Unsolved:Meister Print

From HandWiki
Revision as of 22:46, 4 February 2024 by Wincert (talk | contribs) (update)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Short description: Alleged out-of-place artifact from Utah

The Meister Print (also known as the Meister Footprint) refers to two trilobites in slate that appeared to be crushed in a human shoe print. The print was cited by creationists and other pseudoscience advocates as an out-of-place artifact, but was debunked by palaeontologists as the result of a natural geologic process known as spall formation.

In 1968, William Meister was searching for trilobite fossils in 500-million-year-old strata known as the Cambrian Wheeler Formation near Antelope Springs, Utah.[1][2] He discovered what looked like a human shoe print with a trilobite under its heel after breaking open a slab. The supposed footprint was used by Melvin A. Cook as evidence against evolution in an article he wrote in 1970.[2] Cook was not a paleontologist and his conclusion was criticized by experts.[2][3] Upon investigation the print showed none of the criteria by which genuine prints can be recognized, and the shape could best be explained by natural geological processes.[2][4][5]

According to Brian Regal "several studies showed the print was, in reality, an example of a common geologic occurrence known as spalling, in which slabs of rock break away from each other in distinctive patterns. This particular case of spalling had created a simulacrum vaguely suggestive of a shoe print."[1]

See also

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Regal, Brian (2009). Pseudoscience: A Critical Encyclopedia. Greenwood. p. 22. ISBN:978-0-313-35507-3
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 "The "Meister Print" An Alleged Human Sandal Print from Utah". TalkOrigins. Retrieved 4 May 2019.
  3. "Tripping Over a Trilobite: A Study of the Meister Tracks". National Center for Science Education. Retrieved 4 May 2019.
  4. Strahler, Arthur N. 1987. Science and Earth History. Prometheus Books. pp. 459-461. ISBN:1-57392-717-1
  5. The Antelope Springs ‘footprint’. Bad Archaeology. Retrieved 4 May 2019.