Religion:Deuterocanonical books

From HandWiki
Revision as of 17:26, 3 February 2024 by StanislovAI (talk | contribs) (simplify)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Short description: Books of the Bible which are considered non-canonical by Protestant denominations


The deuterocanonical books (from the Greek meaning "belonging to the second canon") are books and passages considered by the Catholic Church, the Eastern Orthodox Church, the Oriental Orthodox Churches, and/or the Assyrian Church of the East to be canonical books of the Old Testament, but which Jews and Protestants regard as apocrypha. They date from 300 BC to 100 AD, before the separation of the Christian church from Judaism.[1][2][3] While the New Testament never directly quotes from or names these books, the apostles quoted the Septuagint, which includes them. Some say there is a correspondence of thought,[4][5] and others see texts from these books being paraphrased, referred, or alluded to many times in the New Testament, depending in large measure on what is counted as a reference.[6]

Although there is no scholarly consensus as to when the Hebrew Bible canon was fixed, some scholars hold that the Hebrew canon was established well before the 1st century AD – even as early as the 4th century BC,[7] or by the Hasmonean dynasty (140–40 BC).[8]

The Septuagint translation of the Hebrew Bible into Greek, which the early Christian church used as its Old Testament, included all of the deuterocanonical books. The term distinguished these books from both the protocanonical books (the books of the Hebrew canon) and the biblical apocrypha (books of Jewish origin that were sometimes read in Christian churches as scripture but which were not regarded as canonical).[9]

According to the disputed Gelasian Decree, the Council of Rome (382 AD) defined a list of books of scripture as canonical. It included most of the deuterocanonical books.[10]

Hebrew Bible canon

The canon of modern Rabbinic Judaism excludes the deuterocanonical books. Albert J. Sundberg writes that Judaism did not exclude from their scriptures the deuterocanonicals and the additional Greek texts listed here.[11]

Protestant Canon

The early Christian church largely relied upon the Septuagint in the canonization of the Christian Bible. In the 16th century, Martin Luther argued that many of the received texts of the New Testament lacked the authority of the Gospels, and therefore proposed removing a number of books from the New Testament, including Hebrews, James, Jude, and the Book of Revelation. While this proposal was not widely accepted among Protestants, the deuterocanonical books—which had previously been deprecated by Jewish scholars—were moved by Luther into an intertestamental section of the Bible called the apocrypha.[12][13]

Lutherans and Anglicans do not consider these books to be canonical but do consider them worthy of reverence. As such, readings from the Protestant apocrypha are found in the lectionaries of these churches.[13][14] Anabaptists use the Luther Bible, which contains the apocrypha as intertestamental books; Amish wedding ceremonies include "the retelling of the marriage of Tobias and Sarah in the Apocrypha".[15]

List of deuterocanonicals

The deuterocanonical texts held as canonical for the Catholic Church and the Eastern Orthodox Church are:[16]

  • Tobit
  • Judith
  • Baruch
  • Sirach (or Ecclesiasticus)
  • 1 Maccabees
  • 2 Maccabees
  • Wisdom
  • Additions to Esther:
    • Fulfillment of Mordecai's Dream (Esther 10:4–13)
    • Interpretation of Mordecai's Dream (Vulgate Esther 11)
    • Conspiracy of the Two Eunuchs (Vulgate Esther 12)
    • Letter of Aman and the Prayer of Mordecai to the Jews (Vulgate Esther 13)
    • The Prayer of Esther (Vulgate Esther 14)
    • Esther Comes into the King's Presence (Vulgate Esther 15)
    • Letter of King Artaxerxes (Vulgate Esther 16)
  • Additions to Daniel:
    • Prayer of Azariah and Song of the Three Holy Children (Septuagint Daniel 3:24–90)
    • Susanna and the Elders (Septuagint prologue, Vulgate Daniel 13)
    • Bel and the Dragon (Septuagint epilogue, Vulgate Daniel 14)
  • Additions to Baruch:
    • Letter of Jeremiah (Baruch chapter 6)

Canonical only for the Eastern Orthodox Church:[16]

Dates of composition

Further information: Dating the Bible

Historical background

Main page: Religion:Development of the Old Testament canon

Deuterocanonical is a term coined in 1566 by the theologian Sixtus of Siena, who had converted to Catholicism from Judaism, to describe scriptural texts considered canonical by the Catholic Church, but which recognition was considered "secondary". For Sixtus, this term included portions of both Old and New Testaments. Sixtus considers the final chapter of the Gospel of Mark to be deuterocanonical. He also applies the term to the Book of Esther from the canon of the Hebrew Bible.[17][18]

The term was then taken up by other writers to apply specifically to those books of the Old Testament which had been recognised as canonical by the Councils of Rome (382 AD), Hippo (393 AD), Carthage (397 AD and 419 AD), Florence (1442 AD) and Trent (1546 AD), but which were not in the Hebrew canon.[17][18][lower-alpha 1]

Forms of the term “deuterocanonical” were adopted after the 16th century by the Eastern Orthodox Church to denote canonical books of the Septuagint not in the Hebrew Bible, a wider selection than that adopted by the Council of Trent, and also by the Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church to apply to works believed to be of Jewish origin translated in the Old Testament of the Ethiopic Bible, a wider selection still.[19]

The acceptance of some of these books among early Christians was widespread, though not universal, and surviving Bibles from the early Church always include, with varying degrees of recognition, books now called deuterocanonical.[20] Some say that their canonicity seems not to have been doubted in the Church until it was challenged by Jews after 100 AD,[21] sometimes postulating a hypothetical Council of Jamnia. Regional councils in the West published official canons that included these books as early as the 4th and 5th centuries.[18][lower-alpha 2]

The Catholic Encyclopedia states:

The official attitude of the Latin Church, always favourable to them, kept the majestic tenor of its way. Two documents of capital importance in the history of the canon constitute the first formal utterance of papal authority on the subject. The first is the so-called "Decretal of Gelasius", the essential part of which is now generally attributed to a synod convoked by Pope Damasus in the year 382. The other is the Canon of Innocent I, sent in 405 to a Gallican bishop in answer to an inquiry. Both contain all the deuterocanonicals, without any distinction, and are identical with the catalogue of Trent. The African Church, always a staunch supporter of the contested books, found itself in entire accord with Rome on this question. Its ancient version, the Vetus Latina, had admitted all the Old Testament Scriptures. St. Augustine seems to theoretically recognize degrees of inspiration; in practice he employs protos and deuteros without any discrimination whatsoever. Moreover in his "De Doctrinâ Christianâ" he enumerates the components of the complete Old Testament. The Synod of Hippo (393) and the three of Carthage (393, 397, and 419), in which, doubtless, Augustine was the leading spirit, found it necessary to deal explicitly with the question of the Canon, and drew up identical lists from which no sacred books are excluded. These councils base their canon on tradition and liturgical usage.[18]

Meanwhile, "the protocanonical books of the Old Testament correspond with those of the Bible of the Hebrews, and the Old Testament as received by Protestants. The deuterocanonical (deuteros, "second") are those whose Scriptural character was contested in some quarters, but which long ago gained a secure footing in the Bible of the Catholic Church, though those of the Old Testament are classed by Protestants as the "Apocrypha". These consist of seven books: Tobias, Judith, Baruch, Ecclesiasticus, Wisdom, First and Second Machabees; also certain additions to Esther and Daniel."[18]

Dead Sea scrolls

The Book of Sirach, whose Hebrew text was already known from the Cairo Geniza, has been found in two of the Dead Sea Scrolls (2QSir or 2Q18, 11QPs_a or 11Q5) in Hebrew. Another Hebrew scroll of Sirach has been found in Masada (MasSir).[22]:597 Five fragments from the Book of Tobit have been found in Qumran written in Aramaic and in one written in Hebrew (papyri 4Q, nos. 196–200).[lower-alpha 3][22]:636 The Letter of Jeremiah (or Baruch chapter 6) has been found in cave 7 (papyrus 7Q2) in Greek.[22]:628

Recent scholars have suggested[23] that the Qumran library of approximately 1,100 manuscripts found in the eleven caves at Qumran[24] was not entirely produced at Qumran, but may have included part of the library of the Jerusalem Temple, that may have been hidden in the caves for safekeeping at the time the Temple was destroyed by Romans in 70 AD.

