Semi-invariant of a quiver
In mathematics, given a quiver Q with set of vertices Q0 and set of arrows Q1, a representation of Q assigns a vector space Vi to each vertex and a linear map V(α): V(s(α)) → V(t(α)) to each arrow α, where s(α), t(α) are, respectively, the starting and the ending vertices of α. Given an element d ∈ [math]\displaystyle{ \mathbb{N} }[/math]Q0, the set of representations of Q with dim Vi = d(i) for each i has a vector space structure.
It is naturally endowed with an action of the algebraic group Πi∈Q0 GL(d(i)) by simultaneous base change. Such action induces one on the ring of functions. The ones which are invariants up to a character of the group are called semi-invariants. They form a ring whose structure reflects representation-theoretical properties of the quiver.
Definitions
Let Q = (Q0,Q1,s,t) be a quiver. Consider a dimension vector d, that is an element in [math]\displaystyle{ \mathbb{N} }[/math]Q0. The set of d-dimensional representations is given by
- [math]\displaystyle{ \operatorname{Rep}(Q,\mathbf{d}):=\{V\in \operatorname{Rep}(Q) : V_i = \mathbf{d}(i)\} }[/math]
Once fixed bases for each vector space Vi this can be identified with the vector space
- [math]\displaystyle{ \bigoplus_{\alpha\in Q_1} \operatorname{Hom}_k(k^{\mathbf{d}(s(\alpha))}, k^{\mathbf{d}(t(\alpha))}) }[/math]
Such affine variety is endowed with an action of the algebraic group GL(d) := Πi∈ Q0 GL(d(i)) by simultaneous base change on each vertex:
- [math]\displaystyle{ \begin{array}{ccc} GL(\mathbf{d}) \times \operatorname{Rep}(Q,\mathbf{d}) & \longrightarrow & \operatorname{Rep}(Q,\mathbf{d})\\ \Big((g_i), (V_i, V(\alpha))\Big) & \longmapsto & (V_i,g_{t(\alpha)}\cdot V(\alpha)\cdot g_{s(\alpha)}^{-1} ) \end{array} }[/math]
By definition two modules M,N ∈ Rep(Q,d) are isomorphic if and only if their GL(d)-orbits coincide.
We have an induced action on the coordinate ring k[Rep(Q,d)] by defining:
- [math]\displaystyle{ \begin{array}{ccc} GL(\mathbf{d}) \times k[\operatorname{Rep}(Q,\mathbf{d})] & \longrightarrow & k[\operatorname{Rep}(Q,\mathbf{d})]\\ (g, f) & \longmapsto & g\cdot f(-):=f(g^{-1}. -) \end{array} }[/math]
Polynomial invariants
An element f ∈ k[Rep(Q,d)] is called an invariant (with respect to GL(d)) if g⋅f = f for any g ∈ GL(d). The set of invariants
- [math]\displaystyle{ I(Q,\mathbf{d}):=k[\operatorname{Rep}(Q,\mathbf{d})]^{GL(\mathbf{d})} }[/math]
is in general a subalgebra of k[Rep(Q,d)].
Example
Consider the 1-loop quiver Q:
For d = (n) the representation space is End(kn) and the action of GL(n) is given by usual conjugation. The invariant ring is
- [math]\displaystyle{ I(Q,\mathbf{d})=k[c_1,\ldots,c_n] }[/math]
where the cis are defined, for any A ∈ End(kn), as the coefficients of the characteristic polynomial
- [math]\displaystyle{ \det(A-t \mathbb{I})=t^n-c_1(A)t^{n-1}+\cdots+(-1)^n c_n(A) }[/math]
Semi-invariants
In case Q has neither loops nor cycles the variety k[Rep(Q,d)] has a unique closed orbit corresponding to the unique d-dimensional semi-simple representation, therefore any invariant function is constant.
Elements which are invariants with respect to the subgroup SL(d) := Π{i ∈ Q0} SL(d(i)) form a ring, SI(Q,d), with a richer structure called ring of semi-invariants. It decomposes as
- [math]\displaystyle{ SI(Q,\mathbf{d})=\bigoplus_{\sigma\in \mathbb{Z}^{Q_0}} SI(Q,\mathbf{d})_{\sigma} }[/math]
where
- [math]\displaystyle{ SI(Q,\mathbf{d})_{\sigma}:= \{f\in k[\operatorname{Rep}(Q,\mathbf{d})] : g\cdot f = \prod_{i\in Q_0}\det(g_i)^{\sigma_i} f, \forall g\in GL(\mathbf{d})\}. }[/math]
A function belonging to SI(Q,d)σ is called semi-invariant of weight σ.
