Babuška–Lax–Milgram theorem

From HandWiki
Short description: Mathematical theorem

In mathematics, the Generalized–Lax–Milgram theorem is a generalization of the famous Lax–Milgram theorem, which gives conditions under which a bilinear form can be "inverted" to show the existence and uniqueness of a weak solution to a given boundary value problem. The result was proved by J Necas in 1962, and is a generalization of the famous Lax Milgram theorem by Peter Lax and Arthur Milgram.

Background

In the modern, functional-analytic approach to the study of partial differential equations, one does not attempt to solve a given partial differential equation directly, but by using the structure of the vector space of possible solutions, e.g. a Sobolev space W k,p. Abstractly, consider two real normed spaces U and V with their continuous dual spaces U∗ and V∗ respectively. In many applications, U is the space of possible solutions; given some partial differential operator Λ : U → V∗ and a specified element f ∈ V∗, the objective is to find a u ∈ U such that

Λu=f.

However, in the weak formulation, this equation is only required to hold when "tested" against all other possible elements of V. This "testing" is accomplished by means of a bilinear function B : U × V → R which encodes the differential operator Λ; a weak solution to the problem is to find a u ∈ U such that

B(u,v)=⟨f,v⟩ for all v∈V.

The achievement of Lax and Milgram in their 1954 result was to specify sufficient conditions for this weak formulation to have a unique solution that depends continuously upon the specified datum f ∈ V∗: it suffices that U = V is a Hilbert space, that B is continuous, and that B is strongly coercive, i.e.

|B(u,u)|≥c‖u‖2

for some constant c > 0 and all u ∈ U.

For example, in the solution of the Poisson equation on a bounded, open domain Ω ⊂ Rn,

{−Δu(x)=f(x),x∈Ω;u(x)=0,x∈∂Ω;

the space U could be taken to be the Sobolev space H01(Ω) with dual H−1(Ω); the former is a subspace of the Lp space V = L2(Ω); the bilinear form B associated to −Δ is the L2(Ω) inner product of the derivatives:

B(u,v)=∫Ω∇u(x)⋅∇v(x)dx.

Hence, the weak formulation of the Poisson equation, given f ∈ L2(Ω), is to find uf such that

∫Ω∇uf(x)⋅∇v(x)dx=∫Ωf(x)v(x)dx for all v∈H01(Ω).

Statement of the theorem

In 1962 J Necas provided the following generalization of Lax and Milgram's earlier result, which begins by dispensing with the requirement that U and V be the same space. Let U and V be two real Hilbert spaces and let B : U × V → R be a continuous bilinear functional. Suppose also that B is weakly coercive: for some constant c > 0 and all u ∈ U,

sup‖v‖=1|B(u,v)|≥c‖u‖

and, for all 0 ≠ v ∈ V,

sup‖u‖=1|B(u,v)|>0

Then, for all f ∈ V∗, there exists a unique solution u = uf ∈ U to the weak problem

B(uf,v)=⟨f,v⟩ for all v∈V.

Moreover, the solution depends continuously on the given data:

‖uf‖≤1c‖f‖.

Necas' proof extends directly to the situation where U is a Banach space and V a reflexive Banach space.

See also

References