Influence of the Septuagint

Deuterocanonical and Apocryphal books included in the Septuagint are:

Greek name[25][26] Transliteration English name
Deuterocanonical books
Τωβίτ[lower-alpha 4] Tōbit[lower-alpha 5] Tobit or Tobias
Ἰουδίθ Ioudith Judith
Ἐσθήρ Esthēr Esther with additions
Μακκαβαίων Αʹ 1 Makkabaiōn 1 Maccabees
Μακκαβαίων Βʹ 2 Makkabaiōn 2 Maccabees
Σοφία Σαλoμῶντος Sophia Salomōntos Wisdom or Wisdom of Solomon
Σοφία Ἰησοῦ Σειράχ Sophia Iēsou Seirach Sirach or Ecclesiasticus
Βαρούχ Barouch Baruch
Ἐπιστολὴ Ἰερεμίου Epistolē Ieremiou Letter of Jeremiah
Δανιήλ Daniēl Daniel with additions
Deuterocanonical for the Eastern Orthodox Churches[lower-alpha 6]
Προσευχὴ Μανασσῆ Proseuchē Manassē Prayer of Manasseh
Ἔσδρας Αʹ 1 Esdras 1 Esdras
Μακκαβαίων Γʹ 3 Makkabaiōn 3 Maccabees
Μακκαβαίων Δ' Παράρτημα 4 Makkabaiōn 4 Maccabees
Ψαλμός ΡΝΑʹ Psalmos 151 Psalm 151
Apocrypha
Ψαλμοί Σαλoμῶντος Psalmoi Salomōntos Psalms of Solomon

The large majority of Old Testament references in the New Testament are taken from the Koine Greek Septuagint (LXX), editions of which include the deuterocanonical books, as well as apocrypha – both of which are called collectively anagignoskomena ("Readable, namely worthy of reading").[27][unreliable source?] No two Septuagint codices contain the same apocrypha.[28]

Greek Psalm manuscripts from the fifth century contain three New Testament "psalms": the Magnificat, the Benedictus, the Nunc dimittis from Luke's birth narrative, and the conclusion of the hymn that begins with the "Gloria in Excelsis".[29] Beckwith states that manuscripts of anything like the capacity of Codex Alexandrinus were not used in the first centuries of the Christian era, and believes that the comprehensive codices of the Septuagint, which start appearing in the 4th century AD, are all of Christian origin.[30]

In the New Testament, Hebrews 11:35 is understood by some as referring to an event that was recorded in one of the deuterocanonical books, 2 Maccabees.[31] For instance, the author of Hebrews references oral[citation needed] tradition which spoke of an Old Testament prophet who was sawn in half in Hebrews 11:37, two verses after the 2nd Maccabees reference. Other New Testament authors such as Paul also reference or quote period literature.[32]

Influence of early authors

The Jewish historian Josephus (c. 94 AD) wrote that the Hebrew Bible contained 22 canonical books.[33] The same number of 22 books was reported also by the Christian bishop Athanasius, but they might differ on the exact content (see below for Athanasius), as Josephus did not provide a detailed list.[34]

According to Origen of Alexandria (c. 240 AD), Eusebius described the Hebrew Bible as containing 22 canonical books. Among these books he listed the Epistle of Jeremiah and the Maccabees.

The twenty-two books of the Hebrews are the following: That which is called by us Genesis; Exodus; Leviticus; Numbers; Jesus, the son of Nave (Joshua book); Judges and Ruth in one book; the First and Second of Kings (1 Samuel and 2 Samuel) in one; the Third and Fourth of Kings (1 Kings and 2 Kings) in one; of the Chronicles, the First and Second in one; Esdras (Ezra–Nehemiah) in one; the book of Psalms; the Proverbs of Solomon; Ecclesiastes; the Song of Songs; Isaiah; Jeremiah, with Lamentations and the epistle (of Jeremiah) in one; Daniel; Ezekiel; Job; Esther. And besides these there are the Maccabees.[35]

Eusebius wrote in his Church History (c. 324 AD) that Bishop Melito of Sardis in the 2nd century AD considered the deuterocanonical Wisdom of Solomon as part of the Old Testament and that it was considered canonical by Jews and Christians.[36] On the other hand, the contrary claim has been made: "In the catalogue of Melito, presented by Eusebius, after Proverbs, the word Wisdom occurs, which nearly all commentators have been of opinion is only another name for the same book, and not the name of the book now called 'The Wisdom of Solomon'."[37]

Cyril of Jerusalem (c. 350 AD) in his Catechetical Lectures cites as canonical books "Jeremiah one, including Baruch and Lamentations and the Epistle (of Jeremiah)".[38]

In Athanasius's canonical books list (367 AD) the Book of Baruch and the Letter of Jeremiah are included and Esther is omitted. At the same time, he mentioned that certain other books, including four deuterocanonical books (the Wisdom of Solomon, the Wisdom of Sirach, Judith and Tobit), the book of Esther and also the Didache and The Shepherd of Hermas, while not being part of the Canon, "were appointed by the Fathers to be read". He excluded what he called "apocryphal writings" entirely.[39]

Epiphanius of Salamis (c. 385 AD) mentions that "there are 27 books given the Jews by God, but they are counted as 22, however, like the letters of their Hebrew alphabet, because ten books are doubled and reckoned as five". He wrote in his Panarion that Jews had in their books the deuterocanonical Epistle of Jeremiah and Baruch, both combined with Jeremiah and Lamentations in only one book. While Wisdom of Sirach and the Wisdom of Solomon were books of disputed canonicity.[40]

Augustine (c. 397 AD) writes in his book On Christian Doctrine (Book II Chapter 8) that two books of Maccabees, Tobias, Judith, Wisdom of Solomon and Ecclesiasticus are canonical books.

Now the whole canon of Scripture on which we say this judgment is to be exercised, is contained in the following books: – Five books of Moses, that is, Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, Deuteronomy; one book of Joshua the son of Nun; one of Judges; one short book called Ruth; next, four books of Kings (the two books of Samuel and the two books of Kings), and two of Chronicles, Job, and Tobias, and Esther, and Judith, and the two books of Maccabees, and the two of Ezra [Ezra, Nehemiah]...one book of the Psalms of David; and three books of Solomon, that is to say Proverbs, Song of Songs, and Ecclesiastes... For two books, one called Wisdom and the other Ecclesiasticus... Twelve separate books of the prophets which are connected with one another, and having never been disjoined, are reckoned as one book; the names of these prophets are as follows: Hosea, Joel, Amos, Obadiah, Jonah, Micah, Nahum, Habakkuk, Zephaniah, Haggai, Zechariah, Malachi; then there are the four greater prophets, Isaiah, Jeremiah, Daniel, Ezekiel.[41]

According to the monk Rufinus of Aquileia (c. 400 AD) the deuterocanonical books were not called canonical but ecclesiastical books.[42] In this category Rufinus includes the Wisdom of Solomon, Sirach, Judith, Tobit and two books of Maccabees. Rufinus makes no mention of Baruch[43] or the Epistle of Jeremiah.[42]

Pope Innocent I (405 AD) sent a letter to the bishop of Toulouse citing deuterocanonical books as a part of the Old Testament canon.[44]

Which books really are received in the canon, this brief addition shows. These therefore are the things of which you desired to be informed. Five books of Moses, that is, Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy, and Joshua the son of Nun, and Judges, and the four books of Kings [the two Books of Kings and the two books of Samuel] together with Ruth, sixteen books of the Prophets, five books of Solomon [Proverbs, Ecclesiastes, Song of Songs, Wisdom of Solomon, and Ecclesiasticus],[45] and the Psalms. Also of the historical books, one book of Job, one of Tobit, one of Esther, one of Judith, two of Maccabees, two of Ezra [Ezra, Nehemiah], two of Chronicles.[46]

In the 7th century Latin document the Muratorian fragment, which some scholars[who?] actually believe to be a copy of an earlier 170 AD Greek original, the book of the Wisdom of Solomon is counted by the church.

