Engineering:Zwaardvis-class submarine: Difference between revisions
Wikisleeper (talk | contribs) (over-write) |
(change) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Submarine class}} | {{Short description|Submarine class}} | ||
{{for|World War II era class of submarines|Zwaardvisch class submarine}} | |||
{|{{Infobox ship begin}} | {|{{Infobox ship begin}} | ||
{{Infobox ship image | {{Infobox ship image | ||
|Ship image = | |Ship image = 300px | ||
|Ship caption = ''Zwaardvis'', lead submarine and namesake ship of her class | |Ship caption = ''Zwaardvis'', lead submarine and namesake ship of her class | ||
}} | }} | ||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
|Name = ''Zwaardvis'' class | |Name = ''Zwaardvis'' class | ||
|Builders = *Rotterdamsche Droogdok Maatschappij | |Builders = *Rotterdamsche Droogdok Maatschappij | ||
*Wilton-Fijenoord | *Wilton-Fijenoord | ||
|Operators = *{{Navy|Netherlands}} | |Operators = *{{Navy|Netherlands}} | ||
*{{Navy|Republic of China}} | *{{Navy|Republic of China}} | ||
|Class before = {{sclass| | |Class before = ''Walrus'' class | ||
|Class after = *{{sclass|Walrus|submarine|4}} | |||
*{{sclass|Moray|submarine|4}} (proposed, canceled) | |||
|Subclasses = {{sclass|Hai Lung|submarine|4}} | |Subclasses = {{sclass|Hai Lung|submarine|4}} | ||
|Built range = 1966–1988 | |Built range = 1966–1988 | ||
Line 56: | Line 57: | ||
|} | |} | ||
The '''''Zwaardvis''-class submarine''' ("Swordfish") is a class of conventional attack [[Engineering:Submarine|submarine]]s that were built to strengthen the Royal Netherlands Navy. The Dutch government opted for the choice to not replace the two ''Zwaardvis''-class submarines with either more {{sclass|Walrus|submarine|1}}s, or [[Engineering:Moray-class submarine|submarines of a new design]].<ref>Karremann, "Zwaardvisklasse niet vervangen: hoe Nederland belangrijke onderzeebootbouwkennis verloor".</ref> | The '''''Zwaardvis''-class submarine''' ("Swordfish") is a class of conventional attack [[Engineering:Submarine|submarine]]s that were built to strengthen the Royal Netherlands Navy. The Dutch government opted for the choice to not replace the two ''Zwaardvis''-class submarines with either more {{sclass|Walrus|submarine|1}}s, or [[Engineering:Moray-class submarine|submarines of a new design]].<ref>Karremann, "Zwaardvisklasse niet vervangen: hoe Nederland belangrijke onderzeebootbouwkennis verloor".</ref><ref>{{cite web |author=Jaime Karremann |date=2 October 2015 |title=Zij ontwerpt de nieuwe onderzeeboten |url=https://marineschepen.nl/dossiers/interview-Wendy-van-den-Broek-nieuwe-onderzeeboten.html |website=Marineschepen.nl |language=Dutch}}</ref> | ||
==History== | ==History== | ||
[[File:De tewaterlating van de Zwaardvis (S806) (2158 005841).jpg|thumb|left|Launch of ''Zwaardvis'' in July 1970; sister ship ''Tijgerhaai '' can be seen on the right.]] | [[File:De tewaterlating van de Zwaardvis (S806) (2158 005841).jpg|thumb|left|Launch of ''Zwaardvis'' in July 1970; sister ship ''Tijgerhaai '' can be seen on the right.]] | ||
On 24 December 1965 the Royal Netherlands Navy gave Rotterdamsche Droogdok Maatschappij the order to build two submarines.<ref name="archiefzwaardvis">{{citation|title =Herinneringsboek Hr. Ms. Zwaardvis |url=https://www.rdm-archief.nl/RDM-NB/320-Herinneringsboek.pdf|language=nl|page=4|author=A.H.A.P. van den Enden, A. Goedhart en P. Hamaker|publisher=RDM-collectie Johan Journée|access-date=23 April 2018}}</ref> At the time of this order the Royal Netherlands Navy believed that these two submarines could possibly make use of nuclear propulsion. Like many other navies around the world the Netherlands got interested in nuclear propulsion after the | On 24 December 1965 the Royal Netherlands Navy gave Rotterdamsche Droogdok Maatschappij the order to build two submarines.<ref name="archiefzwaardvis">{{citation|title =Herinneringsboek Hr. Ms. Zwaardvis |url=https://www.rdm-archief.nl/RDM-NB/320-Herinneringsboek.pdf|language=nl|page=4|author=A.H.A.P. van den Enden, A. Goedhart en P. Hamaker|publisher=RDM-collectie Johan Journée|access-date=23 April 2018}}</ref> At the time of this order the Royal Netherlands Navy believed that these two submarines could possibly make use of nuclear propulsion. Like many other navies around the world the Netherlands got interested in nuclear propulsion after the [[United States]] had put {{USS|Nautilus|SSN-571|6}} into active service in 1955. The performance of this and succeeding nuclear submarine, such as the {{sclass|Skate|submarine|1}}s, were very promising at the time.<ref>W. Vinke, "De voortstuwing van schepen door middel van kernenergie" in: Militaire Spectator - Wetenschappelijke jaarberichten 127 (1958) p.21-22.</ref> It made the Dutch navy believe that nuclear submarines would play a crucial role in the future and not developing one would mean to be left behind by other navies who were focusing on nuclear submarines.<ref name="marineschepenzwaardvis">Karremann, "Zwaardvisklasse onderzeeboten".</ref> | ||
