Engineering:Rover CityRover
| Rover CityRover | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Overview | |
| Manufacturer | Rover Group / MG Rover |
| Production | 2003–2005 |
| Assembly | Pune, Maharashtra, India |
| Designer | I.DE.A Institute[1] |
| Body and chassis | |
| Class | Supermini |
| Body style | 5-door hatchback |
| Layout | Front-engine, front-wheel-drive |
| Related | Tata Indica Tata Indigo |
| Powertrain | |
| Engine | 1.4 L I4 (petrol) |
| Transmission | 5-speed manual |
| Dimensions | |
| Wheelbase | 2,400 mm (94.5 in) |
| Length | 3,703 mm (145.8 in) |
| Width | 1,620 mm (63.8 in) |
| Height | 1,500 mm (59.1 in) |
| uk|uk|Kerb|Curb}} weight | 1,040 kg (2,293 lb) |
| Chronology | |
| Predecessor | Rover Metro |
The Rover CityRover is a supermini car that was marketed by the former British manufacturer MG Rover under the Rover marque, between 2003 and 2005. Launched in the autumn of 2003, the car was a rebadged version of the India n developed Tata Indica.[2] Its performance was considered poor for a small car in contemporary road tests, and its lack of quality, poor road handling and high price were not well received.[3]
Production of the CityRover ceased in April 2005, along with the rest of the MG Rover range, when the company fell into administration.[4]
Technical details
The CityRover was offered with only one engine: a Peugeot derived 1,405 cc (1.4 L) four cylinder, eight valve engine producing 85 bhp (63 kW; 86 PS) and 88 lb⋅ft (119 N⋅m).[5] It could accelerate to 60 mph in 11.9 seconds and had a top speed of 100 mph (160.9 km/h).[6]
The CityRover was manufactured by Tata Motors, at their factory in Pune, India.[7] Alterations for the British market included new bumpers, Rover badge grille, 14" wheels, and new suspension settings.[8]
Safety
The high driving position and large glass area afforded drivers with good all-round visibility, while the rear lamps were mounted high up on the structure so other road users could see them more prominently. All doors were fitted with anti-intrusion bars, with child locks on the rear doors.
The steering column was collapsible, and a driver-side airbag was fitted as standard to all models, with a passenger airbag standard on the top trim level and available as an option on the entry-level and midrange trims. All seats had anti-submarine ramps and three-point seatbelts, with the front getting belt pretensioners and height-adjustable head restraints. ABS was included on "style" models.[9]
Criticism
MG Rover was reported to be paying Tata £3,000 for each car and, with each model featuring a Rover corporate nose and revised suspension settings, the buying public was not impressed by the £6,495 starting price.[10]
In May 2004, Rover refused to lend a CityRover to motoring show Top Gear to test it. In order to answer the question of "just how bad could it be?" James May went undercover and test drove one at a dealer while carrying a hidden camera. May went on to say, "that is the worst car I have driven on this programme".[10]
Sales were well short of MG Rover's targets, so the CityRover was given an upgrade for the model year of 2005, with more standard equipment. In December 2004, prices were reduced by £900, confirming that the car's previous prices had not been competitive.[11]
According to car reviewer Parker's, the CityRover was the worst rated Rover car from MG Rover, with a rating of two out of five.[12] In October 2013, Top Gear Magazine placed the CityRover as number two behind the Perodua Kelisa on its list of "The thirteen worst cars of the last twenty years."[13]
References
- ↑ Aucock, Richard. "On test: Rover CityRover". MSN Motors. http://cars.uk.msn.com/reviews/articles.aspx?cp-documentid=147864374. Retrieved 29 December 2011.
- ↑ Cheetham, Craig (December 2003). "Auto Express". CityRover Sprite 1.4i. http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/carreviews/firstdrives/42274/cityrover_sprite_14i.html. Retrieved 29 December 2011.
- ↑ "Rover CityRover 1.4 Style review - living". Autocar. http://www.autocar.co.uk/CarReviews/RoadTestsLiving/Rover-CityRover-1.4-Style/206522/. Retrieved 29 December 2011.
- ↑ "CityRover (2003 - 2005) used car review". 28 October 2005. https://www.rac.co.uk/drive/car-reviews/rover/cityrover/city-2003-2005/. Retrieved 18 April 2020.
- ↑ "Rover CityRover 1.4 Style review". Autocar. 27 January 2004. http://www.autocar.co.uk/CarReviews/RoadTestsDesign/Rover-CityRover-1.4-Style/206522/. Retrieved 29 December 2011.
- ↑ "Rover CityRover 1.4 Solo 5d – Facts and Figures". Parkers. http://www.parkers.co.uk/cars/reviews/facts-and-figures/rover/cityrover/hatchback-2003/26680/. Retrieved 29 December 2011.
- ↑ "Tata Motors rolls out first CityRover". The Hindu Business Line. 16 September 2003. http://www.thehindubusinessline.in/2003/09/17/stories/2003091701420200.htm. Retrieved 29 December 2011.
- ↑ Hudson, Paul (3 January 2004). "Relax, it's a Rover". The Daily Telegraph. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/motoring/carreviews/2726367/Relax-its-a-Rover.html. Retrieved 29 December 2011.
- ↑ "City Rover Goes on Sale from £6,495". https://www.honestjohn.co.uk/news/miscellaneous/2003-11/city-rover-goes-on-sale-from-gbp6495/.
- ↑ 10.0 10.1 Marriage of convenience? Austin Rover Online
- ↑ "Rover to cut CityRover prices - What Car?". Whatcar.com. 21 December 2004. Archived from the original on 26 May 2005. https://web.archive.org/web/20050526023621/http://www.whatcar.com/News_Article.asp?NA_ID=212803. Retrieved 10 May 2009.
- ↑ http://www.parkers.co.uk/cars/reviews/rover/ Parkers car reviews - Rover
- ↑ "The 13 Worst Cars of the Last 20 Years". Top Gear magazine. 31 October 2013. http://www.topgear.com/uk/photos/The-13-worst-cars-of-the-last-20-years-2013-10-30. Retrieved 12 October 2014.
External links
 |  |
