Physics:Standard wind tunnel models

From HandWiki
Revision as of 02:36, 5 February 2024 by Wincert (talk | contribs) (change)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
AGARD-B standard wind tunnel model on the model support of the T-38 wind tunnel
Theoretical geometry of the AGARD-B standard wind tunnel model and its sting fixture; all dimensions are relative to body diameter D (dimensions according to.[1])

Standard wind tunnel models, also known as reference models, calibration models (French: maquettes d'étalonnage) or test check-standards are objects of relatively simple and precisely defined shapes, having known aerodynamic characteristics, that are tested in wind tunnels. Standard models are used in order to verify, by comparison of wind tunnel test results with previously published results, the complete measurement chain in a wind tunnel, including wind tunnel structure, quality of the airstream, model positioning, transducers and force balances, data acquisition system and data reduction software.[2][3]

More specifically, standard wind tunnel models are used for:

  • confirmation of the reliability of the data from a new wind tunnel by comparison with results from other wind tunnel facilities;
  • providing baselines for correlation of results from different wind tunnels;
  • checkouts of data repeatability over time;
  • checkouts of data repeatability after repairs or modifications of the wind tunnel structure;
  • assessment of the wall interference effects;
  • identification of problems and faults in the operation of a wind tunnel;
  • verification of new measurement techniques or devices;
  • training of wind tunnel personnel.

Besides, results from wind tunnel tests of standard models are used as test cases for verification of computational-fluid-dynamics (CFD) computer codes.

In most wind tunnels, standard models are tested during the commissioning and calibration[2][3][4] of the facility. This sometimes has an unfortunate effect that the test results are not as good as they can be, because the wind tunnel and its measurement system have not yet been optimally tuned at the time of the test.[5] However, some laboratories have adopted the practice of periodical testing of a standard model every couple of years in order to provide a continued confidence in the reliability of measurements in their wind tunnels .[6][7]

Standard wind tunnel models are usually (but not always) intended for one of the basic wind tunnel measurement types, such as the measurement of forces and moments with force balances or measurements of pressure distribution. Results of wind tunnel tests of these models are generally published in the form of nondimensional aerodynamic coefficients (thus being made independent of model size) and made available to the wind-tunnel community, often in review reports containing inter-facility comparisons of data,[5][8][9][10] discussing observed scatter of results, different testing conditions, production differences between models etc.

As the majority of wind tunnel tests is related to aeronautics, most standard wind tunnel models resemble simplified forms of wings, airplanes or missiles. Such are, for static tests: NACA 0012 and CLARK Y (2D wing-segment models with typical airfoils), AGARD-B / AGARD-C (generic delta-wing-airplane shapes), ONERA-M (a generic transport-airplane shape), HB-2 (Hypervelocity ballistic model 2, a shape similar to a reentry-body). For dynamic tests, the often-used standard models are: SDM (Standard dynamic model, a generic fighter-like airplane shape somewhat similar to F-16)), BFM (Basic finner model, a generic conical-cylindrical missile with four fins at the rear end) and MBFM (Modified basic finner model[11]). A number of other standard models exists as well.

With the increased use of wind tunnels in the testing of road vehicles, several standard models of generic car shapes were defined.,[12] such as the Ahmed body[13] ,[14] MIRA reference car ,[15] etc.

Some wind tunnel laboratories perform periodical checkouts using internally defined standard models that are selected from the repository of models previously tested in the facility[16]

Geometry of a standard wind tunnel model is defined relative to some easily identified parameter (see figure), e.g. body diameter or wing chord.[1] The geometry is published by the institution proposing the model. Beside the model itself, a standard model support, such as a sting, to be used with the model, is usually defined. An actual model is built to a size suitable for the size of a specific wind tunnel test section, in particular taking care that the frontal blockage of the model (the ratio of the model cross-section area to wind tunnel test section area) is kept well below 1% (except for wall-interference research where the models may be larger).

In order to eliminate the effects of production differences between models in inter-facility comparisons, sometimes the same physical standard model is tested in several wind tunnels [8]

See also

Wind tunnel

AGARD-B wind tunnel model

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Wind Tunnel Calibration Models, AGARD Specification 2, AGARD, 1958
  2. 2.0 2.1 Reed T.D., Pope T.C., Coksey T.M., "Calibration of Transonic and Supersonic Wind Tunnels", NASA CR 2920, NASA, 1977
  3. 3.0 3.1 Pope A., "Wind Tunnel Calibration Techniques", AGARDograph 54, AGARD, 1961
  4. "Recommended Practice: Calibration of Subsonic and Transonic Wind Tunnels", AIAA-R093-2003, AIAA, 2003
  5. 5.0 5.1 Hills R., "A review of measurements on AGARD Calibration Models" , AGARDograph 64, Aircraft Research Association Bedford, England, 1961.
  6. Hemsch M., Grubb J., Krieger W., Cler D., "Langley Wind Tunnel Data Quality Assurance: Check Standard Results", AIAA 2000-2201, 21st AIAA Advanced Measurement Technology and Ground Testing Conference, 2000
  7. Damljanoviċ D, Isakoviċ J. and Rašuo B., "T-38 Wind-Tunnel Data Quality Assurance Based on Testing of a Standard Model", Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 50, No. 4 (2013), pp. 1141-1149. doi: 10.2514/1.C032081
  8. 8.0 8.1 Damljanoviċ D., Vitiċ A, Vukovic Ð., Isakoviċ J., "Testing of AGARD-B calibration model in the T-38 Trisonic Wind Tunnel", Scientific Technical Review 56 (2), 2006, pp. 52-62
  9. Gray J.D., "Summary Report on Aerodynamic Characteristics of Standard Models HB-1 and HB-2" AEDC-TR-64-137, Arnold Engineering Development Center, 1964
  10. Binion T.W. Jr., "Testing of the ONERA Calibration Models in Three Transonc Wind Tunnels", AEDC-TR-76-133, Arnold Engineering Development Center, 1976
  11. Samardžić M., Anastasijević Z., Marinkovski D., Isaković J., Tančić Lj., "Measurement of pitch- and roll-damping derivatives using the semiconductor five-component strain gauge balance", Proc ImechE Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, Vol.228 no. 11, November 2012, pp.1401-1411
  12. LeGood G, Gerry, K. "On the Use of Reference Models in Automotive Aerodynamics,"SAE Technical Paper 2004-01-1308, 2004, doi:10.4271/2004-01-1308
  13. "Ahmed body", CFD Online Wiki
  14. R.H. Khann, S. Umale, "CFD Aerodynamic Analysis of Ahmed Body", International Journal of engineering trends and Technology (IJETT), Vol.17 No. 7, December 2014, pp.301-308
  15. Y. Wang, Y. Xin, Zh. Gu, Sh. Wang, Y. Deng and X. Yang, "Numerical and Experimental Investigations on the Aerodynamic Characteristic of Three Typical Passenger Vehicles" Journal of Applied Fluid Mechanics, Vol.7 No. 4, 2014, pp.659-671
  16. Erickson G.E. "Overview of Supersonic Measurement Techniques in the NASA Langley Unitary Plan Wind Tunnel", NASA/TM-2007-214894, NASA, 2007

External links