsp;... The term 'female circumcision' has been rejected by international medical practitioners because it suggests the fallacious analogy to male circumcision&nbsp;..."{{sfn|Nussbaum|1999|loc=119}}}}) is the ritual cutting or removal of some or all of the [[Medicine:Vulva|vulva]]. The practice is found in some countries of Africa, Asia and the Middle East, and within their respective diasporas. {{As of|2023}}, UNICEF estimates that "at least 200 million girls... in 31 countries"—including Indonesia, Iraq, Yemen, and 27 [[Earth:Africa|Africa]]n countries including [[Place:Egypt|Egypt]]—had been subjected to [[Medicine:Female genital mutilation#Types|one or more types]] of female genital mutilation.<ref name=UNICEF2023/>

Typically carried out by a traditional circumciser using a blade, FGM is conducted from days after birth to puberty and beyond. In half of the countries for which national statistics are available, most girls are cut before the age of five.<ref>For the circumcisers and blade: UNICEF 2013, 2, 44–46; for the ages: 50.</ref> Procedures differ according to the country or [[Social:Ethnic group|ethnic group]]. They include removal of the clitoral hood (type 1-a) and clitoral glans (1-b); removal of the inner labia (2-a); and removal of the inner and outer labia and closure of the vulva (type 3). In this last procedure, known as infibulation, a small hole is left for the passage of urine and [[Medicine:Menstruation|menstrual fluid]]; the [[Biology:Vagina|vagina]] is opened for [[Biology:Sexual intercourse|intercourse]] and opened further for [[Medicine:Childbirth|childbirth]].{{sfn|Abdulcadir|Margairaz|Boulvain|Irion|2011}}

The practice is rooted in gender inequality, attempts to control [[Philosophy:Human female sexuality|women's sexuality]], and ideas about purity, modesty, and beauty. It is usually initiated and carried out by women, who see it as a source of honour, and who fear that failing to have their daughters and granddaughters cut will expose the girls to [[Philosophy:Social exclusion|social exclusion]].<ref>UNICEF 2013, 15; {{harvnb|Toubia|Sharief|2003}}.</ref> Adverse health effects depend on the type of procedure; they can include recurrent infections, difficulty urinating and passing menstrual flow, [[Medicine:Chronic pain|chronic pain]], the development of cysts, an inability to get pregnant, complications during childbirth, and fatal bleeding.{{sfn|Abdulcadir|Margairaz|Boulvain|Irion|2011}} There are no known health benefits.<ref name=WHO2018health>WHO 2018.</ref>

There have been international efforts since the 1970s to persuade practitioners to abandon FGM, and it has been outlawed or restricted in most of the countries in which it occurs, although the laws are often poorly enforced. Since 2010, the {{wipe|United Nations}} has called upon healthcare providers to stop performing all forms of the procedure, including reinfibulation after childbirth and symbolic "nicking" of the clitoral hood.<ref name=UN2010Askew>UN 2010; {{harvnb|Askew|Chaiban|Kalasa|Sen|2016}}.</ref> The opposition to the practice is not without its critics, particularly among anthropologists, who have raised questions about [[Social:Cultural relativism|cultural relativism]] and the universality of [[Philosophy:Human rights|human rights]].<ref>{{harvnb|Shell-Duncan|2008|loc=225}}; {{harvnb|Silverman|2004|loc=420, 427}}.</ref>

==Terminology==
[[File:Samburu female circumcision ceremony, Kenya.jpg|thumb|upright=1.2|left|alt=photograph|Samburu FGM ceremony, Laikipia plateau, Kenya, 2004]]

Until the 1980s, FGM was widely known in English as "female circumcision", implying an equivalence in severity with male circumcision.{{sfn|Nussbaum|1999|loc=119}} From 1929 the Kenya Missionary Council referred to it as the sexual mutilation of women, following the lead of Marion Scott Stevenson, a Church of Scotland missionary.{{sfn|Karanja|2009|loc=[https://books.google.com/books?id=F1ezIgyomGIC&pg=PA93 93], n.&nbsp;631}} References to the practice as mutilation increased throughout the 1970s.<ref name=WHO2008pp4,22>WHO 2008, 4, 22.</ref> In 1975 Rose Oldfield Hayes, an American anthropologist, used the term ''female genital mutilation'' in the title of a paper in ''American Ethnologist'',{{sfn|Hayes|1975}} and four years later Fran Hosken called it mutilation in her influential ''The Hosken Report: Genital and Sexual Mutilation of Females''.{{sfn|Hosken|1994}} The Inter-African Committee on Traditional Practices Affecting the Health of Women and Children began referring to it as female genital mutilation in 1990, and the [[Organization:World Health Organization|World Health Organization]] (WHO) followed suit in 1991.<ref>UNICEF 2013, 6–7.</ref> Other English terms include ''female genital cutting'' (FGC) and ''female genital mutilation/cutting'' (FGM/C), preferred by those who work with practitioners.<ref name=WHO2008pp4,22/>

In countries where FGM is common, the practice's many variants are reflected in dozens of terms, often alluding to purification.<ref name=UNICEF2013p48>UNICEF 2013, 48.</ref> In the [[Social:Bambara language|Bambara language]], spoken mostly in Mali, it is known as ''bolokoli'' ("washing your hands"){{sfn|Zabus|2008|loc=[https://books.google.com/books?id=xZmWF3qxHo4C&pg=PA47 47]}} and in the [[Social:Igbo language|Igbo language]] in eastern Nigeria as ''isa aru'' or ''iwu aru'' ("having your bath").{{efn|For example, "a young woman must 'have her bath' before she has a baby."{{sfn|Zabus|2013|loc=[https://books.google.com/books?id=NCJiAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA40 40]}}}} A common [[Social:Arabic language|Arabic]] term for purification has the root ''t-h-r'', used for male and female circumcision (''tahur'' and ''tahara'').{{sfn|El Guindi|2007|loc=[https://books.google.com/books?id=8VQxt634pfcC&pg=PA30 30]}} It is also known in Arabic as ''khafḍ'' or ''khifaḍ''.{{sfn|Asmani|Abdi|2008|loc=3–5}} Communities may refer to FGM as "pharaonic" for infibulation and "''[[Religion:Sunnah|sunna]]''" circumcision for everything else;{{sfn|Gruenbaum|2001|loc=2–3}} ''sunna'' means "path or way" in Arabic and refers to the tradition of [[Biography:Muhammad|Muhammad]], although none of the procedures are required within Islam.{{sfn|Asmani|Abdi|2008|loc=3–5}} The term ''infibulation'' derives from [[Engineering:Fibula (brooch)|''fibula'']], Latin for clasp; the [[History:Ancient Rome|Ancient Romans]] reportedly fastened clasps through the foreskins or labia of slaves to prevent sexual intercourse. The surgical infibulation of women came to be known as pharaonic circumcision in Sudan and as Sudanese circumcision in Egypt.{{sfn|Kouba|Muasher|1985|loc=96–97}} In Somalia, it is known simply as ''qodob'' ("to sew up").{{sfn|Abdalla|2007|loc=[https://books.google.com/books?id=JO_SBQAAQBAJ&pg=PA190 190]}}
[[File:Clitoris Anatomy.svg|thumb|alt=diagram|upright=0.9|Anatomy of the vulva, showing the clitoral glans, clitoral crura, corpora cavernosa, vestibular bulbs, and vaginal and urethral openings]]

==Methods==
The procedures are generally performed by a traditional circumciser (cutter or ''exciseuse'') in the girls' homes, with or without anaesthesia. The cutter is usually an older woman, but in communities where the male barber has assumed the role of health worker, he will also perform FGM.<ref>UNICEF 2013, 42–44 and table 5, 181 (for cutters), 46 (for home and anaesthesia).</ref>{{efn|UNICEF 2005: "The large majority of girls and women are cut by a traditional practitioner, a category which includes local specialists (cutters or ''exciseuses''), traditional birth attendants and, generally, older members of the community, usually women. This is true for over 80 percent of the girls who undergo the practice in Benin, Burkina Faso, Côte d'Ivoire, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Guinea, Mali, Niger, Tanzania, and Yemen. In most countries, medical personnel, including doctors, nurses, and certified midwives, are not widely involved in the practice."<ref name=UNICEF2005>UNICEF 2005.</ref>}} When traditional cutters are involved, non-sterile devices are likely to be used, including knives, razors, scissors, glass, sharpened rocks, and fingernails.{{sfn|Kelly|Hillard|2005|loc=491}} According to a nurse in Uganda, quoted in 2007 in ''The Lancet'', a cutter would use one knife on up to 30 girls at a time.{{sfn|Wakabi|2007}} In several countries, health professionals are involved; in Egypt, 77 percent of FGM procedures, and in Indonesia over 50 percent, were performed by medical professionals as of 2008 and 2016.<ref>UNICEF 2013, 43–45.</ref><ref name=UNICEF2016/>

==Classification{{anchor|classification}}==
===Variation===
The WHO, UNICEF, and UNFPA issued a joint statement in 1997 defining FGM as "all procedures involving partial or total removal of the external female genitalia or other injury to the female genital organs whether for cultural or other non-therapeutic reasons".<ref name=WHO2008pp4,22/> The procedures vary according to ethnicity and individual practitioners; during a 1998 survey in Niger, women responded with over 50 terms when asked what was done to them.<ref name=UNICEF2013p48/> Translation problems are compounded by the women's confusion over which type of FGM they experienced, or even whether they experienced it.{{sfn|Yoder|Wang|Johansen|2013|loc=190}} Studies have suggested that survey responses are unreliable. A 2003 study in Ghana found that in 1995 four percent said they had not undergone FGM, but in 2000 said they had, while 11 percent switched in the other direction.{{sfn|Jackson|Akweongo|Sakeah|Hodgson|2003}} In Tanzania in 2005, 66 percent reported FGM, but a medical exam found that 73 percent had undergone it.{{sfn|Klouman|Manongi|Klepp|2005}} In Sudan in 2006, a significant percentage of infibulated women and girls reported a less severe type.{{sfn|Elmusharaf|Elhadi|Almroth|2006}}

===Types===
[[File:FGC Types.svg|right|300px|alt=diagram]]
Standard questionnaires from United Nations bodies ask women whether they or their daughters have undergone the following: (1) cut, no flesh removed (symbolic nicking); (2) cut, some flesh removed; (3) sewn closed; or (4) type not determined/unsure/doesn't know.{{efn|UNICEF 2013: "These categories do not fully match the WHO typology. ''Cut, no flesh removed'' describes a practice known as nicking or pricking, which currently is categorized as Type IV. ''Cut, some flesh removed'' corresponds to Type I (clitoridectomy) and Type II (excision) combined. And ''sewn closed'' corresponds to Type III, infibulation."<ref name=UNICEF2013p48/>}} The most common procedures fall within the "cut, some flesh removed" category and involve complete or partial removal of the clitoral glans.<ref>{{harvnb|Yoder|Wang|Johansen|2013|loc=189}}; UNICEF 2013, 47.</ref> The World Health Organization (a UN agency) created a more detailed typology in 1997: Types I–II vary in how much tissue is removed; Type III is equivalent to the UNICEF category "sewn closed"; and Type IV describes miscellaneous procedures, including symbolic nicking.<ref>WHO 2008, 4, 23–28; {{harvnb|Abdulcadir|Catania|Hindin|Say|2016}}.</ref>

====Type I{{anchor|Type I}}====
''Type I'' is "partial or total removal of the clitoral glans (the external and visible part of the clitoris, which is a sensitive part of the female genitals), and/or the prepuce/clitoral hood (the fold of skin surrounding the clitoral glans)".<ref>{{Cite web|title=Female genital mutilation|url=https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/female-genital-mutilation|access-date=2021-04-29|website=www.who.int|language=en|archive-date=29 January 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210129023511/https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/female-genital-mutilation|url-status=live}}</ref> Type Ia{{efn|A diagram in WHO 2016, copied from {{harvnb|Abdulcadir|Catania|Hindin|Say|2016}}, refers to Type 1a as ''circumcision''.<ref name=WHO2016types>WHO 2016, [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK368486/box/ch1.box1 Box 1.1 "Types of FGM"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170908222703/https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK368486/box/ch1.box1 |date=8 September 2017 }}.</ref>}} involves removal of the clitoral hood only. This is rarely performed alone.{{efn|WHO (2018): Type 1&nbsp;... the partial or total removal of the clitoris&nbsp;... and in very rare cases, only the prepuce (the fold of skin surrounding the clitoris)."<ref name=WHO2018health/>{{pb}}
WHO (2008): "[There is a] common tendency to describe Type I as removal of the prepuce, whereas this has not been documented as a traditional form of female genital mutilation. However, in some countries, medicalized female genital mutilation can include removal of the prepuce only (Type Ia) (Thabet and Thabet, 2003), but this form appears to be relatively rare (Satti et al., 2006). Almost all known forms of female genital mutilation that remove tissue from the clitoris also cut all or part of the clitoral glans itself."<ref>WHO 2008, 25. Also see {{harvnb|Toubia|1994}} and {{harvnb|Horowitz|Jackson|Teklemariam|1995}}.</ref>}} The more common procedure is Type Ib ([[Biology:Clitoridectomy|clitoridectomy]]), the complete or partial removal of the clitoral glans (the visible tip of the clitoris) and clitoral hood.<ref name=WHO2014/><ref>WHO 2008, 4.</ref> The circumciser pulls the clitoral glans with her thumb and index finger and cuts it off.{{efn|Susan Izett and Nahid Toubia (WHO, 1998): "[T]he clitoris is held between the thumb and index finger, pulled out and amputated with one stroke of a sharp object."<ref name=WHO1998>WHO 1998.</ref>}}

====Type II{{anchor|Type II}}====
''Type II'' (excision) is the complete or partial removal of the inner labia, with or without removal of the clitoral glans and outer labia. Type IIa is removal of the inner labia; Type IIb, removal of the clitoral glans and inner labia; and Type IIc, removal of the clitoral glans, inner and outer labia. ''Excision'' in French can refer to any form of FGM.<ref name=WHO2014/>

====Type III{{anchor|Type III}}====
{{quote box
|border=1px
|title=External images
|title_fnt=#555555
|halign=left
|quote={{plainlist}}
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20180207062846/https://smw.ch/resource/jf/jimg/780/780/ratio/journal/file/view/article/smw/en/smw.2011.13137/smw_2011_13137_fig_01_conv.jpg/ Type IIIb (virgin)]
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20180207010148/https://smw.ch/resource/jf/jimg/780/780/ratio/journal/file/view/article/smw/en/smw.2011.13137/smw_2011_13137_fig_02_conv.jpg/ Type IIIb (sexually active)]
|qalign=center
|fontsize=95%
|bgcolor=#F9F9F9
|width=300px
|align=right
|salign=right
|style=margin–top:1.5em;margin-bottom:1.5em;padding:1em
|source= — ''Swiss Medical Weekly''{{sfn|Abdulcadir|Margairaz|Boulvain|Irion|2011}}}}

''Type III'' (infibulation or pharaonic circumcision), the "sewn closed" category, is the removal of the external genitalia and fusion of the wound. The inner and/or outer labia are cut away, with or without removal of the clitoral glans.{{efn|WHO 2014: "Narrowing of the vaginal orifice with creation of a covering seal by cutting and appositioning the labia minora and/or the labia majora, with or without excision of the clitoris (infibulation).{{pb}}"Type IIIa, removal and apposition of the labia minora; Type IIIb, removal and apposition of the labia majora."<ref name=WHO2014/>}} Type III is found largely in northeast Africa, particularly Djibouti, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Somalia, and Sudan (although not in South Sudan). According to one 2008 estimate, over eight million women in Africa are living with Type III FGM.{{efn|USAID 2008: "Infibulation is practiced largely in countries located in northeastern Africa: Djibouti, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Somalia, and Sudan.&nbsp;... Sudan alone accounts for about 3.5 million of the women.&nbsp;... [T]he estimate of the total number of women infibulated in [Djibouti, Somalia, Eritrea, northern Sudan, Ethiopia, Guinea, Mali, Burkina Faso, Senegal, Chad, Nigeria, Cameroon, and Tanzania, for women 15–49 years old] comes to 8,245,449, or just over eight million women."{{sfn|Yoder|Khan|2008|loc=13–14}}}} According to UNFPA in 2010, 20 percent of women with FGM have been infibulated.<ref name=UNFPATypeIIIestimate>[http://www.unfpa.org/resources/promoting-gender-equality "Frequently Asked Questions on Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150104112106/http://www.unfpa.org/resources/promoting-gender-equality |date=4 January 2015 }}, United Nations Population Fund, April 2010.</ref> In Somalia, according to Edna Adan Ismail, the child squats on a stool or mat while adults pull her legs open; a local anaesthetic is applied if available:

{{blockquote|The element of speed and surprise is vital and the circumciser immediately grabs the clitoris by pinching it between her nails aiming to amputate it with a slash. The organ is then shown to the senior female relatives of the child who will decide whether the amount that has been removed is satisfactory or whether more is to be cut off.

After the clitoris has been satisfactorily amputated&nbsp;... the circumciser can proceed with the total removal of the labia minora and the paring of the inner walls of the labia majora. Since the entire skin on the inner walls of the labia majora has to be removed all the way down to the perineum, this becomes a messy business. By now, the child is screaming, struggling, and bleeding profusely, which makes it difficult for the circumciser to hold with bare fingers and nails the slippery skin and parts that are to be cut or sutured together.&nbsp;...

Having ensured that sufficient tissue has been removed to allow the desired fusion of the skin, the circumciser pulls together the opposite sides of the labia majora, ensuring that the raw edges where the skin has been removed are well approximated. The wound is now ready to be stitched or for thorns to be applied. If a needle and thread are being used, close tight sutures will be placed to ensure that a flap of skin covers the vulva and extends from the mons veneris to the perineum, and which, after the wound heals, will form a bridge of scar tissue that will totally occlude the vaginal introitus.<ref name=Ismail2016p12>{{harvnb|Ismail|2016|loc=12}}.</ref>}}

The amputated parts might be placed in a pouch for the girl to wear.{{sfn|El Guindi|2007|loc=[https://books.google.com/books?id=8VQxt634pfcC&pg=PA43 43]}} A single hole of 2–3&nbsp;mm is left for the passage of urine and menstrual fluid.{{efn|Jasmine Abdulcadir (''Swiss Medical Weekly'', 2011): "In the case of infibulation, the urethral opening and part of the vaginal opening are covered by the scar. In a virgin infibulated woman the small opening left for the menstrual fluid and the urine is not wider than 2–3&nbsp;mm; in sexually active women and after the delivery the vaginal opening is wider but the urethral orifice is often still covered by the scar."{{sfn|Abdulcadir|Margairaz|Boulvain|Irion|2011}}}} The vulva is closed with surgical thread, or [[Biology:Agave|agave]] or [[Biology:Acacia|acacia]] thorns, and might be covered with a poultice of raw egg, herbs, and sugar. To help the tissue bond, the girl's legs are tied together, often from hip to ankle; the bindings are usually loosened after a week and removed after two to six weeks.{{sfn|Ismail|2016|loc=14}}{{sfn|Kelly|Hillard|2005|loc=491}} If the remaining hole is too large in the view of the girl's family, the procedure is repeated.{{sfn|Abdalla|2007|loc=[https://books.google.com/books?id=8VQxt634pfcC&pg=PA190 190]}}

The vagina is opened for sexual intercourse, for the first time either by a midwife with a knife or by the woman's husband with his penis.{{sfn|Abdalla|2007|loc=[https://books.google.com/books?id=8VQxt634pfcC&pg=PA190 190–191], [https://books.google.com/books?id=8VQxt634pfcC&pg=PA198 198]}} In some areas, including Somaliland, female relatives of the bride and groom might watch the opening of the vagina to check that the girl is a virgin.{{sfn|Ismail|2016|loc=14}}{{anchor|defibulation|deinfibulation|reinfibulation}} The woman is opened further for childbirth (''defibulation'' or ''deinfibulation''), and closed again afterwards (''reinfibulation''). Reinfibulation can involve cutting the vagina again to restore the pinhole size of the first infibulation. This might be performed before marriage, and after childbirth, divorce and widowhood.{{efn|Elizabeth Kelly, Paula J. Adams Hillard (''Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology'', 2005): "Women commonly undergo reinfibulation after a vaginal delivery. In addition to reinfibulation, many women in Sudan undergo a second type of re-suturing called El-Adel, which is performed to recreate the size of the vaginal orifice to be similar to the size created at the time of primary infibulation. Two small cuts are made around the vaginal orifice to expose new tissues to suture, and then sutures are placed to tighten the vaginal orifice and perineum. This procedure, also called re-circumcision, is primarily performed after vaginal delivery, but can also be performed before marriage, after cesarean section, after divorce, and sometimes even in elderly women as a preparation before death."{{sfn|Kelly|Hillard|2005|loc=491}}}}{{sfn|El Dareer|1982|loc=56–64}} Hanny Lightfoot-Klein interviewed hundreds of women and men in Sudan in the 1980s about sexual intercourse with Type III:

{{blockquote|The penetration of the bride's infibulation takes anywhere from 3 or 4 days to several months. Some men are unable to penetrate their wives at all (in my study over 15%), and the task is often accomplished by a midwife under conditions of great secrecy, since this reflects negatively on the man's potency. Some who are unable to penetrate their wives manage to get them pregnant in spite of the infibulation, and the woman's vaginal passage is then cut open to allow birth to take place.&nbsp;... Those men who do manage to penetrate their wives do so often, or perhaps always, with the help of the "little knife". This creates a tear which they gradually rip more and more until the opening is sufficient to admit the penis.<ref>{{harvnb|Lightfoot-Klein|1989|loc=380}}; also see {{harvnb|El Dareer|1982|loc=42–49}}.</ref>}}

