Physics:Insights from the No-Rush Theorem in the Theory of Entropicity(ToE)
The No-Rush Theorem in the Theory of Entropicity
Core Statement and Principle
The "No-Rush Theorem"[1] is one of the foundational principles of the Theory of Entropicity (ToE), first formulated by John Onimisi Obidi[1][2][3][4]. The theorem establishes a fundamental temporal constraint on all physical processes, encapsulated in the principle that "Nature cannot be rushed".[1]
Central Assertion of the No-Rush Theorem:
The No-Rush Theorem establishes a **universal lower bound on interaction durations**, stating that no physical interaction can occur instantaneously[1][5][2]. Every process in nature requires a finite, non-zero time interval to complete, governed by what ToE calls the Entropic Time Limit (ETL)[6][2].
The No-Rush Theorem proposes that:
“In a closed entropic system, time does not advance unless information /energy is redistributed and propagated by entropy.”
Implications of the No-Rush Theorem:
- Time Emergence: Time isn’t a fixed backdrop—it’s emergent from entropy flow. If entropy is static, time effectively “pauses.”
- Causal Reversal: In systems where entropy flows backward (rare but theoretically possible), causality can invert—effects precede causes. It explains Einstein's Relativity in his classical analogy: A man with a beautiful lady finds that time runs and flies by very fast, so that one hour feels like a minute; whereas a man sitting on a hot stove discovers that time runs very slowly, so that one minute feels like an hour (or eternity!).
- Consciousness Link: The theorem supports the idea that subjective time perception is tied to internal entropy shifts. That’s why time seems to fly during chaos and crawl during boredom.
Mathematical Formulation
Basic Mathematical Statement
The fundamental mathematical expression of the No-Rush Theorem is[7]:
[math]\displaystyle{ \Delta_i \geq \Delta_{\min} \quad \forall i }[/math]
where:
- [math]\displaystyle{ \Delta_i }[/math] represents the entropic delay for interaction [math]\displaystyle{ i }[/math]
- [math]\displaystyle{ \Delta_{\min} }[/math] is the fundamental minimum delay time
- The inequality holds for all interactions [math]\displaystyle{ i }[/math]
Entropic Delay Function
The minimum delay is expressed as a function of entropic parameters[7]:
[math]\displaystyle{ \Delta_{\min} = f(\eta, \Lambda_{\min}) }[/math]
where:
- [math]\displaystyle{ \eta }[/math] is the entropic coupling constant
- [math]\displaystyle{ \Lambda_{\min} }[/math] is the minimum entropy density in the region of interaction
Temporal Uncertainty Relation
In applications like the Mpemba Effect, the theorem manifests as[8]:
[math]\displaystyle{ \Delta t_{\min} \propto \frac{1}{\nabla S} }[/math]
This indicates that systems with higher entropy gradients ([math]\displaystyle{ \nabla S }[/math]) experience shorter minimum interaction times, allowing processes to occur more rapidly.
Theoretical Derivation of the No-Rush Theorem
Origin from the Obidi Action =
The No-Rush Theorem arises from the entropic coupling present in the Obidi Action and the requirement of **non-stationary effective action** for times shorter than a single interaction delay[7]. The theorem emerges when considering the stationary phase condition in the path integral formulation.
Connection to the Vuli-Ndlela Integral
Within ToE's reformulation of quantum mechanics through the Vuli-Ndlela Integral[9][10][7], the No-Rush Theorem manifests through the suppression of quantum paths that violate the minimum time constraint:
[math]\displaystyle{ Z_{\mathrm{ToE}} = \int \mathcal{D}[\phi] \exp\left(\frac{i}{\hbar}S[\phi]\right) \exp\left(-\frac{S_G[\phi]}{k_B}\right) \exp\left(-\frac{S_{\mathrm{irr}}[\phi]}{\hbar_{\mathrm{eff}}}\right) }[/math]
The entropic factors [math]\displaystyle{ S_G }[/math] and [math]\displaystyle{ S_{\mathrm{irr}} }[/math] enforce temporal constraints that suppress contributions from paths shorter than [math]\displaystyle{ \Delta_i }[/math][7].
The Cumulative Delay Principle
Extended Mathematical Framework
The No-Rush Theorem extends to sequences of interactions through the Cumulative Delay Principle (CDP)[7]. For [math]\displaystyle{ N }[/math] successive interactions, the total elapsed time satisfies:
[math]\displaystyle{ T_N - T_0 \geq \Delta_{\mathrm{tot}} = \sum_{i=1}^N \Delta_i }[/math]
Since each individual delay satisfies [math]\displaystyle{ \Delta_i \geq \Delta_{\min} }[/math], this yields:
[math]\displaystyle{ T_N - T_0 \geq N \cdot \Delta_{\min} }[/math]
Physical Interpretation
The CDP asserts that **no sequence of interactions can proceed faster than the sum of individual entropic delays**[7]. This principle states that in ToE, **no signal or interaction can propagate so fast or so slow as to constrain the Entropic Field to redistribute energy/information faster or slower than it can possibly execute**[7].
