NLTS conjecture

From HandWiki
Short description: Quantum computational theorem on problem complexity

In quantum information theory, the no low-energy trivial state (NLTS) conjecture is a precursor to a quantum PCP theorem (qPCP) and posits the existence of families of Hamiltonians with all low-energy states of non-trivial complexity.[1][2][3][4] It was formulated by Michael Freedman and Matthew Hastings in 2013. An NLTS proof would be a consequence of one aspect of qPCP problems – the inability to certify an approximation of local Hamiltonians via NP completeness.[2] In other words, an NLTS proof would be one consequence of the QMA complexity of qPCP problems.[5] On a high level, if proved, NLTS would be one property of the non-Newtonian complexity of quantum computation.[5] NLTS and qPCP conjectures posit the near-infinite complexity involved in predicting the outcome of quantum systems with many interacting states.[6] These calculations of complexity would have implications for quantum computing such as the stability of entangled states at higher temperatures, and the occurrence of entanglement in natural systems.[7][6] There is currently a proof of NLTS conjecture published in preprint.[8]

NLTS property

The NLTS property is the underlying set of constraints that forms the basis for the NLTS conjecture.[citation needed]

Definitions

Local hamiltonians

A k-local Hamiltonian (quantum mechanics) [math]\displaystyle{ H }[/math] is a Hermitian matrix acting on n qubits which can be represented as the sum of [math]\displaystyle{ m }[/math] Hamiltonian terms acting upon at most [math]\displaystyle{ k }[/math] qubits each:

[math]\displaystyle{ H = \sum_{i=1}^m H_i. }[/math]

The general k-local Hamiltonian problem is, given a k-local Hamiltonian [math]\displaystyle{ H }[/math], to find the smallest eigenvalue [math]\displaystyle{ \lambda }[/math] of [math]\displaystyle{ H }[/math].[9] [math]\displaystyle{ \lambda }[/math] is also called the ground-state energy of the Hamiltonian.

The family of local Hamiltonians thus arises out of the k-local problem. Kliesch states the following as a definition for local Hamiltonians in the context of NLTS:[2]

Let IN be an index set. A family of local Hamiltonians is a set of Hamiltonians {H(n)}, nI, where each H(n) is defined on n finite-dimensional subsystems (in the following taken to be qubits), that are of the form

[math]\displaystyle{ H^{(n)} = \sum_n H_m^{(n)}, }[/math]

where each Hm(n) acts non-trivially on O(1) qubits. Another constraint is the operator norm of Hm(n) is bounded by a constant independent of n and each qubit is only involved in a constant number of terms Hm(n).

Topological order

Main page: Physics:Symmetry-protected topological order

In physics, topological order[10] is a kind of order in the zero-temperature phase of matter (also known as quantum matter). In the context of NLTS, Kliesch states: "a family of local gapped Hamiltonians is called topologically ordered if any ground states cannot be prepared from a product state by a constant-depth circuit".[2]

NLTS property

Kliesch defines the NLTS property thus:[2]

Let I be an infinite set of system sizes. A family of local Hamiltonians {H(n)}, nI has the NLTS property if there exists ε > 0 and a function f : NN such that

  • for all nI, H(n) has ground energy 0,
  • ⟨0n|UH(n)U|0n⟩ > εn for any depth-d circuit U consisting of two qubit gates and for any nI with nf(d).

NLTS conjecture

There exists a family of local Hamiltonians with the NLTS property.[2]

Quantum PCP conjecture

Main page: PCP theorem

Proving the NLTS conjecture is an obstacle for resolving the qPCP conjecture, an even harder theorem to prove.[1] The qPCP conjecture is a quantum analogue of the classical PCP theorem. The classical PCP theorem states that satisfiability problems like 3SAT are NP-hard when estimating the maximal number of clauses that can be simultaneously satisfied in a hamiltonian system.[7] In layman's terms, classical PCP describes the near-infinite complexity involved in predicting the outcome of a system with many resolving states, such as a water bath full of hundreds of magnets.[6] qPCP increases the complexity by trying to solve PCP for quantum states.[6] Though it hasn't been proven yet, a positive proof of qPCP would imply that quantum entanglement in Gibbs states could remain stable at higher-energy states above absolute zero.[7]

NLETS proof

NLTS on its own is difficult to prove, though a simpler no low-error trivial states (NLETS) theorem has been proven, and that proof is a precursor for NLTS.[11]

NLETS is defined as:[11]

Let k > 1 be some integer, and {Hn}nN be a family of k-local Hamiltonians. {Hn}nN is NLETS if there exists a constant ε > 0 such that any ε-impostor family F = {ρn}nN of {Hn}nN is non-trivial.

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 "On the NLTS Conjecture" (in en). 2021-06-30. https://simons.berkeley.edu/talks/nlts-conjecture. 
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 Kliesch, Alexander (2020-01-23). "The NLTS conjecture". https://www-m5.ma.tum.de/foswiki/pub/M5/Allgemeines/HS_ResearchSemQIT2019/NLTSConjecture.pdf. 
  3. Anshu, Anurag; Nirkhe, Chinmay (2020-11-01). Circuit lower bounds for low-energy states of quantum code Hamiltonians. Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs). 215. pp. 6:1–6:22. doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2022.6. ISBN 9783959772174. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020arXiv201102044A. 
  4. Freedman, Michael H.; Hastings, Matthew B. (January 2014). "Quantum Systems on Non-$k$-Hyperfinite Complexes: a generalization of classical statistical mechanics on expander graphs". Quantum Information and Computation 14 (1&2): 144–180. doi:10.26421/qic14.1-2-9. ISSN 1533-7146. http://dx.doi.org/10.26421/qic14.1-2-9. 
  5. 5.0 5.1 "Circuit lower bounds for low-energy states of quantum code Hamiltonians". 2020-11-03. https://deepai.org/publication/circuit-lower-bounds-for-low-energy-states-of-quantum-code-hamiltonians. 
  6. 6.0 6.1 6.2 6.3 "Computer Science Proof Lifts Limits on Quantum Entanglement" (in en). 2022-07-18. https://www.quantamagazine.org/computer-science-proof-lifts-limits-on-quantum-entanglement-20220718/. 
  7. 7.0 7.1 7.2 "Research Vignette: Quantum PCP Conjectures" (in en). 2014-09-30. https://simons.berkeley.edu/news/research-vignette-qhc2014. 
  8. Anshu, Anurag; Breuckmann, Nikolas P.; Nirkhe, Chinmay (2023). "NLTS Hamiltonians from Good Quantum Codes". Proceedings of the 55th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing. pp. 1090–1096. doi:10.1145/3564246.3585114. ISBN 9781450399135. 
  9. Morimae, Tomoyuki; Takeuchi, Yuki; Nishimura, Harumichi (2018-11-15). "Merlin-Arthur with efficient quantum Merlin and quantum supremacy for the second level of the Fourier hierarchy". Quantum 2: 106. doi:10.22331/q-2018-11-15-106. ISSN 2521-327X. Bibcode2018Quant...2..106M. 
  10. Wen 1990.
  11. 11.0 11.1 Eldar, Lior (2017). "Local Hamiltonians Whose Ground States are Hard to Approximate". http://ieee-focs.org/FOCS-2017-Papers/3464a427.pdf.