====Type IV{{anchor|Type IV}}====
''Type IV'' is "[a]ll other harmful procedures to the female genitalia for non-medical purposes", including pricking, piercing, incising, scraping and cauterization.<ref name=WHO2014/> It includes nicking of the clitoris (symbolic circumcision), burning or scarring the genitals, and introducing substances into the vagina to tighten it.<ref>WHO 2008, 24.</ref><ref>UNICEF 2013, 7.</ref> Labia stretching is also categorized as Type IV.<ref name="WHO 2008, 27">WHO 2008, 27.</ref> Common in southern and eastern Africa, the practice is supposed to enhance sexual pleasure for the man and add to the sense of a woman as a closed space. From the age of eight, girls are encouraged to stretch their inner labia using sticks and massage. Girls in Uganda are told they may have difficulty giving birth without stretched labia.{{efn|WHO 2005: "In some areas (e.g. parts of Congo and mainland Tanzania), FGM entails the pulling of the labia minora and/or clitoris over a period of about 2 to 3 weeks. The procedure is initiated by an old woman designated for this task, who puts sticks of a special type in place to hold the stretched genital parts so that they do not revert back to their original size. The girl is instructed to pull her genitalia every day, to stretch them further, and to put additional sticks in to hold the stretched parts from time to time. This pulling procedure is repeated daily for a period of about two weeks, and usually, no more than four sticks are used to hold the stretched parts, as further pulling and stretching would make the genital parts unacceptably long."<ref>WHO 2005, 31.</ref>}}<ref>For the countries in which labia stretching is found (Botswana, Lesotho, Malawi, Mozambique, Namibia, South Africa, Tanzania, Uganda and Zimbabwe), see {{harvnb|Nzegwu|2011|loc=[https://books.google.com/books?id=xSqIrrswbG0C&pg=PA262 262]}}; for the rest, {{harvnb|Bagnol|Mariano|2011|loc=[https://books.google.com/books?id=xSqIrrswbG0C&pg=PA272 272–276] (272 for Uganda)}}.</ref>

A definition of FGM from the WHO in 1995 included [[Unsolved:Gishiri cutting|gishiri cutting]] and angurya cutting, found in Nigeria and Niger. These were removed from the WHO's 2008 definition because of insufficient information about prevalence and consequences.<ref name="WHO 2008, 27"/> Angurya cutting is excision of the [[Biology:Hymen|hymen]], usually performed seven days after birth. Gishiri cutting involves cutting the vagina's front or back wall with a blade or penknife, performed in response to infertility, obstructed labour, and other conditions. In a study by Nigerian physician Mairo Usman Mandara, over 30 percent of women with gishiri cuts were found to have vesicovaginal fistulae (holes that allow urine to seep into the vagina).<ref>{{harvnb|Mandara|2000|loc=[https://books.google.com/books?id=rhhRXiJIGEcC&pg=PA98 98], 100; for fistulae, 102}}; also see {{harvnb|Mandara|2004}}</ref>

==Complications==
===Short term===
[[File:Anti-FGM campaign, Walala Biyotey, 25 January 2014.jpg|thumb|left|upright=1.5|alt=photograph|FGM awareness session run by the African Union Mission to Somalia at the Walalah Biylooley refugee camp, Mogadishu, 2014]]
FGM harms women's physical and emotional health throughout their lives.{{sfn|Berg|Underland|Odgaard-Jensen|Fretheim|2014}}{{sfn|Reisel|Creighton|2015|loc=49}} It has no known health benefits.<ref name=WHO2018health/> The short-term and late [[Medicine:Complication|complications]] depend on the type of FGM, whether the practitioner has had medical training, and whether they used antibiotics and sterilized or single-use surgical instruments. In the case of Type III, other factors include how small a hole was left for the passage of urine and menstrual blood, whether surgical thread was used instead of agave or acacia thorns, and whether the procedure was performed more than once (for example, to close an opening regarded as too wide or re-open one too small).{{sfn|Abdulcadir|Margairaz|Boulvain|Irion|2011}}

Common short-term complications include swelling, excessive bleeding, pain, [[Medicine:Urinary retention|urine retention]], and healing problems/wound infection. A 2014 systematic review of 56 studies suggested that over one in ten girls and women undergoing any form of FGM, including symbolic nicking of the clitoris (Type IV), experience immediate complications, although the risks increased with Type III. The review also suggested that there was under-reporting.{{efn|Berg and Underland (Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services, 2014): "There was evidence of under-reporting of complications. However, the findings show that the FGM/C procedure unequivocally causes immediate, and typically several, health complications during the FGM/C procedure and the short-term period. Each of the most common complications occurred in more than one of every ten girls and women who undergo FGM/C. The participants in these studies had FGM/C types I through IV, thus immediate complications such as bleeding and swelling occur in setting with all forms of FGM/C. Even FGM/C type I and type IV 'nick', the forms of FGM/C with least anatomical extent, presented immediate complications. The results document that multiple immediate and quite serious complications can result from FGM/C. These results should be viewed in light of long-term complications, such as obstetric and gynecological problems, and protection of human rights."{{sfn|Berg|Underland|2014|loc=2}}}} Other short-term complications include fatal bleeding, anaemia, urinary infection, septicaemia, [[Medicine:Tetanus|tetanus]], [[Medicine:Gangrene|gangrene]], [[Medicine:Necrotizing fasciitis|necrotizing fasciitis]] (flesh-eating disease), and [[Medicine:Endometritis|endometritis]].<ref>{{harvnb|Reisel|Creighton|2015|loc=49}}; {{harvnb|Iavazzo|Sardi|Gkegkes|2013}}; {{harvnb|Abdulcadir|Margairaz|Boulvain|Irion|2011}}.</ref> It is not known how many girls and women die as a result of the practice, because complications may not be recognized or reported. The practitioners' use of shared instruments is thought to aid the transmission of [[Medicine:Hepatitis B|hepatitis B]], [[Medicine:Hepatitis C|hepatitis C]] and [[Biology:HIV|HIV]], although no epidemiological studies have shown this.{{sfn|Reisel|Creighton|2015|loc=50}}

===Long term===
Late complications vary depending on the type of FGM.{{sfn|Abdulcadir|Margairaz|Boulvain|Irion|2011}} They include the formation of scars and [[Medicine:Keloid|keloid]]s that lead to [[Medicine:Stenosis|strictures]] and obstruction, epidermoid cysts that may become infected, and [[Medicine:Neuroma|neuroma]] formation (growth of nerve tissue) involving nerves that supplied the clitoris.{{sfn|Kelly|Hillard|2005|loc=491–492}}{{sfn|Dave|Sethi|Morrone|2011}} An infibulated girl may be left with an opening as small as 2–3&nbsp;mm, which can cause prolonged, drop-by-drop [[Biology:Urination|urination]], pain while urinating, and a feeling of needing to urinate all the time. Urine may collect underneath the scar, leaving the area under the skin constantly wet, which can lead to infection and the formation of small stones. The opening is larger in women who are sexually active or have given birth by vaginal delivery, but the urethra opening may still be obstructed by scar tissue. Vesicovaginal or rectovaginal fistulae can develop (holes that allow urine or faeces to seep into the vagina).{{sfn|Abdulcadir|Margairaz|Boulvain|Irion|2011}}{{sfn|Rushwan|2013|loc=132}} This and other damage to the urethra and bladder can lead to infections and incontinence, pain during sexual intercourse and [[Medicine:Infertility|infertility]].{{sfn|Kelly|Hillard|2005|loc=491–492}}

[[Medicine:Dysmenorrhea|Painful periods]] are common because of the obstruction to the [[Medicine:Menstruation|menstrual flow]], and blood can stagnate in the vagina and uterus. Complete obstruction of the vagina can result in hematocolpos and hematometra (where the vagina and uterus fill with menstrual blood).{{sfn|Abdulcadir|Margairaz|Boulvain|Irion|2011}} The swelling of the abdomen and lack of menstruation can resemble pregnancy.{{sfn|Rushwan|2013|loc=132}} Asma El Dareer, a Sudanese physician, reported in 1979 that a girl in Sudan with this condition was killed by her family.{{sfn|El Dareer|1982|loc=37}}

===Pregnancy, childbirth===
[[File:Teaching_communities_about_FGM-C_(12345176104).jpg|thumb|Materials used to teach communities in Burkina Faso about FGM]]
FGM may place women at higher risk of problems during pregnancy and childbirth, which are more common with the more extensive FGM procedures.{{sfn|Abdulcadir|Margairaz|Boulvain|Irion|2011}} Infibulated women may try to make childbirth easier by eating less during pregnancy to reduce the baby's size.<ref name=RashidRashid2007/>{{rp|99}} In women with vesicovaginal or rectovaginal fistulae, it is difficult to obtain clear urine samples as part of prenatal care, making the diagnosis of conditions such as [[Medicine:Pre-eclampsia|pre-eclampsia]] harder.{{sfn|Kelly|Hillard|2005|loc=491–492}} Cervical evaluation during labour may be impeded and labour prolonged or obstructed. Third-degree laceration (tears), [[Biology:Human anus|anal-sphincter]] damage and emergency [[Medicine:Caesarean section|caesarean section]] are more common in infibulated women.{{sfn|Abdulcadir|Margairaz|Boulvain|Irion|2011}}<ref name=RashidRashid2007>{{harvnb|Rashid|Rashid|2007|loc=97}}.</ref>

[[Medicine:Perinatal mortality#Neonatal mortality|Neonatal mortality]] is increased. The WHO estimated in 2006 that an additional 10–20 babies die per 1,000 deliveries as a result of FGM. The estimate was based on a study conducted on 28,393 women attending delivery wards at 28 obstetric centres in Burkina Faso, Ghana, Kenya, Nigeria, Senegal, and Sudan. In those settings all types of FGM were found to pose an increased risk of death to the baby: 15 percent higher for Type I, 32 percent for Type II, and 55 percent for Type III. The reasons for this were unclear, but may be connected to genital and [[Medicine:Urinary tract infection|urinary tract infection]]s and the presence of scar tissue. According to the study, FGM was associated with an increased risk to the mother of damage to the perineum and [[Medicine:Postpartum bleeding|excessive blood loss]], as well as a need to resuscitate the baby, and [[Medicine:Stillbirth|stillbirth]], perhaps because of a long [[Medicine:Childbirth#Second stage: fetal expulsion|second stage of labour]].{{sfn|Banks|Meirik|Farley|Akande|2006}}<ref>[http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/2006/pr30/en/index.html "New study shows female genital mutilation exposes women and babies to significant risk at childbirth"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190502223749/https://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/fgm/fgm-obstetric-study-en.pdf?ua=1 |date=2 May 2019 }}, World Health Organization, 2 June 2006.</ref>

===Psychological effects, sexual function===
According to a 2015 [[Systematic review|systematic review]] there is little high-quality information available on the psychological effects of FGM. Several small studies have concluded that women with FGM develop anxiety, depression, and [[Medicine:Post-traumatic stress disorder|post-traumatic stress disorder]].{{sfn|Reisel|Creighton|2015|loc=50}} Feelings of shame and betrayal can develop when women leave the culture that practices FGM and learn that their condition is not the norm, but within the practicing culture, they may view their FGM with pride because for them it signifies beauty, respect for tradition, chastity and hygiene.{{sfn|Abdulcadir|Margairaz|Boulvain|Irion|2011}} Studies on sexual function have also been small.{{sfn|Reisel|Creighton|2015|loc=50}} A 2013 [[Meta-analysis|meta-analysis]] of 15 studies involving 12,671 women from seven countries concluded that women with FGM were twice as likely to report no sexual desire and 52 percent more likely to report dyspareunia (painful sexual intercourse). One-third reported reduced sexual feelings.<ref>{{harvnb|Berg|Denison|2013}}; {{harvnb|Reisel|Creighton|2015|loc=51}}; {{harvnb|Sibiani|Rouzi|2008}}</ref>

==Distribution==
===Household surveys===
[[File:2020 Global Response report FGM world map.svg|thumb|500px|Map showing the % of women and girls aged 15–49 years (unless otherwise stated) who have undergone FGM/C according to the March 2020 Global Response report.<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.endfgm.eu/editor/files/2020/04/FGM_Global_-_ONLINE_PDF_VERSION_-_07.pdf |title=Female genital mutilation/cutting: a call for a global response |publisher=End FGM European Network, U.S. End FGM/C Network and Equality Now |date=March 2020 |accessdate=6 May 2020}}</ref> Grey countries' data are not covered.]]
Aid agencies define the prevalence of FGM as the percentage of the 15–49 age group that has experienced it.{{sfn|Yoder|Wang|Johansen|2013|loc=193}} These figures are based on nationally representative household surveys known as [[Biology:Demographic and Health Surveys|Demographic and Health Surveys]] (DHS), developed by Macro International and funded mainly by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID); and Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys (MICS) conducted with financial and technical help from UNICEF.{{sfn|Yoder|Wang|Johansen|2013|loc=190}} These surveys have been carried out in Africa, Asia, Latin America, and elsewhere roughly every five years since 1984 and 1995 respectively.<ref name=DHS>[http://www.dhsprogram.com/What-We-Do/Survey-Types/DHS.cfm "DHS overview"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141016202457/http://www.dhsprogram.com/What-We-Do/Survey-Types/DHS.cfm |date=16 October 2014 }}, Demographic and Health Surveys; [http://www.childinfo.org/mics5_questionnaire.html "Questionnaires and Indicator List"], Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys, UNICEF.</ref> The first to ask about FGM was the 1989–1990 DHS in northern Sudan. The first publication to estimate FGM prevalence based on DHS data (in seven countries) was written by Dara Carr of Macro International in 1997.{{sfn|Yoder|Wang|Johansen|2013}}

===Type of FGM===
Questions the women are asked during the surveys include: "Was the genital area just nicked/cut without removing any flesh? Was any flesh (or something) removed from the genital area? Was your genital area sewn?"<ref>UNICEF 2013, 134–135.</ref> Most women report "cut, some flesh removed" (Types I and II).<ref name=Yoder2013p189TypeI>UNICEF 2013, 47, table 5.2; {{harvnb|Yoder|Wang|Johansen|2013|loc=189}}.</ref>

Type I is the most common form in Egypt,{{sfn|Rasheed|Abd-Ellah|Yousef|2011}} and in the southern parts of Nigeria.{{sfn|Okeke|Anyaehie|Ezenyeaku|2012|loc=70–73}} Type III (infibulation) is concentrated in northeastern Africa, particularly Djibouti, Eritrea, Somalia, and Sudan.{{sfn|Yoder|Khan|2008|loc=13–14}} In surveys in 2002–2006, 30 percent of cut girls in Djibouti, 38 percent in Eritrea, and 63 percent in Somalia had experienced Type III.<ref>UNICEF 2013, 47. For the years and country profiles: Djibouti, UNICEF, December 2013; Eritrea, UNICEF, July 2013; Somalia, UNICEF, December 2013.</ref> There is also a high prevalence of infibulation among girls in Niger and Senegal,<ref>UNICEF 2013, 114.</ref> and in 2013 it was estimated that in Nigeria three percent of the 0–14 age group had been infibulated.<ref>Nigeria, UNICEF, July 2014.</ref> The type of procedure is often linked to ethnicity. In Eritrea, for example, a survey in 2002 found that all Hedareb girls had been infibulated, compared with two percent of the Tigrinya, most of whom fell into the "cut, no flesh removed" category.<ref name=UNICEF2013p48/>

===Prevalence===
{{multiple image
 | align = right
 | direction = vertical
 | width = 200
 | header = Downward trend
 | image1 = FGM prevalence 15–49 (2016).jpg
 | alt1 = graph
 | caption1 = Percentage of 15–49 group who have undergone FGM in 29 countries for which figures were available in 2016<ref name=UNICEF2016/>
 | image2 = FGM prevalence 0–14 (2016).jpg
 | alt2 = graph
 | caption2 = Percentage of 0–14 group who have undergone FGM in 21 countries for which figures were available in 2016<ref name=UNICEF2016/>
}}
FGM is mostly found in what Gerry Mackie called an "intriguingly contiguous" zone in Africa—east to west from Somalia to Senegal, and north to south from Egypt to Tanzania.<ref>Mackie and LeJeune (UNICEF) 2008, 5.</ref> Nationally representative figures are available for 27 countries in Africa, as well as Indonesia, Iraqi Kurdistan and Yemen. Over 200 million women and girls are thought to be living with FGM in those 30 countries.<ref name=UNICEF2023/><ref name=UNICEF2016/><ref name=UNICEFIndonesia2016>UNICEF Indonesia, February 2016.</ref>

The highest concentrations among the 15–49 age group are in Somalia (98 percent), Guinea (97 percent), Djibouti (93 percent), Egypt (91 percent), and Sierra Leone (90 percent).<ref name=UNICEF2014pp89-90>UNICEF 2014, 89–90.</ref> As of 2013, 27.2 million women had undergone FGM in Egypt, 23.8 million in Ethiopia, and 19.9 million in Nigeria.<ref>UNICEF 2013, 2.</ref> There is a high concentration in Indonesia, where according to UNICEF Type I (clitoridectomy) and Type IV (symbolic nicking) are practised; the Indonesian Ministry of Health and Indonesian Ulema Council both say the clitoris should not be cut. The prevalence rate for the 0–11 group in Indonesia is 49 percent (13.4 million).<ref name=UNICEFIndonesia2016/>{{rp|2}} Smaller studies or anecdotal reports suggest that various types of FGM are also practised in various circumstances in Colombia, Jordan, Oman, Saudi Arabia,<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Milaat |first1=Waleed Abdullah |last2=Ibrahim |first2=Nahla Khamis |last3=Albar |first3=Hussain Mohammed |date=2018-03-01 |title=Reproductive health profile and circumcision of females in the Hali semi-urban region, Saudi Arabia: A community-based cross-sectional survey |journal=Annals of Saudi Medicine |language=en |volume=38 |issue=2 |pages=81–89 |doi=10.5144/0256-4947.2018.81 |issn=0256-4947 |pmc=6074365 |pmid=29620540}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Rouzi |first1=Abdulrahim A |last2=Berg |first2=Rigmor C |last3=Alamoudi |first3=Rana |last4=Alzaban |first4=Faten |last5=Sehlo |first5=Mohammad |date=2019-06-01 |title=Survey on female genital mutilation/cutting in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia |journal=BMJ Open |volume=9 |issue=5 |pages=e024684 |doi=10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024684 |issn=2044-6055 |pmc=6549616 |pmid=31154295}}</ref> Malaysia,<ref name="UNICEF 2013, 23">UNICEF 2013, 23.</ref> the [[Place:United Arab Emirates|United Arab Emirates]],<ref name=UNICEF2016/> and {{wipe|India}},<ref>{{cite web|title='I was crying with unbearable pain': study reveals extent of FGM in India |url=https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2018/mar/06/study-reveals-fgm-india-female-genital-mutilation |last=Cantera |first=Angel L Martínez |date=6 March 2018 |work=The Guardian |access-date=9 November 2018}}</ref> but there are no representative data on the prevalence in these countries.<ref name=UNICEF2016/> {{As of|2023}}, UNICEF reported that "The highest levels of support for FGM can be found in Mali, Sierra Leone, Guinea, the Gambia, Somalia, and Egypt, where more than half of the female population thinks the practice should continue".<ref name=UNICEF2023/>

Prevalence figures for the 15–19 age group and younger show a downward trend.{{efn|UNICEF 2013: "The percentage of girls and women of reproductive age (15 to 49) who have experienced any form of FGM/C is the first indicator used to show how widespread the practice is in a particular country&nbsp;... A second indicator of national prevalence measures the extent of cutting among daughters aged 0 to 14, as reported by their mothers. Prevalence data for girls reflect their current&nbsp;– not final&nbsp;– FGM/C status, since many of them may not have reached the customary age for cutting at the time of the survey. They are reported as being uncut but are still at risk of undergoing the procedure. Statistics for girls under age 15 therefore need to be interpreted with a high degree of caution&nbsp;..."<ref name="UNICEF 2013, 23"/>
{{pb}} An additional complication in judging prevalence among girls is that, in countries running campaigns against FGM, women might not report that their daughters have been cut.<ref>UNICEF 2013, 25, 100; {{harvnb|Yoder|Wang|Johansen|2013|loc=196}}.</ref>}} For example, Burkina Faso fell from 89 percent (1980) to 58 percent (2010); Egypt from 97 percent (1985) to 70 percent (2015); and Kenya from 41 percent (1984) to 11 percent (2014).<ref>UNICEF 2016, 1.</ref> Beginning in 2010, household surveys asked women about the FGM status of all their living daughters.<ref>{{harvnb|Yoder|Wang|Johansen|2013|loc=194}}; UNICEF 2013, 25.</ref> The highest concentrations among girls aged 0–14 were in Gambia (56 percent), Mauritania (54 percent), Indonesia (49 percent for 0–11) and Guinea (46 percent).<ref name=UNICEF2016/> The figures suggest that a girl was one third less likely in 2014 to undergo FGM than she was 30 years ago.<ref>UNICEF 2014, 2.</ref> According to a 2018 study published in ''BMJ Global Health'', the prevalence within the 0–14 year old group fell in East Africa from 71.4 percent in 1995 to 8 percent in 2016; in North Africa from 57.7 percent in 1990 to 14.1 percent in 2015; and in West Africa from 73.6 percent in 1996 to 25.4 percent in 2017.<ref>{{harvnb|Kandala|Ezejimofor|Uthman|Komba|2018}}; {{cite news |last1=Ratcliffe |first1=Rebecca |title=FGM rates in east Africa drop from 71% to 8% in 20 years, study shows |url=https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2018/nov/07/fgm-rates-in-east-africa-drop-20-years-study-shows |work=The Guardian |date=7 November 2018 |access-date=7 November 2018 |archive-date=15 August 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200815062044/https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2018/nov/07/fgm-rates-in-east-africa-drop-20-years-study-shows |url-status=live }}</ref> If the current rate of decline continues, the number of girls cut will nevertheless continue to rise because of population growth, according to UNICEF in 2014; they estimate that the figure will increase from 3.6 million a year in 2013 to 4.1 million in 2050.{{efn|UNICEF 2014: "If there is no reduction in the practice between now and 2050, the number of girls cut each year will grow from 3.6 million in 2013 to 6.6 million in 2050. But if the rate of progress achieved over the last 30 years is maintained, the number of girls affected annually will go from 3.6 million today to 4.1 million in 2050.{{pb}}"In either scenario, the total number of girls and women cut will continue to increase due to population growth. If nothing is done, the number of girls and women affected will grow from 133 million today to 325 million in 2050. However, if the progress made so far is sustained, the number will grow from 133 million to 196 million in 2050, and almost 130 million girls will be spared this grave assault to their human rights."<ref>UNICEF 2014, 3.</ref>}}

