Sample abundance

From HandWiki
Short description: Signal-processing paradigm that trades precision for volume of measurements


Sample abundance is a signal processing paradigm in which very large numbers of low-precision measurements—often one-bit samples produced by comparators with time-varying thresholds—are leveraged to recover signals or parameters with high fidelity and reduced computational cost.[1] Instead of enforcing difficult constraints (e.g., positive-semidefiniteness or low rank) during reconstruction, many problems under sample abundance are reformulated as overdetermined linear feasibility tasks defined by half-space inequalities. With sufficiently many binary measurements, these inequalities confine the solution to a small polyhedral region around the ground truth, making formerly essential constraints unnecessary. Beyond a critical number of samples, the algorithmic load collapses suddenly—a phenomenon that may be referred to as the sample abundance singularity.[2]

Conceptual illustration of a one-bit polyhedron (black lines) formed by half-spaces from binary comparisons. As samples increase, the feasible region shrinks around the true solution (purple) and can lie entirely inside a broader constraint set (orange).

Background

One-bit and few-bit analog-to-digital converters (ADCs) are attractive in applications such as massive MIMO and radar because comparators are inexpensive, fast, and power-efficient. Introducing dither or time-varying thresholds allows binary signs to retain sufficient statistical information for estimation, including covariance and spectrum recovery via generalized arcsine-law results.[3][4] Hybrid architectures such as Unlimited One-Bit Sampling (UNO) combine modulo folding with one-bit thresholds to further increase dynamic range while retaining low hardware cost.[5] Related efforts span low-resolution MIMO channel estimation and radar processing with binary data.[6][7]

Definition

Let a one-bit sample be obtained by comparing a measurement yk with a threshold τk: rk=sgn(ykτk){1,+1}. Each observation yields the linear inequality rk(ykτk)0. Stacking many samples and writing 𝐲=𝐀𝐱 for linear sensing gives the one-bit polyhedron:

𝒫𝐱={ 𝐱d𝐏𝐱𝐛 },

where 𝐏 collects signed rows of 𝐀 and 𝐛 stacks the threshold terms. Under sample abundance (many more inequalities than unknowns), 𝒫𝐱 typically has finite volume near the ground truth and shrinks as more samples are added.[1]

Sample abundance singularity

The sample abundance singularity refers to the observed regime change in which, after a problem-dependent measurement threshold is exceeded, computational requirements collapse from non-convex or constrained programs (e.g., semidefinite or rank-constrained formulations) to simple projections onto linear half-spaces. In this regime, enforcing positive semidefiniteness, rank, or sparsity may become unnecessary because the polyhedral feasible set already localizes the solution to within the desired accuracy.[8][1]

Mathematical formulation and examples

Phase retrieval

With quadratic measurements known only through one-bit comparisons to thresholds, each binary sample imposes an inequality in the lifted variable 𝐗=𝐱𝐱: rj()𝐚j𝐗𝐚jrj()τj(). Beyond ample sampling, explicit PSD and rank-one constraints used by semidefinite programs (e.g., PhaseLift) can be omitted in practice.[8][9]

Low-rank matrix sensing

For linear measurements yj=Tr(𝐀j𝐗), one-bit signs rj()=sgn(yjτj()) define a polyhedron in the matrix space; with abundant samples, nuclear-norm or rank constraints can become optional to enforce.[10]

Compressed sensing

Given 𝐲=𝐀𝐱 and signs rj()=sgn(𝐚j,𝐱τj()), the feasible set

𝒫𝐱(C)={ 𝐱nrj()𝐚j,𝐱rj()τj() }

can localize a sparse vector without explicit 1 minimization when many binary comparisons are available.[11][12]

Algorithms

Because sample abundance yields overdetermined systems of linear inequalities, projection methods are natural. The Randomized Kaczmarz Algorithm (RKA) selects a row at random and projects the iterate; for consistent systems it converges linearly in expectation at a rate governed by a scaled condition number.[13][14] The Sampling Kaczmarz–Motzkin (SKM) method draws a mini-batch of rows, chooses the most violated constraint, and projects, often accelerating convergence on large systems.[15] Unrolled and plug-and-play variants tailored to one-bit data have also been reported for speed and robustness.[1]

Finite volume property

The Finite Volume Property (FVP) provides sample-complexity bounds ensuring that the polyhedron formed by one-bit inequalities has small volume (e.g., lies inside an ε-ball around the truth). For isotropic measurements, one set of results implies that

m=O(ε3) samples yield error O(m1/3),

with improved O(ε2) scaling when the signal belongs to structured sets (e.g., sparse vectors or low-rank matrices) whose Kolmogorov entropies are smaller.[1][16] These guarantees help explain why explicit PSD, rank, or sparsity constraints can become redundant once the number of binary comparisons exceeds a problem-dependent threshold.[1]

Applications

  • Low-resolution receivers in massive MIMO communications and detection.[17]
  • Radar and automotive sensing, including covariance-based DOA and one-bit Hankel matrix completion.[18][19]
  • Unlimited/one-bit sampling for bandlimited and finite-rate-of-innovation signals, and HDR imaging with sweeping thresholds.[20]