Physical Applications and Implications
Quantum Entanglement Formation
Recent experimental evidence showing that quantum entanglement forms over a finite interval of approximately 232 attoseconds has been cited as potential empirical validation of the No-Rush Theorem[6][11]. This finding supports ToE's assertion that even quantum entanglement—traditionally thought to be instantaneous—requires finite time for completion.
Relativistic Constraints
The theorem provides an entropic explanation for relativistic speed limits[12]:
"The entropic No-Rush Theorem forbids any superluminal interaction by preventing the field from establishing conditions faster than its propagation limit. Likewise, the finite speed of quantum entanglement or wave-function collapse reflects the same entropic time constraint."[12]
Explanation of the Mpemba Effect and Crucial Insights from the Theory of Entropicity (ToE)
The No-Rush Theorem explains why hot water, with higher entropy gradients, can complete phase transitions more rapidly despite starting at a higher temperature. This is the Mpemba Effect.
Thus, in explaining the Mpemba Effect (where hot water can freeze faster than cold water under certain conditions), ToE applies the No-Rush Theorem[8] as follows:
"According to this No-Rush Theorem, no physical interaction occurs instantaneously; all changes require finite entropic delay,"[8] as all interactions require finite time for entropy redistribution and constraint propagation. The Theory of Entropicity (ToE) thus strongly posits that an interaction or event occurs subject to the finite time entropy requires to redistribute the requisite information/energy within the field and propagate the attendant constraints across the field. Hence, entropy not only redistributes the needed information/energy, but also ensures the essential constraints are propagated with the redistribution.
Thus, in the Theory of Entropicity (ToE), a governing law of nature is not given once and for all time, but is developed and generated and then encoded into the field as it propagates. This is a crucial departure from traditional physics, where we often take the laws of nature for granted such that they are given once and for all time. The Theory of Entropicity ToE overthrows such a view with a more dynamic notion of natural laws. That is to say, if entropy has not propagated the requisite law to a given region of interaction or event, then that interaction or event cannot employ or invoke that law in its operation.
Comparison with Established Physics
Distinction from Planck Time
ToE's Entropic Time Limit (ETL) is presented as **"distinct from the Planck time"**[13][14]. While the Planck time ($$ t_P \approx 5.39 \times 10^{-44} $$ seconds) represents a fundamental limit in conventional physics, the ETL is derived from entropic considerations rather than dimensional analysis of fundamental constants.
Relationship to Uncertainty Relations
The No-Rush Theorem introduces what ToE calls a **"Thermodynamic Uncertainty relation"**[1][5], extending conventional quantum uncertainty principles to include entropy-time constraints. This represents a novel addition to the standard framework of quantum mechanics.
Theoretical Significance of ToE's No-Rush Theorem
Temporal Structure of Reality
The No-Rush Theorem fundamentally challenges the conventional understanding of time in physics. Rather than treating time as a continuous parameter allowing arbitrarily small intervals, ToE proposes that time has an intrinsic granular structure governed by entropy redistribution and constraints propagation.[2][7]
Non-Markovian Memory Effects
The No-Rush Theorem also introduces "non-Markovian memory" into physical processes.[7][8] Because each interaction "remembers" its individual delay (as a result of the entropic information/energy redistribution and propagation of the physical law carried from the past - for such an entropic phenomenon is what actually creates and constitutes memory) before allowing the next step, system dynamics acquire temporal correlations that make evolution intrinsically non-Markovian. This entropic causation and manifestation of memory indeed has great implications for Artificial Intelligence (AI), neurology, neuroscience, and medicine in general.
Signal Propagation Limits
The theorem imposes constraints on signal propagation through media with multiple scattering sites[7]:
"Electromagnetic or gravitational signals traversing a medium with multiple scattering sites (e.g., early-universe plasma, interstellar gas) accumulate entropic delays. This may imprint subtle frequency-dependent phase shifts in observations such as the cosmic microwave background or gravitational-wave echoes."[7]
Critical Assessment of ToE's No-Rush Theorem
Empirical Support
While the 232-attosecond entanglement formation time has been cited as supporting evidence[6][11], the connection between this experimental result and ToE's specific predictions requires more rigorous validation. The interpretation of this timescale as fundamental rather than measurement-limited remains to be established.
