Physics:List of HEP measurements with largest discrepancies
Here is a list of experimental measurements in high-energy particle physics (HEP) with largest deviations from either the state-of-the art theory or some data-driven expectation. This list contains only measurements that include "evidence" for some new phenomena, which is defined as measurements with more than 3 "σ" (3 sigma or standard deviations) i.e. 0.3% probability of occurring by chance. The significance is defined as "local", i.e. it does not include look-elsewhere effect.
Intriguing deviations with significance >3 sigma can be signs of new physics. For example, top quarks were first hinted at in the 1994 paper by the CDF collaboration, observing an excess of events amounting to about 3-sigma, but the existence of the top quark was fully established later. However, in most cases, 3 sigma deviations can be due to statistical or some systematic effects that require clarifications by independent measurements.
Description | Year | Experiment | Excess level | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|
Enhancement around 4.5 GeV [1] | 2022 | BESIII | 3.3 σ | Not confirmed by others |
Higgs search in bbmumu channel at 52 GeV [2] | 2022 | ATLAS | 3.3 σ | Not confirmed by CMS |
g-2 (muon anomalous magnetic moment)[3] | 2021 | Muon g−2 | 3.3 σ | No other experiments |
Excess of electronic recoil at 1-7 keV [4] | 2021 | XENON1T | 4.0 σ | No other experiments |
Excess of electron like events[5] | 2018 | MiniBooNE | 6 σ | No other experiments |
X17 particle at 17 MeV[6] | 2018 | Atomki Inst. | 7.2 σ | Not confirmed by other experiments |
W mass measurement [7] | 2022 | CDF | 7 σ | Not confirmed by other experiments |
Dijets+lepton mass at 1.3 TeV [8] | 2022 | ATLAS | 3.5 σ | No CMS measurement |
4-jet mass at 8 TeV [9] | 2022 | CMS | 3.6 σ | No ATLAS measurement |
SUSY search [10] | 2015 | ATLAS | 3.0 σ | Not confirmed by CMS |
Lepton universality in beauty-quark decays [11] | 2021 | LHCb | 3.1 σ | No other measurements |
Bump at 4.8 TeV for muon+jet invariant mass using unsupervised machine learning for anomaly detection [12] | 2023 | ATLAS | ~3 σ | No other measurements |
Diboson excess for ZW channel [13] | 2021 | ATLAS | 3.4 σ | CMS does not confirm |
Like-sign dimuon charge asymmetry [14] | 2010 | D0 | 3.2 σ | CDF does not confirm |
Faster-than-light neutrino [15] | 2011 | OPERA | 6 σ | Not confirmed |
2 b-quarks+1 photon [16] | 1986 | CDF | 4 σ | Not confirmed |
Excess for W + 2-jets at 140 GeV [17] | 2011 | CDF | 3.2 σ | D0 does not confirm |
Higgs-like excess at 114 GeV [18] | 2010 | ALEPH | 3.2 σ | No in other LEP experiments |
pK0 mass at 1.52 GeV[19] | 2004 | ZEUS | 3.9 σ | H1 does not confirm |
Charm pentaquark 3.1 GeV [20] | 2004 | H1 | 6.2 σ | ZEUS does not confirm |
nK+ mass at 1.54 GeV [21] | 2003 | SAPHIR | 4.8 σ | Not confirmed |
nK+ mass at 1.54 GeV [22] | 2003 | LEPS/SPring-8 | 4.6 σ | Not confirmed |
pK0 mass at 1.53 GeV [23] | 2003 | DIANA | 4.4 σ | Not confirmed |
Excess of deuterons in ep[24] | 2007 | ZEUS | 10 σ or more [25] | No other experiments |
References
- ↑ M. Ablikim at al, (BES Collaboration), Study of the resonance structures in e+e−→π+π−J/ψ process URL
- ↑ G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Phys. Rev.D. 105, 012006 (2022), URL
- ↑ B. Abi et al. (Muon g − 2 Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 141801 (2021), URL
- ↑ E. Aprile (XENON Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 102, 072004 (2020) (2020), URL
- ↑ A.A. Aguilar-Arevalo, MiniBooNE Collaboration, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 221801 (2018), URL
- ↑ A.J. Krasznahorkay et al. nucl-ex arXiv:1910.10459 (2019) URL
- ↑ T. Aaltonen et al. (CDF Collaboration), Science 376, 170 URL
- ↑ Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), ATLAS-CONF-2022-048, URL
- ↑ CMS Collaboration, CMS-EXO-21-010, CERN-EP-2022-103, URL
- ↑ ATLAS Collaboration, Eur. Phys. J. C 75 (2015) 318 URL
- ↑ LHCb Collaboration, HCb-PAPER-2021-004, CERN-EP-2021-042 URL
- ↑ ATLAS Collaboration, CERN-EP-2023-112[ https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.01612 URL]
- ↑ ATLAS Collaboration, JHEP 12 (2015) 55 URL
- ↑ D0 Collaboration, Phys.Rev. D82, 032001, 2010, URL
- ↑ T.Adam, (OPERA Collaboration), arXiv:1109.4897 URL
- ↑ CDF, [https:// URL]
- ↑ CDF Collaboration, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 171801 (2011), URL
- ↑ ALEPH Collaboration, Phys.Lett. B495, 1-17, 2000 URL
- ↑ S.Chekanov et al, (ZEUS Collaboration), Phys.Lett. B591, 7-22, 2004 URL
- ↑ S.Chekanov et al, (H1 Collaboration), Phys.Lett. B588, 17,2004 URL
- ↑ J. Barth, et al, (SAPHIR Collaboration), Phys.Lett. B572 127-132, 2003 URL
- ↑ T. Nakano et al. (LEPS Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 (2003) 012002 URL
- ↑ V.V. Barmin et al, (DIANA Collaboration), Phys.Atom.Nucl. 66 , 1715-1718,2003; Yad.Fiz.66:1763-1766,2003 URL
- ↑ S.Chekanov et al, (ZEUS Collaboration), Nucl.Phys. B786 181-205, 2007 URL
- ↑ Comment: There are no model predictions. The "sigma" was estimated from the deviation of the deuteron/anti-deuteron ratio from 1 (listed in the paper). This discrepancy is assumed from the fact that there should be no baryon-antibaryon asymmetry in the central fragmentation region of ep, therefore, the ratio deuteron/anti-deuteron=1 is expected. This paper confirms the expected p/anti(p)=1, but this does not hold for deuterons.