de Bruijn–Newman constant
The de Bruijn–Newman constant, denoted by and named after Nicolaas Govert de Bruijn and Charles Michael Newman, is a mathematical constant defined via the zeros of a certain function , where is a real parameter and is a complex variable. More precisely,
- ,
where is the super-exponentially decaying function
and is the unique real number with the property that has only real zeros if and only if .
The constant is closely connected to the Riemann hypothesis. Indeed, the Riemann hypothesis is equivalent to the statement that .[1] Brad Rodgers and Terence Tao proved that , so the Riemann hypothesis is equivalent to .[2] A simplified proof of the Rodgers–Tao result was later given by Alexander Dobner.[3]
History
De Bruijn showed in 1950 that has only real zeros if , and moreover, that if has only real zeros for some , also has only real zeros if is replaced by any larger value.[4] Newman proved in 1976 the existence of a constant for which the "if and only if" claim holds; and this then implies that is unique. Newman also conjectured that ,[5] which was proven forty years later, by Brad Rodgers and Terence Tao in 2018.
Heat-flow interpretation
The family may be viewed as a deformation of the Riemann xi function under a heat-type equation. At , the function is essentially the Riemann xi function, written as an even Fourier transform. Varying multiplies the Fourier-side kernel by . Differentiating under the integral sign gives
so that increasing evolves by the backward heat equation in the variable .[6][2]
In this interpretation, the de Bruijn–Newman constant is the transition time at which the deformation changes from having non-real zeros to having only real zeros. De Bruijn's theorem says that once all zeros have become real, they remain real for all later values of the heat-flow parameter. Thus measures the stability of the real-zero property under this deformation: the Riemann hypothesis is the assertion that the undeformed function already lies on the real-zero side of the transition, while Newman's conjecture asserts that it lies exactly at the boundary rather than safely inside it.[4][2]
Proofs of Newman's conjecture
Newman's conjecture is the assertion that . The proof of this lower bound by Brad Rodgers and Terence Tao proceeds by contradiction. Assuming , they analyze the motion of the zeros of under the backwards heat-flow deformation. Their analysis forces increasingly rigid control of the zeros in the range . In particular, they prove that it implies that the zeros of would have to be locally close to equally spaced. They then derive a contradiction with known results on the local distribution of zeros of the Riemann zeta function, such as estimates related to Montgomery's pair correlation work.[2]
A different proof was later given by Alexander Dobner. Dobner's method avoids the zero-dynamics and zeta-zero gap estimates used by Rodgers and Tao. In the case of the Riemann xi function, the argument shows that for every , the deformed function can be approximated by a Dirichlet series
whose zeros imply the existence of zeros of off the critical line, equivalently non-real zeros of the corresponding , where the relationship is given by
Dobner's proof also gives a generalized form of Newman's conjecture for -functions in the extended Selberg class.[7]
Upper bounds
De Bruijn's upper bound of was not improved until 2008, when Ki, Kim and Lee proved , making the inequality strict.[8]
In December 2018, the 15th Polymath project improved the bound to .[9][10][11] A manuscript of the Polymath work was submitted to arXiv in late April 2019,[12] and was published in the journal Research In the Mathematical Sciences in August 2019.[6]
This bound was further slightly improved in April 2020 by Platt and Trudgian to .[13]
Historical bounds
| Year | Lower bound on Λ |
|---|---|
| 1987 | −50[14] |
| 1990 | −5[15] |
| 1991 | −0.0991[16] |
| 2011 | −1.1×10−11[17] |
| 2018 | 0[2] |
References
- ↑ "The De Bruijn-Newman constant is non-negative". 19 January 2018. https://terrytao.wordpress.com/2018/01/19/the-de-bruijn-newman-constant-is-non-negativ/. (announcement post)
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 Rodgers, Brad; Tao, Terence (2020). "The de Bruijn–Newman Constant is Non-Negative" (in en). Forum of Mathematics, Pi 8. doi:10.1017/fmp.2020.6. ISSN 2050-5086.
