Harrop formula

From HandWiki

In intuitionistic logic, the Harrop formulae, named after Ronald Harrop, are the class of formulae inductively defined as follows:[1][2][3]

  • Atomic formulae are Harrop, including falsity (⊥);
  • A∧B is Harrop provided A and B are;
  • ¬F is Harrop for any well-formed formula F;
  • F→A is Harrop provided A is, and F is any well-formed formula;
  • ∀x.A is Harrop provided A is.

By excluding disjunction and existential quantification (except in the antecedent of implication), non-constructive predicates are avoided, which has benefits for computer implementation.

Discussion

Harrop formulae are "well-behaved" also in a constructive context. For example, in Heyting arithmetic HA, Harrop formulae satisfy a classical equivalence not generally satisfied in constructive logic:[1]

¬¬A↔A.

There are however Π1-statements that are PA-independent, meaning these are simple ∀x.A statements for which excluded middle is not HA-provable. Indeed, while intuitionistic logic proves ¬¬(P∨¬P) for any P, the disjunction will not be Harrop.

Hereditary Harrop formulae and logic programming

A more complex definition of hereditary Harrop formulae is used in logic programming as a generalisation of Horn clauses, and forms the basis for the language λProlog. Hereditary Harrop formulae are defined in terms of two (sometimes three) recursive sets of formulae. In one formulation:[4]

  • Rigid atomic formulae, i.e. constants r or formulae r(t1,...,tn), are hereditary Harrop;
  • A∧B is hereditary Harrop provided A and B are;
  • ∀x.A is hereditary Harrop provided A is;
  • G→A is hereditary Harrop provided A is rigidly atomic, and G is a G-formula.

G-formulae are defined as follows:[4]

  • Atomic formulae are G-formulae, including truth(⊤);
  • A∧B is a G-formula provided A and B are;
  • A∨B is a G-formula provided A and B are;
  • ∀x.A is a G-formula provided A is;
  • ∃x.A is a G-formula provided A is;
  • H→A is a G-formula provided A is, and H is hereditary Harrop.

History

Harrop formulae were introduced around 1956 by Ronald Harrop and independently by Helena Rasiowa.[2] Variations of the fundamental concept are used in different branches of constructive mathematics and logic programming.

See also

References

  1. ↑ 1.0 1.1 Dummett, Michael (2000). Elements of Intuitionism (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. p. 227. ISBN 0-19-850524-8. 
  2. ↑ 2.0 2.1 A. S. Troelstra; H. Schwichtenberg (27 July 2000). Basic proof theory. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-77911-1. 
  3. ↑ Ronald Harrop (1956). "On disjunctions and existential statements in intuitionistic systems of logic". Mathematische Annalen 132 (4): 347–361. doi:10.1007/BF01360048. 
  4. ↑ 4.0 4.1 Dov M. Gabbay, Christopher John Hogger, John Alan Robinson, Handbook of Logic in Artificial Intelligence and Logic Programming: Logic programming, Oxford University Press, 1998, p 575, ISBN 0-19-853792-1