View source for Religion:Hirabah

{{short description|Arabic term for piracy}}
{{Fiqh |criminal}}
In [[Religion:Sharia|Islamic law]], '''''hirabah''''' is a legal category that comprises highway robbery (traditionally understood as aggravated robbery or grand larceny, unlike theft, which has a different punishment), [[Medicine:Rape|rape]], and [[Social:Terrorism|terrorism]].<ref name="jav"/> '''Ḥirābah''' ({{lang-ar|حرابة}}) is an [[Social:Arabic|Arabic]] word for 'piracy', or 'unlawful warfare'. It comes from the triliteral root ''ḥrb'', which means “to become angry and enraged”. The noun ''ḥarb'' ({{lang|ar|حَرْب}}, pl. ''ḥurūb'' {{lang|ar|حُروب}}) means 'war' or 'wars'.<ref name="Crane">Crane, Robert D., “[http://www.irfi.org/articles/articles_301_350/hirabah_versus_jihad.htm Hirabah versus Jihad]”, ''IFRI.org'' (Islamic Research Foundation International, Inc., 2006)</ref>

''Moharebeh'' (also spelled ''muharebeh'') is a Persian term that is treated as interchangeable with ''ḥirabah'' in Arabic lexicons.{{sfnp|Amin|2014|page=133}} The related term ''muḥārib''  ({{lang|ar|محارب}}) (perpetrator of ''muḥāribah'') has been translated by English language Iranian media as "enemy of God".<ref name=la>{{cite web|first=Borzou|last=Daragahi|title=Iran executes 2 alleged government opponents |url=http://www.latimes.com/news/nation-and-world/la-fg-iran-executions29-2010jan29,0,6488228.story |date=29 January 2010|work=Los Angeles Times|access-date=29 January 2010}}</ref><ref name="auto2">{{cite web|url=https://www.tehrantimes.com/news/213354/Trial-of-16-Ashura-riot-detainees-begins-in-Iran |title=Trial of 16 Ashura riot detainees begins in Iran|website=Tehran Times|date=31 January 2010}}</ref><ref name=":0">{{cite web |url=https://www.un.org/Depts/los/LEGISLATIONANDTREATIES/PDFFILES/IRN_national_legislation.pdf |title= Maritime Space: Maritime Zones and Maritime Delimitation|access-date=11 December 2017}}</ref> In English-language media sources Moḥarebeh in Iran has been translated variously as "waging war against God,"<ref name="auto">{{cite web | title=Iran, With Opposition Protests Continuing, Executes More Prisoners |last=Fathi |first=Nazila| website=The New York Times | date=2010-02-02 | url=https://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/02/world/middleeast/02iran.html | access-date=2022-04-20}}</ref> "war against God and the state,"<ref name="auto1">[https://www.hrw.org/en/news/2009/11/10/iran-halt-execution-kurdish-activist Iran: Kurdish Activist Executed] 10 November 2009</ref> "enmity against God."<ref name="amnesty">{{cite web|url=https://www.amnesty.org/en/search/?contentType=2561|title=Turkmenistan|access-date=11 December 2017}}</ref><ref name="auto2"/> It is a capital crime in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and the Islamic Republic of Iran.

==Scriptural basis==
A verse from Qur'anic chapter ''al-ma'idah'' Q5:33 is known as "the ''Hirabah'' Verse" (''ayat al-hiraba''),<ref name=":1">{{Cite encyclopedia|author=El Fadl, Khaled Abou | year= 2006 | title=Rebellion|volume=4|encyclopedia=Encyclopaedia of the Qurʾān|editor=Jane Dammen McAuliffe|publisher=Brill|page=364|quote=Q 5:33 [...] The verse (known as āyat al-hirāba)}}</ref> specifies punishment for "those who wage war against God and His Messenger and strive to spread disorder in the land":<ref name="jav">[[Biography:Javed Ahmad Ghamidi|Javed Ahmad Ghamidi]], [[Religion:Mizan|Mizan]], ''[http://www.renaissance.com.pk/septfeart2y2.html The Penal Law of Islam]'', Al-Mawrid {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070127184245/http://www.renaissance.com.pk/septfeart2y2.html |date=2007-01-27 }}</ref>