[[File:Bouw van de Zwaardvis (S806, 1972-1994) en de Tijgerhaai (S807, 1972-1995) bij de Rotterdamsche Droogdok Maatschappij (2158 016941).jpg|thumb|left|Construction of the torpedo tube launchers for ships of the class]] | [[File:Bouw van de Zwaardvis (S806, 1972-1994) en de Tijgerhaai (S807, 1972-1995) bij de Rotterdamsche Droogdok Maatschappij (2158 016941).jpg|thumb|left|Construction of the torpedo tube launchers for ships of the class]] | ||
In addition, the Royal Netherlands Navy was afraid that the diesel-electric {{sclass|Dolfijn|submarine|1}}s which had just entered service were no match for nuclear submarines. This would be problematic since the ''Dolfijn''-class submarines were the most modern submarines the Dutch navy had at the time in their inventory. Furthermore, it was also a blow to the Dutch navy because their submarine fleet were just getting into the shape the navy had envisioned after the devastating Second World War.<ref>de Bles, Boven and Homburg, p. 95.</ref> Besides Royal Netherlands Navy, Dutch naval experts at the time also stressed in numerous articles how important nuclear submarines were and that there would not be such a big technological leap forward again in at least a decade.<ref>F.B. Hamilton, "De ontwikkeling van het Onderzeeboot-wapen" in: Militaire Spectator - Wetenschappelijke jaarberichten 132 (1963) p.37.</ref> These kind of statements and recommendations also encouraged the Royal Netherlands Navy to start thinking about acquiring nuclear submarines. In the meanwhile the keel laying of the two submarines that the Dutch navy had ordered took place on 14 July 1966. {{HNLMS|Zwaardvis|S806|2}} was assigned building number 320, while {{HNLMS|Tijgerhaai|S807|2}} was assigned building number 321. The two names were awarded by Queen Juliana of the Netherlands, on 7 September.<ref name="archiefzwaardvis"/> | In addition, the Royal Netherlands Navy was afraid that the diesel-electric {{sclass|Dolfijn|submarine|1}}s which had just entered service were no match for nuclear submarines. This would be problematic since the ''Dolfijn''-class submarines were the most modern submarines the Dutch navy had at the time in their inventory. Furthermore, it was also a blow to the Dutch navy because their submarine fleet were just getting into the shape the navy had envisioned after the devastating Second World War.<ref>de Bles, Boven and Homburg (2006), p. 95.</ref> Besides Royal Netherlands Navy, Dutch naval experts at the time also stressed in numerous articles how important nuclear submarines were and that there would not be such a big technological leap forward again in at least a decade.<ref>F.B. Hamilton, "De ontwikkeling van het Onderzeeboot-wapen" in: Militaire Spectator - Wetenschappelijke jaarberichten 132 (1963) p.37.</ref> These kind of statements and recommendations also encouraged the Royal Netherlands Navy to start thinking about acquiring nuclear submarines. In the meanwhile the keel laying of the two submarines that the Dutch navy had ordered took place on 14 July 1966. {{HNLMS|Zwaardvis|S806|2}} was assigned building number 320, while {{HNLMS|Tijgerhaai|S807|2}} was assigned building number 321. The two names were awarded by Queen Juliana of the Netherlands, on 7 September.<ref name="archiefzwaardvis"/> | ||
[[File:Bediening van de periscoop a-b van de onderzeeboot Hr.Ms. Zwaardvis (S806, 1972-1994) (2097 039 077026).jpg|thumb|left|Operation of the periscope inside of the operations compartment aboard the ''Zwaardvis''.]] | [[File:Bediening van de periscoop a-b van de onderzeeboot Hr.Ms. Zwaardvis (S806, 1972-1994) (2097 039 077026).jpg|thumb|left|Operation of the periscope inside of the operations compartment aboard the ''Zwaardvis''.]] | ||
The United States was not eager about the idea of the Netherlands building nuclear submarines, they rather had the Dutch navy focus on other areas within the NATO alliance, the negotiations therefore stopped in 1969.<ref>Schoonoord, p.151</ref> Paradoxically NATO did support the Dutch nuclear desire, but added that if the Dutch navy did not succeed in the short term, then two conventional submarines would have to be built.<ref name="marineschepenzwaardvis"/> This is exactly what happened eventually with the ''Zwaardvis''-class submarines being conventional diesel-electric submarines, with their hulls and general arrangement being based on the [[Engineering:Teardrop hull|teardrop design]] of the last non-nuclear American submarine class, the {{sclass|Barbel|submarine|4}}. | The United States was not eager about the idea of the Netherlands building nuclear submarines, they rather had the Dutch navy focus on other areas within the NATO alliance, the negotiations therefore stopped in 1969.<ref>Schoonoord (2012), p. 151.</ref> Paradoxically NATO did support the Dutch nuclear desire, but added that if the Dutch navy did not succeed in the short term, then two conventional submarines would have to be built.<ref name="marineschepenzwaardvis"/> This is exactly what happened eventually with the ''Zwaardvis''-class submarines being conventional diesel-electric submarines, with their hulls and general arrangement being based on the [[Engineering:Teardrop hull|teardrop design]] of the last non-nuclear American submarine class, the {{sclass|Barbel|submarine|4}}. | ||