Moreover, the epistle of Jude and two of the above-mentioned (or, bearing the name of) John are counted (or, used) in the catholic [Church]; and [the book of] Wisdom, written by the friends of Solomon in his honour.[47]

Synods

In later copyings of the canons of the Council of Laodicea (from 364 AD) a canon list became appended to Canon 59, likely before the mid fifth century, which affirmed that Jeremiah, and Baruch, the Lamentations, and the Epistle (of Jeremiah) were canonical, while excluding the other deuterocanonical books.[48][49]

According to Decretum Gelasianum, which is a work written by an anonymous scholar between 519 and 553, the Council of Rome (382 AD) cites a list of books of scripture presented as having been made canonical. This list mentions all the deuterocanonical books except Baruch and the Letter of Jeremiah as a part of the Old Testament canon:

Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, Deuteronomy, Joshua, Judges, Ruth, Kings IV books [1 Samuel, 2 Samuel, 1 Kings, 2 Kings], Chronicles II books, 150 Psalms, three books of Solomon [Proverbs, Ecclesiastes, Song of Songs], Wisdom, Ecclesiasticus, Isaiah, Jeremiah with Cinoth i.e. his lamentations, Ezechiel, Daniel, Hosea, Amos, Micah, Joel, Obadiah, Jonah, Nahum, Habbakuk Zephaniah, Haggai, Zechariah, Malachi, Job, Tobit, Esdras II books [Ezra, Nehemiah], Ester, Judith, Maccabees II books.[10]

The Synod of Hippo (in 393 AD), followed by the Council of Carthage (397) and the Council of Carthage (419), may be the first councils that explicitly accepted the first canon which includes a selection of books that did not appear in the Hebrew Bible;[50] the councils were under significant influence of Augustine of Hippo, who regarded the canon as already closed.[51][52][53]

Canon XXIV from the Synod of Hippo (in 393 AD) records the scriptures which are considered canonical; the Old Testament books as follows:

Genesis; Exodus; Leviticus; Numbers; Deuteronomy; Joshua the Son of Nun; The Judges; Ruth; The Kings, iv. books [1 Samuel, 2 Samuel, 1 Kings, 2 Kings]; The Chronicles, ii. books; Job; The Psalter; The Five books of Solomon [Proverbs, Ecclesiastes, Song of Songs, Wisdom of Solomon, and Ecclesiasticus]; The Twelve Books of the Prophets [Hosea, Joel, Amos, Obadiah, Jonah, Micah, Nahum, Habakkuk, Zephaniah, Haggai, Zechariah, Malachi; Isaiah]; Jeremiah; Ezechiel; Daniel; Tobit; Judith; Esther; Ezra, ii. books [Ezra, Nehemiah]; Maccabees, ii. books.[54]

On 28 August 397, the Council of Carthage confirmed the canon issued at Hippo; the recurrence of the Old Testament part is stated:

Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, Deuteronomy, Joshua the son of Nun, Judges, Ruth, four books of Kings [1 Samuel, 2 Samuel, 1 Kings, 2 Kings], two books of Paraleipomena [1 Chronicles, 2 Chronicles], Job, the Psalter, five books of Solomon [ Proverbs, Ecclesiastes, Song of Songs, Wisdom of Solomon, and Ecclesiasticus ], the books of the twelve prophets, Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezechiel, Daniel, Tobit, Judith, Esther, two books of Esdras [Ezra, Nehemiah], two Books of the Maccabees.[55]

In 419 AD, the Council of Carthage in its canon 24 lists the deuterocanonical books except Baruch and the Epistle of Jeremiah as canonical scripture:

The Canonical Scriptures are as follows: Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, Deuteronomy, Joshua the son of Nun, Judges, Ruth, four books of Kings [1 Samuel, 2 Samuel, 1 Kings, 2 Kings], two books of Chronicles, Job, the Psalter, five books of Solomon [Proverbs, Ecclesiastes, Song of Songs, Wisdom of Solomon, and Ecclesiasticus], the books of the twelve prophets, Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezechiel, Daniel, Tobit, Judith, Esther, two books of Esdras [Ezra, Nehemiah], two Books of the Maccabees.[56]

The Apostolic Canons approved by the Eastern Council in Trullo in 692 AD (not recognized by the Catholic Church) states as venerable and sacred the first three books of Maccabees and Wisdom of Sirach.[57]

The Roman Catholic Council of Florence (1442) promulgated a list of the books of the Bible, including the books of Judith, Esther, Wisdom, Ecclesiasticus, Baruch and two books of the Maccabees as Canonical books:

Five books of Moses, namely Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, Deuteronomy; Joshua, Judges, Ruth, four books of Kings [1 Samuel, 2 Samuel, 1 Kings, 2 Kings], two of Paralipomenon [1 Chronicles, 2 Chronicles], Esdras [Ezra], Nehemiah, Tobit, Judith, Esther, Job, Psalms of David, Proverbs, Ecclesiastes, Song of Songs, Wisdom, Ecclesiasticus, Isaiah, Jeremiah, Baruch, Ezechiel, Daniel; the twelve minor prophets, namely Hosea, Joel, Amos, Obadiah, Jonah, Micah, Nahum, Habakkuk, Zephaniah, Haggai, Zechariah, Malachi; two books of the Maccabees.[58]

The Roman Catholic Council of Trent (1546) adopted an understanding of the canons of these previous councils as corresponding to its own list of deuterocanonical books:

Of the Old Testament, the five books of Moses, namely, Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, Deuteronomy; Josue, Judges, Ruth, the four books of Kings [1 Samuel, 2 Samuel, 1 Kings, 2 Kings], two of Paralipomenon [1 Chronicles, 2 Chronicles], the first and second of Esdras [Ezra, Nehemiah], Tobias, Judith, Esther, Job, the Davidic Psalter of 150 Psalms, Proverbs, Ecclesiastes, the Canticle of Canticles [Song of Songs], Wisdom, Ecclesiasticus, Isaias, Jeremias, with Baruch, Ezechiel, Daniel, the twelve minor Prophets, namely, Osee, Joel, Amos, Abdias, Jonas, Micheas, Nahum, Habacuc, Sophonias, Aggeus, Zacharias, Malachias; two books of Machabees, the first and second.[59]

Influence of Jerome

Jerome in one of his Vulgate prologues describes a canon which excludes the deuterocanonical books. In these prologues, Jerome mentions all of the deuterocanonical and apocryphal works by name as being apocryphal or "not in the canon" except for Prayer of Manasses and Baruch. He mentions Baruch by name in his Prologue to Jeremiah[60] and notes that it is neither read nor held among the Hebrews, but does not explicitly call it apocryphal or "not in the canon". The inferior status to which the deuterocanonical books were relegated by authorities like Jerome is seen by some as being due to a rigid conception of canonicity, one demanding that a book, to be entitled to this supreme dignity, must be received by all, must have the sanction of Jewish antiquity, and must moreover be adapted not only to edification, but also to the "confirmation of the doctrine of the Church".[18]

J. N. D. Kelly states that "Jerome, conscious of the difficulty of arguing with Jews on the basis of books they spurned and anyhow regarding the Hebrew original as authoritative, was adamant that anything not found in it was 'to be classed among the apocrypha', not in the canon; later he grudgingly conceded that the Church read some of these books for edification, but not to support doctrine."[61]

Jerome's Vulgate included the deuterocanonical books as well as apocrypha. Jerome referenced and quoted from some as scripture despite describing them as "not in the canon". Michael Barber asserts that, although Jerome was once suspicious of the apocrypha, he later viewed them as scripture. Barber argues that this is clear from Jerome's epistles; he cites Jerome's letter to Eustochium, in which Jerome quotes Sirach 13:2.[62] Elsewhere Jerome apparently also refers to Baruch, the Story of Susannah and Wisdom as scripture.[63][64][65] Henry Barker states that Jerome quotes the Apocrypha with marked respect, and even as "Scripture", giving them an ecclesiastical if not a canonical position and use.[66] Luther also wrote introductions to the books of the Apocrypha, and occasionally quoted from some to support an argument.[67]

In his prologue to Judith, without using the word canon, Jerome mentioned that Judith was held to be scriptural by the First Council of Nicaea.