Mathematical Rigor
The theorem's mathematical foundation relies on the Obidi Action and Vuli-Ndlela Integral, which themselves require more comprehensive peer review and validation. The precise functional forms of key quantities like $$ f(\eta, \Lambda_{\min}) $$ need more detailed specification.
Relationship to Known Physics
The theorem's relationship to established principles like special relativity, quantum uncertainty relations, and thermodynamic constraints requires clearer delineation and more rigorous comparison.
Conclusion on the Implications of the No-Rush Theorem in ToE
The No-Rush Theorem represents a bold attempt to introduce fundamental temporal constraints into physics based on entropic considerations. While it offers novel insights into the temporal structure of physical processes and provides creative explanations for phenomena like quantum entanglement formation and the Mpemba Effect, the theorem requires more rigorous mathematical formulation and empirical validation.
The theorem's core insight—that entropy might impose fundamental limits on the speed of physical processes—undoubtedly merits scientific investigation, but this should proceed through established channels of peer review and experimental verification. The theorem's ultimate validity will depend on its ability to make specific, testable predictions that distinguish it from conventional physics and withstand experimental scrutiny.
Citations on ToE's No-Rush Theorem:
[1] A Critical Review of the Theory of Entropicity (ToE) on Original ... https://client.prod.orp.cambridge.org/engage/coe/article-details/68630f541a8f9bdab5e1939d
[2] The No-Rush Theorem in Theory of Entropicity (ToE) | Encyclopedia ... https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/58617
[3] The No-Rush Theorem in Theory of Entropicity (ToE) https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/history/show/130672
[4] The No-Rush Theorem in Theory of Entropicity (ToE) https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/history/show/130673
[5] A Critical Review of the Theory of Entropicity (ToE) on Original Contributions, Conceptual Innovations, and Pathways towards Enhanced Mathematical Rigor An Addendum to the Discovery of New Laws of Conservation and Uncertainty[77 https://www.academia.edu/130262557/A_Critical_Review_of_the_Theory_of_Entropicity_ToE_on_Original_Contributions_Conceptual_Innovations_and_Pathways_towards_Enhanced_Mathematical_Rigor_An_Addendum_to_the_Discovery_of_New_Laws_of_Conservation_and_Uncertainty_77
[6] Review and Analysis of the Theory of Entropicity (ToE) in Light https://www.cambridge.org/engage/api-gateway/coe/assets/orp/resource/item/67e999596dde43c908bf7dda/original/review-and-analysis-of-the-theory-of-entropicity-to-e-in-light-of-the-attosecond-entanglement-formation-experiment-toward-a-unified-entropic-framework-for-quantum-measurement-non-instantaneous-wave-function-collapse-and-spacetime-emergence.pdf
[7] Physics:Cumulative Delay Principle (CDP) in the Theory of Entropicity (ToE) https://handwiki.org/wiki/Physics:Cumulative_Delay_Principle_(CDP)_in_the_Theory_of_Entropicity_(ToE)
[8] Physics:Explaining the Mpemba Effect in the Theory of Entropicity ... https://handwiki.org/wiki/Physics:Explaining_the_Mpemba_Effect_in_the_Theory_of_Entropicity_(ToE)
[9] Physics:A Comprehensive Review and Expansion of the Theory of Entropicity https://handwiki.org/wiki/Physics:A_Comprehensive_Review_and_Expansion_of_the_Theory_of_Entropicity
[10] Physics:On the Theory of Entropicity (ToE) https://handwiki.org/wiki/Physics:On_the_Theory_of_Entropicity_(ToE)
[11] Review and Analysis of the Theory of Entropicity (ToE) in Light of the Attosecond Entanglement Formation Experiment: Toward a Unified Entropic Framework for Quantum Measurement, Non-Instantaneous Wave-Function Collapse, and Spacetime Emergence https://www.academia.edu/128521341/Review_and_Analysis_of_the_Theory_of_Entropicity_ToE_in_Light_of_the_Attosecond_Entanglement_Formation_Experiment_Toward_a_Unified_Entropic_Framework_for_Quantum_Measurement_Non_Instantaneous_Wave_Function_Collapse_and_Spacetime_Emergence
[12] Relativistic Time Dilation, Lorentz Contraction: Theory of Entropicity https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/58667
[13] The Entropic Force-Field Hypothesis: A Unified Framework for ... https://www.cambridge.org/engage/coe/article-details/67fec9cb4146e7b3a1415286
[14] The Entropic Force-Field Hypothesis: A Unified Framework for ... https://figshare.com/articles/preprint/The_Entropic_Force-Field_Hypothesis_A_Unified_Framework_for_Quantum_Gravity/28560992
