Chemistry:Barfoed's test

From HandWiki
Barfoed's test
ClassificationColorimetric method
AnalytesMonosaccharides

Barfoed's test is a chemical test used for detecting the presence of monosaccharides. It is based on the reduction of copper(II) acetate to copper(I) oxide (Cu2O), which forms a brick-red precipitate.[1][2]

RCHO + 2Cu2+ + 2H2O → RCOOH + Cu2O↓ + 4H+

(Disaccharides may also react, but the reaction is much slower.) The aldehyde group of the monosaccharide which normally forms a cyclic hemiacetal is oxidized to the carboxylate. A number of other substances, including sodium chloride,[3] may interfere.

It was invented by Danish chemist Christen Thomsen Barfoed[1] and is primarily used in botany.[citation needed]

The test is similar to the reaction of Fehling's solution to aldehydes.

Composition

Barfoed's reagent consists of a 0.33 molar solution of neutral copper (II) acetate[clarification needed] in 1% acetic acid solution. The reagent does not keep well and it is therefore advisable to make it up when it is actually required.[4]

Procedure

2-3 drops of Barfoed's reagent is added to 1 mL of given sample in a test tube and boiled for 30 seconds and then allowed to cool. If a red precipitate occurs, a monosaccharide is present.

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 C. Barfoed (1873). "Über die Nachweisung des Traubenzuckers neben Dextrin und verwandten Körpern". Fresenius' Zeitschrift für Analytische Chemie 12 (1): 27. doi:10.1007/BF01462957. https://zenodo.org/record/1594255. 
  2. Biochemistry Department. "Colorimetric Identification of Unknown Sugars". Biochemistry Laboratory 353. Smith College. Archived from the original on 2006-07-16. https://web.archive.org/web/20060716052807/http://www.science.smith.edu/departments/Biochem/Biochem_353/CARBO.html. 
  3. William H. Welker (1915). "A Disturbing Factor in Barfoed's Test". J. Am. Chem. Soc. 37 (9): 2227–2230. doi:10.1021/ja02174a036. https://zenodo.org/record/1428983. 
  4. Bowen, Graham and Williams (1957). A Students' Handbook of Organic Qualitative Analysis. University of London Press. p. 73.