Biology:Evolutionary therapy

From HandWiki

Evolutionary therapy is a subfield of evolutionary medicine that utilizes concepts from evolutionary biology in management of diseases caused by evolving entities such as cancer and microbial infections.[1] These evolving disease agents adapt to selective pressure introduced by treatment, allowing them to develop resistance to therapy, making it ineffective.[2] Evolutionary therapy relies on the notion that Darwinian evolution is the main reason behind lethality of late stage cancer and multi-drug resistant bacterial infections such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.[3] Thus, evolutionary therapy suggests that treatment of such highly dynamic evolving diseases should be changing over time to account for changes in disease populations.[4] Adaptive treatment strategies typically cycle between different drugs or drug doses to take advantage of predictable patterns of disease evolution. This is in contrast to standardized treatment approach which is applied to all patients and equally based on their cancer type and grade. There are still numerous obstacles to the use of evolutionary therapy in clinical practice. These obstacles include high contingency of trajectory, speed of evolution, and inability to track the population state of disease over time.[5][6]

Context

Resistance to chemotherapy and molecularly targeted therapies is a major problem facing current cancer research.[7] All malignant cancers are fundamentally governed by Darwinian dynamics of the somatic evolution in cancer. Malignant cancers are dynamically evolving clades of cells living in distinct microhabitats that almost certainly ensure the emergence of therapy-resistant populations. Cytotoxic cancer therapies also impose intense evolutionary selection pressures on the surviving cells and thus increase the evolutionary rate. Importantly, the principles of Darwinian dynamics also embody fundamental principles that can illuminate strategies for the successful management of cancer.[8][9] Eradicating the large, diverse and adaptive populations found in most cancers presents a formidable challenge. One centimetre cubed of cancer contains about 10^9 transformed cells and weighs about 1 gram, which means there are more cancer cells in 10 grams of tumour than there are people on Earth. Unequal cell division and differences in genetic lineages and microenvironmental selection pressures mean that the cells within a tumour are diverse both in genetic make-up and observable characteristics.

Mechanisms

Collateral sensitivity

Resistance to one drug can lead to unwanted cross-resistance to some other drugs[10] and "collateral" sensitivity to yet other drugs [11][12][13][14][15] This phenomenon can be exploited to create cyclic therapeutic regimes where each subsequent drug would make population of evolving disease agent sensitive to at least one other drug, though this process is difficult secondary to the stochasticity of evolution. [5] Alternative methods include incorporating stochastic control algorithms to direct the evolution to specific states of resistance that encode sensitivity to other drugs.[16]

Treatment strategies

Adaptive therapy

The standard approach to treating cancer is giving patients the maximum tolerated amount of chemotherapy with the goal of doing the maximum possible damage to the tumor without killing the patient. This method is relatively effective, but it also causes major toxicities.[17] Adaptive therapy is an evolutionary therapy that aims to maintain or reduce tumor volume by employing minimum effective drug doses or timed drug holidays.[18][19] The timing and duration of these holidays, which relies on the ability to modulate resistant vs. sensitive populations of cancer cells through competition, is a subject which has been studied using dynamic programming[20] as well as optimal control[21] in theoretical studies based on Evolutionary game theory based models. The ability to modulate these populations secondary relies on the assumption that there is a both frequency-dependent selection, and an associated fitness cost to that resistance, a form of which, competitive exclusion, has been directly observed in EGFR lung cancer cell lines,[22] and posited in others.

Proof of principle for adaptive therapy has also been established in a recent phase 2 clinical trial[23] [24] as well as in vivo,[17] and more rigorous quantitative studies in vitro.[25]

Double bind

In the evolutionary double bind, one drug causes increased susceptibility of the evolving cancer to another drug. Some have found that effectiveness might be based on interactions of populations through commensalism.[26] Others imply that population control may be possible if resistance to therapy requires a substantial and costly phenotypic adaptation that reduces the organism's fitness. [27]

Extinction therapy

Extinction therapy is inspired by mass extinction events from the Anthropocene era. [28] This treatment strategy is also sometimes referred to as first strike-second strike, where the first strike reduces the size and heterogeneity of a population so that the second strike that follows can kill the surviving, often fragmented population below a threshold by stochastic perturbations. [29]