Among the Hebrews the Book of Judith is found among the Hagiographa. ...But because this book is found by the Nicene Council to have been counted among the number of the Sacred Scriptures, I have acquiesced to your request.[68]

In his reply to Rufinus, Jerome affirmed that he was consistent with the choice of the church regarding which version of the deuterocanonical portions of Daniel to use, which the Jews of his day did not include:

What sin have I committed in following the judgment of the churches? But when I repeat what the Jews say against the Story of Susanna and the Hymn of the Three Children, and the fables of Bel and the Dragon, which are not contained in the Hebrew Bible, the man who makes this a charge against me proves himself to be a fool and a slanderer; for I explained not what I thought but what they commonly say against us. (Against Rufinus, II:33 [402 AD])[69]

Thus Jerome acknowledged the principle by which the canon would be settled—the judgment of the Church (at least the local churches in this case) rather than his own judgment or the judgment of Jews; though concerning translation of Daniel to Greek, he wondered why one should use the version of a translator whom he regarded as a heretic and judaizer (Theodotion).[69]

The Vulgate is also important as the touchstone of the canon concerning which parts of books are canonical. When the Council of Trent confirmed the books included in the first canon, it qualified the books as being "entire with all their parts, as they have been used to be read in the Catholic Church, and as they are contained in the old Latin vulgate edition".[70] This decree was clarified somewhat by Pope Pius XI on 2 June 1927, who allowed that the Comma Johanneum was open to dispute.[71]

The Council of Trent also ratified the Vulgate Bible as the official Latin version of the Bible for the Roman Catholic Church.[72]

Deuterocanonical and Apocryphal books included in the Latin Vulgate are:[73]

Latin name English name
Deuterocanonical Books
Tobiae Tobit or Tobias
Judith Judith
Esther Esther with additions
Machabaeorum I 1 Maccabees
Machabaeorum II 2 Maccabees
Sapientia Wisdom or Wisdom of Solomon
Ecclesiasticus Sirach or Ecclesiasticus
Baruch Baruch included the Epistle of Jeremiah
Daniel Daniel with additions
Apocryphal Books
3 Esdrae 1 Esdras
4 Esdrae 2 Esdras
Psalmi 151 Psalm 151
Oratio Manasse Prayer of Manasseh
Epistula Ad Laodicenses Epistle to the Laodiceans

Masoretic Text

The existence of the Septuagint, Samaritan Pentateuch, and the Peshitta versions of the Hebrew scriptures demonstrate that different versions of Judaism used different texts, and it is debated which is closest to the Urtext (a theoretical "original" text from which all of these emerged). The Dead Sea Scrolls contain some of the deuterocanonical books, while the Masoretic Text excludes them. Since the Enlightenment, it was wrongly believed that the Masoretic Text was the "original" Hebrew Bible when this was in fact a medieval version created by the Masoretes. The oldest nearly-complete manuscripts of the Old Testament include the Codex Vaticanus (4th century) and the Codex Alexandrinus (5th century), while the oldest complete manuscript of the Masoretic text is the Codex Leningradensis from 1008.[74][75]

The Septuagint was the version of the Hebrew Bible from which the early Christians emerged. The Christian Bible contained these deuterocanonical books until Martin Luther, assuming the Masoretic text to be the original, removed them to match this new Jewish canon. Rabbinic Judaism is a newer form of Judaism that created the Masoretic text in part to deter a Christian reading of the Old Testament.[76][77]

In the Catholic Church

See also: Catholic Bible

The Catholic Church considers that in the Council of Rome in 382 AD, under the Papacy of Damasus I, was defined the complete canon of the Bible, accepting 46 books for the Old Testament, including what the Reformed Churches consider as deuterocanonical books, and 27 books for the New Testament.[78] Based in this first canon, Saint Jerome compiled and translated the 73 books of the Bible into Latin, later known as the Vulgate Bible version, which has been considered during many centuries as one of the official Bible translations of the Catholic Church.[79]

The Synod of Hippo (in 393 AD), followed by the Council of Carthage (397) and the Council of Carthage (419), also explicitly accepted the first canon from the Council of Rome. These councils[50] were under significant influence of Augustine of Hippo, who also regarded the Biblical canon as already closed.[51][52][53] The Roman Catholic Council of Florence (1442) confirmed the first canon too,[58] while the Council of Trent (1546) elevated the first canon to dogma.[79]

Protestant theologian Philip Schaff states that "the Council of Hippo in 393, and the third (according to another reckoning the sixth) Council of Carthage in 397, under the influence of Augustine, who attended both, fixed the catholic canon of the Holy Scriptures, including the Apocrypha of the Old Testament, ...This decision of the transmarine church, however, was subject to ratification; and the concurrence of the Roman See it received when Innocent I and Gelasius I (AD 414) repeated the same index of biblical books."[80]

Schaff says that this canon remained undisturbed till the 16th century, and was sanctioned by the Council of Trent at its fourth session,[80] although as the Catholic Encyclopedia reports, "in the Latin Church, all through the Middle Ages we find evidence of hesitation about the character of the deuterocanonicals. ... Few are found to unequivocally acknowledge their canonicity," but that the countless manuscript copies of the Vulgate produced by these ages, with a slight, probably accidental, exception, uniformly embrace the complete Roman Catholic Old Testament.[18]

Subsequent research qualifies this latter statement, in that a distinct tradition of large format pandect bibles has been identified as having been promoted by the 11th and 12th century reforming Papacy[81] for presentation to monasteries in Italy; and now commonly termed 'Atlantic Bibles' on account of their very great size. While not all these bibles present a consistent reformed Vulgate text, they generally exclude the deuterocanonical books.[81]

Baruch

Baruch and the Letter of Jeremiah, appear in the canon lists of the Council of Laodicea,[48] Athanasius (367 AD),[82] Cyril of Jerusalem (c. 350 AD),[38] and Epiphanius of Salamis (c. 385 AD).[83] They are not present in the canons done by Innocent I and Gelasius I, nor are present in any complete Vulgate Bibles earlier than the 9th century.[84] Even after that date, they do not become common in the Vulgate Old Testament until the 13th century.[85]

In the Old Latin version of the Bible, these two works appear to have been incorporated into the Book of Jeremiah, and Latin Fathers of the 4th century and earlier always cite their texts as being from that book. However, when Jerome translated Jeremiah afresh from the Hebrew text, which is considerably longer than the Greek Septuagint text and with chapters in a different order, he steadfastly refused to incorporate either Baruch or the Letter of Jeremiah from the Greek.[85]

In the 9th century these two works were reintroduced into the Vulgate Bibles produced under the influence of Theodulf of Orleans, originally as additional chapters to the Vulgate book of Jeremiah. Subsequently, and especially in the Paris Bibles of the 13th century, they are found together as a single, combined book after Lamentations.[85]

Esdras

For the Roman Catholic Church and Protestant Churches, Greek Esdras is now considered apocryphal.[86] The Orthodox Church considers it as canonical. The earlier canonical status of this book in the Western church can be less easy to track, as references to Esdras in canon lists and citations may refer either to this book, or to Greek Ezra–Nehemiah, or both together. In the surviving Greek pandect Bibles of the 4th and 5th centuries, Greek Esdras always stands as 'Esdras A' while the Greek translation of the whole of canonical Ezra–Nehemiah stands as 'Esdras B'. The same is found in the surviving witness of the Old Latin Bible.[87]

When Latin fathers of the early church cite quotations from the biblical 'Book of Ezra' it is overwhelmingly 'First Ezra/Esdras A' to which they refer, as in Augustine 'City of God' 18:36. Citations of the 'Nehemiah' sections of Old Latin Second Ezra/'Esdras B' are much rarer. No Old Latin citations from the 'Ezra' sections of Second Ezra/'Esdras B' are known before Bede in the 8th century.[87] Consequently Gallagher and Meade conclude that "when the ancient canon lists, whether Greek or Latin, mention two books of Esdras, they must have in mind the books known in the LXX and Old Latin as Esdras A and Esdras B; i.e. our 1 Esdras and Ezra-Nehemiah."[88]

In his prologue to Ezra Jerome refers to four books of Ezra in the Latin tradition. Jerome's first and second Latin books of Ezra are those of the Old Latin Bible - corresponding to Greek Esdras and Ezra-Nehemiah in the Septuagint. These two books he considers each to be a corrupt version of the single Hebrew book of Ezra, so he claims that his Vulgate version of Ezra from the Hebrew replaces both of them. Jerome condemns the third and fourth Latin books of Ezra as apocrypha. His third book must correspond to the Jewish Apocolypse of Ezra while the fourth book is likely to comprise other material from Latin Ezra.[89][90]

From the 9th century, occasional Latin Vulgate manuscripts are found in which Jerome's single Ezra text is split to form the separate books of Ezra and Nehemiah. In the Paris Bibles of the 13th century this split has become universal, with Esdras A being reintroduced as '3 Esdras' and Latin Esdras being added as '4 Esdras'.[91] At the Council of Trent neither '3 Esdras' nor '4 Esdras' were accepted as canonical books, but were eventually printed in the section of 'Apocrypha' in the Sixto-Clementine Vulgate, along with the Prayer of Manasses.[citation needed]

The Council of Trent in 1546 stated the list of books included in the canon as it had been set out in the Council of Florence.[92] In respect to the deuterocanonical books this list conformed with the canon lists of Western synods of the late 4th century, other than including Baruch with the Letter of Jeremiah (Baruch chapter 6) as a single book.[18][93] While the majority at Trent supported this decision there were participants in the minority who disagreed with accepting any other than the protocanonical books in the canon. Among the minority, at Trent, were Cardinals Seripando and Cajetan, the latter an opponent of Luther at Augsburg.[94][95][96]