<blockquote>The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger, and strive with might and main for mischief through the land is: execution, or crucifixion, or the cutting off of hands and feet from opposite sides, or exile from the land: that is their disgrace in this world, and a heavy punishment is theirs in the Hereafter; {{cite quran|5|33}}
</blockquote>

The verbal noun form (i.e. ''ḥirabah'') is frequently used in classical and modern books of Islamic jurisprudence, but neither the word ḥirabah nor the root verb ḥaraba occurs in the Quran.<ref>{{harvp|Amin|2014|page=[https://books.google.com/books?id=CTUrBgAAQBAJ&pg=PA133 133]}}. "Neither the word hirabah nor the root verb haraba occurs in the Quran, although the verbal noun form (i.e. hirabah) is frequently used in classical and modern books of Islamic jurisprudence."</ref> (''Yuḥāribūna'' is the form used in Quran 5:33-4.)

According to early Islamic sources, the verse was revealed after some members of the Urayna tribe feigned conversion to Islam in order to steal Muslims' possessions and killed a young shepherd sent to teach them about the faith. In view of the broad and strong language of the verse, however, various state representatives beginning with the Umayyads have asserted that it applied to rebels in general.<ref>{{Cite encyclopedia|author=El Fadl, Khaled Abou | year= 2006 | title=Rebellion|volume=4|encyclopedia=Encyclopaedia of the Qurʾān|editor=Jane Dammen McAuliffe|publisher=Brill|page=364}}</ref>

The original meanings of the triliteral root ''ḥrb'' are to despoil someones wealth or property, and also fighting or committing sinful act. The [[Religion:Quran|Quran]] "refers to both meanings" in verses 2:279 and 5:33-34.{{sfnp|Amin|2014|pages=132–133}}

==Crime==
According to [[Religion:Islam|Islam]]ic scholar Khaled Abou El Fadl,  ''Hiraba'' in the Islamic context literally means "waging war against society" and in [[Religion:Fiqh|Islamic jurisprudence]] traditionally referred to acts such as killing noncombatants ("the resident and wayfarer"), "assassinations, setting fires, or poisoning water wells," crimes "so serious and repugnant" that their perpetrators were "not to be given quarter or sanctuary anywhere."<ref>Abou El Fadl, Khaled, ''The Great Theft: Wrestling Islam from the Extremists'', by Khaled Abou El Fadl, Harper San Francisco, 2005, p.242</ref> Another source (Brian Murphy) states, "many Islamic scholars interpret the references to acts that defy universal codes such as intentionally killing civilians during [[Social:Warfare|warfare]] or causing random destruction."<ref name="murphy">[http://www.boston.com/news/world/middleeast/articles/2010/03/09/iran_calls_political_opponents_enemies_of_islam/ Iran calls political opponents enemies of Islam] By BRIAN MURPHY (AP) 9 March 2010| accessed 14 March 2012</ref> According to author Sadakat Kadri, "Most classical jurists" had  established "a thousand or so years ago" that Hiraba "referred specifically to banditry in open country: a uniquely destabilizing threat to civil order in a premodern society."<ref name=kadri-219/> The crime is sometimes lumped together with ''[[Religion:Fasad|fasād fi-l-ʾarḍ]]'' (spreading corruption in the land),<ref name=kadri-219>{{harvp|Kadri|2012|page=219}}. "Exposure from a cross is a punishment that the Qur'an authorizes for anyone who has `[made] war against God and His apostle` or `spread disorder in the land.` ... Most classical jurists had construed their definition with commensurate care, establishing a thousand or so years ago that they referred specifically to banditry in open country: a uniquely destabilizing threat to civil order in a premodern society."</ref><ref>{{Cite book | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ciLkDAAAQBAJ&q=moharebeh&pg=PA213 | title=Eradicating Terrorism from the Middle East: Policy and Administrative Approaches| isbn=9783319310183| last1=Dawoody| first1=Alexander R.| date=2016-08-22}}</ref> which is mentioned alongside waging "war against Allah and His Prophet" in 5:33-34.