===Rural areas, wealth, education===
Surveys have found FGM to be more common in rural areas, less common in most countries among girls from the wealthiest homes, and (except in Sudan and Somalia) less common in girls whose mothers had access to primary or secondary/higher education. In Somalia and Sudan the situation was reversed: in Somalia, the mothers' access to secondary/higher education was accompanied by a rise in prevalence of FGM in their daughters, and in Sudan, access to any education was accompanied by a rise.<ref>For rural areas, UNICEF 2013, 28; for wealth, 40; for education, 41.</ref>

===Age, ethnicity===
FGM is not invariably a [[Religion:Rite of passage|rite of passage]] between childhood and adulthood but is often performed on much younger children.{{sfn|Mackie|2000|loc=275}} Girls are most commonly cut shortly after birth to age 15. In half the countries for which national figures were available in 2000–2010, most girls had been cut by age five.<ref name=UNICEF2013p50>UNICEF 2013, 50.</ref> Over 80 percent (of those cut) are cut before the age of five in Nigeria, Mali, Eritrea, Ghana and Mauritania.<ref name=UNICEF2013pp47,183>UNICEF 2013, 47, 183.</ref> The 1997 Demographic and Health Survey in Yemen found that 76 percent of girls had been cut within two weeks of birth.<ref>[http://www.unicef-irc.org/publications/pdf/fgm_eng.pdf UNICEF 2005] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180928122738/http://www.unicef-irc.org/publications/pdf/fgm_eng.pdf |date=28 September 2018 }}, 6.</ref> The percentage is reversed in Somalia, Egypt, Chad, and the Central African Republic, where over 80 percent (of those cut) are cut between five and 14.<ref name=UNICEF2013pp47,183/> Just as the type of FGM is often linked to ethnicity, so is the mean age. In Kenya, for example, the Kisi cut around age 10 and the Kamba at 16.<ref>UNICEF 2013, 51.</ref>

A country's national prevalence often reflects a high sub-national prevalence among certain ethnicities, rather than a widespread practice.<ref>UNICEF 2013, 28–37.</ref> In Iraq, for example, FGM is found mostly among the Kurds in [[Place:Erbil|Erbil]] (58 percent prevalence within age group 15–49, as of 2011), [[Place:Sulaymaniyah|Sulaymaniyah]] (54 percent) and [[Place:Kirkuk|Kirkuk]] (20 percent), giving the country a national prevalence of eight percent.<ref>[http://www.unicef.org/media/files/FGCM_Lo_res.pdf UNICEF 2013] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150405083031/http://www.unicef.org/media/files/FGCM_Lo_res.pdf |date=5 April 2015 }}. For eight percent in Iraq, 27, box&nbsp;4.4, group&nbsp;5; for the regions in Iraq, 31, map&nbsp;4.6). Also see {{harvnb|Yasin|Al-Tawil|Shabila|Al-Hadithi|2013}}.</ref> The practice is sometimes an ethnic marker, but it may differ along national lines. For example, in the northeastern regions of Ethiopia and Kenya, which share a border with Somalia, the Somali people practise FGM at around the same rate as they do in Somalia.{{sfn|Yoder|Wang|Johansen|2013|loc=196, 198}} But in Guinea all Fulani women responding to a survey in 2012 said they had experienced FGM,<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20141220043131/http://data.unicef.org/corecode/uploads/document6/uploaded_country_profiles/corecode/30/Countries/FGMC_GIN.pdf "Guinea"] (2012), UNICEF statistical profile, July 2014, 2/4.</ref> against 12 percent of the Fulani in Chad, while in Nigeria the Fulani are the only large ethnic group in the country not to practise it.<ref>Chad: UNICEF 2013, 35–36; Nigeria: {{harvnb|Okeke|Anyaehie|Ezenyeaku|2012|loc=70–73}}. FGM is practised in Nigeria by the Yoruba, Hausa, Ibo, Ijaw, and Kanuri people.</ref> In Sierra Leone, the predominantly Christian Creole people are the only ethnicity  not known to practice FGM or participate in Bondo society rituals.<ref name="Bassir, Olumbe 1954">[Bassir, Olumbe (July 1954). "Marriage Rites among the Aku (Yoruba) of Freetown". Africa: Journal of the International African Institute. 24 (3): 251–256]</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.28toomany.org/static/media/uploads/Country%20Images/PDF/sierra_leone_country_profile_v2_(october_2018).pdf|title=FMG in Sierra Leone|publisher=28TooMany, Registered Charity: No. 1150379|access-date=2021-12-22|archive-date=2021-12-22|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211222125403/https://www.28toomany.org/static/media/uploads/Country%20Images/PDF/sierra_leone_country_profile_v2_(october_2018).pdf|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.refworld.org/docid/4b20f02bc.html |title=Canada: Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada, Sierra Leone: The practice of female genital mutilation (FGM); the government's position with respect to the practice; consequences of refusing to become an FGM practitioner in Bondo Society, specifically, if a daughter of a practitioner refuses to succeed her mother, 27 March 2009, SLE103015.E|publisher=Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada}}</ref>

==Reasons==
===Support from women===
{{anchor|Pulitzer}}
{{quote box
|border=1px
|title=1996 Pulitzer Prize for Feature Photography
|title_fnt=#555555
|halign=left
|quote=[https://web.archive.org/web/20151007101527/http://www.pulitzer.org/works/1996-Feature-Photography Kenyan FGM ceremony]|qalign=center
|fontsize=95%
|bgcolor=#F9F9F9
|width=220px
|align=right
|salign=right
|style=margin–top:1.5em;margin-bottom:1.5em;padding:1.0em
|source= &nbsp;— Stephanie Welsh, Newhouse News Service<ref>{{cite web |title=Stephanie Welsh. The 1996 Pulitzer Prize Winners: Feature Photography |url=http://www.pulitzer.org/works/1996-Feature-Photography |publisher=The Pulitzer Prizes|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151007101527/http://www.pulitzer.org/works/1996-Feature-Photography |archive-date=7 October 2015 |date=1996|url-status=live}}</ref>}}
Dahabo Musa, a Somali woman, described infibulation in a 1988 poem as the "three feminine sorrows": the procedure itself, the wedding night when the woman is cut open, then childbirth when she is cut again.{{sfn|Abdalla|2007|loc=[https://books.google.com/books?id=8VQxt634pfcC&pg=PA187 187]}} Despite the evident suffering, it is women who organize all forms of FGM.{{sfn|El Guindi|2007|loc=35, 42, 46}}{{efn|Gerry Mackie (1996): "Virtually every ethnography and report states that FGM is defended and transmitted by the women."{{sfn|Mackie|1996|loc=1003}}{{pb}}
Fadwa El Guindi (2007): "Female circumcision belongs to the women's world, and ordinarily men know little about it or how it is performed—a fact that is widely confirmed in ethnographic studies."{{sfn|El Guindi|2007|loc=35}}{{pb}}
Bettina Shell-Duncan (2008): "[T]he fact that the decision to perform FGC is often firmly in the control of women weakens the claim of gender discrimination."{{sfn|Shell-Duncan|2008|loc=228}}{{pb}}
Bettina Shell-Duncan (2015): "[W]hen you talk to people on the ground, you also hear people talking about the idea that it's women's business. As in, it's for women to decide this. If we look at the data across Africa, the support for the practice is stronger among women than among men."{{sfn|Khazan|2015}}}} Anthropologist Rose Oldfield Hayes wrote in 1975 that educated Sudanese men who did not want their daughters to be infibulated (preferring clitoridectomy) would find the girls had been sewn up after the grandmothers arranged a visit to relatives.{{sfn|Hayes|1975|loc=620, 624}} Gerry Mackie has compared the practice to footbinding. Like FGM, footbinding was carried out on young girls, nearly universal where practised, tied to ideas about honour, chastity, and appropriate marriage, and "supported and transmitted" by women.{{efn|Gerry Mackie, 1996: "Footbinding and infibulation correspond as follows. Both customs are nearly universal where practised; they are persistent and are practised even by those who oppose them. Both control sexual access to females and ensure female chastity and fidelity. Both are necessary for proper marriage and family honor. Both are believed to be sanctioned by tradition. Both are said to be ethnic markers, and distinct ethnic minorities may lack the practices. Both seem to have a past of contagious diffusion. Both are exaggerated over time and both increase with status. Both are supported and transmitted by women, are performed on girls about six to eight years old, and are generally not initiation rites. Both are believed to promote health and fertility. Both are defined as aesthetically pleasing compared with the natural alternative. Both are said to properly exaggerate the complementarity of the sexes, and both are claimed to make intercourse more pleasurable for the male."{{sfn|Mackie|1996|loc=999–1000}}}}

[[File:Fuambai Sia Ahmadu (1).jpg|left|thumb|upright|alt=photograph|Fuambai Ahmadu chose to undergo clitoridectomy as an adult.<ref name=Ahmadu2000/>]]
FGM practitioners see the procedures as marking not only ethnic boundaries but also gender differences. According to this view, male circumcision defeminizes men while FGM demasculinizes women.<ref>{{harvnb|Abusharaf|2007|loc=8}}; {{harvnb|El Guindi|2007|loc=[https://books.google.com/books?id=8VQxt634pfcC&pg=PA36 36–37]}}.</ref> Fuambai Ahmadu, an anthropologist and member of the Kono people of Sierra Leone, who in 1992 underwent clitoridectomy as an adult during a Sande society initiation, argued in 2000 that it is a male-centred assumption that the clitoris is important to female sexuality. African female symbolism revolves instead around the concept of the womb.<ref name=Ahmadu2000>{{harvnb|Ahmadu|2000|loc=[https://books.google.com/books?id=rhhRXiJIGEcC&pg=PA284 284–285]}}.</ref> Infibulation draws on that idea of enclosure and fertility. "[G]enital cutting completes the social definition of a child's sex by eliminating external traces of androgyny," Janice Boddy wrote in 2007. "The female body is then covered, closed, and its productive blood bound within; the male body is unveiled, opened, and exposed."<ref>{{harvnb|Boddy|2007|loc=[https://books.google.com/books?id=T77ui7IPNwkC&pg=PA112 112]}}; also see {{harvnb|Boddy|1989|loc=[https://books.google.com/books?id=TK6NIp5uVwsC&pg=PA52 52–61]}}.</ref>

In communities where infibulation is common, there is a preference for women's genitals to be smooth, dry and without odour, and both women and men may find the natural vulva repulsive.{{sfn|Gruenbaum|2005|loc=435–436}} Some men seem to enjoy the effort of penetrating an infibulation.<ref>{{harvnb|Gruenbaum|2005|loc=437}}; {{harvnb|Gruenbaum|2001|loc=140}}.</ref> The local preference for [[Medicine:Dry sex|dry sex]] causes women to introduce substances into the vagina to reduce lubrication, including leaves, tree bark, toothpaste and Vicks menthol rub.{{sfn|Bagnol|Mariano|2011|loc=[https://books.google.com/books?id=xSqIrrswbG0C&pg=PA277 277–281]}} The WHO includes this practice within Type IV FGM, because the added friction during intercourse can cause lacerations and increase the risk of infection.<ref>WHO 2008, 27–28.</ref> Because of the smooth appearance of an infibulated vulva, there is also a belief that infibulation increases hygiene.{{sfn|Gruenbaum|2005|loc=437}}

Common reasons for FGM cited by women in surveys are social acceptance, religion, hygiene, preservation of virginity, marriageability and enhancement of male sexual pleasure.<ref>UNICEF 2013, 67.</ref> In a study in northern Sudan, published in 1983, only 17.4 percent of women opposed FGM (558 out of 3,210), and most preferred excision and infibulation over clitoridectomy.{{sfn|El Dareer|1983|loc=140}} Attitudes are changing slowly. In Sudan in 2010, 42 percent of women who had heard of FGM said the practice should continue.<ref>UNICEF 2013, 178.</ref> In several surveys since 2006, over 50 percent of women in Mali, Guinea, Sierra Leone, Somalia, Gambia, and Egypt supported FGM's continuance, while elsewhere in Africa, Iraq, and Yemen most said it should end, although in several countries only by a narrow margin.<ref>UNICEF 2013, 52. Also see figure 6.1, 54, and figures 8.1A&nbsp;– 8.1D, 90–91.</ref>

===Social obligation, poor access to information===
[[File:Keur Simbara, Senegal (8592417042), cropped.jpg|thumb|upright=1.2|alt=photograph|Keur Simbara, Senegal, abandoned FGM in 1998 after a three-year program by Tostan.<ref>Gueye, Malick (4 February 2014). [http://www.tostan.org/blog/social-norm-change-theorists-meet-again-keur-simbara-senegal "Social Norm Change Theorists meet again in Keur Simbara, Senegal"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170311194456/http://www.tostan.org/blog/social-norm-change-theorists-meet-again-keur-simbara-senegal |date=11 March 2017 }}, Tostan.</ref>]]

Against the argument that women willingly choose FGM for their daughters, UNICEF calls the practice a "self-enforcing social convention" to which families feel they must conform to avoid uncut daughters facing social exclusion.<ref>UNICEF 2013, 15.</ref> Ellen Gruenbaum reported that, in Sudan in the 1970s, cut girls from an Arab ethnic group would mock uncut Zabarma girls with ''Ya, ghalfa!'' ("Hey, unclean!"). The Zabarma girls would respond ''Ya, mutmura!'' (A ''mutmara'' was a storage pit for grain that was continually opened and closed, like an infibulated woman.) But despite throwing the insult back, the Zabarma girls would ask their mothers, "What's the matter? Don't we have razor blades like the Arabs?"{{sfn|Gruenbaum|2005|loc=432–433}}

Because of poor access to information, and because circumcisers downplay the causal connection, women may not associate the health consequences with the procedure. Lala Baldé, president of a women's association in Medina Cherif, a village in Senegal, told Mackie in 1998 that when girls fell ill or died, it was attributed to evil spirits. When informed of the causal relationship between FGM and ill health, Mackie wrote, the women broke down and wept. He argued that surveys taken before and after this sharing of information would show very different levels of support for FGM.{{sfn|Mackie|2003|loc=147–148}} The American non-profit group Tostan, founded by Molly Melching in 1991, introduced community-empowerment programs in several countries that focus on local democracy, literacy, and education about healthcare, giving women the tools to make their own decisions.<ref>Diop et al. (UNICEF) 2008.</ref> In 1997, using the Tostan program, Malicounda Bambara in Senegal became the first village to abandon FGM.{{sfn|Mackie|2000|loc=256ff}} By August 2019, 8,800 communities in eight countries had pledged to abandon FGM and [[Social:Child marriage|child marriage]].{{efn|The eight countries are Djibouti, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Mali, Mauritania, Senegal, Somalia, and the Gambia.<ref>{{cite web |title=Female Genital Cutting |url=https://www.tostan.org/areas-of-impact/cross-cutting-gender-social-norms/female-genital-cutting/ |publisher=Tostan |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190826031944/https://www.tostan.org/areas-of-impact/cross-cutting-gender-social-norms/female-genital-cutting/ |archive-date=26 August 2019|url-status=live}}</ref>}}

===Religion===
Surveys have shown a widespread belief, particularly in Mali, Mauritania, Guinea, and Egypt, that FGM is a religious requirement.<ref>UNICEF 2013, 69–71.</ref> Gruenbaum has argued that practitioners may not distinguish between religion, tradition, and chastity, making it difficult to interpret the data.<ref>{{harvnb|Gruenbaum|2001|loc=[https://archive.org/details/femalecircumcisi0000grue/page/50 50]}}; Mackie and LeJeune (UNICEF) 2008, 8–9.</ref> FGM's origins in northeastern Africa are pre-Islamic, but the practice became associated with Islam because of that religion's focus on female chastity and seclusion.{{efn|Gerry Mackie, 1996: "FGM is pre-Islamic but was exaggerated by its intersection with the Islamic modesty code of family honor, female purity, virginity, chastity, fidelity, and seclusion."{{sfn|Mackie|1996|loc=1008}}}} According to a 2013 UNICEF report, in 18 African countries at least 10 percent of Muslim females had experienced FGM, and in 13 of those countries, the figure rose to 50–99 percent.<ref name="auto">UNICEF 2013, 175.</ref> There is no mention of the practice in the [[Religion:Quran|Quran]].{{sfn|Mackie|1996|loc=1004–1005}} It is praised in a few [[Religion:Hadith terminology|''daʻīf'']] (weak) ''[[Religion:Hadith|hadith]]'' (sayings attributed to Muhammad) as noble but not required,<ref>{{harvnb|Roald|2003|loc=224}}; {{harvnb|Asmani|Abdi|2008|loc=6–13}}.</ref>{{efn|Gerry Mackie, 1996: "The Koran is silent on FGM, but several ''hadith'' (sayings attributed to Mohammed) recommend attenuating the practice for the woman's sake, praise it as noble but not commanded, or advise that female converts refrain from mutilation because even if pleasing to the husband it is painful to the wife."{{sfn|Mackie|1996|loc=1004–1005}}}} although it is regarded as obligatory by the Shafi'i version of Sunni Islam.{{sfn|Roald|2003|loc=243}} In 2007 the [[Organization:Al-Azhar University#Council of Senior Scholars|Al-Azhar Supreme Council of Islamic Research]] in Cairo ruled that FGM had "no basis in core Islamic law or any of its partial provisions".<ref>UNICEF press release, 2 July 2007; UNICEF 2013, 70.</ref>{{efn|Maggie Michael, Associated Press, 2007: "[Egypt's] supreme religious authorities stressed that Islam is against female circumcision. It's prohibited, prohibited, prohibited," Grand Mufti Ali Gomaa said on the privately-owned al-Mahwar network."<ref>Michael, Maggie (29 June 2007). [https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/06/29/AR2007062901284.html "Egypt Officials Ban Female Circumcision"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170920162546/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/06/29/AR2007062901284.html |date=20 September 2017 }}, Associated Press, 2.</ref>}}

There is no mention of FGM in the [[Religion:Bible|Bible]].{{efn|Samuel Waje Kunhiyop, 2008: "Nowhere in all of Scripture or in any of recorded church history is there even a hint that women were to be circumcised."{{sfn|Kunhiyop|2008|loc=297}}}} Christian missionaries in Africa were among the first to object to FGM,{{sfn|Murray|1976}} but Christian communities in Africa do practise it. In 2013 UNICEF identified 19 African countries in which at least 10 percent of Christian women and girls aged 15 to 49 had undergone FGM;{{efn|The countries were Benin, Burkina Faso, Central African Republic, Chad, Cote d'Ivoire, Egypt, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Gambia, Guinea, Guinea Bissau, Kenya, Liberia, Mali, Niger, Nigeria, Sierra Leone, Sudan, and Tanzania.<ref>UNICEF 2013, p.&nbsp;73, figure 6.13.</ref>}} in Niger, 55 percent of Christian women and girls had experienced it, compared with two percent of their Muslim counterparts.<ref>UNICEF 2013, cover page and p.&nbsp;175.</ref> The only Jewish group known to have practised it is the Beta Israel of Ethiopia. Judaism requires male circumcision but does not allow FGM.<ref>{{harvnb|Cohen|2005|loc=[https://books.google.com/books?id=PmL-LogqJ-YC&pg=PA59 59]}}; {{harvnb|Berlin|2011|loc=[https://books.google.com/books?id=hKAaJXvUaUoC&pg=PA173 173]}}.</ref> FGM is also practised by [[Philosophy:Animism|animist]] groups, particularly in Guinea and Mali.<ref name="auto"/>
{{clear}}

==History==
===Antiquity===
{{quote box
|border=1px
|title=Spell 1117
|title_fnt=#555555
|halign=left
|quote=But if a man wants to know how to live, he should recite it [a magical spell] every day, after his flesh has been rubbed with the ''b3d'' [unknown substance] of an uncircumcised girl ['''m't''] and the flakes of skin [''šnft''] of an uncircumcised bald man.
|fontsize=95%
|bgcolor=#F9F9F9
|width=300px
|align=right
|quoted=
|salign=right
|style=margin–top:1.5em;margin-bottom:1.5em;padding:2.0em
|source=—From an [[History:Middle Kingdom of Egypt|Egyptian]] sarcophagus, c.&nbsp;1991–1786&nbsp;BCE{{sfn|Knight|2001|loc=330}}}}

The practice's origins are unknown. Gerry Mackie has suggested that, because FGM's east–west, north–south distribution in Africa meets in Sudan, infibulation may have begun there with the Meroite civilization (c.&nbsp;800 BCE&nbsp;– c.&nbsp;350 CE), before the rise of Islam, to increase confidence in paternity.{{sfn|Mackie|2000|loc=264, 267}} According to historian Mary Knight, Spell 1117 (c.&nbsp;1991–1786 BCE) of the Ancient Egyptian [[Religion:Coffin Texts|Coffin Texts]] may refer in [[Social:Egyptian hieroglyphs|hieroglyphs]] to an uncircumcised girl ('''m't''):

