Homotopy category of an ∞-category

From HandWiki

In mathematics, especially category theory, the homotopy category of an ∞-category C is the category where the objects are those in C but the hom-set from x to y is the quotient of the set of morphisms from x to y in C by an appropriate equivalence relation.

If an ∞-category is defined as a weak Kan complex (usual definition), then the construction is due to Boardman and Vogt,[1] who also gave the definition of an ∞-category as a weak Kan complex. In this case, the homotopy category of an ∞-category C is equivalent to τ(C), where τ is a left adjoint of the nerve functor.[2]

For example, the singular complex of a (reasonable) topological space X is a Kan complex and the homotopy category of it is the fundamental groupoid of X.[3]

Boardman–Vogt construction

Let C be an ∞-category. If f,g:xy are morphisms (1-simplexes) in C, then we write fg if there is a 2-simplex σ:Δ2C such that σ(01)=f,σ(02)=g,σ(12)=idy. Then by Joyal's work, the relation turns out to be an equivalence relation.[4] Hence, we can take the quotient

[x,y]=HomC(x,y)/.

Then the homotopy category τ(C) in the sense of Boardman–Vogt is the category where obj(τ(C))=obj(C), Homτ(C)(x,y)=[x,y] and the composition is given by [f][g]=[h] when h exhibits some composition of f,g.[5]

Let π0 be a left adjoint to the inclusion of the category of sets into the category of simplicial sets.[6] If K is a Kan complex, then π0K coincides with the set of simplicial homotopy classes of maps Δ0K.[7] Then

Homτ(C)(x,y)π0Map(x,y)

for each objects x,y in C.[8]

See also

  • Weak equivalence between simplicial sets

References

  1. Cisinski 2023, § 1.6.
  2. Cisinski 2023, Theorem 1.6.6.
  3. Cisinski 2023, Example 1.6.9.
  4. Cisinski 2023, Lemma 1.6.4.
  5. Cisinski 2023, § 1.6.5.
  6. Cisinski 2023, § 3.1.30.
  7. Cisinski 2023, Proposition 3.1.31.
  8. Cisinski 2023, Proposition 3.7.2.

Further reading