Biology:Translational frameshift

From HandWiki

Translational frameshifting or ribosomal frameshifting refers to an alternative process of protein translation. A protein is translated from one end of the mRNA to the other, from the 5' to the 3' end. Normally a protein is translated from a template mRNA with consecutive blocks of 3 nucleotides being read as single amino acids. However, certain organisms may exhibit a change or shift in the ribosomes frame by one or two nucleotides when translating the genetic code. This is deemed translational or ribosomal frameshifting.[1] The process can be programmed by the nucleotide sequence of the mRNA and is sometimes affected by the secondary or tertiary mRNA structure. It has been described mainly in viruses (especially retroviruses), retrotransposons and bacterial insertion elements, and also in some cellular genes.

Process overview

Proteins are translated unidirectionally by reading tri-nucleotides on the mRNA strand also known as codons. Therefore, a shift of any number of nucleotides that is not divisible by 3 in the reading frame will result in subsequent codons to be read differently.[2] This effectively changes the ribosomal reading frame. For example, the following sentence when read from the beginning makes sense to a reader:

|Start|THE CAT AND THE MAN ARE FAT ...
|Start|123 123 123 123 123 123 123 ...

However, changing the reading frame by say shifting the first reading up one letter between the T and H on the first word:

T|Start|HEC ATA NDT HEM ANA REF AT...
-|Start|123 123 123 123 123 123 12...

Now the sentence makes absolutely no sense. In the case of a translating ribosome, a frameshift can result in nonsense being created after the frameshift or a completely different protein being created after the frameshift. When referring to translational frameshifting, the latter is always implied, the former being usually a result of a point mutation such as a deletion.

Controlling mechanisms

The main distinction between frameshifts resulting from mutation and those resulting from ribosomal frameshifting is that the latter are controlled by various mechanisms found in codons. These mechanisms emerge from the fact that ribosomes do not translate proteins at a steady rate, regardless of the sequence. Certain codons take longer to translate, because there are not equal amounts of tRNA of that particular codon in the cytosol.[3] Due to this lag, there exist in small sections of codons sequences that control the rate of ribosomal frameshifting. Sections of less accessible codons that slow ribosomal transaction are known as "choke points," and sections of easily accessible codons which result in faster ribosomal transaction are "slippery sequences." Slippery sequences can potentially make the reading ribosome "slip" and skip a number of nucleotides (usually only 1) and read a completely different frame hereafter. Choke points reduce the probability of this happening.[4]

Examples

This type of frameshifting may be programmed to occur at particular recoding sites and is important in some viruses (e.g. SARS, HIV[5]) and some cellular genes (e.g. prfB a release factor). Its use is primarily for compacting more genetic information into a shorter amount of genetic material.

Frameshift elements
Type Distribution Ref.
ALIL pseudoknot Bacteria [6]
Antizyme RNA frameshifting stimulation element Invertebrates [7]
Coronavirus frameshifting stimulation element Coronavirus [8]
DnaX ribosomal frameshifting element Eukaryota, bacteria [9]
HIV Ribosomal frameshift signal Viruses
Insertion sequence IS1222 ribosomal frameshifting element Eukaryota, bacteria
Ribosomal frameshift Viruses

See also

References

  1. "The three transfer RNAs occupying the A, P and E sites on the ribosome are involved in viral programmed -1 ribosomal frameshift". Nucleic Acids Res. 35 (16): 5581–92. 2007. doi:10.1093/nar/gkm578. PMID 17704133. PMC 2018615. http://nar.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=17704133. 
  2. "Ribosomal frameshifting in decoding antizyme mRNAs from yeast and protists to humans: close to 300 cases reveal remarkable diversity despite underlying conservation". Nucleic Acids Res. 35 (6): 1842–58. 2007. doi:10.1093/nar/gkm035. PMID 17332016. PMC 1874602. http://nar.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=17332016. 
  3. de Crécy-Lagard V (2007). "Identification of genes encoding tRNA modification enzymes by comparative genomics". Meth. Enzymol.. Methods in Enzymology 425: 153–83. doi:10.1016/S0076-6879(07)25007-4. ISBN 9780123741554. PMID 17673083. PMC 3034448. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0076-6879(07)25007-4. 
  4. "Characterization of the mechanical unfolding of RNA pseudoknots". J. Mol. Biol. 375 (2): 511–28. January 2008. doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2007.05.058. PMID 18021801. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0022-2836(07)00711-5. 
  5. "Identification of a selective small-molecule ligand for HIV-1 frameshift-inducing stem-loop RNA from an 11,325 member resin bound dynamic combinatorial library". J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129 (37): 11306–7. September 2007. doi:10.1021/ja072114h. PMID 17722919. 
  6. Mazauric, H.; Licznar, P.; Prère, F.; Canal, I.; Fayet, O. (July 2008). "Apical loop-internal loop RNA pseudoknots: a new type of stimulator of -1 translational frameshifting in bacteria". J Biol Chem 283 (29): 20421–32. doi:10.1074/jbc.M802829200. PMID 18474594. http://www.jbc.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=18474594. 
  7. "Identification of a new antizyme mRNA +1 frameshifting stimulatory pseudoknot in a subset of diverse invertebrates and its apparent absence in intermediate species.". J Mol Biol 339 (3): 495–504. 2004. doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2004.03.082. PMID 15147837. 
  8. Baranov, PV; Henderson CM; Anderson CB; Gesteland RF; Atkins JF; Howard MT (2005). "Programmed ribosomal frameshifting in decoding the SARS-CoV genome". Virology 332 (2): 498–510. doi:10.1016/j.virol.2004.11.038. PMID 15680415. 
  9. Larsen, B; Gesteland RF; Atkins JF (1997). "Structural probing and mutagenic analysis of the stem-loop required for Escherichia coli dnaX ribosomal frameshifting: programmed efficiency of 50%.". J Mol Biol 271 (1): 47–60. doi:10.1006/jmbi.1997.1162. PMID 9300054. 

External links