{{center|<hiero>a-m-a:X1-D53-B1</hiero>}}

The spell was found on the sarcophagus of Sit-hedjhotep, now in the [[Organization:Egyptian Museum|Egyptian Museum]], and dates to Egypt's [[History:Middle Kingdom of Egypt|Middle Kingdom]].{{sfn|Knight|2001|loc=330}}{{efn|Knight adds that Egyptologists are uncomfortable with the translation to ''uncircumcised'', because there is no information about what constituted the circumcised state.{{sfn|Knight|2001|loc=330}}}} (Paul F. O'Rourke argues that '''m't'' probably refers instead to a menstruating woman.){{sfn|O'Rourke|2007|loc=166ff (hieroglyphs), 172 (menstruating woman)}} The proposed circumcision of an Egyptian girl, Tathemis, is also mentioned on a Greek [[Engineering:Papyrus|papyrus]], from 163&nbsp;BCE, in the British Museum: "Sometime after this, Nephoris [Tathemis's mother] defrauded me, being anxious that it was time for Tathemis to be circumcised, as is the custom among the Egyptians."{{efn|"Sometime after this, Nephoris [Tathemis's mother] defrauded me, being anxious that it was time for Tathemis to be circumcised, as is the custom among the Egyptians. She asked that I give her 1,300 drachmae&nbsp;... to clothe her&nbsp;... and to provide her with a marriage dowry&nbsp;... if she didn't do each of these or if she did not circumcise Tathemis in the month of Mecheir, year 18 [163 BCE], she would repay me 2,400 drachmae on the spot."<ref>{{harvnb|Knight|2001|loc=329–330}}; {{harvnb|Kenyon|1893|[https://books.google.com/books?id=TiAcAQAAMAAJ&pg=PA31 31–32]}}.</ref>}}

The examination of mummies has shown no evidence of FGM. Citing the Australian pathologist Grafton Elliot Smith, who examined hundreds of mummies in the early 20th century, Knight writes that the genital area may resemble Type III because during mummification the skin of the outer labia was pulled toward the anus to cover the pudendal cleft, possibly to prevent a sexual violation. It was similarly not possible to determine whether Types I or II had been performed, because soft tissues had deteriorated or been removed by the embalmers.{{sfn|Knight|2001|loc=331}}

The Greek geographer Strabo (c. 64 BCE&nbsp;– c. 23 CE) wrote about FGM after visiting Egypt around 25 BCE: "This is one of the customs most zealously pursued by them [the Egyptians]: to raise every child that is born and to circumcise [''peritemnein''] the males and excise [''ektemnein''] the females&nbsp;..."<ref>Strabo, ''Geographica'', c.&nbsp;25&nbsp;BCE, cited in {{harvnb|Knight|2001|loc=318}}</ref>{{efn|Strabo, ''Geographica'', c.&nbsp;25&nbsp;BCE: "One of the customs most zealously observed among the Aegyptians is this, that they rear every child that is born, and circumcise [περιτέμνειν, ''peritemnein''] the males, and excise [''ektemnein''] the females, as is also customary among the Jews, who are also Aegyptians in origin, as I have already stated in my account of them."<ref>Strabo, ''Geographica'', [http://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Strabo/17B*.html#ref273 Book VII, chapter 2], 17.2.5. {{harvnb|Cohen|2005|loc=[https://books.google.com/books?id=PmL-LogqJ-YC&pg=PA59 59–61]}} argues that Strabo conflated the Jews with the Egyptians.</ref>{{pb}}
[http://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Strabo/16D*.html Book XVI, chapter 4], 16.4.9: "And then to the Harbour of Antiphilus, and, above this, to the Creophagi [meat-eaters], of whom the males have their sexual glands mutilated [''kolobos''] and the women are excised [''ektemnein''] in the Jewish fashion."}}{{efn|Knight 2001 writes that there is one extant reference from antiquity, from Xanthus of Lydia in the fifth century BCE, that may allude to FGM outside Egypt. Xanthus wrote, in a history of Lydia: "The Lydians arrived at such a state of delicacy that they were even the first to 'castrate' their women." Knight argues that the "castration", which is not described, may have kept women youthful, in the sense of allowing the Lydian king to have intercourse with them without pregnancy. Knight concludes that it may have been a reference to sterilization, not FGM.{{sfn|Knight|2001|loc=326}}}} [[Biography:Philo|Philo of Alexandria]] (c. 20 BCE&nbsp;– 50 CE) also made reference to it: "the Egyptians by the custom of their country circumcise the marriageable youth and maid in the fourteenth (year) of their age when the male begins to get seed, and the female to have a menstrual flow."{{sfn|Knight|2001|loc=333}} It is mentioned briefly in a work attributed to the Greek physician [[Biography:Galen|Galen]] (129&nbsp;– c.&nbsp;200 CE): "When [the clitoris] sticks out to a great extent in their young women, Egyptians consider it appropriate to cut it out."{{efn|Knight adds that the attribution to Galen is suspect.{{sfn|Knight|2001|loc=336}}}} Another Greek physician, Aëtius of Amida (mid-5th to mid-6th century CE), offered more detail in book 16 of his ''Sixteen Books on Medicine'', citing the physician Philomenes. The procedure was performed in case the clitoris, or ''nymphê'', grew too large or triggered sexual desire when rubbing against clothing. "On this account, it seemed proper to the Egyptians to remove it before it became greatly enlarged," Aëtius wrote, "especially at that time when the girls were about to be married":

{{blockquote|The surgery is performed in this way: Have the girl sit on a chair while a muscled young man standing behind her places his arms below the girl's thighs. Have him separate and steady her legs and whole body. Standing in front and taking hold of the clitoris with a broad-mouthed forceps in his left hand, the surgeon stretches it outward, while with the right hand, he cuts it off at the point next to the pincers of the forceps. It is proper to let a length remain from that cut off, about the size of the membrane that's between the nostrils, so as to take away the excess material only; as I have said, the part to be removed is at that point just above the pincers of the forceps. Because the clitoris is a skinlike structure and stretches out excessively, do not cut off too much, as a urinary fistula may result from cutting such large growths too deeply.{{sfn|Knight|2001|loc=327–328}}}}

The genital area was then cleaned with a sponge, [[Biology:Frankincense|frankincense]] powder and wine or cold water, and wrapped in linen bandages dipped in vinegar, until the seventh day when [[Chemistry:Calamine|calamine]], rose petals, date pits, or a "genital powder made from baked clay" might be applied.{{sfn|Knight|2001|loc=328}}

===Red Sea slave trade===
Whatever the practice's origins, infibulation became linked to slavery. Research has indicated that linkes between the Red Sea slave trade and female genital mutilation.<ref name="ssrn.com">Corno, Lucia and La Ferrara, Eliana and Voena, Alessandra, Female Genital Cutting and the Slave Trade (December 2020). CEPR Discussion Paper No. DP15577, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3753982</ref> 
An investigation combining contemporary from data on slave shipments from 1400 to 1900 with data from 28 African countries has found that women belonging to ethnic groups historically victimized by the Red Sea slave trade were "significantly" more likely to suffer genital mutilation in the 21st-century, as well as "more in favour of continuing the practice".<ref name="ssrn.com"/><ref name="telegraph.co.uk">{{cite news | url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/global-health/women-and-girls/female-genital-mutilation-red-sea-slave-trade-route/ | title=Female genital mutilation linked to Red Sea slave trade route | newspaper=The Telegraph | date=11 September 2023 | last1=Barber | first1=Harriet }}</ref>
Women trafficked in the Red Sea slave trade were sold as concubines (sex slaves) in the Islamic Middle East up until as late as in the mid 20th-century, and the practice of infibulation was used to temporarily signal the virginity of girls, increasing their value on the slave market: "According to descriptions by early travellers, infibulated female slaves had a higher price on the market because infibulation was thought to ensure chastity and loyalty to the owner and prevented undesired pregnancies".<ref name="ssrn.com"/><ref name="telegraph.co.uk"/>
Mackie cites the Portuguese missionary João dos Santos, who in 1609 wrote of a group near Mogadishu who had a "custome to sew up their Females, especially their slaves being young to make them unable for conception, which makes these slaves sell dearer, both for their chastitie, and for better confidence which their Masters put in them". Thus, Mackie argues, a "practice associated with shameful female slavery came to stand for honor".{{sfn|Mackie|1996|loc=1003, 1009}}

===Europe and the United States===
[[File:Isaac Baker Brown.jpg|thumb|left|alt=portrait|Isaac Baker Brown "set to work to remove the clitoris whenever he had the opportunity of doing so".<ref name=Allen2000p106/>]]
Some gynaecologists in 19th-century Europe and the United States removed the clitoris to treat insanity and masturbation.{{sfn|Rodriguez|2008}} A British doctor, Robert Thomas, suggested clitoridectomy as a cure for nymphomania in 1813.<ref>{{harvnb|Thomas|1813|loc=[https://books.google.com/books?id=yK9YAAAAcAAJ&pg=PA585 585–586]}}; {{harvnb|Shorter|2008|loc=[https://books.google.com/books?id=I87S-xL6Q1wC&pg=PA82 82]}}.</ref> In 1825 ''The Lancet'' described a clitoridectomy performed in 1822 in Berlin by Karl Ferdinand von Graefe on a 15-year-old girl who was masturbating excessively.<ref>{{harvnb|Elchalal|Ben-Ami|Gillis|Brzezinski|1997}}; {{harvnb|Shorter|2008|loc=[https://books.google.com/books?id=I87S-xL6Q1wC&pg=PA82 82]}}.</ref>

Isaac Baker Brown, an English gynaecologist, president of the Medical Society of London and co-founder in 1845 of St. Mary's Hospital, believed that masturbation, or "unnatural irritation" of the clitoris, caused [[Unsolved:Female hysteria|hysteria]], spinal irritation, fits, idiocy, mania, and death.{{sfn|Elchalal|Ben-Ami|Gillis|Brzezinski|1997}} He, therefore "set to work to remove the clitoris whenever he had the opportunity of doing so", according to his obituary.<ref name=Allen2000p106>{{harvnb|J. F. C.|1873|loc=[https://books.google.com/books?id=gZ4EAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA155 155]}}, cited in {{harvnb|Allen|2000|loc=[https://archive.org/details/wagesofsinsexdis00alle/page/106 106].}}</ref> Brown performed several clitoridectomies between 1859 and 1866.<ref name=Allen2000p106/> In the United States, J. Marion Sims followed Brown's work and in 1862 slit the [[Medicine:Cervix|neck of a woman's uterus]] and amputated her clitoris, "for the relief of the nervous or hysterical condition as recommended by Baker Brown".{{sfn|McGregor|1998|loc=146}} When Brown published his views in ''On the Curability of Certain Forms of Insanity, Epilepsy, Catalepsy, and Hysteria in Females'' (1866), doctors in London accused him of quackery and expelled him from the Obstetrical Society.<ref>{{harvnb|Sheehan|1981|loc=14}}; {{harvnb|Black|1997|loc=405}}.</ref>

Later in the 19th century, A. J. Bloch, a surgeon in New Orleans, removed the clitoris of a two-year-old girl who was reportedly masturbating.{{sfn|Hoberman|2005|loc=[https://archive.org/details/testosteronedrea00hobe/page/63 63]}} According to a 1985 paper in the ''Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey'', clitoridectomy was performed in the United States into the 1960s to treat hysteria, erotomania and lesbianism.<ref>{{harvnb|Cutner|1985}}, cited in {{harvnb|Nour|2008}}. Also see {{harvnb|Barker-Benfield|1999|loc=[https://books.google.com/books?id=0QKUAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA113 113]}}.</ref> From the mid-1950s, James C. Burt, a gynaecologist in Dayton, Ohio, performed non-standard repairs of episiotomies after childbirth, adding more stitches to make the vaginal opening smaller. From 1966 until 1989, he performed "love surgery" by cutting women's pubococcygeus muscle, repositioning the vagina and urethra, and removing the clitoral hood, thereby making their genital area more appropriate, in his view, for intercourse in the missionary position.{{sfn|Rodriguez|2014|loc=149–153}} "Women are structurally inadequate for intercourse," he wrote; he said he would turn them into "horny little mice".<ref>{{cite news|last1=Wilkerson|first1=Isabel|title=Charges Against Doctor Bring Ire and Questions|url=https://www.nytimes.com/1988/12/11/us/charges-against-doctor-bring-ire-and-questions.html|work=The New York Times|date=11 December 1988|access-date=10 February 2018|archive-date=16 August 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090816081427/http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?sec=health|url-status=live}}{{pb}}
{{cite news|last1=Donaldson James|first1=Susan|title=Ohio Woman Still Scarred By 'Love' Doctor's Sex Surgery|url=http://abcnews.go.com/Health/ohio-woman-writes-book-love-doctor-mutilated-sex/story?id=17897317|work=ABC News|date=13 December 2012|ref=none|access-date=6 February 2018|archive-date=6 August 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200806025518/https://abcnews.go.com/Health/ohio-woman-writes-book-love-doctor-mutilated-sex/story?id=17897317|url-status=live}}</ref> In the 1960s and 1970s he performed these procedures without consent while repairing episiotomies and performing hysterectomies and other surgery; he said he had performed a variation of them on 4,000 women by 1975.{{sfn|Rodriguez|2014|loc=149–153}} Following complaints, he was required in 1989 to stop practicing medicine in the United States.<ref>{{cite news|title=Doctor Loses Practice Over Genital Surgery|work=The New York Times |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1989/01/26/us/doctor-loses-practice-over-genital-surgery.html|agency=Associated Press|date=26 January 1989|access-date=10 February 2018|archive-date=31 August 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200831233712/https://www.nytimes.com/1989/01/26/us/doctor-loses-practice-over-genital-surgery.html|url-status=live}}</ref>

==Opposition and legal status==

===Colonial opposition in Kenya===
{{Paragraph break}}
{{quote box
|border=1px
|title=''Muthirigu''
|title_fnt=#555555
|halign=left
|quote=<poem>
Little knives in their sheaths
That they may fight with the church,
The time has come.
Elders (of the church)
When Kenyatta comes
You will be given women's clothes
And you will have to cook him his food.</poem>
|fontsize=95%
|bgcolor=#F9F9F9
|width=300px
|align=right
|quoted=
|salign=right
|style=margin–top:1.5em;margin-bottom:1.5em;padding:2em
|source= — From the ''Muthirigu'' (1929), Kikuyu dance-songs against church opposition to FGM<ref>Kenneth Mufuka, [https://web.archive.org/web/20111123065512/http://www.irss.uoguelph.ca/article/viewFile/176/218 "Scottish Missionaries and the Circumcision Controversy in Kenya, 1900–1960"], ''International Review of Scottish Studies'', 28, 2003, 55.</ref>
}}
Protestant missionaries in British East Africa (present-day Kenya) began campaigning against FGM in the early 20th century, when Dr. John Arthur joined the Church of Scotland Mission (CSM) in Kikuyu. An important ethnic marker, the practice was known by the Kikuyu, the country's main ethnic group, as ''irua'' for both girls and boys. It involved excision (Type II) for girls and removal of the foreskin for boys. Unexcised Kikuyu women (''irugu'') were outcasts.<ref>{{harvnb|Thomas|2000|loc=[https://books.google.com/books?id=rhhRXiJIGEcC&pg=PA132 132]}}. For ''irua'', {{harvnb|Kenyatta|1962|loc=129}}; for ''irugu'' as outcasts, {{harvnb|Kenyatta|1962|loc=127}}. Also see {{harvnb|Zabus|2008|loc=[https://books.google.com/books?id=xZmWF3qxHo4C&pg=PA48 48]}}.</ref>

Jomo Kenyatta, general secretary of the Kikuyu Central Association and later Kenya's first prime minister, wrote in 1938 that, for the Kikuyu, the institution of FGM was the "''[[Philosophy:Sine qua non|conditio sine qua non]]'' of the whole teaching of tribal law, religion and morality". No proper Kikuyu man or woman would marry or have sexual relations with someone who was not circumcised, he wrote. A woman's responsibilities toward the tribe began with her initiation. Her age and place within tribal history were traced to that day, and the group of girls with whom she was cut was named according to current events, an [[Social:Oral tradition|oral tradition]] that allowed the Kikuyu to track people and events going back hundreds of years.{{sfn|Kenyatta|1962|loc=127–130}}

[[File:Hulda Stumpf, Africa Inland Mission conference.jpg|thumb|left|alt=photograph|Hulda Stumpf ''(bottom left)'' was murdered in Kikuyu in 1930 after opposing FGM.]]

Beginning with the CSM in 1925, several missionary churches declared that FGM was prohibited for African Christians; the CSM announced that Africans practising it would be excommunicated, which resulted in hundreds leaving or being expelled.{{sfn|Fiedler|1996|loc=75}} In 1929 the Kenya Missionary Council began referring to FGM as the "sexual mutilation of women", and a person's stance toward the practice became a test of loyalty, either to the Christian churches or to the Kikuyu Central Association.<ref>{{harvnb|Thomas|2000|loc=132}}; for the "sexual mutilation of women", {{harvnb|Karanja|2009|loc=[https://books.google.com/books?id=F1ezIgyomGIC&pg=PA93 93], n.&nbsp;631}}. Also see {{harvnb|Strayer|Murray|1978|loc=[https://books.google.com/books?id=9kpLvKnZCR8C&pg=PA139 139ff]}}.</ref> The stand-off turned FGM into a focal point of the Kenyan independence movement; the 1929–1931 period is known in the country's historiography as the female circumcision controversy.<ref>{{harvnb|Boddy|2007|loc=[https://books.google.com/books?id=T77ui7IPNwkC&pg=PA241 241–245]}}; {{harvnb|Hyam|1990|loc=196}}; {{harvnb|Murray|1976|loc=92–104}}.</ref> When Hulda Stumpf, an American missionary who opposed FGM in the girls' school she helped to run, was murdered in 1930, Edward Grigg, the governor of Kenya, told the British Colonial Office that the killer had tried to circumcise her.<ref>{{harvnb|Boddy|2007|loc=[https://books.google.com/books?id=T77ui7IPNwkC&pg=PA241 241], [https://books.google.com/books?id=T77ui7IPNwkC&pg=PA241 244]}}; {{harvnb|Robert|1996|loc=[https://books.google.com/books?id=98eI044RjlwC&pg=PA230 230]}}.</ref>

There was some opposition from Kenyan women themselves. At the mission in Tumutumu, Karatina, where Marion Scott Stevenson worked, a group calling themselves ''Ngo ya Tuiritu'' ("Shield of Young Girls"), the membership of which included Raheli Warigia (mother of Gakaara wa Wanjaũ), wrote to the Local Native Council of South Nyeri on 25 December 1931: "[W]e of the Ngo ya Tuiritu heard that there are men who talk of female circumcision, and we get astonished because they (men) do not give birth and feel the pain and even some die and even others become infertile, and the main cause is circumcision. Because of that, the issue of circumcision should not be forced. People are caught like sheep; one should be allowed to cut her own way of either agreeing to be circumcised or not without being dictated on one's own body."<ref>{{harvnb|wa Kihurani|Warigia wa Johanna|Murigo wa Meshak|2007|loc=118–120}}; {{harvnb|Peterson|2012|loc=217}}.</ref>

Elsewhere, support for the practice from women was strong. In 1956 in Meru, eastern Kenya, when the council of male elders (the ''Njuri Nchecke'') announced a ban on FGM in 1956, thousands of girls cut each other's genitals with razor blades over the next three years as a symbol of defiance. The movement came to be known as ''Ngaitana'' ("I will circumcise myself"), because to avoid naming their friends the girls said they had cut themselves. Historian Lynn Thomas described the episode as significant in the history of FGM because it made clear that its victims were also its perpetrators.<ref>{{harvnb|Thomas|2000|loc=[https://books.google.com/books?id=rhhRXiJIGEcC&pg=PA129 129–131] (131 for the girls as "central actors")}}; also in {{harvnb|Thomas|1996}} and {{harvnb|Thomas|2003|loc=89–91}}.</ref> FGM was eventually outlawed in Kenya in 2001, although the practice continued, reportedly driven by older women.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Topping |first1=Alexandra |title=Kenyan girls taken to remote regions to undergo FGM in secret |url=https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2014/jul/24/kenya-girls-female-genital-mutilation-fgm-secret |work=The Guardian |date=24 July 2014 |access-date=17 January 2019 |archive-date=31 July 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200731055249/https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2014/jul/24/kenya-girls-female-genital-mutilation-fgm-secret |url-status=live }}</ref>

===Growth of opposition===
One of the earliest campaigns against FGM began in Egypt in the 1920s, when the Egyptian Doctors' Society called for a ban.{{efn|UNICEF 2013 calls the Egyptian Doctors' Society opposition the "first known campaign" against FGM.<ref>UNICEF 2013, 10.</ref>}} There was a parallel campaign in Sudan, run by religious leaders and British women. Infibulation was banned there in 1946, but the law was unpopular and barely enforced.{{sfn|Boddy|2007|loc=[https://books.google.com/books?id=T77ui7IPNwkC&pg=PA202 202], 299}}{{efn|Some states in Sudan banned FGM in 2008–2009, but {{as of|2013|lc=y}}, there was no national legislation.<ref>UNICEF 2013, 2, 9.</ref> The prevalence of FGM among women aged 14–49 was 89 percent in 2014.{{sfn|Elduma|2018}}}} The Egyptian government banned infibulation in state-run hospitals in 1959, but allowed partial clitoridectomy if parents requested it.{{sfn|Boyle|2002|loc=92, 103}} (Egypt banned FGM entirely in 2007.)

