Philosophy:Differential K theory
In psychology and criminology, Differential K theory is a debunked hypothesis first proposed by Canadian psychologist J. Philippe Rushton in 1985,[1] which attempts to apply r/K selection theory to human races.[2] According to Rushton, this theory explains race differences in fertility, IQ, criminality, and sexual anatomy and behavior.[3] The theory also hypothesizes that a single factor, the "K factor", affects multiple population statistics Rushton referred to as "life-history traits".[4] It has been criticized as a key example of scientific racism and devoid of empirical basis.[5][6]
Reception
As Andrew Winston summarizes, "Rushton's work was heavily criticized by psychologists, evolutionary biologists, anthropologists, and geneticists for severe scientific inadequacies, fundamental errors, inappropriate conceptualization of race, inappropriate statistical comparisons, misuse of sources, and serious logical errors and flaws."[5] Differential K theory in particular was described in a 2020 statement by Rushton's former department at Western Ontario University as "thoroughly debunked."[2]
Weizmann et al. argued that Rushton attempted to validate this hypothesis by use of "selective citation and misrepresentation of the research literature and by the use of unreliable sources"[3] and that Rushton's methodology "indicates a lack of familiarity with ecological thinking and scientific method in general."[7] Additional criticism of the theory has come from Edward M. Miller, who has argued that contrary to the theory, unpredictable environments select for K, not r characteristics.[8]
References
- ↑ Rushton, J. Philippe (January 1985). "Differential K theory: The sociobiology of individual and group differences". Personality and Individual Differences 6 (4): 441–452. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(85)90137-0.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 "Statement from the Department of Psychology regarding research conducted by Dr. J. Philippe Rushton". https://psychology.uwo.ca/people/faculty/remembrance/rushton.html.
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 Weizmann, Fredric; Wiener, Neil I.; Wiesenthal, David L.; Ziegler, Michael (1990). "Differential K theory and racial hierarchies.". Canadian Psychology 31 (1): 1–13. doi:10.1037/h0078934.
- ↑ Templer, Donald I. (October 2008). "Correlational and factor analytic support for Rushton's differential K life history theory". Personality and Individual Differences 45 (6): 440–444. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2008.05.010.
- ↑ 5.0 5.1 Winston, Andrew S. (29 May 2020). "Scientific Racism and North American Psychology". doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780190236557.013.516. https://oxfordre.com/psychology/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190236557.001.0001/acrefore-9780190236557-e-516;.
- ↑ Weizmann, Frederic; Wiener, Neil I.; Wiesenthal, David L.; Ziegler, Michael (1989). "Scientific racism in contemporary psychology". International Journal of Dynamic Assessment & Instruction 1 (1): 81–93. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1997-72991-001.
- ↑ Anderson, Judith L. (1991). "Rushton's racial comparisons: An ecological critique of theory and method.". Canadian Psychology 32 (1): 51–62. doi:10.1037/h0078956.
- ↑ Miller, Edward M. (December 1995). "Environmental variability selects for large families only in special circumstances: Another objection to differential K theory". Personality and Individual Differences 19 (6): 903–918. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(95)00126-3.
 |  |