===Rape===

The inclusion of rape within the purview of ''hirabah'' has had support throughout Islamic history.

The medieval Zahiri jurist [[Biography:Ibn Hazm|Ibn Hazm]] defined ''hirabah'' as,

<blockquote>‘One who puts people in fear on the road, whether or not with a weapon, at night or day, in urban areas or in open spaces, in the palace of a caliph or a mosque, with or without accomplices, in the desert or in the village, in a large or small city, with one or more people… making people fear that they’ll be killed, or have money taken, or be raped (hatk al ‘arad)… whether the attackers are one or many.'<ref name="Webb p.130">Webb, Gisella - ''Windows of Faith: Muslim Women Scholar-Activists in North America'' p.130</ref></blockquote>

It had significant support from the Maliki jurists.

<blockquote>Al-Dasuqi, for example, a Maliki jurist, held that if a person forced a woman to have sex, his actions would be deemed committing ''hiraba''.

In addition, the Maliki judge Ibn 'Arabi, relates a story in which a group was attacked and a woman in their party raped. Responding to the argument that the crime did not constitute ''hiraba'' because no money was taken and no weapons used, Ibn 'Arabi replied indignantly that "''hirabah'' with the private parts" is much worse than ''hiraba'' involving the taking of money, and that anyone would rather be subjected to the latter than the former.<ref name="Webb p.130"/></blockquote>

In the Hanafi school of law, the term ''zina'' is taken to refer to illegal sexual intercourse where rape is distinguished as ''zina bil jabr'' to indicate its forced and non-consensual nature whereas fornication and adultery fit ''zina bil ridha'', which indicates consent. Though the terminology uses the term ''zina'', nonetheless, they are two categorically different crimes as rape is treated as a ''tazeer'' (discretionary) crime by the judge and prosecuted based on circumstantial evidence (medical evidence, any number of witnesses, and other forensic evidence). In other words, very similar to how it is treated in contemporary Western law. It is fornication and adultery by mutual consent, or ''zina bil ridha'', which retain their classical ''hadd'' punishments from the Qur'an and [[Religion:Sunnah|sunnah]] provided there are four witnesses (absent which they too default to ''tazeer'', subject to discretionary punishments such as fining, imprisonment, or lashes). Nonetheless, gang rape or public rape, such as the sort that occurs during war, is still traditionally considered ''hirabah'' as that is more in line with its classical definition as a war crime or crime against civilization and society.<ref>Muhammad Taqi Usmani - [http://globalwebpost.com/farooqm/study_res/islam/fiqh/usmani_hudud.pdf The Islamization of Laws in Pakistan: The Case of Hudud Ordinances] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121021012906/http://globalwebpost.com/farooqm/study_res/islam/fiqh/usmani_hudud.pdf |date=2012-10-21 }}</ref>

==Punishment==
In keeping with the Quranic verse 5:33 quoted above, "most classical [Islamic] jurists" held that the penalty for ''muḥāribah'' was crucifixion ({{lang|ar|تصليب}}),  cross-amputation (amputation of right hand and left foot) or being banished from the earth ({{lang|ar|نفى}}).<ref name=affi-109>{{cite book|last1=Affi|first1=Ahmed|last2=Affi|first2=Hassan|title=Contemporary Interpretation of Islamic Law|date=2014|publisher=Troubador Publishing Ltd.|page=109 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=MhnPBQAAQBAJ&q=waging+war+on+god+crucifixion&pg=PA109|access-date=9 November 2015|quote= ... most classical jurists ... believe that the penalty for those who wage on God and His Apostle shall be that they are crucified, be subjected to cross-amputation or be banished from the earth.|isbn=9781783067596}}</ref><ref name=kadri-218>{{harvp|Kadri|2012|page=218}}. "Exposure from a cross is a punishment that the Quran authorizes for anyone who has '[made] war against God and His apostle' or 'spread disorder in the land.' It served historically to humiliate rather than kill, but it could be combined with execution, because the holy book acknowledged those crimes -- uniquely -- as capital offenses."</ref>