In Eastern Orthodoxy

The Eastern Orthodox Churches have traditionally included all the books of the Septuagint in their Old Testaments. The Greeks use the word Anagignoskomena (Ἀναγιγνωσκόμενα, "readable, worthy to be read") to describe the books of the Greek Septuagint that are not present in the Hebrew Bible. When Eastern Orthodox theologians use the term "deuterocanonical", it is important to note that the meaning is not identical to the Roman Catholic usage. In Eastern Orthodox Christianity, deuterocanonical means that a book is part of the corpus of the Old Testament (i.e. is read during the services) but has secondary authority. In other words, deutero (second) applies to authority or witnessing power, whereas in Roman Catholicism, deutero applies to chronology (the fact that these books were confirmed later), not to authority.[97]

The Eastern Orthodox canon includes the deuterocanonical books accepted by Roman Catholics plus Psalm 151, the Prayer of Manasseh, 3 Maccabees and 1 Esdras (also included in the Clementine Vulgate), while Baruch is divided from the Epistle of Jeremiah, making a total of 49 Old Testament books in contrast with the Protestant 39-book canon.[98]

The Eastern Orthodox synod, the Synod of Jerusalem, held in 1672 receive as its canon the books found in the Septuagint, and in the Patristic, Byzantine, and liturgical tradition. The Synod declared the Eastern Orthodox canon as follows:

specifically, "The Wisdom of Solomon," "Judith," "Tobit," "The History of the Dragon" [Bel and the Dragon], "The History of Susanna," "The Maccabees," and "The Wisdom of Sirach." For we judge these also to be with the other genuine Books of Divine Scripture genuine parts of Scripture. For ancient custom, or rather the Catholic Church, which has delivered to us as genuine the Sacred Gospels and the other Books of Scripture, has undoubtedly delivered these also as parts of Scripture, and the denial of these is the rejection of those. And if, perhaps, it seems that not always have all of these been considered on the same level as the others, yet nevertheless these also have been counted and reckoned with the rest of Scripture, both by Synods and by many of the most ancient and eminent Theologians of the Universal Church. All of these we also judge to be Canonical Books, and confess them to be Sacred Scripture.[99]

Other texts printed in Eastern Orthodox Bibles are included as an appendix, which is not the same in all churches; the appendix contains 4 Maccabees in Greek-language bibles, while it contains 2 Esdras in Slavonic-language and Russian-language.[98]

Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church

In the Bible used by the Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church, those books of the Old Testament that are still counted as canonical, but which are not agreed upon by all other Churches, are often set in a separate section titled “deuterocanonical” (ዲዩትሮካኖኒካል). The Ethiopian Orthodox Deuterocanon, in addition to the standard set listed above, and with the books of Esdras and the Prayer of Manasseh, also includes some books that are still held canonical by only the Ethiopian Church, including the Book of Enoch, the Book of Jubilees, and the three books of Meqabyan (which are sometimes wrongly confused with the Books of the Maccabees).[100]

In Christian Churches having their origins in the Reformation

Further information: Religion:Biblical apocrypha
Copies of the Luther Bible include the deuterocanonical books as an intertestamental section between the Old Testament and New Testament; they are termed the "Apocrypha" in Christian Churches having their origins in the Reformation.

Anabaptist Churches

Anabaptists use the Luther Bible, which contains the Apocrypha as intertestamental books, which has much overlap with the Catholic deuterocanonical books; Amish wedding ceremonies include "the retelling of the marriage of Tobias and Sarah in the Apocrypha".[15]

The fathers of Anabaptism, such as Menno Simons, quoted "them [the Apocrypha] with the same authority and nearly the same frequency as books of the Hebrew Bible" and the texts regarding the martyrdoms under Antiochus IV in 1 Maccabees and 2 Maccabees are held in high esteem by the Anabaptists, who faced persecution in their history.[101]

Anglican Communion

The Thirty-nine Articles of Religion of the Church of England lists the deuterocanonical books as suitable to be read for "example of life and instruction of manners, but yet doth not apply them to establish any doctrine".[102] The early lectionaries of the Anglican Church (as included in the Book of Common Prayer of 1662) included the deuterocanonical books amongst the cycle of readings, and passages from them were used regularly in services (such as the Kyrie Pantokrator[103] and the Benedicite).[104]

Readings from the deuterocanonical books are now included in many modern lectionaries in the Anglican Communion, based on the Revised Common Lectionary (in turn based on the post-conciliar Roman Catholic lectionary), though alternative readings from protocanonical books are also provided.[105] There is a great deal of overlap between the Apocrypha section of the original 1611 King James Bible and the Catholic deuterocanon, but the two are distinct.

The Apocrypha section of the original 1611 King James Bible includes, in addition to the deuterocanonical books, the following three books, which were not included in the list of the canonical books by the Council of Trent:[106][107]

  • 1 Esdras (Vulgate 3 Esdras)
  • 2 Esdras (Vulgate 4 Esdras)
  • Prayer of Manasseh

These books make up the Apocrypha section of the Clementine Vulgate: 3 Esdras (a.k.a. 1 Esdras); 4 Esdras (a.k.a. 2 Esdras); and the Prayer of Manasseh, where they are specifically described as "outside of the series of the canon". The 1609 Douai Bible includes them in an appendix, but they have not been included in English Catholic Bibles since the Challoner revision of the Douai Bible in 1750.

Using the word apocrypha (Greek: "hidden away") to describe texts, although not necessarily pejorative, implies that the writings in question should not be included in the canon of the Bible. This classification commingles them with certain non-canonical gospels and New Testament apocrypha. The Society of Biblical Literature recommends the use of the term deuterocanonical books instead of Apocrypha in academic writing.[108]

Lutheran Churches

Luther termed the deuterocanonical books "Apocrypha, that is, books which are not considered equal to the Holy Scriptures, but are useful and good to read."[109] These are included in copies of the Luther Bible as intertestamental books between the Old Testament and New Testament.[109]

Methodist Churches and Moravian Churches

The first Methodist liturgical book, The Sunday Service of the Methodists, employs verses from the biblical apocrypha, such as in the Eucharistic liturgy.[110]

The Revised Common Lectionary, in use by most mainline Protestants including Methodists and Moravians, lists readings from the biblical apocrypha in the liturgical kalendar, although alternate Old Testament scripture lessons are provided.[111]

Presbyterian Churches

The Westminster Confession of Faith, a Calvinist document that serves as a systematic summary of doctrine for the Church of Scotland and other Presbyterian Churches worldwide, recognizes only the sixty-six books of the Protestant canon as authentic scripture. Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Confession reads: "The books commonly called Apocrypha, not being of divine inspiration, are no part of the Canon of Scripture; and therefore are of no authority in the Church of God, nor to be any otherwise approved, or made use of, than other human writings."[112]

Reformed Churches

The Belgic Confession, used in Reformed churches, devotes a section (Article 6) to "the difference between the canonical and apocryphal books" and says of them: "All which the Church may read and take instruction from, so far as they agree with the canonical books; but they are far from having such power and efficacy as that we may from their testimony confirm any point of faith or of the Christian religion; much less to detract from the authority of the other sacred books."[113]

New Testament deuterocanonicals

Main page: Religion:Antilegomena

The term deuterocanonical is sometimes used to describe the canonical antilegomena, those books of the New Testament which, like the deuterocanonicals of the Old Testament, were not universally accepted by the early Church. Jimmy Akin calls these books "New Testament deuterocanonicals".[114] The antilegomena or "disputed writings" were widely read in the Early Church and include:

  • The Epistle to the Hebrews
  • The Epistle of James
  • The Second Epistle of Peter
  • The Second Epistle of John
  • The Third Epistle of John
  • The Epistle of Jude
  • The Book of Revelation
  • The Apocalypse of Peter
  • The Acts of Paul
  • The Shepherd of Hermas
  • The Epistle of Barnabas
  • The Didache

See also

Notes

  1. ↑ Commonly cited include: (1) Melito of Sardis, who went east, to Palestine, and recorded the canon he found being used in the synagogues, as recorded in Eusebius' Church History, 4.26.13–14; (2) Athanasius of Alexandria; (3) Council of Laodicea; (4) Jerome residing in Bethlehem.
  2. ↑ e.g., the Council of Carthage (397), the Council of Rome, the Gelasian decree
  3. ↑ See in "The Dead Sea Scrolls – Browse Manuscripts – Apocrypha". https://www.deadseascrolls.org.il/explore-the-archive/search#q=composition_type_parent_en:'Apocrypha'. 
  4. ↑ Also called Τωβείτ or Τωβίθ in some sources.
  5. ↑ Also called Tōbeit or Tōbith
  6. ↑ The canon of the original Old Greek LXX is disputed. Eastern Orthodox Churches consider some of the following books as deuterocanonical.