Example
Consider the quiver Q:
- [math]\displaystyle{ 1 \xrightarrow{\ \ \alpha\ } 2 }[/math]
Fix d = (n,n). In this case k[Rep(Q,(n,n))] is congruent to the set of square matrices of size n: M(n). The function defined, for any B ∈ M(n), as detu(B(α)) is a semi-invariant of weight (u,−u) in fact
- [math]\displaystyle{ (g_1,g_2)\cdot {\det}^u (B) = {\det}^u(g_2^{-1}B g_1)= {\det}^u(g_1) {\det}^{-u}(g_2) {\det}^u(B) }[/math]
The ring of semi-invariants equals the polynomial ring generated by det, i.e.
- [math]\displaystyle{ \mathsf{SI}(Q,\mathbf{d})=k[\det] }[/math]
Characterization of representation type through semi-invariant theory
For quivers of finite representation-type, that is to say Dynkin quivers, the vector space k[Rep(Q,d)] admits an open dense orbit. In other words, it is a prehomogenous vector space. Sato and Kimura described the ring of semi-invariants in such case.
Sato–Kimura theorem
Let Q be a Dynkin quiver, d a dimension vector. Let Σ be the set of weights σ such that there exists fσ ∈ SI(Q,d)σ non-zero and irreducible. Then the following properties hold true.
i) For every weight σ we have dimk SI(Q,d)σ ≤ 1.
ii) All weights in Σ are linearly independent over [math]\displaystyle{ \mathbb{Q} }[/math].
iii) SI(Q,d) is the polynomial ring generated by the fσ's, σ ∈ Σ.
Furthermore, we have an interpretation for the generators of this polynomial algebra. Let O be the open orbit, then k[Rep(Q,d)] \ O = Z1 ∪ ... ∪ Zt where each Zi is closed and irreducible. We can assume that the Zis are arranged in increasing order with respect to the codimension so that the first l have codimension one and Zi is the zero-set of the irreducible polynomial f1, then SI(Q,d) = k[f1, ..., fl].
Example
In the example above the action of GL(n,n) has an open orbit on M(n) consisting of invertible matrices. Then we immediately recover SI(Q,(n,n)) = k[det].
Skowronski–Weyman provided a geometric characterization of the class of tame quivers (i.e. Dynkin and Euclidean quivers) in terms of semi-invariants.
Skowronski–Weyman theorem
Let Q be a finite connected quiver. The following are equivalent:
i) Q is either a Dynkin quiver or a Euclidean quiver.
ii) For each dimension vector d, the algebra SI(Q,d) is complete intersection.
iii) For each dimension vector d, the algebra SI(Q,d) is either a polynomial algebra or a hypersurface.
Example
Consider the Euclidean quiver Q:
Pick the dimension vector d = (1,1,1,1,2). An element V ∈ k[Rep(Q,d)] can be identified with a 4-ple (A1, A2, A3, A4) of matrices in M(1,2). Call Di,j the function defined on each V as det(Ai,Aj). Such functions generate the ring of semi-invariants:
- [math]\displaystyle{ SI(Q,\mathbf{d})=\frac{k[D_{1,2},D_{3,4},D_{1,4},D_{2,3},D_{1,3},D_{2,4}]}{D_{1,2}D_{3,4}+D_{1,4}D_{2,3}-D_{1,3}D_{2,4}} }[/math]
See also
References
- Derksen, H.; Weyman, J. (2000), "Semi-invariants of quivers and saturation for Littlewood–Richardson coefficients.", J. Amer. Math. Soc. 3 (13): 467–479, doi:10.1090/S0894-0347-00-00331-3, http://www.ams.org/journals/jams/2000-13-03/S0894-0347-00-00331-3/home.html
- Sato, M.; Kimura, T. (1977), "A classification of irreducible prehomogeneous vector spaces and their relative invariants.", Nagoya Math. J. 65: 1–155, doi:10.1017/S0027763000017633, http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.nmj/1118796150
- Skowronski, A.; Weyman, J. (2000), "The algebras of semi-invariants of quivers.", Transform. Groups 5 (4): 361–402, doi:10.1007/bf01234798
Original source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semi-invariant of a quiver.
Read more |