Bird measurement

From HandWiki
Short description: Bird biometrics
Most measurement requires the use of calipers. Here the measurement of length, wing, tail, tarsus and two forms of culmen measurement are shown.

Bird measurement or bird biometrics are approaches to quantify the size of birds in scientific studies. The variation in dimensions and weights across birds is one of the fundamental sources of diversity among birds, and even Within species, dimensions may vary across populations within species, between the sexes and depending on age and condition. In order for measurements to be useful, they need to be well defined so that measurements taken are consistent and comparable with those taken by others or at other points of time. Measurements can be useful to identify species, quantify functional and ecomorphological differences, study growth, variation between geographically separated forms, identify differences between the sexes, age or otherwise characterize individuals birds. While certain measurements are regularly taken in the field to study living birds some others are applicable only to specimens in bird collections or measurable only in the laboratory. The conventions used for measurement can vary between authors and works, making comparisons of sizes a matter that needs considerable care.[1]

Methods and considerations

All measurement is prone to error, both systematic and random. The measurement of certain bird characteristics can further vary greatly depending on the method used. The total length of a bird is sometimes measured by putting a dead bird on its back and gently pressing the head so that the bill point to the tail tip can be measured. This can however vary with the degree of stretching of the neck and cannot be measured in preserved skins in bird collections. The wing length usually defined as the distance between the carpometacarpal joint and the longest primary can vary depending on whether the natural curvature of the wing is preserved or the measurement is taken on a flattened wing. The measurement can additionally vary depending on whether a flexible tape measure is used over the curve or if measured with a rigid ruler. The definition of the length of the tail can vary when some of them have elongations, forking or other modifications.[2][3] The weights of birds are even more prone to variability with their feeding and health condition and in the case of migratory species differ quite widely across seasons even for a single individual.

Despite the variations, measurements are routinely taken in taxonomic studies and in the process of bird ringing. Several of the measurements are considered quite reliable and well defined, at least in the vast majority of birds. Although field measurements are usually univariate, laboratory techniques can often make use of multivariate measurements derived from an analysis of variation and correlations of these univariate measures. These can often indicate variations more reliably.[4][5][6]

Total body length

Measuring a common kestrel electrocuted on a power line

The total length of the body (also bill-to-tail length) of a bird is usually measured from dead specimens prior to their being skinned for preservation. The measurement is made by laying the bird on its back, stretching out the neck, making the beak to point forward and measuring between the tip of the bill and the tip of the tail. This measurement is however prone to error and is rarely ever used for any comparative or other scientific study.[7]

Culmen

Measuring the culmen

The upper margin of the beak or bill is referred to as the culmen, and the measurement is taken using calipers with one jaw at the tip of the upper mandible and the other at base of the bill (at the junction with the skull, a measurement called "total culmen") or where the feathers conceal the culmen (a measurement called "exposed culmen"). In the case of birds of prey where the tip of the mandible may form a long festoon, the length of the festoon may be measured separately as well. In birds of prey the measurement is usually from the bill tip to the ceres. In some birds the distance between the back of the skull and the tip of the beak may be more suitable and less prone to variation resulting from the difficulty of interpreting the feathered base of the mandible.[8]

Head

In some cases it is more reliable to measure the distance between the back of the skull and the tip of the bill. This measure is then termed as the head. This measurement is however not suitable for use with living birds that have strong neck musculature such as the cormorants.[7]

Tarsus

thumb|140px|Tarsus The shank of the bird is usually exposed and the length from the inner bend of the tibiotarsal articulation to the base of the toes which is often marked by a difference in the scalation is used as a standard measure. In most cases the tarsus is held bent but in some cases the measurement may be made of the length of this bone as visible on the outer side of the bend to the base of the toes.

Foot

In the case of cranes and bustards, the length of the tarsus is often measured along with the length of the longest toe to the tip of the claw.[7]

Tail

The measurement of the tail is taken from the base of the tail to the tip of the longest feathers. In the case where special structures such as racquets or streamers exist, these are separately measured. In some cases the difference between the longest and shortest feathers, that is the depth of the fork or notch can also be of use.