- ↑ Dobner, Alexander (2020). "A New Proof of Newman's Conjecture and a Generalization". arXiv:2005.05142 [math.NT].
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 4.2 de Bruijn, N.G. (1950). "The Roots of Triginometric Integrals". Duke Math. J. 17 (3): 197–226. doi:10.1215/s0012-7094-50-01720-0. https://pure.tue.nl/ws/files/1769368/597490.pdf.
- ↑ Newman, C.M. (1976). "Fourier Transforms with only Real Zeros". Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 61 (2): 245–251. doi:10.1090/s0002-9939-1976-0434982-5.
- ↑ 6.0 6.1 Polymath, D.H.J. (2019), "Effective approximation of heat flow evolution of the Riemann ξ function, and a new upper bound for the de Bruijn-Newman constant", Research in the Mathematical Sciences 6 (3), doi:10.1007/s40687-019-0193-1, Bibcode: 2019arXiv190412438P
- ↑ Dobner, Alexander (2021). "A proof of Newman's conjecture for the extended Selberg class". Acta Arithmetica 201: 29–62. doi:10.4064/aa200603-23-7.
- ↑ 8.0 8.1 Ki, Haseo; Kim, Young-One; Lee, Jungseob (2009), "On the de Bruijn–Newman constant", Advances in Mathematics 222 (1): 281–306, doi:10.1016/j.aim.2009.04.003, ISSN 0001-8708, http://web.yonsei.ac.kr/haseo/p23-reprint.pdf, retrieved 2018-03-03 (discussion).
- ↑ 9.0 9.1 D.H.J. Polymath (20 December 2018), Effective approximation of heat flow evolution of the Riemann -function, and an upper bound for the de Bruijn-Newman constant, https://github.com/km-git-acc/dbn_upper_bound/blob/master/Writeup/debruijn.pdf, retrieved 23 December 2018
- ↑ Going below , 4 May 2018, https://terrytao.wordpress.com/2018/05/04/polymath15-ninth-thread-going-below-0-22/
- ↑ Zero-free regions, http://michaelnielsen.org/polymath1/index.php?title=Zero-free_regions
- ↑ Polymath, D.H.J. (2019). "Effective approximation of heat flow evolution of the Riemann ξ function, and a new upper bound for the de Bruijn-Newman constant". arXiv:1904.12438 [math.NT].(preprint)
- ↑ 13.0 13.1 Platt, Dave; Trudgian, Tim (2021). "The Riemann hypothesis is true up to 3·1012". Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society 53 (3): 792–797. doi:10.1112/blms.12460.(preprint)
- ↑ Csordas, G.; Norfolk, T. S.; Varga, R. S. (1987-09-01). "A low bound for the de Bruijn-newman constant Λ" (in en). Numerische Mathematik 52 (5): 483–497. doi:10.1007/BF01400887. ISSN 0945-3245.
- ↑ te Riele, H. J. J. (1990-12-01). "A new lower bound for the de Bruijn-Newman constant" (in en). Numerische Mathematik 58 (1): 661–667. doi:10.1007/BF01385647. ISSN 0945-3245.
- ↑ Csordas, G.; Ruttan, A.; Varga, R. S. (1991-06-01). "The Laguerre inequalities with applications to a problem associated with the Riemann hypothesis" (in en). Numerical Algorithms 1 (2): 305–329. doi:10.1007/BF02142328. ISSN 1572-9265. Bibcode: 1991NuAlg...1..305C.
- ↑ Saouter, Yannick; Gourdon, Xavier; Demichel, Patrick (2011). "An improved lower bound for the de Bruijn–Newman constant". Mathematics of Computation 80 (276): 2281–2287. doi:10.1090/S0025-5718-2011-02472-5.
External links
- Weisstein, Eric W.. "de Bruijn–Newman Constant". http://mathworld.wolfram.com/deBruijn-NewmanConstant.html.
