Active reviews for intermediate designs
From HandWiki
Revision as of 21:11, 10 May 2022 by imported>JOpenQuest (linkage)
 | This article includes a list of references, related reading or external links, but its sources remain unclear because it lacks inline citations. (August 2016) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) |
In software engineering, active reviews for intermediate designs (ARID) is a method to evaluate software architectures, especially on an intermediate level, i.e. for non-finished architectures.[1] It combines aspects from scenario-based design review techniques, such as the architecture tradeoff analysis method (ATAM) and the software architecture analysis method (SAAM), as well as active design reviews (ADR).[2]
See also
References
- ↑ Active reviews of intermediate designs (ARID) - Software Architect's Handbook [Book]
- ↑ Clements, Paul; Kazman, Rick; Klein, Mark (2002). Evaluating Software Architecture: Methods and Case Studies. Boston: Addison Wesley Professional. pp. 241-242. ISBN 0-201-70482-X.
External links
 |  |
