View source for Social:Received Pronunciation

{{Short description|Standard accent for British English}}
{{IPA notice}}

'''Received Pronunciation''' ('''RP''') is the [[Social:Accent (sociolinguistics)|accent]] traditionally regarded as the [[Social:Standard language|standard]] and most [[Social:Prestige (sociolinguistics)|prestigious]] form of spoken British English.{{sfnp|Wells|2008|p=xix, paragraph 2.1}}<ref name=":0" /> For over a century, there has been argument over such questions as the definition of RP, whether it is geographically neutral, how many speakers there are, whether sub-varieties exist, how appropriate a choice it is as a standard, and how the accent has changed over time.{{sfnp|Cruttenden|2014|pp=74–81}} The name itself is controversial. RP is an accent, so the study of RP is concerned only with matters of pronunciation, while other areas relevant to the study of language standards, such as vocabulary, [[Social:Grammar|grammar]], and [[Social:Style (sociolinguistics)|style]], are not considered.

==History==
The introduction of the term ''Received Pronunciation'' is usually credited to the British phonetician Daniel Jones. In the first edition of the ''English Pronouncing Dictionary'' (1917), he named the accent "Public School Pronunciation"; for the second edition in 1926 he wrote: "In what follows I call it Received Pronunciation, for want of a better term."{{sfnp|Jones|1926|p=ix}} However, the term had been used much earlier by P. S. Du Ponceau in 1818{{sfnp|DuPonceau|1818|p=259}} and the Oxford English Dictionary cites quotations back to about 1710.<ref>{{cite web |title=Oxford English Dictionary |url=https://www.oed.com/view/Entry/272029|website=Oxford English Dictionary (subscription required)|publisher=Oxford University Press |access-date=31 August 2022}}</ref> A similar term, ''received standard,'' was coined by Henry C. K. Wyld in 1927.{{sfnp|Wyld|1927|p=23}} The early phonetician Alexander John Ellis used both terms interchangeably, but with a much broader definition than Jones's, saying, "There is no such thing as a uniform educated pron. of English, and rp. and rs. is a variable quantity differing from individual to individual, although all its varieties are 'received', understood and mainly unnoticed".{{sfnp|Ellis|1869|p=3}}

Although a form of [[Social:Standard English|Standard English]] had been established in the [[Finance:City of London|City of London]] by the end of the 15th century, it did not begin to resemble RP until the late 19th century.{{sfnp|Crystal|2003|pp=54–5}}{{sfnp|Crystal|2005|pp=243–4}} RP has most in common with the dialects of what has been termed the South East Midlands, in particular the Golden Triangle of universities, namely London, Oxford and Cambridge, and the public schools that fed them, such as [[Organization:Eton College|Eton]], Harrow and Rugby.<ref name='Robinson'>{{cite web |last1=Robinson |first1=Jonnie |title=Received Pronunciation |url=https://www.bl.uk/british-accents-and-dialects/articles/received-pronunciation |website=British Library |access-date=22 November 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190829130006/https://www.bl.uk/british-accents-and-dialects/articles/received-pronunciation |archive-date=29 August 2019}}</ref> In 1922, the BBC selected RP as its broadcasting standard, citing its being widely understood globally as a reason.<ref name='Robinson' />

According to ''Fowler's Modern English Usage'' (1965), "the correct term is 'the Received Pronunciation'. The word 'received' conveys its original meaning of 'accepted' or 'approved', as in 'received wisdom'."<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.bl.uk/learning/langlit/sounds/find-out-more/received-pronunciation/ |publisher=British Library|title=Regional Voices – Received Pronunciation}}</ref>

===Alternative names===
 
Some linguists have used the term "RP" while expressing reservations about its suitability.{{sfnp|Cruttenden|2008|pp=77–80}}{{sfnp|Jenkins|2000|pp=13–6}}{{sfnp|Wells|1982|p=117}} The Cambridge-published ''English Pronouncing Dictionary'' (aimed at those learning English as a foreign language) uses the phrase "BBC Pronunciation", on the basis that the name "Received Pronunciation" is "archaic" and that BBC News presenters no longer suggest high social class and privilege to their listeners.{{sfnp|Jones|2011|p=vi}} Other writers have also used the name "BBC Pronunciation".{{sfnp|Ladefoged|2004}}{{sfnp|Trudgill|1999}} The term 'The Queen's English' has also been used by some writers.<ref name='Robinson'/>

The phonetician Jack Windsor Lewis frequently criticised the name "Received Pronunciation" in his blog: he has called it "invidious",<ref>{{cite web |author=Jack Windsor Lewis |url= http://www.yek.me.uk/reviewepd.html |title= Review of the Daniel Jones English Pronouncing Dictionary 15th edition 1997 |website= Yek.me.uk |access-date=24 August 2011}}</ref> a "ridiculously archaic, parochial and question-begging term"<ref>{{cite web |author=Jack Windsor Lewis |url= http://www.yek.me.uk/reviewlpd.html |title= Ovvissly not one of us – Review of the Longman Pronunciation Dictionary |website=Yek.me.uk |access-date= 24 August 2011}}</ref> and noted that American scholars find the term "quite curious".<ref name=jwl>{{cite web |author= Jack Windsor Lewis |url=http://www.yek.me.uk/brndaccents.html |title=British non-dialectal accents |website=Yek.me.uk |date=19 February 1972 |access-date=24 August 2011}}</ref> He used the term "General British" (to parallel "[[Social:General American|General American]]") in his 1970s publication of ''A Concise Pronouncing Dictionary of American and British English''<ref>{{cite book |last1=Windsor Lewis |first1=Jack |title=A Concise Pronouncing Dictionary of British and American English |date=1972 |publisher=Oxford |isbn=0-19-431123-6}}</ref> and in subsequent publications.<ref>{{cite web |author= Jack Windsor Lewis |url=http://www.yek.me.uk/cpdrevieweltj.html |title=Review of CPD in ELTJ |website= Yek.me.uk |access-date=24 August 2011}}</ref> The name "General British" is adopted in the latest revision of Gimson's ''Pronunciation of English''.{{sfnp|Cruttenden|2014|pp=80–2}} Beverley Collins and Inger Mees use the term "Non-Regional Pronunciation" for what is often otherwise called RP, and reserve the term "Received Pronunciation" for the "upper-class speech of the twentieth century".{{sfnp|Collins|Mees|2003|pp=3–4}} Received Pronunciation has sometimes been called "Oxford English", as it used to be the accent of most members of the [[Organization:University of Oxford|University of Oxford]].<ref name='Robinson'/> The ''Handbook of the International Phonetic Association'' uses the name "Standard Southern British". Page 4 reads:

{{Blockquote|text=Standard Southern British (where 'Standard' should not be taken as implying a value judgment of 'correctness') is the modern equivalent of what has been called 'Received Pronunciation' ('RP'). It is an accent of the south east of England which operates as a prestige norm there and (to varying degrees) in other parts of the British Isles and beyond.{{sfnp|International Phonetic Association|1999|p=4}}
}}

In her book ''Kipling's English History'' (1974) Marghanita Laski refers to this accent as "gentry". "What the Producer and I tried to do was to have each poem spoken in the dialect that was, so far as we could tell, ringing in Kipling's ears when he wrote it. Sometimes the dialect is most appropriately, Gentry. More often, it isn't."<ref>Laski, M., comp. (1974) ''Kipling's English History''. London: BBC; pp. 7, 12 &c.</ref>

===Sub-varieties===
Faced with the difficulty of defining a single standard of RP, some researchers have tried to distinguish between sub-varieties:

* {{harvtxt|Gimson|1980}} proposed Conservative, General, and Advanced; "Conservative RP" referred to a traditional accent associated with older speakers with certain social backgrounds; General RP was considered neutral regarding age, occupation or lifestyle of the speaker; and Advanced RP referred to speech of a younger generation of speakers.{{sfnp|Schmitt|2007|p=323}} Later editions (e.g., Gimson 2008) use the terms General, Refined and Regional RP. In the latest revision of Gimson's book, the terms preferred are General British (GB), Conspicuous GB and Regional GB.{{sfnp|Cruttenden|2014|pp=80–2}}
* {{harvtxt|Wells|1982}} refers to "mainstream RP" and "[[Social:U and non-U English|U-RP]]"; he suggests that Gimson's categories of Conservative and Advanced RP referred to the U-RP of the old and young respectively. However, Wells stated, "It is difficult to separate stereotype from reality" with U-RP.{{sfnp|Wells|1982|p=}} Writing on his blog in February 2013, Wells wrote, "If only a very small percentage of English people speak RP, as Trudgill et al. claim, then the percentage speaking U-RP is vanishingly small" and "If I were redoing it today, I think I'd drop all mention of 'U-RP'".<ref>[http://phonetic-blog.blogspot.co.uk/2013/02/exotic-spices.html exotic spices], John Wells's phonetic blog, 28 February 2013</ref>
* Upton distinguishes between RP (which he equates with Wells's "mainstream RP"), Traditional RP (after Ramsaran 1990), and an even older version which he identifies with Cruttenden's "Refined RP".<ref>{{cite book |last= Kortmann |first=Bernd |date= 2004 |pages= 217–230 |isbn= 978-3110175325 |publisher= Mouton de Gruyter |title= Handbook of Varieties of English: Phonology; Morphology, Syntax |url= http://www.textbooks.com/Handbook-of-Varieties-of-English-Phonology-Morphology-Syntax/9783110175325/Bernd-Kortmann.php?CSID=AU3SS3ZKD3DATAOMCOKTADSAB&dHTxt=978-3110175325&TYP=SBJ&CSID=AU3SSSCJWAKTCKUDKDQMQKS2B&PART=PRINT&TXT= |access-date= 29 March 2017}}</ref>
* An article on the website of the British Library refers to Conservative, Mainstream and Contemporary RP.<ref>
{{cite web
|author= British Library|title= Sounds Familiar
|url= http://www.bl.uk/learning/langlit/sounds/case-studies/received-pronunciation
|access-date= 29 March 2017
}}
</ref>

==Prevalence and perceptions==
Traditionally, Received Pronunciation has been associated with high social class. It was the "everyday speech in the families of Southern English persons whose men-folk [had] been educated at the great public boarding-schools"{{sfnp|Jones|1917|p=viii}} and which conveyed no information about that speaker's region of origin before attending the school. An 1891 teacher's handbook stated, "It is the business of educated people to speak so that no-one may be able to tell in what county their childhood was passed".<ref>{{cite book |last1=Burrell |first1=A. |title=Recitation: a Handbook for Teachers in Public Elementary School |date=1891 |location=London}}</ref> Nevertheless, in the 19th century some British prime ministers, such as William Ewart Gladstone, still spoke with some regional features.<ref>Gladstone's speech was the subject of a book ''[https://books.google.com/books?id=o5uvJAAACAAJ&dq The Best English. A claim for the superiority of Received Standard English], together with notes on Mr. Gladstone's pronunciation'', H.C. Kennedy, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1934.</ref>

