View source for Net Neutrality Regulation 2015

{{Net neutrality}}
The '''Net Neutrality Regulation 2015''' ([http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32015R2120&rid=2 No 2015/2120]) is a Regulation in EU law where article 3(3) lays down measures concerning open internet access. 

The regulation's text has been criticized as offering loopholes that can undermine the regulation's effectiveness.<ref name=guardianeu>{{cite news|last1=Hern|first1=Alex|title=EU net neutrality laws fatally undermined by loopholes, critics say|url=https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2015/oct/27/eu-net-neutrality-laws-fatally-undermined-by-loopholes-critics-say|accessdate=16 February 2016|work=The Guardian|date=27 October 2015|url-status=live|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20160213124554/http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2015/oct/27/eu-net-neutrality-laws-fatally-undermined-by-loopholes-critics-say|archivedate=13 February 2016|df=dmy-all}}</ref> Some [[Social:European Union|European Union]] member countries, such as Slovenia and the Netherlands, have stronger [[Net neutrality|net neutrality]] laws. 

==Regulation history==
The 2002 regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services in the European Union consisted of five directives, which are referred to as "the Framework Directive and the Specific Directives":{{citation needed|date=May 2014}}
* Access Directive (Directive 2002/19/EC)
* Authorization Directive (Directive 2002/20/EC)
* Framework Directive (Directive 2002/21/EC)
* Universal Service Directive (Directive 2002/22/EC)
* Directive on privacy and electronic communications (Directive 2002/58/EC)

When the European Commission consulted on the updating of the Framework Directive and the Specific Directives in November 2007, it examined the possible need for legislation to mandate network neutrality, countering the potential damage, if any, caused by non-neutral broadband access. The European Commission stated that prioritisation "is generally considered to be beneficial for the market so long as users have choice to access the transmission capabilities and the services they want" and "consequently, the current EU rules allow operators to offer different services to different customers groups, but not allow those who are in a dominant position to discriminate in an anti-competitive manner between customers in similar circumstances".<ref>{{cite web |url=http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/policy/ecomm/doc/library/proposals/1472/comm_pdf_sec_2007_1472_1_en_documentdetravail.pdf.pdf|title=Impact Assessment on the proposals to amend the European regulatory framework (Working Document – SEC(2007) 1472) |accessdate=26 December 2008 |author=European Commission |date=13 November 2007 |page=91}}</ref> 

However, the European Commission highlighted that Europe's current legal framework cannot effectively prevent network operators from degrading their customers' services. Therefore, the European Commission proposed that it should be empowered to impose a minimum quality of services requirements.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/policy/ecomm/doc/library/proposals/698/com_2007_0698_en.pdf|title=Article 22 of the proposed Universal Service Directive|work=Digital Agenda for Europe|accessdate=14 September 2014}}</ref> In addition, an obligation of transparency was proposed to limit network operators' ability to set up restrictions on end-users' choice of lawful content and applications.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/policy/ecomm/doc/library/proposals/698/com_2007_0698_en.pdf|title=Article 20(5) of the proposed Universal Service Directive|work=Digital Agenda for Europe|accessdate=14 September 2014}}</ref>

On 19 December 2009, the so-called "[[Telecoms Package]]" came into force and EU member states were required to implement the Directive by May 2011.<ref name="Eur-Lex.Europa.eu">{{cite web|url=http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2009:337:FULL:EN:PDF |title=Eur-Lex.Europa.eu |accessdate=23 June 2011}}</ref><ref name="businessweek1">{{cite web|last=Meyer |first=David |url=http://www.businessweek.com/globalbiz/content/may2009/gb2009057_886976.htm?chan=top+news_top+news+index+-+temp_global+business |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090509184343/http://www.businessweek.com/globalbiz/content/may2009/gb2009057_886976.htm?chan=top+news_top+news+index+-+temp_global+business |url-status=dead |archive-date=May 9, 2009 |title=Europe Votes Sweeping Telecom Reform |work=Bloomberg BusinessWeek |date=7 May 2009 |accessdate=23 June 2011}}</ref> According to the European Commission the new transparency requirements in the Telecoms Package would mean that "consumers will be informed—even before signing a contract—about the nature of the service to which they are subscribing, including traffic management techniques and their impact on service quality, as well as any other limitations (such as bandwidth caps or available connection speed)".<ref name="businessweek1"/> Regulation (EC) No 1211/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009 established the Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications (BEREC) and the Office<ref>{{cite web|url=http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2009:337:FULL:EN:PDF |title=Eur-Les.Europa.eu |accessdate=23 June 2011}}</ref> Body of European Regulators of Electronic Communications. BEREC's main purpose is to promote cooperation between national regulatory authorities, ensuring a consistent application of the EU regulatory framework for electronic communications.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2002:248:0001:0048:EN:PDF |title=Eur-Lex.Europa.eu |accessdate=23 June 2011}}</ref>

