Fundamental unit (number theory)

From HandWiki

In algebraic number theory, a fundamental unit is a generator (modulo the roots of unity) for the unit group of the ring of integers of a number field, when that group has rank 1 (i.e. when the unit group modulo its torsion subgroup is infinite cyclic). Dirichlet's unit theorem shows that the unit group has rank 1 exactly when the number field is a real quadratic field, a complex cubic field, or a totally imaginary quartic field. When the unit group has rank ≥ 1, a basis of it modulo its torsion is called a fundamental system of units.[1] Some authors use the term fundamental unit to mean any element of a fundamental system of units, not restricting to the case of rank 1 (e.g. Neukirch 1999, p. 42).

Real quadratic fields

For the real quadratic field [math]\displaystyle{ K=\mathbf{Q}(\sqrt{d}) }[/math] (with d square-free), the fundamental unit ε is commonly normalized so that ε > 1 (as a real number). Then it is uniquely characterized as the minimal unit among those that are greater than 1. If Δ denotes the discriminant of K, then the fundamental unit is

[math]\displaystyle{ \varepsilon=\frac{a+b\sqrt{\Delta}}{2} }[/math]

where (ab) is the smallest solution to[2]

[math]\displaystyle{ x^2-\Delta y^2=\pm4 }[/math]

in positive integers. This equation is basically Pell's equation or the negative Pell equation and its solutions can be obtained similarly using the continued fraction expansion of [math]\displaystyle{ \sqrt{\Delta} }[/math].

Whether or not x2 − Δy2 = −4 has a solution determines whether or not the class group of K is the same as its narrow class group, or equivalently, whether or not there is a unit of norm −1 in K. This equation is known to have a solution if, and only if, the period of the continued fraction expansion of [math]\displaystyle{ \sqrt{\Delta} }[/math] is odd. A simpler relation can be obtained using congruences: if Δ is divisible by a prime that is congruent to 3 modulo 4, then K does not have a unit of norm −1. However, the converse does not hold as shown by the example d = 34.[3] In the early 1990s, Peter Stevenhagen proposed a probabilistic model that led him to a conjecture on how often the converse fails. Specifically, if D(X) is the number of real quadratic fields whose discriminant Δ < X is not divisible by a prime congruent to 3 modulo 4 and D(X) is those who have a unit of norm −1, then[4]

[math]\displaystyle{ \lim_{X\rightarrow\infty}\frac{D^-(X)}{D(X)}=1-\prod_{j\geq1\text{ odd}}\left(1-2^{-j}\right). }[/math]

In other words, the converse fails about 42% of the time. As of March 2012, a recent result towards this conjecture was provided by Étienne Fouvry and Jürgen Klüners[5] who show that the converse fails between 33% and 59% of the time. In 2022, Peter Koymans and Carlo Pagano[6] claimed a complete proof of Stevenhagen's conjecture.

Cubic fields

If K is a complex cubic field then it has a unique real embedding and the fundamental unit ε can be picked uniquely such that |ε| > 1 in this embedding. If the discriminant Δ of K satisfies |Δ| ≥ 33, then[7]

[math]\displaystyle{ \epsilon^3\gt \frac{|\Delta|-27}{4}. }[/math]

For example, the fundamental unit of [math]\displaystyle{ \mathbf{Q}(\sqrt[3]{2}) }[/math] is [math]\displaystyle{ \epsilon = 1+\sqrt[3]{2}+\sqrt[3]{2^2}, }[/math] and [math]\displaystyle{ \epsilon^3\approx 56.9 }[/math] whereas the discriminant of this field is −108 thus

[math]\displaystyle{ \frac{|\Delta|-27}{4}=20.25 }[/math]

so [math]\displaystyle{ \epsilon^3 \approx 56.9 \gt 20.25 }[/math].

Notes

  1. Alaca & Williams 2004, §13.4
  2. Neukirch 1999, Exercise I.7.1
  3. Alaca & Williams 2004, Table 11.5.4
  4. Stevenhagen 1993, Conjecture 1.4
  5. Fouvry & Klüners 2010
  6. Koymans, Peter; Pagano, Carlo (2022-01-31). "On Stevenhagen's conjecture". arXiv:2201.13424 [math.NT].
  7. Alaca & Williams 2004, Theorem 13.6.1

References

External links