==Design== | ==Design== | ||
[[File:Zwaardvis-class submarines.jpg|thumb|left|HNLMS ''Zwaardvis'' (at front) and HNLMS ''Tijgerhaai'', the two ''Zwaardvis''-class submarines in Dutch service.]] | [[File:Zwaardvis-class submarines.jpg|thumb|left|HNLMS ''Zwaardvis'' (at front) and HNLMS ''Tijgerhaai'', the two ''Zwaardvis''-class submarines in Dutch service.]] | ||
[[File:Opslag torpedo's a-b van de onderzeeboot Hr.Ms. Zwaardvis (1972-1994). Boegbuiskamer (2097 039 077033).jpg|thumb|right|Torpedo storage aboard the ''Zwaardvis''; bow torpedo storage room.]] | [[File:Opslag torpedo's a-b van de onderzeeboot Hr.Ms. Zwaardvis (1972-1994). Boegbuiskamer (2097 039 077033).jpg|thumb|right|Torpedo storage aboard the ''Zwaardvis''; bow torpedo storage room.]] | ||
The ''Zwaardvis''-class submarines were designed by the Royal Netherlands Navy and further worked out by the four biggest Dutch yards at the time, namely RDM, Wilton-Fijenoord, De Schelde and NDSM, and also by Werkspoor N.V. and N.V. Nederlandsche Vereenigde Scheepsbouw Bureaux.<ref name="RDMzwaardvisopdracht">{{citation|title=Opdracht voor twee onderzeeboten|url=https://www.rdm-archief.nl/RDM-PB/PB-1966-02.pdf|pages=4–5|publisher=bedrijfsblad "Nieuws van de RDM"|date=February 1966|access-date=25 April 2018}}</ref> In comparison to the three-cylinder design of the ''Dolfijn''-class submarines, the ''Zwaardvis''-class submarines are based on one cylinder. The reasons why the Royal Netherlands Navy and its partners choose for this design was because it resulted in more space within the submarines, which would give the crew a more spacious accommodation and make it also easier to set up machines within the submarines.<ref name="RDMzwaardvisopdracht"/> | The ''Zwaardvis''-class submarines were designed by the Royal Netherlands Navy and further worked out by the four biggest Dutch yards at the time, namely RDM, Wilton-Fijenoord, De Schelde and NDSM, and also by Werkspoor N.V. and N.V. Nederlandsche Vereenigde Scheepsbouw Bureaux.<ref name="RDMzwaardvisopdracht">{{citation|title=Opdracht voor twee onderzeeboten|url=https://www.rdm-archief.nl/RDM-PB/PB-1966-02.pdf|pages=4–5|publisher=bedrijfsblad "Nieuws van de RDM"|date=February 1966|access-date=25 April 2018}}</ref> In comparison to the three-cylinder design of the ''Dolfijn''-class submarines, the ''Zwaardvis''-class submarines are based on one cylinder. The reasons why the Royal Netherlands Navy and its partners choose for this design was because it resulted in more space within the submarines, which would give the crew a more spacious accommodation and make it also easier to set up machines within the submarines.<ref name="RDMzwaardvisopdracht"/> The hydraulic system of the boats included three pumps and three accumulators.<ref name="SFKVO2006">{{cite magazine |last=Speek |first=Frans |date=June 2006 |title=Uitspraak van de Nederlandse Marineraad (deel 3) |url=https://www.klaarvooronderwater.nl/kvo/Kvo-096.pdf |magazine=Klaar Voor Onderwater |location=Den Helder |publisher=Onderzeedienst Reünistenvereniging |issue=96|volume=29 |pages=8-12 |language=Dutch}}</ref> They were equipped with controls sliders made by Rexroth.<ref name="SFKVO2006" /> | ||
In addition, the submarines are based on the U.S. Navy {{sclass|Barbel|submarine|4}} with the teardrop hull design, which results in the submarines producing less noise.<ref name="GSzwaardvis">{{citation|title=Zwaardvis|url=https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/europe/zwaardvis.htm|publisher=Global Security|access-date=23 April 2018}}</ref> The propulsion of the ''Zwaardvis'' class is also different from the ''Dolfijn''-class submarines, for example, it has a single [[Engineering:Propeller|propeller]] instead of the two propellers the latter has. Furthermore, it has more diesel engines, the batteries require less charging time, it can launch missiles and [[Engineering:Torpedo|torpedo]]es from greater depths, the diving depth has increased substantially, and lastly it can stay longer submerged.<ref name="RDMzwaardvisgestalte">{{citation|title=Onderzeeboten "Zwaardvis" en "Tijgerhaai" krijgen gestalte|url=https://www.rdm-archief.nl/RDM-PB/PB-1968-11.pdf|pages=8–9|publisher=bedrijfsblad "Nieuws van de RDM"|date=November 1968|access-date=25 April 2018}}</ref> The introduction of the ''Zwaardvis''-class submarines also led to the Royal Netherlands Navy using the Mark 37 torpedoes. In 1988 the Mark 37 torpedoes for the ''Zwaardvis''-class submarines were replaced with the newer Mark 48 torpedoes.<ref>de Bles, Boven and Homburg, | In addition, the submarines are based on the U.S. Navy {{sclass|Barbel|submarine|4}} with the teardrop hull design, which results in the submarines producing less noise.