Opinions differ over the proportion of Britons who speak RP. Trudgill estimated 3% in 1974,<ref name="trudgillestimate">{{cite web |last=Trudgill |first=Peter |title=Sociolinguistics of Modern RP |publisher=University College London |date=8 December 2000 |url=http://www.phon.ucl.ac.uk/home/estuary/trudgill.htm |access-date=3 October 2012}}</ref> but that rough estimate has been questioned by J. Windsor Lewis.<ref>{{cite web |last=Windsor Lewis|first=Jack |title=A Notorious Estimate |url=http://www.yek.me.uk/archive45.html#blog443 |website=JWL's Blogs |access-date=17 January 2017}}</ref> Upton notes higher estimates of 5% (Romaine, 2000) and 10% (Wells, 1982) but refers to these as "guesstimates" not based on robust research.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Upton| first=Clive |editor-last1=Reed|editor-first1=Marnie |editor-last2=Levis|editor-first2=John |title=The Handbook of English Pronunciation |publisher=John Wiley & Son|date=2019-01-21 |page=251 |chapter=Chapter 14: British English |isbn=978-1119055266}}</ref>

The claim that RP is non-regional is disputed, since it is most commonly found in London and the southeast of England. It is defined in the Concise Oxford English Dictionary as "the standard accent of English as spoken in the South of England",{{sfnp|Pearsall|1999|p=xiv}} and alternative names such as "Standard Southern British" have been used.{{sfnp|International Phonetic Association|1999}}
Despite RP's historic high social prestige in Britain,{{sfnp|Hudson|1981|p=337}} being seen as the accent of those with power, money, and influence, it may be perceived negatively by some as being associated with undeserved, or accidental, privilege<ref>{{cite web|last=Crystal|first=David|title=Language and Time|url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/voices/yourvoice/feature2_4.shtml|work=BBC voices|publisher=BBC |access-date=18 April 2011|date=March 2007}}</ref>{{sfnp|McArthur|2002|p=43}} and as a symbol of the southeast's political power in Britain.{{sfnp|McArthur|2002|p=43}} Based on a 1997 survey, Jane Stuart-Smith wrote, "RP has little status in Glasgow, and is regarded with hostility in some quarters".<ref>{{cite book|last=Stuart-Smith|first=Jane|title=Urban Voices|chapter=Glasgow: accent and voice quality|page=204|editor-last1=Foulkes|editor-first1=Paul|editor-last2=Docherty|editor-first2=Gerard|year=1999|isbn=0340706082|publisher=Arnold}}</ref> A 2007 survey found that residents of Scotland and Northern Ireland tend to dislike RP.<ref>{{cite news |title=Scottish and Irish accents top list of favourites |url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/this-britain/scottish-and-irish-accents-top-list-of-favourites-448630.html |work=The Independent |date=13 May 2007}}</ref> It is shunned by some with left-wing political views, who may be proud of having accents more typical of the working classes.{{sfnp|McArthur|2002|p=49}} 

Since the Second World War, and increasingly since the 1960s, a wider acceptance of regional English varieties has taken hold in education and public life.{{sfnp|Fishman|1977|p=319}}{{sfnp|Cruttenden|2014|p=78}} Nonetheless, surveys from 1969 to 2022 consistently show that RP is perceived as the most prestigious accent of English in the United Kingdom. In 2022, 25% of British adults reported being mocked for their regional accent at work, and 46% in social situations.<ref name=":0">{{Cite web |date=2022-11-03 |title=Bias against working-class and regional accents has not gone away, report finds |url=https://www.theguardian.com/inequality/2022/nov/03/bias-against-working-class-and-regional-accents-has-not-gone-away-report-finds |access-date=2022-11-03 |website=The Guardian |language=en}}</ref>

==Use==
===Media===
In the early days of British broadcasting speakers of English origin almost universally used RP. The first director-general of the BBC, Lord Reith, encouraged the use of a 'BBC accent' because it was a "style or quality of English which would not be laughed at in any part of the country". He distinguished the BBC accent from the 'Oxford accent', to which he was "vehemently opposed".<ref>{{Citation |title=1967: John REITH explains the "BBC ACCENT" {{!}} Lord Reith Looks Back {{!}} BBC Archive |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QwBQLoa3E_Y |language=en |access-date=2022-10-07}}</ref> In 1926 the BBC established an Advisory Committee on Spoken English with distinguished experts, including Daniel Jones, to advise on the correct pronunciation and other aspects of broadcast language. The Committee proved unsuccessful and was dissolved after the Second World War.<ref> {{cite web| url = https://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198736738.001.0001/acprof-9780198736738| title = Schwyter, J.R. 'Dictating to the Mob: The History of the BBC Advisory Committee on Spoken English', 2016, Oxford University Press| year = 2016| doi = 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198736738.001.0001| last1 = Schwyter| first1 = Jürg R.| publisher = Oxford University Press| isbn = 978-0-19-873673-8}}</ref> 
While the BBC did advise its speakers on pronunciation, there was never a formalised official BBC pronunciation standard.<ref>Sangster, Catherine, 'The BBC, its Pronunciation Unit and 'BBC English' in Roach, P., Setter, J. and Esling, J. (eds) ''Daniel Jones' English Pronouncing Dictionary'', 4th Edition, Cambridge University Press, pp. xxviii-xxix</ref> A notable departure from the use of pure RP came with the Yorkshire-born newsreader Wilfred Pickles during the Second World War; his accent allowing listeners to more clearly distinguish BBC broadcasts from German propaganda, though Pickles had modified his accent to be closer to RP.<ref>Discussed in {{harvtxt|Mugglestone|2003|pp=277–8}}, but even then Pickles modified his speech towards RP when reading the news.</ref><ref>Zoe Thornton, ''The Pickles Experiment – a Yorkshire man reading the news'', Transactions of the Yorkshire Dialect Society 2012, pp. 4–19.</ref>
Since the Second World War RP has played a much smaller role in broadcast speech. RP remains the accent most often heard in the speech of announcers and newsreaders on BBC Radio 3 and Radio 4, and in some TV channels, but non-RP accents are now more widely encountered.<ref>
{{cite book |last1= Roach |first1= Peter |last2= Setter |first2= Jane |last3= Esling |first3= John |title= Daniel Jones' English Pronouncing Dictionary |date= 2011 |publisher= Cambridge |page= xii}}
</ref>

===Dictionaries===

Most English dictionaries published in Britain (including the Oxford English Dictionary) now give phonetically transcribed RP pronunciations for all words. Pronunciation dictionaries represent a special class of dictionary giving a wide range of possible pronunciations: British pronunciation dictionaries are all based on RP, though not necessarily using that name. Daniel Jones transcribed RP pronunciations of words and names in the English Pronouncing Dictionary. Cambridge University Press continues to publish this title, as of 1997 edited by Peter Roach. Two other pronunciation dictionaries are in common use: the ''Longman Pronunciation Dictionary'',{{sfnp|Wells|2008}} compiled by John C. Wells (using the name "Received Pronunciation"), and Clive Upton's ''Oxford Dictionary of Pronunciation for Current English'',{{sfnp|Upton|Kretzschmar|Konopka|2001}} (now republished as ''The Routledge Dictionary of Pronunciation for Current English'').<ref>{{cite book |last1=Upton |first1=Clive |last2=Kretzschmar |first2=William |title=The Routledge Dictionary of Pronunciation for Current English |date=2017 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=9781138125667}}</ref>

===Language teaching===
Pronunciation forms an essential component of language learning and teaching; a ''model accent'' is necessary for learners to aim at, and to act as a basis for description in textbooks and classroom materials. RP has been the traditional choice for teachers and learners of British English.<ref>{{cite web |url= http://www.bl.uk/learning/langlit/sounds/case-studies/received-pronunciation/ |title= Case Studies – Received Pronunciation |publisher= British Library |date= 13 March 2007 |access-date= 27 January 2019 | quote = As well as being a living accent, RP is also a theoretical linguistic concept. It is the accent on which phonemic transcriptions in dictionaries are based, and it is widely used (in competition with General American) for teaching English as a foreign language.}}</ref> However, the choice of pronunciation model is difficult, and the adoption of RP is in many ways problematic.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Brown |first1=Adam |title=Pronunciation Models |date=1991 |publisher=Singapore University Press |isbn=9971-69-157-4}}</ref>{{sfnp|Cruttenden|2014|pp=325–52}}

==Phonology==

===Consonants===
{| class="wikitable" style=text-align:center
|-style="font-size: 90%;"
|+Consonant phonemes{{sfnp|Roach|2004|pp=240–1}}
!
!colspan=2| Labial
!colspan=2| Dental
!colspan=2| Alveolar
!colspan=2| Post-<br/>alveolar
!colspan=2| Palatal
!colspan=2| Velar
!colspan=2| Glottal
|-
! <small>Nasal</small>
| width="20" style="border-right: 0;" | || width="20" style="border-left: 0;" |{{IPA link|m}}
|colspan=2|
| width="20" style="border-right: 0;" | || width="20" style="border-left: 0;" |{{IPA link|n}}
|colspan=2|
|colspan=2|
| width="20" style="border-right: 0;" | || width="20" style="border-left: 0;" |{{IPA link|ŋ}}
|colspan=2|
|-
! <small>Stop</small>
|style="border-right: 0;"|{{IPA link|p}}||style="border-left: 0;"|{{IPA link|b}}
|colspan=2|
|style="border-right: 0;"|{{IPA link|t}}||style="border-left: 0;"|{{IPA link|d}}
|colspan=2|
|colspan=2|
|style="border-right: 0;"|{{IPA link|k}}||style="border-left: 0;"|{{IPA link|ɡ}}
|colspan=2|
|-
! <small>Affricate</small>
|colspan=2|
|colspan=2|
|colspan=2|
| width="20" style="border-right: 0;" |{{IPA link|tʃ}}|| width="20" style="border-left: 0;" |{{IPA link|dʒ}}
|colspan=2|
|colspan=2|
|colspan=2|
|-
! <small>Fricative</small>
| width="20" style="border-right: 0;" |{{IPA link|f}}|| width="20" style="border-left: 0;" |{{IPA link|v}}
| width="20" style="border-right: 0;" |{{IPA link|θ}}|| width="20" style="border-left: 0;" |{{IPA link|ð}}
|style="border-right: 0;"|{{IPA link|s}}||style="border-left: 0;"|{{IPA link|z}}
|style="border-right: 0;"|{{IPA link|ʃ}}||style="border-left: 0;"|{{IPA link|ʒ}}
|colspan=2|
|colspan=2|
| width="20" style="border-right: 0;" |{{IPA link|h}}|| width="20" style="border-left: 0;" |
|-
!rowspan=1| <small>Approximant</small>
|colspan=2|
|colspan=2|
|style="border-right: 0;"| ||style="border-left: 0;"|{{IPA link|l}}
|style="border-right: 0;"| ||style="border-left: 0;"|{{IPA link|ɹ|r}}
| width="20" style="border-right: 0;" | || width="20" style="border-left: 0;" |{{IPA link|j}}
|style="border-right: 0;"| ||style="border-left: 0;"|{{IPA link|w}}
|colspan=2|
|-
|}

Nasals and liquids ({{IPA|/m/}}, {{IPA|/n/}}, {{IPA|/ŋ/}}, {{IPA|/r/}}, {{IPA|/l/}}) may be syllabic in unstressed syllables.{{sfnp|Roach|2004|p=241}} The consonant {{IPA|/r/}} in RP is generally a postalveolar approximant,{{sfnp|Roach|2004|p=241}} which would normally be expressed with the sign {{IPA|[ɹ]}} in the [[International Phonetic Alphabet]], but the sign {{IPA|/r/}} is nonetheless traditionally used for RP in most of the literature on the topic.

Voiceless plosives ({{IPA|/p/}}, {{IPA|/t/}}, {{IPA|/k/}}, {{IPA|/tʃ/}}) are aspirated at the beginning of a syllable, unless a completely unstressed vowel follows. (For example, the {{IPA|/p/}} is aspirated in "impasse", with primary stress on "-passe", but not "compass", where "-pass" has no stress.) Aspiration does not occur when {{IPA|/s/}} precedes in the same syllable, as in "spot" or "stop". When a sonorant {{IPA|/l/}}, {{IPA|/r/}}, {{IPA|/w/}}, or {{IPA|/j/}} follows, this aspiration is indicated by partial devoicing of the sonorant.{{sfnp|Roach|2004|p=240}} {{IPA|/r/}} is a fricative when devoiced.{{sfnp|Roach|2004|p=241}}

Syllable final {{IPA|/p/}}, {{IPA|/t/}}, {{IPA|/tʃ/}}, and {{IPA|/k/}} may be either preceded by a glottal stop (glottal reinforcement) or, in the case of {{IPA|/t/}}, fully replaced by a glottal stop, especially before a syllabic nasal (''bitten'' {{IPA|[ˈbɪʔn̩]}}).{{sfnp|Roach|2004|p=240}}{{sfnp|Gimson|1970}} The glottal stop may be realised as creaky voice; thus, an alternative phonetic transcription of ''attempt'' {{IPA|[əˈtʰemʔt]}} could be {{IPA|[əˈtʰemm̰t]}}.{{sfnp|Roach|2004|p=241}}

As in other varieties of English, voiced plosives ({{IPA|/b/}}, {{IPA|/d/}}, {{IPA|/ɡ/}}, {{IPA|/dʒ/}}) are partly or even fully devoiced at utterance boundaries or adjacent to voiceless consonants. The voicing distinction between voiced and voiceless sounds is reinforced by a number of other differences, with the result that the two of consonants can clearly be distinguished even in the presence of devoicing of voiced sounds:

#Aspiration of voiceless consonants syllable-initially.
#Glottal reinforcement of /p, t, k, tʃ/ syllable-finally.
#Shortening of vowels before voiceless consonants.

As a result, some authors prefer to use the terms "fortis" and "lenis"<ref>{{Cite journal|title=Fortis and lenis obstruents in English|first=Herbert F. W.|last=Stahlke|date=1 January 2003|journal=WORD|volume=54|issue=2|pages=191–216|doi=10.1080/00437956.2003.12068832|s2cid=141381109 |doi-access=free}}</ref> in place of "voiceless" and "voiced". However, the latter are traditional and in more frequent usage.

The voiced dental fricative ({{IPA|/ð/}}) is more often a weak dental plosive; the sequence {{IPA|/nð/}} is often realised as {{IPA|[n̪n̪]}} (a long dental nasal).{{sfnp|Lodge|2009|pp=148–9}}{{sfnp|Shockey|2003|pp=43–4}}{{sfnp|Roach|2009|p=112}} {{IPA|/l/}} has velarised allophone ({{IPA|[ɫ]}}) in the syllable rhyme.{{sfnp|Halle|Mohanan|1985|p=65}} {{IPA|/h/}} becomes voiced ({{IPA|[ɦ]}}) between voiced sounds.{{sfnp|Jones|1967|p=201}}{{sfnp|Cruttenden|2008|p=204}}

===Vowels===
[[Image:RP English monophthongs chart.svg|thumb|Monophthongs of a fairly conservative variety of RP. From {{harvtxt|Roach| 2004|p=242}}]]
[[Image:Modern General British monophthong chart.svg|thumb|Monophthongs of a modern variety of RP. Adapted from {{harvtxt|Cruttenden| 2014|}}]]
[[Image:Ranges of RP and GA English weak vowels.svg|thumb|Ranges of the weak vowels in RP and GA. From {{harvtxt|Wells| 2008|p=XXV}}]]
[[Image:RP English allophones on a vowel chart.svg|thumb|Allophones of some RP monophthongs, from {{Harvcoltxt|Collins|Mees|2003|pp=92, 95, 101}}. The red ones occur before dark {{IPA|/l/|cat=no}},<ref>{{Harvcoltxt|Collins|Mees|2003|pp=95, 101}}</ref> and the blue one occurs before velars.<ref>{{Harvcoltxt|Collins|Mees|2003|p=92}}</ref>]]

{|class="wikitable" style="text-align: center;"
|+ Monophthongs ("Short")
!
! Front
! Central
! Back
|-
! Close
| {{IPA link|ɪ}}
|
|{{IPA link|ɵ|ʊ}}
|-
! Mid
| {{IPA link|ɛ|e}}
| {{IPA link|ə}}
|
|-
!Open
| {{IPA link|a|æ}}
| {{IPA link|ɐ|ʌ}}
|{{IPA link|ɔ|ɒ}}
|}

Examples of short vowels: {{IPA|/ɪ/}} in ''k'''i'''t'', ''m'''i'''rror'' and ''rabb'''i'''t'', {{IPA|/ʊ/}} in ''f'''oo'''t'' and ''c'''oo'''k'', {{IPA|/e/}} in ''dr'''e'''ss'' and ''m'''e'''rry'', {{IPA|/ʌ/}} in ''str'''u'''t'' and ''c'''u'''rry'', {{IPA|/æ/}} in ''tr'''a'''p'' and ''m'''a'''rry'', {{IPA|/ɒ/}} in ''l'''o'''t'' and '''''o'''range'', {{IPA|/ə/}} in '''''a'''go'' and ''sof'''a'''''.

{|class="wikitable" style="text-align: center;"
|+ Monophthongs ("Long")
!
! Front
! Central
! Back
|-
! Close
| {{IPA link|iː|audio=en-uk-e.ogg}}
|
| {{IPA link|ʉ|uː}} 
|-
! Mid
| {{IPA link|ɛː|audio=en-uk-air.ogg}}
| {{IPA link|ɜː|audio=LL-Q1860 (eng)-Vealhurl-er.wav}}
|{{IPA link|o|ɔː|audio=en-uk-awe.ogg}}
|-
! Open
|
|
| {{IPA link|ɑː|audio=En-uk-r.ogg}}
|}

Examples of long vowels: {{IPA|/iː/}} in ''fl'''ee'''ce'', {{IPA|/uː/}} in ''g'''oo'''se'', {{IPA|/ɛː/}} in ''b'''ear''''', {{IPA|/ɜː/}} in ''n'''ur'''se'' and ''f'''ur'''ry'', {{IPA|/ɔː/}} in ''n'''or'''th'', ''f'''or'''ce'' and ''th'''ou'''ght'', {{IPA|/ɑː/}} in ''f'''a'''ther'' and ''st'''ar'''t''.

The long mid front vowel {{IPA|/ɛː/}} is elsewhere transcribed with the traditional symbols {{angbr IPA|ɛə, eə}}. The predominant realisation in contemporary RP is monophthongal.{{sfnp|Cruttenden|2014|p=118}}

===="Long" and "short" vowels====
Many conventional descriptions of the RP vowel system group the non-diphthongal vowels into the categories "long" and "short". This should not be taken to mean that RP has minimal pairs in which the only difference is vowel length. "Long" and "short" are convenient cover terms for a number of phonetic features. The long-short pairings shown above include also differences in vowel quality.

The vowels called "long" high vowels in RP {{IPA|/iː/}} and {{IPA|/uː/}} are slightly diphthongized, and are often narrowly transcribed in phonetic literature as diphthongs {{IPA|[ɪi]}} and {{IPA|[ʊu]}}.{{sfnp|Roach|2009|p=24}}

Vowels may be phonologically long or short (i.e. belong to the long or the short group of vowel phonemes) but their length is influenced by their context: in particular, they are shortened if a voiceless (fortis) consonant follows in the syllable, so that, for example, the vowel in 'bat' {{IPA|[bæʔt]}} is shorter than the vowel in 'bad' {{IPA|[bæd]}}. The process is known as ''pre-fortis clipping''. Thus phonologically short vowels in one context can be phonetically ''longer'' than phonologically long vowels in another context.{{sfnp|Roach|2004|p=241}} For example, the vowel called "long" {{IPA|/iː/}} in 'reach' {{IPA|/riːtʃ/}} (which ends with a voiceless consonant) may be ''shorter'' than the vowel called "short" {{IPA|/ɪ/}} in the word 'ridge' {{IPA|/rɪdʒ/}} (which ends with a voiced consonant). Wiik,{{sfnp|Wiik|1965}} cited in {{harvcol|Cruttenden|2014}}, published durations of English vowels with a mean value of 172 [[Millisecond|ms]] for short vowels before voiced consonants but a mean value of 165 ms for long vowels preceding voiceless consonants.{{sfnp|Cruttenden|2014|p=101}}

In natural speech, the plosives {{IPA|/t/}} and {{IPA|/d/}} often have no audible release utterance-finally, and voiced consonants are partly or completely devoiced (as in {{IPA|[b̥æd̥]}}); thus the perceptual distinction between pairs of words such as 'bad' and 'bat', or 'seed' and 'seat' rests mostly on vowel length (though the presence or absence of glottal reinforcement provides an additional cue).{{sfnp|Cruttenden|2014|p=}}

Unstressed vowels are both shorter and more centralised than stressed ones. In unstressed syllables occurring before vowels and in final position, contrasts between long and short high vowels are neutralised and short {{IPA|[i]}} and {{IPA|[u]}} occur (e.g. ''happy'' {{IPA|[ˈhæpi]}}, ''throughout'' {{IPA|[θɹuˈaʊʔt]}}).{{sfnp|Roach|2004|pp=241, 243}} The neutralisation is common throughout many English dialects, though the phonetic realisation of e.g. {{IPA|[i]}} rather than {{IPA|[ɪ]}} (a phenomenon called ''happy''-tensing) is not as universal.

Unstressed vowels vary in quality:
* {{IPA|/i/}} (as in {{sc2|HAPP{{underline|Y}}}}) ranges from close front {{IPAblink|i}} to close-mid retracted front {{IPAblink|e|e̠}};{{sfnp|Wells|2008|p=XXV}}
* {{IPA|/u/}} (as in {{sc2|INFL{{underline|U}}ENCE}}) ranges from close advanced back {{IPAblink|u|u̟}} to close-mid retracted central {{IPAblink|ɵ|ɵ̠}};{{sfnp|Wells|2008|p=XXV}} according to the phonetician Jane Setter, the typical pronunciation of this vowel is a weakly rounded, mid-centralized close back unrounded vowel, transcribed in the IPA as {{IPAblink|ʊ|u̜̽}} or simply {{IPAblink|ʊ|ʊ̜}};<ref>{{cite web|title=A World of Englishes: Is {{IPA|/ə/|cat=no}} "real"?|date=19 June 2013|url=http://aworldofenglishes.blogspot.com/2013/06/is-real.html|access-date=5 March 2016}}</ref>
* {{IPA|/ə/}} (as in {{sc2|COMM{{underline|A}}}}) ranges from close-mid central {{IPAblink|ɘ}} to open-mid central {{IPAblink|ɜ}}.{{sfnp|Wells|2008|p=XXV}}

====Diphthongs and triphthongs====
[[Image:RP English diphthongs chart.svg|thumb|Diphthongs of RP. From {{harvtxt|Roach|2004|p=242}}]]
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align: center;"
|-
! Diphthong
! colspan="2" |Example
|-
! colspan="3" | Closing
|-
| {{IPA|/eɪ/}} {{Audio|en-uk-a.ogg||help=no}} || {{IPA|/beɪ/}} || bay
|-
| {{IPA|/aɪ/}} {{Audio|en-uk-I.ogg||help=no}} || {{IPA|/baɪ/}} || buy
|-
| {{IPA|/ɔɪ/}} {{Audio|en-uk-oi.ogg||help=no}} || {{IPA|/bɔɪ/}} || boy
|-
| {{IPA|/əʊ/}} {{Audio|En-uk-oh.ogg||help=no}} || {{IPA|/bəʊ/}} || beau
|-
| {{IPA|/aʊ/}} || {{IPA|/baʊ/}} || bough
|-
! colspan="3" | Centring
|-
| {{IPA|/ɪə/}} {{Audio|en-uk-ear.ogg||help=no}} || {{IPA|/bɪə/}} || beer
|-
| {{IPA|/ʊə/}} || {{IPA|/bʊə/}} || boor
|}

The centring diphthongs are gradually being eliminated in RP. The vowel {{IPA|/ɔə/}} (as in ''door'', ''boar'') had largely merged with {{IPA|/ɔː/}} by the Second World War, and the vowel {{IPA|/ʊə/}} (as in ''poor'', ''tour'') has more recently merged with {{IPA|/ɔː/}} as well among most speakers,{{sfnp|Roca|Johnson|1999|p=200}} although the sound {{IPA|/ʊə/}} is still found in conservative speakers, and in less common words such as ''boor''. See {{sc2|CURE}}–{{sc2|FORCE}} merger. More recently {{IPA|/ɛə/}} has become a pure long vowel {{IPA|/ɛː/}}, as explained above. {{IPA|/ɪə/}} is increasingly pronounced as a monophthong {{IPA|[ɪː]}}, although without merging with any existing vowels.{{sfnp|Cruttenden|2014|p=154}}

The diphthong {{IPA|/əʊ/}} is pronounced by some RP speakers in a noticeably different way when it occurs before {{IPA|/l/}}, if that consonant is syllable-final and not followed by a vowel (the context in which {{IPA|/l/}} is pronounced as a "dark l"). The realization of {{IPA|/əʊ/}} in this case begins with a more back, rounded and sometimes more open vowel quality; it may be transcribed as {{IPA|[ɔʊ]}} or {{IPA|[ɒʊ]}}. It is likely that the backness of the diphthong onset is the result of allophonic variation caused by the raising of the back of the tongue for the {{IPA|/l/}}. If the speaker has "l-vocalization" the {{IPA|/l/}} is realized as a back rounded vowel, which again is likely to cause backing and rounding in a preceding vowel as coarticulation effects. This phenomenon has been discussed in several blogs by John C. Wells.<ref>{{cite web|last=Wells|first=John|title=Blog July 2006|url=http://www.phon.ucl.ac.uk/home/wells/blog0607.htm|access-date=24 March 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|last=Wells|first=John|title=Blog July 2009|url=http://www.phonetic-blog.blogspot.fr/2009_10_01_archive.html|access-date=24 March 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|last=Wells|first=John|title=Blog Nov 2009|url=http://www.phonetic-blog.blogspot.fr/2009_11_01_archive.html|access-date=24 March 2014}}</ref> In the recording included in this article the phrase "fold his cloak" contains examples of the {{IPA|/əʊ/}} diphthong in the two different contexts. The onset of the pre-{{IPA|/l/}} diphthong in "fold" is slightly more back and rounded than that in "cloak".

RP also possesses the triphthongs {{IPA|/aɪə/}} as in ''tire'', {{IPA|/aʊə/}} as in ''tower'', {{IPA|/əʊə/}} as in ''lower'', {{IPA|/eɪə/}} as in ''layer'' and {{IPA|/ɔɪə/}} as in ''loyal''. There are different possible realisations of these items: in slow, careful speech they may be pronounced as two syllables with three distinct vowel qualities in succession, or as a monosyllabic triphthong. In more casual speech the middle vowel may be considerably reduced, by a process known as smoothing, and in an extreme form of this process the triphthong may even be reduced to a single long vowel.{{sfnp|Roach|2009|pp=18–9}} In such a case the difference between {{IPA|/aʊə/}}, {{IPA|/aɪə/}}, and {{IPA|/ɑː/}} in ''tower'', ''tire'', and ''tar'' may be neutralised with all three units realised as {{IPA|[ɑː]}} or {{IPA|[äː]}}. This type of smoothing is known as the ''tower''–''tire'', ''tower''–''tar'' and ''tire''–''tar'' mergers.

{| class="wikitable" style="text-align: center;"
|+ Triphthongs{{sfnp|Gimson|1970}}
! As two syllables
! Triphthong
! Loss of mid-element
! Further simplified as
! Example
|-
| {{IPA|[aɪ.ə]}}
| {{IPA|[aɪə]}}
| {{IPA|[aːə]}}
| {{IPA|[aː]}}
| tire
|-
| {{IPA|[ɑʊ.ə]}}
| {{IPA|[ɑʊə]}}
| {{IPA|[ɑːə]}}
| {{IPA|[ɑː]}}
| tower
|-
| {{IPA|[əʊ.ə]}}
| {{IPA|[əʊə]}}
| {{IPA|[əːə]}}
| {{IPA|[ɜː]}}
| lower
|-
| {{IPA|[eɪ.ə]}}
| {{IPA|[eɪə]}}
| {{IPA|[ɛːə]}}
| {{IPA|[ɛː]}}
| layer
|-
| {{IPA|[ɔɪ.ə]}}
| {{IPA|[ɔɪə]}}
| {{IPA|[ɔːə]}}
| {{IPA|[ɔː]}}
| loyal
|}

====BATH vowel====
{{see also|Trap–bath split{{!}}''Trap–bath'' split}}
There are differing opinions as to whether {{IPA|/æ/}} in the <small>BATH</small> [[Social:Lexical set|lexical set]] can be considered RP. The pronunciations with {{IPA|/ɑː/}} are invariably accepted as RP.{{sfnp|Wells|1982|pp=203ff}} The ''English Pronouncing Dictionary'' does not admit {{IPA|/æ/}} in <small>BATH</small> words and the ''Longman Pronunciation Dictionary'' lists them with a § marker of non-RP status.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.yek.me.uk/lpdeltj.html |title=Review of Longman Pronunciation Dictionary |author=Jack Windsor Lewis |newspaper=The Times |year=1990}}</ref> John Wells wrote in a blog entry on 16 March 2012 that when growing up in the north of England he used {{IPA|/ɑː/}} in "bath" and "glass", and considers this the only acceptable phoneme in RP.<ref>{{cite web |last=Wells |first=John |url=http://www.phonetic-blog.blogspot.co.uk/2012/03/english-places.html |title=English places |website=John Wells's phonetic blog |date=16 March 2012}}</ref> Others have argued that {{IPA|/æ/}} is too categorical in the north of England to be excluded. Clive Upton believes that {{IPA|/æ/}} in these words must be considered within RP and has called the opposing view "south-centric".{{sfnp|Upton|2004|pp=222–3}} Upton's ''Oxford Dictionary of Pronunciation for Current English'' gives both variants for <small>BATH</small> words. A. F. Gupta's survey of mostly middle-class students found that {{IPA|/æ/}} was used by almost everyone who was from clearly north of the [[Social:Isogloss|isogloss]] for <small>BATH</small> words. She wrote, "There is no justification for the claims by Wells and Mugglestone that this is a sociolinguistic variable in the north, though it is a sociolinguistic variable on the areas on the border [the isogloss between north and south]".{{sfnp|Gupta|2005|p=25}} In a study of speech in West Yorkshire, K. M. Petyt wrote that "the amount of {{IPA|/ɑː/}} usage is too low to correlate meaningfully with the usual factors", having found only two speakers (both having attended boarding schools in the south) who consistently used {{IPA|/ɑː/}}.{{sfnp|Petyt|1985|pp=166–7}}

Jack Windsor Lewis has noted that the Oxford Dictionary's position has changed several times on whether to include short {{IPA|/æ/}} within its prescribed pronunciation.<ref>Point 18 in {{cite web |url=http://www.yek.me.uk/centnthpn.html |title=The General Central Northern Non-Dialectal Pronunciation of England |author=Jack Windsor Lewis |access-date=4 July 2011}}</ref> The ''BBC Pronouncing Dictionary of British Names'' uses only {{IPA|/ɑː/}}, but its author, Graham Pointon, has stated on his blog that he finds both variants to be acceptable in place names.<ref>{{cite web |last=Pointon |first=Graham |url=http://www.linguism.co.uk/language/olivia-oleary |title=Olivia O'Leary |website=Linguism: Language in a word |date=20 April 2010}}</ref>

Some research has concluded that many people in the North of England have a dislike of the {{IPA|/ɑː/}} vowel in <small>BATH</small> words. A. F. Gupta wrote, "Many of the northerners were noticeably hostile to {{IPA|/ɡrɑːs/}}, describing it as 'comical', 'snobbish', 'pompous' or even 'for morons'."{{sfnp|Gupta|2005|p=25}} On the subject, K. M. Petyt wrote that several respondents "positively said that they did not prefer the long-vowel form or that they really detested it or even that it was incorrect".{{sfnp|Petyt|1985|p=286}} Mark Newbrook has assigned this phenomenon the name "conscious rejection", and has cited the {{sc2|BATH}} vowel as "the main instance of conscious rejection of RP" in his research in West Wirral.{{sfnp|Newbrook|1999|p=101}}

====French words====
John Wells has argued that, as educated British speakers often attempt to pronounce French names in a French way, there is a case for including {{IPA|/ɒ̃/}} (as in {{lang|fr|bon}}), and {{IPA|/æ̃/}} and {{IPA|/ɜ̃:/}} (as in {{lang|fr|vingt-et-un}}), as marginal members of the RP vowel system.{{sfnp|Wells|2008|p=xxix}} He also argues against including other French vowels on the grounds that not many British speakers succeed in distinguishing the vowels in {{lang|fr|bon}} and {{lang|fr|banc}}, or in {{lang|fr|rue}} and {{lang|fr|roue}}.{{sfnp|Wells|2008|p=xxix}} However, the ''Cambridge English Pronouncing Dictionary'' draws a distinction between {{IPA|/ɒ̃/}} (there rendered as {{IPA|/ɔ̃ː/}}) and the unrounded {{IPA|/ɑ̃ː/}} of {{lang|fr|banc}} for a total of four nasal vowels.{{sfnp|Roach|2011}}

====Alternative notation====
Not all reference sources use the same system of transcription. Clive Upton devised a modified system for the ''Shorter Oxford English Dictionary'' (1993), changing five symbols from the traditional Gimson system, and this is now used in many other [[Organization:Oxford University Press|Oxford University Press]] dictionaries; the differences are shown in the table below.

{| cellspacing="5" style="margin-left:1.5em;" class="wikitable"
|+ Upton's reform
! style="text-align:left; width:33%;" | Example word
! style="text-align:left; width:33%;" | Traditional symbol
! style="text-align:left;" | Upton's reform symbol
|-
| ''dr'''e'''ss'' || {{IPA|/e/}} || {{IPA|/ɛ/}}
|-
| ''tr'''a'''p'' || {{IPA|/æ/}} || {{IPA|/a/}}
|-
| ''n'''ur'''se'' || {{IPA|/ɜː/}} || {{IPA|/əː/}}
|-
| ''squ'''are''''' || {{IPA|/eə/}} || {{IPA|/ɛː/}}
|-
| ''pr'''i'''ce'' || {{IPA|/aɪ/}} || {{IPA|/ʌɪ/}}
|}

Linguist Geoff Lindsey has argued that the system of transcription for RP has become outdated and has proposed a new system (which he calls Standard Southern British English, or SSB) as a replacement.<ref>{{cite web |last=Lindsey |first=Geoff |url=http://englishspeechservices.com/blog/?p=1795 |title=The British English vowel system |website=speech talk |date=8 March 2012}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last=Wells |first=John |url=http://phonetic-blog.blogspot.co.uk/2012/03/lindsey-system.html |title=the Lindsey system |website=John Wells's phonetic blog |date=12 March 2012}}</ref>

Lindsey's system is as follows—differences between it and standard transcription are depicted with the usual transcription in brackets.
{| class="wikitable"
|+Lindsey's Monophthongs and Diphthongs
!Short
!Long (triggering r-liaison)
!+j diphthong
!+w diphthong
|-
|{{IPA|/a/}} (æ)
|{{IPA|/ɑː/}}
|{{IPA|/ɑj/}} (aɪ)
|{{IPA|/aw/}} (aʊ)
|-
|{{IPA|/ɛ/}} (e)
|{{IPA|/ɛː/}}
|{{IPA|/ɛj/}} (eɪ)
|
|-
|{{IPA|/ɪ/}}
|{{IPA|/ɪː/}} (ɪə)
|{{IPA|/ɪj/}} (iː)
|
|-
|{{IPA|/ɔ/}} (ɒ)
|{{IPA|/oː/}} (ɔː)
|{{IPA|/oj/}} (ɔɪ)
|
|-
|{{IPA|/ɵ/}} (ʊ)
|{{IPA|/ɵː/}} (ʊə)
|
|{{IPA|/ʉw/}} (uː)
|-
|{{IPA|/ə/}}
|{{IPA|/əː/}} (ɜː)
|
|{{IPA|/əw/}} (əʊ)
|-
|{{IPA|/ʌ/}}
|
|
|
|}

==Historical variation==

Like all accents, RP has changed with time. For example, sound recordings and films from the first half of the 20th century demonstrate that it was usual for speakers of RP to pronounce the {{IPA|/æ/}} sound, as in ''land'', with a vowel close to {{IPA|[ɛ]}}, so that ''land'' would sound similar to a present-day pronunciation of ''lend''. RP is sometimes known as '''the Queen's English''', but recordings show that even Queen Elizabeth II shifted her pronunciation over the course of her reign, ceasing to use an {{IPA|[ɛ]}}-like vowel in words like ''land''.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/003859.html|title=Happy-tensing and coal in sex|author=Language Log|date=5 December 2006}}</ref> The change in RP may be observed in the home of "'''BBC English'''". The BBC accent of the 1950s is distinctly different from today's: a news report from the 1950s is recognisable as such, and a mock-1950s BBC voice is used for comic effect in programmes wishing to satirise 1950s social attitudes such as the Harry Enfield Show and its "Mr. Cholmondley-Warner" sketches.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Enfield |first1=Harry |title=Mr Cholmondley-Warner on Life in 1990 |website=[[Company:YouTube|YouTube]] |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gou1cspUfdY | archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/varchive/youtube/20211030/gou1cspUfdY| archive-date=2021-10-30|access-date=14 May 2020}}{{cbignore}}</ref>{{citation needed|date=September 2023}}
[[Image:RP vowel movement.png|thumb|350px|A comparison of the [[Physics:Formant|formant]] values of {{IPA|/iː æ ɑː ɔː ʊ uː/}} for older (black) and younger (light blue) RP speakers. From {{harvtxt|de Jong|McDougall|Hudson|Nolan|2007|p=1814}}]]

A few illustrative examples of changes in RP during the 20th century and early 21st are given below. A more comprehensive list (using the name 'General British' in place of 'RP') is given in ''Gimson's Pronunciation of English''.{{sfnp|Cruttenden|2014|pp=83–5}}

===Vowels and diphthongs===

* Words such as {{sc2|CLOTH}}, ''gone'', ''off'', ''often'', ''cross'' were pronounced with {{IPA|/ɔː/}} instead of {{IPA|/ɒ/}}, so that ''often'' and ''orphan'' were [[Philosophy:Homophone|homophone]]s (see ''lot''–''cloth'' split). The Queen continued to use the older pronunciations,<ref>[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0HnePKE9AAE&t=280s The Queen's speech to President Sarkozy], "often" pronounced at 4:40.</ref> but it is now rare to hear this on the BBC.
* There used to be a distinction between ''horse'' and ''hoarse'' with an extra diphthong {{IPA|/ɔə/}} appearing in words like ''hoarse'', {{sc2|FORCE}}, and ''pour''.{{sfnp|Wright|1905|p=5|ps=, §12}} The symbols used by Wright are slightly different: the sound in ''fall, law, saw'' is transcribed as {{IPA|/oː/}} and that in ''more, soar,'' etc. as {{IPA|/oə/}}. Daniel Jones gives an account of the /ɔə/ diphthong, but notes "many speakers of Received English (''sic''), myself among them, do not use the diphthong at all, but replace it always by /ɔː/".{{sfnp|Jones|1967|p=115, para 458}}
* The vowel in words such as ''tour'', ''moor'', ''sure'' used to be {{IPA|/ʊə/}}, but this has merged with {{IPA|/ɔː/}} for many contemporary speakers. The effect of these two mergers (horse-hoarse and moor-more) is to bring about a number of three-way mergers of items which were hitherto distinct, such as ''poor'', ''paw'' and ''pore'' ({{IPA|/pʊə/}}, {{IPA|/pɔː/}}, {{IPA|/pɔə/}}) all becoming {{IPA|/pɔː/}}.
* The {{sc2|DRESS}} vowel and the starting point of the {{sc2|FACE}} diphthong has become lowered from mid {{IPA|[e̞]}} to open-mid {{IPA|[ɛ]}}.<ref>{{cite web |first=Geoff |last=Lindsey |url=http://englishspeechservices.com/blog/funny-old-vowels/ |title=Funny old vowels |date=3 June 2012 |access-date=2 October 2016}}</ref>
* Before the Second World War, the vowel of ''cup'' was a back vowel close to cardinal {{IPA|[ʌ]}} but has since shifted forward to a central position so that {{IPA|[ɐ]}} is more accurate; phonemic transcription of this vowel as /ʌ/ is still common largely for historical reasons.{{sfnp|Roca|Johnson|1999|pp=135, 186}}
* There has been a change in the pronunciation of the unstressed final vowel of 'happy' as a result of a process known as happY-tensing: an older pronunciation of 'happy' would have had the vowel /ɪ/ whereas a more modern pronunciation has a vowel nearer to /iː/.{{sfnp|Trudgill|1999|p=62}} In pronunciation handbooks and dictionaries it is now common to use the symbol /i/ to cover both possibilities. 
* In a number of words where contemporary RP has an unstressed syllable with schwa {{IPA|/ə/}}, older pronunciations had {{IPA|/ɪ/}}, for instance, the final vowel in the following: ''kindness'', ''witness'', ''toilet'', ''fortunate''.<ref name="Robinson, Jonnie 2019">Robinson, Jonnie (24 April 2019). "Received Pronunciation". The British Library. Retrieved 16 December 2019.</ref>
* The {{IPA|/ɛː/}} phoneme (as in ''fair'', ''care'', ''there'') was realized as a centring diphthong {{IPA|[ɛə]}} in the past, whereas many present-day speakers of RP pronounce it as a long monophthong {{IPAblink|ɛː}}.<ref name="Robinson, Jonnie 2019"/>
* A change in the symbolisation of the GOAT diphthong reflects a change in the pronunciation of the starting point: older accounts of this diphthong describe it as starting with [ö̞], moving towards [u].<ref>{{cite book |last1=Jones |first1=Daniel |title=An outline of English phonetics |date=1957 |publisher=Heffer |isbn=978-0521210980 |page=101, para 394 |edition=9th}}</ref> This was often symbolized as /ou/ or /oʊ/. In modern RP the starting point is unrounded and central, and is symbolized /əʊ/.<ref name="Wells">{{cite web |last=Wells |first=John |title=Whatever happened to Received Pronunciation? |url=http://www.phon.ucl.ac.uk/home/wells/rphappened.htm |date=27 January 1994 |access-date=24 August 2011}}</ref>
* In a study of a group of speakers born between 1981 and 1993, it was observed that the vowel {{IPA|/ɒ/}} had shifted upwards, approaching {{IPAblink|ɔ}} in quality.{{sfnp|Wikström|2013|p=45|ps=. "It seems to be the case that younger RP or near-RP speakers typically use a closer quality, possibly approaching Cardinal 6 considering that the quality appears to be roughly intermediate between that used by older speakers for the LOT vowel and that used for the THOUGHT vowel, while older speakers use a more open quality, between Cardinal Vowels 13 and 6."}}
* The vowels {{IPA|/ʊ/}} and {{IPA|/uː/}} have undergone fronting and reduction in the amount of lip-rounding{{sfnp|Collins|Mees|2013|p=207}} (phonetically, these can be transcribed {{IPAblink|ʊ̈|ʊ̜̈}} and {{IPAblink|ʉː|ʉ̜ː}}, respectively). 
* As noted above, {{IPA|/æ/}} has become more open, near to cardinal {{IPAblink|a}}.{{sfnp|de Jong|McDougall|Hudson|Nolan|2007|pp=1814–5}}{{sfnp|Roach|2011}}<ref name="Wells"/>

{| class="wikitable"
|+
!'''Keyword'''
!'''[https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.14973/page/n5/mode/2up?view=theater Older RP]'''
!'''Traditional'''

'''RP'''
!'''Modern'''

'''RP'''
|-
!'''commA'''
| colspan="3" rowspan="2" |ə
|-
!'''lettER'''
|-
!'''TRAP'''
| colspan="2" |æ
|a
|-
!'''BATH'''
| colspan="3" rowspan="3" |ɑ̟ː
|-
!'''PALM'''
|-
!'''START'''
|-
!'''LOT'''
| colspan="2" |ɒ
| rowspan="2" |ɔ
|-
!'''CLOTH'''
| rowspan="3" |ɔː
| rowspan="4" |o̞ː
|-
!'''THOUGHT'''
| rowspan="3" |o̞ː
|-
!'''NORTH'''
|-
!'''FORCE'''
|(ɔə~)ɔː
|-
!'''STRUT'''
|ʌ̈
|ɐ
|ɐ~ʌ̈~ɑ̈
|-
!'''FOOT'''
| colspan="2" |ʊ
|ɵ
|-
!'''GOOSE'''
|uː
|ʊu̟
|ʊ̈ʉ~ɪ̈ɨ
|-
!'''CURE'''
| colspan="2" |ʊə
|o̞ː
|-
!'''DRESS'''
| colspan="2" |e̞
|ɛ
|-
!'''KIT'''
| colspan="2" rowspan="2" |ɪ
|ɪ̞
|-
!'''happY'''
| rowspan="2" |ɪi
|-
!'''FLEECE'''
|iː
|ɪi
|-
!'''NEAR'''
| colspan="2" |ɪə
|ɪə~ɪː
|-
!'''NURSE'''
| colspan="3" |əː~ɜː
|-
!'''FACE'''
| colspan="2" |e̞ɪ
|ɛɪ
|-
!'''SQUARE'''
| colspan="2" |ɛə
|ɛə~ɛː
|-
!'''GOAT'''
|ö̞ʊ
|əʊ
|əʉ
|-
!'''PRICE'''
|aɪ
|äɪ
|ɑ̟ɪ
|-
!'''MOUTH'''
|äʊ
|ɑ̟ʊ
|aʊ
|-
!'''CHOICE'''
|ɔɪ
| colspan="2" |ɔ̝ɪ
|}

