Engineering:Chrome plating

From HandWiki
Short description: Technique of electroplating


Decorative chrome plating on a motorcycle

Chrome plating (less commonly chromium plating) is a technique of electroplating a thin layer of chromium onto a metal object. A chrome plated part is called chrome, or is said to have been chromed. The chromium layer can be decorative, provide corrosion resistance, facilitate cleaning, or increase surface hardness. Sometimes, a less expensive substitute for chrome such as nickel may be used for aesthetic purposes.

Chromium compounds used in electroplating are toxic. In most countries, their disposal is tightly regulated. Some fume suppressants used to control the emission of airborne chromium from plating baths are also toxic, making disposal even more difficult.

Process

The preparation and chrome plating of a part typically includes some or all of these steps:

  • Surface preparation
  • Manual cleaning to remove dirt and surface impurities
  • Removal of remaining organic contaminants using emulsion cleaning, alkaline cleaning, anodic electrocleaning, or solvent cleaning by immersion, spray, manual application, or vapor condensation[1]
  • Rinsing
  • Activation or electroetching
  • Rinsing (not necessary if the activation and plating steps are done in the same bath)
  • Immersion in the chrome plating bath, where the part is allowed to warm to solution temperature
  • Application of plating current for the required time to attain the desired thickness
  • Rinsing

There are many variations to this process, depending on the type of substrate being plated. Different substrates need different etching solutions, such as hydrochloric, hydrofluoric, and sulfuric acids. Ferric chloride is also popular for the etching of nimonic alloys. Sometimes the component enters the chrome plating vat while electrically live. Sometimes the component has a conforming anode made from lead/tin or platinized titanium. A typical hard chrome vat plates at about 0.001 inches (25 μm) per hour.

Some common industry specifications governing the chrome plating process are AMS 2460, AMS 2406, and MIL-STD-1501.

Hexavalent chromium

Hexavalent chromium plating, also known as hex-chrome, Cr6+, and chrome (VI) plating, uses chromium trioxide (CrO3, also known as chromic anhydride) as the main ingredient. Hexavalent chromium plating solution is used for both decorative and hard plating, as well as bright dipping of copper alloys, chromic acid anodizing, and chromate conversion coating.[2]

A typical hexavalent chromium plating process is:

  1. Activation bath
  2. Chromium bath
  3. Rinse
  4. Second rinse

The activation bath is typically a tank of chromic acid with a reverse current run through it. This etches the work-piece surface and removes any scale. In some cases, the activation step is done in the chromium bath. The chromium bath is a mixture of chromium trioxide and sulfuric acid, the ratio of which varies greatly between 75:1 to 250:1 by weight. This results in an extremely acidic bath (pH 0). The temperature and current density in the bath affect the brightness and final coverage. For decorative coating the temperature ranges from 35 to 45 °C (100 to 110 °F), but for hard coating it ranges from 50 to 65 °C (120 to 150 °F). Temperature is also dependent on the current density, because a higher current density requires a higher temperature. Finally, the whole bath is agitated to keep the temperature steady and achieve a uniform deposition.[2]

Disadvantages

One functional disadvantage of hexavalent chromium plating is low cathode efficiency, which results in bad throwing power. This means it leaves a non-uniform coating, with more on edges and less in inside corners and holes. To overcome this problem the part may be over-plated and ground to size, or auxiliary anodes may be used around the hard-to-plate areas.[2] Hexavalent chromium is also considerably more toxic than trivalent chromium, rendering it a major health risk both in manufacturing and disposal if not handled with care.[3]

Trivalent chromium

Trivalent chromium plating, also known as tri-chrome, Cr3+, and chrome (III) plating, uses chromium sulfate or chromium chloride as the main ingredient. Trivalent chromium plating is an alternative to hexavalent chromium in certain applications and thicknesses (e.g. decorative plating).[2]

A trivalent chromium plating process is similar to the hexavalent chromium plating process, except for the bath chemistry and anode composition. There are three main types of trivalent chromium bath configurations:[2]

  • A chloride- or sulfate-based electrolyte bath using graphite or composite anodes, plus additives to prevent the oxidation of trivalent chromium to the anodes.
  • A sulfate-based bath that uses lead anodes surrounded by boxes filled with sulfuric acid (known as shielded anodes), which keeps the trivalent chromium from oxidizing at the anodes.
  • A sulfate-based bath that uses insoluble catalytic anodes, which maintains an electrode potential that prevents oxidation.