<ref name="GSzwaardvis">{{citation|title=Zwaardvis|url=https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/europe/zwaardvis.htm|publisher=Global Security|access-date=23 April 2018}}</ref> The propulsion of the ''Zwaardvis'' class is also different from the ''Dolfijn''-class submarines, for example, it has a single [[Engineering:Propeller|propeller]] instead of the two propellers the latter has. Furthermore, it has more diesel engines, the batteries require less charging time, it can launch missiles and [[Engineering:Torpedo|torpedo]]es from greater depths, the diving depth has increased substantially, and lastly it can stay longer submerged.<ref name="RDMzwaardvisgestalte">{{citation|title=Onderzeeboten "Zwaardvis" en "Tijgerhaai" krijgen gestalte|url=https://www.rdm-archief.nl/RDM-PB/PB-1968-11.pdf|pages=8–9|publisher=bedrijfsblad "Nieuws van de RDM"|date=November 1968|access-date=25 April 2018}}</ref> The introduction of the ''Zwaardvis''-class submarines also led to the Royal Netherlands Navy using the Mark 37 torpedoes. In 1988 the Mark 37 torpedoes for the ''Zwaardvis''-class submarines were replaced with the newer Mark 48 torpedoes.<ref>de Bles, Boven and Homburg (2006), p. 104.</ref> | ||
==Export== | ==Export== | ||
===Taiwan=== | |||
{{Main|Engineering:Hai Lung-class submarine}} | {{Main|Engineering:Hai Lung-class submarine}} | ||
In September 1981 the Republic of China (Taiwan) ordered two modified ''Zwaardvis''-class submarines, the [[Engineering:Hai Lung-class submarine|''Chien Lung/Hai Lung'' class]].<ref name="GBhailung">{{citation|title =Hai Lung [Sea Dragon]-class [Zwaardvis] Submarine|url=https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/taiwan/hai-lung.htm|publisher=Global Security|access-date=24 April 2018}}</ref> In 1992 a repeat order for another four boats was turned down by the Netherlands government because of pressure from the People's Republic of China.<ref name="TWhailung">{{citation|title =Den Haag boort RDM orders door de neus|url=https://www.trouw.nl/home/-den-haag-boort-rdm-orders-door-de-neus-~ad32cb6e/|language=nl|author=Jelle Brandsma|publisher=Trouw|date=1 September 2004|access-date=24 April 2018}}</ref> | In September 1981 the Republic of China (Taiwan) ordered two modified ''Zwaardvis''-class submarines, the [[Engineering:Hai Lung-class submarine|''Chien Lung/Hai Lung'' class]].<ref name="GBhailung">{{citation|title =Hai Lung [Sea Dragon]-class [Zwaardvis] Submarine|url=https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/taiwan/hai-lung.htm|publisher=Global Security|access-date=24 April 2018}}</ref> In 1992 a repeat order for another four boats was turned down by the Netherlands government because of pressure from the People's Republic of China.<ref name="TWhailung">{{citation|title =Den Haag boort RDM orders door de neus|url=https://www.trouw.nl/home/-den-haag-boort-rdm-orders-door-de-neus-~ad32cb6e/|language=nl|author=Jelle Brandsma|publisher=Trouw|date=1 September 2004|access-date=24 April 2018}}</ref> | ||
The two decommissioned Dutch boats, {{HNLMS|Zwaardvis|S806|2}} and {{HNLMS|Tijgerhaai|S807|2}}, were loaded onto a ship and transported to PSC-Naval Dockyard, Lumut, Malaysia in anticipation of purchase by the Malaysian Navy | ===Malaysia=== | ||
The two decommissioned Dutch boats, {{HNLMS|Zwaardvis|S806|2}} and {{HNLMS|Tijgerhaai|S807|2}}, were sold in 1995 to RDM, which was planning to try to sell them to a new customer.<ref>{{cite magazine |last= |first= |date=September 2005 |title=Kort geding RDM om onderzeeërs |url=https://www.klaarvooronderwater.nl/kvo/Kvo-093.pdf |magazine=Klaar Voor Onderwater |location=Den Helder |publisher=Onderzeedienst Reünistenvereniging |issue=93|volume=28 |page=16 |language=Dutch}}</ref> In 1997 they were loaded onto a ship and transported to PSC-Naval Dockyard, Lumut, Malaysia in anticipation of purchase by the Malaysian Navy.<ref>{{citation|title =RDM verplicht tot sloop duikboten|url=http://rechtennieuws.nl/4051/rdm-verplicht-tot-sloop-duikboten/|language=nl|publisher=Rechten Nieuws|date=18 August 2005|access-date=25 April 2018}}</ref> However, the Malaysian Navy declined the offer and chose the French {{sclass2|Scorpène|submarine|4}} instead. As a result, the two boats stayed for a long time in Lumut awaiting a buyer and possible refurbishment. In 2005 a Dutch judge ordered on 17 Augustus 2005 that Rotterdamsche Droogdok Maatschappij must start with demolishing the two boats before 1 September 2005, or bring the boats back to the Netherlands before 1 October 2005, else they would have to face penalties, such as a payment penalty.<ref>{{citation|title =ECLI:NL:RBSGR:2005:AU1158 |url=https://uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl/inziendocument?id=ECLI:NL:RBSGR:2005:AU1158|language=nl|publisher=Rechtspraak.nl|date=17 August 2005|access-date=25 April 2018}}</ref> Since Rotterdamsche Droogdok Maatschappij went broke, the Dutch Ministry of Defence eventually paid for the demolishing and scrapping of the two submarines. The costs of this were estimated at [[Finance:Euro|€]]2.8 million and the scrap was sold for [[Finance:Euro|€]]1.4 million.<ref>{{citation|title =Staat vordert sloopkosten onderzeeboten op RDM|url=https://www.trouw.nl/home/staat-vordert-sloopkosten-onderzeeboten-op-rdm~a364b1ab/|language=nl|publisher=Trouw|date=8 February 2007|access-date=25 April 2018}}</ref> | |||