According to Sadakat Kadri the crimes of waging `war against God and His apostle` (Muḥāribah) and spreading `disorder in the land` (''[[Religion:Fasad|fasad fi-l-ard]]'') were originally punished either by exile or some combination of double amputation, beheading, and crucifixion (what Kadri calls "islam's equivalent of the hanging, drawing and quartering that medieval Europeans inflicted on traitors"). This was the only capital penalty permitted rulers by the [[Religion:Quran|Quran]] (in the case of murder the killer's fate was in the hands of the victim's next of kin not the judge){{sfnp|Kadri|2012|p=219}} during the early years of Islam "when enemies of the faith and political rebels often looked frighteningly similar" the crime had broader application including apostasy from Islam but was "gradually narrowed" to apply only to "highway robbery in the open county."{{sfnp|Kadri|2012|p=241}}

The choice of crucifixion and its method is subject to "complex and contested rules" in classical jurisprudence.<ref name=EI2>{{Cite encyclopedia|author=Vogel, F.E. | year= 2012 | title=Ṣalb |encyclopedia=Encyclopaedia of Islam| edition=2nd|publisher=Brill |editor=P. Bearman |editor2=Th. Bianquis |editor3=C.E. Bosworth |editor4=E. van Donzel |editor5=W.P. Heinrichs| doi= 10.1163/1573-3912_islam_SIM_6530 }}</ref> Most scholars required crucifixion for highway robbery combined with murder, while others allowed execution by other methods.<ref name=EI2/> The main methods of crucifixion are:

* Exposure of the culprit's body after execution by another method, ascribed to "most scholars"<ref name=EI2/><ref name=peters>{{Cite book |first=Rudolph|last=Peters| year=2006 | title=Crime and Punishment in Islamic Law: Theory and Practice from the Sixteenth to the Twenty-First Century|publisher=Cambridge University Press|pages=37–38}}</ref> and in particular to Ibn Hanbal and Al-Shafi'i;<ref name=EoF-taslib>{{cite encyclopedia |encyclopedia=الموسوعة الفقهية (Encyclopedia of Fiqh)|publisher=وزارة الأوقاف والشئون الإسلامية في دولة الكويت|url=https://archive.org/details/FPmfkmfk|language=ar|year=1988|volume=12|title=تصليب}}</ref> or Hanbalis and Shafi'is.<ref name=EoF-hiraba>{{cite encyclopedia|encyclopedia=الموسوعة الفقهية (Encyclopedia of Fiqh)|publisher=وزارة الأوقاف والشئون الإسلامية في دولة الكويت|url=https://archive.org/details/FPmfkmfk|language=ar|year=1988|volume=17|title=حرابة}}</ref>
* Crucifying the culprit alive, then executing him with a lance thrust or another method, ascribed to Malikis, most Hanafis and most Twelver Shi'is;<ref name=EI2/> the majority of the Malikis;<ref name=peters/> Malik, Abu Hanifa, and al-Awza'i;<ref name=EoF-taslib/> or Malikis, Hanafis, and Shafi'is.<ref name=EoF-hiraba/>
* Crucifying the culprit alive and sparing his life if he survives for three days, ascribed to Shiites.<ref name=peters/>

Most scholars limit the period of crucifixion to three days.<ref name=EI2/>

==In current legal systems==
===Iran===
In Iran, hiraba is known as '''moharebeh''' and is translated variously in English-language media as "waging war against God,"<ref name="auto"/> "war against God and the state,"<ref name="auto1"/> or "enmity against God."<ref name="amnesty"/><ref name="auto2"/> The charge is levied against people who commit acts against the government. Another related crime is Mofsede-fel-arz, which is "spreading corruption on the earth", which can be applied for political crimes such as treason. The Iran's judiciary system has also used another related crime, '''Baghy''', which is translated to "armed rebellion against the Islamic government",<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Rahiminejad |first=Esma’il |last2=Safarkhani |first2=Mohaddetheh |date=2014-05-01 |title=Study of Baghy in Imami Jurisprudence and Iranian Law |url=http://hoquq.iict.ac.ir/article_13665.html |journal=Islamic Law |volume=11 |issue=40 |pages=105–133 |issn=1735-3270}}</ref> especially against protesters during the 2022 Mahsa Amini protests.<ref>{{Cite web |title=۱۱ نماینده آلمانی کفالت سیاسی معترضان پرونده «خانه اصفهان» را بر عهده گرفتند |url=https://www.iranintl.com/202212304694 |access-date=2022-12-31 |website=ایران اینترنشنال |language=fa}}</ref>