See also

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 Eamaz, Arian; Yeganegi, Farhang; Needell, Deanna; Soltanalian, Mojtaba (2024). "Harnessing the Power of Sample Abundance: Theoretical Guarantees and Algorithms for Accelerated One-Bit Sensing". IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 70 (9): 6690–6713. doi:10.1109/TIT.2024.3422918. Bibcode2024ITIT...70.6690E. 
  2. "SA-TWG Webinar: New Frontiers in One-Bit Signal Processing: From Sample Abundance to Efficient Intelligence at Scale". IEEE. https://signalprocessingsociety.org/events/sa-twg-webinar-new-frontiers-one-bit-signal-processing-sample-abundance-efficient. 
  3. Eamaz, Arian; Yeganegi, Farhang; Soltanalian, Mojtaba (2023). "Covariance Recovery for One-Bit Sampled Stationary Signals with Time-Varying Sampling Thresholds". Signal Processing 206. doi:10.1016/j.sigpro.2022.108899. Bibcode2023SigPr.20608899E. 
  4. Eamaz, Arian; Yeganegi, Farhang (2022). "Covariance Recovery for One-Bit Sampled Non-Stationary Signals with Time-Varying Sampling Thresholds". IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 70: 5222–5236. doi:10.1109/TSP.2022.3217379. Bibcode2022ITSP...70.5222E. 
  5. Eamaz, Arian; Mishra, Kumar V.; Yeganegi, Farhang; Soltanalian, Mojtaba (2024). "UNO: Unlimited Sampling Meets One-Bit Quantization". IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 72: 997–1014. doi:10.1109/TSP.2024.3356253. Bibcode2024ITSP...72..997E. 
  6. Mezghani, Amine; Swindlehurst, A. Lee (2018). "Blind Estimation of Sparse Broadband Massive MIMO Channels with Ideal and One-Bit ADCs". IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 66 (11): 2972–2983. doi:10.1109/TSP.2018.2821640. Bibcode2018ITSP...66.2972M. 
  7. Ameri, Aria; Bose, Arindam; Li, Jian; Soltanalian, Mojtaba (2019). "One-Bit Radar Processing with Time-Varying Sampling Thresholds". IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 67 (20): 5297–5308. doi:10.1109/TSP.2019.2939086. Bibcode2019ITSP...67.5297A. 
  8. 8.0 8.1 Eamaz, Arian; Yeganegi, Farhang; Soltanalian, Mojtaba (2022). "One-Bit Phase Retrieval: More Samples Means Less Complexity?". IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 70: 4618–4632. doi:10.36227/techrxiv.19372541. 
  9. Eamaz, Arian; Yeganegi, Farhang; Needell, Deanna; Soltanalian, Mojtaba (2023). "One-Bit Quadratic Compressed Sensing: From Sample Abundance to Linear Feasibility". IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT). doi:10.1109/ISIT54713.2023.10206479. 
  10. Yeganegi, Farhang; Eamaz, Arian; Soltanalian, Mojtaba (2024). "Low-Rank Matrix Sensing with Dithered One-Bit Quantization". IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT). pp. 527–532. doi:10.1109/ISIT57864.2024.10619615. 
  11. Dirksen, Sjoerd; Mendelson, Shahar (2021). "Non-Gaussian Hyperplane Tessellations and Robust One-Bit Compressed Sensing". Journal of the European Mathematical Society 23 (9): 2913–2947. doi:10.4171/JEMS/1066. 
  12. Xu, Chunlei; Jacques, Laurent (2020). "Quantized Compressive Sensing with RIP Matrices: The Benefit of Dithering". Information and Inference: A Journal of the IMA 9 (3): 543–586. doi:10.1093/imaiai/iaz021. 
  13. Strohmer, Thomas; Vershynin, Roman (2009). "A Randomized Kaczmarz Algorithm with Exponential Convergence". Journal of Fourier Analysis and Applications 15 (2): 262–278. doi:10.1007/s00041-008-9030-4. Bibcode2009JFAA...15..262S. 
  14. Leventhal, Daniel; Lewis, Adrian S. (2010). "Randomized Methods for Linear Constraints: Convergence Rates and Conditioning". Mathematics of Operations Research 35 (3): 641–654. doi:10.1287/moor.1100.0456. 
  15. De Loera, Jesús A.; Haddock, John; Needell, Deanna (2017). "A Sampling Kaczmarz–Motzkin Algorithm for Linear Feasibility". SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing 39 (5): S66–S87. doi:10.1137/16M1073807. Bibcode2017SJSC...39S..66D. 
  16. Jacques, Laurent; Cambareri, Vittorio (2017). "Time for Dithering: Fast and Quantized Random Embeddings via the Restricted Isometry Property". Information and Inference: A Journal of the IMA 6 (4): 441–476. doi:10.1093/imaiai/iax004. 
  17. Mezghani, Amine; Swindlehurst, A. Lee (2018). "Blind Estimation of Sparse Broadband Massive MIMO Channels with Ideal and One-Bit ADCs". IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 66 (11): 2972–2983. doi:10.1109/TSP.2018.2821640. Bibcode2018ITSP...66.2972M. 
  18. Ameri, Aria; Bose, Arindam; Li, Jian; Soltanalian, Mojtaba (2019). "One-Bit Radar Processing with Time-Varying Sampling Thresholds". IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 67 (20): 5297–5308. doi:10.1109/TSP.2019.2939086. Bibcode2019ITSP...67.5297A. 
  19. Eamaz, Arian; Yeganegi, Farhang; Hu, Yunqiao; Sun, Shunqiao; Soltanalian, Mojtaba (2024). "Automotive Radar Sensing with Sparse Linear Arrays Using One-Bit Hankel Matrix Completion". IEEE Radar Conference (RadarConf24). https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10548330. 
  20. Eamaz, Arian; Mishra, Kumar V.; Yeganegi, Farhang; Soltanalian, Mojtaba (2023). "Unlimited Sampling via One-Bit Quantization". International Conference on Sampling Theory and Applications (SampTA). https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10301408.