==Boats== | ==Boats== | ||
Line 128: | Line 131: | ||
* [[Engineering:List of submarine classes in service|List of submarine classes in service]] | * [[Engineering:List of submarine classes in service|List of submarine classes in service]] | ||
== Citations == | ==Notes== | ||
=== Citations === | |||
{{Reflist}} | {{Reflist}} | ||
== | === Bibliography === | ||
=== Books=== | ==== Books ==== | ||
{{refbegin}} | {{refbegin}} | ||
* Conway's All the World's Fighting Ships 1947–1995 | * {{cite book |editor-last1=Gardiner |editor-first1=Robert |editor-last2=Chumbley |editor-first2=Stephen |editor-last3=Budzbon |editor-first3=Przemysław |date=1995 |title=Conway's All the World's Fighting Ships 1947–1995 |location=Annapolis |publisher=Naval Institute Press |isbn=1-55750-132-7}} | ||
* {{cite book |last1 = de Bles |first1 = Harry |last2 = Boven |first2 = Graddy |last3 = Homburg |first3 = Leon |title = Onderzeeboten! | | * {{cite book |last1=de Bles |first1=Harry |last2=Boven |first2=Graddy |last3=Homburg |first3=Leon |date=2006 |title=Onderzeeboten! |language=Dutch|edition= |location=Zaltbommel |publisher=Aprilis |page= |isbn=978-90-5994-130-4}} | ||
* {{cite book |last1 = Jalhay |first1 = P.C. |last2 = Wijn |first2 = J.J.A. |title = Ik nader ongezien! De onderzeeboten van de Koninklijke Marine |year = 1997 |publisher = De Bataafsche Leeuw |location=Amsterdam |ISBN = 978-9067074629 }} | * {{cite book |last1 = Jalhay |first1 = P.C. |last2 = Wijn |first2 = J.J.A. |title = Ik nader ongezien! De onderzeeboten van de Koninklijke Marine |year = 1997 |publisher = De Bataafsche Leeuw |location=Amsterdam |ISBN = 978-9067074629 }} | ||
* {{cite book | | * {{cite book |last=Schoonoord |first=D.C.L. |date=2012 |title=Pugno pro patria: de Koninklijke Marine tijdens de Koude Oorlog |language=Dutch|edition= |location=Franeker |publisher=Van Wijnen |page= |isbn=978-90-5194-455-6}} | ||
{{refend}} | {{refend}} | ||
===Web sources=== | ==== Web sources ==== | ||
{{refbegin}} | {{refbegin}} | ||
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20130404073930/http://www.dutchsubmarines.com/classes/class_zwaardvis2.htm page from Dutch submarines] | * [https://web.archive.org/web/20130404073930/http://www.dutchsubmarines.com/classes/class_zwaardvis2.htm page from Dutch submarines] | ||
* {{cite web |last1 = van den Enden |first1 = A.H.A.P. |last2=Goedhart |first2=A. |first3=P. |last3=Hamaker |title = Herinneringsboek Hr. Ms. Zwaardvis |publisher = RDM-collectie Johan Journée |url = https://www.rdm-archief.nl/RDM-NB/320-Herinneringsboek.pdf }} | * {{cite web |last1 = van den Enden |first1 = A.H.A.P. |last2 = Goedhart |first2 = A. |first3 = P. |last3 = Hamaker |title = Herinneringsboek Hr. Ms. Zwaardvis |publisher = RDM-collectie Johan Journée |url = https://www.rdm-archief.nl/RDM-NB/320-Herinneringsboek.pdf }} | ||
* {{cite web |url = https://marineschepen.nl/schepen/zwaardvis-1972.html |title = Zwaardvisklasse onderzeeboten |last=Karremann |first=Jaime |language= nl |website=marineschepen.nl |date=June 29, 2017 |access-date=April 23, 2018 }} | * {{cite web |url=https://marineschepen.nl/schepen/zwaardvis-1972.html |title=Zwaardvisklasse onderzeeboten |last=Karremann |first=Jaime |language=nl |website=marineschepen.nl |date=June 29, 2017 |access-date=April 23, 2018 }} | ||
* {{cite web |url = https://marineschepen.nl/dossiers/Hoe-Nederland-belangrijke-onderzeebootbouw-kennis-verloor.html |title=Zwaardvisklasse niet vervangen: hoe Nederland belangrijke onderzeebootbouwkennis verloor |last=Karremann |first=Jaime |language = nl |website = marineschepen.nl |date=February 16, 2016 |access-date=April 23, 2018 }} | * {{cite web |url=https://marineschepen.nl/dossiers/Hoe-Nederland-belangrijke-onderzeebootbouw-kennis-verloor.html |title=Zwaardvisklasse niet vervangen: hoe Nederland belangrijke onderzeebootbouwkennis verloor |last=Karremann |first=Jaime |language=nl |website=marineschepen.nl |date=February 16, 2016 |access-date=April 23, 2018 }} | ||
* {{cite | {{refend}} | ||
==Further reading== | |||
{{refbegin}} | |||
* {{cite book |last=van Amstel |first=W.H.E. |date=1991 |title=De schepen van de Koninklijke Marine vanaf 1945 |language=Dutch|edition= |location=Alkmaar |publisher=De Alk |page= |isbn=90-6013-997-6}} | |||
* {{cite book |last=Grove |first=Eric J. |date=1990 |title=NATO Major Warships: Europe |location=London |publisher=Tri-Service Press |isbn=1-85400-006-3}} | |||
* {{cite book |last=Jalhay |first=P.C. |date=1982 |title=Nederlandse Onderzeedienst 75 jaar |language=Dutch |edition= |location=Bussum |publisher=De Boer Maritiem |page= |isbn=90-228-1864-0}} | |||
