Flag bundle

From HandWiki

Definition

Short description: Scheme parametrizing flags in the fibers of a vector bundle


In algebraic geometry, let X be a scheme, let ℰ be a vector bundle of rank n on X, and fix integers 0<d1<d2<⋯<dr<n. The flag bundle, or relative flag variety, of type (d1,…,dr) associated with ℰ is the X-scheme p:Fld1,…,dr(ℰ)⟶X whose fiber over a point x∈X is the flag variety parametrizing chains Vd1⊂Vd2⊂⋯⊂Vdr⊂ℰ(x),dimκ(x)Vdi=di, where ℰ(x)=ℰx⊗𝒪X,xκ(x) is the fiber of ℰ at x.[1]

Universal property

The flag bundle represents the functor which assigns to an X-scheme f:T→X the set of flags of subbundles 0⊂𝒮d1⊂𝒮d2⊂⋯⊂𝒮dr⊂f*ℰ, where 𝒮di has rank di. Here, a subbundle is understood to be locally a direct summand, equivalently, to have a locally free quotient.

Consequently, on Fld1,…,dr(ℰ) there is a tautological flag 0⊂𝒰d1⊂𝒰d2⊂⋯⊂𝒰dr⊂p*ℰ, with rank⁡𝒰di=di. Every family of flags over an X-scheme is obtained uniquely by pulling back this tautological flag.[2]

Some authors define flag bundles using chains of locally free quotients rather than subbundles. The two conventions are equivalent after passing to dual bundles and reversing the sequence of ranks.

Construction

Flag bundles can be constructed as iterated Grassmann bundles. Set d0=0, X0=X, and 𝒰d0=0. Suppose that Xi−1 and the universal rank-di−1 subbundle 𝒰di−1⊂ℰXi−1 have been constructed. Define Xi=Grdi−di−1(ℰXi−1/𝒰di−1). The universal subbundle of the quotient has an inverse image 𝒰di⊂ℰXi. After r steps one obtains Xr≅Fld1,…,dr(ℰ).

For the complete flag bundle, where di=i for 1≤i≤n−1, each step chooses a line in a quotient bundle. Thus, the complete flag bundle is a tower of projective bundles: Fl⁡(ℰ)⟶Fl1,…,n−2(ℰ)⟶⋯⟶𝐏(ℰ)⟶X.[1]

Basic properties

Formation of the flag bundle commutes with arbitrary base change. If g:Y→X, then there is a canonical isomorphism Fld1,…,dr(g*ℰ)≅Y×XFld1,…,dr(ℰ).

On an open subset U⊂X over which ℰ is trivial, the flag bundle is a product Fld1,…,dr(ℰ)|U≅U×Fld1,…,dr(ℤn). In particular, the morphism p is smooth and projective. Its relative dimension is ∑i=1r(di−di−1)(n−di),d0=0.[3]

Equivalently, if Fr⁡(ℰ) is the principal GLn-bundle of frames of ℰ and P⊂GLn is the parabolic subgroup stabilizing a standard flag of type (d1,…,dr), then Fld1,…,dr(ℰ)≅Fr⁡(ℰ)×GLnGLn/P.

Special cases

If X=Spec⁡k is a point, the flag bundle is the usual flag variety of a vector space. If r=1, it is the Grassmann bundle Grd1(ℰ). Under the convention that 𝐏(ℰ) parametrizes lines, the case d1=1 is the projective bundle 𝐏(ℰ).

The type (1,2,…,n−1) gives the complete flag bundle Fl⁡(ℰ); all other types are called partial flag bundles.

Sections and fixed flags

By the universal property, a section s:X⟶Fld1,…,dr(ℰ) is equivalent to a flag of subbundles 0⊂ℰd1⊂⋯⊂ℰdr⊂ℰ of the prescribed ranks. Thus, a fixed flag of subbundles is not required to define the flag bundle; rather, it gives a section of it.

A fixed flag may also be used to impose incidence or rank conditions on the tautological flag. The resulting closed subschemes are relative Schubert varieties, and their pullbacks by sections give degeneracy loci.[4]

Splitting principle

On the complete flag bundle, put 𝒰0=0 and 𝒰n=p*ℰ. The successive quotients ℒi=𝒰i/𝒰i−1,1≤i≤n, are line bundles. Hence p*ℰ has a canonical filtration with line-bundle quotients, and its total Chern class satisfies c(p*ℰ)=∏i=1n(1+c1(ℒi)). This is one geometric form of the splitting principle and is a principal application of complete flag bundles in intersection theory.[5]

See also

References

  1. ↑ 1.0 1.1 Darondeau, Lionel; Pragacz, Piotr (2017). "Universal Gysin formulas for flag bundles". International Journal of Mathematics 28 (11). doi:10.1142/S0129167X1750077X. 
  2. ↑ The Stacks Project Authors. "Grassmannians". https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/089R. 
  3. ↑ Théorie des Intersections et Théorème de Riemann-Roch. Lecture Notes in Mathematics. 225. Springer. 1971. Exposé VI, §4. doi:10.1007/BFb0066283. ISBN 978-3-540-05647-8. 
  4. ↑ Fulton, William; Pragacz, Piotr (1998). Schubert Varieties and Degeneracy Loci. Lecture Notes in Mathematics. 1689. Springer. pp. 14–25. doi:10.1007/BFb0096380. ISBN 978-3-540-64538-2. 
  5. ↑ Fulton, William (1998). Intersection Theory. Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete. 2 (2nd ed.). Springer. §3.2. doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-1700-8. ISBN 978-0-387-98549-7.