Medicine:Wells score (pulmonary embolism)

From HandWiki
Revision as of 02:02, 5 February 2024 by AIposter (talk | contribs) (update)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Short description: Estimates probability of pulmonary embolism


The Wells score is a clinical prediction rule used to classify patients suspected of having pulmonary embolism (PE) into risk groups by quantifying the pre-test probability. It is different than Wells score for DVT (deep vein thrombosis). It was originally described by Wells et al. in 1998,[1] using their experience from creating Wells score for DVT in 1995.[2] Today, there are multiple (revised or simplified) versions of the rule, which may lead to ambiguity.[1][3][4]

The purpose of the rule is to select the best method of investigation (e.g. D-dimer testing, CT angiography) for ruling in or ruling out the diagnosis of PE, and to improve the interpretation and accuracy of subsequent testing, based on a Bayesian framework for the probability of the diagnosis.

The rule is more objective than clinician gestalt, but still includes subjective opinion (unlike e.g. Geneva score).

Original algorithm[1]

Originally it was developed in 1998 to improve the low specificity of V/Q scan results (which then had a more important role in the workup of PE than now).

It categorized patients into 3 categories: low / moderate / high probability. It was formulated in the form of an algorithm, not a score.

Subsequent testing choices were V/Q scanning, pulmonary angiography, and serial compression ultrasound.

Revised score [3][4]

The emergence of D-dimer assays prompted the revision of the rule.

This version was published as a score, and according to the final score, patients could be categorized in either 3 groups (low / intermediate / high risk) or 2 groups (low / high risk)

Subsequent testing choices included D-dimer testing for low risk cases, and V/Q scanning, pulmonary angiography, and compression ultrasonography for intermediate / high risk patients and low-risk patients with positive D-dimer results.

Wells score for PE [3]
Variable Points
Clinical signs and symptoms of DVT 3
An alternate diagnosis is less likely than PE 3
Heart rate >100 1.5
Immobilization or surgery in the previous 4 weeks 1.5
Previous DVT / PE 1.5
Hemoptysis 1
Malignancy (treatment currently, in the previous 6 months, or palliative) 1

Risk of PE using 3 categories (data from the derivation group)

Risk group Points required Risk of PE
Low risk 0-1 3.6%
Moderate risk 2-6 20.5%
High risk >6 66.7%

Risk of PE using 2 categories (data from the derivation group)

Risk group Points required Risk of PE
Low 0-4 5.1%
High >4 39.1%

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 Wells, Philip S.; Ginsberg, Jeffrey S.; Anderson, David R.; Kearon, Clive; Gent, Michael; Turpie, Alexander G.; Bormanis, Janis; Weitz, Jeffrey et al. (1998-12-15). "Use of a Clinical Model for Safe Management of Patients with Suspected Pulmonary Embolism". Annals of Internal Medicine 129 (12): 997–1005. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-129-12-199812150-00002. ISSN 0003-4819. PMID 9867786. https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/0003-4819-129-12-199812150-00002. 
  2. Wells, P. S.; Hirsh, J.; Anderson, D. R.; Lensing, A. W.; Foster, G.; Kearon, C.; Weitz, J.; D'Ovidio, R. et al. (1995-05-27). "Accuracy of clinical assessment of deep-vein thrombosis". Lancet 345 (8961): 1326–1330. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(95)92535-x. ISSN 0140-6736. PMID 7752753. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7752753/. 
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 Wells, P. S.; Anderson, D. R.; Rodger, M.; Ginsberg, J. S.; Kearon, C.; Gent, M.; Turpie, A. G.; Bormanis, J. et al. (March 2000). "Derivation of a simple clinical model to categorize patients probability of pulmonary embolism: increasing the models utility with the SimpliRED D-dimer". Thrombosis and Haemostasis 83 (3): 416–420. doi:10.1055/s-0037-1613830. ISSN 0340-6245. PMID 10744147. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10744147/. 
  4. 4.0 4.1 Wells, Philip S.; Anderson, David R.; Rodger, Marc; Stiell, Ian; Dreyer, Jonathan F.; Barnes, David; Forgie, Melissa; Kovacs, George et al. (2001-07-17). "Excluding Pulmonary Embolism at the Bedside without Diagnostic Imaging: Management of Patients with Suspected Pulmonary Embolism Presenting to the Emergency Department by Using a Simple Clinical Model and d-dimer". Annals of Internal Medicine 135 (2): 98–107. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-135-2-200107170-00010. ISSN 0003-4819. PMID 11453709. https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/0003-4819-135-2-200107170-00010.