* {{cite book |last=Nooteboom |first=S.G. |date=2001 |title=Deugdelijke schepen: marinescheepsbouw 1945-1995 |language=Dutch|edition= |url= |location=Zaltbommel |publisher=Europese Bibliotheek |page= |isbn=90-288-2637-8}} | |||
* {{cite book |editor-last=Raven |editor-first=G.J.A. |date=1988 |title=De kroon op het anker: 175 jaar Koninklijke Marine |language=Dutch|edition= |location=Amsterdam |publisher=De Bataafsche Leeuw |page= |isbn=90-6707-200-1}} | |||
* {{cite magazine |last=van den Pol |first=Ed |url=https://www.klaarvooronderwater.nl/kvo/Kvo-083.pdf|date=March 2003 |title= Mijmeringen van een oude oud-ozbt HTD resp. SOMAT. - Deel 3(slot)|magazine=Klaar Voor Onderwater |volume=26|issue=83|location=Den Helder |publisher=Onderzeedienst Reünistenvereniging |pages=4-7 |language=Dutch}} | |||
* {{cite book |editor-last=Sharpe |editor-first=Richard |date=1989 |title= Jane's Fighting Ships 1989-90 | location=Coulsdon, Surrey |publisher= Janes Information Group |isbn=0-7106-0886-1}} | |||
{{refend}} | {{refend}} | ||
{{ | {{Clear}} | ||
{{Zwaardvis class submarine}} | |||
{{Modern Dutch submarines}} | |||
{{Post1945DutchShips}} | |||
[[Category:Submarine classes]] | [[Category:Submarine classes]] | ||
{{Sourceattribution|Zwaardvis-class submarine}} | {{Sourceattribution|Zwaardvis-class submarine}} |
Latest revision as of 21:00, 13 July 2025
File:300px Zwaardvis, lead submarine and namesake ship of her class
| |
Class overview | |
---|---|
Name: | Zwaardvis class |
Builders: |
|
Operators: | |
Preceded by: | Walrus class |
Succeeded by: |
|
Subclasses: | Hai Lung class |
Built: | 1966–1988 |
In commission: | 1972–present |
Planned: | 4 |
Completed: | 4 |
Active: | 2 |
Retired: | 2 |
General characteristics | |
Type: | Diesel-electric attack submarine |
Displacement: |
|
Length: | 66.9 m (219 ft 6 in) |
Beam: | 8.4 m (27 ft 7 in) |
Draught: |
|
Propulsion: |
|
Speed: |
|
Range: | 10,000 nmi (20,000 km) at 9 knots (10 mph; 17 km/h) |
Test depth: |
|
Complement: | 67 (including 8 officers) |
Sensors and processing systems: |
|
Armament: |
|
The Zwaardvis-class submarine ("Swordfish") is a class of conventional attack submarines that were built to strengthen the Royal Netherlands Navy. The Dutch government opted for the choice to not replace the two Zwaardvis-class submarines with either more Walrus-class submarines, or submarines of a new design.[1][2]
History
On 24 December 1965 the Royal Netherlands Navy gave Rotterdamsche Droogdok Maatschappij the order to build two submarines.[3] At the time of this order the Royal Netherlands Navy believed that these two submarines could possibly make use of nuclear propulsion. Like many other navies around the world the Netherlands got interested in nuclear propulsion after the United States had put USS Nautilus into active service in 1955. The performance of this and succeeding nuclear submarine, such as the Skate-class submarines, were very promising at the time.[4] It made the Dutch navy believe that nuclear submarines would play a crucial role in the future and not developing one would mean to be left behind by other navies who were focusing on nuclear submarines.[5]
In addition, the Royal Netherlands Navy was afraid that the diesel-electric Dolfijn-class submarines which had just entered service were no match for nuclear submarines. This would be problematic since the Dolfijn-class submarines were the most modern submarines the Dutch navy had at the time in their inventory. Furthermore, it was also a blow to the Dutch navy because their submarine fleet were just getting into the shape the navy had envisioned after the devastating Second World War.[6] Besides Royal Netherlands Navy, Dutch naval experts at the time also stressed in numerous articles how important nuclear submarines were and that there would not be such a big technological leap forward again in at least a decade.[7] These kind of statements and recommendations also encouraged the Royal Netherlands Navy to start thinking about acquiring nuclear submarines. In the meanwhile the keel laying of the two submarines that the Dutch navy had ordered took place on 14 July 1966. Zwaardvis was assigned building number 320, while Tijgerhaai was assigned building number 321. The two names were awarded by Queen Juliana of the Netherlands, on 7 September.[3]
The United States was not eager about the idea of the Netherlands building nuclear submarines, they rather had the Dutch navy focus on other areas within the NATO alliance, the negotiations therefore stopped in 1969.[8] Paradoxically NATO did support the Dutch nuclear desire, but added that if the Dutch navy did not succeed in the short term, then two conventional submarines would have to be built.[5] This is exactly what happened eventually with the Zwaardvis-class submarines being conventional diesel-electric submarines, with their hulls and general arrangement being based on the teardrop design of the last non-nuclear American submarine class, the Barbel class.