Conditional defector therapy

A recent article. [30] introduced a potential therapeutic model that aims to create a tragedy of the commons within the populations of pathogens (bacteria, viruses, or even cancer). It is a well-established evolutionary prediction; cheaters can drive the whole population to go extinct. However, the success of free riders is usually supposed to be limited. Because cheater's patches will go extinct rapidly before they arrange successful migrations to other patches, this might be the fundamental problem of cheaters. However, this problem could be solved if we get a manipulated genetically engineered strain of the same pathogen, adopting a conditional defection strategy wherein free-riders would cooperate only for spread. The actors of this selfish strategy would have a high dispersal rate with the lowest possible cost because they share migration costs. Thus, the exploitation rate of public goods and interactions among defectors and cooperators will increase. In other words, this strain of conditional defectors can exclusively cooperate for all collective behaviors related to migration but defect otherwise. Therefore, these selfish successful migrators can be used as suicidal agents to drive the population of pathogens into the self-destruction process.

Current state

Although there is extensive modeling work on evolutionary therapy,[31] there are only a few completed and ongoing clinical trials that use evolutionary therapy. First one conducted in Moffitt Cancer Center on patients with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer showed outcomes that "show significant improvement over published studies and a contemporaneous population."[32] This study met with some criticism.[33]

References

  1. "Evolutionary Therapy". Open Publishing. https://labpages.moffitt.org/andersona/evoltherapy.html. 
  2. "Clonal evolution in cancer". Nature 481 (7381): 306–313. January 2012. doi:10.1038/nature10762. PMID 22258609. Bibcode2012Natur.481..306G. 
  3. "Origins and evolution of antibiotic resistance". Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews 74 (3): 417–433. September 2010. doi:10.1128/MMBR.00016-10. PMID 20805405. 
  4. "Integrating evolutionary dynamics into cancer therapy". Nature Reviews. Clinical Oncology 17 (11): 675–686. November 2020. doi:10.1038/s41571-020-0411-1. PMID 32699310. 
  5. 5.0 5.1 "Antibiotic collateral sensitivity is contingent on the repeatability of evolution". Nature Communications 10 (1): 334. January 2019. doi:10.1038/s41467-018-08098-6. PMID 30659188. Bibcode2019NatCo..10..334N. 
  6. "Historical contingency in the evolution of antibiotic resistance after decades of relaxed selection". PLOS Biology 17 (10): e3000397. October 2019. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3000397. PMID 31644535. 
  7. "Cancer drug resistance: an evolving paradigm". Nature Reviews. Cancer 13 (10): 714–726. October 2013. doi:10.1038/nrc3599. PMID 24060863. 
  8. "Evolutionary dynamics of carcinogenesis and why targeted therapy does not work". Nature Reviews. Cancer 12 (7): 487–493. June 2012. doi:10.1038/nrc3298. PMID 22695393. 
  9. "A change of strategy in the war on cancer". Nature 459 (7246): 508–509. May 2009. doi:10.1038/459508a. PMID 19478766. Bibcode2009Natur.459..508G. 
  10. "CROSS resistance to antibiotics". Journal of the American Medical Association 148 (6): 470–471. February 1952. doi:10.1001/jama.1952.02930060052015. PMID 14888510. 
  11. Santos-Lopez, Alfonso; Marshall, Christopher W; Haas, Allison L; Turner, Caroline; Rasero, Javier; Cooper, Vaughn S (25 August 2021). "The roles of history, chance, and natural selection in the evolution of antibiotic resistance". eLife 10: e70676. doi:10.7554/eLife.70676. PMID 34431477. 
  12. "Pervasive and diverse collateral sensitivity profiles inform optimal strategies to limit antibiotic resistance". PLOS Biology 17 (10): e3000515. October 2019. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3000515. PMID 31652256. 
  13. "Identifying States of Collateral Sensitivity during the Evolution of Therapeutic Resistance in Ewing's Sarcoma". iScience 23 (7): 101293. July 2020. doi:10.1016/j.isci.2020.101293. PMID 32623338. Bibcode2020iSci...23j1293S. 