===Consonants===

* For speakers of Received Pronunciation in the late 19th century, it was common for the consonant combination {{angbr|wh}} (as in ''which'', ''whistle'', ''whether'') to be realised as a voiceless labio-velar fricative {{IPA|/ʍ/}} (also transcribed {{IPA|/hw/}}), as can still be heard in the 21st century in the speech of many speakers in Ireland, Scotland and parts of the US. Since the beginning of the 20th century, however, the {{IPA|/ʍ/}} phoneme has ceased to be a feature of RP, except in an exaggeratedly precise style of speaking (the wine-whine merger).{{sfnp|Wells|1982|pp=228–9}}
* There has been considerable growth in glottalization in RP, most commonly in the form of glottal reinforcement. This has been noted by writers on RP since quite early in the 20th century.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Ward |first1=Ida |title=The Phonetics of English |date=1939 |pages=135–6, para 250 |edition=3rd}}</ref> Ward notes pronunciations such as [njuːʔtrəl] for ''neutral'' and [reʔkləs] for ''reckless''. Glottalization of /tʃ/ is widespread in present-day RP when at the end of a stressed syllable, as in ''butcher'' [bʊʔtʃə].<ref>{{cite book |last1=Collins |first1=Beverley |last2=Mees |first2=Inger |title=Practical English Phonetics and Phonology |date=2019 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1-138-59150-9 |pages=67 |edition=4th}}</ref>
* The realization of /r/ as a tap or flap [ɾ] has largely disappeared from RP, though it can be heard in films and broadcasts from the first half of the 20th century. The word ''very'' was frequently pronounced [veɾɪ]. The same sound, however, is sometimes pronounced as an allophone of /t/ when it occurs intervocalically after a stressed syllable – the "flapped /t/" that is familiar in American English. Phonetically, this sounds more like /d/, and this pronunciation is sometimes known as /t/-voicing.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Collins |first1=Beverley |last2=Mees |first2=Inger |title=Practical English Phonetics and Phonology |date=2019 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1-138-59150-9 |page=69 |edition=4th}}</ref>

===Word-specific changes===

A number of cases can be identified where changes in the pronunciation of individual words, or small groups of words, have taken place.

* The word ''Mass'' (referring to the religious ritual) was often pronounced /mɑːs/ in older versions of RP, but the word is now almost always /mæs/.
* The indefinite article ''an'' was traditionally used before a sounded /h/ if immediately followed by an unstressed vowel, as in 'an hyaena.'<ref>{{Cite book|last=Walker|first=John|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=9OsIAAAAQAAJ&q=%22An+must+be+used+before+all+words+beginning%22|title=A critical pronouncing dictionary|date=1824|pages=25|language=en}}</ref> This is now uncommon, especially in speech, and may be confined only to some of the more frequently used words, such as 'horrific' and 'historical.'<ref>{{Cite book|title=The Chambers Dictionary|publisher=Chambers|year=2003|isbn=0-550-10105-5|edition=9th|chapter=an}}</ref><ref name="simpson">Simpson, J. A., & Weiner, E. S. C. (1989). Oxford English Dictionary (Second ed.). New York: [[Organization:Oxford University Press|Oxford University Press]].</ref><ref>{{Cite web|last=Wordsworth|first=Dot|title=An historic {{!}} The Spectator|url=https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/an-historic|access-date=2022-02-17|website=www.spectator.co.uk|date=6 April 2017 |language=en}}</ref>

==Comparison with other varieties of English==
* Like most other varieties of English outside Northern England, RP has undergone the ''foot''–''strut'' split: pairs like ''put''/''putt'' are pronounced differently.{{sfnp|Wells|1982|pp=196 ff}}
* RP is a non-rhotic accent, so {{IPA|/r/}} does not occur unless followed immediately by a vowel. Pairs such as ''father''/''farther'', ''caught''/''court'' and ''formally''/''formerly'' are homophones.{{sfnp|Wells|1982|p=76}}
* Unlike a number of North American accents of English, RP has not undergone the ''Mary''–''marry''–''merry'', ''nearer''–''mirror'', or ''hurry''–''furry'' mergers: all these words are distinct from each other.{{sfnp|Wells|1982|p=245}}
* Unlike many North American accents, RP has not undergone the ''father''–''bother'' or ''cot''–''caught'' mergers.
* RP does not have yod-dropping after {{IPA|/n/}}, {{IPA|/t/}}, {{IPA|/d/}}, {{IPA|/z/}} and {{IPA|/θ/}}, but most speakers of RP have ''yod''-dropping after {{IPA|/s/}} and {{IPA|/l/}}. Hence, for example, ''new'', ''tune'', ''dune'', ''resume'' and ''enthusiasm'' are pronounced {{IPA|/njuː/}}, {{IPA|/tjuːn/}}, {{IPA|/djuːn/}}, {{IPA|/rɪˈzjuːm/}} and {{IPA|/ɪnˈθjuːziæzm/}} rather than {{IPA|/nuː/}}, {{IPA|/tuːn/}}, {{IPA|/duːn/}}, {{IPA|/rɪˈzuːm/}} and {{IPA|/ɪnˈθuːziæzm/}}. This contrasts with many East Anglian and East Midland varieties of English language in England and with many forms of American English, including [[Social:General American|General American]]. In words such as ''pursuit'' and ''evolution'', both pronunciations (with and without {{IPA|/j/}}) are heard in RP. There are, however, several words where a yod has been lost with the passage of time: for example, the word ''suit'' originally had a yod in RP but this is now extremely rare.
* The flapped variant of {{IPA|/t/}} and {{IPA|/d/}} (as in much of the West Country, Ulster, most North American varieties including General American, Australian English, and the Cape Coloured dialect of South Africa) is not used very often. 
* RP has undergone the ''wine''–''whine'' merger (so the sequence {{IPA|/hw/}} is not present except among those who have acquired this distinction as the result of speech training).{{sfnp|Wells|1982|pp=228 ff}} The Royal Academy of Dramatic Art, based in London, still teaches these two sounds for international breadth as distinct phonemes. They are also distinct from one another in most of Scotland and Ireland, in the northeast of England, and in the southeastern United States.{{sfnp|Wells|1982|pp=228 ff}}
* Unlike some other varieties of English language in England, there is no ''h''-dropping in words like ''head'' or ''horse''.{{sfnp|Wells|1982|pp=253 ff}} In hurried phrases such as "as hard as he could" h-dropping commonly applies to the word ''he''.
* Unlike most Southern Hemisphere English and North American English accents, RP has not undergone the weak vowel merger, meaning that pairs such as ''Lenin''/''Lennon'' are distinct.{{sfnp|Wells|1982|pp=167 ff}}
*In traditional RP {{IPA|[ɾ]}} is an allophone of {{IPA|/r/}} (it is used intervocalically after a stressed syllable, after {{IPA|/θ}}, {{IPA|ð/}} and sometimes even after {{IPA|/b}}, {{IPA|ɡ/}}).{{sfnp|Wise|1957|p=242}}{{sfnp|Cruttenden|2008|p=221}}<ref>{{cite book |last1=Collins |first1=Beverley |last2=Mees |first2=Inger |title=Practical English Phonetics and Phonology |date=2019 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1-138-59150-9 |page=52 |edition=4th |quote="A tap was also to be heard '''intervocalically'''{{nbsp}}... from old-fashioned traditional RP speakers{{nbsp}}... It was used for /r/ after a stressed vowel, e.g. ''carry, very, Paris''."}}</ref>

==Spoken specimen==
{{listen
|filename=Recording of speaker of British English (Received Pronunciation).ogg
|title=Specimen of Received Pronunciation
|description=The audio recording on which the transcriptions are based
}}

The ''Journal of the International Phonetic Association'' regularly publishes "Illustrations of the IPA" which present an outline of the phonetics of a particular language or accent. It is usual to base the description on a recording of the traditional story of the North Wind and the Sun. There is an IPA illustration of British English (Received Pronunciation).

The female speaker is described as having been born in 1953 and educated at Oxford University. To accompany the recording there are three transcriptions: orthographic, phonemic and allophonic.

<blockquote>
'''Phonemic'''

{{IPA|ðə ˈnɔːθ ˈwɪnd ən ðə ˈsʌn wə dɪˈspjuːtɪŋ ˈwɪtʃ wəz ðə ˈstrɒŋɡə, wen ə ˈtrævl̩ə ˌkeɪm əˌlɒŋ ˈræpt ɪn ə ˈwɔːm ˈkləʊk. ðeɪ əˈɡriːd ðət ðə ˈwʌn hu ˈfɜːst səkˈsiːdɪd ɪn ˈmeɪkɪŋ ðə ˈtrævlə ˌteɪk hɪz ˈkləʊk ɒf ʃʊd bi kənˌsɪdəd ˈstrɒŋɡə ðən ði ˈʌðə. ˈðen ðə ˌnɔːθ wɪnd ˈbluː əz ˈhɑːd əz i ˈkʊd, bət ðə ˈmɔː hi ˈbluː ðə ˌmɔː ˈkləʊsli dɪd ðə ˈtrævlə ˈfəʊld hɪz ˌkləʊk əˈraʊnd hɪm, ænd ət ˈlɑːst ðə ˈnɔːθ wɪnd ˌɡeɪv ˈʌp ði əˈtempt. ˈðen ðə ˈsʌn ˌʃɒn aʊt ˈwɔːmli, ænd əˈmiːdiətli ðə ˈtrævlə ˈtʊk ɒf ɪz ˈkləʊk. n̩ ˌsəʊ ðə ˈnɔːθ ˈwɪn wəz əˈblaɪdʒd tʊ kənˈfes ðət ðə ˈsʌn wəz ðə ˈstrɒŋɡr̩ əv ðə ˈtuː.}}

'''Allophonic'''

{{IPA|ðə ˈnɔːθ ˈw̥ɪnd ən̪n̪ə ˈsʌn wə dɪˈspj̊u̟ːtɪŋ ˈwɪʔtʃ wəz ðə ˈstɹ̥ɒŋɡə, wen ə ˈtɹ̥ævl̩ə ˌkʰeɪm əˌlɒŋ ˈɹæptʰ ɪn ə ˈwɔːm ˈkl̥əʊkˣ. ðeɪ əˈɡɹ̥iːd̥ ð̥əʔ ðə ˈwʌn ɦu ˈfɜːs səkˈsiːdɪd ɪmˈmeɪxɪŋ ðə ˈtɹ̥ævlə ˌtʰeɪk̟x̟ɪs ˈkl̥əʊk ɒf ʃʊbbi kʰənˌsɪdəd̥ ˈstɹɒŋɡə ð̥ən̪n̪i ˈʌðə. ˈðen̪n̪ə ˌnɔːθ w̥ɪnd ˈbluː əz̥ ˈhɑːd̥ əs i ˈkʊd, bət̬ ð̥ə ˈmɔː hi ˈblu̟ː ðə ˌmɔ ˈkl̥əʊsl̥i d̥ɨd ð̥ə ˈtɹ̥æv̥lə ˈfəʊld̥ hɪz̥ ˌkl̥əʊkʰ əˈɹaʊnd hɪm, ænd ət ˈl̥ɑːst ð̥ə ˈnɔːθ w̥ɪnd ˌɡ̊eɪv̥ ˈʌp ði̥ əˈtʰemʔt. ˈðen̪n̪ə ˈsʌn ˌʃɒn aʊt ˈwɔːmli, ænd əˈmiːdiətl̥i ð̥ə ˈtɹ̥ævlə ˈtʰʊk ɒf ɪz̥ ˈkl̥əʊkˣ. n̩ ˌsəʊ ðə ˈnɔːθ ˈw̥ɪn wəz̥ əˈblaɪdʒ̊ tʰɵ kʰənˈfes ð̥əʔ ð̥ə ˈsʌn wəz̥z̥ə ˈstɹ̥ɒŋɡɹ̩ əv̥ ð̥ə ˈtʰu̟ː.}}