The trivalent chromium-plating process can plate the workpieces at a similar temperature, rate and hardness, as compared to hexavalent chromium. Plating thickness ranges from 5 to 50 μin (0.13 to 1.27 μm).[2]

Advantages and disadvantages

The functional advantages of trivalent chromium are higher cathode efficiency and better throwing power. Better throwing power means better production rates. Less energy is required because of the lower current densities required. The process is more robust than hexavalent chromium because it can withstand current interruptions.[2]

One of the disadvantages when the process was first introduced was that decorative customers disapproved of the color differences. Companies now use additives to adjust the color. In hard coating applications, the corrosion resistance of thicker coatings is not quite as good as it is with hexavalent chromium. The cost of the chemicals is greater, but this is usually offset by greater production rates and lower overhead costs. In general, the process must be controlled more closely than in hexavalent chromium plating, especially with respect to metallic impurities. This means processes that are hard to control, such as barrel plating, are much more difficult using a trivalent chromium bath.[2]

Divalent chromium

Divalent chromium plating is done from liquids comprising Cr2+ species. Such solutions were avoided prior to ca. 2020, because of air-sensitivity and hydrogen evolution from aqueous Cr2+ solutions. In the 2020s, it was discovered that CrCl2 has ca. 4.0 M solubility in water at room temperature (i.e. with H2O:Cr molar ratio around 14:1), and such liquids behave like supersaturated electrolytes with a reduced propensity toward hydrogen evolution. The best quality bright deposits are produced at relatively high current density of 20 mA/cm2.[4]

Types

Decorative

Art Deco portfolio with chrome-plated cover, ca 1925


Hard

Hard chrome plating

Modern engineered coatings do not suffer such drawbacks, which often price hard chrome out due to labor costs alone. Hard chrome replacement technologies outperform hard chrome in wear resistance, corrosion resistance, and cost. Hardness up to 80 HRC is not extraordinary for such materials. Modern engineered coatings applied using spray deposition can form layers of uniform thickness that often require no further polishing or machining. These coatings are often composites of polymers, metals, and ceramic powders or fibers as proprietary formulas protected by patents or as trade secrets, and thus are usually known by brand names.[5]

Hard chromium plating is subject to different types of quality requirements depending on the application; for instance, the plating on hydraulic piston rods are tested for corrosion resistance with a salt spray test.[citation needed]

Automotive use

Most bright decorative items affixed to cars are referred to as "chrome", meaning steel that has undergone several plating processes to endure the temperature changes and weather that a car is subject to outdoors. However, the term passed on to cover any similar-looking shiny decorative auto parts, including silver plastic trim pieces in casual terminology. Triple plating is the most expensive and durable process, which involves plating the steel first with copper and then nickel before the chromium plating is applied.

Prior to the application of chrome in the 1920s, nickel electroplating was used. In the short production run prior to the US entry into the Second World War, the government banned plating to save chromium and automobile manufacturers painted the decorative pieces in a complementary color. In the last years of the Korean War, the US contemplated banning chrome in favor of several cheaper processes (such as plating with zinc and then coating with shiny plastic).

In 2007, a Restriction of Hazardous Substances Directive (RoHS) was issued banning several toxic substances for use in the automotive industry in Europe, including hexavalent chromium, which is used in chrome plating. However, chrome plating is metal and contains no hexavalent chromium after it is rinsed, so chrome plating is not banned.

Arms use

Chrome-lining protects the barrel or chamber of arms from corrosion and makes these parts also easier to clean, but this is not the main purpose for lining a barrel or chamber. Chrome-lining was introduced in machine guns to increase the wear resistance and service life of highly stressed arms parts like barrels and chambers, allowing more rounds to be fired before a barrel is worn and needs to be replaced. The end of the chamber, freebore and leade (the unrifled portion of the barrel just forward of the chamber), as well as the first few centimeters or few inches of rifling, in rifles are subject to very high temperatures — as the energy content of rifle propellants can exceed 3500 kJ/kg — and pressures that can exceed 380 MPa (55,114 psi). The propellant gases act similarly as the flame from a cutting torch, the gases heating up the metal to red-hot state and the velocity tearing away metal. Under slow fire conditions, the affected areas are able to cool sufficiently in between shots. Under sustained rapid fire or automatic/cyclic fire there is no time for the heat to dissipate. The heat and pressure effects exerted by the hot propellant gasses and friction by the projectile can quickly cause damage by washing away metal at the end of the chamber, freebore, leade and rifling. Hard chrome-lining protects the chamber, freebore, leade and rifling with a thin coat of wear resistant chrome. This significantly extends barrel life in arms that are fired for prolonged periods in full-auto or sustained rapid fire modes. Some arms manufacturers use Stellite-lining alloy as an alternative to hard chrome-lining to further increase the wear resistance and service life of highly stressed arms parts.[6][7]

