Philosophy:Multimodal logic

A multimodal logic is a modal logic that has more than one primitive modal operator. They find substantial applications in theoretical computer science.

Overview

A modal logic with n primitive unary modal operators [math]\displaystyle{ \Box_i, i\in \{1,\ldots, n\} }[/math] is called an n-modal logic. Given these operators and negation, one can always add [math]\displaystyle{ \Diamond_i }[/math] modal operators defined as [math]\displaystyle{ \Diamond_i P }[/math] if and only if [math]\displaystyle{ \lnot \Box_i \lnot P }[/math].

Perhaps the first substantive example of a two-modal logic is Arthur Prior's tense logic, with two modalities, F and P, corresponding to "sometime in the future" and "sometime in the past". A logic with infinitely many modalities is dynamic logic, introduced by Vaughan Pratt in 1976 and having a separate modal operator for every regular expression. A version of temporal logic introduced in 1977 and intended for program verification has two modalities, corresponding to dynamic logic's [A] and [A*] modalities for a single program A, understood as the whole universe taking one step forwards in time. The term multimodal logic itself was not introduced until 1980. Another example of a multimodal logic is the Hennessy–Milner logic, itself a fragment of the more expressive modal μ-calculus, which is also a fixed-point logic.

Multimodal logic can be used also to formalize a kind of knowledge representation: the motivation of epistemic logic is allowing several agents (they are regarded as subjects capable of forming beliefs, knowledge); and managing the belief or knowledge of each agent, so that epistemic assertions can be formed about them. The modal operator [math]\displaystyle{ \Box }[/math] must be capable of bookkeeping the cognition of each agent, thus [math]\displaystyle{ \Box_i }[/math] must be indexed on the set of the agents. The motivation is that [math]\displaystyle{ \Box_i \alpha }[/math] should assert "The subject i has knowledge about [math]\displaystyle{ \alpha }[/math] being true". But it can be used also for formalizing "the subject i believes [math]\displaystyle{ \alpha }[/math]". For formalization of meaning based on the possible world semantics approach, a multimodal generalization of Kripke semantics can be used: instead of a single "common" accessibility relation, there is a series of them indexed on the set of agents.

References

• Ferenczi, Miklós (2002) (in hu). Matematikai logika. Budapest: Műszaki könyvkiadó. ISBN 963-16-2870-1. 
• Dov M. Gabbay, Agi Kurucz, Frank Wolter, Michael Zakharyaschev (2003). Many-dimensional modal logics: theory and applications. Elsevier. ISBN 978-0-444-50826-3. 
• Walter Carnielli; Claudio Pizzi (2008). Modalities and Multimodalities. Springer. ISBN 978-1-4020-8589-5. 

External links

• Modal Logic entry by James Garson in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy