In the Beginning... Was the Command Line: Difference between revisions
imported>Ohm link |
fixing |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{short description|Essay by Neal Stephenson}} | {{short description|Essay by Neal Stephenson}}{{Infobox book | ||
| image = Neal-Stephenson-in-the-beginning.jpg | |||
| author = Neal Stephenson | |||
| isbn = 978-0380815937 | |||
| pub_date = 1999 | |||
}} | |||
{{italic title}} | {{italic title}} | ||
'''''In the Beginning... Was the Command Line''''' is an essay by Neal Stephenson which was originally published online in 1999 and later made available in book form (November 1999, {{ISBN|978-0380815937}}). The essay is a commentary on why the proprietary [[Operating system|operating system]]s business is unlikely to remain profitable in the future because of competition from [[Free software|free software]]. It also analyzes the corporate/collective culture of the [[Company:Microsoft|Microsoft]], Apple Computer, and [[Free software|free software]] communities. | '''''In the Beginning... Was the Command Line''''' is an essay by Neal Stephenson which was originally published online in 1999 and later made available in book form (November 1999, {{ISBN|978-0380815937}}). The essay is a commentary on why the proprietary [[Operating system|operating system]]s business is unlikely to remain profitable in the future because of competition from [[Free software|free software]]. It also analyzes the corporate/collective culture of the [[Company:Microsoft|Microsoft]], Apple Computer, and [[Free software|free software]] communities. | ||
==Themes== | ==Themes== | ||
Stephenson explores the [[Graphical user interface|graphical user interface]] (GUI) as a metaphor in terms of the increasing interposition of abstractions between humans and the actual workings of devices (in a similar manner to ''Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance'') and explains the beauty hackers feel in good-quality tools. He does this with a [[Engineering:Car|car]] analogy. He compares four operating systems, [[Software:Classic Mac OS|Mac OS]] by Apple Computer to a luxury European car, [[Software:Microsoft Windows|Windows]] by [[Company:Microsoft|Microsoft]] to a [[Engineering:Station wagon|station wagon]], [[Software:Linux|Linux]] to a free [[Engineering:Tank|tank]], and [[Software:BeOS|BeOS]] to a batmobile. Stephenson argues that people continue to buy the station wagon despite free tanks being given away, because people do not want to learn how to operate a tank; they know that the station wagon dealership has a machine shop that they can take their car to when it breaks down. Because of this attitude, Stephenson argues that Microsoft is not really a monopoly, as evidenced by the free availability of other choice OSes, but rather has simply accrued enough mindshare among the people to have them coming back. He compares Microsoft to Disney, in that both are selling a vision to their customers, who in turn "want to believe" in that vision. | |||
Stephenson explores the [[Graphical user interface| | |||
Stephenson relays his experience with the Debian bug tracking system ([http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=6518 #6518]). He then contrasts it with Microsoft's approach. Debian developers responded from around the world within a day. He was completely frustrated with his initial attempt to achieve the same response from Microsoft, but he concedes that his subsequent experience was satisfactory. The difference he notes is that Debian developers are personally accessible and transparently own up to defects in their OS distribution, while Microsoft pretends errors don't exist. | Stephenson relays his experience with the Debian bug tracking system ([http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=6518 #6518]). He then contrasts it with Microsoft's approach. Debian developers responded from around the world within a day. He was completely frustrated with his initial attempt to achieve the same response from Microsoft, but he concedes that his subsequent experience was satisfactory. The difference he notes is that Debian developers are personally accessible and transparently own up to defects in their OS distribution, while Microsoft pretends errors don't exist. | ||
==Later developments== | ==Later developments== | ||
[[File:Neal Stephenson 2008 crop.jpg|thumb|Stephenson in 2008]] | |||
The essay was written before the advent of [[Software:Mac OS X|Mac OS X]]. A recurring theme is the full power of the command line compared with easier-to-learn graphical user interfaces (GUIs) which are described as broken mixed metaphors for 'power users'. He then mentions GUIs that have traditional terminals in windows. In a [[Social:Slashdot|Slashdot]] interview in 2004, in response to the question: | The essay was written before the advent of [[Software:Mac OS X|Mac OS X]]. A recurring theme is the full power of the command line compared with easier-to-learn graphical user interfaces (GUIs) which are described as broken mixed metaphors for 'power users'. He then mentions GUIs that have traditional terminals in windows. In a [[Social:Slashdot|Slashdot]] interview in 2004, in response to the question: | ||
| Line 22: | Line 27: | ||
I embraced [[Software:Mac OS X|OS X]] as soon as it was available and have never looked back. So a lot of ''In the Beginning...was the Command Line'' is now obsolete. I keep meaning to update it, but if I'm honest with myself, I have to say this is unlikely.<ref>{{cite web | last=Miller | first=R. | publisher=[[Social:Slashdot|Slashdot]] | url=http://interviews.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/10/20/1518217 | title=Neal Stephenson Responds With Wit and Humor | date=2004-10-20 | access-date=1 February 2010 }}</ref> | I embraced [[Software:Mac OS X|OS X]] as soon as it was available and have never looked back. So a lot of ''In the Beginning...was the Command Line'' is now obsolete. I keep meaning to update it, but if I'm honest with myself, I have to say this is unlikely.<ref>{{cite web | last=Miller | first=R. | publisher=[[Social:Slashdot|Slashdot]] | url=http://interviews.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/10/20/1518217 | title=Neal Stephenson Responds With Wit and Humor | date=2004-10-20 | access-date=1 February 2010 }}</ref> | ||
