View source for Philosophy:Drive reduction theory (learning theory)

{{Citations needed|date=December 2020}}
'''Drive reduction theory''', developed by Clark Hull in 1943, is a major theory of motivation in the behaviorist [[Philosophy:Learning theory (education)|learning theory]] tradition.<ref>Dewey, R. (2007). Psychology: An introduction. Retrieved from http://www.intropsych.com/index.html</ref> "Drive" is defined as motivation that arises due to a psychological or physiological need.<ref>Hull, C.L. (1952). A behavior system. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.</ref> It works as an internal stimulus that motivates an individual to sate the drive.<ref name=":0">Deckers, Lambert (2018). Motivation Biological, Psychological, and Environmental. New York, NY: Routledge. pp. 57–60. {{ISBN|978-1-138-03632-1}}.</ref> It has also been described as an internal and instinctual process that moves individuals to take actions that would allow them to attain their desired goal or end-state.<ref>Lambert, Deckers, (2018). Motivation biological, psychological, and environmental  (5th edition ed.). New York: Routledge. pp. 42–43. {{ISBN|9781351713887}}. {{OCLC|1022784633}}.</ref> Simply put, drive reduction theory suggests that when humans experience a physiological or psychological need, such as reducing hunger or boredom, they feel a drive to satisfy that need.

== Details ==
According to such theorists as Clark Hull and Kenneth Spence, drive reduction is a major force behind learning and behavior. Primary drives are innate drives (e.g., thirst, hunger, and sex), whereas secondary drives are learned by conditioning (e.g., money). Doris Kraeling and Byron Campbell conducted experiments to determine if “reduction would be more effective as a reinforcer if the initial drive were low than if the initial drive were high.” Their findings were that “changes in stimuli are more discriminable at low levels of stimulus intensity than at higher levels of stimulus intensity.” <ref>{{cite journal |last1=Campbell |first1=BA |last2=Kraeling |first2=D |title=Response strength as a function of drive level and amount of drive reduction |journal=Journal of Experimental Psychology |date=February 1953 |volume=45 |issue=2 |pages=97–101 |doi=10.1037/h0060223 |pmid=13052836 }}</ref> Multiple drives result when an organism is faced with more than one need simultaneously. Research has shown that this condition affects learning.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Wike |first1=EL |last2=Barrientos |first2=G |title=Secondary reinforcement and multiple drive reduction. |journal=Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology |date=October 1958 |volume=51 |issue=5 |pages=640–643 |doi=10.1037/h0047699 |pmid=13587701 }}</ref>

There are also the complications to drive reduction theory caused by so-called "pleasure-seeking" behaviors, which seem to be contradictory to the theory's precepts. Why would an individual actively seek out more stimulation if it is already in a state of relaxation and fulfillment? A good example is when an individual leaves home to go to a potentially dangerous carnival. There is no base physiological drive to go to the carnival, but the individual exhausts resources to go there. Judson Brown attempts to explain this phenomenon, saying, "the sensory consequences of most responses are practically never intense enough to provide increments to the drive level."<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Brown |first1=Judson S. |title=Pleasure-seeking behavior and the drive-reduction hypothesis |journal=Psychological Review |date=1955 |volume=62 |issue=3 |pages=169–179 |doi=10.1037/h0047034 |pmid=14371895 }}</ref>

== Motivational readiness ==

An expansion on the drive-incentive link, developed by Warden, states that an individual's physiological needs will be coupled with a proportionate drive.<ref name=":0" /> Affordances are the available resources present in an individual's environment; these would be at their disposal to use to obtain their desired end-state. The individual's environment, in which the affordances are located, is similar to Lewin's living space.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Lewin |first1=Kurt |title=Principles of topological psychology |date=1936 |publisher=McGraw-Hill |oclc=916125511 |doi=10.1037/10019-000 }}{{pn|date=April 2021}}</ref> The level of effectiveness and affordance depends on what the want is. The affordance properties need to be able to suit the characteristics needed for the want to be fulfilled.<ref name=":1">Deckers, Lambert (2018). Motivation Biological, Psychological, and Environmental. New York, NY: Routledge. pp. 50–53. {{ISBN|978-1-138-03632-1}}.</ref> For example, an individual whose want is shelter from a hail storm would not be satisfied if the affordance given was a miniature sized bag of gummy worms. Additionally, based on Warden's drive-incentive link, as either the drive or incentive increases, the behavior also increases.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Warden |first1=Carl John |chapter=The Columbia Obstruction Method |pages=3–16 |chapter-url=https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.506367/page/n17/mode/1up |title=Animal Motivation: Experimental Studies on the Albino Rat |date=1931 |publisher=Columbia University Press |isbn=978-0-598-38190-3 }}</ref> According to Hull, due to the interconnected properties of drive and motivation, in the presence of a drive, the discomfort of the individual increases; this discomfort gives them the motivation to dispel the need at the core of the drive.<ref name=":1" />