The European Parliament voted the EU Commission's September 2013 proposal on its first reading in April 2014 and the Council adopted a mandate to negotiate in March 2015. Following the adoption of the Digital Single Market Strategy by the Commission on 6 May, Heads of State and Government agreed on the need to strengthen the EU telecoms single market. After 18 months of negotiations, the European Parliament, Council and Commission reached two agreements on the end to roaming charges and on the first EU-wide rules on net neutrality on 30 June 2015,<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/MEMO_15_5275|title=Roaming charges and open Internet: questions and answers|date=30 June 2015|website=European Commission}}</ref> to be completed by an  overhaul of EU telecoms rules in 2016.  Specifically, article 3 of EU Regulation 2015/2120<ref>{{cite web |url=http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32015R2120&rid=2|title=Regulation (EU) 2015/2120 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2015 laying down measures concerning open internet access and amending Directive 2002/22/EC on universal service and users' rights relating to electronic communications networks and services and Regulation (EU) No 531/2012 on roaming on public mobile communications networks within the Union |accessdate=16 February 2016 |author=European Parliament and the Council of the European Union |date=25 November 2015 |format=HTML }}</ref> sets the basic framework for ensuring net neutrality across the entire [[Social:European Union|European Union]]. However, the regulation's text has been criticized as offering loopholes that can undermine the regulation's effectiveness.<ref>{{cite news|last1=Hern|first1=Alex|title=EU net neutrality laws fatally undermined by loopholes, critics say|url=https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2015/oct/27/eu-net-neutrality-laws-fatally-undermined-by-loopholes-critics-say|accessdate=16 February 2016|work=The Guardian|date=27 October 2015}}</ref>

===National regulations===
The EU has laid down a framework on net neutrality, but some of EU states have stronger laws nationally, or are discussing passing them. However Neelie Kroes, former European Commissioner for Digital Agenda, has asked "national legislators and regulators to wait for better evidence before regulating on an uncoordinated, country-by-country basis that slows down the creation of a Digital Single Market".<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://ec.europa.eu/archives/commission_2010-2014/kroes/en/blog/netneutrality.html|title=Next steps on Net Neutrality - making sure you get champagne service if that's what you're paying for|website=European Commission|first=Neelie|last=Kroes|date=29 May 2012}}</ref>

{| class="wikitable"
|-
!width="100px"| Member State
!width="100px"| Situation
! Details
|-
|-
| {{BEL}}
| Under discussion
| In Belgium, net neutrality was discussed in the parliament in June 2011. Three parties (CD&V, N-VA & PS) jointly proposed a text to introduce the concept of net neutrality in the telecom law.<ref>[http://www.dekamer.be/FLWB/PDF/53/1467/53K1467002.pdf proposition 53 1467/002] dekamer.be, 27 August 2011</ref>
|-
| {{FRA}}
| Under discussion
| In France, on 12 April 2011, the Commission for economic affairs of the French parliament approved the report of MP Laure de La Raudière (UMP). The report contains<ref>[http://www.assemblee-nationale.fr/13/dossiers/neutralite_internet_reseaux.asp rapport de La Raudière] asseblee-nationale.fr, 27 August 2011</ref> 9 proposals. Propositions n°1 & 2 act on net neutrality.
|-
| {{ITA}}
| Under discussion
| In March 2009, the following bill was put forward: ''Proposta di legge dei senatori Vincenzo VITA (PD) e Luigi Vimercati (PD)'', "Neutralità Delle Reti, Free Software E Societa' Dell'informazione".<ref>{{cite web|url=http://punto-informatico.it/2591643/PI/Interviste/ci-vuole-una-legge-rete.aspx |title=PI: Ci vuole una legge per la Rete |publisher=Punto-informatico.it |date=7 February 1996 |accessdate=23 June 2011}}</ref> 
Senator Vimercati in an interview said that he wants "to do something for the network neutrality" and that he was inspired by Lawrence Lessig, Professor at the Stanford Law School. Vimercati said that the topic is very hard, but in the article 3 there is a reference to the concept of neutrality regard the contents. It is also a problem of transparency and for the mobile connections: we need the minimum bandwidth to guarantee the service. We need some principle to defend the consumers. It's important that the consumer has been informed if he could not access all the Internet.