[15] Is entropy actually a good way to define time? : r/PhilosophyofScience https://www.reddit.com/r/PhilosophyofScience/comments/tc5qq2/is_entropy_actually_a_good_way_to_define_time/
[16] John Onimisi Obidi - Independent Researcher - Academia.edu https://independent.academia.edu/JOHNOBIDI
[17] Entropic cascade failure | SGCommand - Stargate Wiki https://stargate.fandom.com/wiki/Entropic_cascade_failure
[18] No Free Lunch Theorems For Optimization - Evolutionary Computation, IEEE Transactions on https://www.cs.ubc.ca/~hutter/earg/papers07/00585893.pdf
[19] "If entropy always increases, how does time-reversal symmetry still ... https://www.reddit.com/r/AskPhysics/comments/1l0jm69/if_entropy_always_increases_how_does_timereversal/
[20] m207.dvi https://www.math.ucdavis.edu/~hunter/m207a/ch1.pdf
[21] QT from Eintropic Inference https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/200c/31015372ab85e78f9132a18e9819755be4f0.pdf
[22] (PDF) Entropic Intersection Hypothesis - Academia.edu https://www.academia.edu/129737089/Entropic_Intersection_Hypothesis
[23] Estimating Entropy Production from Waiting Time Distributions https://math.mit.edu/~dunkel/Papers/2021SkDu_PRL.pdf
[24] A Critical Review of the Theory of Entropicity (ToE) on Original Contributions, Conceptual Innovations, and Pathways towards Enhanced Mathematical Rigor: An Addendum to the Discovery of New Laws of Conservation and Uncertainty https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/A_Critical_Review_of_the_Theory_of_Entropicity_ToE_on_Original_Contributions_Conceptual_Innovations_and_Pathways_towards_Enhanced_Mathematical_Rigor_An_Addendum_to_the_Discovery_of_New_Laws_of_Conservation_and_Uncertainty/29441939
[25] Ify Obidi-Essien's Post - LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/posts/ify-obidi-essien-980341116_masterclass-technology-training-activity-7263238436558434304-SvlP
[26] 1.2: Existence and Uniqueness of Solutions - Mathematics LibreTexts https://math.libretexts.org/Courses/Cosumnes_River_College/Math_420:_Differential_Equations_(Breitenbach)/01:_Introduction/1.02:_Existence_and_Uniqueness_of_Solutions
[27] Exploring the Entropic Force-Field Hypothesis (EFFH): New Insights ... https://www.cambridge.org/engage/coe/article-details/67cfa1b881d2151a02f2f27b
[28] 3.4: Substructures and the Löwenheim-Skolem Theorems https://math.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Mathematical_Logic_and_Proof/Book:_Friendly_Introduction_to_Mathematical_Logic_(Leary_and_Kristiansen)/03:_Completeness_and_Compactness/3.04:_Substructures_and_the_Lowenheim-Skolem_Theorems
[29] Gödel's Incompleteness Theorems https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/goedel-incompleteness/
[30] Entropic Regression DMD (ERDMD) Discovers Informative Sparse ... https://arxiv.org/html/2406.12062
[31] Exploring the Entropic Force-Field Hypothesis_EFFH - New Insights ... https://figshare.com/articles/preprint/Exploring_the_Entropic_Force-Field_Hypothesis_EFFH_-_New_Insights_and_Investigations/28570835
[32] Wittgenstein's Philosophy of Mathematics https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/wittgenstein-mathematics/
[33] Medium Entropy Reduction and Instability in Stochastic Systems ... https://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/23/6/696
[34] arXiv:1602.08163v1 [math.AP] 26 Feb 2016 http://arxiv.org/pdf/1602.08163.pdf
[35] Entropic Regression DMD (ERDMD) Discovers Informative Sparse ... https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.12062
[36] [PDF] Two-Time Measurement of Entropy Transfer in Markovian Quantum ... https://arxiv.org/pdf/2408.12231.pdf
[37] arXiv:1712.08395v3 [math.OC] 16 Apr 2019 https://arxiv.org/pdf/1712.08395.pdf
[38] 1 https://engineering.purdue.edu/~chihw/pub_pdf/ISIT2018_proof.pdf
[39] [PDF] Entropic Fluctuations in Quantum Statistical Mechanics An Introduction https://jaksic.xyz/papers_pdf/Quantum_Entropic_Fluctuations.pdf
[40] How Gödel's Proof Works | Quanta Magazine https://www.quantamagazine.org/how-godels-proof-works-20200714/
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Obidi, John Onimisi. A Critical Review of the Theory of Entropicity (ToE) on Original Contributions, Conceptual Innovations, and Pathways towards Enhanced Mathematical Rigor: An Addendum to the Discovery of New Laws of Conservation and Uncertainty. Cambridge University.(2025-06-30). https://doi.org/10.33774/coe-2025-hmk6n