Design
The Zwaardvis-class submarines were designed by the Royal Netherlands Navy and further worked out by the four biggest Dutch yards at the time, namely RDM, Wilton-Fijenoord, De Schelde and NDSM, and also by Werkspoor N.V. and N.V. Nederlandsche Vereenigde Scheepsbouw Bureaux.[9] In comparison to the three-cylinder design of the Dolfijn-class submarines, the Zwaardvis-class submarines are based on one cylinder. The reasons why the Royal Netherlands Navy and its partners choose for this design was because it resulted in more space within the submarines, which would give the crew a more spacious accommodation and make it also easier to set up machines within the submarines.[9] The hydraulic system of the boats included three pumps and three accumulators.[10] They were equipped with controls sliders made by Rexroth.[10]
In addition, the submarines are based on the U.S. Navy Barbel class with the teardrop hull design, which results in the submarines producing less noise.[11] The propulsion of the Zwaardvis class is also different from the Dolfijn-class submarines, for example, it has a single propeller instead of the two propellers the latter has. Furthermore, it has more diesel engines, the batteries require less charging time, it can launch missiles and torpedoes from greater depths, the diving depth has increased substantially, and lastly it can stay longer submerged.[12] The introduction of the Zwaardvis-class submarines also led to the Royal Netherlands Navy using the Mark 37 torpedoes. In 1988 the Mark 37 torpedoes for the Zwaardvis-class submarines were replaced with the newer Mark 48 torpedoes.[13]
Export
Taiwan
In September 1981 the Republic of China (Taiwan) ordered two modified Zwaardvis-class submarines, the Chien Lung/Hai Lung class.[14] In 1992 a repeat order for another four boats was turned down by the Netherlands government because of pressure from the People's Republic of China.[15]
Malaysia
The two decommissioned Dutch boats, Zwaardvis and Tijgerhaai, were sold in 1995 to RDM, which was planning to try to sell them to a new customer.[16] In 1997 they were loaded onto a ship and transported to PSC-Naval Dockyard, Lumut, Malaysia in anticipation of purchase by the Malaysian Navy.[17] However, the Malaysian Navy declined the offer and chose the French Scorpène class instead. As a result, the two boats stayed for a long time in Lumut awaiting a buyer and possible refurbishment. In 2005 a Dutch judge ordered on 17 Augustus 2005 that Rotterdamsche Droogdok Maatschappij must start with demolishing the two boats before 1 September 2005, or bring the boats back to the Netherlands before 1 October 2005, else they would have to face penalties, such as a payment penalty.[18] Since Rotterdamsche Droogdok Maatschappij went broke, the Dutch Ministry of Defence eventually paid for the demolishing and scrapping of the two submarines. The costs of this were estimated at €2.8 million and the scrap was sold for €1.4 million.[19]
Boats
Ship | Builder | Laid down | Launched | Commissioned | Decommissioned | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Zwaardvis | Rotterdamsche Droogdok Maatschappij | 14 July 1966 | 2 July 1970 | 18 August 1972 | 1994 | |
Tijgerhaai | Rotterdamsche Droogdok Maatschappij | 14 July 1966 | 25 May 1971 | 20 October 1972 | 1995 | |
Hai Lung class | ||||||
Hai Lung | Wilton-Fijenoord | 15 December 1982 | 6 October 1986 | 9 October 1987 | In service | |
Hai Hu | Wilton-Fijenoord | December 1982 | 20 December 1986 | 9 April 1988 | In service |
See also
Notes
Citations
- ↑ Karremann, "Zwaardvisklasse niet vervangen: hoe Nederland belangrijke onderzeebootbouwkennis verloor".
- ↑ Jaime Karremann (2 October 2015). "Zij ontwerpt de nieuwe onderzeeboten" (in Dutch). https://marineschepen.nl/dossiers/interview-Wendy-van-den-Broek-nieuwe-onderzeeboten.html.
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 A.H.A.P. van den Enden, A. Goedhart en P. Hamaker (in nl), Herinneringsboek Hr. Ms. Zwaardvis, RDM-collectie Johan Journée, p. 4, https://www.rdm-archief.nl/RDM-NB/320-Herinneringsboek.pdf, retrieved 23 April 2018
- ↑ W. Vinke, "De voortstuwing van schepen door middel van kernenergie" in: Militaire Spectator - Wetenschappelijke jaarberichten 127 (1958) p.21-22.
- ↑ 5.0 5.1 Karremann, "Zwaardvisklasse onderzeeboten".
- ↑ de Bles, Boven and Homburg (2006), p. 95.
- ↑ F.B. Hamilton, "De ontwikkeling van het Onderzeeboot-wapen" in: Militaire Spectator - Wetenschappelijke jaarberichten 132 (1963) p.37.
- ↑ Schoonoord (2012), p. 151.
- ↑ 9.0 9.1 Opdracht voor twee onderzeeboten, bedrijfsblad "Nieuws van de RDM", February 1966, pp. 4–5, https://www.rdm-archief.nl/RDM-PB/PB-1966-02.pdf, retrieved 25 April 2018
- ↑ 10.0 10.1 Speek, Frans (June 2006). "Uitspraak van de Nederlandse Marineraad (deel 3)" (in Dutch). Klaar Voor Onderwater (Den Helder: Onderzeedienst Reünistenvereniging) 29 (96): 8-12. https://www.klaarvooronderwater.nl/kvo/Kvo-096.pdf.
