GCD matrix

From HandWiki
Heatmap of GCD Matrix

In mathematics, a greatest common divisor matrix (sometimes abbreviated as GCD matrix) is a matrix that may also be referred to as Smith's matrix. The study was initiated by H.J.S. Smith (1875). A new inspiration was begun from the paper of Bourque & Ligh (1992). This led to intensive investigations on singularity and divisibility of GCD type matrices. A brief review of papers on GCD type matrices before that time is presented in (Haukkanen Wang).

Definition

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2
1 1 3 1 1 3 1 1 3 1
1 2 1 4 1 2 1 4 1 2
1 1 1 1 5 1 1 1 1 5
1 2 3 2 1 6 1 2 3 2
1 1 1 1 1 1 7 1 1 1
1 2 1 4 1 2 1 8 1 2
1 1 3 1 1 3 1 1 9 1
1 2 1 2 5 2 1 2 1 10
GCD matrix of (1,2,3,...,10)

Let S=(x1,x2,,xn) be a list of positive integers. Then the n×n matrix (S) having the greatest common divisor gcd(xi,xj) as its ij entry is referred to as the GCD matrix on S.The LCM matrix [S] is defined analogously.[1][2]

The study of GCD type matrices originates from (Smith 1875) who evaluated the determinant of certain GCD and LCM matrices. Smith showed among others that the determinant of the n×n matrix (gcd(i,j)) is ϕ(1)ϕ(2)ϕ(n), where ϕ is Euler's totient function.[3]

Bourque–Ligh conjecture

(Bourque Ligh) conjectured that the LCM matrix on a GCD-closed set S is nonsingular.[1] This conjecture was shown to be false by (Haukkanen Wang) and subsequently by (Hong 1999).[4][2] A lattice-theoretic approach is provided by (Korkee Mattila).[5]

The counterexample presented in (Haukkanen Wang) is S={1,2,3,4,5,6,10,45,180} and that in (Hong 1999) is S={1,2,3,5,36,230,825,227700}. A counterexample consisting of odd numbers is S={1,3,5,7,195,291,1407,4025,1020180525}. Its Hasse diagram is presented on the right below.

The cube-type structures of these sets with respect to the divisibility relation are explained in (Korkee Mattila).

The Hasse diagram of an odd GCD closed set whose LCM matrix is singular

Divisibility

Let S=(x1,x2,,xn) be a factor closed set. Then the GCD matrix (S) divides the LCM matrix [S] in the ring of n×n matrices over the integers, that is there is an integral matrix B such that [S]=B(S), see (Bourque Ligh). Since the matrices (S) and [S] are symmetric, we have [S]=(S)BT. Thus, divisibility from the right coincides with that from the left. We may thus use the term divisibility.

There is in the literature a large number of generalizations and analogues of this basic divisibility result.

Matrix norms

Some results on matrix norms of GCD type matrices are presented in the literature. Two basic results concern the asymptotic behaviour of the p norm of the GCD and LCM matrix on S={1,2,,n}. [6]


Given p+, the p norm of an n×n matrix A is defined as

Ap=(i=1nj=1n|aij|p)1/p.

Let S={1,2,,n}. If p2, then

(S)p=Cp1/pn1+(1/p)+O((n(1/p)pEp(n)),

where

Cp:=2ζ(p)ζ(p+1)(p+1)ζ(p+1)

and Ep(x)=xp for p>2 and E2(x)=x2logx. Further, if p1, then

[S]p=Dp1/pn2+(2/p)+O((n(2/p)+1(logn)2/3(loglogn)4/3),

where

Dp:=ζ(p+2)(p+1)2ζ(p).

Factorizations

Let f be an arithmetical function, and let S=(x1,x2,,xn) be a set of distinct positive integers. Then the matrix (S)f=(f(gcd(xi,xj)) is referred to as the GCD matrix on S associated with f. The LCM matrix [S]f on S associated with f is defined analogously. One may also use the notations (S)f=f(S) and [S]f=f[S].

Let S be a GCD-closed set. Then

(S)f=EΔET,

where E is the n×n matrix defined by

eij={1if xjxi,0otherwise

and Δ is the n×n diagonal matrix, whose diagonal elements are

δi=dxidxtxt<xi(fμ)(d).

Here is the Dirichlet convolution and μ is the Möbius function.

Further, if f is a multiplicative function and always nonzero, then

[S]f=ΛEΔETΛ,

where Λ and Δ are the n×n diagonal matrices, whose diagonal elements are λi=f(xi) and

δi=d|xidxtxt<xi(1fμ)(d).

If S is factor-closed, then δi=(fμ)(xi) and δi=(1fμ)(xi). [6]

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Bourque, K.; Ligh, S. (1992). "On GCD and LCM matrices". Linear Algebra and Its Applications 174: 65–74. doi:10.1016/0024-3795(92)90042-9. 
  2. 2.0 2.1 Hong, S. (1999). "On the Bourque–Ligh conjecture of least common multiple matrices". Journal of Algebra 218: 216–228. doi:10.1006/jabr.1998.7844. 
  3. Smith, H. J. S. (1875). "On the value of a certain arithmetical determinant". Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society 1: 208–213. doi:10.1112/plms/s1-7.1.208. https://zenodo.org/record/1709912. 
  4. Haukkanen, P.; Wang, J.; Sillanpää, J. (1997). "On Smith's determinant". Linear Algebra and Its Applications 258: 251–269. doi:10.1016/S0024-3795(96)00192-9. 
  5. Korkee, I.; Mattila, M.; Haukkanen, P. (2019). "A lattice-theoretic approach to the Bourque–Ligh conjecture". Linear and Multilinear Algebra 67 (12): 2471–2487. doi:10.1080/03081087.2018.1494695. https://trepo.tuni.fi/handle/10024/117430. 
  6. 6.0 6.1 Haukkanen, P.; Toth, L. (2018). "Inertia, positive definiteness and ℓp norm of GCD and LCM matrices and their unitary analogs". Linear Algebra and Its Applications 558: 1–24. doi:10.1016/j.laa.2018.08.022. https://trepo.tuni.fi/bitstream/10024/104222/1/Inertia_positive_definiteness_2018.pdf.