Wing

Measuring the wing

The wing is usually measured from the carpal joint (the bend of the wing) to the tip of the longest primary feathers. Often the wings and feathers may be flattened so that the measure is maximized but in many cases the chord length with natural curvature is preferred.[4][5] In some cases the relative lengths of the longest primaries and the pattern of size variation among them can be important to measure. The wing width can also be measured from the carpal joint to the tip of the first secondary feather.[9]

Wingspan

The wingspan is the distance between wingtips when the wings are held outstretched. This measurement is difficult to measure in the field with live birds and is prone to variation resulting from wing posture. However, the wingspan is an important dimension in studies of bird flight.[9]

Wing area

The area of a single wing can be measured manually by tracing the outline of the wing on grid paper or using a planimeter.[10] Alternatively, the area can be obtained digitally using a photograph of the spread wing that includes a scale and then using image analysis software such as ImageJ.[9] In bird flight aerodynamics, the area of interest is the total wing area, that is, the area of both wings plus the area of the intervening portion of the body known as the "root box".[10] The root box is estimated from a measurement of the wing width at the base (the root chord) and the difference between the wingspan and two times the extent of a single wing.[10] Alternatively, the total wing area can be estimated using the wingspan, wing length and wing width, and assuming simple geometric figures for the shape of the wings.[11]

Weight

The total body weight is an important biological measurement, usually used as a proxy for body mass. However, due to its variability with seasons and body condition, it is not recommended to be used as an indicator of body size. It is however useful in quantifying growth in laboratory conditions and for use in clinical diagnostics as an indicator of physiological conditions, and it is a fundamental quantity in bird aerodynamics.[9] Birds in captivity are often heavier than wild specimens. Migratory birds gain weight prior to the migratory period but lose weight during handling or temporary captivity. Dead birds tend to weigh less than in life. Even during the course of a day, the weight can vary by 5 to 10%. The male emperor penguin loses 40% of its weight during the course of incubation.[12]

References

  1. Baldwin, S. Prentiss; Oberholser, Harry C.; Worley, Leonard G. (1931). "Measurements of birds". Scientific Publications of the Cleveland Museum of Natural History 2: 1–165. https://archive.org/details/measurementsofbi00bald. 
  2. Morgan J.H. (2004). "Remarks on the taking and recording of biometric measurements in bird ringing". Ring 26 (1): 71–78. doi:10.2478/v10050-008-0058-2. http://thering.ug.edu.pl/pdf/26-1/morgan.pdf. 
  3. Goodenough AE; Stafford R; Catlin-Groves CL; Smith AL; Hart AG (2010). "Within- and among-observer variation in measurements of animal biometrics and their influence on accurate quantification of common biometric-based condition indices". Ann. Zool. Fennici 47: 323–334. doi:10.5735/086.047.0503. http://www.sekj.org/PDF/anz47-free/anz47-323.pdf. 
  4. 4.0 4.1 Bergtold, WH (1925). "The Relative Value of Bird Measurements". The Condor 27 (2): 59–61. doi:10.2307/1363054. http://sora.unm.edu/sites/default/files/journals/condor/v027n02/p0059-p0061.pdf. 
  5. 5.0 5.1 Rising, JD; KM Somers. "The measurement of overall body size in birds". The Auk 106 (4): 666–674. http://sora.unm.edu/sites/default/files/journals/auk/v106n04/p0666-p0674.pdf. 
  6. "Measurement Error of External and skeletal variables in birds and its effect on principal components". The Auk 108 (2): 432–436. 1991. http://sora.unm.edu/sites/default/files/journals/auk/v108n02/p0432-p0436.pdf. 
  7. 7.0 7.1 7.2 Birds of South Asia. The Ripley Guide. Volume 2. Washington DC & Barcelona: Smithsonian Institution & Lynx Edicions. 2005. pp. 18–19. 
  8. "What do different bill measures measure and what is the best method to use in granivorous birds?". J. Field Ornithol. 71 (4): 606–611. 
  9. 9.0 9.1 9.2 9.3 Claramunt, S.; Wright, N. A. (2017). "Using museum specimens to study flight and dispersal.". in Webster, M. S.. Emerging Frontiers in Collections-based Ornithological research: the Extended Specimen. Studies in Avian Biology 50. CRC Press. pp. 127–141. ISBN 9781315120454. 
  10. 10.0 10.1 10.2 Pennycuick, Colin J (2008). "Modelling the Flying Bird". Theoretical Ecology Series. doi:10.1016/s1875-306x(08)x0002-4. ISSN 1875-306X. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1875-306x(08)x0002-4. 
  11. Fu, HY; Su, M; Chu, JJ; Margaritescu, A; Claramunt, S (2023). "New methods for estimating the total wing area of birds" (in en). Ecology and Evolution 13 (9). doi:10.1002/ece3.10480. PMC 10474823. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ece3.10480. 
  12. George A. Clark, Jr. (1979). "Body Weights of Birds: A Review". The Condor 81 (2): 193–202. doi:10.2307/1367288. http://sora.unm.edu/sites/default/files/journals/condor/v081n02/p0193-p0202.pdf. 

External links