In 1959, the UN asked the WHO to investigate FGM, but the latter responded that it was not a medical matter.{{sfn|Boyle|2002|loc=41}} Feminists took up the issue throughout the 1970s.{{sfn|Bagnol|Mariano|2011|loc=281}} The Egyptian physician and feminist Nawal El Saadawi criticized FGM in her book ''Women and Sex'' (1972); the book was banned in Egypt and El Saadawi lost her job as director-general of public health.<ref name=Khaleeli2010>{{harvnb|Gruenbaum|2001|loc=22}}; Khaleeli, Homa (15 April 2010). [https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2010/apr/15/nawal-el-saadawi-egyptian-feminist "Nawal El Saadawi: Egypt's radical feminist"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150926003949/http://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2010/apr/15/nawal-el-saadawi-egyptian-feminist |date=26 September 2015 }}, ''The Guardian''.</ref> She followed up with a chapter, "The Circumcision of Girls", in her book ''The Hidden Face of Eve: Women in the Arab World'' (1980), which described her own clitoridectomy when she was six years old:

{{blockquote|I did not know what they had cut off from my body, and I did not try to find out. I just wept, and called out to my mother for help. But the worst shock of all was when I looked around and found her standing by my side. Yes, it was her, I could not be mistaken, in flesh and blood, right in the midst of these strangers, talking to them and smiling at them, as though they had not participated in slaughtering her daughter just a few moments ago.{{sfn|El Saadawi|2007|loc=[https://books.google.com/books?id=u5n9zUZuVI8C&pg=PA14 14]}}}}

[[File:Edna Adan Ismail.jpg|thumb|upright|left|alt=photograph|Edna Adan Ismail raised the health consequences of FGM in 1977.]]
In 1975, Rose Oldfield Hayes, an American social scientist, became the first female academic to publish a detailed account of FGM, aided by her ability to discuss it directly with women in Sudan. Her article in ''American Ethnologist'' called it "female genital mutilation", rather than female circumcision, and brought it to wider academic attention.{{sfn|Hayes|1975|loc=21}} Edna Adan Ismail, who worked at the time for the Somalia Ministry of Health, discussed the health consequences of FGM in 1977 with the Somali Women's Democratic Organization.{{sfn|Abdalla|2007|loc=[https://books.google.com/books?id=8VQxt634pfcC&pg=PA201 201]}}<ref>Topping, Alexandra (23 June 2014). [https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jun/23/somaliland-womens-rights-gender-violence "Somaliland's leading lady for women's rights: 'It is time for men to step up'"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170101055842/https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jun/23/somaliland-womens-rights-gender-violence |date=1 January 2017 }}, ''The Guardian''.</ref> Two years later Fran Hosken, an Austrian-American feminist, published ''The Hosken Report: Genital and Sexual Mutilation of Females'' (1979),{{sfn|Hosken|1994}} the first to offer global figures. She estimated that 110,529,000 women in 20 African countries had experienced FGM.{{sfn|Yoder|Khan|2008|loc=2}} The figures were speculative but consistent with later surveys.{{sfn|Mackie|2003|loc=139}} Describing FGM as a "training ground for male violence", Hosken accused female practitioners of "participating in the destruction of their own kind".{{sfn|Hosken|1994|loc=5}} The language caused a rift between Western and African feminists; African women boycotted a session featuring Hosken during the UN's Mid-Decade Conference on Women in Copenhagen in July 1980.<ref>{{harvnb|Boyle|2002|loc=47}}; {{harvnb|Bagnol|Mariano|2011|loc=281}}.</ref>

In 1979, the WHO held a seminar, "Traditional Practices Affecting the Health of Women and Children", in Khartoum, Sudan, and in 1981, also in Khartoum, 150 academics and activists signed a pledge to fight FGM after a workshop held by the Babiker Badri Scientific Association for Women's Studies (BBSAWS), "Female Circumcision Mutilates and Endangers Women&nbsp;– Combat it!" Another BBSAWS workshop in 1984 invited the international community to write a joint statement for the United Nations.<ref>Shahira Ahmed, "Babiker Badri Scientific Association for Women's Studies", in Abusharaf 2007, 176–180.</ref> It recommended that the "goal of all African women" should be the eradication of FGM and that, to sever the link between FGM and religion, clitoridectomy should no longer be referred to as ''sunna''.<ref>Ahmed 2007, 180.</ref>

The Inter-African Committee on Traditional Practices Affecting the Health of Women and Children, founded in 1984 in Dakar, Senegal, called for an end to the practice, as did the UN's World Conference on Human Rights in Vienna in 1993. The conference listed FGM as a form of [[Social:Violence against women|violence against women]], marking it as a human-rights violation, rather than a medical issue.<ref>Anika Rahman and Nahid Toubia, ''Female Genital Mutilation: A Guide to Laws and Policies Worldwide'', New York: Zed Books, 2000, [https://books.google.com/books?id=kEG6GaudxQEC&pg=PA110 10–11] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200801123412/https://books.google.com/books?id=kEG6GaudxQEC&pg=PA110 |date=1 August 2020 }}; for Vienna, UNICEF 2013, 8.</ref> Throughout the 1990s and 2000s governments in Africa and the Middle East passed legislation banning or restricting FGM. In 2003 the African Union ratified the Maputo Protocol on the rights of women, which supported the elimination of FGM.<ref>Emma Bonino, [https://www.nytimes.com/2004/09/15/opinion/15iht-edbonino_ed3_.html "A brutal custom: Join forces to banish the mutilation of women"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150531165453/http://www.nytimes.com/2004/09/15/opinion/15iht-edbonino_ed3_.html |date=31 May 2015 }}, ''The New York Times'', 15 September 2004; [https://web.archive.org/web/20110409114818/http://www.africa-union.org/root/au/Documents/Treaties/Text/Protocol%20on%20the%20Rights%20of%20Women.pdf Maputo Protocol], 7–8.</ref> By 2015 laws restricting FGM had been passed in at least 23 of the 27 African countries in which it is concentrated, although several fell short of a ban.{{efn|For example, UNICEF 2013 lists Mauritania as having passed legislation against FGM, but (as of that year) it was banned only from being conducted in government facilities or by medical personnel.<ref name=UNICEF2013p8>UNICEF 2013, 8.</ref>{{pb}}The following are countries in which FGM is common and in which restrictions are in place as of 2013. An asterisk indicates a ban:{{pb}}Benin (2003), Burkina Faso (1996*), Central African Republic (1966, amended 1996), Chad (2003), Côte d'Ivoire (1998), Djibouti (1995, amended 2009*), Egypt (2008*), Eritrea (2007*), Ethiopia (2004*), Ghana (1994, amended 2007), Guinea (1965, amended 2000*), Guinea-Bissau (2011*), Iraq (2011*), Kenya (2001, amended 2011*), Mauritania (2005), Niger (2003), Nigeria (2015*), Senegal (1999*), Somalia (2012*), Sudan, some states (2008–2009), Tanzania (1998), Togo (1998), Uganda (2010*), Yemen (2001*).<ref>UNICEF 2013, 8–9.</ref><ref>UNFPA–UNICEF Annual Report 2012, 12.</ref>}}

{{As of|2023}}, UNICEF reported that "in most countries in Africa and the Middle East with representative data on attitudes (23 out of 30), the majority of girls and women think the practice should end", and that "even among communities that practice FGM, there is substantial opposition to its continuation".<ref name=UNICEF2023/>

===United Nations{{anchor|UN}}===
[[File:Female genital mutilation laws by country map.svg|300px|thumb|[[Female genital mutilation laws by country]]:
{{legend|#008000|Specific criminal provision or national law prohibiting FGM}}
{{legend|#00FF00|General criminal provision that might be used to prosecute FGM}}
{{legend|#EEEE00|Partial or subnational FGM criminalisation, or unclear legal status}}
{{legend|#FF0000|FGM not criminalised}}
{{legend|#C0C0C0|No data}}]]
In December 1993, the United Nations General Assembly included FGM in resolution 48/104, the Declaration on the Elimination of Violence Against Women, and from 2003 sponsored International Day of Zero Tolerance for Female Genital Mutilation, held every 6 February.<ref>[http://www.un.org/documents/ga/res/48/a48r104.htm "48/104. Declaration on the Elimination of Violence against Women"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060202074847/http://www.un.org/documents/ga/res/48/a48r104.htm |date=2 February 2006 }}, United Nations General Assembly, 20 December 1993.</ref><ref>Charlotte Feldman-Jacobs, [http://www.prb.org/Articles/2009/fgmc.aspx "Commemorating International Day of Zero Tolerance to Female Genital Mutilation"] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100213125942/http://www.prb.org/Articles/2009/fgmc.aspx |date=13 February 2010 }}, Population Reference Bureau, February 2009.</ref> UNICEF began in 2003 to promote an evidence-based [[Philosophy:Social norms approach|social norms approach]], using ideas from [[Game theory|game theory]] about how communities reach decisions about FGM, and building on the work of Gerry Mackie on the demise of footbinding in China.<ref>UNICEF 2013, 15; UNICEF 2010.</ref> In 2005 the UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre in Florence published its first report on FGM.<ref name=UNICEF2005/> UNFPA and UNICEF launched a joint program in Africa in 2007 to reduce FGM by 40 percent within the 0–15 age group and eliminate it from at least one country by 2012, goals that were not met and which they later described as unrealistic.<ref name="UNFPA–UNICEF2013">UNFPA 2013, "Executive Summary", 4.</ref>{{efn|Fifteen countries joined the program: Djibouti, Egypt, Ethiopia, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Kenya, Senegal and Sudan in 2008; Burkina Faso, Gambia, Uganda and Somalia in 2009; and Eritrea, Mali and Mauritania in 2011.<ref>UNFPA 2013, Volume 1, viii.</ref>}} In 2008 several UN bodies recognized FGM as a human-rights violation,<ref>WHO 2008, 8.</ref> and in 2010 the UN called upon healthcare providers to stop carrying out the procedures, including reinfibulation after childbirth and symbolic nicking.<ref name=UN2010Askew/> In 2012 the General Assembly passed resolution 67/146, "Intensifying global efforts for the elimination of female genital mutilations".<ref name=UN>UN resolution, 20 December 2012; Emma Bonino, [https://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/20/opinion/global/banning-female-genital-mutilation.html "Banning Female Genital Mutilation"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170101060201/http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/20/opinion/global/banning-female-genital-mutilation.html |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220102/http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/20/opinion/global/banning-female-genital-mutilation.html |archive-date=2022-01-02 |url-access=limited |url-status=live |date=1 January 2017 }}{{cbignore}}, ''The New York Times'', 19 December 2012.</ref>

===Non-practising countries===
====Overview====
Immigration spread the practice to Australia, New Zealand, Europe, and North America, all of which outlawed it entirely or restricted it to consenting adults.<ref>Australia: [http://www.ag.gov.au/Publications/Documents/ReviewofAustraliasfemalegenitalmutilationlegalframework/Review%20of%20Australias%20female%20genital%20mutilation%20legal%20framework.pdf "Review of Australia's Female Genital Mutilation Legal Framework"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160305202920/https://www.ag.gov.au/Publications/Documents/ReviewofAustraliasfemalegenitalmutilationlegalframework/Review%20of%20Australias%20female%20genital%20mutilation%20legal%20framework.pdf |date=5 March 2016 }}, Attorney General's Department, Government of Australia.{{pb}}
New Zealand: [http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1961/0043/latest/DLM329734.html#DLM329734 "Section 204A&nbsp;– Female genital mutilation&nbsp;– Crimes Act 1961"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111123061721/http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1961/0043/latest/DLM329734.html#DLM329734 |date=23 November 2011 }}, New Zealand Parliamentary Counsel Office.{{pb}}
Europe: [http://ec.europa.eu/justice/gender-equality/gender-violence/eliminating-female-genital-mutilation/index_en.htm "Eliminating female genital mutilation"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140808183953/http://ec.europa.eu/justice/gender-equality/gender-violence/eliminating-female-genital-mutilation/index_en.htm |date=8 August 2014 }}, European Commission.{{pb}}
United States: [http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/116 "18 U.S. Code § 116 – Female genital mutilation"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140803012933/http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/116 |date=3 August 2014 }}, Legal Information Institute, Cornell University Law School.{{pb}}
Canada: [http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/C-46/section-268.html Section 268], Criminal Code, Justice Laws website, Government of Canada.</ref> Sweden outlawed FGM in 1982 with the ''Act Prohibiting the Genital Mutilation of Women'', the first Western country to do so.<ref name=EigeSweden>[http://eige.europa.eu/sites/default/files/documents/current_situation_and_trends_of_female_genital_mutilation_in_sweden_en.pdf "Current situation of female genital mutilation in Sweden"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170319112455/http://eige.europa.eu/sites/default/files/documents/current_situation_and_trends_of_female_genital_mutilation_in_sweden_en.pdf |date=19 March 2017 }}, European Institute for Gender Equality, European Union.</ref> Several former colonial powers, including Belgium, Britain, France, and the Netherlands, introduced new laws or made clear that it was covered by existing legislation.{{sfn|Boyle|2002|loc=97}} {{As of|2013}}, legislation banning FGM had been passed in 33 countries outside Africa and the Middle East.<ref name=UNICEF2013p8/>

====North America====
In the United States, an estimated 513,000 women and girls had experienced FGM or were at risk as of 2012.<ref name=CDC2016>[http://www.publichealthreports.org/documents/fgmutilation.pdf "Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting in the United States: Updated Estimates of Women and Girls at Risk, 2012"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171221153549/http://www.publichealthreports.org/documents/fgmutilation.pdf |date=21 December 2017 }}. ''Public Health Reports''. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. March–April 2016, 131.</ref><ref>Turkewitz, Julie (6 February 2015). [https://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/06/us/genital-cutting-cases-seen-more-as-immigration-rises.html "Effects of Ancient Custom Present New Challenge to U.S. Doctors: Genital Cutting Cases Seen More as Immigration Rises"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180131004639/https://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/06/us/genital-cutting-cases-seen-more-as-immigration-rises.html |date=31 January 2018 }}. ''The New York Times''.</ref>{{efn|The Centers for Disease Control's previous estimate was 168,000 as of 1990.{{sfn|Jones|Smith|Kieke|Wilcox|1997|loc=372}}}} A Nigerian woman successfully contested deportation in March 1994, asking for "cultural asylum" on the grounds that her young daughters (who were American citizens) might be cut if she took them to Nigeria,<ref>Rudloff, Patricia Dysart (1995). [https://web.archive.org/web/20010220043053/http://www.law-lib.utoronto.ca/Diana/fulltext/rudl.htm "In Re: Oluloro: Risk of female genital mutilation as 'extreme hardship' in immigration proceedings"]. ''Saint Mary's Law Journal'', 877.{{pb}}
{{Cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/1994/03/04/us/an-ancient-ritual-and-a-mother-s-asylum-plea.html|title=An Ancient Ritual and a Mother's Asylum Plea|last=Egan|first=Timothy|date=4 March 1994|work=The New York Times|access-date=28 November 2019|archive-date=3 September 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200903094757/https://www.nytimes.com/1994/03/04/us/an-ancient-ritual-and-a-mother-s-asylum-plea.html|url-status=live}}</ref> and in 1996 Fauziya Kasinga from Togo became the first to be officially granted asylum to escape FGM.<ref>Dugger, Celia W. (16 June 1996). [https://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C05E1DB1439F935A25755C0A960958260 "June 9–15; Asylum From Mutilation"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200621232551/https://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html%3Fres%3D9C05E1DB1439F935A25755C0A960958260 |date=21 June 2020 }}. ''The New York Times''.{{pb}}
[https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/eoir/legacy/2000/03/28/kasinga7.pdf "In re Fauziya KASINGA, file A73 476 695"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170304040921/https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/eoir/legacy/2000/03/28/kasinga7.pdf |date=4 March 2017 }}. U.S. Department of Justice. Executive Office for Immigration Review, decided 13 June 1996.</ref> In 1996 the Federal Prohibition of Female Genital Mutilation Act made it illegal to perform FGM on minors for non-medical reasons, and in 2013 the Transport for Female Genital Mutilation Act prohibited transporting a minor out of the country for the purpose of FGM.<ref name=CDC2016/>{{rp|2}} The first FGM conviction in the US was in 2006, when Khalid Adem, who had emigrated from Ethiopia, was sentenced to ten years for aggravated battery and cruelty to children after severing his two-year-old daughter's clitoris with a pair of scissors.<ref>[http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/nation/2006-11-01-georgia_x.htm "Man gets 10-year sentence for circumcision of 2-year-old daughter"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170902134855/http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/nation/2006-11-01-georgia_x.htm |date=2 September 2017 }}. Associated Press, 1 November 2006.</ref> A federal judge ruled in 2018 that the 1996 Act was unconstitutional, arguing that FGM is a "local criminal activity" that should be regulated by states.<ref name=Schmidt21Nov2018>Schmidt, Samantha (21 November 2018). [https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/social-issues/judge-rules-that-federal-law-banning-female-genital-mutilation-is-unconstitutional/2018/11/21/a9455728-edd2-11e8-96d4-0d23f2aaad09_story.html "Judge rules that federal law banning female genital mutilation is unconstitutional"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200820223532/https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/social-issues/judge-rules-that-federal-law-banning-female-genital-mutilation-is-unconstitutional/2018/11/21/a9455728-edd2-11e8-96d4-0d23f2aaad09_story.html |date=20 August 2020 }}. ''The Washington Post''.</ref>{{efn|The judge made his ruling during a case against members of the [[Religion:Dawoodi Bohra|Dawoodi Bohra]] community in Michigan accused of carrying out FGM.<ref name=Schmidt21Nov2018/>}} Twenty-four states had legislation banning FGM as of 2016,<ref name=CDC2016/>{{rp|2}} and in 2021 the STOP FGM Act of 2020 was signed into federal law.<ref>Batha, Emma (7 January 2021). [https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-law-fgm/us-toughens-ban-on-abhorrent-female-genital-mutilation-idUSKBN29C2OF "U.S. toughens ban on 'abhorrent' female genital mutilation"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210108140215/https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-law-fgm/us-toughens-ban-on-abhorrent-female-genital-mutilation-idUSKBN29C2OF |date=8 January 2021 }}. Reuters.</ref> The American Academy of Pediatrics opposes all forms of the practice, including pricking the clitoral skin.{{efn|In 2010 the American Academy of Pediatrics suggested that "pricking or incising the clitoral skin" was a harmless procedure that might satisfy parents, but it withdrew the statement after complaints.<ref>{{cite journal|url=http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/102/1/153.full|title=Female Genital Mutilation|journal=Pediatrics|volume=102|issue=1|date=1 July 1998|pages=153–156|doi=10.1542/peds.102.1.153|pmid=9651425|doi-access=free|access-date=22 October 2016|archive-date=18 February 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130218221435/http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/102/1/153.full|url-status=live}}{{pb}}
Withdrawn policy: {{cite journal|url=http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/125/5/1088.full|title=Ritual Genital Cutting of Female Minors|journal=Pediatrics|volume=125|issue=5|date=1 May 2010|pages=1088–1093|pmid=20421257|doi=10.1542/peds.2010-0187|doi-access=free|author1=American Academy of Pediatrics Board of Directors|access-date=27 October 2014|archive-date=20 October 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141020034936/http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/125/5/1088.full|url-status=live}}{{pb}}
Pam Belluck, [https://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/07/health/policy/07cuts.html "Group Backs Ritual 'Nick' as Female Circumcision Option"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180118095546/http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/07/health/policy/07cuts.html |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220102/http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/07/health/policy/07cuts.html |archive-date=2022-01-02 |url-access=limited |url-status=live |date=18 January 2018 }}{{cbignore}}, ''The New York Times'', 6 May 2010.</ref>}}

Canada recognized FGM as a form of persecution in July 1994, when it granted refugee status to Khadra Hassan Farah, who had fled Somalia to avoid her daughter being cut.<ref name=Farnsworth1994>Farnsworth, Clyde H. (21 July 1994). [https://www.nytimes.com/1994/07/21/world/canada-gives-somali-mother-refugee-status.html "Canada Gives Somali Mother Refugee Status"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170813224305/http://www.nytimes.com/1994/07/21/world/canada-gives-somali-mother-refugee-status.html |date=13 August 2017 }}. ''The New York Times''.</ref> In 1997 section 268 of its Criminal Code was amended to ban FGM, except where "the person is at least eighteen years of age and there is no resulting bodily harm".<ref>[http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/C-46/section-268.html Section 268] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190502191321/https://www.ag.gov.au/Publications/Documents/ReviewofAustraliasfemalegenitalmutilationlegalframework/Review%20of%20Australias%20female%20genital%20mutilation%20legal%20framework.pdf |date=2 May 2019 }}. Criminal Code of Canada.</ref><ref name=UNICEF2013p8/> {{As of|2019|2}}, there had been no prosecutions. Officials have expressed concern that thousands of Canadian girls are at risk of being taken overseas to undergo the procedure, so-called "vacation cutting".<ref>Portenier, Giselle (6 February 2019). [https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/article-when-will-canada-take-action-for-girls-who-endure-fgm/ "When will Canada take action for girls who endure FGM?"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201202074503/https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/article-when-will-canada-take-action-for-girls-who-endure-fgm/ |date=2 December 2020 }}. ''The Globe and Mail''.</ref>

====Europe====
According to the European Parliament, 500,000 women in Europe had undergone FGM {{as of|2009|03|lc=y}}.{{sfn|Yoder|Wang|Johansen|2013|loc=195}} In France up to 30,000 women were thought to have experienced it as of 1995. According to Colette Gallard, a family-planning counsellor, when FGM was first encountered in France, the reaction was that Westerners ought not to intervene. It took the deaths of two girls in 1982, one of them three months old, for that attitude to change.{{sfn|Gallard|1995|loc=1592}}<ref name=Rowling/> In 1991 a French court ruled that the Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees offered protection to FGM victims; the decision followed an asylum application from Aminata Diop, who fled an FGM procedure in Mali.<ref>Jana Meredyth Talton, "Asylum for Genital-Mutilation Fugitives: Building a Precedent", Ms., January/February 1992, 17.</ref> The practice is outlawed by several provisions of France's penal code that address bodily harm causing permanent mutilation or torture.<ref>[http://eige.europa.eu/sites/default/files/documents/current_situation_and_trends_of_female_genital_mutilation_in_france_en.pdf "Current situation of female genital mutilation in France"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160207130739/http://eige.europa.eu/sites/default/files/documents/current_situation_and_trends_of_female_genital_mutilation_in_france_en.pdf |date=7 February 2016 }}, European Institute for Gender Equality, European Union.</ref><ref name=Rowling>Megan Rowling [http://news.trust.org//item/?map=france-reduces-genital-cutting-with-prevention-prosecutions-lawyer/ "France reduces genital cutting with prevention, prosecutions – lawyer"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170101055918/http://news.trust.org/item/?map=france-reduces-genital-cutting-with-prevention-prosecutions-lawyer%2F |date=1 January 2017 }}, Thomson Reuters Foundation, 27 September 2012.</ref><!--find source: All children under six who were born in France undergo medical examinations that include inspection of the genitals, and doctors are obliged to report FGM.--> The first civil suit was in 1982,{{sfn|Gallard|1995|loc=1592}} and the first criminal prosecution in 1993.<ref name=Farnsworth1994/> In 1999 a woman was given an eight-year sentence for having performed FGM on 48 girls.<ref>David Gollaher, ''Circumcision: A History of the World's Most Controversial Surgery'', New York: Basic Books, 2000, 189.</ref> By 2014 over 100 parents and two practitioners had been prosecuted in over 40 criminal cases.<!--check source--><ref name=Rowling/>