References

  1. ↑ Livingstone, E. A. (2013). The Concise Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church. OUP Oxford. pp. 28–29. ISBN 978-0-19-107896-5. https://books.google.com/books?id=AMdQCgAAQBAJ&q=They+date+from+the+period+300+BC%E2%80%93AD+100+approximately%2C+and+mostly+from+200+BC%E2%80%93AD+70%2C+i.e.+before+the+definite+separation+of+the+Church+from+Judaism.&pg=PA29. 
  2. ↑ "Apocrypha". Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co.. https://www.internationalstandardbible.com/A/apocrypha.html. 
  3. ↑ Gleason L., Archer Jr. (1974). A Survey of Old Testament Introduction. Chicago: Moody Press. p. 68. ISBN 9780802484468. https://books.google.com/books?id=-8PYAAAAMAAJ&q=The+Sinaiticus+(Aleph)+omits+Baruch+%22A+Survey+of+Old+Testament+Introduction. 
  4. ↑ Beckwith, Roger T. (2008). The Old Testament Canon of the New Testament Church. Eugene, Oregon: Wipf and Stock Publishers. pp. 382, 383, 387. 
  5. ↑ Mulder, M. J. (1988). Mikra : text, translation, reading, and interpretation of the Hebrew Bible in ancient Judaism and early Christianity. Philadelphia: Van Gorcum. p. 81. ISBN 978-0800606046. https://books.google.com/books?id=6eZ5DwAAQBAJ&q=manuscripts+of+anything+like+the+capacity+of+Codex+Alexandrinus+were+not+used+in+the+first+centuries&pg=PA81. 
  6. ↑ Akin, James (10 January 2012). "Deuterocanonical References in the New Testament". http://jimmyakin.com/deuterocanonical-references-in-the-new-testament. 
  7. ↑ Williams, Jimmy; Anderson, Kerby (2002). Evidence, Answers, and Christian Faith: Probing the Headlines. Kregel Publications. p. 120. ISBN 9780825420351. https://books.google.com/books?id=0VQnZpoq4vgC&q=f.f+bruce+Apocrypha++book+separate+i+section&pg=PA120. 
  8. ↑ Philip R. Davies in The Canon Debate, page 50: "With many other scholars, I conclude that the fixing of a canonical list was almost certainly the achievement of the Hasmonean dynasty."
  9. ↑ Bogaert, Pierre Maurice (2012). "The Latin Bible. c 600 to c. 900". New Cambridge History of the Bible; Vol II. Cambridge University Press. pp. 69–92. 
  10. ↑ 10.0 10.1 "Tertullian: Decretum Gelasianum (English translation)". http://www.tertullian.org/decretum_eng.htm. 
  11. ↑ "Sundberg: Old Testament of the Early Church". https://department.monm.edu/classics/Speel_Festschrift/sundbergJr.htm. 
  12. ↑ Gupta, Nijay K. (2012). "Jesus and Scripture: Studying the New Testament Use of the Old Testament". Religious Studies Review 38 (3): 171. doi:10.1111/j.1748-0922.2012.01624_26.x. 
  13. ↑ 13.0 13.1 Kurian, George Thomas; Lamport, Mark A. (10 November 2016). Encyclopedia of Christianity in the United States. Rowman & Littlefield. p. 264. ISBN 978-1-4422-4432-0. "Luther's Bible included the Apocrypha and Anglicans use Bibles that (typically) include the Apocrypha but it is considered worthy of reverence but not equal in authority to canonical scripture." 
  14. ↑ Readings from the Apocrypha. Forward Movement Publications. 1981. p. 5. 
  15. ↑ 15.0 15.1 Wesner, Erik J. (8 April 2015). "The Bible". Amish America. https://amishamerica.com/bible/#apocrypha. 
  16. ↑ 16.0 16.1 Coogan, Michael D., ed (2018). "The Canons of the Bible". The New Oxford Annotated Bible: New Revised Standard Version: An Ecumenical Study Bible (5th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 1839, 1841. ISBN 978-0-19-027605-8. OCLC 1032375119. 
  17. ↑ 17.0 17.1 "Canon of the Old Testament, II, International Standard Bible Encyclopedia, 1915". http://www.bible-history.com/isbe/C/CANON+OF+THE+OLD+TESTAMENT%2C+II/. 
  18. ↑ 18.0 18.1 18.2 18.3 18.4 18.5 18.6 18.7 This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: Herbermann, Charles, ed (1913). "Canon of the Old Testament". Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton. http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/03267a.htm. 
  19. ↑ Bogaert, Pierre Maurice (2012). New Cambridge History of the Bible. 2. Cambridge University Press. pp. 505–526. 
  20. ↑ J.N. D. Kelly, Early Christian Doctrines, p. 53
  21. ↑ Stuart G. Hall, Doctrine and Practice in the Early Church, p. 28
  22. ↑ 22.0 22.1 22.2 Abegg, Martin; Flint, Peter; Ulrich, Eugene (1999). The Dead Sea Scroll Bible. HarperOne. ISBN 978-0060600648. 
  23. ↑ Lena Cansdale 1997, Qumran and the Essenes pp. 14 ff. cites Rengstorf 1963, Golb 1980, and several others, as well as detractors of this theory.
  24. ↑ Zukeran, Patrick (2011). Unless I See ... Is There Enough Evidence to Believe?. CrossBooks. ISBN 978-1462706204. https://books.google.com/books?id=BWZIHreuvnAC&q=eleven+caves+discovered+1%2C100&pg=PA143. Retrieved 11 March 2016. [yes|permanent dead link|dead link}}]
  25. ↑ Karen H. Jobes and Moises Silva (2001). Invitation to the Septuagint. Paternoster Press. ISBN 1842270613. https://books.google.com/books?id=OysSAQAAIAAJ. 
  26. ↑ Timothy McLay, The Use of the Septuagint in New Testament Research ISBN:0802860915.—The current standard introduction on the NT & LXX.
  27. ↑ Vassiliadis, Petros. "Inspiration, Canon and Authority of Scripture: An Orthodox Hermeneutical Perspective". http://users.auth.gr/~pv/inspiration.htm. 
  28. ↑ Ellis, E. E. (1992). The Old Testament in Early Christianity. Baker. p. 34. ISBN 978-3161456602. https://books.google.com/books?id=978VyfpZy7YC&q=E.+E.+Ellis%2C+The+Old+Testament+in+Early+Christianity&pg=PA78. Retrieved 4 November 2014. 
  29. ↑ Hengel, Martin (2004). The Septuagint as Christian Scripture. Baker. pp. 58–59. ISBN 978-0567082879. https://books.google.com/books?id=LUmGZ0NiweAC&q=wishes+to+be+a+Christian+book. 
  30. ↑ Beckwith, Roger (1986). The Old Testament Canon of the New Testament Church. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans. p. 382. 
  31. ↑ James Akin, Defending the Deuterocanonicals, EWTN, https://www.ewtn.com/library/ANSWERS/DEUTEROS.HTM 
  32. ↑ Copan, Paul; Litwak, Kenneth D. (2014). The Gospel in the Marketplace of Ideas Paulþs Mars Hill Experience for Our Pluralistic World. Intervarsity Pr. p. 131. ISBN 978-0830840434. 
  33. ↑ Josephus wrote in Against Apion, I, 8: "We have not 10,000 books among us, disagreeing with and contradicting one another, but only twenty-two books which contain the records of all time, and are justly believed to be divine." These 22 books make up the canon of the Hebrew Bible.
  34. ↑ "Athanasius on the Canon of Scripture". http://www.bible-researcher.com/athanasius.html. 
  35. ↑ Eusebius of Caesarea. Ecclesiastical History Book 6 Chapter 25:1–2. newadvent. http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/250106.htm. Retrieved 12 October 2016. 
  36. ↑ "Church Fathers: Church History, Book IV (Eusebius)". Newadvent.org. http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/250104.htm. 
  37. ↑ "Canon of the Old and New Testaments Ascertained, or The Bible Complete without the Apocrypha and Unwritten Traditions. – Christian Classics Ethereal Library". Ccel.org. 15 November 2006. http://www.ccel.org/ccel/alexander_a/canon.iii.iii.html. 
  38. ↑ 38.0 38.1 Cyril of Jerusalem. Catechetical Lecture 4 Chapter 35. newadvent. http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/310104.htm. Retrieved 12 October 2016. 
  39. ↑ "NPNF2-04. Athanasius: Select Works and Letters – Christian Classics Ethereal Library". http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf204.xxv.iii.iii.xxv.html. 
