Social:Positionality statement

From HandWiki
Revision as of 13:19, 5 February 2024 by CodeMe (talk | contribs) (fixing)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Short description: Description of one's group identities

A positionality statement, also called reflexivity statement or identity statement, is a statement whereby a person, such as a researcher or teacher, reports and discusses their group identities, such as in a grant proposal or journal submission.[1][2][3] They became commonplace in certain fields of social science, especially within the United States.[1][2][4]

Positionality statements focus on an "author's racial, gender, class, or other self-identifications, experiences, and privileges", based on the idea that the author's identity can, intentionally or not, influence the results of their research.[5] Scholars have commonly identified this risk in cases where the researcher is the sole point of connection between the audience and research subjects[6] and, relatedly, when there exists a known power imbalance between the researcher and the research subject[7][8]. The expectation and/or practice of writing a positionality statement can also inform the researcher of ways to mitigate the influence of their personal identity on the research by clarifying such interactions before the data collection or analysis process concludes. [9] [10]

Positionality statements have also attracted controversy, being alternatively labeled by detractors as "research segregation", "positional piety", and "loyalty oaths".[11][12][13] According to critics, an author may claim moral authority through affinity with subjects, or through a confession of difference of relative privilege. This has given rise to the concern that positionality statements can lead to "positional piety", where researchers are considered more or less credible based on race, gender, or other characteristics.[11] On the other hand, supporters of positionality statements point out that such criticisms often stem from "bad" positionality statements, and instead argue for a comprehensive standard of quality. [14]

In Education

Positionality statements have increased in popularity during the 2000s, required not just of researchers, but also students. A challenge has been the phenomenon of "phony positionality", wherein students learn to voice the beliefs expected in positionality statements without actually believing them. This "performative" positionality has been an obstacle to their adoption in the classroom.[15]

See also

References

  1. ↑ 1.0 1.1 Brown, Brandy (24 February 2022). "POSITIONALITY, INTERSECTIONALITY, AND PRIVILEGE IN HEALTH PROFESSIONS EDUCATION & RESEARCH". Maine Medical Center Institute for Teaching Excellence. https://www.mitemmc.org/monthly-tips/positionality-intersectionality-and-privilege-in-health-professions-education-research/. 
  2. ↑ 2.0 2.1 Abdelghaffar, Alaa. "Positionality Statement". Loyola University Chicago. https://www.luc.edu/fcip/anti-racistpedagogy/anti-racistpedagogyresources/positionalitystatement/. 
  3. ↑ Wilson, Caitlin; Janes, Gillian; Williams, Julia (1 September 2022). "Identity, positionality and reflexivity: relevance and application to research paramedics". British Paramedic Journal 7 (2): 43–49. doi:10.29045/14784726.2022.09.7.2.43. PMID 36448000. 
  4. ↑ Holmes, Andrew Gary Darwin (2020). "Researcher Positionality - A Consideration of Its Influence and Place in Qualitative Research - A New Researcher Guide". Shanlax International Journal of Education 8 (4): 1–10. doi:10.34293/education.v8i4.3232. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1268044.pdf. Retrieved 17 April 2023. 
  5. ↑ Massoud, Mark Fathi (2022). "The price of positionality: assessing the benefits and burdens of self-identification in research methods". Journal of Law and Society 49. doi:10.1111/jols.12372. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jols.12372. 
  6. ↑ Sutton, J; Austin, Z (2015). "Qualitative research: Data collection, analysis, and management". The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy 68 (3): 226. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4485510/. Retrieved 31 January 2024. 
  7. ↑ Ladson-Billings, G (2000). "Racialized discourses and ethnic epistemologies". Handbook of qualitative research 2 (1): 257-277. 
  8. ↑ Chapman, T. K. (2007). "Interrogating classroom relationships and events: Using portraiture and critical race theory in education research". Educational Researcher 36 (3): 156-162. 
  9. ↑ Bourke, B (2014). "Positionality: Reflecting on the research process". The qualitative report 19 (33): 1-9. 
  10. ↑ Milner, Richard H. (2007). "Race, culture, and researcher positionality: Working through dangers seen, unseen, and unforeseen". Educational researcher 36 (7): 388-400. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/51087095.pdf. Retrieved 31 January 2024. 
  11. ↑ 11.0 11.1 Cousin, Glynis. "Positioning positionality." New approaches to qualitative research: Wisdom and uncertainty (2010): 9-18.
  12. ↑ https://www.chronicle.com/article/ideological-signaling-has-no-role-in-research
  13. ↑ Savolainen, Jukka (10 April 2023). "'Positionality statements' smuggle identity politics into academia". UnHerd. https://unherd.com/thepost/positionality-statements-smuggle-identity-politics-into-academia/. 
  14. ↑ Sybing, R (2022). "Dead reckoning: A framework for analyzing positionality statements in ethnographic research reporting". Written Communication 39 (4): 757-789. 
  15. ↑ Macfarlane, Bruce. "Methodology, fake learning, and emotional performativity." ECNU Review of Education 5.1 (2022): 140-155.




Retrieved from "https://handwiki.org/wiki/index.php?title=Social:Positionality_statement&oldid=3302835"