Around 137,000 women and girls living in England and Wales were born in countries where FGM is practised, as of 2011.<ref>Alison Macfarlane and Efua Dorkenoo, [http://www.equalitynow.org/sites/default/files/FGM%20EN%20City%20Estimates.pdf "Female Genital Mutilation in England and Wales"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150815112821/http://www.equalitynow.org/sites/default/files/FGM%20EN%20City%20Estimates.pdf |date=15 August 2015 }}, City University of London and Equality Now, 21 July 2014, 3.{{pb}}
[http://eige.europa.eu/sites/default/files/documents/Study%20to%20map%20the%20current%20situation%20and%20trends%20on%20FGM%20-Country%20reports%20-%20MH3212540ENN.pdf "Country Report: United Kingdom"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170319112338/http://eige.europa.eu/sites/default/files/documents/Study%20to%20map%20the%20current%20situation%20and%20trends%20on%20FGM%20-Country%20reports%20-%20MH3212540ENN.pdf |date=19 March 2017 }}, ''Study to map the current situation and trends of FGM: Country reports'', European Institute for Gender Equality, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2013, 487–532.{{pb}}
For an early article on FGM in the UK, see {{harvnb|Black|Debelle|1995}}</ref> Performing FGM on children or adults was outlawed under the Prohibition of Female Circumcision Act 1985.<ref><!--add secondary source-->[http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1985/38/contents ''Prohibition of Female Circumcision Act 1985''] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170101055729/http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ilr/article/view/36076 |date=1 January 2017 }}, legislation.gov.uk, The National Archives.</ref> This was replaced by the Female Genital Mutilation Act 2003 and Prohibition of Female Genital Mutilation (Scotland) Act 2005, which added a prohibition on arranging FGM outside the country for British citizens or permanent residents.<ref>[http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/31 Female Genital Mutilation Act 2003] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170714134537/http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/31 |date=14 July 2017 }} and [http://www.legislation.gov.uk/asp/2005/8/contents "Prohibition of Female Genital Mutilation (Scotland) Act 2005"], legislation.gov.uk.</ref>{{efn|Female Genital Mutilation Act 2003: "A person is guilty of an offence if he excises, infibulates or otherwise mutilates the whole or any part of a girl's labia majora, labia minora or clitoris", unless "necessary for her physical or mental health". Although the legislation refers to girls, it applies to women too.<ref>[http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/31 "Female Genital Mutilation Act 2003"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170714134537/http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/31 |date=14 July 2017 }}, legislation.gov.uk, and [http://www.cps.gov.uk/legal/d_to_g/female_genital_mutilation/#a02 "Female Genital Mutilation Act 2003"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130908183829/http://www.cps.gov.uk/legal/d_to_g/female_genital_mutilation/#a02 |date=8 September 2013 }} (legal guidance), Crown Prosecution Service: "The Act refers to 'girls', though it also applies to women."</ref>}} The United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW) asked the government in July 2013 to "ensure the full implementation of its legislation on FGM".<ref>CEDAW, July 2013, 6, paras&nbsp;36, 37.</ref> The first charges were brought in 2014 against a physician and another man; the physician had stitched an infibulated woman after opening her for childbirth. Both men were acquitted in 2015.<ref>Sandra Laville, [https://www.theguardian.com/society/2015/feb/04/doctor-not-guilty-fgm-dhanuson-dharmasena "Doctor found not guilty of FGM on patient at London hospital"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180206042151/https://www.theguardian.com/society/2015/feb/04/doctor-not-guilty-fgm-dhanuson-dharmasena |date=6 February 2018 }}, ''The Guardian'', 4 February 2015.</ref><!--NOTE: PLEASE CONSIDER ADDING EXTRA DETAILS ABOUT THE UK TO Female genital mutilation in the United Kingdom. MANY THANKS!-->

==Criticism of opposition==
===Tolerance versus human rights===
[[File:Obioma Nnaemeka.jpg|thumb|upright=0.9|alt=photograph|Obioma Nnaemeka criticized the renaming of female circumcision to female genital mutilation.{{sfn|Nnaemeka|2005|loc=[https://conifer.rhizome.org/Germinal/wikipedia/20180527025854/https://books.google.com/books?id=XjctVvOzzcQC&pg=PA34 34]{{cbignore}}}}]]

Anthropologists have accused FGM eradicationists of [[Social:Cultural imperialism|cultural colonialism]], and have been criticized in turn for their [[Philosophy:Moral relativism|moral relativism]] and failure to defend the idea of universal [[Philosophy:Human rights|human rights]].{{sfn|Silverman|2004|loc=420}} According to critics of the eradicationist position, the [[Philosophy:Reductionism#In science|biological reductionism]] of the opposition to FGM, and the failure to appreciate FGM's cultural context, serves to "other" practitioners and undermine their agency—in particular when parents are referred to as "mutilators".{{sfn|Kirby|2005|loc=83}}

Africans who object to the tone of FGM opposition risk appearing to defend the practice. The feminist theorist Obioma Nnaemeka, herself strongly opposed to FGM, argued in 2005 that renaming the practice ''female genital mutilation'' had introduced "a subtext of barbaric African and Muslim cultures and the West's relevance (even indispensability) in purging [it]".{{sfn|Nnaemeka|2005|loc=[https://books.google.com/books?id=XjctVvOzzcQC&pg=PA33 33]}} According to Ugandan law professor Sylvia Tamale, the early Western opposition to FGM stemmed from a Judeo-Christian judgment that African sexual and family practices, including not only FGM but also [[Medicine:Dry sex|dry sex]], [[Social:Polygyny|polygyny]], [[Social:Bride price|bride price]] and [[Social:Levirate marriage|levirate marriage]], required correction. African feminists "take strong exception to the imperialist, racist and dehumanising infantilization of African women", she wrote in 2011.{{sfn|Tamale|2011|loc=[https://books.google.com/books?id=xSqIrrswbG0C&pg=PA19 19–20]}} Commentators highlight the voyeurism in the treatment of women's bodies as exhibits. Examples include images of women's vulvas after FGM or girls undergoing the procedure.{{sfn|Nnaemeka|2005|loc=[https://books.google.com/books?id=XjctVvOzzcQC&pg=PA30 30–33]}} The 1996 Pulitzer-prize-winning photographs of a 16-year-old Kenyan girl experiencing FGM were published by 12 American newspapers, without her consent either to be photographed or to have the images published.<ref>{{harvnb|Korieh|2005|loc=[https://books.google.com/books?id=XjctVvOzzcQC&pg=PA121 121–122]}}; for the photographs, see {{cite web |title=Stephanie Welsh. The 1996 Pulitzer Prize Winners: Feature Photography |url=http://www.pulitzer.org/works/1996-Feature-Photography |publisher=The Pulitzer Prizes|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151007101527/http://www.pulitzer.org/works/1996-Feature-Photography |archive-date=7 October 2015 |date=1996|url-status=live}}</ref>

The debate has highlighted a tension between anthropology and feminism, with the former's focus on tolerance and the latter's on equal rights for women. According to the anthropologist Christine Walley, a common position in anti-FGM literature has been to present African women as victims of [[False consciousness|false consciousness]] participating in their own oppression, a position promoted by feminists in the 1970s and 1980s, including Fran Hosken, Mary Daly and Hanny Lightfoot-Klein.{{sfn|Walley|2002|loc=[https://books.google.com/books?id=t_5a39rTNB8C&pg=PA18 18], 34, 43, [https://books.google.com/books?id=t_5a39rTNB8C&pg=PA60 60]}} It prompted the French Association of Anthropologists to issue a statement in 1981, at the height of the early debates, that "a certain feminism resuscitates (today) the moralistic arrogance of yesterday's colonialism".{{sfn|Bagnol|Mariano|2011|loc=281}}

===Comparison with other procedures{{anchor|comparison}}===
====Cosmetic procedures====
Nnaemeka argues that the crucial question, broader than FGM, is why the female body is subjected to so much "abuse and indignity", including in the West.{{sfn|Nnaemeka|2005|loc=[https://books.google.com/books?id=XjctVvOzzcQC&pg=PA38 38–39]}} Several authors have drawn a parallel between FGM and cosmetic procedures.<ref>{{harvnb|Johnsdotter|Essén|2010|loc=32}}; {{harvnb|Berer|2007|loc=1335}}.</ref> Ronán Conroy of the [[Organization:Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland|Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland]] wrote in 2006 that cosmetic genital procedures were "driving the advance" of FGM by encouraging women to see natural variations as defects.{{sfn|Conroy|2006}} Anthropologist Fadwa El Guindi compared FGM to breast enhancement, in which the maternal function of the breast becomes secondary to men's sexual pleasure.{{sfn|El Guindi|2007|loc=[https://books.google.com/books?id=8VQxt634pfcC&pg=PA33 33]}} Benoîte Groult, the French feminist, made a similar point in 1975, citing FGM and cosmetic surgery as sexist and patriarchal.{{sfn|Wildenthal|2012|loc=148}} Against this, the medical anthropologist Carla Obermeyer argued in 1999 that FGM may be conducive to a subject's social well-being in the same way that rhinoplasty and male circumcision are.<ref>Obermeyer, Carla. [http://www.jstor.org/stable/649659 "Female Genital Surgeries: The Known, the Unknown and the Unknowable"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200809185753/https://www.jstor.org/stable/649659 |date=9 August 2020 }}, ''Medical Anthropology Quarterly'', 31(1), 1999, pp. 79–106 (hereafter Obermeyer 1999), 94.</ref> Despite the 2007 ban in Egypt, Egyptian women wanting FGM for their daughters seek ''amalyet tajmeel'' (cosmetic surgery) to remove what they see as excess genital tissue.<ref>Sara Abdel Rahim, [http://timep.org/commentary/midwives-doctors-searching-safer-circumcisions-egypt# "From Midwives to Doctors: Searching for 'Safer' Circumcisions in Egypt?"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170730231539/http://timep.org/commentary/midwives-doctors-searching-safer-circumcisions-egypt |date=30 July 2017 }}, The Tahrir Institute for Middle East Policy, 25 September 2014.</ref>

[[File:Martha Nussbaum wikipedia 10-10.jpg|thumb|left|alt=photograph|Martha Nussbaum: a key moral and legal issue with FGM is that it is mostly conducted on children using physical force.]]
Cosmetic procedures such as [[Medicine:Labiaplasty|labiaplasty]] and [[Medicine:Clitoral hood reduction|clitoral hood reduction]] do fall within the WHO's definition of FGM, which aims to avoid loopholes, but the WHO notes that these elective practices are generally not regarded as FGM.{{efn|WHO 2008: "Some practices, such as genital cosmetic surgery and hymen repair, which are legally accepted in many countries and not generally considered to constitute female genital mutilation, actually fall under the definition used here. It has been considered important, however, to maintain a broad definition of female genital mutilation in order to avoid loopholes that might allow the practice to continue."<ref>WHO 2008, 28.</ref>}} Some legislation banning FGM, such as in Canada and the United States, covers minors only, but several countries, including Sweden and the United Kingdom, have banned it regardless of consent. Sweden, for example, has banned operations "on the outer female sexual organs with a view to mutilating them or bringing about some other permanent change in them, regardless of whether or not consent has been given for the operation".<ref name=EigeSweden/> Gynaecologist Birgitta Essén and anthropologist Sara Johnsdotter argue that the law seems to distinguish between Western and African genitals, and deems only African women (such as those seeking reinfibulation after childbirth) unfit to make their own decisions.<ref>{{harvnb|Johnsdotter|Essén|2010|loc=33}}; {{harvnb|Essén|Johnsdotter|2004|loc=32}}.</ref>

The philosopher [[Biography:Martha Nussbaum|Martha Nussbaum]] argues that a key concern with FGM is that it is mostly conducted on children using physical force. The distinction between social pressure and physical force is morally and legally salient, comparable to the distinction between seduction and rape. She argues further that the literacy of women in practising countries is generally poorer than in developed nations, which reduces their ability to make informed choices.{{sfn|Nussbaum|1999|loc=123–124}}<ref>Also see Yael Tamir, [http://new.bostonreview.net/BR21.3/Tamir.html "Hands Off Clitoridectomy"] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140808051255/http://new.bostonreview.net/BR21.3/Tamir.html |date=8 August 2014 }}, ''Boston Review'', Summer 1996; [[Biography:Martha Nussbaum|Martha Nussbaum]], [http://new.bostonreview.net/BR21.5/nussbaum.html "Double Moral Standards?"] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140808051257/http://new.bostonreview.net/BR21.5/nussbaum.html |date=8 August 2014 }}, ''Boston Review'', October/November 1996.</ref>

====Analogy to other genital-altering procedures ====

FGM has been compared to other procedures that modify the human genitalia. Conservatives in the United States during the late 2010s and early 2020s have argued that FGM is similar to [[Medicine:Gender-affirming surgery|gender-affirming surgery]] for transgender individuals, which has led to bills being drafted in Republican states equating the two. Criticism of these ideas include the fact that the gender-affirming surgeries are approved by American medical authorities, are rare for minors, and are done after reviews by multiple medical professionals.<ref>{{Cite web |last1=Cariboni |first1=Diana |last2=Bauer |first2=Sydney |date=2022-12-22 |title=US bill equates trans healthcare with 'genital mutilation' |url=https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/5050/female-genital-mutilation-fgm-texas-trans-healthcare/ |access-date=2023-10-14 |website=openDemocracy |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Kearns |first=Madeleine |date=October 25, 2022 |title='Gender Affirmation': The New Female Genital Mutilation |url=https://www.nationalreview.com/2022/10/gender-affirmation-the-new-female-genital-mutilation/ |access-date=December 24, 2022 |website=National Review |language=en-US}}</ref> Formerly, FGM was widely referred to as "female circumcision" in the academic literature, but this "was rejected by international medical practitioners because it suggests a fallacious analogy to male circumcision."{{sfn|Nussbaum|1999|loc=119}} It has been argued that the genital alteration of [[Biology:Intersex|intersex]] infants and children, who are born with anomalies that physicians choose to "fix," is analogous to FGM.<ref>Nancy Ehrenreich, Mark Barr, [http://www.law.harvard.edu/students/orgs/crcl/vol40_1/ehrenreich.pdf]{{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170517021052/http://www.law.harvard.edu/students/orgs/crcl/vol40_1/ehrenreich.pdf|date=17 May 2017}}<span> "Intersex Surgery, Female Genital Cutting, and the Selective Condemnation of 'Cultural Practices</span>{{' "}}, ''Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review'', 40(1), 2005 (71–140), 74–75.{{pb}}
{{cite news |last1=Gregorio |first1=I. W. |date=26 April 2017 |title=Should Surgeons Perform Irreversible Genital Surgery on Children? |url=http://www.newsweek.com/should-surgeons-perform-irreversible-genital-surgery-children-589353 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200806025114/https://www.newsweek.com/should-surgeons-perform-irreversible-genital-surgery-children-589353 |archive-date=6 August 2020 |access-date=9 April 2018 |work=Newsweek |ref=none}}</ref>

==See also==
* International Day of Zero Tolerance for Female Genital Mutilation
* No FGM Australia

