Religion:Textual variants in the Gospel of Mark

From HandWiki
Short description: Differences in New Testament manuscripts

Textual variants in the Gospel of Mark are the subject of the study called textual criticism of the New Testament. Textual variants in manuscripts arise when a copyist makes deliberate or inadvertent alterations to a text that is being reproduced.[1]:251-271 An abbreviated list of textual variants in this particular book is given in this article below.

Origen, writing in the 3rd century, was one of the first who made remarks about differences between manuscripts of texts that were eventually collected as the New Testament.[1]:200 He declared his preferences among variant readings. For example, in Matthew 27:16–17, he favored "Barabbas" against "Jesus Barabbas" (In Matt. Comm. ser. 121).[1]:201 In John 1:28, he preferred "Bethabara" over "Bethany" as the location where John was baptizing (Commentary on John VI.40 (24)).[1]:201 "Gergeza" was preferred over "Geraza" or "Gadara" (Commentary on John VI.40 (24) – see Matthew 8:28).[1]:201

Most of the variations are not significant and some common alterations include the deletion, rearrangement, repetition, or replacement of one or more words when the copyist's eye returns to a similar word in the wrong location of the original text.[1]:253 If their eye skips to an earlier word, they may create a repetition (error of dittography).[1]:254 If their eye skips to a later word, they may create an omission.[1]:253-254 They may resort to performing a rearranging of words to retain the overall meaning without compromising the context.[1]:257 In other instances, the copyist may add text from memory from a similar or parallel text in another location.[1]:257 Otherwise, they may also replace some text of the original with an alternative reading.[1]:257 Spellings occasionally change. Synonyms may be substituted. A pronoun may be changed into a proper noun (such as "he said" becoming "Jesus said").[1]:254-257 John Mill's 1707 Greek New Testament was estimated to contain some 30,000 variants in its accompanying textual apparatus[2] which was based on "nearly 100 [Greek] manuscripts."[1]:154 Peter J. Gurry puts the number of non-spelling variants among New Testament manuscripts around 500,000, though he acknowledges his estimate is higher than all previous ones.[3]

Legend

Textual variants

For a list of many variants not noted here, see the ECM of Mark.

Textual variants in the Gospel of Mark

See also

References

  1. Jump up to: 1.00 1.01 1.02 1.03 1.04 1.05 1.06 1.07 1.08 1.09 1.10 1.11 1.12 Metzger, Bruce Manning; Ehrman, Bart D. (2005). The Text of the New Testament: Its Transmission, Corruption and Restoration (4th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-516667-1. 
  2. Fox, Adam (1954). John Mill and Richard Bentley: A Study of the Textual Criticism of the New Testament 1675–1729. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. pp. 105–115. ; Mill, John (1707). Novum Testamentum Graecum, cum lectionibus variantibus MSS. Oxford. 
  3. Gurry, Peter J. (2016). "The Number of Variants in the Greek New Testament: A Proposed Estimate". New Testament Studies 62 (1): 113. doi:10.1017/S0028688515000314. http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=10040842. 
  4. Jump up to: 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.6 J.P. van de Giessen (2003). "Markus 1:1" (in nl). bijbelaantekeningen.nl. http://www.bijbelaantekeningen.nl/files/biblevers?Markus%201:1. 
  5. Jump up to: 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 5.6 5.7 5.8 "Mark 1:2 Text Analysis". Biblehub.com. https://biblehub.com/text/mark/1-2.htm. 
  6. Jump up to: 6.00 6.01 6.02 6.03 6.04 6.05 6.06 6.07 6.08 6.09 6.10 6.11 J.P. van de Giessen (2003). "Markus 1:2" (in nl). bijbelaantekeningen.nl. http://www.bijbelaantekeningen.nl/files/biblevers?Markus%201:2. 
  7. Jump up to: 7.0 7.1 7.2 7.3 7.4 7.5 J.P. van de Giessen (2003). "Markus 1:4" (in nl). bijbelaantekeningen.nl. http://www.bijbelaantekeningen.nl/files/biblevers?Markus%201:4. 
  8. Jump up to: 8.0 8.1 8.2 8.3 8.4 8.5 8.6 J.P. van de Giessen (2003). "Markus 1:5" (in nl). bijbelaantekeningen.nl. http://www.bijbelaantekeningen.nl/files/biblevers?Markus%201:5. 
  9. Jump up to: 9.0 9.1 J.P. van de Giessen (2003). "Markus 1:6" (in nl). bijbelaantekeningen.nl. http://www.bijbelaantekeningen.nl/files/biblevers?Markus%201:6. 
  10. Jump up to: 10.0 10.1 10.2 10.3 10.4 J.P. van de Giessen (2003). "Markus 1:7" (in nl). bijbelaantekeningen.nl. http://www.bijbelaantekeningen.nl/files/biblevers?Markus%201:7. 
  11. Jump up to: 11.00 11.01 11.02 11.03 11.04 11.05 11.06 11.07 11.08 11.09 11.10 11.11 J.P. van de Giessen (2003). "Markus 1:8" (in nl). bijbelaantekeningen.nl. http://www.bijbelaantekeningen.nl/files/biblevers?Markus%201:8. 
  12. Jump up to: 12.0 12.1 12.2 12.3 "Mark 1:8 Text Analysis". Biblehub.com. https://biblehub.com/text/mark/1-8.htm. 
  13. J.P. van de Giessen (2003). "Papyrus 137, p137, P.Oxy. 5345" (in nl). bijbelaantekeningen.nl. http://www.bijbelaantekeningen.nl/files/subject?4302. 
  14. INTF Mark 1:41
  15. "Mark 6:3 Text Analysis". Biblehub.com. https://biblehub.com/text/mark/6-3.htm. 
  16. "Mark 10:1 Text Analysis". Biblehub.com. https://biblehub.com/text/mark/10-1.htm. 
  17. Jump up to: 17.0 17.1 17.2 17.3 17.4 17.5 Westcott and Hort (1882), Introduction and Appendix § 323.
  18. codexsinaiticus.org Mark 14:30
  19. Jump up to: 19.0 19.1 "Mark 14:72 Text Analysis". Biblehub.com. https://biblehub.com/text/mark/14-72.htm. 
  20. codexsinaiticus.org Mark 14:72
  21. ECM Mark 15:34 Segment 50-52
  22. "Mark 15:40 Text Analysis". Biblehub.com. https://biblehub.com/text/mark/15-40.htm. 
  23. "Mark 15:47 Text Analysis". Biblehub.com. https://biblehub.com/text/mark/15-47.htm. 

Further reading

  • Novum Testamentum Graece et Latine, ed. E. Nestle, K. Aland, Stuttgart 1981.
  • Metzger, Bruce Manning; Ehrman, Bart D. (2005). The Text of the New Testament: Its Transmission, Corruption and Restoration (4th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-516667-1. 
  • Ehrman, Bart D. (1996). The Orthodox Corruption of Scripture: The Effect of Early Christological Controversies on the Text of the New Testament. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 223–227. 
  • Metzger, Bruce Manning (1994). A Textual Commentary on the Greek New Testament: A Companion Volume to the United Bible Societies' Greek New Testament. London, New York: United Bible Societies. 

External links