'''Orthographic'''

The North Wind and the Sun were disputing which was the stronger, when a traveller came along wrapped in a warm cloak. They agreed that the one who first succeeded in making the traveller take his cloak off should be considered stronger than the other. Then the North Wind blew as hard as he could, but the more he blew the more closely did the traveller fold his cloak around him, and at last the North Wind gave up the attempt. Then the Sun shone out warmly, and immediately the traveller took off his cloak. And so the North Wind was obliged to confess that the Sun was the stronger of the two.{{sfnp|Roach|2004}}
</blockquote>

==Notable speakers==<!--READ FIRST: Please do not add entries into this list without a citation from a reliable source. All entries without a citation will be removed. Thank you.-->
[[File:Sir David Attenborough BBC Radio4 Desert Island Discs 29 Jan 2012 b01b8yy0.flac|thumb|David Attenborough's voice]]
[[File:Gyles Brandreth BBC Radio4 Desert Island Discs 14 January 2011 b00x8f2l.flac|thumb|Gyles Brandreth's voice]]
[[File:Stephen Fry voice.flac|thumb|Stephen Fry's voice]]
The following people have been described as RP speakers:
<!--Don't add names unless appropriately cited--><!--please follow ABC order and sort by surname-->
* The British Royal Family<ref name="Wells 2011">{{cite web |last=Wells |first=John |title=the evidence of the vows |url=http://phonetic-blog.blogspot.com/2011/05/evidence-of-vows.html |website=John Wells's phonetic blog |date=3 May 2011}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last=Wells |first=John |title=Any young U-RP speakers? |date=11 July 2007 |url=http://www.phon.ucl.ac.uk/home/wells/blog0707a.htm}}</ref>
* [[Biography:David Attenborough|David Attenborough]], broadcaster and naturalist<ref>{{cite web |last=Wells |first=John |title=David Attenborough |url=http://phonetic-blog.blogspot.com/2010/11/david-attenborough.html |website=John Wells's phonetic blog |date=8 November 2010}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Cho |first1=Juhyung |title=Vowel changes in the speech of Sir David Attenborough |journal=SNU Working Papers in English Language and Linguistics |date=1 January 2022 |volume=18 |hdl=10371/176946 |url=https://hdl.handle.net/10371/176946 |access-date=18 March 2022 |language=en}}</ref>
* Gyles Brandreth, broadcaster, writer and former politician<ref>{{cite web|url=https://trufluency.com/7-best-english-podcasts-free-and-paid/|title=7 Best English Podcasts (Free and Paid) |website=TruFluency |access-date=3 July 2023|quote="Gyles Brandreth and Susie Dent are the hosts of Something Rhymes with Purple,{{nbsp}}... the speech of the hosts tends to show features of the Received Pronunciation (RP) English accent,{{nbsp}}..."}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.gylesbrandreth.net/blog/2018/12/23/am-i-posh-is-david-dimbleby-are-you|title=Am I posh? Is David Dimbleby? Are you?|last=Brandreth|first=Gyles|date=23 December 2018|website=GYLES BRANDRETH|access-date=3 July 2023|quote="...{{nbsp}}I have a 'posh' accent.  In fact, I sound much less fruity and plummy than I used to do.  (So does The Queen, incidentally.)  I sound very like my father, and English middle class professional people of his generation (he was born in 1910) sounded like he sounded and I sound now."}}</ref>
* David Cameron, former Prime Minister of the UK (2010–2016)<ref>{{cite web |last=Wells |first=John |title=EE, yet again |url=http://phonetic-blog.blogspot.com/2010/04/ee-yet-again.html |website=John Wells's phonetic blog |date=8 April 2010}}</ref>
* Deborah Cavendish, Duchess of Devonshire, aristocrat and writer<ref name="woods">{{cite news|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/tvandradio/8684273/When-I-didnt-know-owt-about-posh-speak.html |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220111/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/tvandradio/8684273/When-I-didnt-know-owt-about-posh-speak.html |archive-date=11 January 2022 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live|title=When I didn't know owt about posh speak|first=Vicki|last=Woods|date=5 August 2011|work=The Daily Telegraph}}{{cbignore}}</ref>
* Judi Dench, actress<ref name="lawson">{{cite web|last=Lawson|first=Lindsey|date=14 October 2013|url=http://www.thevoicecafe.net/the-voice-cafe-blog/the-accent-with-few-native-speakers-in-Britain-RP|title=A popular British accent with very few native speakers|work=The Voice Cafe|access-date=12 December 2017}}</ref>
* Rupert Everett, actor<ref name="Wells 2008blog"/>
* Lady Antonia Fraser, author and historian<ref name="woods"/>
* [[Biography:Stephen Fry|Stephen Fry]], actor and writer<ref>{{cite web|title=RP: A popular British accent with very few native speakers |date=13 October 2014 |url=https://www.thevoicecafe.net/the-voice-cafe-blog/the-accent-with-few-native-speakers-in-Britain-RP |quote=Examples of speakers of the more "conservative" type of RP are Stephen Fry and Dame Judi Dench.}} </ref>
* [[Biography:Christopher Hitchens|Christopher Hitchens]], late author and journalist<ref>{{cite web|url=http://dialectblog.com/british-accents/|title=British Accents|date=25 January 2011|work=dialectblog.com}}</ref>
* Boris Johnson, former Prime Minister of the UK (2019–2022)<ref name="Wells 2008blog">{{cite web |last=Wells |first=John |title=RP back in fashion? |date=12 June 2008a |url=http://www.phon.ucl.ac.uk/home/wells/blog0806a.htm}}</ref>
* Vanessa Kirby, actress<ref name="lawson"/>
* Joanna Lumley, actress<ref>{{Cite news|last=Stadlen|first=Matthew|date=2015-07-10|title=Joanna Lumley: I'm not posh - and I eat like a horse|journal=Daily Telegraph|language=en-GB|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/celebritynews/11731188/joanna-lumley-acting-interview-drama.html |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220111/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/celebritynews/11731188/joanna-lumley-acting-interview-drama.html |archive-date=11 January 2022 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live|access-date=2020-08-09|issn=0307-1235}}{{cbignore}}</ref>
* Helen Mirren, actress<ref>Klaus J. Kohler (2017) "Communicative Functions and Linguistic Forms in Speech Interaction", published by CUP (page 268)</ref>
* Carey Mulligan, actress<ref name="lawson"/>
* Jeremy Paxman, broadcaster and TV presenter<ref name="woods"/>
* Jacob Rees-Mogg, former leader of the House of Commons (2019–2022)<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-40554137|title=Labour MP Angela Rayner : 'I'm proud of my accent'|work=BBC News|quote=Tory MP Jacob Rees-Mogg struggled with his "posh RP [received pronunciation] accent" when he was trying to get elected in Fife.|date=10 July 2017|accessdate=9 February 2021}}</ref>
* Brian Sewell, art critic<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/voices/yourvoice/accent2.shtml|title= Voices - Your Voice|website=BBC }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://i-m-magazine.com/brian-sewell/|title=Brian Sewell}}</ref>
* Ed Stourton, broadcaster and journalist<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/tvandradio/bbc/11140150/A-posh-RP-voice-can-break-down-barriers.html |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220111/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/tvandradio/bbc/11140150/A-posh-RP-voice-can-break-down-barriers.html |archive-date=11 January 2022 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live|title=A 'posh' RP voice can break down barriers|first=Glenda|last=Cooper|date=4 October 2014|work=The Daily Telegraph}}{{cbignore}}</ref>
* Margaret Thatcher, former Prime Minister of the UK (1979–1990)<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/uk-22183566/why-people-change-the-way-they-speak|title=Has Beckham started talking posh?|work=BBC News}}</ref>
* Emma Watson, actress<ref>{{cite book |last1=Nolan |first1=Dave |last2=Nolan |first2=David |title=Emma Watson: The Biography |date=24 November 2011 |publisher=Kings Road Publishing |isbn=978-1-84358-871-9 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=kSGtDwAAQBAJ&dq=emma+watson+received+pronunciation&pg=PT34 |language=en |quote="Emma speaks her lines with crystal-clear received pronunciation..."}}</ref>
* Justin Welby, [[Religion:Archbishop of Canterbury|Archbishop of Canterbury]] (2013–present)<ref name="Wells 2011"/>
* Rowan Williams, former Archbishop of Canterbury (2002–2012)<ref name="Wells 2011"/>

== See also ==
* Accents (psychology)
* English language spelling reform
* Mid-Atlantic accent
* [[Social:Linguistic prescription|Linguistic prescription]]
* [[Social:Prestige (sociolinguistics)|Prestige (sociolinguistics)]]
* [[Social:U and non-U English|U and non-U English]]