Health and environmental concerns

Hexavalent chromium is the most toxic form of chromium. In the U.S., the Environmental Protection Agency regulates it heavily. The EPA lists hexavalent chromium as a hazardous air pollutant because it is a human carcinogen, a "priority pollutant" under the Clean Water Act, and a "hazardous constituent" under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act. Due to its low cathodic efficiency and high solution viscosity, a toxic mist of water and hexavalent chromium is released from the bath. Wet scrubbers are used to control these emissions. The liquid from the wet scrubbers is treated to precipitate the chromium and remove it from the wastewater before it is discharged.[2]

Additional toxic waste created from hexavalent chromium baths include lead chromates, which form in the bath because lead anodes are used. Barium is also used to control the sulfate concentration, which leads to the formation of barium sulfate (BaSO4).[2]

Trivalent chromium is intrinsically less toxic than hexavalent chromium. Because of the lower toxicity it is not regulated as strictly, which reduces overhead costs. Other health advantages include higher cathode efficiencies, which lead to less chromium air emissions; lower concentration levels, resulting in less chromium waste and anodes that do not decompose.[2]

Maintaining a bath surface tension less than 35 dyn/cm is necessary to prevent plating solution from becoming airborne when bubbles rise to the surface and pop. This requires a frequent cycle of treating the bath with a wetting agent fume suppressant and confirming the effect on surface tension.[8] Usually, surface tension is measured with a stalagmometer or tensiometer. This method is, however, tedious and suffers from inaccuracy (errors up to 22 dyn/cm have been reported), and is dependent on the user's experience and capabilities.[9]

While they are effective for the control of toxic airborne chromium, many widely used wetting agent fume suppressants are toxic themselves because they contain perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), which are hazardous chemicals that can cause long-term health effects.[10] This makes electroplating one of the jobs with the highest risk of occupational exposure to PFAS, but not as high as firefighters using fluorinated aqueous film forming foams.[11] In addition to their detrimental effects on human health, PFAS are persistent pollutants that cause significant bioaccumulation and biomagnification, putting animals at the highest trophic level at the highest risk for toxic effects.[12]

Mechanism of chromium electroplating

It has been known for over a century, that chromium electroplating is relatively easy from (di)chromate solutions, but difficult from Cr3+ solutions. Several theories have been proposed to explain this finding.

An earlier view suggested, that an active Cr3+ species (perhaps, with a ligand rather than water) forms initially from electroreduced Cr6+.[13][14] This active Cr3+ species can be reduced into metallic chromium relatively easy. However, the "active Cr3+" also undergoes within less than 1 second a transition into "inactive Cr3+", which is believed to be a polymeric hexa-aqua complex.[15] Some complexes of Cr3+ with ligand other than water can undergo relatively fast electroreduction to metallic chromium, and they are used in chromate-free chromium plating methods.[16][17]

A different school of thought suggests, that the main problem with chromium plating from Cr3+ solution is hydrogen evolution reaction (HER), and the role of chromate is to scavenge H+ ions in a reaction that competes with H2 evolution:

Cr2O72- + 14H+ + 6e- → 2Cr3+ + 7H2O

The shine of plated chrome depends on whether microscopic cracks in the plating are visible on the surface. The dull appearance of some chrome layers is due to continuous cracks that propagate through the whole plated metal layer, while bright deposits appear in the case of small microcracks that are confined to inner depth of the deposit. This HER side-reaction mechanism seems more acceptable by the electrochemistry community at present. Methods of plating chromium from Cr3+ solutions that rely on reversed current pulses have been commercialized (allegedly, to reoxidize the H2).[18]