In 2022, dozens have been charged with moharabeh for their involvement in the Mahsa Amini protests and at least four people have been executed.<ref>{{Cite news |date=2022-12-08 |title=Mohsen Shekari: Iran carries out first execution over protests |language=en-GB |work=BBC News |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-63900099 |access-date=2023-01-14}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Hafezi |first=Parisa |date=2022-12-12 |title=Iran carries out second execution linked to wave of popular protests |language=en |work=Reuters |url=https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/iran-carries-out-second-execution-linked-anti-government-protests-2022-12-12/ |access-date=2023-01-14}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Fassihi |first=Farnaz |date=2023-01-07 |title=Iran Executes 2 Men Arrested in Protests |language=en-US |work=The New York Times |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2023/01/07/world/middleeast/iran-executes-protesters.html |access-date=2023-01-14 |issn=0362-4331}}</ref> Human rights organizations have condemned the use of "sham trials designed to intimidate protestors" and the "chilling use of the death penalty in rush trials."<ref>{{Cite web |date=2022-11-16 |title=Iran: Chilling use of the death penalty to further brutally quell popular uprising |url=https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2022/11/iran-chilling-use-of-the-death-penalty-to-further-brutally-quell-popular-uprising/ |access-date=2023-01-14 |website=Amnesty International |language=en}}</ref> 

The term is widely used by Iran's Islamic Judiciary, citing [[Religion:Sharia|Sharia]] law, and is "usually used against those who take up arms against the state,"<ref name="amnesty"/> and usually carries the death penalty. The term is used in articles 183 to 196 of Iran's criminal law. The cases that fall under this term typically require involvement in armed criminal activities, e.g: taking up arms for terrorism and disruption of public safety (article 183), membership in groups conducting armed uprising (article 186), supporting groups planning to overthrow the government by force using weapons and explosives (article 187), accepting critical posts a Coup d'etat government. Articles 190-191 state that judge can give a person convicted under one of these crimes [[Social:Capital punishment|capital punishment]]. Peaceful and unarmed opposition to government does not fall under this term. Typical convicts under the term are members of armed ethnic separatist groups, members of armed drug trafficking groups, and people involved in armed robbery.<ref name="Iranian Criminal Law">{{Cite web|url=http://www.shora-gc.ir/Portal/File/ShowFile.aspx?ID=7d91954e-356c-42fd-842e-94d165c16f66|title=Iranian Criminal Law (Persian)}}</ref>

According to Human Rights Watch, "at least nine people" convicted of moharebeh by Islamic Revolutionary Courts for "their alleged ties to armed opposition groups" were executed in 2014.<ref name=hrw-2014>{{cite book|title=World Report 2015: Iran|url=https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2015/country-chapters/iran|website=Human Rights Watch|date=11 January 2015 |access-date=9 November 2015}}</ref>

Between the end of early days of the 1979 Islamic Revolution, when scores of former officials of the Shah and  others were arrested and executed for moharebeh,<ref>More commonly theses offenders were sentenced to death for committing a related violation of Islamic law, mofsed-e-filarz, or "spreading corruption on earth".</ref> and the beginning of the 2009 election protests, executions for moharebeh were rare, and usually applied against members of armed opposition/terrorist groups, Kurdish separatists, or common criminals.<ref name="murphy"/>

In recent years, Iranians executed after being charged with Moharebeh include Majidreza Rahnavard (2022), Mohsen Shekari (2022), Mohammad-Reza Ali-Zamani (2010), Arash Rahmanipour (2010), and Ehsan Fatahian (2009). Others accused, charged or convicted of Moharebeh include Adnan Hassanpour, whose death sentence for Moharebeh was overturned in 2008 on appeal, and Zeynab Jalalian, whose death sentence was commuted to life in prison. Shia cleric Hossein Kazemeyni Boroujerdi, known for preaching that religion is separate from politics, was reportedly charged with Moharebeh in 2007 by Iran's Special Court for the Clergy,<ref name="amnesty.org">[https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/mde13/103/2007/en/ Arbitrary arrest/ fear for safety/possible prisoners of conscience/medical concern/torture and ill-treatment], amnesty.org, 10 August 2007</ref> but had his sentence reduced to 11 years in prison after an appeal.

