Biography:Adam Eyre-Walker

From HandWiki
Revision as of 08:51, 7 March 2023 by QCDvac (talk | contribs) (linkage)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Short description: British evolutionary geneticist
Adam Eyre-Walker

Academic background
Alma mater
ThesisStudies of Synonymous Codon Evolution in Mammals
Doctoral advisorWilliam G. Hill
Academic work
DisciplineMolecular evolution
InstitutionsUniversity of Sussex

Adam C. Eyre-Walker, FRS is a British evolutionary geneticist, currently Professor of Biology (Evolution, Behaviour and Environment) in the School of Life Sciences at the University of Sussex. He is noted for making "significant contributions to our understanding of evolution at the molecular level"[1] and pioneering the use of DNA sequence databases for extracting information about the evolution of genomes.[2]

Early life and career

Eyre-Walker took his B.Sc. at the University of Nottingham and Ph.D. at the University of Edinburgh.[3] His doctoral thesis, submitted in 1992, was titled Studies of Synonymous Codon Evolution in Mammals and supervised by William G. Hill.[4] Eyre-Walker joined the University of Sussex in 1997.[2]

Scientific research

His research focuses on molecular and genome evolution, and studies the rate, pattern and effects of genetic mutations through the statistical analysis of DNA sequences and mathematical modeling from an evolutionary perspective.[1][5] According to Eyre-Walker: "One of the central mysteries of evolution is how much of it is due to adaptive evolution at the molecular level. I have devoted much of my career in one way or another to answering this question and those related to it. It seems that adaptive evolution has a major role to play in many species, but we are far from understanding the full picture."[2]

Research on the scientific process

In 2013, with Nina Stoletzki, Eyre-Walker published research arguing that scientists are poor at assessing one another's work: "... scientists have little ability to judge either the intrinsic merit of a paper or its likely impact....the number of citations a paper receives is an extremely error-prone measure of scientific merit.... [and] impact factor is likely to be a poor measure of merit, since it depends on subjective assessment".[6][7] He concluded: "Scientists are probably the best judges of science, but they are pretty bad at it".[8]

Two years later, Eyre-Walker and colleagues Isabelle Cook and Sam Grange researched the optimal size and structure of scientific laboratories. By analyzing data from almost 400 different laboratories, they reported that the bigger the lab, the more productive it is (measured in number of publications, impact factor of the journals in which group members publish papers, and number of citations).[9][10]

Achievements and awards

Eyre-Walker won the 2002 Balfour Prize from the Genetics Society and earned the President's award from the European Society for Evolutionary Biology in 2012. He was elected a Fellow of the Royal Society in 2020.[1][11]

Selected publications

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 "Adam Eyre-Walker: Biography". https://royalsociety.org/people/Adam-Eyre-Walker-25281/. 
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 Vowles, Neil. "DNA database pioneer elected Royal Society Fellow". https://staff.sussex.ac.uk/news/article/51868-dna-database-pioneer-elected-royal-society-fellow. 
  3. "Professor Adam Eyre-Walker". https://profiles.sussex.ac.uk/p34777-adam-eyre-walker. 
  4. Eyre-Walker, Adam. "Studies of Synonymous Codon Evolution in Mammals". University of Edinburgh. https://era.ed.ac.uk/handle/1842/14820. 
  5. John A. Long (22 October 2012). The Dawn of the Deed: The Prehistoric Origins of Sex. University of Chicago Press. p. 137. ISBN 978-0-226-00211-8. https://books.google.com/books?id=h_mMg0qAjgoC. Retrieved 7 June 2022. 
  6. "Blog: Injury Prevention: Impact factor revisited". British Medical Journal. 15 October 2013. https://blogs.bmj.com/injury-prevention/2013/10/15/impact-factor-revisited/. Retrieved 7 June 2022. 
  7. Witkowski, Tomasz; Zatonski, Maciej (2015). Psychology Gone Wrong: The Dark Sides of Science and Therapy. BrownWalker. p. 66. ISBN 9781627345286. https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Psychology_Gone_Wrong/ruaRCgAAQBAJ. Retrieved 7 June 2022. 
  8. "Scientists bad at judging peers' published work". October 2013. http://www.australasianscience.com.au/news/october-2013/scientists-bad-judging-peers%E2%80%99-published-work.html. 
  9. Woolston, Chris (March 2016). "Group dynamics: A lab of their own". Nature 531 (7593): 264–265. doi:10.1038/nj7593-263a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 26966744. https://www.nature.com/articles/nj7593-263a. Retrieved 10 June 2022. 
  10. Cook, Isabelle; Grange, Sam; Eyre-Walker, Adam (9 June 2015). "Research groups: How big should they be?". PeerJ 3: e989. doi:10.7717/peerj.989. PMID 26082872. PMC 4465944. https://peerj.com/articles/989/. Retrieved 10 June 2022. 
  11. Doherty-Cove, Jody (2 May 2020). "University of Sussex professor made a Fellow of the Royal Society". The Argus. https://www.theargus.co.uk/news/18422203.university-sussex-professor-made-fellow-royal-society/. 

External links