See also

References

  1. "MIL-S-5002D: Surface Treatments and Inorganic Coatings for Metal Surfaces of Weapons Systems". http://everyspec.com/MIL-SPECS/MIL-SPECS-MIL-S/MIL-S-5002D_8571/. 
  2. 2.00 2.01 2.02 2.03 2.04 2.05 2.06 2.07 2.08 2.09 2.10 Pollution Prevention Technology Profile Trivalent Chromium Replacements for Hexavalent Chromium Plating, Northeast Waste Management Officials’ Association, 2003-10-18, http://www.newmoa.org/prevention/p2tech/TriChromeFinal.pdf. 
  3. Surface Engineering Association. "A brief guide to the chrome plating process". https://www.sea.org.uk/blog/a-brief-guide-to-the-chrome-plating-process/. 
  4. Matsumoto et al. J. Phys. Chem. C 2022, 126, 14346−14352.https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.2c04715
  5. Vernhes, Luc (2013). "Alternatives for hard chromium plating: Nanostructured coatings for severe-service valves". Materials Chemistry and Physics 140 (2–3): 522–528. doi:10.1016/j.matchemphys.2013.03.065. 
  6. "Stellite Lined Barrels". http://www.usord.com/weapons/stellite. 
  7. "Torture Test: U.S. Ordnance MAG-58/M240 – Small Arms Defense Journal - Dan Shea - 28 February 2013". http://www.sadefensejournal.com/wp/torture-test-u-s-ordnance-mag-58m240/2/. 
  8. "Rule and Implementation Information for Chromium Electroplating| Technology Transfer Network Air Technical Web site | US EPA". http://www.epa.gov/ttn/atw/chrome/chromepg.html. 
  9. "Surface Technology Environmental Resource Center - STERC". http://www.nmfrc.org/crarchive/jan08b.cfm. 
  10. Gilchrist, Maya. "PFAS in the metal plating and finishing industry". https://www.pca.state.mn.us/sites/default/files/gp3-05.pdf. 
  11. Rotander, Anna; Kärrman, Anna; Toms, Leisa-Maree L.; Kay, Margaret; Mueller, Jochen F.; Gómez Ramos, María José (2015). "Novel Fluorinated Surfactants Tentatively Identified in Firefighters Using Liquid Chromatography Quadrupole Time-of-Flight Tandem Mass Spectrometry and a Case-Control Approach". Environmental Science & Technology 49 (4): 2434–2442. doi:10.1021/es503653n. ISSN 0013-936X. PMID 25611076. Bibcode2015EnST...49.2434R. 
  12. Kjølholt, Jesper; Astrup Jensen, Allan; Warming, Marlies. "Short-chain Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS)". The Danish Environmental Protection Agency. https://www2.mst.dk/Udgiv/publications/2015/05/978-87-93352-15-5.pdf. 
  13. Del Pianta, D., J. Frayret, C. Gleyzes, C. Cugnet, J. C. Dupin and I. Le Hecho (2018). "Determination of the chromium(III) reduction mechanism during chromium electroplating." Electrochimica Acta 284: 234-241; 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.07.114
  14. Stern, C. M., T. O. Jegede, V. A. Hulse and N. Elgrishi (2021). "Electrochemical reduction of Cr(vi) in water: lessons learned from fundamental studies and applications." Chemical Society Reviews 50(3): 1642-1667; 10.1039/d0cs01165g
  15. Mandich, N. V. (1997). "Chemistry & theory of chromium deposition .1. Chemistry." Plating and Surface Finishing 84(5): 108-115;
  16. Zhao, H., W. H. Liu, Q. P. Li, B. Zhang, J. G. Liu, C. W. Yan and C. M. Liu (2020). "Mechanism of Chromium Electrodeposition from Cr(III) Baths on Nickel and Chromium Electrode Surfaces." International Journal of Electrochemical Science 15(9): 8979-8989; 10.20964/2020.09.23
  17. Guillon, R., O. Dalverny, B. Fori, C. Gazeau and J. Alexis (2022). "Mechanical Behaviour of Hard Chromium Deposited from a Trivalent Chromium Bath." Coatings 12(3): 13; 10.3390/coatings12030354 Okonkwo, B. O., C. Jeong and C. Jang (2022). "Advances on Cr and Ni Electrodeposition for Industrial Applications-A Review." Coatings 12(10): 27; 10.3390/coatings12101555
  18. Taylor, E. J. and M. Inman (2020). "Looking at Patent Law: Patenting a Trivalent Chromium Plating Invention: Obviousness Rejections - Not So Obvious." Electrochemical Society Interface 29(3): 35-40; 10.1149/2.F04203if

Further reading

  • SAE AMS 2406
  • SAE AMS 2438
  • SAE AMS 2460 - Plating, Chromium

th:โครม