Student demonstrator Mohammad Amin Valian was sentenced to death for Moharebeh in 2009, a sentence overturned by an appeals court in March 2010.<ref>[http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2011239074_apmliran.html Iran court upholds death for opposition activist] By ALI AKBAR DAREINI (AP) 3 March 2010, accessed 4 March 2011</ref>  In March 2010, the 76-year-old former dean of Tehran University, Mohammad Maleki,  was charged with it for alleged "contact with unspecified foreign groups and working to undermine the Islamic system."<ref name="murphy"/> He was later convicted of lesser charges. Abdolreza Ghanbari, a university lecturer living in Pakdasht, was arrested in the wake of 2009 Ashura protests and convicted in 2010 of “Moharebeh through ties with hostile groups [against] the regime”. A request for pardon of the death sentence was rejected on 28 February 2012.<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.labourstart.org/cgi-bin/solidarityforever/show_campaign.cgi?c=1299 |archive-url=https://archive.today/20120914101301/http://www.labourstart.org/cgi-bin/solidarityforever/show_campaign.cgi?c=1299 |url-status=dead |archive-date=2012-09-14 |title=Iran: Stop the execution of Abdolreza Ghanbari |publisher=labourstart.org |year=2012 }}</ref>

In a February 2011 televised address before a group of clerics in the city of [[Place:Qom|Qom]], hard-liner cleric Ahmad Khatami accused reformist presidential candidates Mir Hossein Mousavi and Mahdi Karroubi of Moharebeh as "leaders of sedition."<ref>[http://www.staradvertiser.com/news/breaking/116307329.html?id=116307329 Iran opposition leader ready to 'pay any price'], by ALI AKBAR DAREINI, AP, 16 February 2011, accessed 4 March 2011</ref> This was not followed up with any charges against the two by the Iranian judiciary.

Abdolfattah Soltani, an Iranian attorney and member of Center for Defense of Human Rights has argued that under Articles 86 and 89 of the Islamic Punitive Laws of the Islamic Republic of Iran, the accused must "either have engaged in armed confrontation or he must have been a supporter or a member of an armed group and must have committed effective [deliberate] actions on behalf of that organization.", conditions that have not been met by defendants such as Valian, who threw stones at militia members.<ref>[http://www.iranhumanrights.org/2010/02/abdolfattah-soltani-according-to-law-and-sharia-throwing-stones-or-breaking-windows-do-not-constitute-moharebeh/ Abdolfattah Soltani: “According to law and Sharia, throwing stones or breaking windows do not constitute ‘moharebeh’”]| ICHRI| 9 February 2010</ref>

According to journalist (Brian Murphy), the Iranian Islamic regime's use of moharebeh against 2009 election protesters has "opened deep rifts between ruling clerics and Islamic scholars questioning how an idea about safeguarding Muslims can be transformed into a tool to punish political protesters."  Ayatollah Mostafa Mohaghegh Damad has reportedly sought to "rally clerics to oppose the use of moharebeh charges against political protesters."<ref name="murphy"/>

In 2019, an Iranian Quran interpreter has called for the punishment of those protesting, based on Quran Surah 5:33.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.memri.org/reports/iranian-quran-expert-bahrampur-national-tv-protesters-should-be-slaughtered-or-have-their  |title=Iranian Quran Expert Bahrampur On National TV: Protesters Should Be Slaughtered Or Have Their Feet And Hands Chopped Off On Alternate Sides; If We Kill 10,000 Of Them, It Will Not Be An Exaggeration |author=Bahrampur, Abolfazl|date=2 December 2019|work=MEMRI|access-date=26 December 2019}}</ref>

