Physics:COST Hata model

From HandWiki

The COST Hata model is a radio propagation model (i.e. path loss) that extends the urban Hata model (which in turn is based on the Okumura model) to cover a more elaborated range of frequencies (up to 2 GHz). It is the most often cited of the COST 231 models (EU funded research project ca. April 1986 – April 1996),[1] also called the Hata Model PCS Extension.[2]

COST (COopération européenne dans le domaine de la recherche Scientifique et Technique) is a European Union Forum for cooperative scientific research which has developed this model based on experimental measurements in multiple cities across Europe.

Applicable to / under conditions

This model is applicable to macro cells in urban areas. To further evaluate Path Loss in suburban or rural (quasi-)open areas, this path loss has to be substituted into Urban to Rural / Urban to Suburban Conversions. (Ray GAO, 09 Sep 2007)

Coverage

Mathematical formulation

The COST Hata model is formulated as,

Lb=46.3+33.9log10fMHz13.82log10hBma(hR,f)+(44.96.55log10hBm)log10dkm+Cm

where,

Lb Median path loss. Unit: decibel (dB)
f Frequency of Transmission. Unit: megahertz (MHz)
hB Base station antenna effective height. Unit: meter (m)
d Link distance. Unit: Kilometer (km)
hR Mobile station antenna effective height. Unit: meter (m)
a(hR,f) Mobile station antenna height correction factor as described in the Hata model for urban areas.

For suburban or rural environments this factor is defined as,

a(hR,f)=(1.1log10fMHz0.7)hRm(1.56log10fMHz0.8)

and, for urban environments (i.e. large cities) as,

a(hR,f)={8.29(log10(1.54hR))21.1,if 150f2003.2(log10(11.75hR))24.97,if 200<f1500

Cm Constant offset. Unit: decibel (dB). Defined as,

Cm={0 dBfor medium cities and suburban areas3 dBfor metropolitan areas

Limitations

This model requires that the base station antenna is higher than all adjacent rooftops.

References

  1. http://www.cost.eu/domains_actions/ict/Actions/231 COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology) website
  2. Final report for COST Action 231, Chapter 4

See also