The bill refuses all the discrimination: related by the content, the service and the device. The bill is generally about Internet ("a statute for the Internet") and treat different topics like network neutrality, free software, giving an Internet access to everyone.
|-
| {{NLD}}<br/>
| Law passed 2012
On June 4, 2012, the Netherlands became the first country in Europe and the second in the world, after Chile, to enact a network neutrality law.<ref name=stb-2012-235>{{cite journal |title=''Wet van 10 mei 2012 tot wijziging van de Telecommunicatiewet ter implementatie van de herziene telecommunicatierichtlijnen'' |trans-title=Act of 10 May 2012 for the amendment of the Telecomminications Act for the implementation of the revised telecommunications directives |journal=Staatsblad van het Koninkrijk der Nederlanden |date=4 June 2012 |volume=2012 |issue=235 |url=https://zoek.officielebekendmakingen.nl/stb-2012-235.html |accessdate=10 February 2014 |language=Dutch |url-status=live |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20140413181820/https://zoek.officielebekendmakingen.nl/stb-2012-235.html |archivedate=13 April 2014 |df=dmy-all }}</ref><ref name=guardian20110623>[https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2011/jun/23/netherlands-enshrines-net-neutrality-law "Net neutrality enshrined in Dutch law"] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130930112646/http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2011/jun/23/netherlands-enshrines-net-neutrality-law |date=30 September 2013 }}. ''The Guardian'' (London). Associated Press. 23 June 2011. Retrieved 3 April 2014.</ref><ref name=eff20120521>{{cite web|title=The Netherlands Passes Net Neutrality Legislation|url=https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2012/05/netherlands-passes-net-neutrality-legislation|publisher=Electronic Frontier Foundation|accessdate=10 February 2014|date=21 May 2012|url-status=live|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20131014150959/https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2012/05/netherlands-passes-net-neutrality-legislation|archivedate=14 October 2013|df=dmy-all}}</ref> The main provision of the law requires that "Providers of public electronic communication networks used to provide Internet access services as well as providers of Internet access services will not hinder or slow down services or applications on the Internet".<ref name=Telecommunicatiewet7.4a>{{cite web |title=wetten.nl - ''Wet- en regelgeving - Telecommunicatiewet - BWBR0009950'' |trans-title=wetten.nl - Laws and policies - Telecommunications Act - BWBR0009950 |url=http://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0009950/Hoofdstuk7/Artikel74a/geldigheidsdatum_10-02-2014 |accessdate=10 February 2014 |language=Dutch |at=Article 7.4a |url-status=dead |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20150315105419/http://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0009950/Hoofdstuk7/Artikel74a/geldigheidsdatum_10-02-2014 |archivedate=15 March 2015 |df=dmy-all }}</ref>

|-
| {{SLO}}
| Law passed 2012
| At the end of 2012, Slovenia legislated a law of electronic communication implementing a strong principle of net neutrality.<ref>{{Cite web|title = Uradni list Republike Slovenije|url = https://www.uradni-list.si/1/content?id=111442|website = www.uradni-list.si|accessdate = 2015-10-10|url-status = live|archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20151006163114/http://www.uradni-list.si/1/content?id=111442|archivedate = 6 October 2015|df = dmy-all}}</ref> Slovenia thus became the second country in Europe to enact a net neutrality law. The Government Agency for Communications, Networks and Services (AKOS) is enforcing the law and executes inspections. In January 2015 it found [[Zero-rating|zero-rating]] infringements at the two largest mobile network providers, Telekom and Simobil (now A1).<ref>{{Cite web|title = AKOS: Telekom Slovenije in Simobil kršila nevtralnost interneta @ Slo-Tech|url = https://slo-tech.com/novice/t634024|website = slo-tech.com|access-date = 2016-01-14|url-status = live|archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20160304035044/https://slo-tech.com/novice/t634024|archivedate = 4 March 2016|df = dmy-all}}</ref> In February it found similar infringaments also at Amis<ref>{{Cite web|title = AKOS's decision no. 06101-1412/2014/4 of 20 February 2014|url = http://www.akos-rs.si/odlocba-06101-1412-2014-4|website = akos-rs.si|access-date = 2016-07-19|url-status = live|archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20160918014647/http://www.akos-rs.si/odlocba-06101-1412-2014-4|archivedate = 18 September 2016|df = dmy-all}}</ref> (now Simobil) and Tušmobil<ref>{{Cite web|title = AKOS's decision no. 06101-1413/2014/4 of 20 February 2014|url = http://www.akos-rs.si/odlocba-06101-1413-2014-4|website = akos-rs.si|access-date = 2016-07-19|url-status = live|archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20160918010109/http://www.akos-rs.si/odlocba-06101-1413-2014-4|archivedate = 18 September 2016|df = dmy-all}}</ref> (now Telemach). In July 2016 the Administrative Court of the Republic of Slovenia annulled the decisions of AKOS.<ref>{{Cite web|title = Slovenia strikes down ban on zero rating, upholds rule of law|url = http://www.techpolicydaily.com/communications/slovenia-zero-rating-rule-law/
|website = techpolicydaily.com|access-date = 2016-07-20|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161012095828/http://www.techpolicydaily.com/communications/slovenia-zero-rating-rule-law/| publisher=American Enterprise Institute|archive-date=2016-10-12|url-status= dead}}</ref>
|}