In December 2022, Iranian soccer player Amir Nasr-Azadani faces possible execution, according to reports; world footballers union expresses 'shock' and 'sadness'. Nasr-Azadani was accused of being a member of an "armed group" involved in the killing of three security officers during protests in the central Iranian city of Esfahan, the city's Chief Justice Asadullah Jafari said, as reported by the state agency IRNA this Sunday.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Fatima |first=Sakina |date=2022-12-14 |title=Iran's footballer Amir Nasr-Azadani to face execution over anti-hijab protests: Report |url=https://www.siasat.com/irans-footballer-amir-nasr-azadani-to-face-execution-over-anti-hijab-protests-report-2479404/ |access-date=2022-12-15 |website=The Siasat Daily |language=en-US}}</ref>

In the report, Jafari said Nasr-Azadani had been charged with Baghi, or rioting against the authorities, and has been in custody since November 27, but no sentence has yet been issued.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2022-12-14 |title=Who is Amir Nasr-Azadani, the Iranian footballer facing execution over hijab protests? |url=https://indianexpress.com/article/explained/explained-global/who-is-amir-nasr-azadani-8324860/ |access-date=2022-12-15 |website=The Indian Express |language=en}}</ref>

By late 2022, at least 43 Iranians had been sentenced to death for moharebeh or mofsed-e-filarz due to their purported involvement in the Mahsa Amini protests.<ref name=":2">{{Cite web |last=Mahmood |first=Zahid |last2=Alkhaldi |first2=Celine |last3=Elbagir |first3=Nima |date=2022-12-23 |title=Exclusive: Iranian footballer is among dozens facing execution while the West is distracted by Christmas, supporters fear |url=https://www.cnn.com/2022/12/23/middleeast/iran-footballer-amir-nasr-azadani-execution-intl/index.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230110032533/https://www.cnn.com/2022/12/23/middleeast/iran-footballer-amir-nasr-azadani-execution-intl/index.html |archive-date=2023-01-08 |access-date=2023-01-10 |website=CNN |language=en}}</ref> The first of their executions occurred on 8 December, when Mohsen Shekari was hanged after being convicted of moharebeh due to allegations that he nonfatally injured a Basij militiaman.<ref name=":62">{{Cite web |date=8 December 2022 |title=Iran Starts Executing Protesters With First Hanging |url=https://www.iranintl.com/en/202212088960 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221208123122/https://www.iranintl.com/en/202212088960 |archive-date=8 December 2022 |access-date=2022-12-08 |website=Iran International |language=en}}</ref> Four days later, Majidreza Rahnavard was publicly executed after being convicted of moharebeh due to allegations that he was involved in two murders of two "volunteer" Basij militiamen during a protest.<ref>{{Cite news |date=12 December 2022 |title=Majidreza Rahnavard: Iran carries out second execution over protests |language=en-GB |work=BBC News |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-63939428 |url-status=live |access-date=2022-12-12 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221213002741/https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-63939428 |archive-date=2022-12-12}}</ref> On 7 January 2023, Iran executed Mohammad Mehdi Karami and Seyyed Mohammad Hosseini after they were convicted of mofsed-e-filarz, in connection to their alleged involvement in the protests.<ref name=":2" /><ref name=":5">{{Cite news |last=Fassihi |first=Farnaz |date=2023-01-07 |title=Iran Executes 2 Men Arrested in Protests |language=en-US |work=The New York Times |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2023/01/07/world/middleeast/iran-executes-protesters.html |url-status=live |access-date=2023-01-10 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230110035435/https://www.nytimes.com/2023/01/07/world/middleeast/iran-executes-protesters.html |archive-date=2023-01-09 |issn=0362-4331}}</ref> Amnesty International accused Iran of extracting [[False confession|false confessions]] from those condemned to death for moharebeh or mofsed-e-filarz in connection with the protests, subjecting them to [[Philosophy:Torture|torture]], and depriving them of their right to a fair trial.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2 December 2022 |title=Urgent Action: 28 PEOPLE RISK EXECUTION IN RELATION TO UPRISING (Iran: UA 103.22) |url=https://www.amnestyusa.org/urgent-actions/urgent-action-28-people-risk-execution-in-relation-to-uprising-iran-ua-103-22/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221212081900/https://www.amnestyusa.org/urgent-actions/urgent-action-28-people-risk-execution-in-relation-to-uprising-iran-ua-103-22/ |archive-date=2022-12-12 |access-date=2022-12-12 |website=Amnesty International USA |language=en-US}}</ref><ref name=":33">{{Cite web |date=12 August 2022 |title=Iran executes first known prisoner arrested in protests |url=https://www.middle-east-online.com/en/iran-executes-first-known-prisoner-arrested-protests |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221208122413/https://www.middle-east-online.com/en/iran-executes-first-known-prisoner-arrested-protests |archive-date=8 December 2022 |access-date=2022-12-08 |website=Middle East Online |language=en}}</ref><ref name=":6">{{Cite web |date=8 December 2022 |title=Iran Starts Executing Protesters With First Hanging |url=https://www.iranintl.com/en/202212088960 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221208123122/https://www.iranintl.com/en/202212088960 |archive-date=8 December 2022 |access-date=2022-12-08 |website=Iran International |language=en}}</ref>

