Physics:Quantum instrument

From HandWiki
Short description: Mathematical abstraction of quantum measurement

In quantum physics, a quantum instrument is a mathematical description of a quantum measurement, capturing both the classical and quantum outputs.[1] It can be equivalently understood as a quantum channel that takes as input a quantum system and has as its output two systems: a classical system containing the outcome of the measurement and a quantum system containing the post-measurement state.[2]

Definition

Let X be a countable set describing the outcomes of a quantum measurement, and let {ℰx}x∈X denote a collection of trace-non-increasing completely positive maps, such that the sum of all ℰx is trace-preserving, i.e. tr⁡(∑xℰx(ρ))=tr⁡(ρ) for all positive operators ρ.

Now for describing a measurement by an instrument ℐ, the maps ℰx are used to model the mapping from an input state ρ to the output state of a measurement conditioned on a classical measurement outcome x. Therefore, the probability that a specific measurement outcome x occurs on a state ρ is given by[3][4] p(x|ρ)=tr⁡(ℰx(ρ)).

The state after a measurement with the specific outcome x is given by[3][4]

ρx=ℰx(ρ)tr⁡(ℰx(ρ)).

If the measurement outcomes are recorded in a classical register, whose states are modeled by a set of orthonormal projections |x⟩⟨x|∈ℬ(ℂ|X|) , then the action of an instrument ℐ is given by a quantum channel ℐ:ℬ(ℋ1)→ℬ(ℋ2)⊗ℬ(ℂ|X|) with[2]

ℐ(ρ):=∑xℰx(ρ)⊗|x⟩⟨x|.

Here ℋ1 and ℋ2⊗ℂ|X| are the Hilbert spaces corresponding to the input and the output systems of the instrument.

Reductions and inductions

Just as a completely positive trace preserving (CPTP) map can always be considered as the reduction of unitary evolution on a system with an initially unentangled auxiliary, quantum instruments are the reductions of projective measurement with a conditional unitary, and also reduce to CPTP maps and POVMs when ignore measurement outcomes and state evolution, respectively.[4] In John Smolin's terminology, this is an example of "going to the Church of the Larger Hilbert space".

As a reduction of projective measurement and conditional unitary

Any quantum instrument on a system 𝒮 can be modeled as a projective measurement on 𝒮 and (jointly) an uncorrelated auxiliary 𝒜 followed by a unitary conditional on the measurement outcome.[3][4] Let η (with η>0 and Trη=1) be the normalized initial state of 𝒜, let {Πi} (with Πi=Πi†=Πi2 and ΠiΠj=δijΠi) be a projective measurement on 𝒮𝒜, and let {Ui} (with Ui†=Ui−1) be unitaries on 𝒮𝒜. Then one can check that

ℰi(ρ):=Tr𝒜(UiΠi(ρ⊗η)ΠiUi†)

defines a quantum instrument.[4] Furthermore, one can also check that any choice of quantum instrument {ℰi} can be obtained with this construction for some choice of η and {Ui}.[4]

In this sense, a quantum instrument can be thought of as the reduction of a projective measurement combined with a conditional unitary.

Reduction to CPTP map

Any quantum instrument {ℰi} immediately induces a CPTP map, i.e., a quantum channel:[4]

ℰ(ρ):=∑iℰi(ρ).

This can be thought of as the overall effect of the measurement on the quantum system if the measurement outcome is thrown away.

Reduction to POVM

Any quantum instrument {ℰi} immediately induces a positive operator-valued measurement (POVM):

Mi:=∑aKa(i)†Ka(i)

where Ka(i) are any choice of Kraus operators for ℰi,[4]

ℰi(ρ)=∑aKa(i)ρKa(i)†.

The Kraus operators Ka(i) are not uniquely determined by the CP maps ℰi, but the above definition of the POVM elements Mi is the same for any choice.[4] The POVM can be thought of as the measurement of the quantum system if the information about how the system is affected by the measurement is thrown away.

References

  1. ↑ Alter, Orly; Yamamoto, Yoshihisa (2001). Quantum Measurement of a Single System. New York: Wiley. doi:10.1002/9783527617128. ISBN 9780471283089. 
  2. ↑ 2.0 2.1 Jordan, Andrew N.; Siddiqi, Irfan A. (2024). Quantum Measurement: Theory and Practice. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1009100069. 
  3. ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 Ozawa, Masanao (1984). "Quantum measuring processes of continuous observables". Journal of Mathematical Physics 25: 79-87. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.526000. 
  4. ↑ 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.6 4.7 4.8 Busch, Paul; Lahti, Pekka; Pellonpää, Juha-Pekka; Ylinen, Kari (2016). Quantum measurement. 23. Springer. pp. 261--262. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-43389-9. ISBN 978-3-319-43387-5.