== Notes and references ==
{{Reflist}}

== Bibliography ==
{{Refbegin|30em}}
* {{citation
 |last1=Collins
 |first1=Beverley
 |last2=Mees
 |first2=Inger M.
 |year=2003
 |orig-year=First published 1981
 |title=The Phonetics of English and Dutch
 |edition=5th
 |place=Leiden
 |publisher=Brill Publishers
 |isbn=9004103406
 }}
* {{citation
 |last1=Collins
 |first1=Beverley
 |last2=Mees
 |first2=Inger
 |year=2013
 |orig-year=First published 2003
 |title=Practical Phonetics and Phonology: A Resource Book for Students
 |edition=3rd
 |publisher=Routledge
 |isbn=978-0-415-50650-2
 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=faVJTQIw9eQC
 }}
* {{citation
 |last=Cruttenden
 |first=Alan
 |year=2008
 |title=Gimson's Pronunciation of English
 |publisher=Hodder
 |location=London
 |edition=7th
 |isbn=978-0340958773
 }}
* {{citation
  |last=Cruttenden
  |first=Alan
  |year=2014
  |title=Gimson's Pronunciation of English
  |publisher=Routledge
  |edition=8th
  |isbn=9781444183092
  |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=M2nMAgAAQBAJ
}}
* {{citation
 |last=Crystal
 |first=David
 |year=2003
 |title=The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the English Language
 |publisher=Cambridge University Press
 |edition=2nd
 |isbn=0-521-53033-4
 }}
* {{citation
 |last=Crystal
 |first=David
 |title=The Stories of English
 |year=2005
 |publisher=Penguin
 }}
* {{citation
 |last=DuPonceau
 |first=Peter S.
 |year=1818
 |chapter=English phonology; or, An essay towards an analysis and description of the component sounds of the English language.
 |title=Transactions of the American Philosophical Society
 |volume=1
 |pages=259–264
 }}
* {{citation
 |last=Ellis
 |first=Alexander J.
 |year=1869
 |title=On early English pronunciation
 |publisher=Greenwood Press
 |location=New York, (1968)
 }}
* {{citation
 |last=Elmes
 |first=Simon
 |year=2005
 |title=Talking for Britain: A journey through the voices of our nation
 |publisher=Penguin
 |isbn=0-14-051562-3
 }}
* {{citation
 |doi=10.2307/324550
 |last=Fishman
 |first=Joshua
 |title="Standard" versus "Dialect" in Bilingual Education: An Old Problem in a New Context
 |journal=The Modern Language Journal
 |volume=61
 |issue=7
 |pages=315–325
 |year=1977
 |jstor=324550
 }}
* {{citation
 |last=Gimson
 |first=Alfred C.
 |year=1970
 |title=An Introduction to the pronunciation of English
 |location=London
 |publisher=Edward Arnold
 }}
* {{citation
 |last=Gimson
 |first=Alfred C.
 |year=1980
 |title=Pronunciation of English
 |edition=3rd
 }}
* {{citation
 |last1=Gupta
 |first1=Anthea Fraser
 |title=Baths and becks
 |journal=English Today
 |volume=21
 |issue=1
 |year=2005
 |pages=21–27
 |issn=0266-0784
 |doi=10.1017/S0266078405001069
 |s2cid=54620954
 |url=http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/1810/1/guptaaf2.pdf
 }}
* {{citation
 |last1=Halle
 |first1=Morris
 |last2=Mohanan
 |first2=K. P.
 |title=Segmental Phonology of Modern English
 |year=1985
 |journal=Linguistic Inquiry
 |volume=16
 |issue=1
 |pages=57–116
 |publisher=The MIT Press
 |jstor=4178420
 }}
* {{citation
 |doi=10.1017/S0022226700007052
 |last=Hudson
 |first=Richard
 |year=1981
 |title=Some Issues on Which Linguists Can Agree
 |journal=Journal of Linguistics
 |volume=17
 |issue=2
 |pages=333–343
 |s2cid=144125788
 }}
* {{citation
 |author=International Phonetic Association
 |title=Handbook of the International Phonetic Association: A guide to the use of the International Phonetic Alphabet
 |year=1999
 |publisher=Cambridge University Press
 |isbn=978-0521637510
 }}
* {{citation
 |last=Jenkins
 |first=Jennifer
 |year=2000
 |title=The Phonology of English as an International Language
 |publisher=Oxford
 }}
* {{citation
 |last=Jones
 |first=Daniel
 |year=1917
 |title=English Pronouncing Dictionary
 |publisher=Dent
 |place=London
 |edition=1st
 }}
* {{citation
 |last=Jones
 |first=Daniel
 |year=1926
 |title=English Pronouncing Dictionary
 |edition=2nd
 }}
* {{citation
 |last=Jones
 |first=Daniel
 |year=1967
 |title=An Outline of English Phonetics
 |edition=9th
 |publisher=Heffer
 }}
* {{citation
 |last=Jones
 |first=Daniel
 |editor1-last=Roach
 |editor1-first=Peter
 |editor2-last=Setter
 |editor2-first=Jane
 |editor3-last=Esling
 |editor3-first=John
 |year=2011
 |title=Cambridge English Pronouncing Dictionary
 |publisher=Cambridge University Press
 |edition=18th
 }}
* {{citation
 |last1=de Jong
 |first1=Gea
 |last2=McDougall
 |first2=Kirsty
 |last3=Hudson
 |first3=Toby
 |last4=Nolan
 |first4=Francis
 |year=2007
 |chapter=The speaker discriminating power of sounds undergoing historical change: A formant-based study
 |title=the Proceedings of ICPhS Saarbrücken
 |pages=1813–1816
 }}
* {{citation
 |last=Ladefoged
 |first=Peter
 |year=2004
 |title=Vowels and Consonants
 |publisher =Thomson
 }}
* {{citation
 |last=Lodge
 |first= Ken
 |year=2009
 |title=A Critical Introduction to Phonetics
 |publisher=Continuum
 }}
* {{citation
 |last=McArthur
 |first=Tom
 |title=The Oxford Guide to World English
 |year=2002
 |publisher=Oxford University Press
 }}
* {{citation
 |doi=10.2307/373636
 |last=McDavid
 |first=Raven I.
 |year=1965
 |title=American Social Dialects
 |journal=College English
 |volume=26
 |issue=4
 |pages=254–260
 |jstor=373636
 }}
* {{citation
 |last=Mugglestone
 |first=Lynda
 |year=2003
 |title='Talking Proper': The Rise of Accent as Social Symbol
 |edition=2nd
 |publisher=Oxford University Press
 }}
* {{citation
 |last=Newbrook
 |first=Mark
 |editor1-last=Foulkes
 |editor1-first=Paul
 |editor2-last=Docherty
 |editor2-first=Gerald J.
 |chapter=West Wirral: norms, self-reports and usage
 |title=Urban Voices
 |year=1999
 |pages=90–106
 }}
* {{citation
 |last=Pearce
 |first=Michael
 |title=The Routledge Dictionary of English Language Studies
 |year=2007
 |publisher=Routledge
 }}
* {{citation
 |editor-last=Pearsall
 |editor-first=Judy
 |title=The Concise Oxford English Dictionary
 |year=1999
 |edition=10th
 }}
* {{citation
 |last=Petyt
 |first=K. M.
 |title=Dialect and Accent in Industrial West Yorkshire
 |year=1985
 |publisher=John Benjamins Publishing
 }}
* {{citation
 |last=Ramsaran
 |first=Susan
 |chapter=RP: fact and fiction
 |title=Studies in the Pronunciation of English: A commemorative volume in honour of A. C. Gimson
 |year=1990
 |pages=178–190
 |publisher=Routledge
}}
* {{citation
 |doi=10.1017/S0025100304001768
 |last=Roach
 |first=Peter
 |year=2004
 |title=British English: Received Pronunciation
 |journal=Journal of the International Phonetic Association
 |volume=34
 |issue=2
 |pages=239–245
 |s2cid=144338519
 |url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/D4AFF0A7118E7081ACF7C7586FF87590/S0025100304001768a.pdf/british_english_received_pronunciation.pdf
 |doi-access=free
 }}
* {{citation
 |last=Roach
 |first=Peter
 |title=English Phonetics and Phonology
 |edition=4th
 |year=2009
 |publisher=Cambridge University Press
 |isbn=978-0-521-40718-2
 }}
* {{Citation
 |last=Roach
 |first=Peter
 |year=2011
 |title=Cambridge English Pronouncing Dictionary
 |edition=18th
 |place=Cambridge
 |publisher=Cambridge University Press
 |isbn=9780521152532
 }}
* {{citation
 |last1=Roca
 |first1=Iggy
 |last2=Johnson
 |first2=Wyn
 |year=1999
 |title=A Course in Phonology
 |publisher=Blackwell Publishing
 }}
* {{citation
 |last=Rogaliński
 |first=Paweł
 |year=2011
 |title=British Accents: Cockney, RP, Estuary English
 |place=Łódź
 |isbn=978-83-272-3282-3
 }}
* {{citation
 |last=Schmitt
 |first=Holger
 |year=2007
 |title=The case for the epsilon symbol ({{IPA|ɛ}}) in RP DRESS
 |journal=Journal of the International Phonetic Association
 |volume=37
 |issue=3
 |pages=321–328
 |doi=10.1017/S0025100307003131
 |s2cid=143444452
 }}
* {{citation
 |last=Shockey
 |first=Linda
 |year=2003
 |title=Sound Patterns of Spoken English
 |publisher=Blackwell
 }}
* {{citation
 |last=Trudgill
 |first=Peter
 |year=1999
 |title=The Dialects of England
 |publisher=Blackwell
 }}
* {{citation
 |last=Upton
 |first=Clive
 |chapter=Received Pronunciation
 |title=A Handbook of Varieties of English
 |year=2004
 |pages=217–230
 |publisher=Walter de Gruyter
 }}
* {{citation
 |last1=Upton
 |first1=Clive
 |last2=Kretzschmar
 |first2=William A.
 |last3=Konopka
 |first3=Rafal
 |year=2001
 |title=Oxford Dictionary of Pronunciation for Current English
 |publisher=Oxford University Press
 |location=Oxford
 }}
* {{citation
 |doi=10.1017/S0022226700002632
 |last=Wells
 |first=John C.
 |year=1970
 |title=Local accents in England and Wales
 |journal=Journal of Linguistics
 |volume=6
 |issue=2
 |pages=231–252
 |s2cid=143523909
 }}
* {{citation 
 |last=Wells
 |first=John C. 
 |title=Accents of English I: An Introduction
 |location=Cambridge, New York 
 |publisher=Cambridge University Press
 |year=1982 
 |isbn=0-521-29719-2 
 }}
* {{citation
 |last=Wells
 |first=John C.
 |year=2008
 |title=Longman Pronunciation Dictionary
 |edition=3rd
 |publisher=Longman
 |isbn=9781405881180
 }}
* {{citation
 |last=Wiik
 |first=K.
 |year=1965
 |title=Finnish and English Vowels
 |publisher=Annales Universitatis Turkensis
 |series=B
 |volume=94
 }}
* {{citation
 |last=Wikström
 |first=Jussi
 |year=2013
 |title=An acoustic study of the RP English LOT and THOUGHT vowels
 |pages=37–47
 |journal=Journal of the International Phonetic Association
 |volume=43
 |issue=1
 |doi=10.1017/S0025100312000345
 |s2cid=146863401
 }}
* {{citation
 |last=Wise
 |first=Claude Merton
 |title=Introduction to phonetics
 |location=Englewood Cliffs
 |year=1957
 }}
* {{citation
 |last=Wright
 |first=Joseph
 |year=1905
 |title=English Dialect Grammar
 }}
* {{citation
 |last=Wyld
 |first=Henry C. K.
 |year=1927
 |title=A short history of English
 |edition=3rd
 |publisher=Murray
 |location=London
 }}
{{Refend}}

== External links ==
* [http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/routesofenglish/storysofar/posh.shtml BBC page on Upper RP as spoken by the English upper-classes]
* [http://www.bl.uk/learning/langlit/sounds/case-studies/received-pronunciation/ Sounds Familiar?]{{spaced ndash}}Listen to examples of received pronunciation on the British Library's 'Sounds Familiar' website
* [http://www.lel.ed.ac.uk/research/gsound/Eng/Direct/Englishes/SglLgRPStandard.htm 'Hover & Hear' R.P.], and compare it with other accents from the UK and around the World.
* [http://www.phon.ucl.ac.uk/home/wells/rphappened.htm Whatever happened to Received Pronunciation?] – An article by the phonetician J. C. Wells about received pronunciation

'''Sources of regular comment on RP'''
* [http://phonetic-blog.blogspot.com/ John Wells's phonetic blog]
* [http://www.yek.me.uk/Blog.html Jack Windsor Lewis's PhonetiBlog]
* [http://www.linguism.co.uk/ ''Linguism – Language in a word'', blog by Graham Pointon of the BBC Pronunciation Unit]

'''Audio files'''
* [http://www.bl.uk/learning/langlit/sounds/text-only/received-pronunciation/blagdon-hall/ Blagdon Hall, Northumberland]
* [http://www.bl.uk/learning/langlit/sounds/text-only/received-pronunciation/burnham-thorpe/ Burnham Thorpe, Norfolk]
* [http://www.bl.uk/learning/langlit/sounds/text-only/received-pronunciation/harrow-school/ Harrow]
* [http://www.bl.uk/learning/langlit/sounds/text-only/received-pronunciation/hexam/ Hexham, Northumberland]
* [http://www.bl.uk/learning/langlit/sounds/text-only/received-pronunciation/london/ London]
* [http://www.bl.uk/learning/langlit/sounds/text-only/received-pronunciation/newport/ Newport, Pembrokeshire]
* [http://www.bl.uk/learning/langlit/sounds/text-only/received-pronunciation/teddington/ Teddington]


[[Category:Standard languages]]

{{Sourceattribution|Received Pronunciation}}