==References==
===Notes===
{{notelist|26em}}

===Citations===
{{Reflist|26em}}

===Works cited===
'''Books and book chapters'''
{{refbegin|indent=yes|26em}}
*{{cite book|last1=Abusharaf|first1=Rogaia Mustafa|editor1-last=Abusharaf|editor1-first=Rogaia Mustafa|title=Female Circumcision: Multicultural Perspectives|date=2007|chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=JO_SBQAAQBAJ|publisher=University of Pennsylvania Press|location=Philadelphia|chapter=Introduction: The Custom in Question|isbn=978-0812201024|access-date=16 January 2019|archive-date=10 March 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210310102815/https://books.google.com/books?id=JO_SBQAAQBAJ|url-status=live}}
*{{cite book|last1=Abdalla|first1=Raqiya D.|editor1-last=Abusharaf|editor1-first=Rogaia Mustafa|title=Female Circumcision: Multicultural Perspectives|date=2007|publisher=University of Pennsylvania Press|location=Philadelphia|chapter='My Grandmother Called it the Three Feminine Sorrows': The Struggle of Women Against Female Circumcision in Somalia}}
*{{cite book|last1=Ahmadu|first1=Fuambai|editor1-last=Shell-Duncan|editor1-first=Bettina|editor2-last=Hernlund|editor2-first=Ylva|title=Female "Circumcision" in Africa: Culture Controversy and Change|date=2000|publisher=Lynne Rienner Publishers|location=Boulder|chapter=Rites and Wrongs: An Insider/Outsider Reflects on Power and Excision|chapter-url=}}
*{{cite book|last1=Allen|first1=Peter Lewis|title=The Wages of Sin: Sex and Disease, Past and Present|url=https://archive.org/details/wagesofsinsexdis00alle|url-access=registration|date=2000|publisher=University of Chicago Press|location=Chicago|isbn=9780226014609}}
*{{Cite book|last1=Asmani|first1=Ibrahim Lethome|last2=Abdi|first2=Maryam Sheikh|date=2008|title=De-linking Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting from Islam|publisher=Frontiers in Reproductive Health, USAID|location=Washington|url=http://www.unfpa.org/sites/default/files/pub-pdf/De-linking%20FGM%20from%20Islam%20final%20report.pdf|access-date=26 July 2015|archive-date=21 February 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170221230457/http://www.unfpa.org/sites/default/files/pub-pdf/De-linking%20FGM%20from%20Islam%20final%20report.pdf|url-status=live}}
*{{cite book|last1=Bagnol|first1=Brigitte|last2=Mariano|first2=Esmeralda|title=African Sexualities: A Reader|date=2011|publisher=Fahamu/Pambazuka|location=Cape Town|chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=xSqIrrswbG0C|chapter=Politics of Naming Sexual Practices|isbn=9780857490162|access-date=27 August 2017|archive-date=1 August 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200801123522/https://books.google.com/books?id=xSqIrrswbG0C|url-status=live}}
*{{cite book|last1=Barker-Benfield|first1=G. J.|title=The Horrors of the Half-Known Life: Male Attitudes Toward Women and Sexuality in Nineteenth-Century America|date=1999|publisher=Routledge|location=New York}}
*{{cite book|last1=Berlin|first1=Adele|title=The Oxford Dictionary of the Jewish Religion|date=2011|publisher=Oxford University Press|location=New York|chapter=Circumcision}}
*{{cite book|last1=Boddy|first1=Janice|title=Civilizing Women: British Crusades in Colonial Sudan|date=2007|publisher=Princeton University Press|location=Princeton}}
*{{cite book|last1=Boddy|first1=Janice|title=Wombs and Alien Spirits: Women, Men, and the Zar Cult in Northern Sudan|date=1989|publisher=University of Wisconsin Press|location=Madison}}
*{{cite book |last1=Boyle |first1=Elizabeth Heger |title=Female Genital Cutting: Cultural Conflict in the Global Community |date=2002 |publisher=Johns Hopkins University Press |location=Baltimore }}
*{{cite book|last1=Cohen|first1=Shaye J. D.|title=Why Aren't Jewish Women Circumcised? Gender and Covenant In Judaism|date=2005|publisher=University of California Press|location=Berkeley}}
*{{cite book|last1=El Guindi|first1=Fadwa|editor1-last=Abusharaf|editor1-first=Rogaia Mustafa|title=Female Circumcision: Multicultural Perspectives|date=2007|chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=JO_SBQAAQBAJ|publisher=University of Pennsylvania Press|location=Philadelphia|chapter=Had ''This'' Been Your Face, Would You Leave It as Is?|isbn=978-0812201024|access-date=16 January 2019|archive-date=10 March 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210310102815/https://books.google.com/books?id=JO_SBQAAQBAJ|url-status=live}}
*{{cite book|last1=El Dareer|first1=Asma|title=Woman, Why Do You Weep: Circumcision and its Consequences|date=1982|publisher=Zed Books|location=London}}
*{{cite book|last1=Fiedler|first1=Klaus|title=Christianity and African Culture|date=1996|publisher=Brill|location=Leiden}}
*{{cite book|last1=Gruenbaum|first1=Ellen|title=The Female Circumcision Controversy: An Anthropological Perspective|date=2001|publisher=University of Pennsylvania Press|location=Philadelphia}}
*{{cite book|last1=Hoberman|first1=John Milton|title=Testosterone Dreams: Rejuvenation, Aphrodisia, Doping|url=https://archive.org/details/testosteronedrea00hobe|url-access=registration|date=2005|publisher=University of California Press|location=Berkeley|isbn=9780520221512}}
*{{cite book|last1=Hosken|first1=Fran|title=The Hosken Report: Genital and Sexual Mutilation of Females|date=1994|orig-year=1979|publisher=Women's International Network|location=Lexington}}
*{{cite book|last1=Hyam|first1=Ronald|title=Empire and Sexuality: The British Experience|date=1990|publisher=Manchester University Press|location=Manchester}}
*{{cite book |last1=Jacobs |first1=Micah |last2=Grady |first2=Richard |last3=Bolnick |first3= David A. |year= 2012 |chapter= Current Circumcision Trends and Guidelines |editor1-last=Bolnick |editor1-first=David A. |editor2-last=Koyle |editor2-first=Martin |editor3-last=Yosha |editor3-first=Assaf |title=Surgical Guide to Circumcision |location= London |publisher=Springer |pages=3–8 |doi=10.1007/978-1-4471-2858-8_1 |isbn=978-1-4471-2857-1}}
*{{cite book|last1=Karanja|first1=James|title=The Missionary Movement in Colonial Kenya: The Foundation of Africa Inland Church|date=2009|publisher=Cuvillier Verlag|location=Göttingen|url=}}
*{{cite book|last1=Kenyatta|first1=Jomo|title=Facing Mount Kenya|date=1962|orig-year=1938|publisher= Vintage Books|location=New York|url=}}
*{{cite book|last1=Kenyon|first1=F. G.|title=Greek Papyri in the British Museum|date=1893|publisher=British Museum|location=London|isbn=9780714104867|url=https://archive.org/details/greekpapyriinbri03brit}}
*{{cite book|last=Kirby|first=Vicky|chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=XjctVvOzzcQC|title=Female Circumcision and the Politics of Knowledge: African Women in Imperialist Discourses|publisher=Praeger|location=Westport, Conn and London|editor-last=Nnaemeka|editor-first=Obioma|year=2005|chapter=Out of Africa: 'Our Bodies Ourselves?'|pages=|isbn=9780897898645|access-date=27 August 2017|archive-date=23 December 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161223225344/https://books.google.com/books?id=XjctVvOzzcQC|url-status=live}}
*{{cite book|last=Korieh|first=Chima|chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=XjctVvOzzcQC|title=Female Circumcision and the Politics of Knowledge: African Women in Imperialist Discourses|publisher=Praeger|location=Westport, Conn and London|editor-last=Nnaemeka|editor-first=Obioma|year=2005|chapter='Other' Bodies: Western Feminism, Race and Representation in Female Circumcision Discourse|pages=|isbn=9780897898645|access-date=27 August 2017|archive-date=23 December 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161223225344/https://books.google.com/books?id=XjctVvOzzcQC|url-status=live}}
*{{cite book|last1=Kunhiyop|first1=Samuel Waje|title=African Christian Ethics|date=2008|publisher=Zondervan|location=Grand Rapids, MI}}
*{{cite book|last1=Mackie|first1=Gerry|editor1-last=Shell-Duncan|editor1-first=Bettina|editor2-last=Hernlund|editor2-first=Ylva|title=Female "Circumcision" in Africa: Culture Controversy and Change|date=2000|publisher=Lynne Rienner Publishers|location=Boulder|chapter=Female Genital Cutting: The Beginning of the End|chapter-url=http://www.polisci.ucsd.edu/~gmackie/documents/BeginningOfEndMackie2000.pdf|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131029210333/http://www.polisci.ucsd.edu/~gmackie/documents/BeginningOfEndMackie2000.pdf|archive-date=29 October 2013}}
*{{cite book|last1=Mandara|first1=Mairo Usman|editor1-last=Shell-Duncan|editor1-first=Bettina|editor2-last=Hernlund|editor2-first=Ylva|title=Female "Circumcision" in Africa: Culture Controversy and Change|date=2000|publisher=Lynne Rienner Publishers|location=Boulder|chapter=Female genital cutting in Nigeria: View of Nigerian Doctors on the Medicalization Debate}}
*{{cite book|last1=McGregor|first1=Deborah Kuhn|title=From Midwives to Medicine: The Birth of American Gynecology|date=1998|publisher=Rutgers University Press|location=New Brunswick|isbn=}}
*{{cite book|last=Nnaemeka|first=Obioma|chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=XjctVvOzzcQC|title=Female Circumcision and the Politics of Knowledge: African Women in Imperialist Discourses|publisher=Praeger|location=Westport, Conn and London|editor-last=Nnaemeka|editor-first=Obioma|year=2005|chapter=African Women, Colonial Discourses, and Imperialist Interventions: Female Circumcision as Impetus|pages=27–46|isbn=9780897898645|access-date=27 August 2017|archive-date=23 December 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161223225344/https://books.google.com/books?id=XjctVvOzzcQC|url-status=live}}
*{{cite book|last1=Nussbaum|first1=Martha|title=Sex and Social Justice|date=1999|publisher=Oxford University Press|location=New York and Oxford|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=7zoaKIolT9oC|isbn=9780195355017|access-date=27 August 2017|archive-date=25 July 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200725081740/https://books.google.com/books?id=7zoaKIolT9oC|url-status=live}}
*{{cite book|last1=Nzegwu|first1=Nkiru|title=African Sexualities: A Reader|date=2011|publisher=Fahamu/Pambazuka|location=Cape Town|chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=xSqIrrswbG0C|chapter='Osunality' (or African eroticism)|isbn=9780857490162|access-date=27 August 2017|archive-date=1 August 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200801123522/https://books.google.com/books?id=xSqIrrswbG0C|url-status=live}}
*{{cite book |last1=Peterson |first1=Derek R. |title=Ethnic Patriotism and the East African Revival: A History of Dissent, c.&nbsp;1935–1972 |date=2012 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |location=New York }}
*{{cite book|last1=Roald|first1=Ann-Sofie|title=Women in Islam: The Western Experience|date=2003|publisher=Routledge|location=London}}
*{{cite book|last1=Robert|first1=Dana Lee|title=American Women in Mission: A Social History of Their Thought and Practice|date=1996|publisher=Mercer University Press|location=Macon}}
*{{cite book|last1=Rodriguez|first1=Sarah B.|title=Female Circumcision and Clitoridectomy in the United States: A History of a Medical Treatment|date=2014|publisher=University of Rochester Press|location=Rochester, NY}}
*{{cite book|last1=El Saadawi|first1=Nawal|title=The Hidden Face of Eve|date=2007|orig-year=1980|publisher=Zed Books|location=London}}
*{{cite book|last1=Shorter|first1=Edward|title=From Paralysis to Fatigue: A History of Psychosomatic Illness in the Modern Era|date=2008|publisher=Simon and Schuster|location=New York}}
*{{cite book|last1=Strayer|first1=Robert|last2=Murray|first2=Jocelyn|editor1-last=Strayer|editor1-first=Robert|title=The Making of Missionary Communities in East Africa|date=1978|publisher=State University of New York Press|location=New York|chapter=The CMS and Female Circumcision}}
*{{cite book|last1=Tamale|first1=Sylvia|editor1-last=Tamale|editor1-first=Sylvia|title=African Sexualities: A Reader|url=https://archive.org/details/africansexualiti00tama|url-access=limited|date=2011|publisher=Pambazuka Press/Fahamu|pages=[https://archive.org/details/africansexualiti00tama/page/n179 11]–36|chapter=Researching and theorising sexualities in Africa|isbn=9780857490162}}
*{{cite book |last1=Thomas |first1=Lynn M. |editor1-last=Shell-Duncan|editor1-first=Bettina|editor2-last=Hernlund|editor2-first=Ylva|title=Female "Circumcision" in Africa: Culture Controversy and Change|date=2000|publisher=Lynne Rienner Publishers|location=Boulder|pages= |chapter=Ngaitana (I will circumcise myself)': Lessons from Colonial Campaigns to Ban Excision in Meru, Kenya}}
*{{cite book|last1=Thomas|first1=Lynn|title=Politics of the Womb: Women, Reproduction, and the State in Kenya|date=2003|publisher=University of California Press|location=Berkeley}}
*{{cite book|last1=Thomas|first1=Robert|title=The Modern Practice of Physick|date=1813|publisher=Longman, Hurst, Rees, Orme, and Brown|location=London}}
*{{cite book |last1=wa Kihurani |first1=Nyambura |last2=Warigia wa Johanna |first2=Raheli |last3=Murigo wa Meshak |first3=Alice |editor1-last=Lihamba |editor1-first=Amandina |editor2-last=Moyo |editor2-first=Fulata L.|editor2-link=Fulata Moyo |editor3-last=Mulokozi |editor3-first=Mugaybuso M. |editor4-last=Shitemi |editor4-first=Naomi L. |editor5-last=Yahya-Othman |editor5-first=Saida |title=Women Writing Africa: The Eastern Region |date=2007 |publisher=The Feminist Press at the City University of New York |location=New York |isbn=978-1558615342 |pages=118–120 |chapter=Letter Opposing Female Circumcision}}
*{{cite book|last1=Walley|first1=Christine J.|editor1-last=James|editor1-first=Stanlie M.|editor2-last=Robertson|editor2-first=Claire C.|title=Genital Cutting and Transnational Sisterhood|date=2002|publisher=University of Illinois Press|location=Urbana|pages=54–86|chapter="Searching for 'Voices': Feminism, Anthropology, and the Global Over Female Genital Operations"}}
*{{cite book|last1=Wildenthal|first1=Lora|title=The Language of Human Rights in West Germany|date=2012|publisher=University of Pennsylvania Press|location=Philadelphia}}
*{{cite book|last1=Zabus|first1=Chantal|editor1-last=Borch|editor1-first=Merete Falck|title=Bodies and Voices: The Force-field of Representation and Discourse in Colonial and Postcolonial Studies|date=2008|publisher=Rodopi|location=New York|pages=|chapter=The Excised Body in African Texts and Contexts}}
*{{cite book|last1=Zabus|first1=Chantal|editor1-last=Bertacco|editor1-first=Simon|title=Language and Translation in Postcolonial Literatures|date=2013|publisher=Routledge|location=New York|pages=|chapter='Writing with an Accent': From Early Decolonization to Contemporary Gender Issues in the African Novel in French, English, and Arabic}}
{{refend}}

'''Journal articles'''
{{refbegin|indent=yes|26em}}
*{{Cite journal|last1=Abdulcadir|first1=Jasmine|last2=Margairaz|first2=Christiane|last3=Boulvain|first3=Michel|last4=Irion|first4=Olivier|date=6 January 2011|title=Care of women with female genital mutilation/cutting|url=|journal=Swiss Medical Weekly|volume=140|pages=w13137|doi=10.4414/smw.2011.13137|issn=1424-3997|pmid=21213149|doi-access=free}}
*{{Cite journal|last1=Abdulcadir|first1=Jasmine|last2=Catania|first2=Lucrezia|last3=Hindin|first3=Michelle Jane|last4=Say|first4=Lale|last5=Petignat|first5=Patrick|last6=Abdulcadir|first6=Omar|date=November 2016|title=Female Genital Mutilation: A Visual Reference and Learning Tool for Health Care Professionals|url=|journal=Obstetrics & Gynecology|volume=128|issue=5|pages=958–963|doi=10.1097/AOG.0000000000001686|issn=1873-233X|pmid=27741194|s2cid=46830711}}
*{{Cite journal|last1=Sibiani|first1=Sharifa A.|last2=Rouzi|first2=Abdulrahim A.|date=September 2008|title=Sexual function in women with female genital mutilation|url=http://www.fertstert.org/article/S0015-0282%2808%2901813-X/fulltext|journal=Fertility and Sterility|volume=93|issue=3|pages=722–724|doi=10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.10.035|issn=1556-5653|pmid=19028385|access-date=28 October 2014|archive-date=28 August 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210828084004/https://www.fertstert.org/article/S0015-0282%2808%2901813-X/fulltext|url-status=live|doi-access=free}}
*{{Cite journal|last=American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Bioethics|date=July 1998|title=Female genital mutilation|url=|journal=Pediatrics|volume=102|issue=1 Pt 1|pages=153–156|issn=0031-4005|pmid=9651425|ref=hrav|doi=10.1542/peds.102.1.153|doi-access=free}}
*{{Cite journal|last=American Academy of Pediatrics Board of Directors|date=July 2010|title=Ritual genital cutting of female minors [withdrawn] |journal=Pediatrics|volume=126|issue=1|pages=191|doi=10.1542/peds.2010-1568|issn=1098-4275|pmid=20530070|doi-access=free|ref=none}}
*{{Cite journal|last1=Askew|first1=Ian|last2=Chaiban|first2=Ted|last3=Kalasa|first3=Benoit|last4=Sen|first4=Purna|date=1 September 2016|title=A repeat call for complete abandonment of FGM|journal=Journal of Medical Ethics|language=en|volume=42|issue=9|pages=619–620|doi=10.1136/medethics-2016-103553|issn=0306-6800|pmid=27059789|pmc=5013096}}
*{{Cite journal|last1=Banks|first1=Emily|last2=Meirik|first2=Olav|last3=Farley|first3=Tim|last4=Akande|first4=Oluwole|last5=Bathija|first5=Heli|last6=Ali|first6=Mohamed|last7=WHO study group on female genital mutilation and obstetric outcome|date=3 June 2006|title=Female genital mutilation and obstetric outcome: WHO collaborative prospective study in six African countries|url=|journal=Lancet|volume=367|issue=9525|pages=1835–1841|doi=10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68805-3|issn=1474-547X|pmid=16753486|s2cid=1077505}}
*{{Cite journal|last=Berer|first=Marge|date=30 June 2007|title=Cosmetic genitoplasty: It's female genital mutilation and should be prosecuted|journal=BMJ|volume=334|issue=7608|pages=1335.2–1335|doi=10.1136/bmj.39252.646042.3A|issn=1756-1833|pmc=1906631|pmid=17599983}}
*{{Cite journal|last1=Berg|first1=Rigmor C.|last2=Underland|first2=Vigdis|last3=Odgaard-Jensen|first3=Jan|last4=Fretheim|first4=Atle|last5=Vist|first5=Gunn E.|date=21 November 2014|title=Effects of female genital cutting on physical health outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis|url=|journal=BMJ Open|volume=4|issue=11|pages=e006316|doi=10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006316|issn=2044-6055|pmc=4244458|pmid=25416059}}
*{{Cite journal|last1=Berg|first1=Rigmor C.|last2=Denison|first2=Eva|date=October 2013|title=A tradition in transition: factors perpetuating and hindering the continuance of female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C) summarized in a systematic review|journal=Health Care for Women International|volume=34|issue=10|pages=837–859|doi=10.1080/07399332.2012.721417|issn=1096-4665|pmc=3783896|pmid=23489149}}
*{{Cite book|last1=Berg|first1=Rigmor C.|last2=Underland|first2=Vigdis|date=27 March 2014|title=Immediate health consequences of female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C)|journal=Rapport Fra Kunnskapssenteret|url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmedhealth/PMH0097695/pdf/PubMedHealth_PMH0097695.pdf|publisher=Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services (Kunnskapssenteret)|location=Oslo|volume=|issue=8|pages=837–859|doi=|issn=1890-1298|isbn=978-82-8121-856-7|pmid=29320014|access-date=11 April 2018|archive-date=28 August 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210828084004/https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK464798/pdf/Bookshelf_NBK464798.pdf|url-status=live}}
*{{Cite journal|last1=Black|first1=J. A.|last2=Debelle|first2=G. D.|date=17 June 1995|title=Female genital mutilation in Britain|journal=BMJ|volume=310|issue=6994|pages=1590–1592|issn=0959-8138|pmc=2549951|pmid=7787654|doi=10.1136/bmj.310.6994.1590}}
*{{Cite journal|last=Black|first=John|date=July 1997|title=Female genital mutilation: a contemporary issue, and a Victorian obsession|url=|journal=Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine|volume=90|issue=7|pages=402–405|issn=0141-0768|pmc=1296388|pmid=9290425|doi=10.1177/014107689709000712}}
*{{Cite journal|author=J. F. C.|date=8 February 1873|title=Isaac Baker Brown, F.R.C.S.|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=gZ4EAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA155|journal=Medical Times and Gazette|volume=1|issue=1180|pages=|access-date=27 August 2017|archive-date=1 August 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200801121010/https://books.google.com/books?id=gZ4EAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA155|url-status=live}}
*{{Cite journal|last=Conroy|first=Ronán M|date=15 July 2006|title=Female genital mutilation: whose problem, whose solution?|url=|journal=BMJ|volume=333|issue=7559|pages=106–107|doi=10.1136/bmj.333.7559.106|issn=0959-8138|pmc=1502236|pmid=16840444}}
*{{Cite journal|last=Cutner|first=Lawrence P.|date=July 1985|title=Female genital mutilation|journal=Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey|volume=40|issue=7|pages=437–443|issn=0029-7828|pmid=4022475|doi=10.1097/00006254-198507000-00004|s2cid=22472191}}
*{{Cite journal|last1=Dave|first1=Amish J.|last2=Sethi|first2=Aisha|last3=Morrone|first3=Aldo|date=January 2011|title=Female genital mutilation: what every American dermatologist needs to know|url=|journal=Dermatologic Clinics|volume=29|issue=1|pages=103–109|doi=10.1016/j.det.2010.09.002|issn=1558-0520|pmid=21095534}}
*{{Cite journal|last1=Elchalal|first1=Uriel|last2=Ben-Ami|first2=B.|last3=Gillis|first3=R.|last4=Brzezinski|first4=A.|date=October 1997|title=Ritualistic female genital mutilation: current status and future outlook|journal=Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey|volume=52|issue=10|pages=643–651|issn=0029-7828|pmid=9326757|doi=10.1097/00006254-199710000-00022}}
*{{Cite journal|last=Elduma|first=Adel Hussein|date=15 February 2018|title=Female Genital Mutilation in Sudan|journal=Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences|volume=6|issue=2|pages=430–434|doi=10.3889/oamjms.2018.099|doi-broken-date=23 January 2024 |pmc=5839462|pmid=29531618}}
*{{Cite journal|last1=Essén|first1=Birgitta|last2=Johnsdotter|first2=Sara|date=July 2004|title=Female genital mutilation in the West: traditional circumcision versus genital cosmetic surgery|url=http://www.hmb.utoronto.ca/HMB303H/Case_Studies/Kenya-FGM/FGM_%26_Cosmetic_Surgery.pdf|journal=Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica|volume=83|issue=7|pages=611–613|doi=10.1111/j.0001-6349.2004.00590.x|issn=0001-6349|pmid=15225183|s2cid=44583626|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130414232252/http://www.hmb.utoronto.ca/HMB303H/Case_Studies/Kenya-FGM/FGM_%26_Cosmetic_Surgery.pdf|archive-date=14 April 2013}}
*{{Cite journal|last=El Dareer|first=A.|date=June 1983|title=Attitudes of Sudanese people to the practice of female circumcision|journal=International Journal of Epidemiology|volume=12|issue=2|pages=138–144|issn=0300-5771|pmid=6874206|doi=10.1093/ije/12.2.138}}
*{{Cite journal|last1=Elmusharaf|first1=Susan|last2=Elhadi|first2=Nagla|last3=Almroth|first3=Lars|date=15 July 2006|title=Reliability of self reported form of female genital mutilation and WHO classification: cross sectional study|url=|journal=BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.)|volume=333|issue=7559|pages=124|doi=10.1136/bmj.38873.649074.55|issn=1756-1833|pmc=1502195|pmid=16803943}}
*{{Cite journal|last=Gallard|first=Colette|date=17 June 1995|title=Female genital mutilation in France|url=|journal=BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.)|volume=310|issue=6994|pages=1592–1593|issn=0959-8138|pmc=2549952|pmid=7787655|doi=10.1136/bmj.310.6994.1592}}
*{{Cite journal|last=Gruenbaum|first=Ellen|date=September–October 2005|title=Socio-Cultural Dynamics of Female Genital Cutting: Research Findings, Gaps, and Directions|journal=Culture, Health & Sexuality|volume=7|issue=5|pages=429–441|jstor=4005473|doi=10.1080/13691050500262953|pmid=16864214|s2cid=4999356}}
*{{Cite journal|last=Hayes|first=Rose Oldfield|date=17 June 1975|title=Female Genital Mutilation, Fertility Control, Women's Roles, and the Patrilineage in Modern Sudan: A Functional Analysis|url=|journal=American Ethnologist|volume=2|issue=4|pages=617–633|jstor=643328|doi=10.1525/ae.1975.2.4.02a00030|doi-access=free}}
*{{Cite journal|last1=Horowitz|first1=Carol R.|last2=Jackson|first2=J. Carey|last3=Teklemariam|first3=Mamae|date=19 January 1995|title=Female Circumcision|journal=New England Journal of Medicine|volume=332|issue=3|pages=188–190|doi=10.1056/nejm199501193320313|issn=0028-4793|pmid=7695718|doi-access=free}}
*{{Cite journal|last1=Iavazzo|first1=Christos|last2=Sardi|first2=Thalia A.|last3=Gkegkes|first3=Ioannis D.|date=June 2013|title=Female genital mutilation and infections: a systematic review of the clinical evidence|url=|journal=Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics|volume=287|issue=6|pages=1137–1149|doi=10.1007/s00404-012-2708-5|issn=1432-0711|pmid=23315098|s2cid=11973412}}
*{{cite web |last1=Ismail |first1=Edna Adan |title=Female genital mutilation survey in Somaliland |date=2016 |url=http://www.ednahospital.org/fgm/wp-content/uploads/FGM-Survey-in-Somaliland-Edna-Adan-Hospital-1.pdf |publisher=Edna Adan University Hospital |access-date=10 September 2017 |archive-date=11 September 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170911073632/http://www.ednahospital.org/fgm/wp-content/uploads/FGM-Survey-in-Somaliland-Edna-Adan-Hospital-1.pdf |url-status=live }}
*{{Cite journal|last1=Jackson|first1=Elizabeth F.|last2=Akweongo|first2=Patricia|last3=Sakeah|first3=Evelyn|last4=Hodgson|first4=Abraham|last5=Asuru|first5=Rofina|last6=Phillips|first6=James F.|date=September 2003|title=Inconsistent reporting of female genital cutting status in northern Ghana: explanatory factors and analytical consequences|url=|journal=Studies in Family Planning|volume=34|issue=3|pages=200–210|issn=0039-3665|pmid=14558322|doi=10.1111/j.1728-4465.2003.00200.x|citeseerx=10.1.1.233.6248}}
*{{Cite journal|last1=Johnsdotter|first1=Sara|last2=Essén|first2=Birgitta|date=May 2010|title=Genitals and ethnicity: the politics of genital modifications|url=http://www.iscgmedia.com/uploads/6/0/9/7/6097060/johnsdotter_cvs.pdf|journal=Reproductive Health Matters|volume=18|issue=35|pages=29–37|doi=10.1016/S0968-8080(10)35495-4|issn=1460-9576|pmid=20541081|s2cid=2261601|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130921053736/http://www.iscgmedia.com/uploads/6/0/9/7/6097060/johnsdotter_cvs.pdf|archive-date=21 September 2013}}
*{{Cite journal|last1=Jones|first1=Wanda K.|last2=Smith|first2=J.|last3=Kieke|first3=B.|last4=Wilcox|first4=L.|date=September 1997|title=Female genital mutilation/Female circumcision. Who is at risk in the U.S.?|url=|journal=Public Health Reports|volume=112|issue=5|pages=368–377|issn=0033-3549|pmc=1381943|pmid=9323387}}
*{{cite journal |last1=Kandala |first1=Ngianga-Bakwin |last2=Ezejimofor |first2=Martinsixtus C. |last3=Uthman |first3=Olalekan A. |last4=Komba |first4=Paul |title=Secular trends in the prevalence of female genital mutilation/cutting among girls: a systematic analysis |journal=BMJ Global Health |date=2018 |volume=3 |issue=5 |pages=e000549 |doi=10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000549 |pmid=30483404 |pmc=6231106 |url=}}
*{{Cite journal|last1=Kelly|first1=Elizabeth|last2=Hillard|first2=Paula J. Adams|date=October 2005|title=Female genital mutilation|journal=Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology|volume=17|issue=5|pages=490–494|issn=1040-872X|pmid=16141763|doi=10.1097/01.gco.0000183528.18728.57|s2cid=7706452}}
*{{cite news|last1=Khazan|first1=Olga|title=Why Some Women Choose to Get Circumcised|url=https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2015/04/female-genital-mutilation-cutting-anthropologist/389640/|work=The Atlantic|date=8 April 2015|access-date=27 August 2017|archive-date=28 August 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170828195951/https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2015/04/female-genital-mutilation-cutting-anthropologist/389640/|url-status=live}}
*{{Cite journal|last=Lightfoot-Klein|first=Hanny|date=1989|title=The Sexual Experience and Marital Adjustment of Genitally Circumcised and Infibulated Females in The Sudan|url=|journal=The Journal of Sex Research|volume=26|issue=3|pages=(375–392), 380|jstor=3812643|doi=10.1080/00224498909551521}}
*{{Cite journal|last1=Klouman|first1=Elise|last2=Manongi|first2=Rachel|last3=Klepp|first3=Knut-Inge|date=January 2005|title=Self-reported and observed female genital cutting in rural Tanzania: associated demographic factors, HIV and sexually transmitted infections|url=|journal=Tropical Medicine & International Health|volume=10|issue=1|pages=105–115|doi=10.1111/j.1365-3156.2004.01350.x|issn=1360-2276|pmid=15655020|s2cid=12050442|doi-access=free}}
*{{Cite journal|last=Knight|first=Mary|date=June 2001|title=Curing cut or ritual mutilation? Some remarks on the practice of female and male circumcision in Graeco-Roman Egypt|url=|journal=Isis|volume=92|issue=2|pages=317–338|issn=0021-1753|pmid=11590895|jstor=3080631|doi=10.1086/385184|s2cid=38351439}}
*{{Cite journal|last1=Kouba|first1=Leonard J.|last2=Muasher|first2=Judith|date=March 1985|title=Female Circumcision in Africa: An Overview|url=|journal=African Studies Review|volume=28|issue=1|pages=95–1100|jstor=524569|doi=10.2307/524569|s2cid=144705914}}
*{{Cite journal|last=Mandara|first=Mairo Usman|date=March 2004|title=Female genital mutilation in Nigeria|url=|journal=International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics|volume=84|issue=3|pages=291–298|doi=10.1016/j.ijgo.2003.06.001|pmid=15001386|s2cid=20969247}}
*{{cite journal|last1=Mackie|first1=Gerry|title=Ending Footbinding and Infibulation: A Convention Account|journal=American Sociological Review|date=December 1996|volume=61|issue=6|pages=999–1017|url=http://pages.ucsd.edu/~gmackie/documents/MackieASR.pdf|jstor=2096305|doi=10.2307/2096305|access-date=6 September 2014|archive-date=20 July 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190720061010/http://pages.ucsd.edu/~gmackie/documents/MackieASR.pdf|url-status=live}}
*{{cite journal|last1=Mackie|first1=Gerry|title=Female Genital Cutting: A Harmless Practice?|journal=Medical Anthropology Quarterly|date=June 2003|volume=17|issue=2|pages=135–158|url=http://pages.ucsd.edu/~gmackie/documents/FGCHarmlessPractice.pdf|jstor=3655332|doi=10.1525/maq.2003.17.2.135|pmid=12846114|access-date=8 January 2016|archive-date=8 August 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170808210842/http://pages.ucsd.edu/~gmackie/documents/FGCHarmlessPractice.pdf|url-status=live}}
*{{cite journal|last1=Murray|first1=Jocelyn|title=The Church Missionary Society and the 'Female Circumcision' Issue in Kenya 1929–1932|journal=Journal of Religion in Africa|date=1976|volume=8|issue=2|pages=92–104|doi=10.1163/157006676X00075|jstor=1594780}}
*{{Cite journal |last=Nour |first=Nawal M. |date=2008 |title=Female Genital Cutting: A Persisting Practice |journal=Reviews in Obstetrics and Gynecology |volume=1 |issue=3 |pages=135–139|pmc=2582648 |pmid=19015765}}
*{{Cite journal|last1=Okeke|first1=T. C.|last2=Anyaehie|first2=Usb|last3=Ezenyeaku|first3=C. C. K.|date=January 2012|title=An overview of female genital mutilation in Nigeria|url=|journal=Annals of Medical and Health Sciences Research|volume=2|issue=1|pages=70–73|doi=10.4103/2141-9248.96942|doi-broken-date=23 January 2024 |issn=2141-9248|pmc=3507121|pmid=23209995 |doi-access=free }}
*{{Cite journal|last=O'Rourke|first=Paul F.|date=1 February 2007|title=The 'm't-Woman|url=https://www.degruyter.com/dg/viewarticle/j$002fzaes.2007.134.issue-2$002fzaes.2007.134.2.166$002fzaes.2007.134.2.166.xml|journal=Zeitschrift für Ägyptische Sprache und Altertumskunde|language=en|volume=134|issue=2|pages=166–172|doi=10.1524/zaes.2007.134.2.166|s2cid=141166451|issn=2196-713X|access-date=15 October 2017|archive-date=2 May 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190502191030/https://www.degruyter.com/dg/viewarticle/j$002fzaes.2007.134.issue-2$002fzaes.2007.134.2.166$002fzaes.2007.134.2.166.xml|url-status=dead}}
*{{Cite journal|last1=Rasheed|first1=Salah M.|last2=Abd-Ellah|first2=Ahmed H.|last3=Yousef|first3=Fouad M.|date=July 2011|title=Female genital mutilation in Upper Egypt in the new millennium|url=|journal=International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics|volume=114|issue=1|pages=47–50|doi=10.1016/j.ijgo.2011.02.003|issn=1879-3479|pmid=21513937|s2cid=28600501}}
*{{Cite journal |last1=Rashid |first1=Mumtaz |last2=Rashid |first2=Mohammed H |date=April 2007|title=Obstetric management of women with female genital mutilation |journal=The Obstetrician & Gynaecologist |language=en |volume=9 |issue=2 |pages=95–101 |doi=10.1576/toag.9.2.095.27310|s2cid=58404665 |doi-access=free }}
*{{Cite journal|last1=Reisel|first1=Dan|last2=Creighton|first2=Sarah M.|date=January 2015|title=Long term health consequences of Female Genital Mutilation (FGM)|url=|journal=Maturitas|volume=80|issue=1|pages=48–51|doi=10.1016/j.maturitas.2014.10.009|issn=1873-4111|pmid=25466303|s2cid=40413987 }}
*{{Cite journal|last=Rodriguez|first=Sarah|date=July 2008|title=Rethinking the history of female circumcision and clitoridectomy: American medicine and female sexuality in the late nineteenth century|url=|journal=Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences|volume=63|issue=3|pages=323–347|doi=10.1093/jhmas/jrm044|issn=1468-4373|pmid=18065832|s2cid=9234753}}
*{{Cite journal|last=Rushwan|first=Hamid|title=Female genital mutilation: A tragedy for women's reproductive health|date=September 2013|journal=African Journal of Urology|volume=19|issue=3|pages=130–133|doi=10.1016/j.afju.2013.03.002|doi-access=free}}
<!--*{{Cite journal|last=Serour|first=Gamal I.|date=May 2010|title=The issue of reinfibulation|url=|journal=International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics|volume=109|issue=2|pages=93–96|doi=10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.01.001|issn=1879-3479|pmid=20138274}}-->
*{{Cite journal|last=Sheehan|first=E.|date=August 1981|title=Victorian clitoridectomy: Isaac Baker Brown and his harmless operative procedure|url=|journal=Medical Anthropology Newsletter|volume=12|issue=4|pages=9–15|issn=0543-2499|pmid=12263443|jstor=647794|doi=10.1525/maq.1981.12.4.02a00120|doi-access=free}}
*{{Cite journal|last=Shell-Duncan|first=Bettina|date=June 2008|title=From Health to Human Rights: Female Genital Cutting and the Politics of Intervention|url=|journal=American Anthropologist|volume=110|issue=2|pages=225–236|doi=10.1111/j.1548-1433.2008.00028.x|jstor=27563985}}
*{{cite journal |last1=Silverman |first1=Eric K. |title=Anthropology and Circumcision |journal=Annual Review of Anthropology |date=2004 |volume=33 |issue= |pages=419–445|jstor=25064860 |doi=10.1146/annurev.anthro.33.070203.143706 }}
*{{cite journal |last1=Thomas |first1=Lynn M. |title='Ngaitana (I will circumcise myself)': The Gender and Generational Politics of the 1956 Ban on Clitoridectomy in Meru, Kenya |journal=Gender and History |date=November 1996 |volume=8 |issue=3 |pages=338–363 |doi=10.1111/j.1468-0424.1996.tb00062.x |pmid=12322506 }}
*{{Cite journal|last1=Toubia|first1=Nadia F.|last2=Sharief|first2=E. H.|date=September 2003|title=Female genital mutilation: have we made progress?|journal=International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics|volume=82|issue=3|pages=251–261|issn=0020-7292|pmid=14499972|doi=10.1016/S0020-7292(03)00229-7|s2cid=39607405|doi-access=free}}
*{{Cite journal|last=Toubia|first=Nadia|date=15 September 1994|title=Female Circumcision as a Public Health Issue|url=|journal=The New England Journal of Medicine|volume=331|issue=11|pages=712–716|doi=10.1056/NEJM199409153311106|issn=0028-4793|pmid=8058079|doi-access=free}}
*{{Cite journal|last=Wakabi|first=Wairagala|date=31 March 2007|title=Africa battles to make female genital mutilation history|url=http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(07)60508-X/fulltext|journal=Lancet|volume=369|issue=9567|pages=1069–1070|doi=10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60508-X|pmid=17405200|s2cid=29006442|access-date=24 April 2013|archive-date=14 May 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130514171022/http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(07)60508-X/fulltext|url-status=live}}
*{{Cite journal|last1=Yasin|first1=Berivan A.|last2=Al-Tawil|first2=Namir G.|last3=Shabila|first3=Nazar P.|last4=Al-Hadithi|first4=Tariq S.|date=8 September 2013|title=Female genital mutilation among Iraqi Kurdish women: A cross-sectional study from Erbil city|journal=BMC Public Health|volume=13|pages=809|doi=10.1186/1471-2458-13-809|issn=1471-2458|pmc=3844478|pmid=24010850 |doi-access=free }}
*{{Cite journal|last1=Yoder|first1=P. Stanley|last2=Wang|first2=Shanxiao|last3=Johansen|first3=Elise|date=June 2013|title=Estimates of female genital mutilation/cutting in 27 African countries and Yemen|url=|journal=Studies in Family Planning|volume=44|issue=2|pages=189–204|doi=10.1111/j.1728-4465.2013.00352.x|issn=0039-3665|pmid=23720002}}
*{{Cite journal|last1=Yoder|first1=P. Stanley|last2=Khan|first2=Shane|date=March 2008|title=Numbers of women circumcised in Africa: The Production of a Total|url=http://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/WP39/WP39.pdf|publisher=USAID|journal=DHS Working Papers|volume=|issue=39|access-date=29 July 2014|archive-date=22 November 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171122012927/https://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/WP39/WP39.pdf|url-status=live}}
{{refend}}