===Nigeria===
The penalty for hirabah in Nigeria is death if a life is taken during the offense. Additionally, the Zamfara penal code (in effect in the North of Nigeria) provides that if life and property are taken during the commission of hirabah, the penalty is crucifixion.{{sfnp|PEIFFER|2005|page=532}}<ref>Ruud PETERS, ''ISLAMIC CRIMINAL LAW IN NIGERIA'' 4 (2003), supra note 33, at 24. T</ref>

===Saudi Arabia===
In Saudi Arabia, Hirabah is defined as "Armed Robbery". To prove hirabah, two witnesses must testify or there must be a confession. In addition, an offender can still escape the death penalty if he "repents before he is arrested and willingly places himself in the hands of the authorities."{{sfnp|PEIFFER|2005|page=509}}<ref>Safia Safwat, ''Offences and Penalties in Islamic Law'', 26 ISLAMIC Q., 1982, p.296</ref>

==See also==
* [[Religion:Fasad|Fasad]]
* [[Religion:Jihad|Jihad]]
* Judicial system of Iran
* Mofsed-e-filarz
* Muslim attitudes towards terrorism

==References==
{{reflist}}
;Sources
* {{cite book|last1=Amin|first1=ElSayed|title=Reclaiming Jihad: A Qur'anic Critique of Terrorism|date=2014 |publisher=Kube Publishing|isbn=9780860375982|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=CTUrBgAAQBAJ |access-date=9 November 2015}}
* {{cite book|last1=Kadri|first1=Sadakat|title=Heaven on Earth: A Journey Through Shari'a Law from the Deserts of Ancient Arabia ...|date=2012|publisher=Macmillan|isbn=9780099523277 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ztCRZOhJ10wC&q=Exposure+from+a+cross+is+a+punishment+that+the+Qur%27an+authorizes+for}}
* {{cite journal|last1=PEIFFER|first1=ELIZABETH|title=THE DEATH PENALTY IN TRADITIONAL ISLAMIC LAW AND AS INTERPRETED IN SAUDI ARABIA AND NIGERIA|journal=William & Mary Journal of Women and the Law|date=2005 |volume=11 |issue=3 |pages=507–539 |url=http://scholarship.law.wm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1132&context=wmjowl|access-date=9 November 2015}}

== Further reading ==
*[https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=6392989 "The War on the Word 'Jihad'", by Guy Raz]
*[http://www.theislamproject.org/education/D05_Hirabah.htm "Making Sense of Jihad vs. Hirabah (Terrorism)", by the Islam Project]
*[http://theamericanmuslim.org/tam.php/features/articles/terrorism_hirabah_versus_jihad_rescuing_jihad_from_the_al_qaeda_blasphemy "Hirabah versus Jihad: Rescuing Jihad from The al Qaeda Blasphemy", by Jim Guirard]

[[Category:Islamic terminology]]

{{Sourceattribution|Hirabah|1}}