Relative effective Cartier divisor

From HandWiki

In algebraic geometry, a relative effective Cartier divisor is roughly a family of effective Cartier divisors. Precisely, an effective Cartier divisor in a scheme X over a ring R is a closed subscheme D of X that (1) is flat over R and (2) the ideal sheaf [math]\displaystyle{ I(D) }[/math] of D is locally free of rank one (i.e., invertible sheaf). Equivalently, a closed subscheme D of X is an effective Cartier divisor if there is an open affine cover [math]\displaystyle{ U_i = \operatorname{Spec} A_i }[/math] of X and nonzerodivisors [math]\displaystyle{ f_i \in A_i }[/math] such that the intersection [math]\displaystyle{ D \cap U_i }[/math] is given by the equation [math]\displaystyle{ f_i = 0 }[/math] (called local equations) and [math]\displaystyle{ A / f_i A }[/math] is flat over R and such that they are compatible.

An effective Cartier divisor as the zero-locus of a section of a line bundle

Let L be a line bundle on X and s a section of it such that [math]\displaystyle{ s: \mathcal{O}_X \hookrightarrow L }[/math] (in other words, s is a [math]\displaystyle{ \mathcal{O}_X(U) }[/math]-regular element for any open subset U.)

Choose some open cover [math]\displaystyle{ \{ U_i \} }[/math] of X such that [math]\displaystyle{ L|_{U_i} \simeq \mathcal{O}_X|_{U_i} }[/math]. For each i, through the isomorphisms, the restriction [math]\displaystyle{ s|_{U_i} }[/math] corresponds to a nonzerodivisor [math]\displaystyle{ f_i }[/math] of [math]\displaystyle{ \mathcal{O}_X(U_i) }[/math]. Now, define the closed subscheme [math]\displaystyle{ \{ s = 0 \} }[/math] of X (called the zero-locus of the section s) by

[math]\displaystyle{ \{ s = 0 \} \cap U_i = \{ f_i = 0 \}, }[/math]

where the right-hand side means the closed subscheme of [math]\displaystyle{ U_i }[/math] given by the ideal sheaf generated by [math]\displaystyle{ f_i }[/math]. This is well-defined (i.e., they agree on the overlaps) since [math]\displaystyle{ f_i/f_j|_{U_i \cap U_j} }[/math] is a unit element. For the same reason, the closed subscheme [math]\displaystyle{ \{ s = 0 \} }[/math] is independent of the choice of local trivializations.

Equivalently, the zero locus of s can be constructed as a fiber of a morphism; namely, viewing L as the total space of it, the section s is a X-morphism of L: a morphism [math]\displaystyle{ s: X \to L }[/math] such that s followed by [math]\displaystyle{ L \to X }[/math] is the identity. Then [math]\displaystyle{ \{ s = 0 \} }[/math] may be constructed as the fiber product of s and the zero-section embedding [math]\displaystyle{ s_0: X \to L }[/math].

Finally, when [math]\displaystyle{ \{ s = 0 \} }[/math] is flat over the base scheme S, it is an effective Cartier divisor on X over S. Furthermore, this construction exhausts all effective Cartier divisors on X as follows. Let D be an effective Cartier divisor and [math]\displaystyle{ I(D) }[/math] denote the ideal sheaf of D. Because of locally-freeness, taking [math]\displaystyle{ I(D)^{-1} \otimes_{\mathcal{O}_X} - }[/math] of [math]\displaystyle{ 0 \to I(D) \to \mathcal{O}_X \to \mathcal{O}_D \to 0 }[/math] gives the exact sequence

[math]\displaystyle{ 0 \to \mathcal{O}_X \to I(D)^{-1} \to I(D)^{-1} \otimes \mathcal{O}_D \to 0 }[/math]

In particular, 1 in [math]\displaystyle{ \Gamma(X, \mathcal{O}_X) }[/math] can be identified with a section in [math]\displaystyle{ \Gamma(X, I(D)^{-1}) }[/math], which we denote by [math]\displaystyle{ s_D }[/math].

Now we can repeat the early argument with [math]\displaystyle{ L = I(D)^{-1} }[/math]. Since D is an effective Cartier divisor, D is locally of the form [math]\displaystyle{ \{ f = 0 \} }[/math] on [math]\displaystyle{ U = \operatorname{Spec}(A) }[/math] for some nonzerodivisor f in A. The trivialization [math]\displaystyle{ L|_U = Af^{-1} \overset{\sim}\to A }[/math] is given by multiplication by f; in particular, 1 corresponds to f. Hence, the zero-locus of [math]\displaystyle{ s_D }[/math] is D.

Properties

  • If D and D' are effective Cartier divisors, then the sum [math]\displaystyle{ D + D' }[/math] is the effective Cartier divisor defined locally as [math]\displaystyle{ fg = 0 }[/math] if f, g give local equations for D and D' .
  • If D is an effective Cartier divisor and [math]\displaystyle{ R \to R' }[/math] is a ring homomorphism, then [math]\displaystyle{ D \times_R R' }[/math] is an effective Cartier divisor in [math]\displaystyle{ X \times_R R' }[/math].
  • If D is an effective Cartier divisor and [math]\displaystyle{ f: X' \to X }[/math] a flat morphism over R, then [math]\displaystyle{ D' = D \times_X X' }[/math] is an effective Cartier divisor in X' with the ideal sheaf [math]\displaystyle{ I(D') = f^* (I(D)) }[/math].

Examples

Hyperplane bundle

Effective Cartier divisors on a relative curve

From now on suppose X is a smooth curve (still over R). Let D be an effective Cartier divisor in X and assume it is proper over R (which is immediate if X is proper.) Then [math]\displaystyle{ \Gamma(D, \mathcal{O}_D) }[/math] is a locally free R-module of finite rank. This rank is called the degree of D and is denoted by [math]\displaystyle{ \deg D }[/math]. It is a locally constant function on [math]\displaystyle{ \operatorname{Spec} R }[/math]. If D and D' are proper effective Cartier divisors, then [math]\displaystyle{ D + D' }[/math] is proper over R and [math]\displaystyle{ \deg(D + D') = \deg(D) + \deg(D') }[/math]. Let [math]\displaystyle{ f: X' \to X }[/math] be a finite flat morphism. Then [math]\displaystyle{ \deg(f^* D) = \deg(f) \deg(D) }[/math].[1] On the other hand, a base change does not change degree: [math]\displaystyle{ \deg(D \times_R R') = \deg(D) }[/math].[2]

A closed subscheme D of X is finite, flat and of finite presentation if and only if it is an effective Cartier divisor that is proper over R.[3]

Weil divisors associated to effective Cartier divisors

Given an effective Cartier divisor D, there are two equivalent ways to associate Weil divisor [math]\displaystyle{ [D] }[/math] to it.

Notes

  1. Katz & Mazur 1985, Lemma 1.2.8.
  2. Katz & Mazur 1985, Lemma 1.2.9.
  3. Katz & Mazur 1985, Lemma 1.2.3.

References

  • Katz, Nicholas M; Mazur, Barry (1985). Arithmetic Moduli of Elliptic Curves. Princeton University Press. ISBN 0-691-08352-5.