Dehornoy order

From HandWiki

In the mathematical area of braid theory, the Dehornoy order is a left-invariant total order on the braid group, found by Patrick Dehornoy.[1][2] Dehornoy's original discovery of the order on the braid group used huge cardinals, but there are now several more elementary constructions of it.[3]

Definition

Suppose that σ1,,σn1 are the usual generators of the braid group Bn on n strings. Define a σi-positive word to be a braid that admits at least one expression in the elements σ1,,σn1 and their inverses, such that the word contains σi, but does not contain σi1 nor σj±1 for j<i.

The set P of positive elements in the Dehornoy order is defined to be the elements that can be written as a σi-positive word for some i. We have:

  • PPP;
  • P,{1} and P1 are disjoint ("acyclicity property");
  • the braid group is the union of P,{1} and P1 ("comparison property").

These properties imply that if we define a<b as a1bP then we get a left-invariant total order on the braid group. For example, σ1<σ2σ1 because the braid word σ11σ2σ1 is not σ1-positive, but, by the braid relations, it is equivalent to the σ1-positive word σ2σ1σ21, which lies in P.

History

Set theory introduces the hypothetical existence of various "hyper-infinity" notions such as large cardinals. In 1989, it was proved that one such notion, axiom I3, implies the existence of an algebraic structure called an acyclic shelf which in turn implies the decidability of the word problem for the left self-distributivity law LD:x(yz)=(xy)(xz), a property that is a priori unconnected with large cardinals.[4][5]

In 1992, Dehornoy produced an example of an acyclic shelf by introducing a certain groupoid 𝒢LD that captures the geometrical aspects of the LD law. As a result, an acyclic shelf was constructed on the braid group B, which happens to be a quotient of 𝒢LD, and this implies the existence of the braid order directly.[2] Since the braid order appears precisely when the large cardinal assumption is eliminated, the link between the braid order and the acyclic shelf was only evident via the original problem from set theory.[6]

Properties

  • The existence of the order shows that every braid group Bn is an orderable group and that, consequently, the algebras Bn and Bn have no zero-divisor.
  • For n3, the Dehornoy order is not invariant on the right: we have σ2<σ1 and σ2σ1>σ12. In fact no order of Bn with n3 may be invariant on both sides.
  • For n3, the Dehornoy order is neither Archimedean, nor Conradian: there exist braids β1,β2 satisfying β1p<β2 for every p (for instance β1=σ2 and β2=σ1), and braids β1,β2 greater than 1 satisfying β1>β2β1p for every p (for instance, β1=σ21σ1 and β2=σ22σ1).
  • The Dehornoy order is a well-ordering when restricted to the positive braid monoid Bn+ generated by σ1,,σn1.[7] The order type of the Dehornoy order restricted to Bn+ is the ordinal ωωn2.[8]
  • The Dehornoy order is also a well-ordering when restricted to the dual positive braid monoid Bn*+ generated by the elements σiσj1σjσj11σi1 with 1i<jn, and the order type of the Dehornoy order restricted to Bn*+ is also ωωn2.[9]
  • As a binary relation, the Dehornoy order is decidable. The best decision algorithm is based on Dynnikov's tropical formulas,[10] see Chapter XII of;[3] the resulting algorithm admits a uniform complexity O(2).

Connection with knot theory

  • Let Δn be Garside's fundamental half-turn braid. Every braid β lies in a unique interval [Δn2m,Δn2m+2); call the integer m the Dehornoy floor of β, denoted β. Then the link closure of braids with a large floor behave nicely, namely the properties of β^ can be read easily from β. Here are some examples.
  • If |β|>1 then β^ is prime, non-split, and non-trivial.[11]
  • If |β|>1 and β^ is a knot, then β^ is a toric knot if and only if β is periodic, β^ is a satellite knot if and only if β is reducible, and β^ is hyperbolic if and only if β is pseudo-Anosov.[12]

References

  1. Dehornoy, Patrick (1992), "Deux propriétés des groupes de tresses", Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences, Série I 315 (6): 633–638, ISSN 0764-4442 
  2. 2.0 2.1 Dehornoy, Patrick (1994), "Braid groups and left distributive operations", Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 345 (1): 115–150, doi:10.2307/2154598 
  3. 3.0 3.1 Dehornoy, Patrick; Dynnikov, Ivan; Rolfsen, Dale; Wiest, Bert (2008), Ordering braids, Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, 148, Providence, R.I.: American Mathematical Society, ISBN 978-0-8218-4431-1, https://books.google.com/books?id=St68wblwRlEC 
  4. Dehornoy, Patrick (1989), "Sur la structure des gerbes libres", Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences, Série I 309 (3): 143–148 
  5. Laver, Richard (1992), "The left distributive law and the freeness of an algebra of elementary embeddings", Advances in Mathematics 91 (2): 209–231, doi:10.1016/0001-8708(92)90016-E 
  6. Dehornoy, Patrick (1996), "Another use of set theory", Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 2 (4): 379–391, doi:10.2307/421170 
  7. Laver, Richard (1996), "Braid group actions on left distributive structures, and well orderings in the braid groups", Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra 108: 81–98, doi:10.1016/0022-4049(95)00147-6 
  8. Burckel, Serge (1997), "The wellordering on positive braids", Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra 120 (1): 1–17, doi:10.1016/S0022-4049(96)00072-2 
  9. Fromentin, Jean (2011), "Every braid admits a short sigma-definite expression", Journal of the European Mathematical Society 13 (6): 1591–1631, doi:10.4171/JEMS/289 
  10. Dynnikov, Ivan (2002), "On a Yang-Baxter mapping and the Dehornoy ordering", Russian Mathematical Surveys 57 (3): 151–152, doi:10.1070/RM2002v057n03ABEH000519 
  11. Malyutin, Andrei; Netsvetaev, Nikita Yu. (2003), "Dehornoy order in the braid group and transformations of closed braids", Rossiĭskaya Akademiya Nauk. Algebra i Analiz 15 (3): 170–187, doi:10.1090/S1061-0022-04-00816-7 
  12. Ito, Tetsuya (2011), "Braid ordering and knot genus", Journal of Knot Theory and Its Ramifications 20 (9): 1311–1323, doi:10.1142/S0218216511009169 

Further reading