Gray-box testing

From HandWiki

Gray-box testing (International English spelling: grey-box testing) is a combination of white-box testing and black-box testing. The aim of this testing is to search for the defects, if any, due to improper structure or improper usage of applications.[1][2]

Overview

A black-box tester is unaware of the internal structure of the application to be tested, while a white-box tester has access to the internal structure of the application. A gray-box tester partially knows the internal structure, which includes access to the documentation of internal data structures as well as the algorithms used.[3]

Gray-box testers require both high-level and detailed documents describing the application, which they collect in order to define test cases.[4]

Need for gray-box testing

Gray-box testing is beneficial because it takes the straightforward technique of black-box testing and combines it with the code-targeted systems in white-box testing.

Gray-box testing is based on requirement test case generation because it presents all the conditions before the program is tested by using the assertion method. A requirement specification language is used to make it easy to understand the requirements and verify its correctness.[5]

Gray-box testing assumptions for object-oriented software

Object-oriented software consists primarily of objects; where objects are single indivisible units having executable code and/or data. Some assumptions are stated below which are needed for the application of use gray-box testing.

  • Activation of Methods[6]
  • State Reporting in Class Under Test (CUT).
  • Report Testing is inherent in Class Under Test.[5]

Examples

Techniques

Cem Kaner defines "gray-box testing as involving inputs and outputs, but test design is educated by information about the code or the program operation of a kind that would normally be out of view of the tester".[9] Gray-box testing techniques are:

  • Matrix Testing: states the status report of the project.
  • Regression testing: it implies rerunning of the test cases if new changes are made.
  • Pattern Testing: verify the good application for its design or architecture and patterns.
  • Orthogonal array testing: used as subset of all possible combination.[10]

Effects

Positive Effects

  • Offers combined benefits: As Gray-box testing is combination of white-box and black-box testing, it serves advantages from both the testings.
  • Non Intrusive: It is based on functional specification, architectural view whereas not on source code or binaries which makes it invasive too.
  • Intelligent Test Authoring: Gray-box tester handles intelligent test scenario, for example, data type handling, communication protocol, exception handling.
  • Unbiased Testing: In spite of all above advantages and functionalities, Gray-box testing maintains boundary for testing between tester and developer.[11]

Negative Effects

  • Partial code coverage: In gray-box testing, source code or binaries are missing because of limited access to internal or structure of the applications which results in limited access for code path traversal.
  • Defect Identification: In distributed applications, it is difficult to associate defect identification. Still, Gray-box testing is a boon to find how appropriate these systems throw exceptions and how fine are these exceptions handled in distributed systems having web services environment.[11][12]

Applications

  • Gray-box testing is well suited for web applications. Web applications have distributed network or systems; due to absence of source code or binaries it is not possible to use white-box testing. Black-box testing is also not used due to just contract between customer and developer, so it is more efficient to use gray-box testing as significant information is available in Web Services Description Language (WSDL).[13]
  • Gray-box testing is suited for functional or business domain testing. Functional testing is done basically a test of user interactions with may be external systems. Gray-box testing is well-suited for functional testing due to its characteristics; it also helps to confirm that software meets the requirements defined for the software.[14][15][16][17]

Future scope

The distributed nature of Web services allows gray-box testing to detect defects within a service-oriented architecture (SOA). As we know, white-box testing is not suitable for Web services as it deals directly with the internal structures. White-box testing can be used for state art methods; for example, message mutation which generates the automatic tests for large arrays to help exception handling states, flow without source code or binaries. Such a strategy is useful to push gray-box testing nearer to the outcomes of white-box testing.

See also

References

  1. "Microsoft Research – Emerging Technology, Computer, and Software Research". http://research.microsoft.com/pubs/81199/p1-kicillof.pdf. 
  2. "Archived copy". http://eastwest.inf.brad.ac.uk/document/publication/Doungsa-ard-IWS06%20.pdf. 
  3. "Gray Box Testing". Software Testing Fundamentals. 4 November 2011. http://softwaretestingfundamentals.com/gray-box-testing. 
  4. "Example of grey box testing with definition". Geekinterview.com. http://www.geekinterview.com/question_details/35806. 
  5. 5.0 5.1 Jake Rogers (8 August 2016). "Common Questions Regarding Grey-Box Testing". cgsec.co.uk. https://www.cgsec.co.uk/2016/08/09/common-questions-regarding-grey-box-testing/. [yes|permanent dead link|dead link}}]
  6. "Object-Oriented Extensions to Pascal". Pascal-central.com. http://pascal-central.com/OOE-stds.html#sect-6.5.8.2. 
  7. Patton, Ron (26 July 2005). Software Testing. Sams. p. 2. ISBN 978-0-672-32798-8. https://archive.org/details/softwaretesting0000patt/page/2. 
  8. "Archived copy". http://www.site.uottawa.ca/~ssome/Cours/SEG3203/gboxtesting.pdf. 
  9. Nguyen, Hung Q (2001). Testing Applications on the Web: Test Planning for Internet-Based Systems. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 9780471437642. 
  10. "Explore the World of Gray Box Testing". Extremesoftwaretesting.com. http://extremesoftwaretesting.com/Articles/WorldofGrayBoxTesting.html. 
  11. 11.0 11.1 "SOA Testing Tools for Black, White and Gray Box SOA Testing Techniques". Crosschecknet.com. http://www.crosschecknet.com/soa_testing_black_white_gray_box.php. 
  12. "E33 Gray Box Testing.PDF". http://www.sfisaca.org/events/conference04/presentations/E33-Gray-Box-Testing.pdf. 
  13. Ramdeo, Anand (5 May 2011). "Gray Box Testing - Software". Testing Geek. http://www.testinggeek.com/gray-box-testing. 
  14. Bach, James (31 December 2001). Lessons Learned in Software Testing. Wiley Computer Publishing. ISBN 978-0-471-08112-8. https://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0471081124/softwarqaandtest. 
  15. Falk, Jack (12 April 1999). Testing Computer Software, 2nd Edition. Wiley Computer Publishing. ISBN 978-0-471-35846-6. https://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0471358460/softwarqaandtest. 
  16. http://legacy.cleanscape.net/docs_lib/paper_graybox.pdf[bare URL PDF]
  17. Li, Z. J.; Tan, H. F.; Liu, H. H.; Zhu, J.; Mitsumori, N. M. (6 April 2010). "Business-process-driven gray-box SOA testing". IBM Systems Journal 47 (3): 457–472. doi:10.1147/sj.473.0457.