  14. "Collateral sensitivity networks reveal evolutionary instability and novel treatment strategies in ALK mutated non-small cell lung cancer". Scientific Reports 7 (1): 1232. April 2017. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-00791-8. PMID 28450729. Bibcode2017NatSR...7.1232D. 
  15. "Exploiting evolutionary steering to induce collateral drug sensitivity in cancer". Nature Communications 11 (1): 1923. April 2020. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-15596-z. PMID 32317663. Bibcode2020NatCo..11.1923A. 
  16. Iram, S. (2021). "Controlling the speed and trajectory of evolution with counterdiabatic driving". Nature Physics 17: 135–142. doi:10.1038/s41567-020-0989-3. 
  17. 17.0 17.1 "Exploiting evolutionary principles to prolong tumor control in preclinical models of breast cancer". Science Translational Medicine 8 (327): 327ra24. February 2016. doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aad7842. PMID 26912903. 
  18. "Adaptive Therapy for Metastatic Melanoma: Predictions from Patient Calibrated Mathematical Models". Cancers 13 (4): 823. February 2021. doi:10.3390/cancers13040823. PMID 33669315. 
  19. "Adaptive therapy". Cancer Research 69 (11): 4894–4903. June 2009. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-3658. PMID 19487300. 
  20. "Optimizing adaptive cancer therapy: dynamic programming and evolutionary game theory". Proceedings of the Royal Society B 287 (1925). April 2020. doi:10.1098/rspb.2019.2454. PMID 32315588. 
  21. "Optimal control to develop therapeutic strategies for metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer". JAMA Oncology 459: 67–78. December 2018. doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2018.09.022. PMID 30243754. Bibcode2018JThBi.459...67C. https://zenodo.org/record/3552683. 
  22. "Measuring competitive exclusion in non–small cell lung cancer". Science Advances 8 (26): eabm7212. July 2022. doi:10.1126/sciadv.abm7212. PMID 35776787. 
  23. "Integrating evolutionary dynamics into treatment of metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer". Nature Communications 8 (1): 1816. November 2017. doi:10.1038/s41467-017-01968-5. PMID 29180633. Bibcode2017NatCo...8.1816Z. 
  24. "Evolution-based mathematical models significantly prolong response to abiraterone in metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer and identify strategies to further improve outcomes". eLife 11. June 2022. doi:10.7554/eLife.76284. PMID 35762577. 
  25. "Fibroblasts and alectinib switch the evolutionary games played by non-small cell lung cancer.". Nature Ecology and Evolution 3 (3): 450–456. March 2019. doi:10.1038/s41559-018-0768-z. PMID 30778184. 
  26. "Exploiting evolution to treat drug resistance: combination therapy and the double bind". Mol Pharm 9 (4): 914–921. April 2012. doi:10.1021/mp200458e. PMID 22369188. 
  27. "Lessons from applied ecology: cancer control using an evolutionary double bind". Cancer Research 69 (19): 7499–7502. September 2014. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-1354. PMID 19752088. 
  28. "Eradicating Metastatic Cancer and the Eco-Evolutionary Dynamics of Anthropocene Extinctions". Cancer Research 80 (3): 613–623. February 2021. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-19-1941. PMID 31772037. 
  29. "First Strike–Second Strike Strategies in Metastatic Cancer: Lessons from the Evolutionary Dynamics of Extinction". Cancer Research 79 (13): 3174–3177. July 2019. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-19-0807. PMID 31221821. 
  30. Ibrahim, Ahmed (2022). "The conditional defector strategies can violate the most crucial supporting mechanisms of cooperation". Scientific Reports 12 (1): 15157. doi:10.1038/s41598-022-18797-2. PMID 36071078. 
  31. "The Contribution of Evolutionary Game Theory to Understanding and Treating Cancer". Dynamic Games and Applications 12 (2): 313–342. 2021. doi:10.1007/s13235-021-00397-w. PMID 35601872. 
  32. "Integrating evolutionary dynamics into treatment of metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer". Nature Communications 8 (1): 1816. November 2017. doi:10.1038/s41467-017-01968-5. PMID 29180633. Bibcode2017NatCo...8.1816Z. 
  33. "On the reporting and analysis of a cancer evolutionary adaptive dosing trial". Nature Communications 12 (1): 316. January 2021. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-20174-4. PMID 33436546. Bibcode2021NatCo..12..316M.