Divisorial scheme

From HandWiki
Revision as of 20:44, 6 March 2023 by TextAI2 (talk | contribs) (add)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

In algebraic geometry, a divisorial scheme is a scheme admitting an ample family of line bundles, as opposed to an ample line bundle. In particular, a quasi-projective variety is a divisorial scheme and the notion is a generalization of "quasi-projective". It was introduced in (Borelli 1963) (in the case of a variety) as well as in (SGA 6 {{{2}}}) (in the case of a scheme). The term "divisorial" refers to the fact that "the topology of these varieties is determined by their positive divisors."[1] The class of divisorial schemes is quite large: it includes affine schemes, separated regular (noetherian) schemes and subschemes of a divisorial scheme (such as projective varieties).

Definition

Here is the definition in SGA 6, which is a more general version of the definition of Borelli. Given a quasi-compact quasi-separated scheme X, a family of invertible sheaves [math]\displaystyle{ L_i, i \in I }[/math] on it is said to be an ample family if the open subsets [math]\displaystyle{ U_f = \{ f \ne 0 \}, f \in \Gamma(X, L_i^{\otimes n}), i \in I, n \ge 1 }[/math] form a base of the (Zariski) topology on X; in other words, there is an open affine cover of X consisting of open sets of such form.[2] A scheme is then said to be divisorial if there exists such an ample family of invertible sheaves.

Properties and counterexample

Since a subscheme of a divisorial scheme is divisorial, "divisorial" is a necessary condition for a scheme to be embedded into a smooth variety (or more generally a separated Noetherian regular scheme). To an extent, it is also a sufficient condition.[3]

A divisorial scheme has the resolution property; i.e., a coherent sheaf is a quotient of a vector bundle.[4] In particular, a scheme that does not have the resolution property is an example of a non-divisorial scheme.

See also

References

  1. Borelli 1963, Introduction
  2. SGA 6, Proposition 2.2.3 and Definition 2.2.4.
  3. Zanchetta 2020
  4. Zanchetta 2020, Just before Remark 2.4.