  40. ↑ Williams, translated by Frank (1987). The Panarion of Epiphanius of Salamis 8:6:1–3 (2. impression. ed.). Leiden: E.J. Brill. ISBN 9004079262. http://www.masseiana.org/panarion_bk1.htm. Retrieved 11 October 2016. 
  41. ↑ Augustine of Hippo. On Christian Doctrine Book II Chapter 8:2. newadvent. http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/12022.htm. Retrieved 12 October 2016. 
  42. ↑ 42.0 42.1 Rufinus of Aquileia. Commentary on the Apostles' Creed #38. newadvent. http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/2711.htm. Retrieved 12 October 2016. 
  43. ↑ Rufinus, A Commentary on the Apostle's Creed; in: Philip Schaff, The Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, Second Series, Vol. 3, (NPNF2-03) Theodoret, Jerome, Gennadius, & Rufinus: Historical Writings, p. 545
  44. ↑ Westcott, Brooke Foss (2005). A general survey of the history of the canon of the New Testament (6th ed.). Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock. p. 570. ISBN 1597522392. 
  45. ↑ "According to Augustine, five books were sometimes ascribed to Solomon: Proverbs, Ecclesiastes, Song of Songs, Wisdom of Solomon, and Ecclesiasticus.". http://www.bible-researcher.com/innocent.html. 
  46. ↑ Innocent I, Bible Research, http://www.bible-researcher.com/innocent.html 
  47. ↑ Lietzmann, Hans. Muratorian fragment. http://www.bible-researcher.com/muratorian.html. Retrieved 14 October 2017. 
  48. ↑ 48.0 48.1 Synod of Laodicea Canon 60. newadvent. http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/3806.htm. Retrieved 12 October 2016. 
  49. ↑ Gallagher, Edmon L.; Meade, John.D. (2017). The Biblical Canon Lists of Early Christianity. OUP. pp. 131. 
  50. ↑ 50.0 50.1 McDonald & Sanders, editors of The Canon Debate, 2002, chapter 5: The Septuagint: The Bible of Hellenistic Judaism by Albert C. Sundberg Jr., p. 72, Appendix D-2, note 19.
  51. ↑ 51.0 51.1 Everett Ferguson, "Factors leading to the Selection and Closure of the New Testament Canon," in The Canon Debate. eds. L. M. McDonald & J. A. Sanders (Hendrickson, 2002) p. 320.
  52. ↑ 52.0 52.1 F. F. Bruce (1988), The Canon of Scripture. Intervarsity Press, p. 230.
  53. ↑ 53.0 53.1 Augustine, De Civitate Dei 22.8
  54. ↑ "Canon XXIV. (Greek xxvii.)", The Canons of the 217 Blessed Fathers who assembled at Carthage, Christian Classics Ethereal Library, http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf214.xv.iv.iv.xxv.html 
  55. ↑ B.F. Westcott, A General Survey of the History of the Canon of the New Testament (5th ed. Edinburgh, 1881), pp. 440, 541–542.
  56. ↑ "Church Fathers: Council of Carthage (A.D. 419)". http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/3816.htm. 
  57. ↑ Council in Trullo. The Apostolic Canons. Canon 85. newadvent. http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/3820.htm. Retrieved 12 October 2016. 
  58. ↑ 58.0 58.1 "Eccumenical Council of Florence and Council of Basel". https://www.ewtn.com/library/COUNCILS/FLORENCE.HTM. 
  59. ↑ "Paul III  Council of Trent-4". https://www.ewtn.com/library/COUNCILS/TRENT4.htm. 
  60. ↑ Edgecomb, Kevin P. (14 August 2006). "Jerome's Prologue to Jeremiah". http://www.bombaxo.com/blog/?p=233. 
  61. ↑ Kelly, J. N. D. (1960). Early Christian Doctrines. San Francisco: Harper. p. 55. 
  62. ↑ Barber, Michael (6 March 2006). "Loose Canons: The Development of the Old Testament (Part 2)". http://www.thesacredpage.com/2006/03/loose-canons-development-of-old_06.html. 
  63. ↑ Jerome, To Paulinus, Epistle 58 (A.D. 395), in NPNF2, VI:119.: "Do not, my dearest brother, estimate my worth by the number of my years. Gray hairs are not wisdom; it is wisdom which is as good as gray hairs At least that is what Solomon says: 'wisdom is the gray hair unto men.' [Wisdom 4:9]" Moses too in choosing the seventy elders is told to take those whom he knows to be elders indeed, and to select them not for their years but for their discretion [Num. 11:16]? And, as a boy, Daniel judges old men and in the flower of youth condemns the incontinence of age [Daniel 13:55–59 aka Story of Susannah 55–59]"
  64. ↑ Jerome, To Oceanus, Epistle 77:4 (A.D. 399), in NPNF2, VI:159.: "I would cite the words of the psalmist: 'the sacrifices of God are a broken spirit,' [Ps 51:17] and those of Ezekiel 'I prefer the repentance of a sinner rather than his death,' [Ez 18:23] and those of Baruch, 'Arise, arise, O Jerusalem,' [Baruch 5:5] and many other proclamations made by the trumpets of the Prophets."
  65. ↑ Jerome, Letter 51, 6, 7, NPNF2, VI:87–8: "For in the book of Wisdom, which is inscribed with his name, Solomon says: 'God created man to be immortal, and made him to be an image of his own eternity.' [Wisdom 2:23]...Instead of the three proofs from Holy Scripture which you said would satisfy you if I could produce them, behold I have given you seven"
  66. ↑ Barker, Henry (21 October 2010). English Bible Versions. Cambridge University Press. p. 33. ISBN 978-1108024549. https://books.google.com/books?id=tRk7FHkAuEAC&q=jerome+quotes++the+apocrypha+++++&pg=PA33. Retrieved 27 October 2016. 
  67. ↑ Werrell, Ralph S. (29 August 2013). The Roots of William Tyndale's Theology (paperback ed.). James Clarke & Co. p. 57. ISBN 978-0227174029. https://books.google.com/books?id=kaAABAAAQBAJ&q=luther+quotes+from+apocrypha+but+they+did+not+consider+scripture. Retrieved 27 October 2016. 
  68. ↑ Edgecomb, Kevin P. (5 August 2006). "Jerome's Prologue to Judith". http://www.bombaxo.com/blog/jeromes-prologue-to-judith/. 
  69. ↑ 69.0 69.1 Jerome, "Apology Against Rufinus (Book II)", in Philip Schaff, Henry Wace, Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, Second Series, 3 (1892 ed.), Buffalo, NY: Christian Literature Publishing Co. (retrieved from New Advent), http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/27102.htm 
  70. ↑ Canons and Decrees of the Council of Trent, The Fourth Session, 1546.
  71. ↑ "Denzinger – English translation, older numbering". http://patristica.net/denzinger/#n2100. "2198 [...] "This decree [of January 13, 1897] was passed to check the audacity of private teachers who attributed to themselves the right either of rejecting entirely the authenticity of the Johannine comma, or at least of calling it into question by their own final judgment. But it was not meant at all to prevent Catholic writers from investigating the subject more fully and, after weighing the arguments accurately on both sides, with that and temperance which the gravity of the subject requires, from inclining toward an opinion in opposition to its authenticity, provided they professed that they were ready to abide by the judgment of the Church, to which the duty was delegated by Jesus Christ not only of interpreting Holy Scripture but also of guarding it faithfully."" 
  72. ↑ "The Council of Trent – Session 4". http://www.thecounciloftrent.com/ch4.htm. 
  73. ↑ Jerome. Vulgate Latin Bible With English Translation. http://vulgate.org/. Retrieved 11 July 2018. 
  74. ↑ Austin, Kenneth; Coudert, Allison P.; Shoulson, Jeffrey S. (2006). "Hebraica Veritas? Christian Hebraists and the Study of Judaism in Early Modern Europe". The Sixteenth Century Journal 37 (2): 630. doi:10.2307/20477972. 
  75. ↑ Tov, Emanuel (2014). "The Myth of the Stabilization of the Text of Hebrew Scripture". The Text of the Hebrew Bible. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. pp. 37–46. doi:10.13109/9783666550645.37. ISBN 978-3-525-55064-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.13109/9783666550645.37. 
