Noether inequality

From HandWiki

In mathematics, the Noether inequality, named after Max Noether, is a property of compact minimal complex surfaces that restricts the topological type of the underlying topological 4-manifold. It holds more generally for minimal projective surfaces of general type over an algebraically closed field.

Formulation of the inequality

Let X be a smooth minimal projective surface of general type defined over an algebraically closed field (or a smooth minimal compact complex surface of general type) with canonical divisor K = −c1(X), and let pg = h0(K) be the dimension of the space of holomorphic two forms, then

[math]\displaystyle{ p_g \le \frac{1}{2} c_1(X)^2 + 2. }[/math]

For complex surfaces, an alternative formulation expresses this inequality in terms of topological invariants of the underlying real oriented four manifold. Since a surface of general type is a Kähler surface, the dimension of the maximal positive subspace in intersection form on the second cohomology is given by b+ = 1 + 2pg. Moreover, by the Hirzebruch signature theorem c12 (X) = 2e + 3σ, where e = c2(X) is the topological Euler characteristic and σ = b+ − b is the signature of the intersection form. Therefore, the Noether inequality can also be expressed as

[math]\displaystyle{ b_+ \le 2 e + 3 \sigma + 5 }[/math]

or equivalently using e = 2 – 2 b1 + b+ + b

[math]\displaystyle{ b_- + 4 b_1 \le 4b_+ + 9. }[/math]

Combining the Noether inequality with the Noether formula 12χ=c12+c2 gives

[math]\displaystyle{ 5 c_1(X)^2 - c_2(X) + 36 \ge 12q }[/math]

where q is the irregularity of a surface, which leads to a slightly weaker inequality, which is also often called the Noether inequality:

[math]\displaystyle{ 5 c_1(X)^2 - c_2(X) + 36 \ge 0 \quad (c_1^2(X)\text{ even}) }[/math]
[math]\displaystyle{ 5 c_1(X)^2 - c_2(X) + 30 \ge 0 \quad (c_1^2(X)\text{ odd}). }[/math]

Surfaces where equality holds (i.e. on the Noether line) are called Horikawa surfaces.

Proof sketch

It follows from the minimal general type condition that K2 > 0. We may thus assume that pg > 1, since the inequality is otherwise automatic. In particular, we may assume there is an effective divisor D representing K. We then have an exact sequence

[math]\displaystyle{ 0 \to H^0(\mathcal{O}_X) \to H^0(K) \to H^0( K|_D) \to H^1(\mathcal{O}_X) \to }[/math]

so [math]\displaystyle{ p_g - 1 \le h^0(K|_D). }[/math]

Assume that D is smooth. By the adjunction formula D has a canonical linebundle [math]\displaystyle{ \mathcal{O}_D(2K) }[/math], therefore [math]\displaystyle{ K|_D }[/math] is a special divisor and the Clifford inequality applies, which gives

[math]\displaystyle{ h^0(K|_D) - 1 \le \frac{1}{2} \deg_D(K) = \frac{1}{2} K^2. }[/math]

In general, essentially the same argument applies using a more general version of the Clifford inequality for local complete intersections with a dualising line bundle and 1-dimensional sections in the trivial line bundle. These conditions are satisfied for the curve D by the adjunction formula and the fact that D is numerically connected.

References