==Potential violations==
In 2007, the British ISP Plusnet was using [[Social:Deep packet inspection|deep packet inspection]] to implement limits and differential charges for peer-to-peer, file transfer protocol, and online game traffic.<ref>{{cite web |last=Anderson |first=Nate |url=https://arstechnica.com/hardware/news/2007/07/Deep-packet-inspection-meets-net-neutrality.ars/2 |title=Deep packet inspection meets 'Net neutrality, CALEA |website=Ars Technica |date=25 July 2007 |accessdate=23 June 2011 |url-status=live |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20110419235908/http://arstechnica.com/hardware/news/2007/07/Deep-packet-inspection-meets-net-neutrality.ars/2 |archivedate=19 April 2011 |df=dmy-all }}</ref> However, their network management philosophy was made clear for each package they sold, and was consistent between different websites.<ref>{{cite web|url= http://www.plus.net/support/broadband/speed_guide/traffic_management.shtml|website= PlusNet|title= Broadband All about traffic management|url-status= live|archiveurl= https://web.archive.org/web/20141129021315/http://www.plus.net/support/broadband/speed_guide/traffic_management.shtml|archivedate= 29 November 2014|df= dmy-all}}</ref>

In 2017, Germany mobile network operators like Deutsche Telekom and Vodafone were offering services that seemed to affect net neutrality. The government agency overseeing the market (Bundesnetzagentur) stated, in general these plans are in alignment with net neutrality but forced the companies to adopt some changes. <ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.faz.net/1.5342660|title=Behörde verlangt: Telekom muss "Stream On"-Tarif verändern|newspaper=Faz.net |date=15 December 2017|publisher=|via=www.faz.net}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.sueddeutsche.de/digital/netzneutralitaet-in-deutschland-auch-in-deutschland-ist-die-netzneutralitaet-durchloechert-1.3791748|title=Auch in Deutschland ist die Netzneutralität durchlöchert|first1=Mirjam|last1=Hauck|first2=Helmut|last2=Martin-Jung|date=17 December 2017|publisher=|via=Sueddeutsche.de}}</ref>

==Criticism==
European net neutrality law has been criticised for leaving too many loopholes to be exploited, as amendments to close them failed to gain enough support across the European Parliament. Some loopholes include the ability to offer priority to "specialised services", provided they still treat the "open" internet equally. Such services included [[Medicine:Remote surgery|remote surgery]], driverless cars and anti-terrorism efforts. The law does say that these services cannot be offered if they restrict bandwidth for normal users. Another exemption is giving websites a "[[Zero-rating]]", not counting a website against a user's data limits, giving an advantage to those sites when being viewed via a metered connection.<ref name=guardianeu/><ref name="misunderstanding">
*{{cite web|last1=Rittiman|first1=Brandon|title=Verify: What does Portugal have to do with U.S. dumping net neutrality?|url=http://www.9news.com/news/local/verify/verify-what-does-portugal-have-to-do-with-us-dumping-net-neutrality-/494021679|website=KUSA|publisher=NBC|date=22 November 2017}}
*{{cite web|last1=Rousselle|first1=Christine|title=This Viral Tweet About Net Neutrality is Fake News|url=https://townhall.com/tipsheet/christinerousselle/2017/11/24/viral-tweet-about-net-neutrality-is-fake-news-n2413348|website=Townhall|language=en|date=24 November 2017}}
*{{cite web|last1=Millard|first1=Taylor|title=Why the Portuguese argument for Net Neutrality doesn't work |url=https://hotair.com/archives/2017/11/26/portuguese-argument-net-neutrality-doesnt-work/|website=Hot Air|publisher=[[Company:Salem Media Group|Salem Media Group]]|date=26 November 2017}}
*{{cite web|last1=Emery|first1=David|title=FACT CHECK: Is Portugal an Example of What Happens Without Net Neutrality?|url=https://www.snopes.com/portugal-net-neutrality/|website=[[Philosophy:Snopes.com|Snopes.com]]|date=4 December 2017}}
</ref>

==See also==
*EU law
*Digital Single Market
*[[Telecoms Package]]
*[[Net neutrality]]

==References==
{{reflist|2}}

==External links==
* [https://ec.europa.eu/commission/priorities/digital-single-market_en Digital single market], European Commission
* [https://ec.europa.eu/commission/commissioners/2014-2019/oettinger/blog/net-neutrality-single-rulebook-single-digital-market_en Net neutrality: A single rulebook for a single digital market], European Commission
* [http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ%3AC%3A2009%3A308%3A0002%3A0002%3AEN%3APDF Commission declaration on net neutrality], European Commission

[[Category:Internet access]]

{{Sourceattribution|Net Neutrality Regulation 2015}}