</blockquote> | </blockquote> | ||
With Neal Stephenson's permission, Garrett Birkel responded to ''In the Beginning...was the Command Line'' in 2004, bringing it up to date and critically discussing Stephenson's argument.<ref>{{cite web | last=Birkel | first=G. | title=The Command Line In 2004 | url=http://garote.bdmonkeys.net/commandline/index.html | date=2004-12-29 | access-date=1 February 2010 }}</ref> Birkel's response is interspersed throughout the original text, which remains untouched. | With Neal Stephenson's permission, Garrett Birkel responded to ''In the Beginning...was the Command Line'' in 2004, bringing it up to date and critically discussing Stephenson's argument.<ref>{{cite web | last=Birkel | first=G. | title=The Command Line In 2004 | url=http://garote.bdmonkeys.net/commandline/index.html | date=2004-12-29 | access-date=1 February 2010 }}</ref> Birkel's response is interspersed throughout the original text, which remains untouched. | ||
| Line 39: | Line 42: | ||
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20150505004034/http://www.uiowa.edu/~c08g001d/Stephenson_Interface.pdf The Interface Culture] from In the beginning... was the command line | * [https://web.archive.org/web/20150505004034/http://www.uiowa.edu/~c08g001d/Stephenson_Interface.pdf The Interface Culture] from In the beginning... was the command line | ||
{{NealStephensonBooks}} | |||
{{DEFAULTSORT:In The Beginning... Was The Command Line}} | {{DEFAULTSORT:In The Beginning... Was The Command Line}} | ||
Latest revision as of 05:48, 15 February 2026
 | |
| Author | Neal Stephenson |
|---|---|
Publication date | 1999 |
| ISBN | 978-0380815937 |
In the Beginning... Was the Command Line is an essay by Neal Stephenson which was originally published online in 1999 and later made available in book form (November 1999, ISBN 978-0380815937). The essay is a commentary on why the proprietary operating systems business is unlikely to remain profitable in the future because of competition from free software. It also analyzes the corporate/collective culture of the Microsoft, Apple Computer, and free software communities.
Themes
Stephenson explores the graphical user interface (GUI) as a metaphor in terms of the increasing interposition of abstractions between humans and the actual workings of devices (in a similar manner to Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance) and explains the beauty hackers feel in good-quality tools. He does this with a car analogy. He compares four operating systems, Mac OS by Apple Computer to a luxury European car, Windows by Microsoft to a station wagon, Linux to a free tank, and BeOS to a batmobile. Stephenson argues that people continue to buy the station wagon despite free tanks being given away, because people do not want to learn how to operate a tank; they know that the station wagon dealership has a machine shop that they can take their car to when it breaks down. Because of this attitude, Stephenson argues that Microsoft is not really a monopoly, as evidenced by the free availability of other choice OSes, but rather has simply accrued enough mindshare among the people to have them coming back. He compares Microsoft to Disney, in that both are selling a vision to their customers, who in turn "want to believe" in that vision.
Stephenson relays his experience with the Debian bug tracking system (#6518). He then contrasts it with Microsoft's approach. Debian developers responded from around the world within a day. He was completely frustrated with his initial attempt to achieve the same response from Microsoft, but he concedes that his subsequent experience was satisfactory. The difference he notes is that Debian developers are personally accessible and transparently own up to defects in their OS distribution, while Microsoft pretends errors don't exist.
Later developments
The essay was written before the advent of Mac OS X. A recurring theme is the full power of the command line compared with easier-to-learn graphical user interfaces (GUIs) which are described as broken mixed metaphors for 'power users'. He then mentions GUIs that have traditional terminals in windows. In a Slashdot interview in 2004, in response to the question:
... have you embraced the new UNIX based MacOS X as the OS you want to use when you "Just want to go to Disneyland"?
he replied:
I embraced OS X as soon as it was available and have never looked back. So a lot of In the Beginning...was the Command Line is now obsolete. I keep meaning to update it, but if I'm honest with myself, I have to say this is unlikely.[1]
With Neal Stephenson's permission, Garrett Birkel responded to In the Beginning...was the Command Line in 2004, bringing it up to date and critically discussing Stephenson's argument.[2] Birkel's response is interspersed throughout the original text, which remains untouched.
See also
References
- ↑ Miller, R. (2004-10-20). "Neal Stephenson Responds With Wit and Humor". Slashdot. http://interviews.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/10/20/1518217.
- ↑ Birkel, G. (2004-12-29). "The Command Line In 2004". http://garote.bdmonkeys.net/commandline/index.html.
External links
- Slashdot: Neal Stephenson responds
- Essay Homepage including link to download the full text
- The Interface Culture from In the beginning... was the command line
 |  |