'''United Nations reports'''
{{refbegin|indent=yes|26em}}
*{{wikicite| ref=UNICEF2013 |reference = Cappa, Claudia, et al. [http://data.unicef.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/FGMC_Lo_res_Final_26.pdf ''Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting: A Statistical Overview and Exploration of the Dynamics of Change''], New York: United Nations Children's Fund, July 2013.}}
*{{wikicite|ref=WHO2014|reference = [https://web.archive.org/web/20140114180518/http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/topics/fgm/overview/en/ ''Classification of female genital mutilation''], Geneva: World Health Organization, 2014.}}
*{{wikicite|ref=CEDAW2013|reference=[https://web.archive.org/web/20131003080552/http://www.scottishhumanrights.com/application/resources/documents/ConcObsCEDAW.doc "Concluding observations on the seventh periodic report of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland"], United Nations Committee on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW), 26 July 2013 ([https://www.webcitation.org/6p7HVdDRp?url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131003080552/http://www.scottishhumanrights.com/application/resources/documents/ConcObsCEDAW.doc WebCite]).}}
*{{wikicite|ref=Diop2008|reference = Diop, Nafissatou J.; Moreau, Amadou; Benga, Hélène. [http://www.unicef.org/wcaro/wcaro_SEN_TOSTAN_EarlyMarriage.pdf "Evaluation of the Long-term Impact of the TOSTAN Program on the Abandonment of FGM/C and Early Marriage: Results from a qualitative study in Senega"], UNICEF, January 2008.}}
*{{wikicite|ref=UNICEFDjibouti2013|reference=[https://web.archive.org/web/20141030110609/http://data.unicef.org/corecode/uploads/document6/uploaded_country_profiles/corecode/30/Countries/FGMC_DJI.pdf "Djibouti"], Statistical profile on female genital mutilation/cutting, UNICEF, December 2013.}}
*{{wikicite|ref=WHO2008|reference = [http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2008/9789241596442_eng.pdf ''Eliminating Female genital mutilation: An Interagency Statement''], Geneva: World Health Organization, 2008.}}
*{{wikicite|ref=UNICEFEritrea|reference=[https://web.archive.org/web/20141030113629/http://data.unicef.org/corecode/uploads/document6/uploaded_country_profiles/corecode/30/Countries/FGMC_ERI.pdf "Eritrea"], Statistical profile on female genital mutilation/cutting, UNICEF, July 2014.}}
*{{wikicite|ref=WHO2018|reference=[http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs241/en/ "Female genital mutilation"], Geneva: World Health Organization, 31 January 2018.}}
*{{wikicite|ref=UNICEF2016|reference = [http://www.unicef.org/media/files/FGMC_2016_brochure_final_UNICEF_SPREAD.pdf ''Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting: A Global Concern''], New York: United Nations Children's Fund, February 2016.}}
*{{wikicite| ref=WHO2005 |reference = [https://web.archive.org/web/20140428022806/http://www.who.int/gender/other_health/teachersguide.pdf ''Female Genital Mutilation: A Teachers' Guide''], Geneva: World Health Organization, 2005.}}
<!--*{{cite book|title=Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting: A statistical overview and exploration of the dynamics of change|url=http://data.unicef.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/FGMC_Lo_res_Final_26.pdf|publisher=UNICEF|location=New York|date=2013}}-->
*{{wikicite|ref=UNICEF2014|reference = [https://www.unicef.org/media/files/FGM-C_Report_7_15_Final_LR.pdf ''Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting: What Might the Future Hold?''], New York: UNICEF, 22 July 2014.}}
*{{wikicite|ref=UNICEFpress2July2007|reference=[https://www.unicef.org/media/media_40168.html<!--https://web.archive.org/web/20080520160125/http://www.unicef.org/egypt/media_3875.html--> "Fresh progress toward the elimination of female genital mutilation and cutting in Egypt"], UNICEF press release, 2 July 2007.}}
*{{wikicite|ref=UN2010|reference = [http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/70264/1/WHO_RHR_10.9_eng.pdf ''Global strategy to stop health-care providers from performing female genital mutilation''], UNAIDS, UNDP, UNFPA, UNHCR, UNICEF, UNIFEM, WHO, FIGO, ICN, IOM, MWIA, WCPT, WMA, Geneva: World Health Organization, 2010.}}
*{{wikicite|ref=UNICEFIndonesia2016|reference = [https://data.unicef.org/wp-content/uploads/country_profiles/Indonesia/FGMC_IDN.pdf "Indonesia"], Statistical profile on female genital mutilation/cutting, UNICEF, February 2016.}}
*{{wikicite|ref=UNresolution2012|reference=[http://www.un.org/en/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/67/146 "67/146. Intensifying global efforts for the elimination of female genital mutilations"], United Nations General Assembly, adopted 20 December 2012.}}
*{{wikicite| ref=IzettToubia1932 |reference = Izett, Susan; Toubia, Nahid. [https://web.archive.org/web/20130921053613/https://apps.who.int/dsa/cat98/fgmbook.htm ''Female Genital Mutilation: An Overview''], Geneva: World Health Organization, 1998.}}
*{{wikicite|ref=UNFPA2013|reference = ''Joint Evaluation. UNFPA-UNICEF Joint Program on Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting: Accelerating Change, 2008–2012'', [http://www.unfpa.org/sites/default/files/admin-resource/FGM-report%2012_4_2013.pdf Volume 1], [http://www.unfpa.org/sites/default/files/admin-resource/FGMC_Final%20Evaluation%20Report_Volume%20II_September09.pdf Volume 2], [http://www.unfpa.org/sites/default/files/admin-resource/ENG_FGM%20executive%20summary%20proof%205.pdf "Executive Summary"], New York: UNFPA, UNICEF, September 2013.}}
*{{wikicite|ref=UNFPA–UNICEF2012|reference = [http://www.unfpa.org/sites/default/files/pub-pdf/UNICEF-UNFPA%20Joint%20Programme%20AR_final_v14.pdf ''Joint Program on Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting: Accelerating Change''], Annual report 2012, New York: UNFPA–UNICEF, 2012.}}
*{{wikicite|ref=MackieLeJeune2008|reference=Mackie, Gerry; LeJeune, John. [https://web.archive.org/web/20131014151512/http://www.polisci.ucsd.edu/~gmackie/documents/UNICEF.pdf "Social Dynamics of Abandonment of Harmful Practices: A New Look at the Theory"], Innocenti Working Paper No. XXX, Florence: UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre, 2008.}}
*{{wikicite| ref=UNICEF2005 |reference = Miller, Michael; Moneti, Francesca. [http://www.unicef-irc.org/publications/pdf/fgm_eng.pdf ''Changing a harmful social convention: Female genital cutting/mutilation''], Florence: UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre, 2005.}}
*{{wikicite|ref=UNICEF2010|reference = Moneti, Francesca; Parker, David. [http://www.unicef-irc.org/publications/pdf/fgm_insight_eng.pdf ''The Dynamics of Social Change''], Florence: UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre, October 2010.}}
*{{wikicite|ref=UNICEFNigeria|reference=[https://data.unicef.org/wp-content/uploads/country_profiles/Nigeria/FGMC_NGA.pdf "Nigeria"], Statistical profile on female genital mutilation/cutting, UNICEF, July 2014.}}
*{{wikicite|ref=UNICEFSomalia|reference=[https://data.unicef.org/wp-content/uploads/country_profiles/Somalia/FGMC_SOM.pdf "Somalia"], Statistical profile on female genital mutilation/cutting, UNICEF, December 2013.}}
*{{wikicite|ref=WHO2016|reference = [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK368483/ ''WHO Guidelines on the Management of Health Complications from Female Genital Mutilation''], Geneva: World Health Organization, 2016. {{PMID|27359024}}}}
{{refend}}

==Further reading==
* [https://www.premiumtimesng.com/news/headlines/578531-fgm-survivors-narrate-experiences-dealing-with-absence-of-the-clitoris.html FGM: Survivors narrate experiences dealing with absence of the clitoris.]
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20150702080920/http://www.kinseyinstitute.org/library/Pdf/CIRCUMCISION%2C%20FEMALE1960-1980.pdf "Circumcision, female"], The Kinsey Institute (bibliography 1960s–1980s).
* [https://www.theguardian.com/society/female-genital-mutilation FGM archive], ''The Guardian''.
* Haworth, Abigail (18 November 2012). [https://www.theguardian.com/society/2012/nov/18/female-genital-mutilation-circumcision-indonesia "The day I saw 248 girls suffering genital mutilation"], ''The Observer''.
* Lightfoot-Klein, Hanny (1989). ''Prisoners of Ritual: An Odyssey Into Female Genital Circumcision in Africa''. New York: Routledge.
* Westley, David M. (1999). [https://web.archive.org/web/20100706041625/http://ir.uiowa.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1009&context=ejab "Female circumcision and infibulation in Africa"], ''Electronic Journal of Africana Bibliography'', 4 (bibliography up to 1997).

'''Personal stories'''
* El Saadawi, Nawal (1975). ''Woman at Point Zero''. London: Zed Books.
* Dirie, Waris and Miller, Cathleen (1998). ''Desert Flower''. New York: William Morrow.
* Kassindja, Fauziya and Miller-Muro, Layli (1998). ''Do They Hear You When You Cry''. New York: Delacorte Press.
* Ali, Ayaan Hirsi (2007). ''Infidel: My Life''. New York: Simon & Schuster.

==External links==

{{Violence against women/end}}
{{Urogenital surgical and other procedures}}

{{DEFAULTSORT:Female genital mutilation}}
[[Category:Wikipedia medicine articles ready to translate]]

{{Sourceattribution|Female genital mutilation}}