The emergence of the theory of motivational readiness comes from previous attempts to explain how internal and external sources interact to influence motivation and behavior. This theory is dependent on the notion that individuals will have a want and that they will take actions to obtain the want (assuming that is actually obtainable).<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Kruglanski |first1=Arie W. |last2=Chernikova |first2=Marina |last3=Rosenzweig |first3=Emily |last4=Kopetz |first4=Catalina |title=On motivational readiness |journal=Psychological Review |date=July 2014 |volume=121 |issue=3 |pages=367–388 |doi=10.1037/a0037013 |pmid=25090424 }}</ref> Wants can be any physiological or psychological need, such as the need for food; as an example, an individual can drive to a diner with the expectation that their hunger will be satiated by the food there.

Motivational readiness has been prominent in studies involving exercise,<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Pinto |first1=Bernardine M. |last2=Lynn |first2=Henry |last3=Marcus |first3=Bess H. |last4=DePue |first4=Judith |last5=Goldstein |first5=Michael G. |title=Physician-based activity counseling: Intervention effects on mediators of motivational readiness for physical activity |journal=Annals of Behavioral Medicine |date=1 February 2001 |volume=23 |issue=1 |pages=2–10 |doi=10.1207/S15324796ABM2301_2 |pmid=11302351 |s2cid=3681805 |doi-access=free }}</ref> weight control, diet, and smoking.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Marcus |first1=Bess H. |last2=Rakowski |first2=William |last3=Rossi |first3=Joseph S. |title=Assessing motivational readiness and decision making for exercise |journal=Health Psychology |date=1992 |volume=11 |issue=4 |pages=257–261 |doi=10.1037/0278-6133.11.4.257 |pmid=1396494 }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Bock |first1=B. C. |last2=Marcus |first2=B. H. |last3=Rossi |first3=J. S. |last4=Redding |first4=C. A. |year=1998 |title=Motivational readiness for change: Diet, exercise, and smoking |journal=American Journal of Health Behavior |volume=22 |issue=4 |pages=248–258 }}</ref>

==See also==
* [[Philosophy:Yerkes–Dodson law|Yerkes–Dodson law]] of performance and arousal
* [[Philosophy:Motivation#Incentive theory|Incentive theory]] of motivation

==References==
{{reflist}}

==Further reading==
* {{cite journal |last1=Wolpe |first1=J |title=Need-reduction, drive-reduction, and reinforcement; a neurophysiological view |journal=Psychological Review |date=January 1950 |volume=57 |issue=1 |pages=19–26 |doi=10.1037/h0055810 |pmid=15409077 }}
* {{cite journal |last1=Seward |first1=JP |title=Drive, incentive, and reinforcement |journal=Psychological Review |date=May 1956 |volume=63 |issue=3 |pages=195–203 |doi=10.1037/h0048229 |pmid=13323175 }}
* {{cite journal |last1=Mowrer |first1=OH |last2=Solomon |first2=LN |title=Contiguity vs. drive-reduction in conditioned fear: the proximity and abruptness of drive-reduction |journal=The American Journal of Psychology |date=March 1954 |volume=67 |issue=1 |pages=15–25 |doi=10.2307/1418068 |jstor=1418068 |pmid=13138766 }}
* {{cite journal |last1=Leuba |first1=Clarence |title=Toward Some Integration of Learning Theories: The Concept of Optimal Stimulation |journal=Psychological Reports |date=1 March 1955 |volume=1 |issue=1 |pages=27–33 |doi=10.2466/pr0.1955.1.g.27 |s2cid=144546093 }}
* {{cite journal |last1=Harlow |first1=HF |title=Mice, monkeys, men, and motives |journal=Psychological Review |date=January 1953 |volume=60 |issue=1 |pages=23–32 |doi=10.1037/h0056040 |pmid=13037933 }}

[[Category:Motivation]]

{{Sourceattribution|Drive reduction theory (learning theory)}}