Poloidal–toroidal decomposition
In vector calculus, a topic in pure and applied mathematics, a poloidal–toroidal decomposition is a restricted form of the Helmholtz decomposition. It is often used in the spherical coordinates analysis of solenoidal vector fields, for example, magnetic fields and incompressible fluids.[1]
Definition
For a three-dimensional vector field F with zero divergence
- [math]\displaystyle{ \nabla \cdot \mathbf{F} = 0, }[/math]
this F can be expressed as the sum of a toroidal field T and poloidal vector field P
- [math]\displaystyle{ \mathbf{F} = \mathbf{T} + \mathbf{P} }[/math]
where r is a radial vector in spherical coordinates (r, θ, φ). The toroidal field is obtained from a scalar field, Ψ(r, θ, φ),[2] as the following curl,
- [math]\displaystyle{ \mathbf{T} = \nabla \times (\mathbf{r} \Psi(\mathbf{r})) }[/math]
and the poloidal field is derived from another scalar field Φ(r, θ, φ),[3] as a twice-iterated curl,
- [math]\displaystyle{ \mathbf{P} = \nabla \times (\nabla \times (\mathbf{r} \Phi (\mathbf{r})))\,. }[/math]
This decomposition is symmetric in that the curl of a toroidal field is poloidal, and the curl of a poloidal field is toroidal, known as Chandrasekhar–Kendall function.[4]
Geometry
A toroidal vector field is tangential to spheres around the origin,[4]
- [math]\displaystyle{ \mathbf{r} \cdot \mathbf{T} = 0 }[/math]
while the curl of a poloidal field is tangential to those spheres
- [math]\displaystyle{ \mathbf{r} \cdot (\nabla \times \mathbf{P}) = 0. }[/math][5]
The poloidal–toroidal decomposition is unique if it is required that the average of the scalar fields Ψ and Φ vanishes on every sphere of radius r.[3]
Cartesian decomposition
A poloidal–toroidal decomposition also exists in Cartesian coordinates, but a mean-field flow has to be included in this case. For example, every solenoidal vector field can be written as
- [math]\displaystyle{ \mathbf{F}(x,y,z) = \nabla \times g(x,y,z) \hat{\mathbf{z}} + \nabla \times (\nabla \times h(x,y,z) \hat{\mathbf{z}}) + b_x(z) \hat{\mathbf{x}} + b_y(z)\hat{\mathbf{y}}, }[/math]
where [math]\displaystyle{ \hat{\mathbf{x}}, \hat{\mathbf{y}}, \hat{\mathbf{z}} }[/math] denote the unit vectors in the coordinate directions.[6]
See also
Notes
- ↑ Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar (1961). Hydrodynamic and hydromagnetic stability. International Series of Monographs on Physics. Oxford: Clarendon. See discussion on page 622. http://cdsads.u-strasbg.fr/abs/1961hhs..book.....C.
- ↑ Backus 1986, p. 87.
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 Backus 1986, p. 88.
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 Backus, Parker & Constable 1996, p. 178.
- ↑ Backus, Parker & Constable 1996, p. 179.
- ↑ Jones 2008, p. 17.
References
- Hydrodynamic and hydromagnetic stability, Chandrasekhar, Subrahmanyan; International Series of Monographs on Physics, Oxford: Clarendon, 1961, p. 622.
- Decomposition of solenoidal fields into poloidal fields, toroidal fields and the mean flow. Applications to the boussinesq-equations, Schmitt, B. J. and von Wahl, W; in The Navier–Stokes Equations II — Theory and Numerical Methods, pp. 291–305; Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Springer Berlin/ Heidelberg, Vol. 1530/ 1992.
- Anelastic Magnetohydrodynamic Equations for Modeling Solar and Stellar Convection Zones, Lantz, S. R. and Fan, Y.; The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, Volume 121, Issue 1, Mar. 1999, pp. 247–264.
- Plane poloidal-toroidal decomposition of doubly periodic vector fields: Part 1. Fields with divergence and Part 2. Stokes equations. G. D. McBain. ANZIAM J. 47 (2005)
- Backus, George (1986), "Poloidal and toroidal fields in geomagnetic field modeling", Reviews of Geophysics 24: 75–109, doi:10.1029/RG024i001p00075, Bibcode: 1986RvGeo..24...75B.
- Backus, George; Parker, Robert; Constable, Catherine (1996), Foundations of Geomagnetism, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 0-521-41006-1.
- Jones, Chris, Dynamo Theory, http://www1.maths.leeds.ac.uk/~cajones/LesHouches/chapter.pdf.
Original source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poloidal–toroidal decomposition.
Read more |