  76. ↑ Austin, Kenneth; Coudert, Allison P.; Shoulson, Jeffrey S. (2006-07-01). "Hebraica Veritas? Christian Hebraists and the Study of Judaism in Early Modern Europe". The Sixteenth Century Journal 37 (2): 630. doi:10.2307/20477972. ISSN 0361-0160. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/20477972. 
  77. ↑ Tov, Emanuel (2014-01-19), "The Myth of the Stabilization of the Text of Hebrew Scripture", The Text of the Hebrew Bible (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht): pp. 37–46, doi:10.13109/9783666550645.37, ISBN 978-3-525-55064-9, http://dx.doi.org/10.13109/9783666550645.37, retrieved 2022-09-02 
  78. ↑ The Vulgate, website: 5 Minutes in Church History, viewed on 19 June 2021, https://www.5minutesinchurchhistory.com/the-vulgate/
  79. ↑ 79.0 79.1 What is the Vulgate and why is it important?, Philip Kosloski - published on 30 September 2019, Aleteia, viewed on 20 June 2021, https://aleteia.org/2019/09/30/what-is-the-vulgate-and-why-is-it-important/
  80. ↑ 80.0 80.1 Philip Schaff, "Chapter IX. Theological Controversies, and Development of the Ecumenical Orthodoxy", History of the Christian Church, CCEL, http://www.ccel.org/s/schaff/history/3_ch09.htm 
  81. ↑ 81.0 81.1 Van Liere, Frans (2012). "The Latin Bible, c. 900 to the Council of Trent". New Cambridge History of the Bible; Vol II. Cambridge University Press. pp. 93–109. 
  82. ↑ Athanas of Alexandria. Church Fathers: Letter 39 (Athanasius). newadvent. http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/2806039.htm. Retrieved 14 October 2016. 
  83. ↑ The Panarion of Epiphanius of Salamis 8:6:1-3 (2. impression. ed.). Leiden: E.J. Brill. 1987. ISBN 9004079262. http://www.masseiana.org/panarion_bk1.htm. Retrieved 11 October 2016. 
  84. ↑ Biblia Sacra iuxta vulgatam versionem (4 ed.). Stuttgart: Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft. 1994. pp. XXXIV. ISBN 978-3-438-05303-9. 
  85. ↑ 85.0 85.1 85.2 Bogaert, Pierre-Maurice (2005). "Le livre de Baruch dans les manuscrits de la Bible latine. Disparition et réintégration". Revue Bénédictine 115 (2): 286–342. doi:10.1484/J.RB.5.100598. 
  86. ↑ Yee, Gale A.; Coomber, Matthew J. M.; Page, Hugh R. (2014). Fortress Commentary on the Bible: The Old Testament and Apocrypha. Augsburg Fortress Publishers. p. 1100. ISBN 978-0-8006-9916-1. 
  87. ↑ 87.0 87.1 DeGregorio, Scott (2006). Bede on Ezra and Nehemiah. Liverpool University Press. pp. xvii. 
  88. ↑ Gallagher, Edmon L.; Meade, John D. (2017), The Biblical Canon Lists from Early Christianity, OUP, pp. 269 
  89. ↑ "St. Jerome, The Prologue on the Book of Ezra: English translation". http://www.tertullian.org/fathers/jerome_preface_ezra.htm. 
  90. ↑ Bogaert, Pierre-Maurice (2000). "Les livres d'Esdras et leur numérotation dans l'histoire du canon de la Bible latin". Revue Bénédictine 110 (1–2): 17–20. doi:10.1484/J.RB.5.100750. 
  91. ↑ Bogaert, Pierre-Maurice (2000). "Les livres d'Esdras et leur numérotation dans l'histoire du canon de la Bible latin". Revue Bénédictine 110 (1–2): 5–26. doi:10.1484/J.RB.5.100750. 
  92. ↑ Hamilton, Alastair (2006). The Copts and the West; 1439–1822. OUP. pp. 54. 
  93. ↑ Council of Trent, Session 4, 8 April 1546.
  94. ↑ Hubert Jedin, Papal Legate at the Council of Trent (St Louis: B. Herder Book Co., 1947), pp. 270–71, 278.
  95. ↑ Commentary on all the Authentic Historical Books of the Old Testament, In ult. Cap., Esther.
  96. ↑ "Alpha and Omega Ministries". http://www.aomin.org/aoblog/?itemid=1877?itemid=1877. 
  97. ↑ Orthodox Answer To a Question About Apocrypha, Canon, Deuterocanonical – Answer #39
  98. ↑ 98.0 98.1 S. T. Kimbrough (2005). Orthodox And Wesleyan Scriptural Understanding And Practice. St Vladimir's Seminary Press. p. 23. ISBN 978-0881413014. https://books.google.com/books?id=q-vhwjamOioC&pg=PA23. .
  99. ↑ Dennis Bratcher, ed., The Confession of Dositheus (Eastern Orthodox, 1672), Question 3, CRI / Voice, Institute, http://www.crivoice.org/creeddositheus.html 
  100. ↑ Cowley, R. W. (1974). "The Biblical Canon Of The Ethiopian Orthodox Church Today". Ostkirchliche Studien 23: 318–323. http://www.islamic-awareness.org/Bible/Text/Canon/ethiopican.html. 
  101. ↑ deSilva, David A. (2018). Introducing the Apocrypha: Message, Context, and Significance. Baker Books. ISBN 978-1493413072. [page needed]
  102. ↑ "VI", Articles of Religion, The Church of England, https://www.churchofengland.org/prayer-worship/worship/book-of-common-prayer/articles-of-religion.aspx 
  103. ↑ "Kyrie Patokrator". 22 May 2012. http://www.episcopalchurch.org/library/glossary/kyrie-pantokrator. 
  104. ↑ Thomas, Owen C.; Wondra, Ellen K. (2002). Introduction to Theology, 3rd Edition. Church Publishing, Inc.. p. 56. ISBN 978-0819218971. 
  105. ↑ Consultation on Common Texts, ed (2012). The Revised Common Lectionary. Augsburg Fortress. pp. 177, 188. ISBN 978-1451438475. https://books.google.com/books?id=lmg7UhF5rUEC. 
  106. ↑ "What are the Apocrypha and Deuterocanonical Books? | Resources | American Bible Society". https://bibleresources.americanbible.org/resource/what-are-the-apocrypha-and-deuterocanonical-books. 
  107. ↑ "Anglican Communion Home Page". https://www.anglicancommunion.org/. 
  108. ↑ Society of Biblical Literature (2014). The SBL Handbook of Style 2nd Edition. Williston, VT: SBL Press. p. 111. ISBN 978-1589839649. 
  109. ↑ 109.0 109.1 The Popular and Critical Bible Encyclopædia and Scriptural Dictionary, Fully Defining and Explaining All Religious Terms, Including Biographical, Geographical, Historical, Archæological and Doctrinal Themes, p. 521, edited by Samuel Fallows et al., The Howard-Severance company, 1901, 1910. – Google Books
  110. ↑ John Wesley (1825). The Sunday Service of the Methodists; With Other Occasional Services. J. Kershaw. p. 136. 
  111. ↑ "The Revised Common Lectionary". Consultation on Common Texts. 1992. http://www.commontexts.org/rcl/rcl_introduction_web.pdf. "In all places where a reading from the deuterocanonical books (The Apocrypha) is listed, an alternate reading from the canonical Scriptures has also been provided." 
  112. ↑ "Chapter I, III". Westminster Confession of Faith. ccel.org. http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/creeds3.iv.xvii.ii.html. 
  113. ↑ The Psalms and hymns, with doctrinal standards and liturgy of the Reformed Church in America. Board of Publications of the Reformed Church in America. 1859. https://books.google.com/books?id=3RQQAAAAIAAJ&q=%22All+which+the+Church+may+read+and+take+instruction+from%2C+so+far+as+they+agree+with+the+canonical+books%3B+but+they+are+far+from+having+such+power+and+efficacy+as+that+we+may+from+their+testimony+confirm+any+point+of+faith+or+of+the+Christian+religion%3B+much+less+to+detract+from+the+authority+of+the+other+sacred+books.%22&pg=RA1-PA36. 
  114. ↑ James Akin, Defending the Deuterocanonicals, EWTN, https://www.ewtn.com/library/ANSWERS/DEUTEROS.HTM 

Further reading

  • Harrington, Daniel J. Invitation to the Apocrypha. Grand Rapids, Michigan: W.B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1999. ISBN:978-0802846334
  • Roach, Corwin C. The Apocrypha: the Hidden Books of the Bible. Cincinnati, Ohio: Forward Movement Publications, 1966 – Concerns the Deuterocanonical writings (Apocrypha), according to Anglican usage. [ISBN missing]

External links



Retrieved from "https://handwiki.org/wiki/index.php?title=Religion:Deuterocanonical_books&oldid=3220612"