- ↑ Zwaardvis, Global Security, https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/europe/zwaardvis.htm, retrieved 23 April 2018
- ↑ Onderzeeboten "Zwaardvis" en "Tijgerhaai" krijgen gestalte, bedrijfsblad "Nieuws van de RDM", November 1968, pp. 8–9, https://www.rdm-archief.nl/RDM-PB/PB-1968-11.pdf, retrieved 25 April 2018
- ↑ de Bles, Boven and Homburg (2006), p. 104.
- ↑ Hai Lung [Sea Dragon-class [Zwaardvis] Submarine], Global Security, https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/taiwan/hai-lung.htm, retrieved 24 April 2018
- ↑ Jelle Brandsma (1 September 2004) (in nl), Den Haag boort RDM orders door de neus, Trouw, https://www.trouw.nl/home/-den-haag-boort-rdm-orders-door-de-neus-~ad32cb6e/, retrieved 24 April 2018
- ↑ "Kort geding RDM om onderzeeërs" (in Dutch). Klaar Voor Onderwater (Den Helder: Onderzeedienst Reünistenvereniging) 28 (93): 16. September 2005. https://www.klaarvooronderwater.nl/kvo/Kvo-093.pdf.
- ↑ (in nl) RDM verplicht tot sloop duikboten, Rechten Nieuws, 18 August 2005, http://rechtennieuws.nl/4051/rdm-verplicht-tot-sloop-duikboten/, retrieved 25 April 2018
- ↑ (in nl) ECLI:NL:RBSGR:2005:AU1158, Rechtspraak.nl, 17 August 2005, https://uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl/inziendocument?id=ECLI:NL:RBSGR:2005:AU1158, retrieved 25 April 2018
- ↑ (in nl) Staat vordert sloopkosten onderzeeboten op RDM, Trouw, 8 February 2007, https://www.trouw.nl/home/staat-vordert-sloopkosten-onderzeeboten-op-rdm~a364b1ab/, retrieved 25 April 2018
Bibliography
Books
- Conway's All the World's Fighting Ships 1947–1995. Annapolis: Naval Institute Press. 1995. ISBN 1-55750-132-7.
- de Bles, Harry; Boven, Graddy; Homburg, Leon (2006) (in Dutch). Onderzeeboten!. Zaltbommel: Aprilis. ISBN 978-90-5994-130-4.
- Jalhay, P.C.; Wijn, J.J.A. (1997). Ik nader ongezien! De onderzeeboten van de Koninklijke Marine. Amsterdam: De Bataafsche Leeuw. ISBN 978-9067074629.
- Schoonoord, D.C.L. (2012) (in Dutch). Pugno pro patria: de Koninklijke Marine tijdens de Koude Oorlog. Franeker: Van Wijnen. ISBN 978-90-5194-455-6.
Web sources
- page from Dutch submarines
- van den Enden, A.H.A.P.; Goedhart, A.; Hamaker, P.. "Herinneringsboek Hr. Ms. Zwaardvis". RDM-collectie Johan Journée. https://www.rdm-archief.nl/RDM-NB/320-Herinneringsboek.pdf.
- Karremann, Jaime (June 29, 2017). "Zwaardvisklasse onderzeeboten" (in nl). https://marineschepen.nl/schepen/zwaardvis-1972.html.
- Karremann, Jaime (February 16, 2016). "Zwaardvisklasse niet vervangen: hoe Nederland belangrijke onderzeebootbouwkennis verloor" (in nl). https://marineschepen.nl/dossiers/Hoe-Nederland-belangrijke-onderzeebootbouw-kennis-verloor.html.
Further reading
- van Amstel, W.H.E. (1991) (in Dutch). De schepen van de Koninklijke Marine vanaf 1945. Alkmaar: De Alk. ISBN 90-6013-997-6.
- Grove, Eric J. (1990). NATO Major Warships: Europe. London: Tri-Service Press. ISBN 1-85400-006-3.
- Jalhay, P.C. (1982) (in Dutch). Nederlandse Onderzeedienst 75 jaar. Bussum: De Boer Maritiem. ISBN 90-228-1864-0.
- Nooteboom, S.G. (2001) (in Dutch). Deugdelijke schepen: marinescheepsbouw 1945-1995. Zaltbommel: Europese Bibliotheek. ISBN 90-288-2637-8.
- Raven, G.J.A., ed (1988) (in Dutch). De kroon op het anker: 175 jaar Koninklijke Marine. Amsterdam: De Bataafsche Leeuw. ISBN 90-6707-200-1.
- van den Pol, Ed (March 2003). "Mijmeringen van een oude oud-ozbt HTD resp. SOMAT. - Deel 3(slot)" (in Dutch). Klaar Voor Onderwater (Den Helder: Onderzeedienst Reünistenvereniging) 26 (83): 4-7. https://www.klaarvooronderwater.nl/kvo/Kvo-083.pdf.
- Sharpe, Richard, ed (1989). Jane's Fighting Ships 1989-90. Coulsdon, Surrey: Janes Information Group. ISBN 0-7106-0886-1.
Template:Zwaardvis class submarine Template:Modern Dutch submarines Template:Post1945DutchShips
![]() | Original source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zwaardvis-class submarine.
Read more |